National Health Insurance - where are we? Val Beaumont Executive Director Innovative Medicines SA
description
Transcript of National Health Insurance - where are we? Val Beaumont Executive Director Innovative Medicines SA
National Health Insurance- where are we?
Val BeaumontExecutive Director Innovative Medicines SA
“WE KNOW WE MUST REFORM THIS SYSTEM –
THE QUESTION IS HOW.” 9 September 2009
DoH Ten Point PlanGovernment Plan of Action 2009; Human Development Cluster: Health
10. Strengthen Research and Development
DoH Ten Point PlanGovernment Plan of Action 2009; Human Development Cluster: Health
DoH Ten Point PlanGovernment Plan of Action 2009; Human Development Cluster: Health
DoH Ten Point PlanGovernment Plan of Action 2009; Human Development Cluster: Health
1. Strategic Leadership & Social Compact for better health outcomes.
2. Implementation of National Health Insurance (NHI)3. Improving the Quality of Health Services
4. Overhauling health care system - improve management5. Human Resources Planning, Development & Management6. Revitalisation of infrastructure
7. HIV & AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections National Strategic Plan 2007-11 and increase focus on TB and other communicable diseases8. Mass mobilisation for better health for the population9. Review of Drug Policy
DoH Ten Point Plan: NHIGovernment Plan of Action 2009; Human Development Cluster: Health
2. Implementation of National Health Insurance (NHI)• Finalise policy proposal on the NHI
Policy document released for public Comment [Nov 2009]
Revised Policy document incorporating public comments produced and presented to Cabinet [April 2010]
• Finalise draft legislation [July 2010]• Set up National Quality Management and
Accreditation Body [Mar 2010]• Perform an audit of Health Information
Communication Technology (ICT) at all levels of the National Health System (public sector only) [final report Nov 2009]
• Draft the National ICT Strategy for Health [final Mar 2010]
NHI proposalsBrief history & progress update
Confidential ANC proposals (Feb & June 2009)• Handed to DoH in June 2009 (not in public domain)
Many rumours of a public report or White Paper in 2009,but none forthcoming and no official publication date set• Deputy Minister of Health: “legislated by April 2010” DoH NHI policy proposal presented to Human
Development Cluster on 23 September 2009 Ministerial Advisory Committee announced on 7
November 2009 to receive input and to consider comments on White paper, once released
The Presidency’s Green Paper on National Strategic Planning published on 4 September 2009 (Minister Trevor Manuel)
“Decisions on social security reform require long-term perspectives […] …getting the design wrong can bankrupt countries intwo or three generations.”
ANC NHI promises2009
Source: Proff. Servaas vd Berg and Heather McLeod, August 2009
“All South Africans (i.e. universal access) will be equally covered to access comprehensive
and quality health care”
“No upfront payment…” (at point of service)
Everyone above the tax threshold
will contribute through a national payroll or income
tax
All of this will be done within the current funding envelope -
“requiring no increase in total health care spending as a % of
GDP”At an individual level, “Contribution will be
less than what members and their employers currently
pay to medical schemes”
South Africans may choose to continue to contribute to private
medical schemes, AFTER they have contributed to
the NHI Fund
Comprehensive benefitsNHI benefit package
What is meant by “comprehensive benefits”? What is the burden of disease? (and what will it be in
future?) What will it cost? (and what can the country afford?) The benefit package will depend on what is needed
versus what the State can afford and deliver. This depends on:• Population and disease projections (by age,
gender, province)• Funding• Infrastructure• Resources
For a more complete picture, also add• Non-CDL chronic diseases• The burden of violence• Infectious diseasesSource: IMSA NHI Policy Briefs 1-7
Chronic disease, cancer and HIV/AIDS1985 - 2025
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
11,000,000
12,000,000
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Nu
mb
er
of
Peo
ple
Year
South Africa 1985 to 2025Stage 4+6: AIDS or Discontinued ARVs
Stage 5: Receiving ARVs
Pre-AIDS Population
Cancer: all sites but skin (new cases)
CDL Chronic Disease excl. HIV
The national health system is having to cope with much higher levels of chronic disease than before 1994
Source: IMSA NHI Policy Brief 6: Costing and long-term modeling of NHI
Universal accessfor all South Africans
Study by Prof Servaas van den Berg, Dept. Economics, Stellenbosch University:% of respondents who declared they were ill and consulted a health worker in past
month by wealth decile, and reasons for those who did not:
Universal access has virtually been achieved,although at low quality levels
Quality carefor all South Africans
The NHI proposal requires a proper analysis of its costs, fiscal consequences and affordability
Improving the quality of health care requires more real resources that do not automatically follow funds, but depend on management and incentives in the public health system
• doctors, nurses• hospitals, equipment
History teaches us that improving such management is difficult to achieve in a moderate time frame
Indeed “(t)he most urgent need is to ensure that the public sector is well-capacitated to deliver the envisaged services at all levels” – and this is not mainly a question of money
Source: Proff. Servaas vd Berg and Heather McLeod, August 2009
Initial costings of NHI 2009
Preliminary work, excludes administration and managed care costs. Needs adjustments for effect of benefits becoming mandatory, anti-selection effect and evolution of HIV epidemic on NHI population.
Efficiency assumption
Medical Scheme Prescribed Minimum
Benefits (PMBs)
Basic Benefits: PMBs+ Primary
Care
High Cost Benefits: PMBs+
all In-Hospital
Core Benefits: PMBs+ Primary
Care+ In-Hospital
Fully Comprehensive:
all healthcare benefits
Medical schemes efficiency: 100% of cost
156 251 224 319 334
Moderate improvement: 80% of cost
125 201 179 255 267
Presumed public sector cost: 70% of cost
109 176 157 223 234
Staff model efficiency: 50% of cost
78 126 112 160 167
Cost in Rbn (2009 terms) of Benefit Package Offered by NHI
Source: Proff. Servaas vd Berg and Heather McLeod, August 2009
Public-Private coveragecurrent SA statistics
Private Health Insurance
14.9%
Some Private + Public20.9%
Public Sector64.3%
30.2m people using public clinics and hospitalsR1,300 per person pa
7.0m people in voluntary Medical Schemes using private primary care and private hospitalsR9,500 per person pa
9.8m people using private primary care out-of-pocket and public hospitalsR1,500 per person pa
South Africa 200547.0m people
Source: McIntyre D, van den Heever A. 2007. Social or National Health Insurance. In: Harrison S, Bhana R, Ntuli A, eds. South African Health Review 2007. Durban: Health Systems Trust.
Phased Introduction of NHISouth Africa
Even if all earning an income and their insurable families are covered, only 51.1% of population would becovered
Source: IMSA NHI Policy Brief 2: Health Insurance Coverage
7,816,834 16.0%
4,503,463 9.2%
2,382,993 4.9%
4,040,079 8.3%
6,205,067 12.7%
23,906,777 48.9%
Phased National Health InsuranceCoverage: Insurable Families
Population 2009: 48.855 million
Voluntary Medical Schemes
Additional if Mandatory Tax Threshold
Additional if Mandatory LIMS Threshold
Additional if Mandatory Formal Wage Earners
Additional if Mandatory Informal Workers
Additional if Total Population Covered
Time to full coverageExamples
Twenty seven countries have achieved universal coverage through social health insurance (SHI). The development from the start of SHI legislation to universal coverage is an incremental process. • Germany: 1854 to 1988 (127 years)• Austria: 1888 to 1967 (79 years)• Belgium: 1851 to 1969 (118 years)• Luxembourg: 1901 to 1973 (72 years)• Israel: 1911 to 1995 (84 years)• Costa Rica: 1941 to 1961 but only 83.4% coverage by
1991.
Only two countries achieved full coverage in under 40 years:• Japan: 1922 to 1958 (36 years)• Republic of Korea: 1963 to 1989 (26 years)
Source: World Health Organisation, January 2004
Nature of the debateQuestions we should ask
Source: Heather McLeod, 2009
The benefit
package for NHI
Affordability for
the country
Fiscal and
economic
consequences
Quality of care
and resourcing
Single vs Multiple
Purchasers
Will patient/
consumer choice
be compromisedThe role of Medical Schemes
•Substitute and Supplementary cover•Principle cover and supplementary cover (Exempt from NHI if employer or union based)•Duplicate cover and supplementary cover (too expensive for many medical scheme members)
Be prepared to take part in the public debate
IMSA and the NHI project
IMSA is funding the work on the website and hosting the website
IMSA is funding the academic work on the NHI Policy Briefs, but Prof. Heather McLeod retains complete academic freedom
IMSA will continue to provide new links to• Government documents on NHI• Other organisations that release statements on
NHI• Academic papers on analysis of the proposed NHI
system
Web-address: http://www.imsa.org.za/
Free subscription to Email updates on additions to the website
The Role of Private Health Insurance
7 December 2009
National Health Insurance Policy Brief 7
The Future Role Existing Medical Schemes
South Africans may choose to continue to contribute to medical aid schemes but ONLY after they have contributed their share to NHI Fund (mandatory contribution)
Source: National Health Insurance Policy Proposal. Presentation to Cabinet Human Development Cluster 23 September 2009
% of respondents who declared they were ill and consulted a health worker in past month by wealth
decile, and reasons for those who did not (GHS2002-2007)
Source: Prof Servaas van der Berg, Dept of Economics, University of Stellenbosch
Universal Coverage
• June 2009 NHI proposal: “The goals of the national health insurance include... providing universal coverage for all South Africans, irrespective of whether they are employed or not”.
• Confusion in the debate between universal coverage for healthcare and universal coverage for health insurance.
• It is estimated that only some 16.4% of South Africans had health insurance cover in 2008.
• However everyone in the country has access to healthcare, either in the public sector or through medical schemes, bargaining council funds or other employer-based arrangements.
Public and Private Spend
• R11,300 pbpa for those belonging to medical schemes (this includes both medical scheme spending of R9,600 and estimated out-of-pocket payments of R1,700);
• R2,500 pbpa for the middle group (includes out-of-pocket payments to private primary care providers and government spending on hospital care); and
• R1,900 pbpa for those using government primary care and hospital services.
• But this mixes Government spend from public money and purely private spend. Need to compare Government spend in the public sector and the subsidy from Government to the private sector.
Source for figures: Health Economics Unit, UCT, Information Sheet: The Public-Private Health Sector Mix in South Africa
Tax Subsidy for Medical Schemes
• The Ministerial Task Team on Social Health Insurance estimated the tax subsidy to be R10,1 billion in 2005 .
• In 2005 this was equal to some 20% of the public health budget.
• At that stage the tax subsidy amounted to about R120 pbpm for medical scheme members (and very unequally distributed), while the public sector spend was R96 pbpm.
• This is patently unfair. Since 1994, successive groups of researchers and commissions have strongly recommended that this tax subsidy be scrapped.
• An alternative was proposed that every citizen receives an equal per-capita subsidy for healthcare, equivalent to the amount spent per person in the public sector.
Remove Tax Break and Replace with Per Capita Subsidy
Source: McLeod and Grobler, The role of risk equalization in moving from voluntary private health insurance to mandatory coverage: the experience in South Africa, 2009.
This has a dramatic impact for those earning below the tax threshold. The proportion of income may still be too high to be affordable but with some help from employer cover is now within reach.
120%
60%
44% 44%
33%
27%
15.4%
6.2%
120%
60%
44%41%
28%24%
12.9%4.8%
56%
28% 28%33%
25% 22%13.0%
5.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
Informal workers
Formal farm and domestic
workers
Formal workers below tax threshold
Worker just above tax threshold
Low-paid civil servants
Clerical and service
Supervisory and managerial
Professional
Per
cen
t o
f In
com
e
Income Group
Effect of Per Capita Subsidy on Affordability
Benefit package chosen according to income
Contributions after tax break
Tax break replaced with per capita subsidy
Transition from no Financial Protection to Universal Coverage
Source: Kirigia et al (2006) Health financing patterns and the way forward in the WHO African Region.
Universal Elements of Social SecurityTier 3
Private
(consumer protection)
Tier 2Social Insurance
(pooling and income smoothing)
Tier 1Redistributive System
(basic non-contributory protection)
Industrialized Countries combine tiers 1 and 2
Developing Countries have different strategies for each
Source: Van den Heever, September 2009
Tiered Healthcare Financing
Source: Van den Heever, November 2009
StrategicDimension
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4
Revenue General tax Payroll taxMandatory contributions
Private contributions
Privatecontributions OOP
Pooling and resource allocation
Income CS take priority with RiskCS secondary
Risk CS take priority with some Income CS to maximize inclusion
Risk CS only Ordinary actuarial insurance principles apply
Package Predominantly supply rationed
Predominantly demand rationed
Demand rationed and ability to pay
No rationing –ability to pay predominates
Purchasing Conventionalbudget planning and allocation with residual private contacting
Social insurance funds, regulated approved funds
Regulated approved funds
Regulatedunapproved funds, employers, and households
Provision Predominantly public entities with residual contracted private entities
Private providers with residual contracting of public sector services
Private providers Private providers
Potential Role of Medical Schemes
Source: Private Health Insurance in OECD Countries, 2004. As amended.
Potential Role of Medical Schemes• Primary PHI: only available access to basic health cover; do not
have public health insurance. – Principal: where social security scheme does not apply. Could be
employer or union-based compulsory schemes.– Substitute: substitutes for public cover or employer cover.
• Duplicate cover: cover already included under public insurance. Does not exempt individuals from contributing to public health insurance. Can offer access to different providers or levels of service.
• Complementary cover: covers all or part of the costs not otherwise reimbursed (e.g. co-payments).
• Supplementary cover: cover for additional health services not covered by public scheme. May include services not covered by public system such as luxury care, elective care, long-term care, dental care, pharmaceuticals, rehabilitation, alternative or complementary medicine, or superior hotel and amenity hospital services.
Source: Private Health Insurance in OECD Countries, 2004
NHI Policy Proposal June 2009
• The future role existing medical schemes
• “While the NHI calls for mandatory membership for all South Africans through mandatory contributions and social solidarity, it is up to the general public to continue with voluntary medical schemes cover after they have contributed to the NHI Fund.”
Source: ANC Task Team NHI Proposal to NEC, 13 July 2009
Proposal is for medical schemes to offer Duplicate cover.
Possibly Supplementary cover but depends on definition NHI package. Non-EDL drugs, for example ?
Implications of Current NHI Proposals
• The February and June 2009 proposals on NHI from the ANC effectively relegate existing medical schemes to a “duplicate” role.
• Those covered by medical schemes could fall well below 1 million people from the currently 8 million people covered.
• Debates around this issue tend to become politically and ideologically heated but there are strong economic arguments for looking at the public-private mix in technical terms and playing to the strengths of each sector.
Implications for NHI Debate
• The February and June 2009 proposals on NHI from the ANC effectively relegate existing medical schemes to a “duplicate” role.
• The ANC Health Plan of 1994 envisaged the creation of a National Health Service, not a National Health Insurance system. “A single comprehensive, equitable and integrated National Health System (NHS) must be created.”
• NHI (as opposed to NHS) merits less than 1 page of that 77 page document.
• Thus what was envisaged initially seems to be a multi-tier system: a public National Health Service, alongside of which is a mandatory contributory environment for formal sector workers.
• This suggests that the ANC Health Plan envisaged a “substitutive” role for medical schemes under NHI.
• This early thinking needs to be revisited in the NHI debate in 2010.
Innovative Medicines South Africa (IMSA) is a pharmaceutical industry association promoting the value of medicine innovation in healthcare. IMSA and its member companies are working towards the development of a National Health Insurance system with universal coverage and sustainable access to innovative research-based healthcare. Contact details: Val Beaumont (Executive Director) Tel: +2711 880 4644 Fax: +2711 880 5987Innovative Medicines SA (IMSA) Cell: 082 828 3256PO Box 2008, Houghton, 2041. South Africa [email protected] www.imsa.org.za
Material produced for IMSA by
Professor Heather McLeod
www.hmcleod.moonfruit.com