Nash Equilibrium

21
Nash Equilibrium Econ 171

description

Nash Equilibrium. Econ 171. Suggested Viewing. A Student’s Suggestion: Video game theory lecture Open Yale Economics Ben Pollack’s Game Theory Lectures http://oyc.yale.edu/economics/game-theory/. Monte Hall Problem. Let’s Draw a Game Tree. HW Problem 2.11. Perfect Recall?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Nash Equilibrium

Page 1: Nash Equilibrium

Nash Equilibrium

Econ 171

Page 2: Nash Equilibrium

Suggested Viewing

A Student’s Suggestion:Video game theory lectureOpen Yale EconomicsBen Pollack’s Game Theory Lectures

http://oyc.yale.edu/economics/game-theory/

Page 3: Nash Equilibrium

Monte Hall Problem

Let’s Draw a Game Tree

Page 4: Nash Equilibrium

HW Problem 2.11

Perfect Recall?

Page 5: Nash Equilibrium

Clicker Question 1:

6,0 3,2 4,12,3 2,3 2,81,1 2,0 5,2Player 1

Strategy A1

Strategy B1

Strategy C1

Strategy A2 Stategy B2 Strategy C2

Is the outcome where Player 1 plays B1 and Player 2 plays C2 a Nash equilibrium?A) YesB) No

Page 6: Nash Equilibrium

Clicker Question 2:

6,0 3,2 4,12,3 2,3 2,81,1 2,0 5,2Player 1

Strategy A1

Strategy B1

Strategy C1

Strategy A2 Stategy B2 Strategy C2

Is the outcome where Player 1 plays A1 and Player 2 plays B2 a Nash equilibrium?A) YesB) No

Page 7: Nash Equilibrium

Clicker Question 3:

6,0 3,2 4,12,3 2,3 2,81,1 2,0 5,2Player 1

Strategy A1

Strategy B1

Strategy C1

Strategy A2 Stategy B2 Strategy C2

Does this game have more than one Nash equilibrium?A) YesB) No

Page 8: Nash Equilibrium

Definition

A strategy profile is a Nash Equilibrium if each player’s strategy maximizes his payoff given the strategies used by the other players.

Page 9: Nash Equilibrium

Best response mapping

Best response for a player is a mapping from actions by the others to the action (or actions) that maximizes the player’s payoffs given the actions of the others.

Page 10: Nash Equilibrium

Battle of Sexes

2,1 0,0

0,0 1,2

Bob

Alice

Movie A

Movie B

Movie A

Movie B

BRA(A)=ABRA(B)=B

BRB(A)=ABRB(B)=B

Page 11: Nash Equilibrium

Prisoners’ Dilemma Game

10, 10 0, 11

11, 0 1, 1

Cooperate Defect

Cooperate

Defect

PLAyER 1

Player 2

Page 12: Nash Equilibrium

Best Responses and Nash Equilibria for this game?

BR2(a)=z BR1(w)=bBR2(b)={w,x,z} BR1(x)=bBR2(c)=y BR1(y)=bBR2(d)={y,z} BR1(z)={a,d}

Page 13: Nash Equilibrium

Find Nash equilibria for these games

• Chicken• Pure coordination (Driving Game)

Page 14: Nash Equilibrium

How many Nash equilibria?

There might be just one.There might be more than one.There might not be any.

Page 15: Nash Equilibrium

Rock, Paper Scissors, Where is Nash equilibrium?

Page 16: Nash Equilibrium

The Romney game?

Textbook example. 3 candidates. Winner takes all. Strategy positive effort +1 for self or negative effort -2 for smeared candidate.Starting point. Candidate 1 has initial score 2, candidates 2 and 3 have initial scores 0. Nash equilibria. All positive. Candidates 2 and 3 both smear 1.Other Nash equilibria?

Page 17: Nash Equilibrium

When is Nash equilibrium “the right answer”?

1. Players are “rational”. Each player’s strategy maximizes his payoff, given his beliefs about the strategies used by the other players.

2. Each player’s beliefs about the other players’ strategies are correct.

When is 2) a reasonable assumption?

Page 18: Nash Equilibrium

3-Hunter Stag Hunt

2,2,2 0,1,0

1,0,0 1,1,0

Hunter 3 does Stag Hunter 3 does Hare

Hunter 2

Stag Hare

Stag

Hare

Hunter 1

0,0,1 0,1,1

1,0,1 1,1,1

Hunter 2

Stag

Hare

Stag Hare

Find the Nash equilibria

Hunter 1

Page 19: Nash Equilibrium

Weakly dominated strategies?

• Nobody will use a strictly dominated strategy in Nash equilibrium.

• If there is a strictly dominant strategy for all players, it is a Nash equilibrium. (example Prisoners’ Dilemma.)

• Nash equilibrium does not exclude possibility of using a weakly dominated strategy. (A voting example with unanimous preferences.)

Page 20: Nash Equilibrium

Nash and domination

Every Nash equilibrium survives the iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies.

Not every outcome that satisfies the iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies is a Nash equilibrium.

Page 21: Nash Equilibrium

Clicker Question:What are the Nash Equilibria for this game?

A) Player 1 plays a and Player 2 plays z.B) Player 1 plays d and Player 2 plays z.C) Player 1 plays b and Player 2 plays y.D) Both outcomes A) and B) are Nash equilibria.E) All three outcomes A), B), and C) are Nash

equilibria.

4,1