N Cl C H3 EMImCl N C H3 -5-4 Urea Air2 Rechargeable Al/Air ...F656+Poster+2017.pdf · allow...

1
Rechargeable Al/Air battery with AlCl 3 -containing electrolyte N. Bogolowski, J.-F. Drillet | [email protected]| 1st September 2014 - 31st December 2017 Chemical Technology Motivation & Challenges Metal/air batteries such as Al/Air (8040 vs. 2046 AhL -1 for Li-ion) are potential candidates for sustainable energy storage applications High specific energy density possible due to gas diffusion electrode (GDE) Al is highly abundant and non-toxic Electrolyte should be active for oxygen reduction/evolution (ORR/OER) and aluminum deposition/dissolution and electrochemically stable allow triple-phase-boundary formation in GDE (contact angle > 110°C) be water-free to avoid aluminum passivation 1 Strategy & Electrode Reactions Use of ionic liquid (IL) or deep eutectic solvents (DES) for aluminum deposition/dissolution from water-free lewis-acidic AlCl 3 -containing electrolytes Assumed electrode reactions in EMImCl+AlCl 3 : Anode: Al + 7 AlCl 4 - → 4 Al 2 Cl 7 - + 3 e - Cathode: O 2 + EMIm + + 1 e - [EMIm-O 2 * ] [1-2] Overall: Al + 7 AlCl 4 - + 3 O 2 + 3 EMIm + 4 Al 2 Cl 7 - + 3 [EMIm-O 2 * ] Possible side-reactions: Cl 2 evolution during charging. AlCl 3 reacts to Al 2 O 3 with residual moisture 2 Half-cell tests: Al stripping & deposition on PG All studied electrolytes favor Al deposition/stripping EMImCl+AlCl 3 shows highest reversibility for Al- deposition/stripping on pyrolytic graphite In acetamide, redox peaks are asymmetric and high overpotentials for Al-stripping are visible Results Half-cell tests: ORR & OER at GDE Highest current densities with EMImCl+AlCl 3 However, onset potentials of ORR/OER are not well-defined: presumed values for ORR 1-1,5 V and for OER 1,75 2.2 V vs. Al Relative low ORR values are an indication for absence of triple-phase-boundary (TPB) Full-cell tests 15 stable charge/discharge cycles (3h each) possible at 100 μA cm -2 with cut-off voltages of 2.3V and 0.5V Average Faraday, 15cycles : acetamide 82%, urea 75% & EMImCl 56% Average Energy, 15cycles : acetamide 53%, urea 50% & EMImCl 39% 4 Conclusion & Outlook Feasibility of reversible Al/air battery with EMImCl, acetamide and urea + AlCl 3 (300 μAh cm -2 for 15 cycles in extremely dry air) was demonstrated Cells with cheap DES electrolytes (acetamide & urea) show higher current and energy efficiencies than those with expensive IL (EMImCl) Screening of further aprotic ILs or DES that favor TPB formation 5 Literature [1] C.J. Allen, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116 (2012) 207555 [2] C. Lu et al., J. Phys. Chem. C, 118 (2014) 3393 [3] H.M.A. Abood et al., Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 35233525 6 Cell set-up for electrochemical measurements Commercial ECC-Air cell Electrode area: 2.54 cm 2 ( 18 mm) GDE catalyst: Pt/C (1 mg Pt cm -2 ) Pyrolytic graphite (PG) for half-cell measurements 300 μl electrolyte 1.55 mm glass fiber separator Dried synthetic air (2 ml min -1 , 15 mbar overpressure) Experimental AlCl 3 -based electrolyte preparation Electrolytes were prepared by mixing 1-ethyl- 3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMImCl), urea or acetamide with AlCl 3 in a glovebox under water-free inert gas (H 2 O & O 2 < 0.1 ppm) Reactions: EMImCl + 2AlCl 3 [EMIm] + + Al 2 Cl 7 - RNH 2 + 3AlCl 3 → [AlCl 2 . RNH 2 ] + + Al 2 Cl 7 - [3] 3 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 -2 -1 0 1 2 PG || urea+AlCl 3 (1:1.6) || Pt/C i / mAcm -2 E / V vs. Al N 2 Air 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 i / mAcm -2 E /V vs. Al N 2 Air PG || acetamide+AlCl 3 (1:1.6) || Pt/C 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 PG || electrolyte+AlCl 3 || Pt/C i / mAcm -2 E / V vs. Al EMIm Acetamide Urea Acetamide + AlCl 3 (1:1.6) N + N CH 3 CH 3 Cl - O N H 2 NH 2 O C H 3 NH 2 EMImCl Urea Acetamide -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 i / mAcm -2 E /V vs. Al PG || EMImCl+AlCl 3 (1:1.5) || PG -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 i / mAcm -2 E /V vs. Al PG || acetamide+AlCl 3 (1:1.6) || PG -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 10 th cylcle EMImCl Acetamide Urea i / mAcm -2 E /V vs. Al PG || electrolyte+AlCl 3 || PG ECC-Air cell CVs at Pt/C with air or N 2 @ dE/dt = 10 mV s -1 CVs at PG @ dE/dt = 10 mV s -1 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 -5 0 5 10 15 20 PG || EMImCl+AlCl 3 (1:1.5) || Pt/C i / mAcm -2 E / V vs. Al N 2 Air -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 i / mAcm -2 E /V vs. Al PG || urea+AlCl 3 (1:1.6) || PG Cell voltages, capacities and efficiencies 0 10 20 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 PG || Urea+AlCl 3 (1:1.6) || Pt/C Faraday efficiency Energy efficiency PG || EMImCl+AlCl 3 (1:1.5) || Pt/C / % 0 10 20 30 PG || Acetamide+AlCl 3 (1:1.6) || Pt/C Cycle

Transcript of N Cl C H3 EMImCl N C H3 -5-4 Urea Air2 Rechargeable Al/Air ...F656+Poster+2017.pdf · allow...

Page 1: N Cl C H3 EMImCl N C H3 -5-4 Urea Air2 Rechargeable Al/Air ...F656+Poster+2017.pdf · allow triple-phase-boundary formation in GDE (contact angle > 110°C) be water-free to avoid

Rechargeable Al/Air battery with AlCl3-containing electrolyte N. Bogolowski, J.-F. Drillet | [email protected]| 1st September 2014 - 31st December 2017

Chemical Technology

Motivation & Challenges • Metal/air batteries such as Al/Air (8040 vs. 2046 AhL-1 for Li-ion) are

potential candidates for sustainable energy storage applications

• High specific energy density possible due to gas diffusion electrode (GDE)

• Al is highly abundant and non-toxic

• Electrolyte should

be active for oxygen reduction/evolution (ORR/OER) and aluminum deposition/dissolution and electrochemically stable

allow triple-phase-boundary formation in GDE (contact angle > 110°C)

be water-free to avoid aluminum passivation

1 Strategy & Electrode Reactions • Use of ionic liquid (IL) or deep eutectic solvents (DES) for aluminum

deposition/dissolution from water-free lewis-acidic AlCl3-containing electrolytes

• Assumed electrode reactions in EMImCl+AlCl3 :

Anode: Al + 7 AlCl4- → 4 Al2Cl7

- + 3 e-

Cathode: O2 + EMIm+ + 1 e- → [EMIm-O2*] [1-2]

Overall: Al + 7 AlCl4- + 3 O2 + 3 EMIm+ → 4 Al2Cl7

- + 3 [EMIm-O2*]

Possible side-reactions:

Cl2 evolution during charging. AlCl3 reacts to Al2O3 with residual moisture

2

Half-cell tests: Al stripping & deposition on PG

• All studied electrolytes favor Al deposition/stripping • EMImCl+AlCl3 shows highest reversibility for Al-

deposition/stripping on pyrolytic graphite • In acetamide, redox peaks are asymmetric and high

overpotentials for Al-stripping are visible

Results Half-cell tests: ORR & OER at GDE

• Highest current densities with EMImCl+AlCl3

• However, onset potentials of ORR/OER are not well-defined: presumed values for ORR 1-1,5 V and for OER 1,75 – 2.2 V vs. Al

• Relative low ORR values are an indication for absence of triple-phase-boundary (TPB)

Full-cell tests

• 15 stable charge/discharge cycles (3h each) possible at 100 µA cm-2 with cut-off voltages of 2.3V and 0.5V

• Average Faraday, 15cycles : acetamide 82%,

urea 75% & EMImCl 56%

• Average Energy, 15cycles : acetamide 53%, urea 50% & EMImCl 39%

4

Conclusion & Outlook • Feasibility of reversible Al/air battery with EMImCl, acetamide and urea +

AlCl3 (300 µAh cm-2 for 15 cycles in extremely dry air) was demonstrated

• Cells with cheap DES electrolytes (acetamide & urea) show higher current and energy efficiencies than those with expensive IL (EMImCl)

• Screening of further aprotic ILs or DES that favor TPB formation

5 Literature [1] C.J. Allen, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116 (2012) 207555

[2] C. Lu et al., J. Phys. Chem. C, 118 (2014) 3393

[3] H.M.A. Abood et al., Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 3523–3525

6

Cell set-up for electrochemical measurements

• Commercial ECC-Air cell

• Electrode area: 2.54 cm2 ( 18 mm)

• GDE catalyst: Pt/C (1 mgPt cm-2)

• Pyrolytic graphite (PG) for half-cell measurements

• 300 µl electrolyte

• 1.55 mm glass fiber separator

• Dried synthetic air (2 ml min-1, 15 mbar overpressure)

Experimental AlCl3-based electrolyte preparation • Electrolytes were prepared by mixing 1-ethyl-

3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMImCl), urea or acetamide with AlCl3 in a glovebox under water-free inert gas (H2O & O2 < 0.1 ppm)

• Reactions:

EMImCl + 2AlCl3 → [EMIm]+ + Al2Cl7-

RNH2 + 3AlCl3 → [AlCl2. RNH2]+ + Al2Cl7

- [3]

3

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5-2

-1

0

1

2

PG || urea+AlCl3 (1:1.6) || Pt/C

i /

mA

cm

-2

E / V vs. Al

N2

Air

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5-4

-2

0

2

4

6

i /

mA

cm

-2

E /V vs. Al

N2

Air

PG || acetamide+AlCl3 (1:1.6) || Pt/C

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25PG || electrolyte+AlCl

3 || Pt/C

i /

mA

cm

-2

E / V vs. Al

EMIm

Acetamide

Urea

Acetamide + AlCl3 (1:1.6)

N+

N

CH3

CH3

Cl-

O

NH2 NH2

O

CH3 NH2

EMImCl

Urea

Acetamide

-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

i /

mA

cm

-2

E /V vs. Al

PG || EMImCl+AlCl3 (1:1.5) || PG

-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

i /

mA

cm

-2

E /V vs. Al

PG || acetamide+AlCl3 (1:1.6) || PG

-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

10th cylcle

EMImCl

Acetamide

Urea

i /

mA

cm

-2

E /V vs. Al

PG || electrolyte+AlCl3 || PG

ECC-Air cell

CVs at Pt/C with air or N2 @ dE/dt = 10 mV s-1 CVs at PG @ dE/dt = 10 mV s-1

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

-5

0

5

10

15

20PG || EMImCl+AlCl

3 (1:1.5) || Pt/C

i /

mA

cm

-2

E / V vs. Al

N2

Air

-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

i /

mA

cm

-2

E /V vs. Al

PG || urea+AlCl3 (1:1.6) || PG

Cell voltages, capacities and efficiencies

0 10 20 300

20

40

60

80

100

0 10 20 30

PG || Urea+AlCl3 (1:1.6) || Pt/C

Faraday efficiency

Energy efficiency

PG || EMImCl+AlCl3 (1:1.5) || Pt/C

/

%

0 10 20 30

PG || Acetamide+AlCl3 (1:1.6) || Pt/C

Cycle