MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1...

39
MVPA Opening a new window on the mind via fMRI Rebecca Saxe Summer Course 2015 1 Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see the video.

Transcript of MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1...

Page 1: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

MVPAOpening a new window on

the mind via fMRI

Rebecca Saxe Summer Course

20151

Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see the video.

Page 2: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

AccidentalIntentional

THINKING ABOUTHow much blame? THOUGHT

Dies  Fine  Dies  Fine 

© University of Illinois Press. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our CreativeCommons license. For more information, see https://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/.Source: Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) "An experimental study in apparent behavior."The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.

This image is in the public domain. Source: Photographs of the IMF 2007 Annual Meetings,International Monetary Fund Photograph by Stephen Jaffe. 2

Page 3: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

THEORY OF MINDThe False Belief Task

3

Page 4: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

THEORY OF MINDThe False Belief Task

4

Page 5: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

THINKING ABOUT THOUGHT%

Sig

nal c

hang

e

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Time (s)-4-20 2 4 6 8 12 16 20 24 28

PhysicalBelief

A volcano erupted on this Caribbean island three months ago. Barren lava

rock is all the remains. Satellite photos show the island as it was

before the eruption.

The photo shows the island as...

Group average

Anne made lasagna in the blue dish. After Anne left, Ian came home. He

threw out the lasagna and made spaghetti in the blue dish and replaced it back in the fridge.

Anne thinks the blue dish contains...

Individual participants

‐1 

‐0.5 

0.5 

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 

Considered thoughts

TPJ

beta

-val

ueR

% S

igna

l cha

nge

-0.3

0

0.3

0.6

Time (s) 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

Body Mental Physical

5

Page 6: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

THINKING ABOUT THOUGHT%

Sig

nal c

hang

e

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Time (s)-4-20 2 4 6 8 12 16 20 24 28

Individual participants

Considered thoughts

TPJ

beta

-val

ueR

% S

igna

l cha

nge

-0.3

0

0.3

0.6

Time (s) 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

Body Mental Physical

Dies  Fine  Dies  Fine 

TMS to RTPJ

Causal role

AccidentalIntentional

6

Page 7: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

THINKING ABOUT THOUGHTIndividual participants

y M

uch

None

...

V

er

Dies  Fine  Dies  Fine 

Causal roleTMS to RTPJ

Hypothesis:RTPJ selectively “involved in” ToM

% S

igna

l cha

nge

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Time (s)-4-20 2 4 6 8 12 16 20 24 28

AccidentalIntentional

7

Page 8: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

FMRI & COGNITIONBeyond “involvement”

Aver

age

BOLD

Activity shows: both stories describe thoughts Theory of Mind: Who thinks what? Why? (i.e. what reasons? what motivations?) With what consequences?

Stor

ies

Albert really wants this ski trip to be a success. Though

the ice looks quite thin at points, Albert thinks the

pond is sufficiently frozen over to support a person’s

weight. He tells his girlfriend to walk out on the ice.

During a trip Grace is irritated by her friend’s

constant whining. Grace sees a container labeled “toxic poison”, so she thinks the

powder is poison. She puts the powder in her friend’s

coffee.

Representations

* inspired by real stimuli

Population codes of features/ dimensions

Computations Transformation

8

Page 9: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Beyond “involvement”FMRI & COGNITION

Traditional analysis “MVPA” analysis

Univariate Multivariate avg magnitude across voxels relative magnitude across voxels

“Forward” / “Encoding” direction “Reverse” / “Decoding” direction Region scale Sub-region scale Stimulus “Type” Within type features

9

Page 10: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Koster-Hale et al (2013)

Your family is over for dinner. You wish to show off your culinary skills. For one of the dishes, adding peanuts will really bring out

the flavor.

You grind up some peanuts, add them to that dish, and serve everyone.

Your cousin, one of your dinner guests, is severely allergic to peanuts.

You had absolutely no idea about your cousin's peanut allergy when you added the

peanuts.

How much blame should you get?

VERSION #1Haxby style correlations

Experiment 1A Methods:

Minimal pair 4s; 2-4 words changed

You knew about your cousin's peanut allergy when you added the peanuts.

* real stimuli

cent

Sig

nal

Chan

gePe

r

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

0 4 8 12 16 20 24

KnowingUnknowing

10

Page 11: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Across

Across

Koster-Hale et al (2013)

You had absolutely no idea about your

cousin's allergy when you added the

peanuts.

You could see that your classmate was standing too close

but you kicked anyway.

Generalize across heterogenous items: (NB every item is unique)

Knowing Unknowing

The essay was typed, so you completely didn’t realize who

had written it.

Based on what the manager said, you

definitely realized the chute was faulty.

With

in

With

in

VERSION #1Haxby style correlations

With

in

With

in

oss

Acr oss

Acr

Even

Odd

11

Page 12: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Koster-Hale et al (2013)

You had absolutely no idea about your

cousin's allergy when you added the

peanuts.

You could see that your classmate was standing too close

but you kicked anyway.

Knowing Unknowing

Experiment a

AcrossWithin

Knowing vs Unknowing Harm

corre

latio

n (Z

-sco

re)

0

.5

1

1.5

Generalize across heterogenous items: (NB every item is unique)

(n=23)

The essay was typed, so you completely didn’t realize who

had written it.

Based on what the manager said, you

definitely realized the chute was faulty.

With

in

With

in

AcrossAcross

VERSION #1Haxby style correlations

12

Page 13: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Koster-Hale et al (2013)

You knew about your cousin's peanut

allergy when you added the peanuts.

Knowing Unknowing

Knowing vs Unknowing Harm

elat

ion

(Z-s

core

) co

rr 0

.5

1

1.5

(n=23)

Experiment b(n=16)

Experiment c

(n=14)Experiment 1A

LTPJ

elat

ion

(Z-s

core

) co

rr 0

.5

1

1.5

PC DMPFC(n=39) (n=39) (n=39)

Experiment a

AcrossWithin

You had absolutely no idea about your

cousin's allergy when you added the

peanuts.

VERSION #1Haxby style correlations

Same distinction, new implementation

The container is labeled “sugar”, so Grace believes that the white powder is

regular sugar.

The container is labeled “toxic”, so Grace believes that

the white powder is a toxic substance.

Experiment 1B&C

True Belief False Belief

*old data

13

Page 14: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Koster-Hale et al (2013)

You knew about your cousin's peanut

allergy when you added the peanuts.

Knowing Unknowing

corre

latio

n (Z

-sco

re)

0

.5

1

1.5

(n=23)

Experiment b(n=16)

Experiment c

(n=14)

n (Z

)RT

PJ P

atte

r

-0.8

-0.4

0

0.4

0.8

Intentional > Accidental (Z)

0 1 2

R² = 0.361

Experiment 1A

The container is labeled “sugar”, so Grace believes that the white powder is

regular sugar.

The container is labeled “toxic”, so Grace believes that

the white powder is a toxic substance.

Experiment 1B&C

Knowing vs Unknowing

Experiment a

AcrossWithin

You had absolutely no idea about your

cousin's allergy when you added the

peanuts.

VERSION #1Haxby style correlations

One measurement per individual

True Belief False Belief

14

Page 15: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

FMRI & COGNITIONBeyond “involvement”

Haxby-style correlations: - robust but simple measure - sensitive to minimal manipulation - generalises across heterogenous stimuli - stable in participant (relates to ID) - different across regions

15

Page 16: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Koster-Hale, Bedny, Saxe

Justbeforeheleaveshishouse,Quentinhearsamessagefromhismotheronhisphone.Themessagesaysthatshehas

badnewstotellhim.HeWesleyseeshimselfinamirr

Aftertheinterview,

seesstthaainthisdowshirtnthe

hafrsontabigcoff

or.

.ee

Whhis@iaenh

ncéestegetst

aondingwtherestaurant,Ericsees

Herfacelooksveryithherpa

happy.rents.

Whilecleaningoutherdormroom,Abigailhearsfootstepscomingdownthehallway.Thefootstepssoundlikeher

belovedboyfriend’s.

VERSION #1AA few more Haxby style correlations

Two orthogonal differences:

n=13; 24 stories/3 conditions, counterbalanced 16

Page 17: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Koster-Hale, Bedny, Saxe

Seeing vs Hearing

VERSION #1AA few more Haxby style correlations

ela

tion

ed

corr

Z-s

cor

Two orthogonal differences:

17

Page 18: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

hearsamessagefrJustbeforeheleaves

omhismotheronhishishouse,Quentin

phone.Themessagesabadnewstotellhim.

ysthatshehasHeWesleyseeshimselfinamirr

Aftertheinterview,

seesstthaainthisdowshirtnthe

hafrsontabigcoff

or.

.ee

Whhis@iaenh

ncéestegetst

aondingwtherestaurant,Ericsees

Herfacelooksveryithherpa

happy.rents. Abig

Whilecleaningoutherdormrailhearsfootstepscomingdo

oom,

hallway.Thefbelov

ootedbostepssoundly

ikeherwnthe

friend’s.

VERSION #1AA few more Haxby style correlations

Two orthogonal differences: Negative

PositiveKoster-Hale, Bedny, Saxe n=13; 24 stories/3 conditions, counterbalanced 18

Page 19: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Koster-Hale, Bedny, Saxe

Seeing vs Hearingela

tion

ed

corr

Z-s

cor

Good vs Bad

VERSION #1AA few more Haxby style correlations

Two orthogonal differences:

19

Page 20: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

FMRI & COGNITIONBeyond “involvement”

Haxby-style correlations: - robust but simple measure - sensitive to minimal manipulation - generalises across heterogenous stimuli - stable in participant (relates to ID) - different across regions - multiple orthogonal distinctions

BUT - binary, no info about ‘why’

20

Page 21: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

FMRI & COGNITIONBeyond “involvement”

More general idea: Response pattern -> Vector -> Point in voxel space

- Train classification - typically linear

- Independent test trials

21

Page 22: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

VERSION #2Classifying single trials

More general idea: Response pattern -> Vector -> Point in voxel space

- Train classification - typically linear

- Independent test trials

DV: classification accuracy

22

Page 23: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

VERSION #2

Bella poured the sleeping potion into Ardwin's soup and went into the next room, where her sister, Jen, was waiting.

They held their breaths while Ardwin started to eat.

Bella stared through the

secret peep hole and waited. In the bright light,

Bella saw his eyes close and his head droop.

Bella tried to peer through a crack in the door. In the very dim light, Bella

squinted to see his eyes close.

Bella grinned from ear to ear. "The potion worked!" she exclaimed.

Bella pressed her ear against the

door and waited. In the sudden

quiet, Bella heard the spoon drop

and a soft snore.

Clas

sifica

tion

Accu

racy

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Modality Quality

Classifying single trials

Not binary:

Modality Quality

23

Page 24: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

VERSION #2

Clas

sifica

tion

Accu

racy

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Modality Quality

Classifying single trials

Not binary Not redundant

Bella poured the sleeping potion into Ardwin's soup and went into the next room, where her sister, Jen, was waiting.

They held their breaths while Ardwin started to eat.

Bella stared through the

secret peep hole and waited. In the bright light,

Bella saw his eyes close and his head droop.

Bella tried to peer through a crack in the door. In the very dim light, Bella

squinted to see his eyes close.

Bella grinned from ear to ear. "The potion worked!" she exclaimed.

Bella pressed her ear against the

door and waited. In the sudden

quiet, Bella heard the spoon drop

and a soft snore.

Modality Quality

24

Page 25: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

VERSION #2

Clas

sifica

tion

Accu

racy

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Modality Quality

Classifying single trials

Not binary Not redundant

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Modality Quality

Clas

sifica

tion

Accu

racy

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Modality Quality

Distinct information across regions

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Modality Quality ValenceKoster-Hale et al submitted25

Page 26: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

VERSION #2

Clas

sifica

tion

Accu

racy

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Modality Quality Valence

Classifying single trials

Not binary Not redundant

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Modality Quality Valence

Clas

sifica

tion

Accu

racy

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Modality Quality Valence

Distinct information across regions

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Modality Quality ValenceKoster-Hale et al submitted26

Page 27: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

FMRI & COGNITIONBeyond “involvement”

Classification analyses - sensitive to minimal manipulation - generalises across heterogenous stimuli - different across regions - multiple orthogonal distinctions - item-specific, continuous (not binary)

BUT - tests hypotheses / features sequentially

27

Page 28: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

VERSION #3Representational (dis)similarity matrices

After an 18 hour flight, Alice arrived at her vacation destination to learn that her baggage (including necessary camping gear for her trip) hadn't made the flight. After waiting at the airport for 2 nights, Alice was informed that the airline had

lost her luggage altogether and wouldn't provide any compensation.

20 AFCJealous

Disappointed Devastated

Embarrassed Disgusted

Guilty Annoyed

Apprehensive Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic Content

Impressed Proud

Excited Hopeful Joyful

Grateful

200 unique stories, 80 positive and 120 negative

Sarah swore to her roommates that she would keep her new diet. Later, she was in the kitchen getting a glass of water, and took a bite of a cake she had bought for

their dinner party the following evening. Sarah’s roommates arrived home to find that she had eaten half the cake and broken her diet.

For the months before her marathon, Dianne trained even harder than usual, running extra miles and adding strenuous weight sessions at the gym. Dianne

hoped to shave at least 10 minutes off of her previous best of 3:14. On race day, she came in 23rd in her age group with a new personal record of 2:46.

Brenda was texting while driving. She went through a red light and hit a boy on a bike. She jumped out of the car to see if the boy was okay. He had a couple

scrapes, but, somehow, was otherwise okay. Brenda put away her phone and vowed to never text while driving again.

Skerry and Saxe in prep 28

Page 29: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

3. NDE confusion matrix and group neural confusion matrix??

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

i

nten

ded

emot

ion

judged emotion

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

Confusion Matrix (Behavioral) Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

DMPFC

ToM Network

A. B. MMPFC

RTPJ ToM Network

65%

Sig. Class

n=22 FWE p<.05, k>25

n=139

Whole brain searchlight

VERSION #3Representational (dis)similarity matrices

Skerry and Saxe in press 29

Page 30: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

3. NDE confusion matrix and group neural confusion matrix??

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

i

nten

ded

emot

ion

judged emotion

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

Confusion Matrix (Behavioral) Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

DMPFC

ToM Network

A. B. MMPFC

RTPJ ToM Network

65%

n=139

Whole brain searchlight

Sig. Class B>P

Overlap

n=22 FWE p<.05, k>25

Accu

racy

00.050.1

0.150.2

0.25

RTPJ MPFC LTPJ PC

** **

All

**

VERSION #3Representational (dis)similarity matrices

Skerry and Saxe in press 30

Page 31: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

3. NDE confusion matrix and group neural confusion matrix??

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

i

nten

ded

emot

ion

judged emotion

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

Confusion Matrix (Behavioral) Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

DMPFC

ToM Network

A. B. MMPFC

RTPJ ToM Network

VERSION #3Representational (dis)similarity matrices

Representation

Skerry and Saxe in press

After an 18 hour flight, Alice arrived at her vacation destination to learn that her baggage

(including necessary camping gear for her trip) hadn't made the flight. After waiting at the

airport for 2 nights, Alice was informed that the airline had lost her luggage altogether and

wouldn't provide any compensation.

Event features

Was this situation caused by a person or some other external force?

Was this situation caused by Alice herself? Does the situation refer to something in her past?

Was Alice interacting with people? Did this situation affect her relationships with

other people? …

31

Page 32: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

3. NDE confusion matrix and group neural confusion matrix??

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

i

nten

ded

emot

ion

judged emotion

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

Confusion Matrix (Behavioral) Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

DMPFC

ToM Network

A. B. MMPFC

RTPJ ToM Network

VERSION #3Representational (dis)similarity matrices

Skerry and Saxe in press

Agen

t Cau

seSe

lf Ca

use

Rela

tions

hip

38 appraisal features

Past

Inte

ract

ing

32

Page 33: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

3. NDE confusion matrix and group neural confusion matrix??

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

i

nten

ded

emot

ion

judged emotion

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

Confusion Matrix (Behavioral) Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

Jealous Disappointed

Devastated Embarrassed

Disgusted Guilty

Annoyed Apprehensive

Terrified Furious Lonely

Surprised Nostalgic

Content Impressed

Proud Excited Hopeful

Joyful Grateful

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

Gra

tefu

l Jo

yful

H

opef

ul

Exc

ited

Pro

ud

Impr

esse

d C

onte

nt

Nos

talg

ic

Sur

pris

ed

Lone

ly

Furio

us

Terri

fied

App

rehe

nsiv

e A

nnoy

ed

Gui

lty

Dis

gust

ed

Em

barra

ssed

D

isap

poin

ted

Jeal

ous

DMPFC

ToM Network

A. B. MMPFC

RTPJ ToM Network

VERSION #3Representational (dis)similarity matrices

Skerry and Saxe in press

Representational dissimilarity

Accu

racy

00.250.5

0.751

Observers Event Features

Classification of test stories

33

Page 34: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

VERSION #3Representational (dis)similarity matrices

Skerry and Saxe in press

Representational dissimilarity

Accu

racy

00.250.5

0.751

Observers Event Features

Classification of test stories

Kend

all’s

tau

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

Event F Valence Observers

Correlation to neural RDM

34

Page 35: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

FMRI & COGNITIONBeyond “involvement”

RDM analyses - parameter free fit - models of different complexity - sensitive to overall “structure” of representation - direct comparison of multiple hypotheses

BUT - less info about specific features

35

Page 36: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Beyond “involvement”FMRI & COGNITION

Traditional analysis “MVPA” analysis

Univariate Multivariate avg magnitude across voxels relative magnitude across voxels

“Forward” / “Encoding” direction “Reverse” / “Decoding” direction Region scale Sub-region scale Stimulus “Type” Within type features

Key problems:Null resultsTheory of concepts

36

Page 37: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Beyond “involvement”FMRI & COGNITION

Traditional analysis “MVPA” analysis

Univariate Multivariate avg magnitude across voxels relative magnitude across voxels

“Forward” / “Encoding” direction “Reverse” / “Decoding” direction Region scale Sub-region scale Stimulus “Type” Within type features

Future ApplicationsConceptual change in childrenCombine with dynamics

37

Page 38: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

Funding

THANKS

Packard Foundation John Merck Fellows Program Ellison Medical Foundation Simons Foundation ONR NSF CAREER NIH RO1 DARPA

Martinos Imaging Center Judith Medeiros-Adams and COUHES staff Participants and their families

38

Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see the video.

Page 39: MVPA: Opening a New Window on the Mind Via fMRI · 2021. 2. 17. · correlation (Z-score) 0 .5 1 1.5 ∗ (n=23) ∗ Experiment b (n=16) Experiment c ∗ (n=14) n (Z) RTPJ Patter-0.8-0.4

MIT OpenCourseWarehttps://ocw.mit.edu

Resource: Brains, Minds and Machines Summer CourseTomaso Poggio and Gabriel Kreiman

The following may not correspond to a p articular c ourse o n MIT OpenCourseWare, but has beenprovided by the author as an individual learning resource.

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: https://ocw.mit.edu/terms.