Nasirov A.K.

27
1 Role of the nuclear shell structure and orientation angles of deformed reactants in complete fusion Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions Nasirov A.K.

description

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions. Role of the nuclear shell structure and orientation angles of deformed reactants in complete fusion. Nasirov A.K. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Nasirov A.K.

Page 1: Nasirov A.K.

1

Role of the nuclear shell structure and orientation angles of deformed reactants

in complete fusion

Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchFlerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions

Nasirov A.K.

Page 2: Nasirov A.K.

2

A.K. Nasirov1,2, G. Giardina3, A. Fukushima4, Y. Aritomo1,4, G. Mandaglio3, A.I. Muminov2,

M. Ohta4, T. Wada4, R.K. Utamuratov2

1. Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions JINR, Dubna, Russia2. Heavy Ion Physics Department, INP, Tashkent, Uzbekistan3. INFN, Sezione di Catania, and Dipartimento di Fisica dell‘ Universitá di Messina, Italy4. Department of Physics, Konan University, Kobe, Japan

Page 3: Nasirov A.K.

3

Content

Introduction

Main mechanisms of heavy ion collisions at low energies

Dependence of capture and fusion dynamics on the mass, mass asymmetry, shape nuclei and orientation angles of their symmetry axis

Role of the peculiarities of shell structure in complete fusion

Conclusion

Page 4: Nasirov A.K.

4

Difference between paths of the capture and deep inelastic collisions

i

ТКЕ-total kinetic energy

V( R ) – nucleus-nucleus

potential

E*DNS – excitation energy of double nuclear system

Page 5: Nasirov A.K.

5

Comparison of the friction coefficients, calculated by different methods

D. H. E. Gross and H. Kalinowski, Phys. Rep. 45, (1978) 175.

Solid line – G.G. Adamian, et al. PRC

56 (1997) 373

Long dashed --

Short dashed- -

Dotted -

Temperatura= 2 MeV

Temperatura= 1 MeV

Temperatura= 0.5 MeV

By Yamaji et al(microscopic):

S. Yamaji and A. Iwamoto,

Z. Phys. A 313, (1983) 161.

Page 6: Nasirov A.K.

6

Reaction mechanisms following after capture:fast-fission, quasi-fission and fusion-fission.

Page 7: Nasirov A.K.

7

Fast-fission of the mononucleus

A.J. Sierk, Phys.Rev. C, 33 (1986) 2039

Lfus > L > Lfis.bar

Page 8: Nasirov A.K.

8

Potential energy surface for fusion of compound nucleus 284114

Udr (A, Z, , ß1 , α1 ; ß2 , α2 ) = B1 + B2 + V (A, Z, ß1 , α1 ; ß2 , α2 ; R)- (BC N + VC N (L ))

a- entrance channel;b-fusion channel;c and d are quasifission channels

Page 9: Nasirov A.K.

9

Potential energy surface for fusion of compound nucleus 214Th

Page 10: Nasirov A.K.

10

Nucleus-nucleus potential as a function of the distance between nuclei and orientation their axial symmetry axis

Page 11: Nasirov A.K.

11

Nucleus-nucleus interaction potential

2

1

2

1

2

2)(

2202

)(2

20

2/12

321

22121

)(cos7

3)(cos

20

9

),,(

i ii

iii

ii

C

PRPReR

ZZ

eR

ZZRV

rdrfRrRV effnucl

3)0(2

)0(2

)0(1

)0(121 )()(),,(

.)(1()(

exp1),,,,(

1

20)(

2)(2

)0(

a

YRtRrRr

iii

oiiiiiii

221

2

]([2

)1(

R

llVrot

Page 12: Nasirov A.K.

12

Dependence of the capture and fusion cross sections on the orientation angle of the axial symmetry axis of reactants

}),,,{,,(

}),,,{,,(}),,,{;,(}),,,{;,(

iiiirot

iiiinucliiiiCouliiiinucnuc

AZLRV

AZLRVAZLRVAZLRV

Page 13: Nasirov A.K.

13

Dynamics of capture of projectile by target-nucleus

dyn

dynlab LLorLLif

LLLifLET

min

min21 ,0

,1),;,(

cap (Elab,L; 1 ,2)= (2L +1) T(Elab, L; 1 ,2)

R

RR

R

RVtRR

dt

RRdR

)()(

)()()( 2

effeff RRtRtRRdt

dL2211)()()(

,22110 JJJL R

222

222

211

2 JJJE Rrot

Ldyn and Lmin are determined by dynamics of collision and calculated by solution of equations of motion for the collision trajectory:

fus (Elab ,L) =cap(Elab ,L; 1 ,2) PCN(Elab ,L; 1 ,2) {}

2

Page 14: Nasirov A.K.

14

Partial fusion cross section as a function of the orientation of axial symmetry axis of reactants

Page 15: Nasirov A.K.

15

Comparison of the capture and fusion excitation functions with the experimental data and Langevin calculations

S. Mitsuoka, et al.

PRC 62 (2000) 054603.

Y. Aritomo, M. Ohta, Nucl.Phys. A744

(2004) 3

Page 16: Nasirov A.K.

16

Quasifission cross sections as a function of the orientation angles of colliding nuclei

Page 17: Nasirov A.K.

17

Dependence of the fusion and quasifission cross sections on the orientations of colliding nuclei

Nasirov A.K. et al

Nucl. Phys.A759 (2005) 342

Page 18: Nasirov A.K.

18

Comparison capture and fusion cross sections for the 16O+238U reaction

There is quasifission

Hinde et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.

74 (1995) 1295

There is not quasifission

K. Nishio et al., Phys.Rev.Lett.

93 (2004) 162701

Nasirov A.K. et al

Nucl. Phys.A759 (2005) 342

Page 19: Nasirov A.K.

19

Dependence of the driving potential (а) and quasifission barrier (b) on the mutual orientations of the axial symmetry axes of nuclei

Page 20: Nasirov A.K.

20

The role of the entrance channel and shell structure of reactants at formation of the evaporation residues in reactions leading to the same compound nucleus 216Th:a) Capture b) Complete fusionc) Evaporation residuescross sections.

Page 21: Nasirov A.K.

21

Driving potential Udriving ( c ) for reactions 40Ar+172Hf, 86Kr+130Xe, 124Sn+92Zr leading to formation of compound nucleus 216Th :

Udriving=B1+B2-B(1+2)+V( R )

Due to peculiarities of shell structure Bfus (Kr) > Bfus (Kr) and, consequently,

fus (Kr+Xe) < fus(Zr+Sn)

Page 22: Nasirov A.K.

22

Angular momentum distribution for the complete fusion σfus

(L) (Elab) as

a function of momentum and and beam energy for reactions leading

to formation of 216Th.

G. Fazio, et al., Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 388, 2509 (2003).

Page 23: Nasirov A.K.

23

Effect of the entrance channel on the fission branching ratio of the excited compound nucleus 220Th

Comparison of the fusion and evaporation residue (total neutron emissions) cross sectionsfor the 16O+204Pb (I) and 124Sn+96Zr (II) reactions.

Comparison of the fission branching ratio Γf / Γtot for the 16O+204Pb (red) and 124Sn+96Zr (blue) reactions

G. Fazio, .., Nasirov A.K., et al. Eur. Phys. Jour. A, 2005

Page 24: Nasirov A.K.

24

Fusion angular momentum distribution for the reaction 16O+204Pb и 96Zr+124Sn

Page 25: Nasirov A.K.

25

Conclusions

1. An advantage of the orientation angles 60o < α <90o for observation maximum values of fusion cross section is demonstrated by the analysis of dependence of the capture dynamics and fusion and quasifission barriers on the orientation of the axial symmetry axis of reactants.

2. The results of calculation showed that increase of beam energy leads only to involving of the larger orientation angles. If the colliding nuclei undergo the ``tip-tip" collisions only an increase of the beam energy does not lead to increase fusion cross section.

3. The angular momentum of the compound nucleus depends strongly on the dynamics of capture and peculiarities of shell structure at transformation of the dinuclear system into compound nucleus.

Page 26: Nasirov A.K.

26

THANK YOU

I am grateful to the Poland – Russian Bogoliubov - Infeld Program for the support my participation in this Workshop.

Page 27: Nasirov A.K.

27

Evaporation residue for 48Ca+249Cf reaction