National Institutes of Health Usage and Attitudes Study.
-
Upload
arabella-leonard -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of National Institutes of Health Usage and Attitudes Study.
National Institutes of Health Usage and Attitudes Study
2
Key Questions
Are health information seekers aware of NIH’s research mission? If so, to what degree?
How satisfied are health information seekers with the quality of NIH health content?
How satisfied are health information seekers with the breadth and depth of health topics covered by NIH?
Do health information seekers have different expectations for the NIH Health Information Pages than they do for commercial health Web sites?
What is the context and relationship of the NIH Health Information Pages to other major health resources on the Web?
Do health information seekers have differing expectations for coverage of individual health topics?
Is there a higher degree of satisfaction with content quality for health information seekers who understand the NIH mission?
Is there a higher degree of satisfaction with the breadth and depth of health topics covered for health information seekers who understand the NIH mission?
3
Survey Methodology
• Email survey fielded to Nielsen//NetRatings MegaPanel January, 2004
• 35% response rate• Weighted n = 1,095• Data weighted against NetView Health
Category, based on Age, Income and Gender• Clickstream data based on MegaPanel usage
behavior October, November, December, 2004
4
Agenda
• Key Findings
• Online Health Market Overview
• Health Website Trust Factors
• NIH Visitor Profile
• The NIH “Message”
• NIH Content Quality
• Potential Next Steps
5
Key Findings
• Trust is clearly a key component to which sites consumers visit for health content. Because trust and brand awareness are so closely linked online, it is likely that NIH could increase visitors trust of their content simply through online brand awareness campaign.
• Since health visitors find new sites mostly through search engines and links from other respected sites, it may be most effective to develop deeper partnerships with respected health related sites to further develop brand awareness. Additionally, paid placement on search engines may be a relatively quick and effective way of building awareness and traffic.
• Clearly, building traffic should be a key goal for NIH, users who have visited NIH in the past month have a significantly better opinion of the quality of NIH content and have a much better understanding of NIH’s core message. Since consumers who have not visited NIH recently tend to look to non-search online advertising as a way to find new health sites, NIH may be able to reach this new audience through targeted ad buys on relevant health sites.
• NIH is doing an adequate job conveying it’s message to health content consumers. Improving the messaging is key for long-term success of NIH.gov. Visitors who understand the message are much more likely to be satisfied with NIH and their behavior also suggests they use the content more often and more effectively.
• NIH should also look to improve content quality in specific target areas. Overall site quality lags far behind WebMD. Specifically, NIH should improve it’s arthritis, stroke, hearing loss and diabetes content in order to meet health consumer demand.
6
Online Health Market Overview
• Beyond WebMD, the consumer health market online is extremely fragmented. When given an open ended question and asked to list which health content providers they visited in the past 30 days, 73% of respondents listed health sites that were listed by fewer than 9 other respondents.
• Not surprisingly, WebMD resonates most with visitors, with 91% of their visitors remembering they had visited the site in the past 30 days. Only 50% of NIH visitors remember their visit.
• Site design is seen as not important to health site visitors. This matches well with data from other verticals, which suggest that visitors have come to expect a minimum level of design quality on professional sites. Significant advances above that design tend not to be seen as critical.
• The more common the condition, the more frequent the search. Health category users tend to search for more common ailments, while SIDS and Schizophrenia tend to be searched for less often.
• Search engines and links from sites and online articles are the most popular way to find new health content. Only about 20% of Health category users say they find new content through online advertising, suggesting key word buys on search engines may be a more effective way of advertising health content than other types of traditional media buys.
7
Health Category Usage Metrics
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Unique Visitors
Average Minutes Spent
NetRatings NetView run of selected heath sites. January 2005
8
Beyond WebMD Online Health Content Is Fragmented
76%73%
12%10%
3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Oth
er
We
bM
D
Ya
ho
o! H
ea
lth
NIH
Ma
yo
Clin
ic
CD
C
Me
dc
o H
ea
lth
Go
og
le
Me
ds
ca
pe
Me
dlin
e
MS
N H
ea
lth
Am
eric
an
Ca
nc
er S
oc
iety
AO
L H
ea
lth
Pu
bM
ed
Am
eric
an
He
art
As
so
cia
tion
Dr. W
eil
Ae
tna
dru
gs
.co
m
eM
ed
icin
e
FD
A
Wa
lgre
en
s.c
om
Q: In the spaces below please list the health related websites you have visited in the past 30 days.
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 1,095
9
Approximately 50% of NIH’s Visitors Forget That They Have Visited NIH.gov
4%6%
12%13%14%14%
17%29%
38%39%
44%45%
50%51%
59%64%
77%91%
medicinenet.com
About Health and Fitness
QualityHealth
kidshealth.org
healthboards.com
iVillage Health
Mercksource
drugstore.com
Heartcenteronline.com
eMedicine
Yahoo! Health
Pfizerforliving
NIH.gov
Mayo Clinic
AOL Health
MedScape
Medco
WebMD.comMetric: Memory gap analysis shows the percent of visitors who visited a site in the past 30 days that remember visiting.
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) sample varies by site
10
Appearance and Diagnosis Are Not Important Factors
92%
92%
95%
90%
93%
68%
90%
32%
95%
Information is easy to find.
Information is written in a way that I can understand.
Information is up-to-date.
The site provides comprehensive information abouttreatments.
The site provides comprehensive information aboutsymptoms.
I can use this site to figure out why I am not feeling well.
Information is relevant to me.
I like the way the site looks.
I trust that the information comes from a reputablesource.
Important>><<Not Important
2%
29%
2%
10%
2%
2%
1%
2%
2%
Q: When you use a site to research health topics, what is important to you? Please rate the following characteristics on a 1 to 5 scale, where 1 means "Not important" and 5 means "Very important."
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 1,095
11
Common Chronic Conditions Are Searched For Most Often
1%4%4%4%4%4%
5%6%
12%18%
21%22%
23%25%
30%
20%None Of The AboveSIDS
Drug AbuseHIV/AIDS
SchizophreniaAlcoholism
GlaucomaInfertility
Learning DisabilitiesAsthma
Acid RefluxDiabetes
Chronic PainArthritis
High Blood PressureAllergies
Q: Which of the following health topics have you researched online in the past 6 months?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 1,095
12
Search Engine Placement and Site Partnerships Draw in New Visitors
4%4%
1%3%3%
6%6%
8%11%12%13%13%14%15%15%16%
18%19%
21%24%
26%41%
61%
None of the aboveOther
Outdoor advertising Radio program
Radio advertisementNon-“MD” medical professionals
Television programs for entertainment Educational television program
Doctor who specialized in specific conditions Primary Care Physician
General consumer magazines articles Specialized health magazines
Print advertisement Friend/Family - health care related field
Friend/Family - non-healthcare related fieldTelevision advertisements
Television news programs Newspaper articles
Online advertisementsLinks from a personalized homepage/portal
Online articles Links from health sites I already used
Search engine
Q: In The Past Six Months, Which Of The Following Ways Have You Found Out About Websites?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 1,095
13
Health Website Trust Factors
• 73% of Health category users trust WebMD for specific content they are looking for. 53% would trust NIH. Given the difference in overall brand recognition this difference is not shocking, and is likely not related to the overall quality of NIH’s content.
• NIH’s goal of being a source for information on specific conditions that are being actively researched does seem to resonate with the respondents, with 73% trusting NIH for content on HIV/AIDs and 67% trusting NIH for Schizophrenia content.
• Visitors do not necessarily look to the same site to provide all of their health related content. For example, visitors look to pharma sites for conditions related to specific drugs, portal sites for asthma or government sites for hearing loss.
14
WebMD Is By Far The Most Trusted Health Information Website
76%
53%
43%
27%22%
WebMD NIH.gov Non-NIH.gov or.Org Sites
General PortalsHealth Site
PharmaceuitcalCompanyWebsite
Q: Which of the following sites' research would you trust for the health topics you selected?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 1,095
15
Broadly, NIH’s Goal of Covering Research “Medical Condition” Seems To Be Met
33%43%
47%47%48%
50%51%52%52%53%53%53%54%
59%61%61%
63%67%
73%
Drug AbuseSchizophreni
SIDSChronic Pain
AlcoholismAcid Reflux
AsthmaHigh Blood
InfertilityArthritis
DiabetesAllergies
Hearing LossStroke
Skin CancerLearning
GlaucomaAlzheimer's
HIV/AIDSQ: Which of the following sites' research (NIH) would you trust for the health topics you selected?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 1,095
16
WebMD Is Highly Trusted Across The Board
59%62%
66%69%
71%72%72%
76%78%78%78%
80%80%
82%83%84%
86%88%89%
Learning DisabilitiesGlaucoma
AlcoholismHIV/AIDS
Hearing LossSIDS
StrokeAlzheimer's Disease
SchizophreniaDiabetes
Skin CancerAcid Reflux
AsthmaArthritis
Chronic PainDrug Abuse
AllergiesInfertility
High Blood PressureQ: Which of the following sites' research (WebMD) would you trust for the health topics you selected?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 1,095
17
Broadly, WebMD’s Coverage is Seen As More Trustworthy Than NIH
-51%-37%
-36%-36%-35%
-33%-30%-29%-29%
-25%-25%
-18%-17%-17%
-13%-9%
1%2%
4%
Drug AbuseHigh Blood
Chronic PainInfertility
SchizophreniaAllergies
Acid RefluxArthritisAsthma
DiabetesSIDS
AlcoholismHearing LossSkin Cancer
StrokeAlzheimer's
GlaucomaLearningHIV/AIDS
Gap analysis measures the difference of WebMD from NIH. Negative values show the number of NIH percentage points below WebMD. Those values that are positive show the number of NIH percentage points above WebMD.
Metric: Gap analysis between NIH and WebMD trust.
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 1,095
18
Beyond Glaucoma, Users Have Little Trust For Pharma Sites
2%9%9%
11%12%
17%19%
20%22%
23%24%24%
26%26%
28%31%
34%36%
47%
Drug AbuseAlcoholism
HIV/AIDSHearing Loss
SIDSLearning
Alzheimer's DiseaseSchizophrenia
ArthritisStroke
AsthmaChronic PainSkin CancerHigh Blood
AllergiesDiabetesInfertility
Acid RefluxGlaucoma
Q: Which of the following sites' research (Pharma) would you trust for the health topics you selected?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 1,095
19
NIH Attracts Visitors Through HIV/AIDs and Alzheimer’s Searches
10%11%11%11%11%
14%14%
15%16%16%
17%18%
19%20%20%
23%24%
32%45%
InfertilitySIDS
Acid RefluxDrug Abuse
GlaucomaHigh BloodAlcoholism
Hearing LossAllergiesArthritis
SchizophreniaDiabetes
Chronic PainStroke
AsthmaLearning
Skin CancerAlzheimer's
HIV/AIDS
Q: Which of the following sites (NIH) did you visit to research the health topics you selected?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) sample varies by condition
20
WebMD Attracts Users Looking for Multiple Health Topics
42%47%
58%62%
64%65%66%67%
69%70%70%70%71%
73%75%76%77%78%
81%
Learning DisabilitiesHIV/AIDS
AlcoholismInfertility
Hearing LossGlaucoma
SchizophreniaArthritis
Drug AbuseStroke
Acid RefluxSkin Cancer
DiabetesChronic Pain
AllergiesAsthma
Alzheimer's DiseaseHigh Blood
SIDSQ: Which of the following sites (WebMD) did you visit to research the health topics you selected?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) sample varies by condition
21
General .gov and .org Sites Attract Visitors Looking For Cognitive Disorders
18%19%
20%20%
21%21%
26%27%27%27%
29%29%
30%30%
34%41%
46%62%
66%
Acid RefluxAllergies
Chronic PainHigh Blood
AsthmaInfertilityArthritis
DiabetesSkin CancerAlzheimer's
SIDSGlaucoma
StrokeDrug Abuse
HIV/AIDSAlcoholism
Hearing LossLearning
Schizophrenia
Q: Which of the following sites (.gov/.org) did you visit to research the health topics you selected?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) sample varies by condition
22
Pharma Company Sites Attract Users Looking For Product Specific Information
0%2%
5%5%
7%8%8%
9%9%
10%11%
12%13%
14%15%
16%20%20%
25%
Drug AbuseAlcoholism
Hearing LossLearning
GlaucomaSIDS
StrokeInfertilityHIV/AIDS
SchizophreniaChronic PainSkin Cancer
Alzheimer's DiseaseAsthma
AllergiesArthritis
DiabetesHigh BloodAcid Reflux
Q: Which of the following sites (Pharma) did you visit to research the health topics you selected?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) sample varies by condition
23
Visitors Go to General Portals To Find Widely Available Information
11%17%
19%19%19%19%
23%23%
24%24%
25%26%
28%29%
30%34%34%34%
44%
SIDSHIV/AIDS
GlaucomaStroke
Skin CancerAlzheimer's Disease
DiabetesAllergies
Drug AbuseAcid Reflux
Chronic PainHigh Blood Pressure
SchizophreniaHearing Loss
Learning DisabilitiesAsthma
InfertilityArthritis
AlcoholismQ: Which of the following sites (General Portal) did you visit to research the health topics you selected?
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) sample varies by condition
24
Conditions With Greatest Gaps In Trust
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Asthma Hearing Loss Infertility SIDS Schizophrenia
NIH
WebMD
Pharma
GOV
Portal
Percen
t Health U
sers Who
Trust S
ite
25
NIH Visitor Profile
• In general NIH users tend to find health content similarly to the online population, however, they are less likely to click through internet advertisements than other groups. Since almost a quarter of health content users who have not visited NIH do look to online advertising to find out about new health content, traditional online advertising (i.e. banner ads etc.) maybe an efficient way to tap into a new audience.
• Overall, NIH users have higher expectations for the health sites that they visit than non-NIH visitors. They are less likely to find self diagnosis and site design important.
• Visitors who believe that NIH’s content is less than optimal, also tend to visit Yahoo! Health more. This skew reinforces the fact that NIH is successful in their mission in presenting higher quality content, rather than the syndicated content of Yahoo! Health.
• NIH visitors tend to research more topics than non-NIH visitors. Non-NIH visitors tend to research acid reflux and high blood pressure more than NIH visitors. Visitors who research these two areas appear to be using Pharma sites for researching these areas.
26
Almost A Quarter of Non-NIH Visitors Look To Online Advertising As A Means To Find Out About New Health Sites
20%
72%
36%
30%
19%
24%
27%
30%
59%
15% 22%
Doctor who specialized in specific conditions
Search engine
Online articles
Newspaper articles
Educational television program
Specialized health magazines
Friend/Family in a health care field
Primary Care Physician
Links from health sites I already used
Online advertisements
NIH Visitor
Non-NIH Visitor
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) NIH Visitor n = 193, Non-NIH n= 901
27
NIH Visitors Are Less Interested In Aesthetics and Diagnosis
95%
94%
65%
93%
94%
98%
96%
23%
99%
32%
comprehensive informationabout treatments.
comprehensive informationabout symptoms.
I can use to figure out why Iam not feeling well
Information is easy to find.
Information is written in away that I can understand.
Information is up-to-date.
Information is relevant tome.
I like the way the site looks.
the information comes froma reputable source.
NIH
Non-NIH
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) NIH Visitor n = 193, Non-NIH n= 901
28
NIH Visitors Who Are Displeased With NIH Content Visit Yahoo! Health More Often
5%
5%
6%
8%
9%
9%
10%
21%
21%
11%
AOL Health
Yahoo! Health
Mayo Clinic
eMedicine
iVillage Health
Medco
QualityHealth
drugstore.com
WebMD
High Quality
Low Quality
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) High Quality n = 496, Low Quality n= 382
Metric 1: Mean of the quality scores for all areas of content coverage
Metric 2: Actual visitation to websites in past 30 days
29
In General NIH Visitors Believe The Conditions Will Have A Greater Life Impact
9%
12%
14%
15%
18%
18%
19%
22%
24%
26%
26%
27%
30%
32%
36%
37%
40%
43%
SIDS
Drug Abuse
Schizophrenia
Learning Disabilities
HIV/AIDS
Glaucoma
Alcoholism
Hearing Loss
Acid Reflux
Alzheimer's Disease
Asthma
Skin Cancer
High Blood Pressure
Diabetes
Stroke
Allergies
Arthritis
Chronic Pain
NIH
Non-NIH
Note: In this study, “life impact” was used as a proxy for importance of coverage
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) NIH Visitor n = 193, Non-NIH n= 901
30
NIH Visitors Tend To Research More Topics Than Other Groups
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
SID
S
Infe
rtility
Dru
g A
bu
se
Sc
hizo
ph
ren
ia
Alc
oh
olis
m
Gla
uc
om
a
HIV
/AID
S
Le
arn
ing
Dis
ab
ilities
He
arin
g L
os
s
Sk
in C
an
ce
r
Stro
ke
Ac
id R
eflu
x
Alzh
eim
er's
Dis
ea
se
As
thm
a
Hig
h B
loo
dP
res
su
re
Arth
ritis
Ch
ron
ic P
ain
Dia
be
tes
Alle
rgie
s
Non-NIH
NIH Visitor
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) NIH Visitor n = 193, Non-NIH n= 901
Q: In the past 6 months, which of the following subject areas have you researched?
31
The NIH “Message”
• NIH is doing an adequate job conveying it’s message to health content consumers. WebMD is by far leading the industry in its ability to explain to visitors what it’s mission is.
• Understanding of the NIH message creates three distinct groups of health content consumers. Individuals with a low understanding tend to have the lowest level of education and income. Consumers with a high level of understanding tend to be better educated with a higher income. The middle group distinguishes itself by having the youngest audience profile. Additionally, overall satisfaction with the site is strongly correlated with understanding of the NIH mission.
32
NIH’s Message is Clearer Than Most, But Lags Behind WebMD
-6%
-6%
-2%
0%
7%
Pharma Sites
General Portals with Health Content
.Gov or .Org Sites
NIH
WebMD
Success of Mission Metric:
This metric is the percent of users who would trust a site to find the specific health information they were looking for minus those that would not trust the site. Therefore a negative number suggest that more users would not trust a site and a positive number would trust a site.
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 1,095
33
Not All NIH Visitors Are The Same: Understanding The NIH Message
Moderate AgeLower Income
Lowest EducationAverage Gender Split
Oldest AgeHighest Income
Highest EducationAverage Gender Split
Youngest AgeModerate Income
Moderate EducationAbove Average Female
Low Understanding Mid Understanding High Understanding
32% 38% 30%NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) Low n = 218, Mid n = 261, High n = 207
34
Those Who Understand NIH Best, Do Not Use It For Diagnosis
3%
3%
-3%
-2%
-4%
-3%
2%
0%
-1%
-6%
-3%
2%
2%
3%
3%
-2%
3%
0%
2%
1%
-1%
2%
1%
-1%
-2%
0%
0%
Poor Understanding Moderate Understanding Good Understanding
The site provides comprehensive information about treatments.
The site provides comprehensive information about symptoms.
Information is written in a way that I can understand.
Information is up-to-date.
Information is relevant to me.
Information is easy to find.
I trust that the information comes from a reputable source.
I like the way the site looks.
I can use this site to figure out why I am not feeling well
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) Low n = 218, Mid n = 261, High n = 207
35
Overall Satisfaction is Determined Greatly By Mission Understanding
41%
64%
88%
PoorUnderstanding
ModerateUnderstanding
GoodUnderstanding
Satisfied
Dissatisfied
7%2% 1%
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) Low n = 218, Mid n = 261, High n = 207
36
Good Understanding Of NIH Leads To More Time on Target Pages
5.4
3.4
4.64.2
2.8
5.7
PoorUnderstanding
ModerateUnderstanding
GoodUnderstanding
NIH Pageviews persession
NIH Durration persession (minutes)
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) Low n = 218, Mid n = 261, High n = 207
37
NIH Content Quality
• NIH should improve it’s arthritis, stroke, hearing loss and diabetes content in order to meet health consumer demand.
• 63% of health consumers see the quality of NIH’s content level as high. WebMD is the industry leader with 80% of health consumers perceiving it’s content quality as high.
• Recent visitation to NIH.gov significantly effects visitors perception of content quality, with 80% of recent visitors saying the content quality is high.
• Perceived content quality is highly correlated with site usage metrics. Visitors who believe that NIH has high quality content view more pages, take part in more sessions and spend more time on NIH.gov than those who are less satisfied with the content quality.
38
In General, NIH is Meeting The Demands Of The Online Health Population
Allergies
Acid Reflux
Drug AbuseAlcoholism
GlaucomaLearning Disabilities
Chronic Pain
Diabetes
Alzheimer's Disease
HIV/AIDS
Skin Cancer
Asthma
Infertility
Hearing Loss
Arthritis High Blood Pressure
SIDS
Stroke
Schizophrenia
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80%NIH Quality Score (Top 2 Box)
Life
Imp
act Sco
re (To
p 7 B
ox)
Mean
Mean
Over Invested
Under Invested
Low Demand
High DemandContent Areas To Focus On
39
Health Content Users Perceive Quality Of WebMD’s Content To Be Significantly Better
NIH WebMD
Very High Quality
High Quality
Low Quality
Very Low Quality
33%
47%
1% 1%2%1%
22%
41%
Metric: Mean of the quality scores for all areas of content coverage
63%
80%
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 879
40
NIH Areas On Content Strength and Weakness
-20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
SIDS
GlaucomaDrug Abuse
Schizophrenia
AllergiesInfertility
Acid Reflux
AsthmaStroke
Chronic PainArthritis
Learning Disabilities
AlcoholismHigh Blood Pressure
Diabetes
Skin CancerHearing Loss
HIV/AIDS
Alzheimer's Disease
20% 10% 0%
High Quality of Coverage>><<Low Quality
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) sample varies by condition
41
WebMD Areas On Content Strength and Weakness
-30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Learning Disabilities
Glaucoma
Skin Cancer
Hearing Loss
HIV/AIDS
Alcoholism
SIDS
Drug Abuse
Acid Reflux
Stroke
Schizophrenia
Allergies
Infertility
Asthma
Diabetes
Chronic Pain
Arthritis
High Blood Pressure
30% 20% 10% 0%
High Quality of Coverage>><<Low Quality
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) sample varies by condition
42
Recent Visitors Have A Higher Perception Of Quality Than Others
Visited NIH in Past 30Days
Have Not Visited NIH inPast 30 Days
Very High Quality
High Quality
Low Quality
Very Low Quality
19%
37%
1% 1%2%
1%
36%
50%
Metric: Mean of the quality scores for all areas of content coverage
86%
56%
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) n = 879
43
Those Who Have Visited NIH See The Content As Much Better Than Those Who Have Not
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Acid Reflux
AlcoholismAllergies
Alzheimer's DiseaseArthritis
AsthmaChronic Pain
DiabetesDrug Abuse
Glaucoma
Hearing LossHigh Blood Pressure
HIV/AIDSInfertility
Learning DisabilitiesSchizophrenia
Skin CancerStroke
SIDS
Visited NIH in Past30 Days
Have Not VisitedNIH in Past 30 Days
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) NIH Visitor n = 193, Non-NIH n= 901
44
Perceived Quality Leads To Dramatically Different Content Use
41
18
2
49
5
50
9
50
3
48
5
PageViews
Sessions PageViews
Sessions PageViews
Sessions
Low or Neutral Quality
High Quality
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) NIH High Quality n = 548, Low Quality n= 330
NIH WebMD Overall Health Category
45
Visitors Who Believe That NIH’s Content is High Quality Spend 13 More Minutes Per Month
4
16
7
17
30
7
NIH Time Per Month(min)
WedMD Time PerMonth (min)
Health Category TimePer Month (min)
Low or Neutral Quality
High Quality
NetRatings MegaPanel Survey (2/05) NIH High Quality n = 548, Low Quality n= 330
46
Potential Next Steps
• Developing an outreach strategy– Advertising strategy– Partnership strategy
• Refining NIH.gov’s message in a way that better resonates with health content users
• Strengthen arthritis, stroke, hearing loss and diabetes content to meet health consumer demand