NASA Project: Distributed Design Geri Gay, Professor Information Science & Communication Cornell...
-
Upload
alannah-norris -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of NASA Project: Distributed Design Geri Gay, Professor Information Science & Communication Cornell...
NASA Project: Distributed Design
Geri Gay, Professor Information Science & Communication
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Social Networks
• Comprise a set of people , organizations, and other social entities connected by socially meaningful relationships
• Study of communities in physical environments-can well-known concepts be transferred to virtual
Network analysis
• Group comprised of highly interconnected members
• In network analysis researchers measure the degree to which a group is a community
• Share important resources, provide social support, show reciprocity
Strength of ties
• Strong ties (family, close friends)
• Weak ties (share fewer resources and depend less on one another)
• Can you maintain close relationships online?
Social network analysis
• Focuses on relations between people rather than on individual characteristics
• Look for resources that are exchanged in creating and maintaining relations
• Multiplex ties (many relations) are more intimate, supportive.and durable
SameTime A/V Meeting Network, Fall 2002
Red – Cornell UniversityBlue – Syracuse University
Team Centrality
Wing TPS (16.83)
Chin Hot (16.33)
Wing Hot (12.17)
Hot Fuselage (10.17)
Active Cool (9.83)
Mean of info2_v degree
18
16
14
12
10
8
Average Team Centrality (t2).
AIDE Apprehension (t2).
Team Centrality
Wing TPS (16.83)
Chin Hot (16.33)
Wing Hot (12.17)
Hot Fuselage (10.17)
Active Cool (9.83)
Mean of s3 Team evaluation (s3b10-14).88
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
Assessment of Teamwork satisfaction (t3):•Honesty•Support•Conflict resolution
Team Centrality
Wing TPS (16.83)
Chin Hot (16.33)
Wing Hot (12.17)
Hot Fuselage (10.17)
Active Cool (9.83)
Mean of s1 DL expectation (s1b1-5).67
5.8
5.6
5.4
5.2
5.0
4.8
Expectations toward Distance Learning (t1).
• Using Social Network Analysis to inform decisions about group membership
• Identified teams with – Less initial apprehension toward new technology
– High expectations for DL
– High evaluations of intra-group communication
• Important dimensions for New task groups