National Energy Code for Buildings

28

description

Lyle Scott NECB 2011 prescriptive requirements and compliance options as well as a review of provincial and U.S. energy code adoption

Transcript of National Energy Code for Buildings

Page 1: National Energy Code for Buildings
Page 2: National Energy Code for Buildings

Agenda

• National Energy Code for Buildings 2011

• What is it?

• How will it effect you?

• What else is around the corner?

• Building Energy Labeling

• Energy Intensity Metrics

• NECB 2015

Page 3: National Energy Code for Buildings

90% 100% 110% 120%

40%

60%

70%

80%

Gla

zin

g

Rati

o

National Energy Code for Buildings 2011

• Update to the Model National

Energy Code for Buildings 1997

(MNECB)

• ~27% efficiency improvement

Page 4: National Energy Code for Buildings

90% 100% 110% 120%

40%

60%

70%

80%

Gla

zin

g

Rati

o

Model National Energy Code for Buildings 1997

• Referenced in the OBC

• Not used by other provinces

• Used by incentive programs and

LEED

• Requirements changed by province

and fuel source

Page 5: National Energy Code for Buildings

90% 100% 110% 120%

40%

60%

70%

80%

Gla

zin

g

Rati

o

National Energy Code for Buildings 2011

• NECB requirements

defined by Heating

Degree Days (HDD)

• Energy source doesn’t

change requirements

• National Building Code

referenced for weather

data

Page 6: National Energy Code for Buildings

90% 100% 110% 120%

40%

60%

70%

80%

Gla

zin

g

Rati

o

National Energy Code for Buildings 2011

• Contains requirements for:

• Building Envelope

• HVAC

• Domestic hot water

• Lighting

• electrical power systems and motors

• Excludes plug loads

Page 7: National Energy Code for Buildings

NECB Parts

3. Envelope

4. Lighting

5. HVAC

6. DHW

7. Power and Motors

8. Performance Path

Compliance Options

Mandatory Provisions

Prescriptive

Energy Cost Budget

Trade-off (envelope)

Simplified (HVAC)

National Energy Code for Buildings 2011

Compliance Options

• Prescriptive or trade-off

requirements in Parts 3 to 7

Or

• Performance requirements

in Part 8

Page 8: National Energy Code for Buildings

Prescriptive

Simple or Detailed

Trade-off

Section 8 Energy

Performance Path

National Energy Code for Buildings

Envelope Compliance Options

Envelope

Meets

NECB

Building

Meets

NECB

Page 9: National Energy Code for Buildings

90% 100% 110% 120%

40%

60%

70%

80%

Gla

zin

g

Rati

o

NECB Prescriptive Requirements Be careful with Climate Zones!

Zone 5 Zone 6

Location Toronto

Mississauga

Belleville

Vaughan

Markham

Kingston

Window Usi

(U-value)

2.2 (0.39) 2.2 (0.39)

Walls (above

grade)

0.278 (R-20) 0.247 (R-23)

Walls (below

grade)

0.3.79 (R-15) 0.284 (R-20)

Page 10: National Energy Code for Buildings

90% 100% 110% 120%

40%

60%

70%

80%

Gla

zin

g

Rati

o

National Energy Code for Buildings 2011

• Maximum Prescriptive Glazing Ratios

• 40% Vancouver and Toronto

• 36% Ottawa

• 33% Sudbury and Edmonton

Page 11: National Energy Code for Buildings

90% 100% 110% 120%

40%

60%

70%

80%

Gla

zin

g

Rati

o

National Energy Code for Buildings 2011

• Lots of other requirements

including:

• Heat recovery on many systems

• Increased equipment efficiencies

• Lighting controls

Page 12: National Energy Code for Buildings

• NECB Coming to BC October 22?

• NECB in OBC 2012???

Page 13: National Energy Code for Buildings

Refrigerator Efficiency

Page 14: National Energy Code for Buildings

European Building Energy Labels

Page 15: National Energy Code for Buildings

REALpac 20 by '15 Initiative

• Study of 56

buildings

• Achieving the

20 by ‘15 target

will save an

average of

$1.35/ft2

Page 16: National Energy Code for Buildings

BOMA BESt Energy Report

Page 17: National Energy Code for Buildings

BOMA BESt Energy Report

Step one: Measure

Step Two: Improve

Page 18: National Energy Code for Buildings

REALpac 20 by '15 Initiative

• Study of 56

buildings

• Achieving the

20 by ‘15 target

will save an

average of

$1.35/ft2

Page 19: National Energy Code for Buildings

Architecture 2030 Challenge

• Design new buildings to be 60% more

energy efficient than the provincial average

for that building type

• 60% in 2010

• 70% in 2015

• 80% in 2020

• 90% in 2025

• Carbon-neutral in 2030 (using no fossil fuel

GHG emitting energy to operate).

Page 20: National Energy Code for Buildings

Architecture 2030 Benchmarks

Ontario Energy Intensity (GJ/m2/yr)

Wholesale 1.85

Retail 1.62

Information and Cultural 1.73

Offices 1.42

Education 1.77

Healthcare 2.04

Arts, Entertainment and Recreation 2.68

Accommodation and Food Services 2.60

Page 21: National Energy Code for Buildings

90% 100% 110% 120%

40%

60%

70%

80%

Gla

zin

g

Rati

o

National Energy Code for Buildings 2015

• Establishing a building Energy Use Index for

16 building types including:

• Offices

• Schools

• Residential Buildings

• Retail

• Arenas

• Restaurants

• Long Term Care

• Warehouses

• Pools

Page 22: National Energy Code for Buildings

90% 100% 110% 120%

40%

60%

70%

80%

Gla

zin

g

Rati

o

National Energy Code for Buildings 2015

Prescriptive

Simple or Detailed

Trade-off

Section 8 Energy

Performance Path

Envelope

Meets

NECB

Building

Meets

NECB

Page 23: National Energy Code for Buildings

90% 100% 110% 120%

40%

60%

70%

80%

Gla

zin

g

Rati

o

National Energy Code for Buildings 2015

Prescriptive

Simple or Detailed

Trade-off

Section 8 Energy

Performance Path

Envelope

Meets

NECB

Building

Meets

NECB ***NEW***

Energy Utilization

Index Path

Page 24: National Energy Code for Buildings

Questions?

Page 25: National Energy Code for Buildings
Page 26: National Energy Code for Buildings
Page 27: National Energy Code for Buildings

ASHRAE Building EQ

• Building Energy Quotient Program

• Resources for Policy Makers

• Pilot released in 2009

• Fully released in 2012

http://buildingeq.com/

Page 28: National Energy Code for Buildings

AIA Architecture 2030

Reporting