Multistate payroll compliance When, how and why it matters · Page 8 Multistate payroll tax...
Transcript of Multistate payroll compliance When, how and why it matters · Page 8 Multistate payroll tax...
Multistate payroll compliance
When, how and why it mattersApril 21, 2017
Page 2 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Disclaimer
► This material has been prepared for general informational purposes onlyand is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice.
► The views expressed by the presenters are not necessarily those of Ernst & Young LLP.
► This presentation is © 2017 Ernst & Young LLP. All Rights Reserved.
EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities.
EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms, of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com.
Ernst & Young LLP is a client-serving member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited operating in the US.
Page 3 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Today’s agenda
► Sourcing wages to the right state ► Onboarding ► Nonresident income tax considerations ► Key facts about income tax withholding
and reporting ► US foreign nonresident considerations► Latest developments► Payroll tax audits ► Audit flags, risk assessment and
remediation ► Benchmarking compliance
Page 4 Multistate payroll tax compliance
►Sourcing wages to the right state
Page 5 Multistate payroll tax compliance
State unemployment insurance sourcing rules (the four-prong test)
Employer ► Where wages are paid, and► There is a covered employee
Covered employee► Applies only in one state at a
time ► Temporary work incidental to
main job location is notconsidered
The SUI state is where the employee performs some work, and (in this order): ► Where the work is
localized; ► The employee’s
base of operations; or ► The employee’s place
of control. ► If none of the above:
► The employee’s residence
US Department of Labor, Program Letter 20-04
Page 6 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Unemployment insurance sourcing Example
Employer ► Headquarters office is New York► Employment and employees are
UI covered in all states
Employee ► Works across two states,
Texas and Louisiana ► Home office is in Texas ► General manager is in
New Mexico
The employee work state is (in this order): ► Where the work is
localized (N/A)► Employee’s base of
operations (Texas)► Employee’s place of
control (New Mexico)
If none of the above: ► Employee’s
residence
Since work is not localized in one state and Texas (rather than New York) is the base where the employee normally receives instructions, mail, etc., Texas is the SUI state.
Page 7 Multistate payroll tax compliance
State income tax sourcing basicsUnderstanding nexus for resident income tax withholding
► If a company conducts business or otherwise has a business connection to a location, nexus is generally triggered
► What constitutes nexus for income tax withholding purposes can vary by state and local law and can also vary for other business taxes (sales & use, franchise and corporate taxes); however, employee work presence in the state is one factor generally considered
► Courtesy income tax withholding ► Some employers withhold resident income tax
even in the absence of nexus► Keep in mind that special registration or
communications may be necessary to avoid incorrect assessments for unemployment insurance (where it is not applicable) as well as other business taxes
Page 8 Multistate payroll tax compliance
State income tax sourcing
Nonresident state► All services here are
subject to income tax withholding unless de minimisor other exemptions apply
► Keep in mind, nonresident employment can trigger nexus
Nexus exists if:► Employee works from
home office and such employment constitutesnexus under jurisdiction’s law
► Employer has permanent establishment or propertywithin the jurisdiction (e.g., office, plant or other assets as specified under state law)
► Employees perform services in the jurisdiction of the nature that constitutes nexusunder the jurisdiction’s law
Resident state ► Employee resident state is
determined based on length of timeemployee is present in the state
► Income tax withholding on wagesis required if employer has nexusin this state
Page 9 Multistate payroll tax compliance
►Onboarding considerations
Page 10 Multistate payroll tax compliance
US employee onboarding process
Yes
Common law or statutory employer ?
Federal Form W-4
State/ local Form W-4
Copy of US Social Security card (optional)
Form W-9 or foreign taxpayer equivalent
Common law or statutory employee
Independent contractor or statutory nonemployee
Worker is hired
►Employee legal name ►Resident address ►Social Security Number (SSN) ►Information for computing
income tax withholding
Form W-4, Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate
►Employee legal name ►Resident address ►Taxpayer Identification
Number (SSN, EIN or ITIN*)
Form W-9, Request for TaxpayerIdentification Number (TIN)
*ITIN is an Individual TaxpayerIdentification Number is issued to foreign persons unable to secure an SSN and isrequested using Form W-7
Read more about federal and state Forms W-4 here.
Page 11 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Which states and localities have payroll taxes?
Source: Tax Foundation
HI FL
AK
NJ
DC
DEWV
NC
SC
GA
IL OHIN
MIWI
KY
TN
ALMS
AR
LATX
OK
MOKS
IA
MN
ND
SD
NE
NMAZ
COUT
WY
MT
WA
ORID
NV
CAVA
MDMD
ME
RI
VTNH
MANY
CTPA
State and local income tax in one or more locations
No income tax withholding
WA
AKState income tax withholding
AK
Page 12 Multistate payroll tax compliance
When is a separate state Form W-4 required?
HI FL
ME
RI
VTNH
MANY
CTPANJ
DC
DEWV
NC
SC
GA
IL OHIN
MIWI
KY
TN
ALMS
AR
LATX
OK
MOKS
IA
MN
ND
SD
NE
NMAZ
COUT
WY
MT
WA
ORID
NV
CAVA
MDMD
Federal Form W-4 not allowed
No income tax withholding
WA
AKState income tax withholding
AK
Page 13 Multistate payroll tax compliance
States may have more than one certificate for income tax withholding
Type of form Purpose
Certificate of exemption Employee is claiming exempt from income tax withholding
Certificate of exemption (native Americans) Same as above for native Americans
Certificate of exemption (military spouse)
Employee is spouse of military person and is claiming exempt from state income tax under the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act
Certificate of nonresidenceEmployee is claiming exempt from nonresident income tax, usually under a reciprocal agreement
Page 14 Multistate payroll tax compliance
How do you know what state and local tax applies?Geocode software works like your cell phone’s GPS navigation system except that it also tracks the tax boundaries and tax rates that apply. Below is a free application made available for Pennsylvania local taxes at http://munstats.pa.gov/Public/FindLocalTax.aspx
Page 15 Multistate payroll tax compliance
State reciprocal agreementsAn exception to the nonresident income tax requirement
► Some states have entered into reciprocal agreements (usually with bordering states) where nonresident state income tax is not required ► Example: Under Indiana’s
reciprocal agreement, income tax withholding is not required for services performed in the state by residents of Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin if employees have properly completed and filed Indiana Form WH-47 with the employer
► Generally, the exemption from nonresident income tax under a reciprocal agreement doesn’t apply unless the employee files the required certificate with the employer (usually, a certificate of nonresidency)
District of Columbia
Montana
Illinois New Jersey
Indiana North Dakota
Iowa Ohio
Kentucky Pennsylvania
Maryland Virginia
Michigan West Virginia
Minnesota Wisconsin
States and District of Columbia with reciprocal agreements
Page 16 Multistate payroll tax compliance
►Nonresident income tax considerations
Page 17 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Multi-state resident income tax withholdingThere is no one-size fits all approach
Rat
her t
han
with
hold
on
all w
ages
pa
id to
the
resi
dent
, sta
tes
may
al
low
for o
ne o
f the
se e
xcep
tions
1 Reduce by amount of income taxwithheld in another state(e.g., Massachusetts)
2 Not required if nonresident incometax applies in nonresident state(e.g., Alabama)
3 Wages earned outside of the stateare specifically exempt from incometax withholding (e.g., Arizona)
4 Wisconsin excludes Minnesota nonresident wages from resident income tax withholding
Page 18 Multistate payroll tax compliance
State reciprocal agreementsAn exception to the nonresident income tax requirement
► Some states have entered into reciprocal agreements (usually with bordering states) where nonresident state income tax is not required ► Example: Under Indiana’s
reciprocal agreement, income tax withholding is not required for services performed in the state by residents of Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin if employees have properly completed and filed Indiana Form WH-47 with the employer
► Generally, the exemption from nonresident income tax under a reciprocal agreement doesn’t apply unless the employee files the required certificate with the employer (usually, a certificate of nonresidency)
District of Columbia
Montana
Illinois New Jersey
Indiana North Dakota
Iowa Ohio
Kentucky Pennsylvania
Maryland Virginia
Michigan West Virginia
Minnesota Wisconsin
States and District of Columbia with reciprocal agreements
Page 19 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Nonresident income tax withholdingApportionment rules vary by jurisdiction and earnings type
Regular pay. For example, apportionment may be based on wages/fringes paid in state x [days worked in state for the year ÷ total days in the year]
Performance pay. For example, apportionment may be based on 100% of commissions and bonuses earned within the state (without regard to days worked in the jurisdiction).
Trailing compensation. Nonresident income tax may apply to amounts earned for services provided in the state, regardless of when they are paid or where the employee resides or works at the time of payment (e.g., stock, nonqualified deferred compensation, lump sum paid leave, residuals for entertainers, etc.)
App
ortio
nmen
t rul
es
Sta
te a
nd lo
cal r
ules
may
var
y in
all
of th
ese
area
s
Page 20 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Trailing compensation Sourcing delayed wage payments to the jurisdiction earned
In 2016, employee is relocated to
Nevada and is paid bonus
In 2015, bonus is earned in New York
► In many US states and localities, lump sum payments such as accrued paid time off, severance, equity compensation and nonqualified deferred compensation must be sourced to the jurisdiction(s) where the compensation was earned for income tax withholding purposes
► For US state income tax purposes, an exception applies to qualified retirement and to top heavy plans (Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) or nonqualified deferred compensation) that are paid in substantially equal periodic payments over a period of not less than ten years (P.L. 104-95)
In 2015 and 2016, employee lives and
works in New Jersey and is paid
bonus in 2016
In 2015, employee
works part-time in New York and
earns bonus
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Page 21 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Federal-state protectionsOne exception to the nonresident income tax requirement
► At various times, federal legislation has been enacted to limit a state’s ability to impose income tax on out-of-state businesses and individuals. Following are some of these laws: ► Pension plans. In 1996, federal legislation under P.L. 104-95 was enacted
to prevent states from taxing certain pension income paid to individuals no longer a resident
► Interstate Income Act of 1959. P.L. 86-272 prohibits a state from imposing income tax pursuant to activities constituting solicitation of orders for sales of tangible personal property when orders are filled or shipped outside of the state
► Interstate transportation. Motor carriers (49 USC 14503(a); Rail carriers (49 USC 11502); Water carriers (49 USC 14503(b)(2); Air carriers (49 USC 40116(f)(2)
► Military Spouse Residency Relief Act. See more here.
Page 22 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Telecommuter considerationsThe home office could be a local business office
► If employees regularly work from home, the home office could be treated as a work location of the employer in many states (and localities)
► If the home office is deemed an employer work location, the business can be subject to income tax withholding, unemployment insurance and other businesses taxes
► In a New Jersey case, it was determined that a foreign corporation with a principal place of business in Maryland was subject to New Jersey’s corporate income tax requirements because one of its employees was allowed to work on a full-time basis from her New Jersey home office (Telebright Corporation v. Director, N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div., Dkt. No. A-5096-09T2, 03/02/2012)
Page 23 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Telecommuter considerationsNonresident income tax may apply in the headquarters’ state
Double taxation under “convenience of the employer” rule► Some states (e.g., New York) take the position that 100% of the
wages paid to a nonresident are subject to New York income tax if the employee is working out of state for the employee’s own convenience
► The rule applies when an employee receives direction and control from a New York location
► To argue that work location is for the employer’s convenience, there must be a direct business benefit in having the employee work outside of New York
► The rule can result in double taxation (e.g., tax in both the resident state and New York)
► The US Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge concerning the constitutionality of this law (Zelinsky v. Tax Appeals Tribunal)
► Double taxation under the“convenience of the employer” rule
Page 24 Multistate payroll tax compliance
►Key facts about income tax withholding and reporting
Page 25 Multistate payroll tax compliance
The top most misunderstood factsCommon withholding tax errors occur in these areas
1The New York 14-day rules don’t extend to employees’ personal income tax obligations.
2 Income tax exemptions under tax treaties and reciprocal agreements are not necessarily automatic.
3 Employers are responsible for knowing where their employees are working and the tax that applies.
4 Employee work at home may be considered a place of business for resident nexus purposes.
5 Employees working from home may owe tax in the corporate office state. .
6A federal tax treaty exemption does not necessarily apply to state and local taxes.
7 Income tax may continue to apply to trailing compensation even after the employee transfers to another state.
8 Computation of resident income tax varies when employees work outside of the state.
9 Federal law prohibits nonresident income tax for certain industries and payments.
10 Short-term work assignments are not necessarily disregarded for nonresident income tax purposes.
Page 26 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Nonresident income tax for short assignments Only 23 states have an exemption based on days or earnings
De minimisnonresident income tax exemption
HI FL
AK
ME
RI
VTNH
MANY
CTPANJ
DC
DEWV
NC
SC
GA
IL OHIN
MIWI
KY
TN
ALMS
AR
LATX
OK
MOKS
IA
MN
ND
SD
NE
NMAZ
COUT
WY
MT
WA
ORID
NV
CAVA
MDMD
WA
No income tax withholding
State income tax withholding
WA
AK
Page 27 Multistate payroll tax compliance
►US foreign nonresident considerations
Page 28 Multistate payroll tax compliance
The three traveler tax profiles to considerWhere you came from and where you are going matters
3US outbound
1US inbound and outer continental shelf (federal)
2Cross bordertraveler (state andlocal)
► Income tax treaties
► Totalizationagreements
► US visa status► Federal-only
jurisdictions in US off-shore waters
► Nexus ► Federal-state
tax preemption ► De minimis
threshold ► Reciprocal
agreements
► When do US federal, state and local taxes continue toapply whenUS residents go to anothercountry?
Con
side
r all
of th
e va
riabl
es
Page 29 Multistate payroll tax compliance
US Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)Offshore federal-only tax jurisdictions
Paci
fic O
CS
Alas
ka O
CS
Gulf of Mexico OCS
Atlantic OC
S
US Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)
Begins 3 to 9 nautical miles from state’s shore
Foreign employers and employees working in the OCS are generally subject to the same US federal withholding and employment tax obligations as foreign employees working inland except that US state and local taxes do not apply
► Social Security and Medicare tax apply to the employer and its OCS employees (totalization agreements may apply)
► Federal unemployment insurance (FUTA) tax applies without regard to employees’ eligibility for unemployment benefits
► In the absence of a treaty exemption, federal income tax withholding applies (IRS Industry Director Directive 2)
Nonresident alien employees that perform services on structures permanently or temporarily attached to the OCS, or on vessels or other devices engaged in activities related to the exploration for, or exploitation of, natural resources on the OCS, are generally engaged in a US trade or business.
Page 30 Multistate payroll tax compliance
US federal employment taxes Nonresident aliens in the US
1 Social Security and Medicare(FICA)
2 Federal Unemployment Insurance (FUTA)
► Applicable to wages connected with services performed within the US by most employees
► Special rules apply to flight crews and members of vessels
► Exclusion applies to employees holding these US Visas: F1, J1, M1, Q1, or Q2
► Employees who pay social tax in another country, may clam exclusion if there is a Totalization agreement between that country and the US (generally limited to 5 years). Employer must have certification of social coverage in the foreign country
► For 2017, employee pays 6.2% on wages up to $127,200, 1.45% on all wages, and 2.35% on wages over $200,000
► For 2017, employer pays 6.2% on each employee’s wages up to $127,200 and 1.45% on all wages
► Apples to all covered employers having employment within the US
► An employer (including a foreign employer) is covered if:
► During any calendar quarter in the calendar year, or during the preceding calendar year, paid wages of US$1,500 or more, or
► Employed at least one individual for some portion of each day for 20 days during the calendar year, each day being in a different calendar week.
► Exclusion applies to employees holding these US Visas: F1, J1, M1, Q1, or Q2
► For 2017, employer pays 6.0% on wages up to $7,000 per employee. A variable credit that reduces the rate may apply
Page 31 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Social Security totalization agreements
► Social security totalization agreements eliminate dual social tax when a worker is required to pay such tax on the same earnings in more than one country
► These agreements also fill gaps in benefit protection when workers have divided their careers between the US and another country
► The exemption under a totalization agreement applies for a limited period, generally, 5 years
► Employees must present a certificate of coverage from the foreign country to qualify for exemption from US Social Security and Medicare tax under the agreement
Click here for more information
Countries with Social Security totalization agreements with the US
Australia Germany Poland
Austria Greece Portugal
Belgium Hungary New in 2016 Slovak Republic
Canada Ireland South Korea
Chile Italy Spain
CzechRepublic
Japan Sweden
Denmark Luxembourg Switzerland
Finland Netherlands United Kingdom
France Norway
Page 32 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Federal Income tax withholding Nonresident aliens in the US*
1 Temporaryemployment exclusion?
2 US permanent establishment (PE)?
3 Treaty eligible?
► All wages earned in the US are subject to federal income tax withholding unless: ► The employee is present in the US
for a period of 90 days or less for the taxable year, and
► Compensation in the aggregate for the taxable year is $3,000 or less
► Services are provided for a foreign employer that has no US permanent establishment
► Example: Business visitorsattending a meeting in the US for the benefit of the foreign employer [IRC §861(a)(3)]
► While the US maintains treaties with a number of countries to prevent dual taxation, those treaties will generally stipulate that they do not apply if the employer has a permanent establishment (PE) in the US.
► PE generally exists under a treaty if: ► Number of days in the US for the tax
year is exceeded (e.g., for Canada treaty, 183 days)
► There is a fixed US location from where work is performed
► The nature of the employee’s activities in the US triggers a PE
► If the employer/employee qualify for a treaty exemption, federal income tax is not required if: ► The employee completes,
signs and gives the employer a Form 8233 with a US taxpayer identification number
► Wages exempt under the treaty are reported on Form 1042, 1042-S, 1042-T
► Nonresident alien is required to file Form 1040NR if US sourced income equals or exceeds one personal exemption ($4,000 in 2015)
* US resident (rather than nonresident) status applies to green card holders and those meeting the physical presence test
Page 33 Multistate payroll tax compliance
US income tax treaties
► Armenia► Australia► Austria► Azerbaijan► Bangladesh► Barbados► Belarus► Belgium► Bulgaria► Canada► China► Cyprus► Czech Republic► Denmark► Egypt► Estonia► Finland► France► Georgia► Germany
► Greece► Hungary► Iceland► India► Indonesia► Ireland► Israel► Italy► Jamaica► Japan► Kazakhstan► Korea► Kyrgyzstan► Latvia► Lithuania► Luxembourg► Malta► Mexico► Moldova► Morocco
► Netherlands► New Zealand► Norway► Pakistan► Philippines► Poland► Portugal► Romania► Russia► Slovak Republic► Slovenia► South Africa► Spain► Sri Lanka► Sweden► Switzerland► Tajikistan► Thailand► Trinidad► Tunisia
► Turkey► Turkmenistan► Ukraine► USSR► United Kingdom► Uzbekistan► Venezuela► Vietnam (Pending)
US income treaties are available here.
Page 34 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Canada resident in the US as nonresident Case study (coordination of federal and state rules)
A Canada widget distributor has one employee who travels to the US for tradeshows, annual client reviews and to pursue new business. Under the physical presence test, he is a US nonresident. There is no fixed US place of business. All sales are finalized in Canada but there is indication that key terms of US contracts may be negotiated while the Canada employee is in the US. Result: It is questionable if the company can take a positon under the US-Canada income tax treaty that there is no US permanent establishment (PE) since contracts are negotiated in US.
Work location Days Day Rate Annual FICA FUTA State incometax withholding
US 65 $485 $31,525 No (Totalization agreement)
Yes (Exceedsday and $ threshold)
Yes(Treaty is N/A due to US PE)
California(CA)*
12 $485 $5,820 N/A N/A Yes(Exceeds CA $ threshold)
New York(NY)*
16 $485 $7,760 N/A N/A Yes(Exceeds NY 14 day threshold)
Florida (FL) 37 $485 $17,945 N/A N/A No income tax
*California does not follow the federal tax treaty provision but New York does; however, the federal treaty in this case is not applicable because there is a US PE. If there were no US PE, there would be no NY income tax withholding.
Page 35 Multistate payroll tax compliance
US employee outbound considerations
► The worldwide wages paid by a US employer to US employees who are US citizens and US residents is generally subject to federal income tax withholding, Social Security/Medicare and federal unemployment insurance
► An exemption from federal income tax withholding applies:► Only if the employee completes, signs and
returns Form 673 to the employer, and then:► On the portion of wages exempt under IRC
§911 (foreign earned income and housing exclusions)
► For US citizens only (and not residents), on the portion of wages subject to income tax withholding in the foreign country [IRC Code §3401(a)(8)(A)(i)]
Page 36 Multistate payroll tax compliance
US nonresident alien employee tax onboarding (State income and unemployment tax rules vary)
Form I-9 indicates US nonresident alien status?
FIT/FITW
FICA
Yes
Form 8233 required for exempt wages
Form W-4 subject to special rules
Form 1042-S to report exempt wages
Show “NRA” on Form W-4, Line 6
Cannot claim exempt
Status is single and not > than 1 allowance *
Certificate of coverage required
Exempt from FICA
Show exempt wages on Form 941
Exempt from FICA and FUTA
Applies to F1, J1, M1, Q1, or Q2 visas
Show exempt wages on Form 940/941
Treaty exemption
Form W-4 special rules
Totalization agreement applies
Exempt under US visa
* This requirement does not apply to nonresidents of Canada, Mexico, South Korea or student business apprentices from India
Page 37 Multistate payroll tax compliance
►Latest developments
Page 38 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Mobile workforce income tax Recent developments to note
Connecticut (Act No. 15-1) Effective January 1, 2016, the compensation of Connecticut nonresident employees is exempt from state income tax and income tax withholding if employees are present in the state for 15 or fewer days in the calendar year.
Ohio (Sub. H.B. 5) Effective in 2016, the de minimis threshold for nonresident local income tax withholding is increased from 12 to 20 days. The provision applies only to employers that have offices or operations within Ohio.
Indiana (Public Law 243) Effective in 2017, the three local income tax rates (COIT, CAGIT, CEDIT) are consolidated into one, while increasing the tax that nonresidents pay.
Close call on New Jersey-Pennsylvania reciprocal agreement New Jersey Governor Christie sent notice to Pennsylvania that its reciprocal agreement with Pennsylvania would terminate after December 31, 2016. New Jersey lawmakers came forward with legislation to cure the deficit, reinstating the agreement.
Page 39 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Mobile workforce income tax Federal proposed legislation
Mobile Workforce State Income Tax Simplification Act of 2017 (Press release)► First introduced in 2009 ► Passed House in 2015, but not the Senate► Currently opposed by the Federation of Tax
Administrators and the National Governors Association
► Also opposed by states that benefit the most from nonresident income tax revenues
► Currently supported by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the American Payroll Association
► Notably, the proposed legislation would prohibit a state from imposing an income tax on nonresident individuals who work within the nonresident state for 30 or fewer days ► The bill does not address the tax treatment of
equity or other trailing compensation
Page 40 Multistate payroll tax compliance
►Payroll tax audits
Page 41 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Payroll tax recordsWhat is vital to a tax audit?
Compensation detail ► System taxability
configurations for earnings and deduction codes
► Annual accumulators for pay and deduction codes
► Plan documents ► Benefit enrollment data ► Employee vesting history
including work/resident locations
► Insurance contracts (health, life, disability)
► Wage/benefit apportionment calculations
► Gross to net detail by payroll period
Withholding tables and publications ► Tax tables or
computer formulas► Governmental
guidelines for withholding due dates, taxability, nonresident employment, etc.
Returns/information statements ► Forms W-2/Forms 1099-MISC ► Withholding tax returns ► Unemployment insurance returns► Proof of timely payment and filing
Employee resident location data ► Federal Form W-4 ► Human resources records (pay stub,
benefits notices)► Driver’s license where needed
Employee withholding allowance certificates ► All employee revisions► Forms required to claim exemption► Forms required for reciprocal agreements
Employee work location data ► Timesheets ► Expense reports ► GPS tracking data ► List of all office
locations and other job sites including address; magnetic swipe or security card system records
► Headcount reports by work location
► Board minutes ► Service contracts
1
2
6
5
34
Records must be available at minimum for the
applicable statute of limitations
Page 42 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Income tax withholding recordsThree important points to consider
Routinely download third-party service provider reports, records and returns Be certain that reports and records created by third-party service providers are downloaded routinely to your employer’s secure server. Keep a well-labeled inventory of the records you store and confirm each reporting period that the data is complete and has integrity.
Secure and store all necessary governmental publications Even if tax calculations are performed by a trusted third party, obtain from all taxing jurisdictions any publications or similar materials used to support tax calculations, returns filing, etc. In some cases these materials are updated, and tax records should contain all revisions for the statute of limitations.
Capture all necessary historical electronic data For instance, where employee self-service systems are used to gather employee withholding allowance information, capture all historical data used to calculate taxes for the payroll period. Similarly, historical information concerning employee work and resident locations is necessary.
Page 43 Multistate payroll tax compliance
New York withholding audit Audit defense life cycle
Risk assessment Field audit Settlement Post-audit
• Review company policy and procedures
• Identify information sources; confirm completeness of data
• Understand and document data anomalies
• Provide summary of findings
• Prepare responsive materials to the IDR, including preparation of electronic data files; gap mitigation; footnote exceptions; and document assessments that should not apply
• Participate in meetings with agency representatives
• Seek executive waivers• Review penalty assessment
accuracy• Discuss audit terms with
agency representatives • Review the final audit
assessment • Complete audit closing steps,
including preparation of amended employer returns
• Prepare and deliver employee communications and assist with tax return preparation
• Develop steps for, and assist with, ongoing monitoring
Information document request
12 to 18 months 6 to 12 weeks 6 to 12 weeks4 to 6 weeks
• Identify policy changes and revisions
• Review and document updates to procedures
• Prepare process statement for ongoing executive governance
• Perform a regular compliance review
• Conduct annual review of tax and reporting setups for earnings and deduction codes
Page 44 Multistate payroll tax compliance
MergersProvide a description of any mergers, acquisitions and/or sales of any affiliated entities.
1Work travelDescribe the system of tracking the travel of highly compensated employees based outside of New York.
2Work locationProvide any magnetic swipe or security card system records for New York locations.
3AllowancesDescribe the process for collecting withholding certificates from employees (e.g., Form W-4, the NYS Form IT-2104).
NonresidentsProvide a list of corporate apartments or houses located in New York.
54New York withholding auditSample information document request (IDR) items
Page 45 Multistate payroll tax compliance
New York withholding auditSelect audit samples
Nonresident review Telecommuters
► All employees with no nexus to New York state/city at the end of the year with federal wages greater than $20,000 and New York state wages greater than $0.
► All employees with a New York work state code or New York physical work location code but no New York state address (i.e., employees who work in New York but do not live in New York).
No reported wages
► All employees with no nexus to New York state, no New York state wages, and no New York state income tax withholding.
Telecommuters US outbound
► All employees with no nexus to New York state who have an indicator that they telecommute.
► All employees who typically are US citizens and who are working in another country per the employer’s records.
Resident income tax
► All employees with a New York state/city ZIP code, New York state address or New York resident state code and zero New York state/city income tax withholding.
Page 46 Multistate payroll tax compliance
New York withholding auditSelect audit samples (continued)
Worker classification NYC withholding
► All employees with a New York work state code, work location code, or address who received both a Form 1099-MISC and a FormW-2 in the same year.
► Employees with New York City withholding greater than zero, a New York City ZIP code and New York City withholding of less than 2% of taxable federal wages.
Incorrect withholding
► Employees with New York income tax withholding greater than zero and have a New York work state code, resident state code, physical work location code, or address and have little income tax withheld.
Worker classification Reconciliation
► All employees with a Social Security Number that matches a Social Security Number included in the New York state wage reporting database in at least one of the prior five years.
► Wages reported to New York per Forms W-2 does not agree to federal Form 940 or 941 (taking into account wages paid in other states).
No withholding
► All employees with a New York state/city ZIP code, New York state address or New York resident state code and zero New York state/city income tax withholding.
Page 47 Multistate payroll tax compliance
IRS international audit focus Two fronts now used in cross-border business visitor review
Employment Tax Group ► IRS focuses on payments from US, withholding, Section
911, and inclusion in Form W-2
► Question low or no withholding where wages reported in box 1
► Question no FICA withholding
► Look for Social Security certificates of coverage
► Review Social Security coverage
► Stock options and FITW, FICA
► IRS agents look for stock options to foreign persons and question whether FICA or FITW would apply
► Inbound short-term business visitor
► Some employers tell IRS that the business visitor is employed by the foreign entity and that the US entity is not the employer.
- Could backfire if IRS raises service Permanent Establishment (PE) issue for foreign employer
- IRS has indicated it will open audits of foreign entities sending workers to the US (we are not aware of any audits yet)
Foreign Payment Practice Unit
► IRS inquiries about inbound short-term business visitor
► Inquiries not focused on FICA, instead the IRS confirms FITW at 30%; Form 1042-S or Form W-2 reporting and use of graduated rates
► IRS focuses on payments from US, withholding, Section 911, inclusion in Form W-2
► Some comments have been made about referring cases to the Employment Tax Group for FICA analysis
Page 48 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Withholding tax audits are increasingIn the US and across the world
SEDE
US
MX
BR
ZA
NE
GB
FRES
LT RU
CNJP
IN
IDMY
PH
AU
NZ
CA
TRCH
IT
High risk Mediumhigh risk
Mediumrisk
Lowerrisk
Page 48 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Global traveler risk landscapeAudits are up in US and worldwide
The bottom lineTax authorities globally are focused on business travelers crossing borders
Substantial assessments, fines and penalties are coming out of audits
International business travelers are being stopped and questioned at immigration checkpoints
Employees are being turned back at borders impacting business continuity in those countries
If you don’t have a permanent establishment in the US, or a US bank account, how will you perform shadow payroll operations for the US?
Instances of tax and immigration non-compliance are front page news – can your company live with the reputational risk?
Consider how the new focus on US border security will further complicate compliance.
Page 49 Multistate payroll tax compliance
►Audit flags, risk assessment and mediation
Page 50 Multistate payroll tax compliance
The risk of noncomplianceMeasure the risk, not the chances of getting caught
Withholding tax liability
Penalties, interest
and criminal charges
Officer personal liability
Employee audits,
assessments and employee
morale
Loss of business license
Loss of reputation
Increasing consequences
Public companies must report any known contingent liability on their financial statements (FAS 5)
Page 51 Multistate payroll tax compliance
1 The state(s) where employees perform services is actively engaged in withholding tax audits.
2Vehicles or equipment that prominently display the company’s name and/or logo are frequently present in the jurisdiction.
3 Officers and highly paid employees frequently perform services in a particular state, and/or their presence in the state is easily documented or otherwise well-known. For example, public records reflect an upcoming acquisition, purchase or stockholder meeting.
4 Sales and use taxes are paid to the state but not income tax withholding.
5 Wages are reported on Form W-2 to the state, but no local wages are reported.
6 Expense reports show reimbursement for travel to other states and localities.
7 Accounts payable records show travel, relocation or other “out-of-state” related costs paid on behalf of employees.
8 A parent operates a subsidiary in one or more states other than the state of the parent company.
9 The company holds a corporate lease or otherwise owns property in the jurisdiction for use by its employees.
10 Employees own or lease residential property, hold driver’s licenses or are registered to vote in a state other than the resident state shown on the Form W-2 or Form W-4.
11 Unemployment insurance is paid to the state but not income tax withholding.
12 Wage and tax adjustments were filed with one taxing jurisdiction and not another. Keep in mind that the IRS has an agreement with a number of states to share tax audit findings.
13 Accounting records reflect a tax reserve for contingent liabilities connected with underreported wages and related income taxes.
14 The company is under contract with the state or municipality to provide goods or services.
15 Independent contractors are substantially used in a state, irrespective of whether the company is deemed to be doing business in that jurisdiction.
Top15 income tax withholding audit flags
Income tax withholding audit flagsWhat tax auditors may watch for
Page 60 US cross border considerations: Focus on multistate income tax
The accurate tracking and reporting ofbusiness travelers’ wages and taxesposes many challenges foremployers, including:► Accumulating accurate travel data► Making sure it is current – accurate
data that is too old is dangerous ifa threshold has already beenexceeded
► Maintaining up-to-date knowledgeof all relevant jurisdictions,particularly newly visited orinfrequently visited locations
► Understanding the differencebetween the letter of the law andestablishing practice in somelocations
► Managing the data such that risksand consequences ofnoncompliance are minimized
Usually an organization owned process
Inputs from travel suppliers,building security, electronic diaries
STBTs
1Data capture
2Trackingdata
Storing,maintainingandupdating data
Calendaringtools
3Analysis - Applyingrelevant technical rules
4Flag andcomplianceaction
Triggerand paywithholdingtaxes
Year-endreporting
Tax returnpreparationand filing
Certificatesof coverageand treatyexemptionforms
Social security ImmigrationTax
In-house expertise oroutsourced to service providerin part or whole.
Easilydeployable ITkey to success
Short-term business travelersData gathering and processing considerations
Page 61 US cross border considerations: Focus on multistate income tax
Some company policy considerations
Governanceroles and steps
WorkdayDefinition
Coveredemployees
Compliantstates and
locales
Locationtracking
method(s)
Tax equalization(gross up)
Immigration
Travel expensereimbursement
Telecommuters
Trailingcompensation
Employee taxreturn
preparation
Withholdingand true upfrequency
Who owns thisprocess?
Page 52 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Payroll withholding audits Risk assessment and mitigation steps
Prioritize► Monetary risk► Reputational risk
Identify► Work and resident
locations
Mitigate► Amnesty program► Voluntary disclosure
Research► Requirements► Sanctions
1
2
3
4Comply
Page 53 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Remediation considerations Prioritizing jurisdictions and their timing
Factors to consider when prioritizing remediation► Amnesty or voluntary disclosure
opportunities► Business risk within a jurisdiction► Audit risk and potential criminal, civil or
administrative penalties► Potential for reputational risk► Extent of revenue authority information
sharing► Relationships with the jurisdiction
(government contracts, etc.) ► Statute of limitations, including where
returns have not been filed (and, consequently, the statute won’t expire)
Page 54 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Remediation considerations Resolving compliance issues with taxing authorities
Remediation strategy► Settle at the corporate (rather than
employee) level► Make one off payments to revenue
authorities► Minimize penalties and interest charges► Consider reasonable cause where
applicable ► Conduct self audits ► Gather historical jurisdictional data such
as tax and interest rates
Page 55 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Are you on board?
Are you perpetually tracking employee movement and meeting the related wage tax liabilities across national, state and local borders?
If your mobility workforce tax processes are not optimal, have you quantified the risks?
For employees routinely living and working in different jurisdictions, do you have a system for apportioning wages and timely withholding taxes?
Is your mobile workforce tax policy adequately addressing your compliance and governance requirements?
Are employees familiar with your mobile workforce tax policy and do you provide them with resources to address their questions and concerns?
When employees receive compensation for services provided in prior years, do you consider states/cities of employment during the period earned?
Who are your business partners? How are they integrated? Are you performing an end-to-end review?
Page 56 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Take a one-minute risk assessment O
verall compliance
1 – High risk2 – Medium high risk3 – Medium risk4 – Low or no risk
Rank your performance overall and in each of these five phases of mobile workforce income tax compliance
Page 57 Multistate payroll tax compliance
►Benchmarking compliance
Page 58 Multistate payroll tax compliance
2015 Ernst & Young LLP and Bloomberg BNA Multistate Payroll Compliance Survey
Risk More than 500 respondents identified areas of risk.
Trailing compensation Many respondents have challenges sourcing equity compensation and similar earnings to the correct states.
Audits are on the rise Many respondents have been subject to governmental withholding tax audits.
Other trends and factsResults tell us other trends about company policies and resources relied on for compliance.
Work location tracking Many respondents say they rely on employees to self report their work locations.
Compliance Most respondents indicated they do not comply with all requirements.
Six key findings
Page 59 Multistate payroll tax compliance
2015 Multistate Payroll Compliance SurveyTune in to our June webcast for 2016 findings
The report contains 48 pages of polling results and analysis to assist you in benchmarking your policies and procedures with other employers of your size and industry.
Click on the report covers to download.
Download your copy of the 2015 Multistate Payroll Tax Compliance Report
Tune in to our June webcast for the 2016survey results
► Leave your business card to be included our webcast invitation list
► Earn 1.5 RCH credits by participating in the webcast
► At the close of the webcast, participate in the 2017 survey and of the first to see the complete report
Page 61 Multistate payroll tax compliance
Ernst & Young LLP
Putting informintoInformation
Stay connected Like our payroll year-end page on Facebook Tour the EY payroll year-end checklist Learn about multistate payroll tax at EY get on board Follow EY on Twitter @EYEmploymentTaxVisit EY on LinkedIn @Payroll Perspectives from EY