NAGA_Doha_M1ISDD_Internship_Presentation
Transcript of NAGA_Doha_M1ISDD_Internship_Presentation
By Doha Naga Scientific Responsable: Dr Jean Christophe Gelly
Co-supervised by Yassine Ghouzam
13/06/2016
Study of stability of « Protein units »
using Molecular Dynamics
1
PROTEIN STRUCTURE
• Since Kendrew’s experiment
• Why studying protein structure? -Function
• How do Protein acquire architecture?
• how does a protein folds?
2
Proteins Domains Secondary structures
30 aas50 aas 5 aas... ...
CLASSICAL VIEW
PROTEIN ARCHITECTURE
3
Proteins Domains Secondary structures
30 aas50 aas 5 aas... ...
Protein Units
➡ Small motifs (Compact&Structured)
PROTEIN PEELING
Gelly J-C ; de Brevern, A. G. ; Hazout, S. (2006) BIOINFORMATICSGelly J-C ; de Brevern, A. G. ; Hazout, S. (2006) BIOINFORMATICS
NEW VISION
PROTEIN ARCHITECTURE
4
PROTEIN UNITS CORE
• Recurrence
• PU Cores,PU non cores
• At least 1 PU core in almost all proteins
• Significance ?
5
HYPOTHESIS
Protein units core are building blocks for proteins
Protein units core importance for folding
What are expected characteristics?
TENDENCY TO STABILITY
Assess by MD simulations6
PROTOCOL
• 27 PU’S (22 PU cores + 5 PU non cores)
• MD protocol (Charmm27 plus CMAP for proteins*,100 ns,300 K)
• Explicit solvent representation
• Temperature variation for some proteins(340K,398K)
• Analysis
*A.Mackerell(2004), JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, Vol. 25, No. 137
OVERVIEW OF PU TESTED
8
OVERVIEW OF PU TESTEDPU CORE
PU NON CORE
9
OVERVIEW OF PU TESTED
Stable UnstableNear-stable
PU CORE
PU NON CORE
10
OVERVIEW OF PU TESTED
Stable UnstableNear-stable
PU CORE
PU NON CORE
FOLDINGNUCLEI
11
OVERVIEW OF PU TESTED
Stable UnstableNear-stable
PU CORE
PU NON CORENEW MOTIF
FOLDINGNUCLEI
12
OVERVIEW OF PU TESTED
Stable UnstableNear-stable
PU CORE
PU NON CORENEW MOTIF
FOLDINGNUCLEI
13
NON CORE PU
0 ns• 2H8PA protein unit (residue 33 to 71)
14
NON CORE PU
0 ns 100 ns• 2H8PA protein unit (residue 33 to 71)
15
NON CORE PUFr
eque
ncy
of n
ative
con
tact
s
Time (ps)20000 40000 60000 80000 100000
• 2H8PA protein unit (residue 33 to 71)
• Loss of native contact( around 80 %) 1 out of 3 replicas16
NON CORE PU
• 2H8PA protein unit (residue 33 to 71)
• Loss of native contact( around 80 %), 1 out of 3 replicas
• C-alpha RMSD variation around 7 Ångstroms
Freq
uenc
y of
nat
ive c
onta
cts
Time (ps)20000 40000 60000 80000 100000
17
PROTEIN UNIT CORE: BAB
• Previous studies affirmed instability of BAB motif*
• Stable for 200 ns in our study
• Low of Variation of RMSD (1-2 Ångstroms) for each replica
18
*Coincon M. et al.(2005), PROTEINS 60(4): 740-745
0 ns
BAB
*Coincon M. et al.(2005), PROTEINS 60(4): 740-745
• Previous studies affirmed instability of BAB motif*
• Stable for 200 ns in our study
• Low of Variation of RMSD (1-2 Ångstroms) for each replica
• Native contact loss is less than 50 percent
19
Freq
uenc
y of
nat
ive c
onta
cts
Time (ps)20000 40000 60000 80000 100000
BAB
*Coincon M. et al.(2005), PROTEINS 60(4): 740-745
• Previous studies affirmed instability of BAB motif*
• Stable for 200 ns in our study
• Low of Variation of RMSD (1-2 Ångstroms) for each replica
• Native contact loss is less than 50 percent
• Reorientation of PhenylAlanine residue
200 ns
20
0 ns
NEW MOTIF
The Jaw motif21
NEW MOTIF
The Jaw motif22
NEW MOTIF
23The Jaw motif
NEW MOTIF
24The Jaw motif
NEW MOTIF
C-alpha RMSD scores
1.15 Å
0.86 Å
1.50 Å
25The Jaw motif
FOLDING NUCLEI
. *Lo pez-Herna ndez, E. and Serrano, L. (1996) Structure of the transition state for folding of the 129 aa protein CheY resembles that of a smaller protein, CI-2. Fold. Des. 1, 43–55.
• Chy Folding nuclei (residue 8-57)*
• 0.51 phi value inside structural root motif and 0.07 phi value outside structural root motif
CheY protein
26
FOLDING NUCLEI
. *Lo pez-Herna ndez, E. and Serrano, L. (1996) Structure of the transition state for folding of the 129 aa protein CheY resembles that of a smaller protein, CI-2. Fold. Des. 1, 43–55.
• Chy Folding nuclei (residue 8-57)*
• 0.51 phi value inside structural root motif and 0.07 phi value outside structural root motif
• 3FZVA protein unit (residue 79-135)
CheY protein
Chy Folding nuclei superimposed with 3FZVA Protein unit
27
FOLDING NUCLEI
. *Lo pez-Herna ndez, E. and Serrano, L. (1996) Structure of the transition state for folding of the 129 aa protein CheY resembles that of a smaller protein, CI-2. Fold. Des. 1, 43–55.
• Chy Folding nuclei (residue 8-57)*
• 0.51 phi value inside structural root motif and 0.07 phi value outside structural root motif
• 3FZVA protein unit (residue 79-135)
Chy Folding nuclei superimposed with 3FZVA Protein unit
28
CONCLUSION
Results are in agreement with our hypothesis
PU cores are more stable than PU non cores (statistically significant P-value: 0.001)
21 PU cores : 20 « stable » 1 unstable
5 PU non cores : 1 « stable » 5 unstable
29
Draw backs
• Longer simulations
• Simulation of Mutants
• Different protocols
• More replicas
• Different methods (REMD for example)
30
References• Coincon, M., A. Heitz, L. Chiche and P. Derreumaux (2005). "The betaalphabetaalphabeta
elementary supersecondary structure of the Rossmann fold from porcine lactate dehydrogenase exhibits characteristics of a molten globule." Proteins 60(4): 740-745.
• Efimov, A. V. (1996). "A structural tree for alpha-helical proteins containing alpha-alpha-corners and its application to protein classification." FEBS Lett 391(1-2): 167-170.
• Fersht, A. R. and S. Sato (2004). "Phi-value analysis and the nature of protein-folding transition states." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(21): 7976-7981.
• Garbuzynskiy, S. O. and M. S. Kondratova (2008). "Structural features of protein folding nuclei." FEBS Lett 582(5): 768-772.
• Kendrew, J. C., G. Bodo, H. M. Dintzis, R. G. Parrish, H. Wyckoff and D. C. Phillips (1958). "A three-dimensional model of the myoglobin molecule obtained by x-ray analysis." Nature 181(4610): 662-666.
• Lopez-Hernandez, E. and L. Serrano (1995). "Structure of the transition state for folding of the 129 aa protein CheY resembles that of a smaller protein, CI-2." Fold Des 1(1): 43-55.
• Sato, S., T. L. Religa, V. Daggett and A. R. Fersht (2004). "Testing protein-folding simulations by experiment: B domain of protein A." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(18): 6952-6956.
31
Thank you for your attention
32