NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
alan-cliff -
Category
Education
-
view
29 -
download
0
Transcript of NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016
![Page 1: NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100801/58e5205e1a28ab624e8b5bf1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Assessment in Higher EducationFollow-up to January 2016 NAPP workshop
![Page 2: NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100801/58e5205e1a28ab624e8b5bf1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Assessment grading� What I wish I had told students about how
I was going to grade / mark their work
� What I wish colleagues had told me about what I should tell students about how their work is going to be graded / marked
![Page 3: NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100801/58e5205e1a28ab624e8b5bf1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Rubrics/templates/schemes/memoranda/guidelines
For discussion:What is a rubric?
How did I ‘learn’ to mark/grade student work in my discipline?
How do I use rubrics in my assessment work?
![Page 4: NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100801/58e5205e1a28ab624e8b5bf1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Rubrics/templates/schemes/memoranda/guidelines
For discussion and reflection:
What are the advantages and limitations of using assessment rubrics?
![Page 5: NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100801/58e5205e1a28ab624e8b5bf1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Rubrics/templates/schemes/memoranda/guidelines� Advantages:
� Enable one to think about what one is trying to assess and at what level/s
� Allow for thinking about what is ‘measurable’ and how it might be measured
� Allow for standardisation of assessment� Create conditions under which assessment
can be replicated� Create framework for feedback to students
![Page 6: NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100801/58e5205e1a28ab624e8b5bf1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Rubrics/templates/schemes/memoranda/guidelines� Advantages (continued):
— Allow other academics access to the assessment
― A modified rubric can give students an insight into how to prepare for the assessment (caveat)
— Can enable an opportunity to evaluate the relative importance of a topic/theme/concept/aspect
— Allow external examiners a chance to verify the judgment
![Page 7: NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100801/58e5205e1a28ab624e8b5bf1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Rubrics/templates/schemes/memoranda/guidelines� Limitations
� May block creative/original responses not cued in the guideline
� Could ‘blind’ the assessor to an unexpected response
� May assume that learning is tangible/ ‘measurable’/visible – how does one measure the more intangible or abstract or complex?
� May trivialise the learning / create dogma
![Page 8: NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100801/58e5205e1a28ab624e8b5bf1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Rubrics/templates/schemes/memoranda/guidelines� Limitations (continued):
� May assume that an interpretive act of judgment is uniformly understood or amenable to other assessors – there is uniform/universal understanding of what a ‘good’ answer is; how a problem is solved; that what is tacit can be made explicit
� Potentially encourage students to ‘find the right answer’
![Page 9: NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100801/58e5205e1a28ab624e8b5bf1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Some useful resourcesAngelo, T. & Cross, P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: a Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Downing, S.M. & Haladyna, T.M. (Eds) (2006). Handbook of Test Development. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
![Page 10: NAPP workshop on assessment in higher education May 2016](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100801/58e5205e1a28ab624e8b5bf1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Some useful resourcesFreeman, R. & Lewis, R. (1998). Planning and Implementing Assessment. London: Kogan Page
Gibbs, G. (2010). Using Assessment to Support Student Learning. Leeds: Leeds Met Press
Nitko, A.J. (2001). Educational Assessment of Students. New Jersey: Merrill