National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project...
Transcript of National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project...
![Page 1: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
National Mental Health Benchmarking Project
An Australian Government funded initiative
COMPARATIVE INDICATORS
3-year time series 2004-05 to 2006-07
Forensic Mental Health Services Forum
Version 1.0 Summary for Public Release
Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification NetworkNovember 2008
This document was prepared from a more detailed version developed for restricted use by organisations participating in the National Mental Health Benchmarking Project. By agreement of all organisations, this
version of the indicators has been prepared for wider use and unrestricted distribution. All identifying details and source data tables have been removed from this version.
“Sharing Information to Improve Outcomes"
![Page 2: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contents
What this package containsThis document is organised into three parts.
PART A - Summary table and charts of the 13 national KPIs (Pages 4 - 8)This part presents the national KPIs for each of the organisations in tabular and graphical format. All KPIs are derived from the data submitted by each organisation for each of the years 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07, and constructed according to the specifications and definitions described in National Mental Health Benchmarking Project Manual.
PART B - Selected indicators grouped by themes (Pages 11 - 32)This part groups the national KPIs, plus a number of supplementary indicators, into nine themes.1. Comparative resources available to the organisation2. Efficiency in use of resources3. Productivity and activity of ambulatory services4. Continuity of care 5. Access to ambulatory care6. Access to acute inpatient care7. Safety (ACHS Indicators)8. Capability9. Acute Inpatient casemix - (a) Diagnosis and (b) HoNOS at admission
The themes were selected only on the basis of what is feasible from the available data. They were not intended to restrict participating organisations to the eight categories, nor pre-empt where organisations focused their benchmarking effort.
All supplementary indicators are derived from source data submitted by organisations in their KPI workbooks. These details are not included in this public release version of the document. Details on how the supplementary indicators are constructed are however provided at the end of this Part of the document (pages 26-32).
PART C - Source data tablesOmitted from this public release version.
Page 2 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 3: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Version History
Version historyVersion Preparation date Details 1.0 20-Nov-08 First public release version, using final validated data as signed off by participating organisations.
Page 3 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 4: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
PART A
Summary table and charts of the 13 national KPIs
Page 4 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 5: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
KPI Summary Table_3 years
KPI Summary TableNOTE: The indicators shown below are based on the calculation approach described in the Technical Specifications document and do not show any of the alternative approaches developed for several of the indicators.
Org
-D
Org
-C
Org
-B
Org
-A
GR
OU
P A
VG.
KPI #1 28-day readmissions 2004-05 3.7% 0.0% n.a 2.4% 2.0%
2005-06 2.2% 5.0% 0.0% 3.5% 2.7%
2006-07 2.0% 1.8% 0.0% 4.1% 2.0%
KPI #2 National Standards compliance (Level 1) 2004-05 100% 0% 100% 100% 75%
2005-06 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
2006-07 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
KPI #3 Average acute LOS 2004-05 50.3 93.4 106.2 22.1 68.0
2005-06 53.5 83.7 222.7 19.5 94.9
2006-07 70.9 72.8 134.7 18.1 74.1
KPI #4 Average acute episode cost 2004-05 $47,883 $69,693 $75,847 $25,081 $54,626
2005-06 $49,224 $28,288 $170,972 $23,634 $68,029
2006-07 $67,445 $25,257 $107,856 $22,134 $55,673
KPI #5 Treatment days per 3-month community care period 2004-05 6.4 3.5 3.7 10.4 6.0
2005-06 6.8 4.5 3.2 7.2 5.4
2006-07 6.4 4.1 2.9 10.0 5.9
KPI #6 Cost per 3-month community care period 2004-05 $2,358 $2,877 $968 $4,614 $2,704
2005-06 $3,504 $1,477 $917 $4,970 $2,717
2006-07 $4,693 $1,349 $1,238 $5,095 $3,094
FORENSIC SERVICES - 3 year trends
Page 5 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 6: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
KPI Summary Table_3 years
KPI Summary TableNOTE: The indicators shown below are based on the calculation approach described in the Technical Specifications document and do not show any of the alternative approaches developed for several of the indicators.
Org
-D
Org
-C
Org
-B
Org
-A
GR
OU
P A
VG.
FORENSIC SERVICES - 3 year trends
KPI #7 % target population receiving ambulatory services 2004-05 0.025% 0.028% 0.086% 0.017% 0.039%
2005-06 0.023% 0.080% 0.090% 0.031% 0.056%
2006-07 0.020% 0.125% 0.136% 0.030% 0.078%
% target population receiving inpatient services 2004-05 0.004% 0.003% 0.003% 0.017% 0.007%
2005-06 0.003% 0.003% 0.003% 0.020% 0.007%
2006-07 0.003% 0.003% 0.003% 0.018% 0.007%
% target population receiving residential services 2004-05 0.000%
2005-06 0.000%
2006-07 0.000%
KPI #8 Local access to inpatient care 2004-05 n.a n.a 100% 100% 100%
2005-06 100% n.a 100% 100% 100%
2006-07 n.a n.a 100% 100% 100%
KPI #9 New client index 2004-05 46% 73% 35% 66% 55%
2005-06 45% 79% 57% 79% 65%
2006-07 47% 69% 66% 79% 65%
KPI #10 Area per capita resources - Ambulatory services 2004-05 $0.56 $2.29 $0.89 $1.02 $1.19
2005-06 $0.68 $1.70 $1.03 $1.03 $1.11
2006-07 $0.80 $1.96 $1.99 $1.11 $1.46
Page 6 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 7: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
KPI Summary Table_3 years
KPI Summary TableNOTE: The indicators shown below are based on the calculation approach described in the Technical Specifications document and do not show any of the alternative approaches developed for several of the indicators.
Org
-D
Org
-C
Org
-B
Org
-A
GR
OU
P A
VG.
FORENSIC SERVICES - 3 year trends
Area per capita resources - Inpatient services 2004-05 $7.63 $3.64 $5.29 $7.29 $5.96
2005-06 $7.21 $1.91 $5.86 $7.36 $5.58
2006-07 $6.82 $1.94 $5.11 $7.93 $5.45
Area per capita resources - Residential services 2004-05 $0.00
2005-06 $0.00
2006-07 $0.00
KPI #11 Pre admission community care 2004-05 100% 38% 44% 27% 52%
2005-06 100% 75% 100% 28% 76%
2006-07 100% 86% 100% 35% 80%
KPI #12 Post discharge community care 2004-05 49% 27% 64% 44% 46%
2005-06 73% 47% 45% 51% 54%
2006-07 69% 51% 38% 37% 49%
KPI #13 Outcomes readiness - inpatient services 2004-05 100% 103% 111% 108% 105%
2005-06 100% 116% 101% 91% 102%
2006-07 71% 100% 68% 52% 73%
Outcomes readiness - ambulatory services 2004-05 3% 54% 0% 58% 29%
2005-06 5% 55% 0% 39% 25%
2006-07 17% 53% 0% 45% 29%
Page 7 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 8: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
National KPI Charts
5
The 13 NATIONAL KPIs IN NUMERICAL ORDER
KPI #4 Cost per acute inpatient episode
$67,445
$25,257
$107,856
$22,134
$55,673
$49,224
$28,288
$170,972
$23,634
$68,029
$47,883
$69,693
$75,847
$25,081
$54,626
$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #1 28-day readmission rate
2.0%
1.8%
0.0%
4.1%
2.0%
2.2%
5.0%
0.0%
3.5%
2.7%
3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
2.0%
0% 2% 4% 6%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #2 National Standards compliance (Level 1 only)
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
75%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #3 Average acute length of stay
71
73
135
18
74
54
84
223
20
95
50
93
106
22
68
0 50 100 150 200
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #5 Average treatment days per 3 month period of community care
6.4
4.1
2.9
10.0
5.9
6.8
4.5
3.2
7.2
5.4
6.4
3.5
3.7
10.4
6.0
0 3 6 9 12
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #6 Average cost per 3 month period of community care
$4,693
$1,349
$1,238
$5,095
$3,094
$3,504
$1,477
$917
$4,970
$2,717
$2,358
$2,877
$968
$4,614
$2,704
$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Page 8 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 9: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
National KPI Charts
The 13 NATIONAL KPIs IN NUMERICAL ORDER
KPI #7a % target population receiving ambulatory services
0.020%
0.125%
0.136%
0.030%
0.078%
0.023%
0.080%
0.090%
0.031%
0.056%
0.02%
0.03%
0.09%
0.02%
0.04%
0.00% 0.04% 0.08% 0.12%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #8 Local access to inpatient care
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #9 New client index
47%
69%
66%
79%
65%
45%
79%
57%
79%
65%
46%
73%
35%
66%
55%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #7b % target population receiving inpatient services
0.003%
0.003%
0.003%
0.018%
0.007%
0.003%
0.003%
0.003%
0.020%
0.007%
0.004%
0.003%
0.003%
0.017%
0.007%
-0.01% 0.01% 0.02% 0.03%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #7c % target population receiving residential services
0.000%0.000%0.00%
0.00% 0.20% 0.40%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #10a Area per capita resources - Ambulatory services (Expenditure)
$0.80
$1.96
$1.99
$1.11
$1.46
$0.68
$1.70
$1.03
$1.03
$1.11
$0.56
$2.29
$0.89
$1.02
$1.19
$0 $2 $4 $6 $8
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Page 9 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 10: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
National KPI Charts
The 13 NATIONAL KPIs IN NUMERICAL ORDERKPI #10b Area per capita resources -
Inpatient services (Expenditure)
$6.82
$1.94
$5.11
$7.93
$5.45
$7.21
$1.91
$5.86
$7.36
$5.58
$7.63
$3.64
$5.29
$7.29
$5.96
$0 $2 $4 $6 $8
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #10c Area per capita resources - Residential services (Expenditure)
$0.00
$0.00$0.00
$0 $2 $4 $6 $8
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #11 Pre admission community care
100%
86%
100%
35%
80%
100%
75%
100%
28%
76%
100%
38%
44%
27%
52%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #12 Post discharge community care
69%
51%
38%
37%
49%
73%
47%
45%
51%
54%
49%
27%
64%
44%
46%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #13 Outcomes readiness - Inpatient
71%
100%
68%
52%
73%
100%
116%
101%
102%
100%
103%
111%
105%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #13 Outcomes readiness - Ambulatory
17%
53%
0%
45%
29%
5%
55%
0%
25%
3%
54%
0%
29%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Page 10 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 11: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
PART B
Selected indicators grouped by themes
1. Comparative resources available to the organisation2. Efficiency in use of resources3. Productivity and activity of ambulatory services4. Continuity of care 5. Access to ambulatory care6. Access to acute inpatient care7. Safety (ACHS indicators)8. Capability9. Acute Inpatient casemix - (a) Diagnosis (b) HoNOS at admission
Page 11 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 12: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Theme Charts
THEME 1: Comparative resources available to the organisationAmbulatory care financials - $ per capita
(KPI #10) 2006-07 only
$0.00
$1.96
$2.14
$0.00
$2.05
$0.80
$1.96
$1.99
$1.11
$1.46
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
Funding Expenditure
Inpatient services financials - $ per capita (KPI #10) 2006-07 only
$0.00
$1.94
$4.23
$0.00
$3.08
$6.8
$1.9
$5.1
$7.9
$5.4
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
Funding Expenditure
Ambulatory Direct Care FTE per 100,000 population
0.5
1.2
1.3
0.8
1.0
0.5
1.1
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Acute inpatient beds per 100,000 (in-scope)
1.00
0.76
0.96
1.52
1.06
1.0
0.8
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.1
0.7
1.1
1.5
1.1
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Total in-scope expenditure ($M)
$30.34
$19.42
$19.9
$11.9
$30.51
$17.73
$17.0
$11.6
$30.35
$30.37
$15.3
$11.3
0 10 20 30
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
1 2 3
4 5 Non acute inpatient beds per 100,000
1.51
1.14
0.96
1.52
1.28
1.6
1.2
1.1
1.4
1.3
1.6
1.2
1.1
1.5
1.4
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
6
Page 12 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 13: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Theme Charts
THEME 2: Efficiency in use of resources
Acute inpatient length of stay - in scope vs allseps, 2006-07 only
73.5
82.2
405.2
20.3
145.3
70.9
72.8
134.7
18.1
74.1
0 100 200 300 400
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
All o/night seps In scope seps
Acute inpatient LOS outliers (>180 days)
4%
4%
31%
0%
10%
3%
7%
45%
0%
14%
6%
14%
9%
0%
7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
Indirect expenditure as % in scope total
19%
15%
13%
23%
17%
27%
-9%
16%
23%
14%
24%
30%
13%
23%
23%
0% 10% 20% 30%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Salaries as % in scope total expenditure
73%
72%
85%
77%
77%
73%
68%
84%
77%
76%
71%
54%
84%
77%
72%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
7 8
9a 10
KPI #3 Average acute length of stay
70.9
72.8
134.7
18.1
74.1
53.5
83.7
222.7
19.5
94.9
50.3
93.4
106.2
22.1
68.0
0 50 100 150 200
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
9
KPI #4 Cost per acute inpatient episode
$67,445
$25,257
$107,856
$22,134
$55,673
$49,224
$28,288
$170,972
$23,634
$68,029
$47,883
$69,693
$75,847
$25,081
$54,626
$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
11
Page 13 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 14: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Theme Charts
THEME 2: Efficiency in use of resources (cont'd)Cost per day - acute inpatient units
$951
$347
$801
$1,222
$830
$919
$338
$768
$1,211
$809
$952
$746
$714
$1,135
$887
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Acute unit (s) - Derived occupancy
100%
96%
98%
93%
97%
100%
96%
99%
91%
96%
99%
75%
98%
95%
92%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Full year cost per inpatient bed
$484,804
$254,158
$534,786
$523,600
$449,337
$497,705
$246,763
$516,536
$508,350
$491,099
$514,000
$490,816
$466,571
$493,550
$491,234
$0 $300,000 $600,000
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
12 13 14
Page 14 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 15: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Theme Charts
THEME 2: Efficiency in use of resources (cont'd)
Average cost per community treatment day
$733
$328
$425
$509
$499
$517
$330
$287
$687
$456
$367
$827
$263
$444
$476
$0 $200 $400 $600 $800
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Full year cost per direct care ambulatory FTE
$152,679
$157,258
$151,718
$139,238
$150,223
$134,561
$148,313
$151,071
$135,238
$142,296
$106,224
$273,902
$142,452
$131,333
$163,478
$0 $70,000 $140,000 $210,000 $280,000
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
15
18
KPI #5 Average treatment days per 3 monthperiod of community care
6.4
4.1
2.9
10.0
5.9
6.8
4.5
3.2
7.2
5.4
6.4
3.5
3.7
10.4
6.0
0 3 6 9 12
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #6 Average cost per 3 month period ofcommunity care
$4,693
$1,349
$1,238
$5,095
$3,094
$3,504
$1,477
$917
$4,970
$2,717
$2,358
$2,877
$968
$4,614
$2,704
$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
16 17
Page 15 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 16: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Theme Charts
Supplementary information reported for KPI #5: % 'assessment only' episodes by ambulatory service type 2006-07 only
Org-D Org-C Org-B Org-APrison n.a 0% 76% n.aCommunity 26% 30% n.a 49%Court Liaison 57% 56% 40% 80%Consultation-Liaison 44% n.a 48% n.a
THEME 3: Productivity and activity of ambulatory servicesAv. weekly contacts per direct care FTE
18.7
15.4
11.9
9.1
14
17.1
13.7
12.4
5.5
12
20.6
9.6
12.9
9.6
13
0 5 10 15 20
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Av. weekly treatment days per direct care FTE(approx = N patients per week per FTE)
4.7
10.9
8.1
6.2
7.5
5.9
10.2
11.9
4.5
8.1
6.6
7.5
12.3
6.7
8.3
0 5 10 15 20
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Av. number of people seen per year perambulatory services direct care FTE
38.5
103.3
103.7
42.7
72
44.4
72.1
132.5
40.3
72
46.5
35.6
136.4
22.5
60
0 50 100 150
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
' Assessment only' episodes (1 treatment day) as percent of total 3 month episodes
36%
43%
47%
60%
47%
34%
38%
46%
62%
45%
32%
52%
25%
24%
33%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
19 20 21
22
Page 16 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 17: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Theme Charts
THEME 4: Continuity of care
KPI #12 Post discharge community care7 day follow up - by discharge destination
74%
27%
8%
52%
12%
100%
61%
46%
100%
11%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
To Prison Other
24C
KPI #11 Pre admission community care
100%
86%
100%
35%
80%
100%
75%
100%
28%
76%
100%
38%
44%
27%
52%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
23 KPI #12 Post discharge community care - 28 days
69%
61%
54%
54%
60%
74%
58%
82%
64%
69%
49%
35%
36%
61%
45%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
24BKPI #12 Post discharge community care - 7 days
69%
51%
38%
37%
49%
73%
47%
45%
51%
54%
49%
27%
64%
44%
46%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
24A
2006-07 data only
Page 17 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 18: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Theme Charts
THEME 4: Continuity of care KPI #1 28-day readmission rate
2.0%
1.8%
0.0%
4.1%
2.0%
2.2%
5.0%
0.0%
3.5%
2.7%
3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
2.0%
0% 5% 10% 15%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
25A 91-day readmission rate
6.1%
1.8%
0.0%
8.6%
4.1%
4.4%
5.9%
0.0%
7.0%
4.3%
7.4%
5.4%
0.0%
5.6%
4.6%
0% 5% 10% 15%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
25B 182-day readmission rate
6.1%
2.7%
7.7%
12.4%
7.2%
5.5%
10.9%
0.0%
11.7%
7.0%
10.2%
5.4%
0.0%
6.8%
5.6%
0% 5% 10% 15%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
25C
KPI #5 Average treatment days per 3 monthperiod of community care
6.4
4.1
2.9
10.0
5.9
6.8
4.5
3.2
7.2
5.4
6.4
3.5
3.7
10.4
6.0
0 3 6 9 12
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
26
Page 18 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 19: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Theme Charts
THEME 5: Access to ambulatory care
Age-specific target group as % of total people seen by ambulatory services
100%
97%
100%
87%
96%
100%
97%
99%
100%
99%
100%
100%
74%
96%
93%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Percent of people seen by ambulatory services who reside external to catchment
0%
3%
0%
13%
4%
0%
3%
0%
0%
1%
2%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
30 31
KPI #7a % target population receiving ambulatory services
0.020%
0.125%
0.136%
0.030%
0.078%
0.023%
0.080%
0.090%
0.031%
0.056%
0.02%
0.03%
0.09%
0.02%
0.04%
0.00% 0.04% 0.08% 0.12%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
27 Ambulatory Direct Care FTE per 100,000 population
0.5
1.2
1.3
0.8
1.0
0.5
1.1
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
28 KPI #10a Area per capita resources -Ambulatory services
$0.80
$1.96
$1.99
$1.11
$1.46
$0.68
$1.70
$1.03
$1.03
$1.11
$0.56
$2.29
$0.89
$1.02
$1.19
$0 $2 $4 $6 $8
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
29
KPI #9 New client index
47%
69%
66%
79%
65%
45%
79%
57%
79%
65%
46%
73%
35%
66%
55%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
32
Page 19 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 20: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Theme Charts
THEME 6: Access to acute inpatient careTotal inpatient beds per 100,000 population
2.5
1.9
1.9
3.0
2.3
2.6
2.0
2.3
2.9
2.4
2.7
1.9
2.3
3.0
2.5
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Overnight acute separations per 100,000 population from inpatient catchment target
population
2.0
2.1
0.4
21.8
6.6
3.4
2.4
0.4
19.4
6.4
4.0
1.8
0.4
19.3
6.4
0 10 20
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
% target age-group separations from your unit of people who reside outside of inpatient
catchment area
0%
5%
0%
0%
2%
0%
2%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
35
37 38
KPI #7b % target population receiving inpatient services
0.003%
0.003%
0.003%
0.018%
0.007%
0.003%
0.003%
0.003%
0.020%
0.007%
0.004%
0.003%
0.003%
0.017%
0.007%
-0.01% 0.01% 0.02% 0.03%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
33 KPI #10b Area per capita resources - Inpatientservices
$6.82
$1.94
$5.11
$7.93
$5.45
$7.21
$1.91
$5.86
$7.36
$5.58
$7.63
$3.64
$5.29
$7.29
$5.96
$0 $2 $4 $6 $8
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
34
KPI #8 Local access to inpatient care
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
36
Page 20 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 21: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Theme Charts
THEME 7: Safety (ACHS Indicators)ACHS 5.1: Inpatients – at least one episode of
seclusion
55%
18%
31%
20%
31%
34%
11%
34%
13%
23%
40%
11%
25%
9%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
ACHS 5.2: Inpatients – at least 2 episodes ofseclusion
51%
87%
63%
30%
58%
48%
12%
75%
41%
44%
65%
72%
79%
41%
64%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
ACHS 5.3: Inpatients - seclusion for more than 4 hours
47%
100%
95%
17%
65%
19%
88%
94%
26%
57%
77%
64%
93%
14%
62%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
ACHS 6.2: Inpatients – assaults
27%
21%
19%
13%
20%
19%
7%
60%
9%
24%
23%
10%
41%
11%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
ACHS 6.3: Inpatients – assaults twice or more
71%
49%
25%
26%
43%
47%
36%
59%
8%
38%
44%
77%
30%
9%
40%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
39 40 41
42 43
Page 21 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 22: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Theme Charts
THEME 8: Capability
KPI #13 Outcomes readiness - Inpatient % episodes with HoNOS completed
71%
100%
68%
52%
73%
100%
116%
101%
102%
100%
103%
111%
105%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
KPI #13 Outcomes readiness - Ambulatory %episodes with HoNOS completed
17%
53%
0%
45%
29%
5%
55%
0%
25%
3%
54%
0%
29%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
4445
Page 22 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 23: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Theme Charts
Schizophrenia and related Mood disorders Personality Disorders Neurotic, Stress, Somataform disordersSubstance abuse Other Missing Diagnosis
Percentage overnight separations included in the 2006-07 data:
Group average 100% Org-D 100% Org-B 100%
Org-C 100% Org-A 100%
THEME 9: Acute Inpatient casemix- (a) Diagnosis profile 2006-07GROUP AVERAGE
71%
10%
2%1%
7%7% 2%
46A Org-D
80%
13%
4%0%4%
0%0%46B Org-C
77%
9%
3%0%
4%
3%
3%46C
Org-B
79%
12%
3%0%
0%0%
6%46D Org-A
49%
7%
16%
4%
19%
5%
0%46D
46E
Page 23 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 24: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Theme Charts
Percentage overnight separations with 2006-07 HoNOS Admission data:Group average 80% Org-D 117% Org-B 79%
Org-C 67% Org-A 59%
THEME 9: Acute Inpatient casemix- (b) HoNOS at admissionAverage HoNOS scores by item - Group vs National Avg. 2006-07
National average based on Adults at admission to acute inpatient care
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Aggr/D
isrup
Self-in
jury
Alc/Drug
Cognit
ivePhy
sical
Halluc
inatio
nsDep
resse
dOthe
r psy
chRela
tions
hips
ADLSAcc
ommod
ation
Occup
ation
Group Avg.Nat. Avg.
47 Av. HoNOS total scores at admission
9.8
14.3
12.7
15.5
13.1
14.3
8.7
14.0
11.5
26.1
15.1
14.3
17.0
15.6
-
16.3
14.3
0 5 10 15 20 25
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
National Avg.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
48
HoNOS individual item scores at admission - % clinically significant (> 2)
25%
37%
28%
12%
25%
22%
38%
21%
29%
28%
24%
45%
29%
33%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
50Average HoNOS scores by item - Organisation comparison 2006-07
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Aggr/D
isrup
Self-in
jury
Alc/Drug
Cognit
ivePhy
sical
Halluc
inatio
nsDep
resse
dOthe
r psy
chRela
tions
hips
ADLSAcc
ommod
ation
Occup
ation
Org-D Org-COrg-B Org-A
49
51
Page 24 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 25: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Theme Charts
Ungrouped supplementary indicatorsSame day separations as percent of total
acute separations
2%
0%
0%
4%
1%
0%
0%
0%
2%
1%
0%
0%
4%
5%
2%
0% 3% 5% 8% 10%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
Percent overnight acute separations out of scope
9%
5%
61%
7%
21%
9%
6%
52%
4%
18%
7%
7%
76%
5%
24%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Org-D
Org-C
Org-B
Org-A
GROUP AVG.
2006-07 2005-06 2004-05
52 53
Page 25 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 26: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Supplementary Indicator Specs
Details on how the supplementary indicators were constructedAll reference numbers link to the numbers in boxes within the indicator charts
Ref Numerator Denominator Notes
THEME 1: Comparative resources available to the organisation
1 Total in-scope expenditure ($M) Simply adds all in scope expenditure reported and converts to millions
2 Inpatient services financials - $ per capita
Total expenditure/funding reported for in scope inpatient services (acute and non acute)
Total catchment population for in scope acute inpatient services
Indicator shows differential between funding and expenditure
3 Ambulatory services financials - $ per capita
Total expenditure/funding reported for in scope ambulatory services
Total catchment population for in scope ambulatory services
Indicator shows the difference between funding and expenditure
SIAmbulatory services Direct Care FTE per 100,000 population
Number of ambulatory services direct care FTE
Total catchment population for in scope ambulatory services
5 Acute beds per 100,000 population Number of in scope acute inpatient beds
Total catchment population for in scope acute inpatient services
6 Acute beds per 100,000 population Number of in scope non acute inpatient beds
Total catchment population for in scope non acute inpatient services
THEME 2: Efficiency in use of resources7 Indirect expenditure as % in scope
totalTotal indirect expenditure reported for all in scope services
Total expenditure reported for all in scope services
Indicator is intended to assess the extent to which organisations are comparable in what is included in the overall reported expenditure
8 Salaries as % in scope total expenditure
Total salaries and wages expenditure reported for all in scope services
Total expenditure reported for all in scope services
Indicator is intended to assess the extent to which organisations are comparable in what is included in the overall reported expenditure
9 Acute inpatient length of stay (KPI #3 )
Constructed as per KPI #3 - see Technical Specifications
page 26 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 27: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Supplementary Indicator Specs
Details on how the supplementary indicators were constructedAll reference numbers link to the numbers in boxes within the indicator charts
Ref Numerator Denominator Notes9a Acute inpatient length of stay - in
scope vs all seps, 2006-07 onlyFor in scope separations:Constructed as per KPI #3 - see Technical Specifications;For all separations: Same approach except all separations included in numeratot and denominator.
10 Acute inpatient LOS outliers (>180 days)
Number of in scope overnight separations with length of stay >180 days, reported at KPI #3
Number of in scope overnight separations, reported at KPI #1
11 Cost per acute inpatient episode (KPI #4)
Constructed as per KPI #4 - see Technical Specifications
12 Cost per day - acute inpatient units Total expenditure reported for in scope acute units
Total acrrued mental health care days reported for in scope acute units, reported at KPI #4
13 Acute unit(s) - Derived occupancy Total acrrued mental health care days reported for in scope acute units, reported at KPI #4
Number of beds reported for in scope acute inpatient units x 365
14 Full year cost per inpatient bed Total expenditure reported for in scope acute and non acute units
Number of in scope acute and non acute inpatient beds
15 Full year cost per direct care ambulatory FTE
Total expenditure reported for in scope ambulatory services
Number of ambulatory services direct care FTE
Not equivalent to average salaries - because costs are total and include non salary and indirect
16 KPI #5 Average treatment days per 3 month period of community care
Constructed as per KPI #5 - see Technical Specifications
17 KPI #6 Average cost per 3 month period of community care
Constructed as per KPI #6 - see Technical Specifications
18 Average cost per community treatment day
Total expenditure/funding reported for in scope ambulatory services
Total number of treatment days, reported at KPI #5
THEME 3: Productivity and activity of ambulatory servicesNumerator Denominator Notes
19 Av. weekly contacts per direct care FTE
Total service contacts, reported at KPI #5
Total direct care ambulatory FTE x 44 Assumes 44 working weeks per direct care FTE
page 27 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 28: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Supplementary Indicator Specs
Details on how the supplementary indicators were constructedAll reference numbers link to the numbers in boxes within the indicator charts
Ref Numerator Denominator Notes20 Av. weekly treatment days per direct
care FTE (approx = N patients per week per FTE)
Total treatment days, reported at KPI #5
Total direct care ambulatory FTE x 44 Assumes 44 working weeks per direct care FTE. NOTE: This indicator approximates av. number of consumers seen per week per direct care FTE
21 Av. number of seen people per years per ambulatory services direct care FTE
Number of people receiving one or more contacts from in scope ambulatory service teams, reported at KPI #7
Total direct care ambulatory FTE
22 ' Assessment only' episodes (1 treatment day) as percent of total 3 month episodes
Number of consumers receiving one treatment day only, reported at KPI #5
Total 3-month periods of care, reported at KPI #5
THEME 4: Continuity of care23 KPI #11 Pre admission community
careConstructed as per KPI #11 - see Technical Specifications
24A KPI #12 Post discharge community care - 7 days
Constructed as per KPI #12 - see Technical Specifications
24B KPI #12 Post discharge community care
Constructed as per KPI #12 - see Technical Specifications, except follow up period extended to 28 days post discharge
24C KPI #12 Post discharge community care 7 day follow up - by discharge destination (2006-07 data only)
Constructed as per KPI #11 - see Technical Specifications. Separate counts shown for discharges back to prison and other destinations
25A KPI #1 28-day readmission rate Constructed as per KPI #1 - see Technical Specifications
25B 91-day readmission rate Constructed as per KPI #1 - see Technical Specifications except readmission period extended to 91 days post discharge.
25C 182-day readmission rate Constructed as per KPI #1 - see Technical Specifications except readmission period extended to 182 days post discharge.
26 KPI #5 Average treatment days per 3 month period of community care
Constructed as per KPI #5 - see Technical Specifications
page 28 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 29: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Supplementary Indicator Specs
Details on how the supplementary indicators were constructedAll reference numbers link to the numbers in boxes within the indicator charts
Ref Numerator Denominator Notes
THEME 5: Access to ambulatory care27 KPI #7a % target population
receiving ambulatory servicesConstructed as per KPI #7 - see Technical Specifications
28 Ambulatory services Direct Care FTE per 100,000 population
Number of ambulatory services direct care FTE
Total catchment population for in scope ambulatory services
Same as reference 4 above
29 KPI #10a Area per capita resources -Ambulatory services
Constructed as per KPI #10 - see Technical Specifications
30 Age-specific target group as % of total people seen by ambulatory services
Number of people receiving one or more contacts from in-scope ambulatory services who reside in catchment area and are within age target group, reported at KPI #7
Total number of people receiving one or more contacts from in scope ambulatory service teams, reported at KPI #7
31 Percent of people seen by ambulatory services who reside external to catchment
Number of people receiving one or more contacts from in-scope ambulatory services who reside external to catchment area, reported at KPI #7
Total number of people receiving one or more contacts from in scope ambulatory service teams, reported at KPI #7
32 KPI #9 New client index Constructed as per KPI #9 - see Technical Specifications
THEME 6: Access to acute inpatient care33 KPI #7b % target population
receiving inpatient servicesConstructed as per KPI #7 - see Technical Specifications
34 KPI #10b Area per capita resources -Inpatient services
Constructed as per KPI #10 - see Technical Specifications
35 Acute beds per 100,000 population Number of in scope acute inpatient beds
Total catchment population for in scope acute inpatient services
Same as reference 5 above
36 KPI #8 Local access to inpatient care (% total area overnight separations managed by your organisation)
Constructed as per KPI #8 - see Technical Specifications
page 29 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 30: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Supplementary Indicator Specs
Details on how the supplementary indicators were constructedAll reference numbers link to the numbers in boxes within the indicator charts
Ref Numerator Denominator Notes37 Overnight acute separations per
100,000 population from inpatient catchment target population
Total overnight separations by persons in age-specific target population from the organisation catchment, reported at KPI #8
Acute inpatient services age-specific Area catchment population at December 2004, reported at KPI #7
Numerator includes separations from all inpatient services including those not managed by the organisation
38 % target age-group separations from your unit of people who reside outside of inpatient catchment area
Number of target age-group separations from your unit of people who reside outside of inpatient catchment area, reported at KPI #8
Number of separations by target age-group from your unit, reported at KPI #8
THEME 7: Safety (ACHS indicators)39 ACHS 5.1 Inpatients – at least one
episode of seclusionNumerator: Number of inpatients having at least one episode of seclusion, in an admission
Denominator: Total number of inpatients.
As defined by ACHS, Mental health inpatient indicators, version 5
40 ACHS 5.2 Inpatients - at least 2 episodes of seclusion
Numerator: Number of inpatients having at least two episodes of seclusion, in an admission or in a one month period of an extended admission
Denominator: Total number of inpatients having seclusion.
As defined by ACHS, Mental health inpatient indicators, version 5
41 ACHS 5.3 Inpatients - seclusion for more than 4 hours
Numerator: Number of inpatients having seclusion for more than four hours in one episode, in an admission
Denominator: Total number of inpatients having seclusion.
As defined by ACHS, Mental health inpatient indicators, version 5
42 ACHS 6.2 Inpatients - assault Numerator: Number of inpatients who assault in an admission.
Denominator: Total number of inpatients.
As defined by ACHS, Mental health inpatient indicators, version 5
43 ACHS 6.3 Inpatients - assault twice or more
Numerator: Number of inpatients who assault twice or more in an admission
Denominator:Total number of inpatients who have assaulted.
As defined by ACHS, Mental health inpatient indicators, version 5
THEME 8: Capability44 KPI #13 Outcomes readiness - %
Inpatient episodes with HoNOS completed
Constructed as per KPI #13 - see Technical Specifications
page 30 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 31: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Supplementary Indicator Specs
Details on how the supplementary indicators were constructedAll reference numbers link to the numbers in boxes within the indicator charts
Ref Numerator Denominator Notes45 KPI #13 Outcomes readiness - %
Inpatient episodes with HoNOS completed
Constructed as per KPI #13 - see Technical Specifications
THEME 9: Acute Inpatient casemix - (a) Diagnosis46A to 46D
New data submitted to allow comparison of acute inpatient profiles
46E Percentage overnight separations included in the data
Total separations reported with a diagnosis
Total overnight separations from in scope acute units as reported at KPI #1
This indicator shows the coverage of diagnostic data submitted by each organisation and provides information about the extent to which the diagnostic profile is representative of total acute inpatient separations for the organisation
THEME 9: Acute Inpatient casemix - (b) HoNOS at admission47 Average HONOS scores by item -
Group vs National Avg.New data submitted to allow comparison of acute inpatient profiles
48 Av. HoNOS total scores at admission New data submitted to allow comparison of acute inpatient profiles
49 Average HoNOS scores by item - Organisation comparison
50 HoNOS scores at admission - % clinically significant
Number of HoNOS items with a score > 2, summed across all 12 scales for all admissions
(Total number of separations included in sample) x 12
New data submitted to allow comparison of acute inpatient profiles.This indicator provides an alternative to Total HoNOS score as an overall measure of casemix severity
Based on diagnostic data submitted by organisations covering separations from in-scope acute inpatient units.For each of the main diagnostic groups, number of separations is expressed as a percentage of total separations.
New data as submitted by organisations.Group average is average of benchmarking participants. National data taken from AMHOCN Decision Support Tool, and provides average HoNOS scores for adult admissions to inpatient care (n = 66,759 cases)
New data as submitted by organisations.National data taken from AMHOCN Decision Support Tool, as described above)
New data as submitted by organisations.
page 31 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls
![Page 32: National Mental Health Benchmarking Project · 2015. 10. 26. · Health Benchmarking Project Manual. PART B - Selected indicators grouped ... 2. Efficiency in use of resources 3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022063014/5fd0e22cfa478c6932547035/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Supplementary Indicator Specs
Details on how the supplementary indicators were constructedAll reference numbers link to the numbers in boxes within the indicator charts
Ref Numerator Denominator Notes51 Percentage overnight separations
with HoNOS Admission dataTotal separations reported with HoNOS admission data
Total overnight separations from in scope acute units as reported at KPI #1
This indicator shows the coverage of HoNOS data submitted by each organisation and provides information about the extent to which the HoNOS profile is representative of total acute inpatient separations for the organisation
Ungrouped supplementary indicators52 Same day separations as percent of
total acute separations
53 Percent overnight acute separations out of scope
page 32 of 32 KPI_MasterTemplate_Forensic Services_Public release v01.xls