NASALINVOL VEMENTIN CUT ANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

download NASALINVOL VEMENTIN CUT ANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

of 5

Transcript of NASALINVOL VEMENTIN CUT ANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

  • 7/28/2019 NASALINVOL VEMENTIN CUT ANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

    1/5

    ABSTRACT

    Objective:To determine the frequency of nasal involvement in cutaneous leishmaniasis and to studydemographic and clinical pattern of disease involving nose as well as nasal mucosa.

    Materi al and M ethods:Patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis presented to leishmaniasis clinic situated inthe Basic Health Unit for Afghan refugees at Sarai Gambeela, District Lakki Marwat from January 1, 2009to December 31, 2009 were registered. The patients were diagnosed clinically and confirmed by laboratorydemonstration of parasite in a giemsa stained smear prepared from the lesion. Those having lesions

    primar ily on nose, irrespective of age and gender were included in the study. All those cases with primar ylesion elsewhere over face and seconda rily involving nose (creeping lesion) were excluded. All importantclinical details were recorded on a specially designed proforma and patients were given a registration cardfor the purpose of treatment and follow up visits.

    Results:Sixty seven out of 682 (9.82%) cases of nasal leishmanisis were encountered. Male to female ratiowas 2:1. Forty nine (73.13%) had solitary lesions and among these fourty four (65.67%) had lesionslimited to their nose. Wet type cutaneous leishmaniasis was seen in 19 (28.36) cases. Seventy three percentof sufferers were less than 30 years of age.

    Conclusion:Cutaneous leishmaniasis is endemic in Distt. Lakki Marwat. Nose was a common site ofinvolvement. In endemic areas, it should be included in the differential diagnosis of nasal lesions.

    Key words:Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), Nose.

    Old world and new world CL encompass aINTRODUCTIONdiversity of clinical manifestations usually

    Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a groupevolving from papules to nodules, which then

    of parasitic diseases transmitted by sand fly vectorulcerate centrally to leave a raised indurated

    13,4and affecting 15 million people worldwide . Most border (Fig. 1). The mucosal form usually occurs

    cases of localized CL come from Afghanistan, after an initial cutaneous infection and maySaudi Arabia, Syria, Iran and America. Pakistan progress to dest ruct ion of mucosa and even

    5,6also has a considerable number of leishmaniasis cartilage. . CL typically occurs on exposed partscases, both cutaneous and visceral. Prevalence has of the body and nose being projected and non

    been estimated at 2.7% in the northwestern part of motile part of the face is most vulnerable for sandthe country. Incidence in Pakistan has been fly bite. Nasal mucosa and nasopharynx areestimated at 4.6 cases /1000 persons/year over the involved as a part of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.

    2

    Lesions in the mucocutaneous stage range fromlast 10 years . Humans and a wide range of s imple oedema to l a rge d i s f i gur ing and vertebrates serve as reservoirs of infection. Threenoduloulcerative plaques that can lead to nasaldominant clinical forms of the disease are

    7,8,9obstruction, epistaxis and septal perforation .recognized; cutaneous, mucosal and visceral

    3,4leishmsnisis . In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa the disease With the increase in international travel,

    11 23is reported from district Dir , Kohat and Afghan immigration, overseas military exercises and HIVrefugee settlements. In Afghanistan and Pakistan infection, CL is becoming more prevalenttwo leishmania species; L-tropica causing dry type throughout the world. Over the past few years,of lesions and L-major producing wet type of spread of CL has been reported from all over the

    24lesions are mainly seen . Pakistan. This includes discovering of new foci of

    ORIGIN AL ARTICLE

    202PM I

    NASAL INVOLVEMENT IN CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

    District Head Quarter Hospital Lakki Marwat,Department of Orthopaedics and Dermatology, PGMI Peshawar - Pakistan

    Muhammad Ismail Khan, Mumtaz Muhammad, Waliullah khan, Nadir Khan,Sahibzada Mehmood Noor

  • 7/28/2019 NASALINVOL VEMENTIN CUT ANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

    2/5

    10,11,12CL as well as increased number of cases being

    13-17reported from the known endemic regions .

    The Population of District Lakki Marwatcomprises of Marwat and Bettani tribes as mainethnic origins. Afghan refugees are also living inthousands dispersed throughout the district. DuringSoviet occupation of Afghanistan, millions ofAfghan refugees came to Pakistan. Like otherareas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa a refugee camp wasestablished at Sarai Gambeela Distt. LakkiMarwat. Hundreds of Afghan refugee families arestill living here. These war related population /movements and environmental destruction havecaused a large increase in the CL prevalence inlocal population.

    Due to increase in the prevalence ofcutaneous leishmaniasis in the Afghan refugeesand local population, a leishmaniasis clinic wasestablished in 1997 at BHU for Afghan refugees atAfghan refugee camp Sarai Gambeela, Distt. LakkiMarwat. Patients are diagnosed on the basis ofsmear for parasites and treated with pentavalentantimonial compounds free of cost. ProjectDirectorate Health provides health facilities toAfghan refugees living in Afghan refugee camp at

    and eighty two patients with clinically suspectedSarai Gambeela.

    leishmaniasis presenting to the leishmaniasis clinicof BHU Sarai Gambeela Lakki Marwat wereThe present study was aimed to determineregistered. Diagnosis was made on the basis ofthe frequency of nasal leishmaniasis and to

    cl inical characterist ics of the lesions anddescribe the demographic and clinical pattern ofpatients with nasal leishmaniasis presenting to l a b o r a t o r y d e m o n s t r a t i o n o f l e i s h m a n i aleishmaniasis clinic at BHU Sarai Gambeela, Distt: trophozoites bodies in a Giemsa-stained smearLakki Marwat. from the edge of the lesion. Smear examination is

    the earliest and sole method to confirm the clinicalMATERIAL AND METHODS diagnosis in an endemic area. In our study only

    smear positive cases were included in the study.This study was carr ied out in theThe smear was processed and examined byleishmaniasis clinic at BHU Sarai Gambeela for

    pa tholog is t posted at Dist rict Head Quar tersAfghan refugees District Lakki Marwat fromHospital Lakki as per following procedure.January to December 2009 (Fig. 2). Six hundred

    203PM I

    NASAL INVOLVEMENT IN CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

    Figure 1: Distribution of Old world and New World CL

    Figure 2:

    Distt. Lakki Marwat

    Map of Pakistan showing

  • 7/28/2019 NASALINVOL VEMENTIN CUT ANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

    3/5

    Specimen from the lesion is put on a slide All the cases were registered and a card was

    and is allowed to dry. It is fixed with methanol issued for the purpose of treatment and follow up.Pat ients were t rea ted according to WHOand is again dried in air. I ml of Giemsa stainrecommendations with Sodium Stibogluconate.stock solution is diluted in 10 ml of distilled

    water. This diluted giemsa stain is poured on theRESULTSslide. After 15-30 minutes the slide is washed with

    tap water and is dried in the air. The slide is then A Total of six hundred and eighty twoexamined under microscope.

    pat ients were registered as cases of CL fromJanuary to December 2009. Out of those, 67All those patients having lesions solely or(9.82%) were found to have nasal cutaneous orprimarily on nose were enrolled as cases of nasalmucocutaneous lesions. There were 44 (65.67%)CL and included in the study after obtainingmales and 23 (34.33%) females. Although diseaseinformed consent from each patient. Thosewas prevalent in all age groups but it was morepatients having isolated lesions else where on the

    nd rd common in 2 (31.34%) and 3 decade (25.37%)body as well as on the nose were also included.of life. The duration of lesions ranged from 4All those patients were excluded from the studyw e e k s t o 1 2 w e e k s . F a m i l y h i s t o r y o f who either refused to participate or they had skinleishmaniasis was positive in 13 (19.40%) patients.lesions that looked like bacterial infectionsOnly 17 (25.37%) patients had knowledge of the(furuncles, impetigo and erythema) and resolveddisease while other 11 (16.40%) patients gave

    after a short course of antibiotics. Clinical featureshistory of using protective measures like nets and

    including age, gender, nationality, duration of themosquito repellant oils.

    lesion, family history, use of protective measuresand awareness of the disease were recorded on a Majority of the patients were localbelonging to Marwat tribe (46.26%) and Betanniregister. The clinical patterns of the lesions were

    tribe (28.35%) whereas 17 (25.37%) patients wererecorded in all cases and subsequently categorized.

    204PM I

    NASAL INVOLVEMENT IN CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

    Table 1: Demographic features of patients with nasalcutaneous leishamaniasis (n=67)

    ParametersNumber of

    patientsPercentage

    GenderMaleFemale

    4423

    65.67%34.33 %

    Age groups(years)0-1011-20

    21-3031-4041-5051-60

    1121

    17110403

    16.41%31.34%

    25.37%16.41%5.97%4.47%

    Ethnic OriginMarwatBetanniMahajirs

    311917

    46.26%28.35)%

    25.37%

    Family HistoryPositive

    Negative1354

    9.40%

    80.60%

    Use of protective measuresUsing

    Not using1156

    16.40%83.60%

    Awareness of the diseaseYes

    No1750

    25.37%74.63%

    Duration of the lesions (weeks)0- 45-8> 8

    212709

    31.34%40.29%13.43%

    Geographical originUrbanRural

    0760

    10.44%89.55%

  • 7/28/2019 NASALINVOL VEMENTIN CUT ANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

    4/5

    Afghan refugees. It was noted in our study that the weeks. Nasal affliction could possibly be due todisease was more common in rural population the fact that nose is the most projected part of face(89.55%) as compared to urban (10.44%) and its inability to avoid sand fly bite by moving

    population. Wet type of leishmaniasis was seen in it away and is easily accessible site for its bite. In

    our study, both types of cutaneous leishmaniasis48 (71.64%) patients while dry type was noted inwere seen, although wet type of lesions were more19 (28.36%) patients. Forty nine (73.13%) patientscommon i.e; 71.64%. This is also supported byhad single lesion and among these, forty four

    22(65.67%) had lesions limited to their nose. In 11 Rab et al . Other studies from Sadda Kurram

    13 23(16.14%) patients, nasal lesions also extended to Agency and from Multan reported dry type ofthe adjoining areas i.e. cheeks and upper lip. In 10 lesions. The occurrence of both types of cutaneous

    leishmaniasis may be due to presence of L-major(14.92%) patients isolated lesions were found onas well as L-tropica in this region.the nose as well as other parts of the body i.e.

    legs, trunk and hands. Three (4.47%) patients hadAlmost all the patients were from Distt.

    mucocutaneous type of lesions i.e. involving nasalLakki Marwat which signifies that the disease is

    mucosa in addition to cutaneous affliction.endemic. It was noted in our study that the diseasewas more common in rural population as comparedDISCUSSIONto urban population as 89.55% and 10.45%. Due to

    Outbreaks of CL have been reported from lack of facilities and trained personal, the diseaseseveral areas of the world including Pakistan. Such is under diagnosed, therefore a high clinicalout breaks have largely been reported from suspicion should always be observed whilenorthern areas of Pakistan especially with the encountering various lesions on nose that do not

    11-14arrival of Afghan refugees . Mostly the reason respond to appropriate conventional therapies.has been the settlement of a large population in the

    CONCLUSION18natural habitat of Sand fly . The present out breakcan be linked to large-scale influx of Afghan Cutaneous leishmaniasis is endemic inrefugees across the border. Initially the disease was Distt. Lakki Marwat where thousands of Afghanlocalized to Afghan refugees but gradually it refugees are living. Nasal leishmaniasis is a

    common form of CL. Dermatologists andinvolved the local population, which was non-otolaryngologists should keep it in mind whenimmune to the disease as reported from other parts

    19 examining lesions of the nose especially inof country .endemic areas, as early diagnosis and prompt

    In literature many isolated case reports of treatment significantly reduce morbidity related to7,8,20,21

    primary nasal involvement in CL are avai lable the disease.but there has been only one case series describingvarious clinical patterns of nasal involvement by REFRENCES

    24Bari AU et al . In our study frequency of nasalinvolvement in CL is 9.82% but the study fromMuzzafarabad shows 29% nasal involvement in

    24CL . In our study it was noted that the commonvictims were children, adolescents and youngadults. The duration of lesions ranged from 4 to 12

    1. Desjeux P. Human leishmaniasis: epidemiologyand public health aspects. World Health Stat Q1992;45:267-75.

    2. Kolaczinsk i J , Brooker S, Reyburn H ,Rowland M. Epidemiology of anthroponotic

    205PM I

    NASAL INVOLVEMENT IN CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

    Table 2: Var ious clinical patterns of nasal cutaneous leishmaniasis (n=67)

    ParametersNumber of

    PatientsPercentage

    Clinical type of the lesion

    Wet

    Dry

    48

    19

    71.64%

    28.36%

    No of Lesion

    12

    >2

    491305

    73.13%19.40%

    7.50%

    Site of Lesions

    Nose only (Solitary lesion)

    Nose and other areas of face

    Nose and other parts of body other than face

    Mucocutaneous

    44

    11

    10

    03

    65.67%

    16.14%

    4.92%

    4.97%

  • 7/28/2019 NASALINVOL VEMENTIN CUT ANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

    5/5

    cutaneous leishmaniasis in Afghan refugee 14. Pa th a n GM , So o mr o FR . Cu ta ne o usleishmaniasis in a village of mountainous beltcamps in North West Pakistan. Trans R Socof Larkana District. J Pak Assoc DermaTrop Med Hyg 2004;98:373-8.

    2001;11:16-9.3. H e rw a l dt B L. L ei s h ma n i as i s . L a n ce t

    1999;354:1191-9. 15. Rahman S, Bari lA. Laboratory profile inpa ti en ts of cu tane ous le ishman iasi s from

    4. Dedet JP, Pratlong F. Leishmaniasis. In: Cookvarious regions of Pakistan. J Coll Physicians

    GC, Zumla A, editors. Manson Tropical

    Surg Pak 2003;13:313-6.Diseases. 21st ed. London: WB Saunders;2003. p. 1339-64. 16. Jafferay M, Nighat R. Cutaneous leishmaniasis

    in Pakistan. Int J Dermatol 2001;40:159.5. Hapburn NE. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: an overview. J Postgrad Med 2003;49:50-4. 17. ul Bari A, ber Rahman S. Correlation of

    clinical, histological and microbiological6. Murray HW, Berman JD, Davies CR, Saraviaf i n d i n g s i n 6 0 c a s e s o f c u t a n e o u sNG. Advances in leishmaniasis . Lancetleishmaniasis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol2005;366:1561-77.Leprol 2006;72:28-32.

    7. Vernham GA, Sadiq H, Mallon EA. Nasal18. Brooker S, Muhammad N, Adil K, Agha S,leishmaniasis. J Laryngol Otol 1993;107:834-

    Reithinger R, Rowland M, et al. Leishmaniasis6.in refugee and local Pakistani populations.

    8. Boaventura VS, Cafe V, Costa J, Oliveira F, Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1681-4.Bafica A, Rosato A, et al. Concomitant early

    19. Rowland M, Munir A, Durrani N, Noyes H,mucosal and cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil.Reyburn H. An outbreak of cutaneousAm J Trop Med Hyg 2006;75:267-9.leishmaniasis in an Afghan refugee settlement

    9. Di Lella F, Vincenti V, Zennaro B, Afeltra A, in north-west Pakistan. Trans R Soc Trop MedBaldi A, Giordano D, et al. Cutaneous Hyg 1999;93:133-6.leishmaniasis: report of a case with massive

    20. S haree f MM, Tro t t e r MI , Cu l l an RJ .involvment of nasal, pharyngeal and laryngealLeishmaniasis of the nasal cavity: a casem u c o s a . I n t J O r a l M a x i l l o f a c S u r greport. J Laryngol Otol 2005;119:1015-7.2006;35:870-2.

    21. Patuano E, Carrat X, Drouet Y, Barnabe D,10. Rahman SB, Bari AU, Khan AA. A new focusVincey P , Brethel t B . Mucocutaneousof cutaneous leishmaniasis in Pakistan. J Pakleshimaniasis in otorhinolaryngology. AnnAssoc Derma 2003;13:3-6.Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1993;110:415-9

    11. Rahim F, Jamal S, Raziq F, Uzair M, Sarwar

    22. Mashood AM. Diagnostic yield of variousB, Ali H, et al. An outbreak of cutaneoustraditional laboratory investigations in theleishmaniasis in a village of District Dir,diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. J PakNWFP. J Postgrad Med Inst 2003;17:85-9.Assoc Derma 2004;14:59-63.

    12. B h u t t o A M , S o o m r o R A , N o n a k a S ,23. World Health Organization (WHO). TheHashiguchi Y. Detection of new endemic areas

    Leishmanias i s : repor t of WHO Exper tof cutaneous leishmaniasis in Pakistan: a 6-Committee. Geneva: WHO; 1984.year study. Int J Dermatol 2003;42:543-8.

    13. Noor SM, Hussain D. Cutaneous leishmaniasis 24. Bar i AU. C l in i ca l spec t rum of nasa lin Sadda, Kurram Agency, Pakistan. J Pak leishmaniasis in Muzaffarabad. J CollAssoc Derma 2004;14:114-7. Physicians Surg Pak 2009;19:146-9.

    Address for Correspondence:Dr. Muhammad IsmailENT SurgeonMarwat General HospitalLakki Marwat - Pakistan

    206PM I

    NASAL INVOLVEMENT IN CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS