Mutual accountability: From Paris Declaration to Hanoi Core Statement Dar Es Saalam 11-2005.
-
Upload
taylor-schwartz -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
3
Transcript of Mutual accountability: From Paris Declaration to Hanoi Core Statement Dar Es Saalam 11-2005.
Mutual accountabilityMutual accountability: From : From Paris Declaration to Hanoi Core Paris Declaration to Hanoi Core
Statement Statement
Dar Es Saalam 11-2005Dar Es Saalam 11-2005
Vietnam: A big market with high Vietnam: A big market with high GDP growth rateGDP growth rate
• Population: 82 million
• Stable political system and social security
• GDP growth rate (1990 – 2005): > 7%
• GDP growth of 2005: 8.5%
FDI: Some figuresFDI: Some figures
• 1987 – 2004: 5 500 projects with 48.5 billion USD capital; 3 500 projects in production and business activities
• FDI = 20% of the total investment
• FDI = 14.5% GDP
• FDI = 50% exports
• FDI = 740 000 direct jobs
• FDI 2005: > 5 billion (previsions)
Vietnam: ODA recipeiptsVietnam: ODA recipeipts(1993 – 2004)(1993 – 2004)
• Engagements: 28.4 Billions USD• Disbursements: 14.8 Billions USD• Sectors invested: - Poverty reduction;
- Economic and social infrastructures (Transport, Telecommunication, power supply, Agriculture, Rural development, Health, Education, …)
Vietnam: ODA receiptsVietnam: ODA receipts(USD million)(USD million)
Receipts 2001 2002 2003
Net ODA 1450 1277 1769
Bilateral share 4.5% 3.6% 4.5%
Net ODA/GNI 4.5% 3.6% 4.5%
Vietnam: Top ten donorsVietnam: Top ten donors(2002-2003, USD million)(2002-2003, USD million)
Donors Gross ODA
1 Japan 452
2 WB (IDA) 414
3 ADB (AsDF) 224
4 France 96
5 Denmark 59
6 Germany 52
7 Australia 38
8 Netherlands 35
9 United Kingdom 31
10 United State 27
Constraints identifiedConstraints identified
• Lack of an long term plan for ODA mobilisation and utilisation;
• Lengthy decision making processes;
• Deficiency in the legal framework;
• Human capacity to execute ODA projects.
• …
Mutual accountability: why and Mutual accountability: why and when ?when ?
Concepts:• OECD: Mutual assessment of progress in
implementing agreed commitments of donors and recipient countries on aid effectiveness under 4 aspects: Ownership, Alignment, Harmonisation, Simplication
• Vietnam: In added: the division of responsibility based on riel context, conditions and capacities
Mutual accountability: why and Mutual accountability: why and when ?when ?
Why and When ?
• Needs on better and more effectiveness of ODA use
• Differences on policies, objective, mechanism, methodologies of identifications, planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluation
• Needs of change with volunteers: Opening, localisation and globalisation
Hanoi Core StatementHanoi Core Statement – The – The nationalisation of the Paris nationalisation of the Paris
DeclarationDeclaration
• Ownership:- Indicators:5 years Socio-Economic Development Plan (SEDP) is finalised and effectively implemented, CPRGS principals are integrated
- Targets to 2010:5 Year SEDP targets are achieved
Hanoi Core StatementHanoi Core Statement
• Alignment: Indicators and targets to 2010
+ Donors assistance strategies are aligned to the SEDP and related national, regional, provincial and sector strategies (all donors)
+ Strengthening of PMUs (all PMUs)
+ Strengthening of building programmes capacities (100%)
Hanoi Core StatementHanoi Core Statement
• Alignment: Indicators and targets to 2010+ Strengthening of Public procurement system (>50% of donors and >50% of aid flows)+ Strengthening of Public financial management system (>50% of aid flows and donors channeling)+ improve environmental and social safeguard (100% funded projects implemented to international standards and at least 30% using government systems
Hanoi Core StatementHanoi Core Statement
• Harmonisation and simplification: Indicators and targets to 2010:+ Fewer, better, core diagnostic and country analytical reviews (75%)+ Common project cycle management tools agreed and used throughout the project/programmes cycle (> 50% of donors)+ Coordination on policies and sector framework (75% of aid)+ Donor delegation authority to country offices (75% of interventions)
Hanoi Core StatementHanoi Core Statement
• Management for results : Indicators and targets to 2010
+ Results framework developed and used to assess the performance of SEDP and sector programmes (DAC criteria and continuous monitoring)
Hanoi Core StatementHanoi Core Statement
• Mutual accountability:
+ Periodic mutual assessment of progress
(Annual assessment)
ExperiencesExperiences
1- Division of responsibility• Donors:
+ UN institutions and Like Minded Donor Group : transaction cost+ Partnership Group on Aid Effectiveness: public finance management, trade reform, …+ WB and others: country assistance strategies+ 5 Banks Group: Project management, harmonisation of procedures, financial management, …+ Consultative Group for Vietnam (CG): forum for discussions on policies, strategies; evaluation of reform schedule and financing
ExperiencesExperiences
1- Division of responsibility• Vietnam Gov:
+ Building sustainable country system
+ Revision of ODA legal framework
+ Establishment of ODA master Plan (2006 – 2015)
+ Monitoring framework
+ Simplication of procedures: Procurement and financial systems
ExperiencesExperiences
2- Strengthening of Country procurement system
- Assistance of Like Minded Donor Group
+ Revision of relevant regulation
+ Promotion of transparency and fair competition
+ Information system (bulletin and website)
=> Final law document to be adopted by the National Assembly
ExperiencesExperiences
3- Strengthening the public financial management- Assistance of 5 Banks Group- Pilot exercise (4 sectors and 4 provinces)+ Strengthening medium term expenditure planning+ Streamline the country’s fiscal planning framework+ Modernisation of state budget management=> Final Decree document to adopt by the Government
ExperiencesExperiences
4- Developing a common results-based monitoring framework
- Assistance of UNDP and other donors
+ Design common indicators
+ 5 years Plan (2006 – 2010)
+ Software on evaluation and monitoring
=> The software on assistance projects on evaluation and monitoring transferred (9/2005)
Lessons learnedLessons learned
• Necessary of participation of stakeholders on every step of the reform
• Every stakeholders would benefit from the development of the country’s capacity and the Gov. system regardless of funding sources or aid modalities
• Donors and recipient country could look into real situation with concrete analysis before set down targets and performance indicators
Steps to continueSteps to continue
• Undertake a baseline study of donor operation procedures (cycle time, cost, schedule, …)
• Sharing opinions between Gov and donors on the 5 years Plan
• Action Plan on environmental and social safeguards (including projects/program preparation)
• Donors to continue to develop and implement joint activities
• Donors to outline their plan for decentralisation• …
Thank you for your attention !Thank you for your attention !