NATO Standardization in the Field of Armaments STANAG.pdf · 2014-06-11 · Standardization is the...
Transcript of NATO Standardization in the Field of Armaments STANAG.pdf · 2014-06-11 · Standardization is the...
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 1
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
NATO Standardization in the Field of Armaments
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 2
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Friedrich HoffendTechnical Assistant for Standardization in the Armaments Sector
Professional Employment in the Defense Administration:• Preparatory Service for medium-level technical career
• 02 May 1988 – 30 Apr 1989
• WTD 51 Section 121 02 May 1989 – 31 Dec 1991Clerk Waterway Crossing
• BWB KG 55 01 Jan 1992 – 30 Oct 2005Clerk Machine Tools/ Air Conditioning
• Preparatory training for promotion from the medium-level technical career to higher-level technical career 01 Nov 2005 – 27 Apr 2007
• BWB U45.2 28 Apr 2007 – 01 Mar 2009Technical Assistant, Protected Transport Vehicles
• BWB T5.5 (Q3.1) today 02 Mar 2009Technical Assistant, Standardization in the Armaments Sector
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 3
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Why does NATO need Standardization?
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 4
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
In order to make cooperation between the
NATO forces in joint operations as
efficiently as possible.
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 5
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Principle of Standardization
The preferred principle is to adapt suitable civilian standards for use in the NATO in an unchanged form. This shall apply in the absence of any compelling reasons against such adaption.
Put another way:
To the largest extent possible, the alliance uses suitable civilian standards. NATO standards are being prepared only if no applicable civilian standard is available.
Slide 5
As of: 07/2012
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 6
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Fundamentals of Standardization
Slide 6
As of: 07/2012
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 7
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Terms and Definitions
Slide 7
As of: 07/2012
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 8
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
A standard is a value established and defined on the basis of an order, habit or agreement, a physical quantity or abstract term serving as reference value or reference figure, model or rule to measure quantities and qualities, to specify techniques and procedures or to evaluate results. Quantity or quality shall be determined in this context.(NATO definition)
Standard
Document, established by consensus and approved by a recognized body, that provides, for common and repeated
use, rules, guidelines or characteristics for activities or their results, aimed at the achievement of the optimum degree
of order in a given context.
(DIN EN 45020)
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 9
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Standardization is the development and application of concepts, policies, procedures and designs (constructions) in order to establish and maintain the level of compatibility, interchangeability and commonality required to attain the intended degree of interoperability or to optimize the use of assets in the fields of military command and control, processes, materiel, technology and administration.(NATO definition)
Standardization
Activity to lay down rules and guidelines for general and recurring application with regard to current or foreseeable
problems, the aim being to achieve an optimum degree of order in a given context.
(DIN EN 45020)
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 10
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Interoperability is the ability to operate in synergy in the performance of assigned tasks.
Interoperability
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 11
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
A STANAG is a NATO standardization document, in which the member states agree to
completely or partially implement a standard in order to meet an interoperability
requirement.
NATO Standardization Agreement (STANAG)
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 12
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
A STANREC is a NATO standardization document specifying one or more NATO or
NON-NATO standards relevant for a specific activity of the alliances, but not related to
interoperability. STANRECs are prepared and used in the materiel-related fields of
standardization only.
NATO Standardization Recommendation (STANREC)
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 13
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
An AP is an official standardization document authorized by several or by all NATO
member states as a general implementing document.
If required, APs are put into force by a Cover STANAG.
An AP assumed to involve interoperability requirements is issued in conjunction with a
Covering STANAG. An AP concerning the field of materiel standardization only is
issued in conjunction with a Covering STANREC.
Allied Publication (AP)
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 14
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Multinational Publications (MP) are being prepared in addition to Allied Publications
with the specific intention to make NATO procedures available to “non-NATO states”
in order to promote optimum interoperability between the armed forces of the
respective states and NATO states.
MPs are based upon “Source APs”, which is cleared of all confidential information.
Multinational Publication (MP)
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 15
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Examples of APs:
• AAP Allied Administrativ Publication (general)
• ALP Allied Logisitic Publication (logistic principles)
• AJP Allied Joint Publication (armed serviced)
• APP Allied Procedural Publictaion (procedures)
• AQAP Allied Quality Assurance Publication(quality assurance)
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 16
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 17
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Standardization Levels
a. Compatibility(lowest level of standardization)
b. Interchangeability(second highest level of standardization)
c) Commonality(highest level of standardization)
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 18
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Areas of StandardizationOperational Materiel Administrative
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 19
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Shares of Standardization Areas
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 20
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 21
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
“Bottom-Up” or “Top-Down”Identifying a requirement for standardization
TAValidation
Evaluation of the necessity
Task assignment to WG
WG (= Nations/SCs)Formulation
Study/Study Draft
Nations/SCsRatification
Nations to express their view on
scope and date of the
tmplementationDNSAPromulgation
Distribution of final
Nations/SCsImplementation
Nations putting it into effect on a national
level by a certain date
TA/WGVerification/Review
Validity verification conducted every 3 years
TAImplementation of revision:
new edition/
no need for modification/
cancellation
Development Cycle of a STANAG
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 22
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Fü S VI 6
Spokesperson
Implementingauthority
Planning
Implementation
AGIS
Fü San II 1
FMOD STANAG lead branch
SKA III 2 (3)
Coord.elements
STANAG control center
STANAG lead branches
Fü H II 4
HA II 3 (1)
Fü L III 2 Fü M II 1 M II/IT 1Rü IV 1
Fü S VI 6
Org. area: FMOD, JSS,
territorial defense
administration, military legal
system, chaplain service
LwAZWELw
SanABwX 1
MarAWA 21
IT-AmtBwA3
SKA III 2 (3)SKUKdo
Log G4 II 3
Competent authority
Authorities tobe involved
Organisation
BAAINBwP1.4
Lead agency
AGIS: Interoperability and Standardization Working Group
for the armaments organization
Standardization Organization in the Bundeswehr
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 23
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Process organization of standardization until 31 March 2012
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 24
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Slide 24
As of: 07/2012
Process organization of standardization in the target structure
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 25
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Staffing of a STANAG Study in the Armaments
Organization
Spokesperson/Custodian
Coordinating AgencyBWB P 1.4
STANAGlead branch
Control Center
Implementing
Agency
Other Coordinating Agencies
Spokesperson/CustodianLead agency
Defining
responsibility
Study Draft
National statement
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 26
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
The Process of Approval in the Armaments Organization (STANAG Draft)
Coordinating AgencyBAAINBw Q3.1
STAMISLead agencyOther Coordinating
Agencies
LegalAssessment
STANAGControl Center
Co-signature processDocument control instrument
Assessment
process
Request for approval
Update STANAG Catalog/STAMIS
NATO Notification of Approval
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 27
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Possible Answers in Ratifying Process
(AAP-03(J))
• Ratifying and Implementing
• Ratifying and Implementing with Reservations
• Ratifying, future Implementation
• Ratifying, future Implementation with reservations
• Not Ratifiying
• Not Participating
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 28
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Implementation (final STANAG)
Coordinating AgencyBAAINBw Q3.1
STAMISImplementing
AgencyOther Coordinating
Agencies
STANAGControl Center
Document control instrument
InformationRequest for
Implementation
Update STANAG Catalog/STAMIS
ImplementationDocument
Information
NATO
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 29
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 30
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Slide 30
As of: 07/2012
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 31
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
By FMOD decree(date of the Implementation Document )
both
STANAG and
STANRECwill become binding to the Bundeswehr for the
scope specified !
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 32
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
The term External STANAG relates to STANAGs managed outside of the own
organizational area.
They are to be staffed by the technically responsible agency.
If no technically responsible agency can be identified, staffing is to be conducted with
reference to the lack of expertise.
External STANAG
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 33
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
• Extraordinary circumstances/ individual cases
• Problematic in case
- major legal assessment is
expected due to delicate topics
(International Law, Prisoner-of-War Affairs etc.)
- involvement of the Budget Directorate is required
- translation capacities regarding specialist terminology are scarce
• Very strict time constraints
Fast Track Procedure
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 34
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Spokespersons and Delegates
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 35
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
General Tasks of Spokespersons and Delegates of the Armaments
Organization
Basis for authority of Spokespersons/
Delegates :
Certificate of Appointment – Appointment
by FMOD….
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 36
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Tasks of the Spokesperson Regarding the Individual Activities Within a Standardization
Body (Excerpt)
Draft
Agenda
Review of change proposal
Agenda
Review, tasks regarding
NatPosPap
DEU Armament
Sector View
National
preparatory
meeting?
NatPosPap approved by
FMOD
Meeting/
Activity Contribute armament sector view/
NatPos
RoD
Staffing of
documents
Evaluation,
distribution
Draft
RoD
Review
change proposal
Record of
Decisions
What do others have to
know?
Need for action?
Distribution?
Body
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 37
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
DEU / Armaments Sector Position
• On the basis of the agenda, coordinate relevant topics with:
- all parties to be involved
- other organizational areas, if necessary
• Preparation of a national position paper
- clear scope for negotiations for the DEU representative
- If coordination is not possible by giving written notice, initiate national preparatory meeting,
to eliminate any differences.
• Result (position paper) is to be approved by the respective responsible authority and by the
lead branch (Rü IV 1)
Agenda
= Provide security of action to DEU spokesperson
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 38
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Tasks and Authority During the Meeting
• Represent the national position approved by the STANAG lead branch
at the meetings
• Not make any binding statements if the course of the negotiations is not
in compliance with given directions / national position
• Refer to the pending national decision required if no decision is to be
obtained by the directing authorities. Request postponement / raise
reservations
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 39
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Umsetzung der Ergebnisse
Within 14 days of the end of the meeting:
• Provide results in Record of Decisions
• All parties to be involved,
• In addition to the course of the negotiations, the RoD will include the following:
- own assessments on the basis of the directions
regarding the represented postion,
- proposals on subsequent measures ,
- deadlines with regard to the processing of the
meeting contents and to follow-up meetings,
- any impending decisions shall be mentioned
Record of Decisions
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 40
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
STAMIS Standard Army Management Information System
- Representation of the administratively and technically competent
authorities for national STANAG processing and implementation
- Representation of spokespersons and delegates in NATO bodies
- Representation of the degree of standardization
- Representation of technical content work in standardization bodies
- Provision of all STANAGs in all implementation statuses as digitalized
full-text documents
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 41
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
BWB P1.4
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 42
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Terminology Work in the Bundeswehr
Basis- Bw Terminology Directive (WsgTermBw)- Bw Terminology Policy (RiTermBw)
Purpose
- Common terminology
- Continuous improvement
DatabaseLEXIS- Access via Federal Office of Languages (Bundessprachenamt)
ResponsibilityBWB T2.2
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 43
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Standardization objectives of the
NATO
-standardization program (NSP)
Standardization proposals
by other NATO states,
authorities, commands,
committees and agencies
Top Down
Tasking Autorities (TAs)
Bottom Up
Review and confirmation
by the competent authorities
Triennial review initiated
by the responsible TA
that may lead to the
development of a new
proposal
Implementation by the
nations in accordance
with the NATO
effective date (NED)
(if specified )
Information by NSO through the NSA
with respect to selected proposals
Assessment of inclusion to the
NATO Standardization Program
Notification and
distribution
Submission of the document
to the NSA chairman
for notification
Approval to
notification issued by
the competent TA
Processing & development
1. Guidelines for urgency and
time schedule
2. Establishment of a working group
and of the custodian
3. Assignment of a STANAG number
4. Continuous processing of the drafts
within the WG and by the
custodian
5. Preparation of a ratification
draft for approval by the
competent Tasking Autority (TA)
Submission of the
ratification draft
by the competent TA
to the nations
including the
request for approval
Approval issued by
the nations incl.
The intended or
the actual
effective date
Processing taking
into account the
national comments
made and preparation
of the STANAG
for notification
3
3
10 - 15
11 - 16
14 - 19
18 - 25
i.a.w. NED
= estimated cumulative duration of the process in months
(best case – worst case)
Overview of STANAG Development
BAAINBw – Q3.1 As of: 05/2012Slide 44
Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support
Thank your for your attention.
Do you have any questions?