Factsheet #2: Myanmar WASH Cluster 2nd Qtr 2017

National

Gaps & Concerns

People in need / targeted

356,014 / 356,014

An additional 7,047 number of people are identified as in need due to new displacements

Gaps

A detailed gap analysis was carried out in June 2017

by the WASH cluster

A total of 44,003 people are in sites with no WASH

response/actor or are new displaced persons. Out of

these, 7,047 are new displaced.

There are 39 camps with no WASH response; 18 new

displacement camps; 137 camps with a WASH

actor/response that cannot fulfill the full minimum

WASH package and 24 targeted villages with no

WASH actor in Rakhine.

A prioritization list was done based on a public health

scoring and types of gaps. This informs cluster

response, fundraising and funding allocation.

More details on priority sites and townships can be

found on our gap analysis.

Concerns

In Central Rakhine, CMC misconduct and blockage of

WASH service delivery in camps is a major concern

for WASH including protection.

In northern Rakhine, fences were removed around

water ponds and compounds. The WASH cluster

recommends fences to be put back to avoid livestock

contamination of water ponds and to enable women

to use latrines. The WASH cluster also recommends

that WASH minimum standards are ensured for

model villages before people are relocated.

Humanitarian access in all 3 cluster-activated states

remain extremely limited, especially in NGCA and nRS

The lack of sector coordination and the new

government coordination structure without WASH

poses a challenge to bridge humanitarian and

development efforts.

Funding

2017 total required: $ 17 M

Gap to date: $ 8.2 M

A mid-year review is ongoing and an estimated additional $3.8 M is required to accommodate for needs of new IDPs displaced, cyclone Mora damage and revised WASH cost figures per beneficiary.

Below is a breakdown of funding received by INGOs, LNGOs and UN.

New call for proposals and grants were signed in Q2 with HARP, MHF, SDC, ECHO, BMZ, German Aid, OFDA and UNICEF.

Cyclone Mora damage cost in central

Rakhine amounted to 471,232 USD.

The WASH Cluster fundraised for cyclone

mora damage response in Rakhine and

managed to cover all damage costs through

the support of existing donors and MHF.

321,478

244,850

180,530

34,536

111,164

175,484

- 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000

Water

Sanitation

Hygiene

Coverage Gap

$8,709,397

$8,250,603

Funding received 2017 Gap

79% 9% 12%

0% 50% 100%

INGO LNGO UN

Factsheet #2: Myanmar WASH Cluster 2nd Qtr 2017

National

Strategic Progress

New cluster services:

WASH Cluster Partners

ADRA, HPA, KMSS, Metta, KBC, SI, WPN,

Shalom (Nyein), ACF, ACTED, Arche Nova ,BAJ,

CARE, CDN, CESVI, DRC, ICRC, IFRC, IOM, IRC,

LWF, SP, Water Aid, WHH, Malteser, MAUK,

MHDO, MedAir, MRCS, MSF, Oxfam, PLAN, SCI,

Trocaire, RI, UNICEF + Donors

Localizing the response The WASH Cluster has delivered a WASH in

Emergency ToT to 30 state level government staff

from DRD, DoPH, RRD and LNGO/CSO counterparts

from Rakhine, Kachin, Shan and Mandalay. Action

Plans were developed for trainers who will train 20-

25 township and district level counterparts in August

in their respective states with support from the

cluster.

Water Safety Plan training for the northern Shan

Cluster delivered by the cluster team.

IM training for state local partners

Leaving noone behind A practical Gender Mainsrteaming workshop for the

Bhamo cluster delivered including field visits and an

immediate and long term action plan

MHM W.G.: In addition to DRC as voted protection

focal point, 3 other partners (Oxfam, IFRC, SP) have

volunteered to be focal points nationally to move the

MHM agenda forward with the GBV working group.

Separate Protection and IASC GBV Guidelines roll out

trainings were delivered in Kachin, Rakhine and

nationally with the protection cluster.

Prioritized 8 protection mainstreaming issues to be

tackled through better analysis and standards. Voting

at state level followed with 4 final topics selected.

Guidelines to address WASH needs of persons with

disabilities and MHM guidance update are identified

priorities which partners started working on.

Inter-cluster coordination with the health cluster

strenghtned with consistent epi week data shared

Financing: Investing in humanity

Scaling up of cash transfers for WASH response in first phase and protracted situations is a highlight in both Kachin and Rakhine. Examples are the Tanai emergency response included multi-sector cash grants by SI. In protracted sites, cash grants are given to committees for O&M in Kachin and vouchers for hygiene in Rakhine by Oxfam.

An update of WASH Cluster Preparedness

was carried out in Q2 including updates of

contact list, mapping, contingency stocks,

and compilation of preparedness forms all

on the website.

New preparedness efforts for Mandalay

earthquake scenario with a WASH capacity

assessment was conducted in Q2.

The Preparedness TWG nationally was

reactivated again with Unicef taking the lead

A cyclone damage assessment form was

developed and translated (tested/used

during cyclone Mora)

Upcoming for Q3 Kachin Mid-Year Review workshop with

government to agree on a service/entry

point by the government

Kachin Hygiene promotion strategy

workshop

WiE follow on trainings after the ToT for

district/township gov’t & LNGOs in 4 states

Hosting 4 CDC experts in Rakhine to carry

out a ceramic filter post-distribution

monitoring & water quality test training

Website: organize and make cluster

standards and tools easily available

Skype group: activated with 43 active

members coordinating in real-time.

Good example of coordination during

cyclone Mora allowing the cluster to

produce a damage assessment form

with inputs in 2 hours and share with

partners before travel to the field!

Calendar of meetings and events: on the

website

Work plans and Action points from

minutes consistently updated and

shared publicly for accountability

Activated TWGs: Preparedness, M&E,

Social Behavioral Change in Rakhine

Updated tech briefs/standards: hygiene

kit, labor rates, MHM in progress,

Protection priorities, latrine design,

damage assessment

Cluster website:

https://sites.google.com/view/washclustermyanmar

Factsheet #2: Myanmar WASH Cluster 2nd Qtr 2017

KACHIN

People in need / targeted

86,900 / 86,900

RESPONSE ANALYSIS

Approximately 82 water points are required to cover water needs in sites with an assigned WASH agency. 35% of those are in NGCA camps.

This is the second quarter that the WASH Cluster collects water quality test results. For Q2, we’ve seen an increase in sites with reported water quality results from 11% to 69%. Out of those, 28% are contaminated with e-coli presence. Samples came from household and water source.

There remais approximately 1,392 latrines to be constructred in targeted active camps. 69% of these are in NGCA. Out of the total target of 4,567 latrines, 6% have been handed over.

Desludging of latrines and major repair needs are high even though it’s not reflected due to weak field-level monitoring systems. KBC, KDG and SI (NGCA), and KMSS, Shalom and SI through TDA (Gov’t) do most of the desluding services.

The current number of hygiene promoters employed are insuficcient for appropriate community mobilization and behavior change. This is a key gap as we look at durable solutions in Kachin

Approximately 4,928 households did not receive soap. About 11,310 households did not receive sanitary pads which is better than in Q1 (11,992 HHs) but a significant gap. This requires special attention and will be addressed by the new MHM working group and GBV colleagues

WASH PARTNERS

KMSS, Metta, KBC, SI, WPN, Shalom (Nyein), UNICEF,

Oxfam, Plan, Trocaire

Funding

$ 3.9 M Total funding required

GAPS / CHALLENGES

New displacements in Q2 amounted to 6,596 new IDPs

Lack of soap and sanitary pads is of high concern for the Kachin WASH response, especially pads

Sumprabum is the townshop with the biggest gap in water and sanitation

NGCA access continues very limited

Tanai township in GCA is hosting 1,100 IDPs in 5 camps with no humanitarian access

Large funding gap in Kachin affecting 3 main partners

SI through the RRM is carrying out an assessment to respond in 5 IDP camps in Mai Ja Yung (NGCA) together with WPN

HPA is implementing hygiene promotion with the local health department (KIO)

71,544

60,389

40,531

15,356

26,511

46,369

- 40,000 80,000

Water

Sanitation

Hygiene

Coverage Gap

2,089,152 1,810,848

- 2,000,000 4,000,000

Kachin

Cummulative Funding received for 2017 Gap

Contact Us Sunny Guidotti (NWCC): sguidotti@unicef.org Mee Mee Thaw (IM): mthaw@unicef.org Aye Win (RWCC): awin@unicef.org

Noah (SWCC): nnoah@unicef.org

Township WASH focal agencies

Bhamo Metta, SI

Chipwi KBC, KMSS, Shalom

Hpakant KBC, KMSS, Shalom

Mansi KBC, KMSS, Metta, SCI, WPNGap in active

camps /

township

People

targettedPartners

%

Water Gap

%

Sanitation

Gap

%

Hygiene Gap

Mogaung KBC, KMSS Bhamo 7,252 Metta, SI 2% 20% 82%

Mohnyin KBC, KMSS Chipwi 2,683 KBC, KMSS, Shalom 60% 30% 44%

Momauk KMSS, Metta, SI, KBC, WPN Hpakant 3,428 KBC, KMSS, Shalom 3% 21% 79%

Myitkyina KBC, KMSS, Shalom Mansi 12,899 KBC, KMSS, Metta, SCI,

WPN 29% 44% 44%

Puta-O KBC Mogaung 332 KBC, KMSS 0% 8% 0%

Shwegu Metta Mohnyin 89 KBC, KMSS 0% 0% 0%

Sumprabum KBC Momauk 26,522 KMSS, Metta, SI, KBC,

WPN 20% 35% 58%

Waingmaw KBC, KMSS, Metta, Shalom Myitkyina 7,352 KBC, KMSS, Shalom 0% 23% 8%

Puta-O 1,072 KBC 0% 7% 0%

Shwegu 515 Metta 0% 0% 0%

Sumprabum 432 KBC 100% 100% 0%

Waingmaw 23,883 KBC, KMSS, Metta,

Shalom 16% 26% 61%

Grand Total 17% 30% 53% 86,459 (in active camps)

95

48

53

29

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

# water points in GCA (500:1) # water pointsin NGCA (500:1)

Water Point Coveragein active camps

Coverage

Gap

KACHIN STATE (2017-Qtr 2- 4W Analysis, as of 30 June 2017)

54%38%

2%6%

Effective drainage in active camps

Functional

Non_Functional

Not_inPlace

NA

85%

5%5%

5%

Effective solid waste management system in active

campsFunctional

Non_Functional

Not_inPlace

NA

81%92%

70%62%

51%

9%

0%

50%

100%

Camp Camp_not registered

% of WASH coverage against HRP 2017 Targetsin Kachin, 1st Qtr 2017

% Water Coverage % Latrine Coverage % Hygiene promoter & kit coverage

Disclaimer:

>> Data from hard to reach area is still challenging>>One new camp " Sha-It Yang" (HH:402 , Pop: 1,813 )in Waingmaw township is added. No WASH cover in that camp.>> SI WASH emergency intervention in Sa Daung and Maing Khaung KBC 2 camps is finished in Q1 2017. It is not included in Q2 2017 4W.>>WASH Cluster partners Metta (Bhamo) , SI (Bhamo), KBC (Bhamo & Myitkyina), Shalom and KMSS (Bhamo, Myitkyina) reported for the 4W Q2 2017.

118

10

24

1

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Camp

Camp_notregistered

Nb. of IDPs Sites

Number of WASH Coverage & Gap Sites in Kachin, 1st Qtr 2017

Gap

Covered

Highlight of the 2nd Qtr 2017

* With Kachin WASH Cluster support, HPA organize to WASH actors in NGCA to prepare for AWD preparedness and response in 4 locations of NGCA where Liaza, Shait Yung, Hkau Shau and Mai Ja Yung.* SI prepare to response WASH in emergency activities in Tanai for 4 locations for newly arrival of IDPs from around Tanai Town surrounding villages* KMSS, Metta, SI and WFP conducted emergency rapid assessment in Tanai.* Kachin WASH activities meeting was conducted in 30th June 2017 at Myitkyina and discussed on overlapping WASH activities, WiE activities for newly arrival of IDPs, and WASH focal agency per camp*Government counterparts and LNGO attended WASH in Emergency Training (ToT) in Mandalary in May 2017

28%

31%

41%

E.Coli presence/absence

Fail No Pass

More info on gaps (click here)

2,421

438

112 146 221

2,146

954

50 101 75

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

# latrines (target) # latrines (gap) # need urgent desludging # needrepairs/maintenance

# handed over

Latrine Coveragein active camps

# in GCA (20:1) # in NGCA (20:1)

* Water coverage considers improved sources only. Water quality result data is not yet considered.* Sanitation coverage considers number of latrines only.* Hygiene coverage considers access to soap, sanitary pad and ratio of hygiene promoters to population .

9,134 9,031 11,574

5,193

7,369 7,472 4,928

11,310

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

# HHs covered by hygienepromoters

(100 HHs : 1 promoter)

# HHs with access to handwashing station

# HHs with access to soap # HHs with access tosanitary pad

Hygiene Promoter & Kit Coverage in active camps

Coverage Gap“This gap tracking assumes 500 people per water point, however the WASH cluster is currently adapting the indicator considering an average flowrate for contextual precision”

ECHO

HIDA

MHF

OFDA

Oxfam Emergency Fund

UNICEF

GFFO

WHH-BMZ

USAID

Trocaire

Ireland

DFATD- IHA

German Gov/Welthungerhilfe

Samaritans' Purse

LDS

MoFA Lux

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000

Kachin/Shan- Total 2017 Funding in USD as of Q2

2,089,152 1,810,848

- 2,000,000 4,000,000

Kachin

Cummulative Funding received for 2017 Gap

Factsheet #2: Myanmar WASH Cluster 2nd Qtr 2017

RAKHINE

People in need / targeted

258,376 / 258,376

RESPONSE ANALYSIS

The Rakhine WASH Cluster is reviewing the target of water points to number of people served based on an average flowrate. Approximately 206 water points are required if assuming 500:1 ratio to cover water needs. 93% of those are in villages. In reality this need is likely higher due to low flowrates at water points.

For Q2, we’ve seen a decrease in number of sites with reported water quality results. Out of 90% of sites with reported results, 63% are contaminated with e-coli presence. Those samples came from household and water source. The water treatment strategy will be revised in Q3 following the CDC mission hosted by the Rakhine WASH Cluster which will do a post-distribution review of ceramic filters and train cluster partners on WQ testing

There remais approximately 20,598 latrines to be constructred in targeted camps and villages. A new cyclone proof latrine design standard has been endorsed.

About 4,834 households do not have an assigned hygiene promoter. This is fundamental to ensure appropriate hygiene practice and handover of WASH facilities and O&M.

A new hygiene kit strategy has been developed and endorsed by the Rakhine WASH Cluster. The strategy targets households based on income and access to markets. Approximately 1,296 households did not receive soap and 1,456 did not receive sanitary pads.

WASH PARTNERS ACF, CDN, DRC, SCI, RI, SI, Oxfam, CARE, Malteser,

MHDO, MAUK, MedAir, Arche Nova, UNICEF

Funding

$ 12.5 M Total funding required

GAPS / CHALLENGES

Nidin camp in Kyaw Taw has a large sanitation gap due to lack of space and authorization to construct latrines. MAUK is upgrading the existing latrines and desludging.

SDC-Unicef-ACF conducted a WASH assessment in northern Rakhine State and presented results to the cluster. It did not target current HRP WASH sites.

Medair carried out a WASH assessment in HRP gap sites in northern Rakhine at the end of Q2.

CMCs continue to block WASH service delivery in camps requiring consistent WASH Cluster support & liaison with the government.

242,574

177,948

132,148

15,802

80,428

126,228

- 100,000 200,000 300,000

Water

Sanitation

Hygiene

Coverage Gap

6,316,086 6,183,914

- 6,000,000 12,000,000 18,000,000

Rakhine

Cummulative Funding received for 2017 Gap

Contact Us Sunny Guidotti (NWCC): sguidotti@unicef.org Mee Mee Thaw (IM): mthaw@unicef.org Mandie Alexander (interim RWCC): malexander@unicef.org

Township WASH focal Agency

Ann Arche Nova

Buthidaung ACF, CARE, MHDO, CDN

Kyawtaw MAUK

Kyaukpyu Oxfam

Maungdaw ACF, CARE, Malteser, MHDO

Myebon RI

Pauktaw DRC, SCI, SI

Ramree OxfamGap in active

camps / township

People

targettedPartners

%

Water Gap

%

Sanitation

Gap

%

Hygiene

Gap

Rathedaung CARE, SI, MHDO Kyaukpyu 1,611 Oxfam 21% 21% 0%

Sittwe CDN, DRC, MA_UK, Oxfam, SCI, SI Kyauktaw 531 MAUK 0% 85% 0%

Maungdaw 1,959 ACF, CARE, Malteser,

MHDO0% 0% 100%

Myebon 2,871 RI 42% 0% 0%

Pauktaw 15,389 DRC, SCI, SI 29% 38% 49%

Ramree 267 Oxfam 0% 0% 0%

Rathedaung 2,458 CARE, SI, MHDO 0% 15% 0%

Sittwe 101,994 CDN, DRC, MA_UK,

Oxfam, SCI, SI0.1% 21% 0%

Grand Total 5% 23% 7% 127,080 (in active camps)

244 241

191

15

100

200

300

400

# water points in villages (500:1) # water points in active camps (500:1)

Water Point Coveragein active camps & villages

Coverage

Gap

RAKHINE STATE (2017-Qtr 2- 4W Analysis, as of 30 June 2017)

Disclaimer:

>> Arche Nova is implementing WASH activities in Ann Township. MA_UK is implementing WASH development activites in Sittwe.CDN is implementing WASH development activities in Buthidaung.They are not counted in HRP Q2 reporting.>>MHDO is implementing some WASH activites in Buthidaung, Maungdaw and Rathedaung. They are counted in HRP Q2 reporting as it is emergency response.>>Oxfam WASH activites in Nidin camp have been phased out since Q4 2016. MAU-UK is now implementing new latrines construction in Nidin camp in Kyawtaw. They have plans to do water supply and hygine kits districution in Nidin camp. ACF WASH activites in the villages in Sittwe have been phased out since 2016.>>in previous quaters, we assumed that returned/relocated camps are as camps.But in Q2 2017, we assumed as non-camps.>>WASH Cluster partners ACF, Oxfam, DRC, SI, SCI, Malteser, Care Int, CDN, RI , MHDO and MA-UK reported for the 4W Q2

54%20%

13%

13%

Effective drainagein active camps

Functional

Non_Functional

Not_inPlace

NA

64%

20%

13%3%

Effective solid waste management system

in active camps

Functional

Non_Functional

Not_inPlace

NA

95%

62%

77%

40%

93%

7%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Camp Village

% WASH Coverage against HRP 2017 Targetsin Rakhine

% Water Coverage % Latrine Coverage % Hygiene promoter & kit coverage

30

211

50

8

2940

0 50 100 150 200 250

Camp

Village

Village_Not HRP

Nb. of IDPs Sites

Number of WASH Coverage & Gap Sites in Rakhine

Intervention Finished

Gap

Covered

Highlight of the 2nd Qtr 2017

* Ward 6 Camp in Ramree is officially closed in June, 2017. Most of the IDPs (Kaman ethnics) were allowed to move to Yangon. A few # of families are still living in the Camp.* WASH Gap in Ni Din Camp , Ah Htet Nan Yar Camp and Zoom 1 & NRS Villages* GAD actions in Sittwe Camps led to solve the land issues and community complains for implementing WASH facilities development in Sittwe Camps*Technical Working Group organized in Rakhine about WASH Behavior Change, Hygiene kit Strategy and review Cluster latrine Design. * Water Quality Testing Monitoring by WASH agencies* AWD data compiling and response plan supported by Health Cluster*Government counterparts and MHDO attended WASH in Emergency Training (ToT) in Mandalary in May 2017

63%10%

27%

Ecoli presence/absence per camps

Fail No Pass

6,331

1,019 931 1,652 2,477

32,901

19,579

-1,522

11,325

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

# latrines (target) # latrines (gap) # need urgentdesludging

# needrepairs/maintenance

# handed over

Latrine Coverage in active camps & villages

# in active camps (20:1) # in villages (6:1)

* Water coverage considers improved sources, and unimproved sources combined with treatment (filters). Water quality result data is not yet considered.* Sanitation coverage considers number of latrines only* Hygiene coverage considers access to soap, sanitary pad and ratio of hygiene promoters to population

More info on gaps (click here)

19,596 23,134 22,974

4,834 1,296 1,456

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

# HHs covered by hygienepromoters

(100 HHs : 1 promoter)

# HHs with access to soap # HHs with access to sanitary pad

Hygiene Promoter & Kit Coverage in active camps

Coverage Gap

“This gap tracking assumes 500 people per water point, however the WASH cluster is currently adapting the indicator considering an average flowrate for contextual precision”

DFID

ECHO

EU

GHA/German AA

MHF

OFDA

UNICEF

USA

USA (OFDA)

BMZ

HARP (DFID)

HIF2

LIFT

MdP

ZOA

GIZ

0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000

Rakhine - Total 2017 Funding as of Q2

6,316,086 6,183,914

- 6,000,000 12,000,000 18,000,000

Rakhine

Cummulative Funding received for 2017 Gap

Factsheet #2: Myanmar WASH Cluster 2nd Qtr 2017

SHAN

People in need / targeted

10,738 / 10,738

RESPONSE ANALYSIS

Approximately 16 water points are required to cover water needs in targeted HRP sites with an assigned WASH agency assuming a 500:1 ratio.

This is the second quarter that the WASH Cluster collects water quality test results. For Q2, we’ve seen a decrease in sites with reported water quality results, from 47% to 31%. Out of 31% of sites with reported results, 14% are contaminated with e-coli presence. Those samples came from household and water source. The cluster needs to identify the point of contamination.

There remais approximately 56 latrines to be constructed in active camps.

Partners report that communal handwashing stations operate well in this context, however there are 62% of households without communal handwashing facilities. On the plus side, the majority of households received soap in northern Shan with a gap of only 3%. Good job!

20% of households did not receive sanitary pads for women and girls

Approximately 33% of households did not receive hygiene promotion services in northern Shan

WASH PARTNERS

KMSS, Metta, KBC, SCI, UNICEF

Funding

$ 0.5 M Total funding required

GAPS / CHALLENGES

Access remains a challenge

Due to clashes between the Tatmadaw and Ethnic Armed Groups, over 1,000 IDPs fled to urban areas and are scattered around

There are 6 targeted HRP sites without a WASH actor/response

Namtu township presents the highest gap with sanitation gap being most serious.

Namkhan township has good water and hygiene coverage, but the sanitation gap is almost 50%

The Shan WASH Cluster is being coordinated by Unicef and SCI is providing technical co-leadership while we recruit for the new WASH cluster coordinator. We were sorry to say goodbye to Noah Noah!

7,360

6,513

7,851

3,378

4,225

2,887

- 5,000 10,000 15,000

Water

Sanitation

Hygiene

Coverage Gap

304,159 255,841

- 200,000 400,000 600,000

Shan

Cummulative Funding received for 2017 Gap

Contact Us Sunny Guidotti (NWCC): sguidotti@unicef.org Mee Mee Thaw (IM): mthaw@unicef.org Tin Lay Naing (interim SWCC): tlnaing@unicef.org

Township WASH focal Agency

Hseni Metta

Kutkai Metta, KBC-HDD-NSS, KMSS, ICRC

Manton KMSS, Metta,KBC-HDD-NSS

Muse KMSS, Metta,KBC-HDD-NSS

Namhkan KMSS,SCI, Metta

Namtu Metta,KBC-HDD-NSS

Gap in

active

camps /

township

People

targettedPartners

%

Water Gap

%

Sanitation

Gap

%

Hygiene Gap

Hseni 196 Metta 0% 0% 0%

Kutkai 4,711 Metta, KBC-HDD-

NSS, KMSS, ICRC 10% 14% 2%

Manton 320 KMSS, Metta,KBC-

HDD-NSS 0% 0% 0%

Muse 369 KMSS, Metta,KBC-

HDD-NSS 44% 7% 12%

Namhkan 1,737 KMSS,SCI, Metta 0% 44% 0%

Namtu 755 Metta,KBC-HDD-

NSS 11% 17% 11%

Grand

Total9% 19% 3% 8,088 (in active camps)

15

0

15

1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

# water points in GCA (500:1) # water points in NGCA (500:1)

Water Point Coverage in active camps

Coverage

Gap

NORTHERN SHAN STATE (2017-Qtr 2- 4W Analysis, as of 30 June 2017)

Disclaimer:>> WASH Cluster partners Metta, KMSS and SCI reported data for the 4W Q2 2017.>>New resettlement village, Pyi Htaung Su in Laukkai township facing water shortage and fetching water from the nearest village which is far away for 8 kilometres. About 1500 IDPs from 282 households facing water shortage problem

66%3%

17%

14%

Effective solid waste management system

in active camps

Functional

Non_Functional

Not_inPlace

NA

48%

4%

38%

10%

Effective drainagein active camps

Functional

Non_Functional

Not_inPlace

NA

91%81%

97%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Camp

% of WASH coverage against HRP 2017 Targetsin Kachin

% Water Coverage

% Latrine Coverage

% Hygiene promoter & kit coverage

29

6

1

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Camp

Nb. of IDPs Sites

Number of WASH Coverage & Gap Sites in Shan (North)

Intervention Finished

Gap

Covered

Highlight of the 2nd Qtr 2017

* A total of 8 participants from Government counterparts and NGO partners attended WASH in Emergency (ToT) training at Mandalay. * Water Safety Plan training conducted in 21-22 June 2017 at Kutkai and a total of 11 participants from different organizations attended to the training. * UNICEF and SCI conducted WASH assessment in new IDP camp at Poat-Ba-Yone monastery at Namtu. * Metta conducted WASH need assessment in Pin Tha Byay IDP camp in Namtu Township. * Clashes between the Tatmadaw and Ethnic Armed Groups were faced more and more and over 1000 IDPs fled to urban area. The IDP population is floating as well as conflict areas is scattering

14%

69%

17%

E. Coli presence/absence

Fail No Pass

693

56 26 26

-

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

# latrines (target) # latrines (gap) # need urgent desludging # need repairs/maintenance

Latrine Coverage in active camps

# in GCA (20:1) # in NGCA (20:1)

* Water coverage considers improved sources only. Water quality result data is not yet considered. * Sanitation coverage considers number of latrines only* Hygiene coverage considers access to soap, sanitary pad and ratio of hygiene promoters to population

More Info on Gaps(click here)

1,073

612

1,569 1,296

538

999

42

316

-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

# HHs covered byhygiene promoters

(100 HHs : 1 promoter)

# HHs with access tohand washing station

# HHs with access tosoap

# HHs with access tosanitary pad

Hygiene promoter & kit Coverage in active camps

Coverage Gap

“This gap tracking assumes 500 people per water point, however the WASH cluster is currently adapting the indicator considering an average flowrate for contextual

ECHO

HIDA

MHF

OFDA

Oxfam Emergency Fund

UNICEF

GFFO

WHH-BMZ

USAID

Trocaire

Ireland

DFATD- IHA

German Gov/Welthungerhilfe

Samaritans' Purse

LDS

MoFA Lux

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000

Kachin/Shan- Total 2017 Funding in USD as of Q2

304,159 255,841

- 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000

Shan

Cummulative Funding received for 2017 Gap