National Grid QA/QC ReDig Program - Northeast Gas Association · 2 ReDig What is ReDig? A series of...

27
National Grid QA/QC ReDig Program June 5, 2012

Transcript of National Grid QA/QC ReDig Program - Northeast Gas Association · 2 ReDig What is ReDig? A series of...

National Grid QA/QC ReDig Program

June 5, 2012

2

ReDig

What is ReDig?A series of Quality Control inspections conducted on gas

facilities having been recently installed or repaired (target projects within preceding 30 days).

Why ReDig?Validate internal and contractor crew compliance with

Regulatory and Company requirements.

3

History of ReDig 2004-2007 Program (Legacy KSE)

Localized initiative (LI/NYC/NE)

Region specific – inconsistent work scope design and application, varied regional results

Limited and inconsistent sample sizes – 30 to 55 sites per region

Limited audit/inspection period – 5 to 10 days in duration

Excavation and inspections conducted by outside entity

Corrective Action – localized successes, variable impact, inconsistent follow-up action

Overall lack of enterprise wide standardization

4

2008/Post Merger

Enterprise wide initiative – expanded to include UNY/DNY/NE

Enhanced sampling plan:Driven by volume of work and crews

DNY – 200 inspections

New England – 200 inspections

UNY – 150 inspections

Documented and standardized procedure involving site selection

Excavation activities remain contracted

2009 - QA/QC assumed inspection responsibilities

5

2008/Post Merger Involved Processes

New main and service installation

Replacement main and service installation

Corrosion

Leak repair

Audit/Inspection PeriodExpanded – 12 to 16 weeks

Larger volume of work for inspection

Enhanced validation of compliance findings

Standardized – Metrics, data collection, analysis, reporting and corrective action plan

Inspection Template

ReDig Template Development Process

7

Template Development

Standardized inspection template developed through “Cross-Regional” review process and deployed within all regions

Inspection questions developed in relation to specific processes, procedural steps and requirements

Corresponding guidance notes developed to assist QA/QC inspector

All inspection questions were weighted for the purpose of correctly analyzing/identifying actual degree of risk

8

Risk Definitions/Ratings

9

10

11

Data Collection and Reporting

ReDig

13

Data Collection

14

Completed Inspection

15

16

Reporting Structure Executive Summary

In-House CrewsRegional Level

NE

DNY (LI/NYC)

UNY

Individual yards

Individual inspection form

Contractor Crews Regional level

Individual company

Individual inspection form

Historical Performance

ReDig – 2008 thru 2012

18

2008 Enterprise ReDig Results –Executive Summary

19

2008 – Initial Program Findings

20

2008-2012 Overall ReDig Comparison

21

Regional Comparison: Contractor & In-House Performance

22

Enterprise “Top 10” Findings

23

Regional “Top 10” Findings

24

Performance by Yard

25

Contractor Performance

26

Summary 2008

Two regions exhibited risk of non-compliance in excess of 10%

Regulators met with Company Leadership to review program findings and expressed concern related to identified performance.

2009 - 2012 Overall company performance improved each year

Inherent risk in 2012 was below 4%

2013 Company goal is to realize potential risk of non-compliance at a

level of 2.5% or less

27

QUESTIONS ?Don Cordone Mgr. QA/QC

National Grid

(315)[email protected]