Muzaffarnagar - Need to Dismantle Institutional Riot Machinery
-
Upload
sukumar-muralidharan -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Muzaffarnagar - Need to Dismantle Institutional Riot Machinery
-
7/27/2019 Muzaffarnagar - Need to Dismantle Institutional Riot Machinery
1/3
Muzaffarnagar: The Need to Dismantle the Institutionalised Riot Machinery
September 21 2013
In the early years of the twentieth century, the British rajbegan loosening its steel
grip over the administration of Indian life. A limited degree of local participation in the
institutions of governance became then on, a commitment of the raj.
The zone of autonomy granted was narrow and constricted, but still afforded enough
space for a collision of sectarian demands, which often descended into violence. In
May 1903, a commentator in theAligarh Institute Gazette, the forum of choice for the
rising Muslim intelligentsia, spoke of a sense of frustration at the growing alienation
between the two main religious communities. We do not like it, we do not enjoy the
existing estrangement, he wrote: If local self-government has brought it about,
curse on local self-government.
This was the prehistory of communalism in modern India, when the putative leaders
of the two religious communities were competing over the space they could rightfully
claim in urban local bodies. As the space available for this competitive play of
sectarian loyalties expanded, to the provincial and then the national level, the
antagonisms sharpened.
If that was how matters were viewed then, sovereign and republican India, where
citizens are guaranteed equality before the law, should have a better way of
managing the clash of identities in public spaces. This is partly about confining
cultural identities to a sphere deemed private; partly about politics affording the
space for a civilised dialogue between faiths.
Yet, to judge by the recurrence of communal violence, politics in India has not been
a very effective forum for building consensus on matters involving cultural identities.
Indeed, in the absence of a solid civil society consensus, the competitive impulses
unleashed by electoral politics may well be the principal factor aggravating the clash
of identities.
A fortnight after simmering tensions in Muzaffarnagar district broke out in murderous
riots and a mass flight of the religious minority from several of its villages, versions
about what lit the first spark vary widely. Indeed, in the longer historical view, the
-
7/27/2019 Muzaffarnagar - Need to Dismantle Institutional Riot Machinery
2/3
narrative of the original cause may only be important for its indecisive outcome.
What is more relevant is simply that as political competition intensifies in the months
leading in to the 2014 general elections, local animosities are likely to be nurtured
and unleashed as a matter of strategy.
Political scientist Ashutosh Varshney points to a circumstance of some hope: places
that have a long history of civic engagement between communities in apolitical
bodies such as libraries, sports clubs and chambers of commerce are less prone to
outbreaks of violence. But can these civic bonds withstand the power of political
movements orchestrated from above, when the agencies of the state are themselves
sucked into vortex of fierce partisanship? From his own study of a long history of
communal riots, the political scientist Paul Brass thinks not. He arrives indeed, at the
conclusion that far from being spontaneous occurrences, riots are produced with
a specific agenda. This would typically involve calculated and deliberate actions by
key individuals, the conveying of messages, recruitment of participants, and other
specific types of activities, especially provocative ones that are part of a performative
repertoire. Parts of India with a history of communal violence, Brass has pointed
out, are unique in having an institutionalised system of riot production.
Can these institutionalised systems be contained and dismantled? Experience says
yes, though only with serious doses of political statesmanship and administrative will
one severely at a premium, the other likely to be under serious pressure as the
fierceness of political contestation mounts.
Successive electoral contests since the 1990s have cast the minorities in varying
political roles. In the days of Ayodhya, the main religious minority was stigmatised as
legatee to the various indignities inflicted in the past on Indias original, primordial
cultural identity. Later, it was portrayed as an impediment to the glittering promises of
modernity that lay ahead for India as it sought its merited place in global councils.
And terrorism, portrayed in the dominant political narrative as a virtual monopoly of
fundamentalist Islam, was the weapon deployed to thwart Indias march towards
global prestige and modernity.
Neither of these propaganda planks retains much potential for mobilisation in the
next round of general elections, when a variety of strategies will likely be deployed.In this regard, Muzaffarnagar offers crucial indications. Well before the incident of
-
7/27/2019 Muzaffarnagar - Need to Dismantle Institutional Riot Machinery
3/3
August 27 that is believed to have lit the spark for the conflagration that ten days
later engulfed the district, there had reportedly been a progressive embitterment of
the atmosphere.
Community honour, as represented in the dignity and bodily integrity of women, was
among the themes constantly played on to sharpen the growing estrangement. A
further twist was imparted by rumours made up in the Hindutva ideological factory of
a love jihad launched by attractive young Muslim boys equipped with the full range
of the tools of enticement modish clothes, mobile phones and sweet-talk to
entangle young girls of the other faith. In a region of the vanishing female, where
the sex ratio is believed to have fallen to near critical levels, this was an ideological
ploy of insidious power.
These ideological agendas are now wedded to the power of new modes of
communication, evident last year in the riots that engulfed Assams Bodoland areas
and the subsequent mass flight of people of north-eastern origin from some of Indias
most cosmopolitan cities. The official response then was to ban and block, showing
yet again a conspicuous lack of the political statesmanship and administrative will to
use these modes of communication for the good. Muzaffarnagar again spotlights that
dilemma: it is easy to press the best of modern technology to mischievous purposes,
far more difficult to combat its effects.