My Theories and Experiments a on Plasma

5
Postulates and experimental strategies on plasma (arc or field energy) I see plasma in two views, one is field energy (as a fluid) and other is like an arc of current connecting the electrodes. I believe the ent ire univer se is filled wit h energy/ field of energie s in varies forms and in varies densities. (The energy forms vary from fundamental particles to free radicals with mass to the high energy plasmas to clusters of energi es and massiv e stars). And it give s the probabi lity for the reg ions wit h zero energiy in space (in some special cases). Based on the above assumption/postulate, and by careful investigation of birth of black hole (as per existing theories), I postulate that the black hole is not a high density with zero volume mass, but it is energy void (absolute zero energy) surrounded by the cluster of high energy fundamental particles, which are building block of stable atom and molecules (including the free radicals). This is where, I can say in simple words that, the black hole is energy void surrounded by the plasma.  Misleads in the explanation of general observation about the back hole: It says that the black hole has very high gravity or gravitational pull/force that it attracts light into it. “Even light can’t escape from the gravitational pul l of black hole!But my explanation is: the core of black hole, which is a energy void, is surrounded by high energy fundamental particles and when light approaches it, the fundamental particles eats away the photon/light, in order to attain stability or stable states of mater (whic h is a na tural phenomenon that occurs in ato ms and molecules). That is why, the light doesn’t exert from the black hole, but not due to the gravitational pull. (If it due to gravitational pull, then hawking radiations also pulled to its core, otherwise they should have more velocity than light, which is contradiction to general theory o f relativity.) In conventional explanation of birth of black h ole, it is said that, the neutron star colla psed to its core and blas t away all the mass aroun d it and then form into high density and low volume body and even collapsed to infinity density with zero volume, which sense NO SENSE.

Transcript of My Theories and Experiments a on Plasma

7/28/2019 My Theories and Experiments a on Plasma

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-theories-and-experiments-a-on-plasma 1/5

Postulates and experimental strategies

on plasma (arc or field energy)

I see plasma in two views, one is field energy (as a fluid) and other is like an arc

of current connecting the electrodes.

I believe the entire universe is filled with energy/field of energies in varies

forms and in varies densities. (The energy forms vary from fundamental

particles to free radicals with mass to the high energy plasmas to clusters of 

energies and massive stars). And it gives the probability for the regions with

zero energiy in space (in some special cases).

Based on the above assumption/postulate, and by careful investigation of birth

of black hole (as per existing theories), I postulate that the black hole is not a

high density with zero volume mass, but it is energy void (absolute zero energy)

surrounded by the cluster of high energy fundamental particles, which are

building block of stable atom and molecules (including the free radicals). This

is where, I can say in simple words that, the black hole is energy void

surrounded by the plasma.

 Misleads in the explanation of general observation about the back hole: It says

that the black hole has very high gravity or gravitational pull/force that it

attracts light into it. “Even light can’t escape from the gravitational pull of black 

hole!”

But my explanation is: the core of black hole, which is a energy void, is

surrounded by high energy fundamental particles and when light approaches it,

the fundamental particles eats away the photon/light, in order to attain stability

or stable states of mater (which is a natural phenomenon that occurs in atomsand molecules). That is why, the light doesn’t exert from the black hole, but not

due to the gravitational pull. (If it due to gravitational pull, then hawking

radiations also pulled to its core, otherwise they should have more velocity than

light, which is contradiction to general theory of relativity.)

In conventional explanation of birth of black hole, it is said that, the neutron star

collapsed to its core and blast away all the mass around it and then form into

high density and low volume body and even collapsed to infinity density with

zero volume, which sense NO SENSE.

7/28/2019 My Theories and Experiments a on Plasma

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-theories-and-experiments-a-on-plasma 2/5

According to me, when the neutron star explodes, all the neutrons collapsed to

fundamental particles and then pushed away from the core, leaving core with

zero energy and particle spread around the void in spherical volume and

consume every bit of energy that comes in their way. And the particles try to

gain the stable state of matter and fill the void again with energy. And forms the

nebula and other energy field regions and eventually into a solid mass (celestial

bodies). Formation of black hole is not an end of a cycle of evaluation of a

star/celestial body.

7/28/2019 My Theories and Experiments a on Plasma

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-theories-and-experiments-a-on-plasma 3/5

Considering plasma as an electric arc connecter between

the high voltage electrodes:

Plasma is an electric arc, which is generated from the two high voltageelectrodes separated by a distance with non conductive fluid/material.

According to me, arc is generated due to the rhythmic vibrations of radicals/ions

in between electrodes. The electric field interaction between the electrodes

imposes vibrations in the free radicals and when vibrations reach to the

frequencies of visible light and ultraviolet the respective arcs are visible.

And if the electric arc produced in a vacuum then there must be something

which the field makes to vibrate or it should be the energy field vibrations, of 

the electrostatic field which is produced by the electrode. If it is the case then

the particle or mass is produced from the waves or in other words, the wave

energies are the fundamental entities of the particle. How the electric field

vibrates and produces the magnetic field and then form into the light or

electromagnetic radiation.

My postulate is: for Electric field and Magnetic field, to become a light, it

requires one more integrant thermal field, which is produces from the electricand magnetic field or it absorb from the surrounding (in chemical reactions

“cold flame”).

Experiment1: to measure the intensity of the light, which is produced in the cold

and hot environment and the energy required producing the arc.

Experiment2: to measure the intensity of light and the input variable of the

electricity with air and vacuum in between the electrodes and the setup with the

closed jars of air and vacuum around it, and all the setup in a vacuumcompartment and measure the effects.

Experiment3: gravity effects in the electrostatic field or in the electric plasma.

Measure the potential energy mgh of the non-conductive material which fall

from the height h. The experiment is carried in a chamber with air and then with

vacuum.

Experiment4: If there is ether in space or energy in vacuum, then measure the

voltage and frequency and other electrical inputs, which measure the electricresistance of the space in relative to air (though we have plank ’s impendence).

7/28/2019 My Theories and Experiments a on Plasma

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-theories-and-experiments-a-on-plasma 4/5

In general, air is an electrical resistant and when we apply enough high

voltages, the air broke its resistance and become electric conductive (may be by

forming into free radicals). Check it with the space; see the voltage required for

the space to break its resistance (other prospective). Did the space get ionized?

7/28/2019 My Theories and Experiments a on Plasma

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-theories-and-experiments-a-on-plasma 5/5

One can’t achieve the absolute zero: for two reasons:

In order to achieve the absolute zero the fundamental particles should

bring to rest (no vibrations) and the other is the system is too kept in absolute

zero surroundings; otherwise there will be instant transfer of thermal energy.

In production of liquid air, we decrease space between the molecules of the

air/gas, which means, we make to them to vibrate in low space. When the gas

brings near to absolute zero, they will become super liquids.

I think: in conventional vibrations the material/fluid tries to be together i.e., the

more attraction force between the molecules. Let it say, they vibrate in the

positive amplitude. And then in super liquids there will be more repulsive forces

between the molecules as they tries to absorb the energy from the surroundingsin order to achieve/gets into the stable state. This means, that the particles

vibrate in the negative amplitudes.

I postulates that, the particles in normal state possess the positive field energy

vibrations and in the super liquid state particles posses the negative field energy

vibrations.