MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism -...

247
INTER-AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE CONTROL COMMISSION (CICAD) M M U U L L T T I I L L A A T T E E R R A A L L E E V V A A L L U U A A T T I I O O N N M M E E C C H H A A N N I I S S M M M M E E M M Q Q u u e e s s t t i i o o n n n n a a i i r r e e T T h h i i r r d d E E v v a a l l u u a a t t i i o o n n R R o o u u n n d d

Transcript of MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism -...

Page 1: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

IINNTTEERR--AAMMEERRIICCAANN DDRRUUGG AABBUUSSEE CCOONNTTRROOLL

CCOOMMMMIISSSSIIOONN ((CCIICCAADD))

MMUULLTTIILLAATTEERRAALL

EEVVAALLUUAATTIIOONN MMEECCHHAANNIISSMM MM

EE MM

QQuueessttiioonnnnaaiirree TThhiirrdd EEvvaalluuaattiioonn RRoouunndd

Page 2: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please
Page 3: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

IINNDDEEXX OOFF IINNDDIICCAATTOORRSS

Page

i

SECTION I : OPTIMIZATION OF NATIONAL ANTI-DRUG STRATEGY INSTITUTION BUILDING Indicator 1 - Implementation of a national anti-drug plan/strategy.................................................................. 1 Indicator 2 - Financing the National Anti-Drug Strategy/Plan ......................................................................... 5 Indicator 3 - Attributes of the National Drug Authority ................................................................................... 9 Indicator 4 - Budget for the National Drug Authority .................................................................................... 13 TREATIES Indicator 5 - Ratified international conventions............................................................................................. 17 INFORMATION Indicator 6 - Data collection capacity ............................................................................................................ 21 Indicator 7 - Information distribution capacity ............................................................................................... 27

SECTION II : DEMAND REDUCTION DEMAND REDUCTION Indicator 8 - Implementation of a national system of drug abuse prevention programs that

target key populations............................................................................................................... 31 Indicator 9 - Existence of professional specialized training in drug abuse prevention,

treatment and research ............................................................................................................ 35 Indicator 10 - Evaluation of Prevention Programs .......................................................................................... 39 Indicator 11 - Research of the Impact of prevention programs ...................................................................... 41 Indicator 12 - Existence and application of guidelines or regulations on standards of care for

drug abuse treatment................................................................................................................ 43 Indicator 13 - Characteristics of drug treatment and rehabilitation programs that include

early intervention (detection), treatment, rehabilitation, social reintegration and aftercare.................................................................................................................................... 47

Indicator 14 - Demand for treatment............................................................................................................... 51 Indicator 15 - Results of studies to evaluate various treatment and rehabilitation programs

and modalities in order to assess their effectiveness............................................................... 53 Indicator 16 - Prevalence of Drug Abuse........................................................................................................ 55 Indicator 17 - Average age of first use of any drug......................................................................................... 61 Indicator 18 - Percentage of youth aged 10-19 that perceive drug use as harmful to health

and well-being........................................................................................................................... 63 Indicator 19 - Drug-related morbidity .............................................................................................................. 65 Indicator 20 - New trends in drug abuse......................................................................................................... 69 Indicator 21 - Drug-related mortality ............................................................................................................... 71 Indicator 22 - Drug use and related accidents and crime ............................................................................... 75

Page 4: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

IINNDDEEXX OOFF IINNDDIICCAATTOORRSS

Page

ii

SECTION III : SUPPLY REDUCTION DRUG PRODUCTION AND ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT Indicator 23 - Area cultivated and potential production of raw materials and drugs, by type of

plant .......................................................................................................................................... 79 Indicator 24 - Number of indoor-grown plants seized, and their potential to produce raw

material ..................................................................................................................................... 83 Indicator 25 - Areas no longer used for illicit crops (by type of plant) as a result of

eradication or abandonment ..................................................................................................... 85 Indicator 26 - Variation of illicit crops, by type of plant and by year................................................................ 87 Indicator 27 - Existence of alternative development programs (by type)........................................................ 89 Indicator 28 - Impact of alternative development programs ........................................................................... 91 DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES Indicator 29 - Illicit laboratories of organic drugs destroyed and potential production by year ...................... 93 Indicator 30 - Illicit laboratories of synthetic drugs destroyed and potential production by

year ........................................................................................................................................... 95 Indicator 31 - Operational scope of activities of national entity or entities responsible for

controlling pharmaceutical products and preventing their diversion......................................... 99 Indicator 32 - Operational scope of activities of national entity or entities responsible for

regulating controlled chemical substances and preventing their diversion ............................ 105 Indicator 33 - Regulation of the use and distribution of pharmaceutical products by health

professionals........................................................................................................................... 109 Indicator 34 - National laws and/or regulations for penal, civil and administrative sanctions

against the diversion of controlled chemical substances........................................................ 113 Indicator 35 - National laws and/or regulations for penal, civil and administrative sanctions

against the diversion of pharmaceutical products ................................................................. 115 Indicator 36 - Number of pre-export (re-exportation) notifications for controlled chemical

substances, by year, sent by the Competent Authority of the exporting or transit country ......................................................................................................................... 117

Indicator 37 - Pre-export notifications for controlled chemical substances replied to on time by your country relative to the number of pre-export notifications received, by year ......................................................................................................................................... 121

Indicator 38 - Pharmaceutical products seized, by number and quantities, and disposed of by substance, quantity and by year ........................................................................................ 125

Indicator 39 - Controlled chemical substances seized, by number and quantities, and disposed of by substance, by quantity and by year................................................................ 129

SECTION IV : CONTROL MEASURES ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING Indicator 40 - Number of drug seizures by law enforcement agencies and quantities of

drugs seized by substance, by measure and by year ............................................................ 133 Indicator 41 - Number of persons arrested, tried and convicted for illicit drug trafficking............................. 137 Indicator 42 - Number of persons charged and convicted for illicit drug trafficking ..................................... 139 Indicator 43 - Number of persons arrested, tried and convicted for illicit possession of drugs ................... 141 Indicator 44 - Number of persons charged and convicted for illicit possession of drugs.............................. 145 Indicator 45 - Operational information exchange and collaboration among national

authorities with responsibilities for controlling illicit drug trafficking........................................ 149 Indicator 46 - Judicial cooperation to investigate and convict drug traffickers ............................................. 151

Page 5: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

IINNDDEEXX OOFF IINNDDIICCAATTOORRSS

Page

iii

Indicator 47 - Number of extradition requests for illicit drug trafficking made by your country to other States and the number of replies received, in accordance with international agreements ........................................................................................................ 153

Indicator 48 - Number of extradition requests received for illicit drug trafficking, in accordance with international agreements ............................................................................. 157

CORRUPTION Indicator 49 - Criminalization of acts of corruption........................................................................................ 161 Indicator 50 - Number of public officials arrested /charged/ tried and convicted for offenses

related to illicit drug trafficking ................................................................................................ 165 FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS Indicator 51 - Operational scope of activities of national entities responsible for controlling

movement of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials and preventing their diversion................................................................................................. 167

Indicator 52 - Scope of national laws and/or regulations that criminalize the illicit possession, trafficking and manufacture of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials ..................................................................................................... 171

Indicator 53 - Number of persons arrested/charged/ tried and convicted for illicit possession and trafficking of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials.................... 173

Indicator 54 - Scope of laws and/or regulations that establish administrative controls to prevent the diversion of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials ................................................................................................................................. 177

Indicator 55 - For the country of import or in-transit, operation of national laws and/or regulations that require, before authorizing the entry of shipments of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials into your country, that the necessary import or in-transit licenses or authorizations have first been issued ................... 181

Indicator 56 - For the country of export, operation of national laws and/or regulations that require, before issuing the export license or authorization, that the importing country has first issued the necessary licenses or authorizations.......................................... 183

Indicator 57 - For the country of export, operation of national laws and/or regulations that require, before authorizing the export of shipments of firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials, that the in-transit countries have issued the necessary licenses or authorizations(1)................................................................ 185

Indicator 58 - Quantity of illicitly trafficked firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials confiscated .................................................................................................. 187

Indicator 59 - Organization of a national database or record keeping system that maintains a record by dates, description and serial or lot numbers of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials imported, exported or moving in-transit...................................................................................................................... 191

Indicator 60 - Operational scope of activities of entities responsible for information exchange and collaboration between countries, in relation to the control of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials. .............................................. 193

Indicator 61 - Number of requests made to other states to obtain information in relation to shipments of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials and replies received, taking into account international agreements....................................... 197

Indicator 62 - Number of requests received to obtain information in relation to shipments of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials taking into account international agreements........................................................................................... 201

MONEY LAUNDERING Indicator 63 - Scope of national laws that criminalize money laundering..................................................... 205 Indicator 64 - Scope of national laws that authorize special investigations on money

laundering ............................................................................................................................... 209

Page 6: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

IINNDDEEXX OOFF IINNDDIICCAATTOORRSS

Page

iv

Indicator 65 - Scope of national laws that establish administrative controls to prevent money laundering ............................................................................................................................... 211

Indicator 66 - Number of persons arrested/charged/ tried and convicted for money laundering ............................................................................................................................... 213

Indicator 67 - Scope of national laws and regulations requiring financial institutions and others responsible to report suspicious or unusual transactions to the competent authorities and to comply with other control measures ........................................ 215

Indicator 68 - Number of suspicious transactions reports and their outcome .............................................. 219 Indicator 69 - Number of sanctions imposed on financial institutions and others responsible

for failure to report suspicious transactions or to comply with other money laundering control measures .................................................................................................. 223

Indicator 70 - Option of lifting bank secrecy (1) ........................................................................................... 225 Indicator 71 - Value of property forfeited in cases related to money laundering .......................................... 227 Indicator 72 - Operation of an entity for the management and/or disposition of assets seized

and forfeited from illicit drug trafficking and money laundering .............................................. 229 Indicator 73 - Existence and operation of a Financial Intelligence/Analysis/Investigation Unit

that receives, requests, analyzes and reports to the competent authorities information on transactions that may constitute money laundering ....................................... 231

Indicator 74 - Implementation and operating level of the Financial Intelligence/Analysis/Investigation Unit that receives, requests, analyzes and reports to the competent authorities information on transactions that may constitute money laundering................................................................................................... 235

Indicator 75 - Implementation and operating level of the Financial Intelligence/Analysis/Investigation Unit at the international level ........................................... 237

Indicator 76 - Number of extradition requests for money laundering made by your country to other states and the number of replies received, in accordance with international agreements ........................................................................................................ 239

Indicator 77 - Number of extradition requests received by your country for money laundering, in accordance with international agreements ...................................................... 243

Indicator 78 - Number of requests made to other states to freeze assets in money laundering cases and the number of replies received, in accordance with international agreements ........................................................................................................ 247

Indicator 79 - Number of requests received to freeze assets in money laundering cases, in accordance with international agreements ............................................................................. 251

Indicator 80 - Number of requests made to other States to lift bank secrecy (1) in money laundering cases and the number of replies received, in accordance with international agreements ........................................................................................................ 255

Indicator 81 - Number of requests received to lift bank secrecy(1) in money laundering cases, in accordance with international agreements.............................................................. 257

Indicator 82 - Number of judges and prosecutors trained to enforce criminal laws to repress money laundering ................................................................................................................... 261

Indicator 83 - Number of administrative officials trained to enforce laws and regulations to control and repress money laundering ................................................................................... 263

DISPLACEMENT Indicator 84 - Displacement ......................................................................................................................... 265 Indicator 85 - Prevention, control and repression of Transnational Organized Crime in

relation to illicit drug trafficking and related crimes ………………….. Indicator 86 - Enforcement of laws against Transnational Organized Crime in relation to

illicit drug trafficking and related crimes ……………………………………………

Page 7: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Page 8: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

1 Implementation of a national anti-drug plan/strategy

INSTITUTION BUILDING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Existence of a Framework to Guide all Anti-Drug Activities

A. What is the current status of your national anti-drug plan/strategy (1)?

1. In force

2. Drafted but pending approval

3. Being drafted

4. Does not exist

B. 1. If your plan/strategy has been approved, extended or updated, please provide the

following details:

Date of Approval Date of Extension Date of Update Date of expiration

2. Please indicate the name of the highest authority which approves the national plan/ strategy.

Page 9: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

3. What other authority approves the national plan/ strategy?

Y N

a. Head of State/Government

b. Congress/National Assembly

c. National Drug Authority

d. Other (Specify)

C. 1. Please indicate which of the following areas it covers and the percentage of annual

activity (2) in accordance with the dates established in the national plan/ strategy.

Y N 2002 2003 2004

a. Demand Reduction (3)

b. Supply Reduction (4)

c. Alternative development (5)

d. Control Measures (6)

e. Institutional Framework (7)

f. Program Evaluation (8)

g. Others (specify)

Page 10: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. 1. Please indicate if the national plan/ strategy identifies the institutional framework of the national anti-drug system and territorial areas coordinated by the national drug authority:

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate at which level:

Y

a.

Central

b.

Provincial

c.

Departmental

d.

State

e.

Municipal

3. If your country carries out decentralized policies, how many municipal governments

execute local plans(9)? Please provide the following information:

a. Total country population: b. Total number of country municipalities: c. Number of municipalities executing municipal plans: d. Total number of inhabitants benefited:

E. Observations:

Page 11: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) National anti-drug plan/ strategy means the instrument that summarizes national policies, defines priorities, assigns responsibilities to the institutions that plan, coordinate and develop the integral prevention of the illicit use and traffic of drugs, as well as related offenses. This is in keeping with the Anti-Drug Strategy in the Hemisphere 1998 and the decisions adopted at the Presidential Summit of Santiago, Chile that same year. It also identifies the economic resources needed for its implementation and control system; as well as follow up and evaluation of institutional efforts.

(2) Percentage of annual activity: Percentage of the activities stated in the national anti-drug plan/strategy which has been completed in that year.

(3) Demand Reduction includes drug abuse prevention programs for all cross sections of the general population and high-risk groups, as well as treatment and rehabilitation of drug addicts, and programs/measures to reduce harm to health caused by drugs.

(4) Supply Reduction refers to activities focused on reducing the availability of illicit drugs. This involves law enforcement, regulatory control and interdiction activities carried out by police, Customs, administrative entities, the Coast Guard and others.

(5) Alternative Development as defined by the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) New York, 1998, is “a process to prevent and eliminate illicit cultivation of plants containing narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances through specifically designed rural development measures in the context of sustained national economic growth and sustainable development efforts in countries taking action against drugs, recognizing the particular socio-cultural characteristics of the target communities and groups, within the framework of a comprehensive and permanent solution to the problem of illicit drugs.”

(6) Control Measures are the laws and regulations that govern all aspects of the drug issue.

(7) Institutional Framework identifies the different agencies, private and public, responsible for carrying out the activities corresponding to each area.

(8) Program Evaluation identifies the mechanisms established to evaluate all programs set forth in the national anti-drug plan/strategy and their results.

(9) Local plans refer to the execution of programs and projects by municipal governments on prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, reintegration and epidemiological research, through a municipal coordination commission or similar entity, where civil society and local public agencies are represented.

Page 12: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2 Financing the National Anti-Drug Strategy/Plan

INSTITUTION BUILDING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Existence of a financial structure for the national anti-drug plan/strategy

A. 1. Is there a budget (1) for financing the national anti-drug plan/strategy?

Y N

If the answer is “yes”, please proceed to question B1.

2. If there is no budget, please explain how the activities of the national anti-drug strategy

are financed.

B. What are the sources of financing for the national plan budget?

Y N

1.

Direct allocation from the central government (2)

2.

The budgets of the ministries or central agencies (3)

3.

Self-financing (application of the law) (4)

4.

Contributions from civil society (5)

5.

International cooperation (6)

6.

Other (specify)

Page 13: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. If there is a budget for the national plan, indicate the actual (7) budget for the following years:

Year Approved budget

(US$) Actual budget

(US$) *(A) *(B) *(C) *(D) *(E) *(F)

2002 2003 2004

TOTAL

*(A) Percentage of actual allocation from the central government *(B) Percentage of actual allocation from provincial, state, or departmental governments *(C) Percentage of actual allocation from municipal governments *(D) Percentage from self-financing *(E) Percentage from international contributions *(F) Percentage from civil society contributions

D. Please indicate the amount allocated in the budget by area of the national anti-drug plan:

Area Actual amount

in 2002 Actual amount

in 2003 Actual Amount

in 2004

1. Demand Reduction

2. Supply Reduction 3. Alternative Development 4. Control Measures 5. Total budget

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Page 14: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Budget for financing the national anti-drug plan/strategy is the total actual budget and other technical assistance, technological, and logistical resources, allocated by public and private institutions at the central, regional (provincial, state, departmental) and municipal levels, as well as in the form of international cooperation, to carry out activities under the national drug plan.

(2) Allocation from the central government refers to that portion of the budget financed with public funds from the national government for the implementation of activities and projects in each area.

(3) The budgets of the ministries or central agencies refers to resources allocated by the ministries or central agencies, including the cooperation of other central public and private agencies as well as international assistance for carrying out programs in the corresponding area of the national anti-drug plan. (4) Self-financing (application of the law) refers to specific funds allocated by law, apart from those allocated from the approved budget, such as proceeds from the confiscation of property, fines, contributions, or taxes/duties.

(5) Contributions from civil society refer to donations and financial or in-kind assistance for the execution of activities or projects.

(6) International cooperation refers to contributions from countries or international organizations in the form of cash, equipment, and/or technical support, to cooperate in the execution of national strategy projects. These include contributions from public or private, national or local organizations in the cooperating country.

(7) Actual budget refers to funds actually used to execute programs or projects identified in the national strategy.

Page 15: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

3 Attributes of the National Drug Authority

INSTITUTION BUILDING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Determine the Existence of a Framework to Coordinate all the National Anti-Drug System Activities

A. 1. Is the coordination (1) of implementation of the national anti-drug plan/strategy carried

out by the national drug authority (2)? Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate which areas it coordinates:

Y N

a. Demand Reduction

b. Supply Reduction

c. Alternative Development

d. Control Measures

e. Institutional Framework

f. Program Evaluation

g. Others (specify)

3. If the answer is “no”, please indicate the existing anti-drug activity coordination.

Page 16: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. 1. Please indicate if the legal basis of the national authority has been updated.

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate the changes or updates of the national authority’s

legal framework.

3. Please indicate the institutions that make up the central managing level of the national

authority and which is the rank of representatives from each of the institutions:

Name of institutions that make up the national authority’s central managing level

Rank of representative of each institution (minister, vice-minister)

4. Please indicate if the national authority has a central office (e.g. an Executive

Secretariat) to carry out its mandates.

Y N

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

Page 17: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Coordination is the work performed by the national authority as the leading government agency (guiding policy, strategy, and the national anti-drug system) that directs the design and execution of the national strategy and plans in which government ministries, provincial, state, and municipal governments and civil society organizations participate in the framework of a national anti-drug system. (2) National Drug Authority refers to the central government body responsible for coordinating and follow up of the national anti-drug plan/ strategy. In some cases the national authorities have operational functions.

Page 18: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

4 Budget for the National Drug Authority

INSTITUTION BUILDING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Establish a Financial Structure to Coordinate all Anti-Drug Activities

A. 1. Is there an annual budget (1) for the national authority?

Y N

If the answer is “yes”, please proceed to B1 2. If the answer is “no”, please explain how the activities of the national authority are

financed.

B. 1. Is the national authority’s budget integrated with the budget of another government

agency or independent?

a. Integrated

b. Independent

Page 19: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2. What are the sources for the budget of the national authority?

Y N

a. Government Allocation (2)

b. Self-financing (Application of the law) (3)

c. Civil society contributions (4)

d. International cooperation (5)

e. Others (specify)

C. If there is an annual budget for the national authority, please indicate the total of the received

budget for the following years:

Year

Proposed budget (US$)

(6)

Approved budget (US$) (7)

Total budget received (US$) (8) *(A) *(B) *(C) *(D)

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

*(A) Government allocation percentage *(B) Self-financing percentage *(C) International contribution percentage *(D) Civil society contribution percentage

D. 1. Please indicate if your budget is adequate.

Y N

2. If the answer is “no”, please explain the reasons.

Page 20: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) An annual budget for the national authority is one that facilitates the administration of its structure, functions, and obligations, (e.g., information and statistics related to the drug problem; follow up and evaluation of institutional efforts) according to its regulations; as well as any operational activities that might be included in its mandates. This budget is not meant to cover the cost of specialized agencies in the areas of demand reduction, supply reduction, alternative development, control measures and others in the national plan/ strategy. (2) Government allocation refers to the part of the operational budget that is funded by money allocated to the national authority by the specific government office that oversees its activities. (3) Self-financing (application of the law) is specific funds assigned under the law apart from those allocated within the approved budget, for example, proceeds from the confiscation of goods, fines, contributions, and taxes/rates.

(4) Civil society contributions are financial assistance or in-kind donations for the execution of activities or projects of the national authority. (5) International cooperation refers to donations from countries or international organizations that are made in financial instruments, equipment and/or technical support in order to support the work of the national authority. (6) Proposed budget is the budget proposed by the national authority to its government in order to be able to fulfill institutional objectives. (7) Approved budget is the budget that has been approved by the government for the national drug authority to implement the different activities and projects. (8) Total budget received is the total operating budget of the national authority, including all contributions from the civil society, international contributions and self-financing.

Page 21: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

5 Ratified international conventions

TREATIES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Determine the Existence of a Legal Framework to Guide all Anti-Drug Activities

A. 1. Indicate if your country signed/ratified (1) any of the following international conventions:

Convention Date of Signing

Date of Ratification

a. 1. UN Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime, 2000

2. Protocol to the above Convention against the

Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air. 3. Protocol to the above Convention to Prevent,

Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children.

4. Protocol to the above Convention Against the Illicit

Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition.

b. Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials, 1997

c. Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, 1996 d. Inter-American Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal

Matters, 1992

e. UN Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988

f. UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971 g. UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 as amended

by the 1972 Protocol

B. Please indicate any reservations (2) made by your country to any of the above treaties.

Page 22: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. 1. Has your country enacted any legislation or regulations in accordance with the aforementioned international conventions during the evaluation period 2003-2004?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate by each international convention the thematic

area covered and the pertinent legislation including its date of enactment.

International Convention Thematic Area Legislation/Date of Enactment

D. 1. Is there a national follow-up mechanism in place to assess the effective application of the mandates established in the international conventions?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate the mechanisms used:

Y N

a. Interagency Committee

b. Interagency information systems/networks (3)

c. Interagency communications systems/networks (4)

d. Others (specify)

Page 23: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Indicate the countries with which bilateral cooperation agreements have been signed by your

country in the context of the aforementioned international conventions.

Agreement title Country

F. Observations:

G. Agency providing information:

H. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Ratification is the formal confirmation subsequent to signature by a state that it is bound by a treaty. It includes “accession”, “acceptance” or “approval”, formal measures that communicate the express consent of a state to be bound by the treaty. (2) Reservation means a unilateral statement made by a state upon signature or ratification of a treaty that the state is opting out from the application of a certain provision or provisions thereof. (3) Interagency information systems/networks refers to computerized or manual information databases to which the agencies have common access. (4) Interagency communications systems/networks refers to a system that links the various agencies and facilitates information exchange among officials.

Page 24: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

6 Data collection capacity

INFORMATION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Promote a Country’s Capacity for Collecting and Analyzing Drug-Related Statistics and Other Information

A. 1. Does your government have a centralized office at the national/Federal level (1) (e.g., a

national observatory on drugs (2) or similar) that organizes, compiles and coordinates drug-related statistics and other drug-related information?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please provide the name of the office and contact point.

3. If the answer is “no”, please indicate how your government gathers and reports drug-

related statistics and other drug-related information.

B. 1. Does your country participate in CICAD’s Inter-American Uniform Drug Use Data System (SIDUC) to collect, analyze and report statistics on drug consumption?

Y N

Page 25: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2. If the answer is “yes”, which studies have you carried out in 2003-2004?

2003 2004

Study

Yes No Yes No

a. Survey of Treatment Center patients

b. Survey of Emergency Room patients

c. Consumption of psychoactive substances in Forensic Medicine

d. Survey of Juvenile Offenders

e. Survey of Secondary School Students

f. Survey of Higher Education Students

g. Survey of National Households

h. Survey of sale price of Drugs

i. Others (specify)

3. If the answer is “no”, please indicate what alternative methodology you are using to

collect, analyze and report drug use statistics:

C. 1. Does your country use CICAD’s Uniform Statistical System on Control of the Supply Area (CICDAT) to collect and report statistics on supply-side control?

Y N

Page 26: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2. If the answer is “yes”, which CICDAT statistics has your country collected and reported

in 2003-2004?

2003 2004

Statistics on: Yes No Yes No

a. Quantity of drug seized b. Number of seizures, by drug type c. Seizures of chemical precursors d. Seizure of raw material or consumables e. Seizures of chemical products f. Seizures of pharmaceutical products g. Seizures of firearms, vehicles, real estate, money and

other equipment

h. Money Laundering i. Number of laboratories discovered and their potential

production capacity, by type of drug and geographic location

j. Cultivated areas of poppy and geographic location k. Cultivated areas of coca and geographic location l. Cultivated areas of marijuana and geographic location m. Areas removed from illicit cultivation by type of plant n. Persons arrested by type of offense, age group,

occupation and nationality

o. Persons tried by type of offense, age group, occupation and nationality

p. Persons charged by type of offense, age group, occupation and nationality

q. Persons convicted by type of offense, age group, occupation and nationality

r. Others (specify)

3. If the answer is “no”, please indicate what alternative methodology you are using to

collect, analyze and report supply control statistics.

D. Does your government report drug-related statistics on a regular basis (each year) to the

following:

Y N

1. International Narcotics Control Board

2. UNODC (3) Annual Report Questionnaire

Page 27: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Does your government have organized collections of drug-related documents (e.g. policy documents, drug use studies, in-depth reports on supply and demand reduction and drug control issues)?

Y N

F. 1. Is there a formal mechanism in place to evaluate the effectiveness of your country’s data collection capacity?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, what mechanisms or criteria are used to assess the effectiveness

of these means?

G. What obstacles does your government encounter in collecting, organizing, analyzing and

utilizing drug-related statistics and other drug-related documentation / information?

H. Observations:

I. Agency providing information:

J. Official providing information:

Page 28: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Some member states collect drug-related statistics at the state/provincial or city level. If that is the case in your country, please indicate in question A.3. (2) A National Observatory on Drugs is aimed primarily at collecting and analyzing drug-related statistics, conducting surveys, carrying out cross-disciplinary analyses of supply and demand data, and apply research findings to policy and practice, as well as collecting, organizing and disseminating drug-related information (documents, books, etc.) to support national programs. (3) The United Nations Office on Drug Control and Crime Prevention (ODCCP) was renamed the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), effective October 1, 2002.

Page 29: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

7 Information distribution capacity

INFORMATION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Promote the Country’s Capacity to Inform Policy-Makers and the General Public About the Drug Problem

A. How does your government distribute publicly available (non-classified) publications and

materials related to the drug problem? (indicate all that apply)

Y

1.

Web page (s)

2.

National Congressional Record/Official Gazette

a. Paper copy

b. Web page

3.

Libraries

4.

Schools/universities/research institutes

5.

National journals

6.

Press/media (1)

7.

Targeted e-mail, fax service or List serve (2)

8.

Publications and reports by the National Drug Authority and other government agencies

9.

Others (describe) (3)

Page 30: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. 1. Does your government operate a “Help Line”, information desk or similar that provides drug-related information to the general public?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please describe the nature of the service and an estimate of the

number of people using it.

C. Does your government distribute information on prevention, treatment and rehabilitation programs?

Y N

D. 1. Has your government developed innovative or more successful ways of providing drug-

related information to particular target audiences?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please describe briefly:

E. 1. Does your country use this information in addressing the drug problem?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please describe briefly:

Page 31: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. 1. Please indicate if your country has a budget to disseminate information (publications and materials) related to the drug problem.

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please provide the budget amounts.

2002 (US$) 2003 (US$) 2004 (US$)

G. Observations:

H. Agency providing information:

I. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Press/media includes press conferences/press releases.

(2) A List serve is an e-mailing list for special interest groups where registered members of the group can exchange and post information about a particular topic.

(3) May include TV and radio spots, posters, leaflets, etc.

Page 32: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

8 Implementation of a national system of drug abuse prevention programs that target key populations

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Assess the Extent and Coverage of the National System of Drug Abuse Prevention that Targets Key Populations

A. Is your country implementing a national system of drug abuse prevention programs (1) that

targets key populations? (2)

Y N

B. If the answer is “yes”, please complete the table below for each program that targeted the

following populations during 2003 and 2004.

Y N Key Populations Number of participants Describe type of program

1.

School-children and university students

Pre-school (specify age groups):_______________________

Primary (specify age groups):_______________________

Secondary (junior & high-school) (specify age groups):_______________________

Tertiary (university):

Page 33: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

(Continuation of Indicator 9.B) Y N KEY POPULATIONS Number of participants Describe type of program

2.

Community-based programs for youth (outside of the school system)

Working children (specify age groups):________________________

Street/abandoned children (specify age groups):___________

Other (specify)

3.

Community-based programs for adults

4.

Women

5.

Indigenous groups

6. Workplace(3) If yes, please indicate below whether drugs in the workplace programs exist in the public sector and/or the private sector, and the number of government departments or private companies with programs in place:

Public sector No. of Gov. departments

Private sector No. of Companies

7. Prisoners

8. Other groups at risk(4) Please specify:

____________________________

Page 34: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

E. Official providing information:

F. Bibliographic Information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Drug abuse prevention addresses the use of illicit drugs and the abuse/misuse of pharmaceuticals and other substances harmful to health such as inhalants, alcohol and tobacco. In general, a substance abuse prevention program is a sustained effort over time, with a planned curriculum or course of activities, backed up with written or audio-visual materials. Individual sporadic activities do not constitute a program.

(2) Programs that target key populations are those that develop and implement drug abuse prevention strategies that are tailored to the characteristics of that particular population group, context, gender, age and ethnicity (e.g. primary school or high school students, working children, women, indigenous groups, etc.).

(3) Drugs in the workplace programs may include drug and alcohol abuse prevention and education for employees and management; employee assistance programs; referral to and/or financial assistance for treatment for substance abuse; on-site facilities made available for Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous (AA / NA) groups; and written policies about non-use of drugs on the job.

(4) Other groups at risk: Each member state should determine those population groups that may, in that country, be at higher risk for drug abuse; other high-risk groups might typically include prostitutes, migrants, HIV-positive individuals, homeless people, street youth and injecting drug users.

Page 35: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

9 Existence of professional specialized training in drug abuse prevention, treatment and research

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Assess the National Capacity to Provide Professional Training in Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment

A. 1. During the period 2002-2004, were diplomas, university degrees or professional

education courses offered in your country or region (1) in drug abuse prevention, treatment, and/or research?

Y N

a.

Short refresher courses or in-service training (2) for teachers, social workers, health care workers, police officers, drug treatment counselors, prison guards, community leaders or others (please specify).

b.

Diplomas

c.

Undergraduate university-level courses

d.

Graduate/Postgraduate M.A. & Ph.D.

e.

Regional and international training abroad programs

f.

Other (Specify) ___________________

2. If the answer is “yes” to A.1.a, please list the short refresher courses or in-service

training courses in the table below:

How many participants?Name of short

refresher courses or in-service training

Prevention Treatment Research Offered to

whom? 2002 2003 2004

Page 36: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

3. If the answer is “yes” to A.1.b and A.1.c , please list the universities in your country that include content on prevention and/or treatment in general undergraduate curricula of the following disciplines associated with the drug abuse field:

Y N Discipline Name of University

a. Medical School

b. Psychology

c. Nursing School

d. Social Work

e. Sociology

f. Public Health

g. Other (specify)

4. If the answer is “yes” to A.1.d, please indicate the name(s) of the university or

universities that offer graduate level (M.A. or Ph.D.) inter-disciplinary degrees in the addictions, prevention, treatment and/or research for professionals working in fields related to drug abuse prevention and/or treatment (e.g., psychologists, social workers, psychiatrists, nurses, public health specialists, teachers, etc.).

Duration of Degree course

Number of graduates in 2002-2004

MA PhD

Name of

University

M.A

Programs

Ph.D.

Programs MA PhD 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004

Page 37: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

5. a. If the answer is “yes” to A.1.e, please provide details about regional and international study abroad programs.

b. Do the courses described above meet the national demand for professional

training in prevention and treatment?

Y N

c. What is the percentage of students accepted in relation to the number of

applicants?

d. Does your country have a system for the accreditation or licensing of demand reduction professionals?

Y N

e. If the answer is “yes”, please describe:

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

Page 38: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Region: In some parts of the Americas, such professional training is provided through sub regional (rather than national) universities and courses. (2) Short refresher courses or in-service training: Refers to brief training courses for practicing physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, social workers, psychologists, teachers, prison guards, etc, often required for professional accreditation or re-licensing.

Page 39: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

10 Evaluation of Prevention Programs

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Assess the Efficiency and Effectiveness(1) of Drug Abuse Prevention Programs

A. 1. In the past three years, has your country conducted evaluations of drug abuse

prevention programs?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please complete the table below:

Program/population evaluated (e.g. school-

based prevention, community programs,

prisoners, women, street children, gang members,

etc.)

Title of evaluation performed (2)

Type of evaluation

performed, methodology used

Year of program evaluation

(2002, 2003, 2004)

3. Please give a brief summary of evaluation findings.

B. Observations:

Page 40: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. Agency providing information:

D. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) An evaluation of effectiveness describes and analyses the changes (effects) produced before and after the application of preventative intervention. This is achieved through the values, conducts, psychological characteristics or any other process or variable selected as an element of change that should occur as a result of preventative intervention. At the same time, these elements can be evaluated quantitatively. (2) Please indicate the title of the evaluations, the institutions that carried out the evaluations and bibliographical information.

Page 41: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

11 Research of the Impact of prevention programs

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Assess the Long-term (1) Impact of Drug Abuse Prevention Programs

A. 1. Has your country conducted research (2) on the impact of prevention programs or “best

practices” during the past three years, or are any such research studies currently under way?

Y N

a. Public institutions

b. Private institutions

c. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs)

d. Universities

e. Other (Specify) __________

2. If yes, please complete the following table:

Program/populations assessed (e.g. school-

based prevention, community programs,

prisoners, women, street children, gang

members, etc.)

Title of study performed or under way

Year of publication of research

(2002, 2003, 2004)

Carried out by (specify research

institution or individual

researcher(s)

Page 42: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

3. Please describe the key findings of completed studies or research hypotheses of studies under way.

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

D. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Long-term impact means the impact over a 5 to 10 year basis. Evaluation of Impact: This is an assessment of outcomes of key actions or inputs relative to what would have occurred in the absence of an intervention. (2) Research on the impact of prevention programs attempts to assess the long-term effectiveness or impact that a particular prevention program has on drug-using behavior by program participants. Prevention research is designed to determine "what works in prevention" and designate model programs or "best practices". The research might take the form of longitudinal cohort studies to follow the drug using behavior over time of selected groups of people, case control studies, or other comparative assessments of the short- and long-term impacts of a particular drug abuse prevention program.

Page 43: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

12 Existence and application of guidelines or regulations on standards of care for drug abuse treatment

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Assess the Quality of Drug Abuse Treatment Programs

A. 1. Has your government (national, state/ provincial or local) established guidelines or

regulations on standards of care for drug abuse treatment (1)?

Y N

a. National

b. State/Provincial

c. Local

2. If the answer is “yes”, please provide the title of the document and annex its contents:

3. Are these guidelines voluntary or mandatory?

Y N

a. Voluntary

b. Mandatory

4. If mandatory, indicate whether legislation exists to support these guidelines. (If so, please provide the title of the legislation or executive decree and date of passage).

Page 44: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

5. If voluntary, please indicate how the guidelines are implemented.

B. Does your Government keep a national registry (2) of treatment services (facilities) and

programs?

Y N

C. 1. Does your Government have instruments for accrediting(3) treatment services (facilities)

and programs?

Y N

2. What is the methodology for accreditation of these guidelines?

3. If the answer to B and/or C above is yes, please indicate which government agency is in

charge of registration and accreditation of treatment facilities and programs:

a. National Drug Authority

b. Ministry of Health

c. Other (Specify) _______________________________

D. 1. Is there a national mechanism to oversee adherence to the standards of care for drug

treatment and to evaluate the quality of services provided?

Y N

Page 45: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2. What is the methodology to oversee adherence?

3. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate which Agency is in charge of oversight and evaluation:

a. National Drug Authority

b. Ministry of Health

c. Joint Commissions (such as Health Ministry/ National Drug Authority)

d. Other (Specify) ______________

4. With what frequency are evaluations of the quality of treatment services carried out?

a. Twice a year

b. Annually

c. Other (Specify) ______________

5. Please indicate briefly the evaluation results:

E. Observations:

Page 46: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Standards of care for drug abuse treatment are Government-set guidelines that public and private drug treatment facilities (clinics, hospitals, centers, whether in-patient or outpatient) should follow to assure professional care of patients. Such guidelines are generally agreed upon by the Ministry of Health and the drug treatment providers. This includes treatment of alcohol abuse.

(2) National registry of treatment programs means a list or directory of programs and services offered. A listing in the national registry does not necessarily mean that the quality of the services has been evaluated or is guaranteed. (3) Accreditation of a drug treatment program or center is a license, permit, or other certification, issued by the government or professional accreditation board, which allows the program to offer treatment services and provides a level of quality guarantee of those services.

Page 47: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

13

Characteristics of drug treatment and rehabilitation programs that include early intervention (detection), treatment, rehabilitation, social reintegration and aftercare

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Assess the Coverage and Appropriateness of the National Drug Treatment, Rehabilitation and Social Reintegration Services

A. Please indicate below which drug treatment modalities exist in your country. Also, indicate

whether they are public or private (private may include NGOs, religious groups, private medical services) and how many treatment programs(1) exist.

Public Private Type of Target Population Adults Minors Programs Yes

No

How

many?

Yes No How

many? M F M F

1. Ambulatory (Outpatient) (2)

2. Residential (in-patient) (3)

3. Clinics (AM / PM) (4)

4. Other (specify) ____________

B. Please indicate below which drug treatment services exist in your country, whether they are

public or private (private may include NGOs, religious groups, private medical services) how many and geographic coverage:

Public Private Geographic Coverage

Services Y N

how many?

Y N how

many? Municipal Regional National

1. Network for early detection, outreach and referral of cases (5)

2. Detoxification (6)

3. Treatment(7) & rehabilitation ( 8)

4. Social reintegration and aftercare (9)

5. Self-help groups (10)

6. Other (describe) ________________

Page 48: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. Please indicate your reinsertion programs.

D. How many treatment centers(11) are geared specifically towards women?

E. How many treatment centers are geared specifically towards adolescents?

F. Observations:

G. Agency providing information:

H. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Treatment program: Refers to services offered (in-patient residential less than 28 days, in-patient residential of more than 28 days, out-patient, intensive out-patient, aftercare, such as half-way houses and other social services, workforce support programs, and acute medical management of detoxification). Note that a treatment center or facility may offer several types of treatment programs, all of which should be listed separately. Please do not include here self-help groups such as AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) or NA (Narcotics Anonymous). Therapeutic community inpatient programs should not be listed separately, but rather included in the overall count of residential programs.

Page 49: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

TREATMENT MODALITIES

(2) Ambulatory drug treatment: A center or service where patients receive periodic treatment. It includes people that receive outpatient care and community outreach services. (3) Residential drug treatment: A center where the patient lives in a closed facility during treatment; for example, the therapeutic community model where treatment could last 3 months, 6 months, or one year.

(4) Clinic (AM/PM): A semi-open institution that offers treatment services that permit the patient to receive treatment and continue to work, study and maintain family ties at the same time. Can be used as part of the social reintegration process after the patient has left the residential center. For example, a patient who works but needs treatment could work during the day and receive treatment at night or receive treatment during the day and maintain family life at night. TYPES OF TREATMENT SERVICES Drug treatment and rehabilitation are generally understood as a continuum of care with different modalities for different patients at various stages of their recovery, and usually require a network of services, which may include: (5) Early detection and outreach: Social and health workers in the community seek out drug users, provide them with counseling and advice on general health, and encourage them to enter treatment programs and contact health services. (6) Detoxification: A service that offers attention to the patient in order to alleviate symptoms of withdrawal from drugs. This phase prepares the patient to enter longer-term treatment. (7) Treatment: Care (e.g., pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, cognitive behavior therapy, etc.) provided by multidisciplinary teams of specialists to address the medical consequences of drug dependence and associated problematic psychosocial behaviors. May include relapse prevention and family therapy. Treatment may be provided in outpatient centers, therapeutic communities, and residential care in clinics or hospitals, such as "day hospitals" and self-help groups. Most treatment involves a combination of the above, depending on the individual patient, his or her family circumstances, and the drug(s) used. (8) Rehabilitation: provides social support and involves community services (housing, education, employment, job training) to help former drug users achieve a stable and fulfilling life without the use of drugs. May include halfway houses, "drug courts", drop-in centers, or other modalities provided in cooperation with the Ministries of Justice or Social Services. (9) Social Reintegration and Aftercare: generally includes all elements of rehabilitation and relapse prevention, and may also include preparing the neighborhood, local community, the family and/or the workplace to deal with the former drug user. (10) Self-help Groups: Groups known as AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) and NA (Narcotics Anonymous). Note: Countries and service providers define the continuum of care in different ways and under different names. The above definitions are merely indicative of the various types of care offered for drug dependent persons. (11) A Treatment Center is any agency or unit that provides treatment to people with drug problems. Treatment

centers can be based within structures that are medical or non-medical, governmental or non-governmental, public or private, specialized or non-specialized.

Page 50: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

14 Demand for treatment

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Assess National Drug Treatment Capacity

A. Please indicate in the following table the number of patients who sought and received

treatment in your country.

Year *(A) *(B) Data Source

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

*(A) Total number of patients who received treatment, or number of treatment episodes (1) (specify which

system of measurement is used) _________________ *(B) Estimated number of people who sought treatment (2) in the year indicated but did not receive it

B. Please indicate in the following table the number of treatment programs in your country.

Year *(C) *(D) Data Source

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

*(C) Total number of treatment programs (3) in your country *(D) Number of new treatment programs opened in the year indicated.

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

E. Official providing information:

Page 51: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Some countries collect information on the number of patients receiving treatment (either during the year or on a given day), while others gather information on all admissions, or treatment episodes. A treatment episode is one admission to a treatment program during the course of a year. This measure does not track individuals, and therefore if one person was admitted five times, those five admissions will constitute five treatment episodes. Please indicate in the table whether your country measures the number of patients or the total number of admissions. (2) While it is recognized that it is difficult to measure the estimated number of people seeking treatment, a variety of approaches exists. A simple and cost effective approach is to estimate how many new treatment programs have opened during the course of a single year, presumably in response to increased demand. If another methodology is used to estimate the number of people seeking treatment, please include this information under section B. Observations. An example of a more complex method may be the use of intake records of treatment programs to provide information not only on the number of persons admitted to treatment, but also on the number of people screened but not admitted due to lack of available treatment slots in the program. (3) Treatment program: Refers to services offered (in-patient residential less than 28 days, in-patient residential of more than 28 days, out-patient, intensive out-patient, aftercare, such as half-way houses and other social services, workforce support programs, and acute medical management of detoxification). Note that a treatment center or facility may offer several types of treatment programs, and all should be listed separately. Please do not include here self-help groups such as AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) or NA (Narcotics Anonymous). Therapeutic community inpatient programs should not be listed separately, but rather included in the overall count of residential programs.

Page 52: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

15

Results of studies to evaluate various treatment and rehabilitation programs and modalities in order to assess their effectiveness

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Evaluation of the Impact/Effectiveness of Early Intervention, Drug Abuse Treatment, and Rehabilitation and After-care Programs

A. 1. Have studies (1) been conducted in your country to evaluate the various early

intervention (2), drug abuse treatment, rehabilitation and after-care/social reintegration programs and modalities in order to assess their effectiveness?

Y N

a. Early intervention

b. Treatment

c. Rehabilitation

d. After-care/social reintegration

If the answer is “no”, please elaborate in section B. Observations. 2. If the answer is “yes”, please describe your criteria for determining successful treatment

of drug-dependent persons (e.g., drug-free after 6 months, one year, two years, etc.)

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

Page 53: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) This type of study is designed to measure, inter alia, the extent to which patients in drug treatment remain drug-free after a certain period of time and the success in matching treatment to patient. Some treatment programs in some member states treat certain types of drug dependence with other drugs and therefore the treatment goal is not necessarily to have a patient be drug-free. If that is the case in your country, please so state in the Observations section above, and describe, succinctly, the treatment protocols and expected outcomes.

(2) Early Intervention: therapeutic intervention with a person who has used drugs occasionally or recreationally, to try to prevent dependency.

Page 54: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

16 Prevalence of Drug Abuse

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine Trends in Drug Abuse

A. Do you have an estimate for the prevalence of drug abuse (1) among the general population of

the country as a whole (2) or for a part of the country or a part of the population (3)?

1. No - Please elaborate in section D. Observations below.

2.

Yes – an estimate for the general population of the country as a whole (go to Table A below)

3. Yes – an estimate for part of the country or part of the population (go to Table B below)

Note: The tables below may be copied as often as necessary in order to report the findings of several surveys conducted during the year.

Page 55: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. What is the estimated prevalence (Lifetime, last 12 months, last 30 days) of drug abuse expressed as a percentage of the general population? Please specify by gender.

TABLE A – PREVALENCE IN THE GENERAL POPULATION

Year of Survey: Age Group Surveyed:

Lifetime (percentage)

Last 12 months (percentage)

Last 30 days (percentage)

Type of drug M F

Total population

(4) M F

Total population

(4) M F

Total population

(4)

1. Alcohol 2. Tobacco 3. Solvents & Inhalants 4. Cannabis Type 4a Hashish 4b Marijuana 4c Other Cannabis Type 5. Hallucinogens 5a LSD 5b PCP 5c Other hallucinogens 6. Opioids 6a Heroin 6b Morphine* 6c Opium 6d Other Opioids* 7. Cocaine Type 7a Basuco, or coca paste 7b Cocaine HCL 7c Crack 7d Other Cocaine Type 8. Tranquilizers / Sedatives/

Depressants

8a Barbiturates * 8b Benzodiazepines* 8c Flunitrazepam (Rohypnol®)* 8d GHB 8e Ketamine 8f Other Tranquilizer/Sedative/

Depressant

9. Stimulants 9a Amphetamines 9b MDMA (Ecstasy) (5) 9c Methamphetamines 9d Other Stimulants

10. Other drugs (6) 11. All illicit drugs

*Non-prescribed/non-therapeutic use only

If an estimate results in a zero prevalence rate please note as 0. If you have an estimate of the NUMBERS of users, please convert these into percentages of the reference population.

Page 56: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. Estimate for part of the population or part of the country (e.g., capital city only; large cities; particular region or province; high school students; university students; emergency rooms; detention centers; treatment centers, medical examiners’ reports). Please state whether or not the survey method used a sample of the population or institutions.

Table B – PREVALENCE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Year of Survey:

Estimate for part of the population or part of the country to which estimate applies: _________________________

Representative sample: (7) Y N

Lifetime (percentage)

Last 12 months (percentage)

Last 30 days (percentage)

Type of drug

M F Total(4) M F Total(4) M F Total(4)

1. Alcohol 2. Tobacco 3. Solvents & Inhalants 4. Cannabis Type 4a Hashish 4b Marijuana 4c Other Cannabis Type 5. Hallucinogens 5a LSD 5b PCP 5c Other hallucinogens 6. Opioids 6a Heroin 6b Morphine* 6c Opium 6d Other Opioids* 7. Cocaine Type 7a Basuco, or coca paste 7b Cocaine HCL 7c Crack 7d Other Cocaine Type 8. Tranquilizers / Sedatives/

Depressants

8a Barbiturates * 8b Benzodiazepines* 8c Flunitrazepam (Rohypnol®)* 8d GHB 8e Ketamine

8f Other Tranquilizers/Sedatives/ Depressants

9. Stimulants 9a Amphetamines 9b MDMA (Ecstasy) (5) 9c Methamphetamines 9d Other Stimulants

10. Other drugs (6) 11. All illicit drugs

* Non-prescribed/non-therapeutic use only

Page 57: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

G. Please provide bibliographical references:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) The prevalence of drug abuse is defined as the number of people who used a drug during a specified period of time divided by the total number of people in the population at that time. There are three drug prevalence rates that are typically measured: The LIFETIME prevalence of substance abuse determines the proportion of people who have used a particular drug at any time in their lives( who have ever used a drug). Prevalence during the PAST 12 MONTHS provides information on the proportion of people who have used a drug at least once in the past year. Prevalence during the PAST 30 DAYS provides information on the proportion of people who are probably regular users (sometimes referred to as “problematic” or “chronic” users). (2) Prevalence data on drug abuse among the general population of the country as a whole are typically gathered by means of a national household survey, using a representative sample. If your country has conducted one or more national household surveys, please use TABLE A to report prevalence rates. (3) Information on prevalence of drug abuse among specific populations, such as high school students, university students, arrestees, etc., may be obtained through surveys of a representative sample of the particular population group, either in the country as a whole, or in particular geographic regions such as the capital city or large cities. If your country has prevalence data for a particular sub-population or for only one geographical area, please use TABLE B to report the estimates.

Page 58: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

(4) Total refers to the percentage of male and female drug users in the referenced population.

(5) May include non-MDMA stimulants identified as “ecstasy” by user. (6) Other drugs might include peyote, ayawaska, hallucinogenic mushrooms, or chewing of coca leaf, or combinations of drugs.

(7) Representative sample: if your country uses other (non-statistical) estimation methods to determine prevalence, or the proportionate use of drugs (qualitative methods, rapid assessments, etc.) please report those estimates in indicator 20, and not in the present indicator.

Page 59: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

17 Average age of first use of any drug

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine Trends in Drug Abuse

A. What is the average age of the first use of alcohol or any drug in your country, by gender?

If study did not cover the general population of the country as a whole, specify the part of the population (1) or part of the country to which this estimate applies:__________________

General population(2)

Year: ________

Specific population (3)

________________________________

Year: _________

Type of drug M F Average (4) M F Average(4)

1. Alcohol 2. Tobacco 3. Solvents & Inhalants 4. Cannabis Type 4a Hashish 4b Marijuana 4c Other Cannabis Type 5. Hallucinogens 5a LSD 5b PCP 5c Other hallucinogens 6. Opioids 6a Heroin 6b Morphine* 6c Opium 6d Other Opioids* 7. Cocaine Type 7a Basuco, or coca paste 7b Cocaine HCL 7c Crack 7d Other Cocaine Type 8. Tranquilizers / Sedatives/ Depressants 8a Barbiturates * 8b Benzodiazepines* 8c Flunitrazepam (Rohypnol®)* 8d GHB 8e Ketamine 8f Other Tranquilizer/ Sedative/

Depressant

9. Stimulants 9a Amphetamines 9b MDMA (Ecstasy) (5) 9c Methamphetamines 9d Other Stimulants 10. Other drugs (6) 11. All illicit drugs

*Non-prescribed/non-therapeutic use only

Page 60: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

D. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Population: If your country uses other (non-statistical) estimation methods to determine average age of first use of any drugs (qualitative methods, rapid assessments, etc.), please report those estimates in Indicator # 20, and not in this indicator. (2) General Population: Refers to a sample of individuals which represent the entire population of your country. (3) Specific Population: Refers to a sample of individuals which represent a specific segment of the population of your country (children, teenagers, executives, etc.). Please indicate the specific population(s) surveyed. (4) Weighted average: Average age of persons of both genders. Method of calculations is as follows: Add ages of males and females and divide by the total number of persons (both genders) in the group.

(5) May include non-MDMA stimulants identified as “ecstasy” by user. (6) Other drugs might include peyote, ayawaska, hallucinogenic mushrooms and chewing of coca leaf and combinations of drugs.

Page 61: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

18 Percentage of youth aged 10-19 that perceive drug use as harmful to health and well-being

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Assess Attitudes Towards Drug use among High School Students

A. 1. Does your country have an estimate of the number or percentage of youth aged 10-19

that perceive drug use as being harmful to their health and well-being(1)?

Y N

2. a. If the answer is “yes”, please provide the percentage: ___________% b. Has the research shown a change over time in the perceived risk associated with drug use?

Y N

c. If the answer is “yes”, please explain nature and extent of the change.

B. 1. Can you correlate that perception with drug use among the same population?

Y N

2. a. If the answer is “yes”, please provide a description of the population under study

and the year the study was carried out.

Page 62: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

b. Describe the methodology used and a brief description of the key findings.

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

E. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Health and well-being: Some research has shown that the higher the perceived risk associated with drug use, the lower the rate of drug use among that population.

Page 63: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

19 Drug-related morbidity

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Health Consequences of Injecting Drug Use

A. 1. Do you have an estimate of drug-related morbidity (1) among injecting drug users in your

country?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please provide the following:

Disease

Estimated number of infected

persons in the general population

Estimated number of injecting drug

users

Estimated number of infected

injecting drug users

Year in which data were gathered

a. Hepatitis B b. Hepatitis C c. HIV d. Other

B. 1. Has your country ever produced estimates of the strength of association between drug use and any of the above diseases?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please provide the following:

Disease

Methodology used

Estimated strength of

association (2)

Year in which the study was carried

out

Bibliographical information

a. Hepatitis B b. Hepatitis C c. HIV d. Other

Page 64: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. 1. Does your country gather data from any of the following sources to provide data to identify the morbidity associated with drug abuse?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate the following:

Y N Sources of Information

a. Medical Examiners’ reports

b. Emergency Room reports

c. Drug-related law enforcement reports

d. Other (Specify) _______________________

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Page 65: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Drug-related morbidity means cases of disease directly or generally attributable to drug consumption, particularly among injecting drug users. This indicator does NOT address psychiatric morbidity attributed to drug consumption or questions of co-morbidity, which are matters still under debate. (2) Strength of Association is a tool for deriving causal inference and is used to measure whether excess risk of developing one of the mentioned diseases is associated with injecting drug use. Measures of strength of association may include the calculation of Relative Risk. Other measurements for strength of association may include Odds Ratios, or measures of Attributable Risk (The amount or proportion of disease incidence (disease risk) that can be attributed to injecting drug use). Example:

Risk in Injecting Drug Population

__a__ a+b

Relative Risk =

______________________________________ = ___________

Risk in the Non-Injecting Drug Population __c__ c+d

Risk: The Incidence of the disease in the population studied. In other words the number of new cases of the disease in the population over the course of the period studied (regardless of injecting drug use). References: A Dictionary of Epidemiology, John Last, Robert Spasoff, Susan Harris; 4th Ed. Oxford University Press, 2000. Epidemiology, Leon Gordis, WB Saunders Company, 1996.

Page 66: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

20 New trends in drug abuse

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine Trends in Drug Abuse

A. 1. Have new drugs or new patterns of administration of drugs been reported in the past

three years in your country(1)?

Y N

If the answer is “no”, please go to indicator #21.

2. Which new drugs have been reported?

Year Name of new drugs

2002 2003 2004

3. Which new routes of administration have been reported?

Year New Routes of Administration

2002 2003 2004

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

Page 67: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) If your country does not have data based on surveys, registers or formal methods of estimation of prevalence and trends, this indicator may be answered on the basis of informed expert opinions gathered through qualitative research, focus groups, networks of drug epidemiologists, researchers, physicians, law enforcement personnel, etc. Under “B. Observations”, please describe briefly how your country gathered the information reported in this indicator.

Page 68: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

21 Drug-related mortality

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine Consequences of Drug Use

A. 1. Do you have an estimate of the number of drug-related deaths (1) in your country?

Y N

Page 69: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2. If the answer is “yes”, please complete the table below:

YEAR TO WHICH ESTIMATE APPLIES: _____________________

PLEASE IDENTIFY THE CLASSIFICATION USED: ICD - 9 ICD -10 DSM IV - R Other ______________________

Type of drug Estimated number of drug-related deaths

Male Average

Age Female

Average Age

Total Population

1. Alcohol 2. Tobacco 3. Solvents & Inhalants 4. Cannabis Type

4a Hashish 4b Marihuana 4c Other types of Cannabis 5. Hallucinogens

5a LSD 5b PCP 5c Other hallucinogens 6. Opioids

6a Heroin 6b Morphine* 6c Opium 6d Other Opioids* 7. Cocaine Type

7a Basuco, or coca paste 7b Cocaine HCL 7c Crack 7d Other Cocaine Type 8. Tranquilizers / Sedatives/

Depressants

8a Barbiturates * 8b Benzodiazepines* 8c Flunitrazepam (Rohypnol®)* 8d GHB 8e Ketamine 8f Other Tranquilizer/Sedative/

Depressant

9. Stimulants 9a Amphetamines 9b MDMA (Ecstasy) (2) 9c Methamphetamines 9d Other Stimulants 10. Other drugs 11. All illicit drugs

*Non-prescribed/non-therapeutic use only

Page 70: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. If your country has another system for reporting indirect or attributable deaths to these substances, please describe here:

C. If your country has a system to collect data on drug content or drug toxicity levels in the body

associated with drug-related mortality, please describe here:

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Drug-related deaths are understood as deaths directly attributable to or induced by the use of drugs (legal and illegal use), including drug overdose, accidental poisoning and suicide from medically-prescribed and other drugs. This category normally excludes accidents, homicides and other causes indirectly related to drug use, as well as newborn deaths associated with the mother’s drug use. According to World Health Organization regulations, the causes of death are to be classified according to the current Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Disease, Injuries and Causes of Death (DSM IV-R), as well as the Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9). Please indicate in the observations section whether your country’s estimate of drug-related deaths is classified as described above, or whether the category includes other causes. Medical examiners reports are a likely source of information on drug-related mortality, or possibly emergency room data. (2) May included non-MDMA stimulants identified as “ecstasy” by user.

Page 71: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

22 Drug use and related accidents and crime

DEMAND REDUCTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Relationship between Drug Use and Crime, and between Drug Use and Accidents

A. 1. Does your country have data on drug use and related accidents and crime?

Y N

2. If the answer is “no”, please explain:

B. 1. Does your country have an estimate of drug or alcohol use by recent arrestees (1)

immediately prior to their arrest? (2)

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please provide percentage of arrestees related to drug and

alcohol use, by gender and the date of the latest survey:

M F

Date of latest survey: ____________________ C. 1. Does your country keep records on alcohol- and drug-related traffic accidents?

Y N

Page 72: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2. If the answer is “yes”, please provide the percentage of traffic accidents in 2002, 2003

and 2004 in which alcohol and/or drugs were a contributing factor:

2002 2003 2004

Alcohol Drugs Alcohol Drugs Alcohol Drugs

D. 1. Does your country keep records on alcohol and drug-related accidents in the workplace?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please provide the percentage of workplace accidents in 2002,

2003 and 2004 in which alcohol and/or drugs were a contributing factor:

2002 2003 2004

Alcohol Drugs Alcohol Drugs Alcohol Drugs

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Page 73: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Recent arrestee: A person arrested within the previous 48 hours.

(2) Immediately prior to arrest: Drug or alcohol use within 3 days prior to the arrest.

Page 74: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

23 Area cultivated and potential production of raw materials and drugs, by type of plant

DRUG PRODUCTION AND ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Reduction of Illicit Cultivation of plants for Drug Production

A. What is the total area of illicit crops (1)? Please answer using hectares (2) as the unit of

measure.

Area cultivated Plant 2002 2003 2004

1. Marijuana 2. Coca 3. Poppy

B. What is the potential production of raw material (3)?

Potential Production of raw material Raw Material 2002 2003 2004

1. Marijuana 2. Coca Leaf 3. Opium gum

C. What is the potential drug production (4)?

Potential production of drug Drug 2002 2003 2004

1. Marijuana 2. Cocaine 3. Heroin

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

Page 75: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Area of Illicit Crops: Does not include areas officially designated as crop areas grown for traditional or medicinal use and/or legal commercial products. Does not include crops grown indoors. Answers should be based on the land area under cultivation during the year and NOT on the number of harvests per year from a given land area. Example: If on a one hectare plot there were four harvests of coca, only count the one hectare-NOT the four harvests. (2) 1 hectare = 2.47 acres

(3) Potential production of raw material: This refers to the entire marijuana plant including the stalk, leaves, seeds and buds, to the yield of dry coca leaves and opium gum that can be obtained from the given area. For the purpose of these calculations, use a standard average determined by the country providing the information. Calculations should be based on the following criteria:

The value of factors such as: planting density, average weight per plant, etc., is to be defined by the reporting country for use in the following calculations and should be reported in the observations’ section. One method of calculation for marijuana, coca leaves and opium gum is the following: The potential production of marijuana is calculated as follows: Total area cultivated with marijuana plants (in hectares) multiplied by the average number of plants per hectare, multiplied by the average weight per plant, multiplied by the number of harvests per year.

POTENTIAL PRODUCTION OF MARIJUANA:

PPm = A x P x Wm x H

PPm = Potential production of marijuana per year A = Total area in hectares P = Average number of plants per hectare Wm = Average weight per plant H = Number of harvests per year

Unit of measure: Kg/ha The potential production of coca leaf is calculated as follows: Total area cultivated with coca leaf (in hectares) multiplied by the average number of plants per hectare, multiplied by the average weight per plant, multiplied

by the number of harvests per year.

POTENTIAL PRODUCTION OF COCA LEAF:

PPc = A x P x Wc x H

PPc = Potential production of coca leaf per year A = Total area in hectares P = Number of plants per hectare Wc = Average weight of dry coca leaf per plant

H = Number of harvests per year

Unit of measure: Kg/ha

Page 76: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

The potential production of opium gum is calculated as follows: Total area cultivated with poppy (in hectares), multiplied by the average yield of opium gum per hectare, multiplied by the number of harvests per year.

POTENTIAL PRODUCTION OF OPIUM GUM

PPo = A x Y x H

PPo = Potential production of opium gum per year A = Total area in hectares of poppy Y = Average yield of opium gum per hectare (Kg) H = Number of harvests per year

Unit of measure: Kg/ha

(4) Potential drug production: This refers to the production of drugs obtained by dividing the number of leaves/plants needed to prepare cocaine hydrochloride or heroin, respectively, based on the estimate of the output of raw material. For marijuana, it refers to the useable parts of the plant such as the leaves and buds.

Page 77: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

24 Number of indoor-grown plants seized, and their potential to produce raw material

DRUG PRODUCTION AND ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Reduction of Illicit Crops / Production

A. How many marijuana plants grown indoors (1) were seized (2) during the past three years?

Number of plants Total weight of raw material (3) Plant

2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004

Marijuana

B. Estimate the amount of indoor production in your country during the past three years?

Estimated production 2002 2003 2004

C. How is indoor cultivation estimated?

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

Page 78: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Plants grown indoors refers to the illicit cultivation of plants indoors, buildings, garages and houses. This refers to marijuana cultivation since it is almost impossible to cultivate coca leaf or poppy indoors. (2) Seized plants refers to illicit plants cultivated indoors, seized by police or other agency authorized to participate in operations against indoor cultivation.

(3) To calculate the total weight of raw material the net weight of the entire plant including the stalk, leaves, seeds and buds should be used.

Page 79: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

25 Areas no longer used for illicit crops (by type of plant) as a result of eradication or abandonment

DRUG PRODUCTION AND ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Reduction of Illicit Crops / Production

A. What was the total area of illicit crops eradicated (1) or abandoned (2) in hectares (3) during the

last three years? Please answer using hectares as the unit of measure.

Areas no longer cultivated. 2002

PLANTS Manual Eradication

Abandoned Fumigated

Forced Voluntary Total

1. Marijuana 2. Coca 3. Poppy

Areas no longer cultivated. 2003

PLANTS Manual Eradication

Abandoned Fumigated

Forced Voluntary Total

1. Marijuana 2. Coca 3. Poppy

Areas no longer cultivated. 2004

PLANTS Manual Eradication

Abandoned Fumigated

Forced Voluntary Total

1. Marijuana 2. Coca 3. Poppy

B. What was the total estimated cost to your country to carry out eradication activities during the

last three years?

Total estimate cost of eradicated areas

Manual Eradication

YEAR Fumigated

Forced Voluntary Total

1 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

Page 80: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

E. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Total area eradicated: This is the net area of crops destroyed. It is understood that different means can be used to reduce cultivation, based on policies and national programs. This can include manual eradication, fumigation or voluntary eradication agreements. (2) Abandonment refers to the act of voluntarily giving up or discontinuing the cultivation of illicit crops. (3) 1 Hectare = 2.47 acres.

Page 81: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

26 Variation of illicit crops, by type of plant and by year

DRUG PRODUCTION AND ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Extent of Illicit Crops / Production

A. What was the variation (1) of illicit crops by type of plant and by year? Please answer using

hectares (2) as the unit of measure.

New illicit crops (area) (3)

PLANTS 2002 2003 2004

1. Marijuana

2. Coca

3. Poppy

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

D. Official providing information:

Page 82: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Variation: This refers to the hectares of illicit crops not included on the list of illicit crops in the last MEM report. Does not include areas where the crop is used for traditional or medicinal purposes and/or legal commercial products. (2) 1 hectare = 2.47 acres.

(3) In order to estimate the variation of illicit crops, the following equation can be used: FORMULA: HN = A1 – A0 HN = Hectares of new crops during the year A0 = Area cultivated at year end A1 = Area cultivated at beginning of year - = denotes subtraction

Page 83: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

27 Existence of alternative development programs (by type)

DRUG PRODUCTION AND ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Existence of Alternative Development Programs to Provide New and Legal Production Opportunities

A. 1. Does your country have alternative development (1) programs?

Y N

a. Alternative development

b. Integral development (2)

2. If the answer is “no”, please proceed to Observations or indicator number 29. 3. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate the type of program:

Type of program Alternative Development Integral Development

a. Agricultural b. Agro-industrial c. Fisheries (Aquaculture) d. Forestry e. Industrial f. Livestock g. Other (specify)

B. How many alternative development or integral development projects were in operation during

the past three years?

Number of projects 2002 2003 2004

Page 84: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. What is the value of the projects currently in force (3)?

Value of the projects

Resources 2002 2003 2004

1. National 2. Foreign 3. Total

D. List the possible difficulties encountered by your country in the marketing of products derived from alternative development or integral development programs.

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Alternative Development as defined by the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) New York, 1998, is “a process to prevent and eliminate illicit cultivation of plants containing narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances through specifically designed rural development measures in the context of sustained national economic growth and sustainable development efforts in countries taking action against drugs, recognizing the particular socio-cultural characteristics of the target communities and groups, within the framework of a comprehensive and permanent solution to the problem of illicit drugs.”

(2) Integral Development: Refers to projects or programs that incorporate a range of elements such as the production and marketing of alternative development products, improvement of infrastructure, education, community participation, health facilities, government presence to provide civil security, rural credit, environmental conservation, among others. To some degree, these terms may overlap.

(3) Value of projects in operation: This refers to the funds earmarked for alternative development or integral development projects currently in operation.

Page 85: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

28 Impact of alternative development programs

DRUG PRODUCTION AND ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Measure the Impact of Alternative Development Programs

A. What impact on the population did alternative development (1) or similar programs have in your

country during the period under study?

Impact 2002 2003 2004

1. Number of families participating 2. Increase in income per capita 3. Number of farmers participating in alternative development

programs

4. Employment generated in marketing and agro industry 5. Employment generated in activities NOT related to agriculture

Impact by Types of works 2002 2003 2004

6. Basic services (e.g. electricity, potable water, gas) 7. Transportation and Infrastructure 8. Aqueduct or Sewage 9. Schools or Education Centers

10. Hospitals and health centers 11. Rural Credit 12. Others (Specify)

B. 1. Does the government have a mechanism or internal system to evaluate the impact of

alternative development programs and/or projects?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please explain the key elements (2) of the mechanism or system used to evaluate the impact of the programs.

Page 86: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. 1. Are there indications of dissatisfaction with alternative development projects or programs?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please explain.

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Alternative Development as defined by the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) New York, 1998, is “a process to prevent and eliminate illicit cultivation of plants containing narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances through specifically designed rural development measures in the context of sustained national economic growth and sustainable development efforts in countries taking action against drugs, recognizing the particular socio-cultural characteristics of the target communities and groups, within the framework of a comprehensive and permanent solution to the problem of illicit drugs.” (2) Key elements that may be used to design an effective mechanism to evaluate alternative development projects can include the following questions: Does it measure short, medium and long term impact?; Does it analyze the cost-benefit ratio of project resources utilized?; Does it take in consideration the overall time in the development of the project?

Page 87: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

29 Illicit laboratories of organic drugs destroyed and potential production by year

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Reduction of Illicit Drug Production

A. 1. Please indicate if illicit laboratories (1) for organic drugs have been found in your

country.

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate how many illicit organic drug laboratories were destroyed in your country during the past three years by estimated potential annual production capacity (2)?

Number of illicit laboratories destroyed

2002 2003 2004

Illicit Drugs

S M L NK S M L NK S M L NK

a. Coca Paste (3)

b. Cocaine Base (4)

c. Cocaine Hydrochloride (5)

d. Heroin

e. Others (specify) f. Total

S = small M = medium L = large NK = not known

3. Not Applicable

B. Observations:

Page 88: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. Agency providing information:

D. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Laboratories refer to facilities or locations where drugs are produced, manufactured or otherwise prepared (including processing pits). These drugs include organic based substances such as cocaine, heroin, hashish etc. (2) Potential annual production capacity refers to the quantity of illicit drugs that the laboratory could have produced during the course of a year if it had not been seized and destroyed. A relative measure of “small” (S), “medium” (M) and “large” (L) is proposed for defining potential capacity. Where data is not available regarding the relative size of a laboratory that is destroyed, then figures may be presented as “not known” (NK). The thresholds for each of the foregoing designations are as follows:

Drugs Units of measure Small Medium Large

1. Cocaine HCL Kg per year < 100 101 – 1,000 >1,000 2. Heroin Kg per year < 50 51 - 500 > 500

Dosage unit refers to the form in which the drug might be contained for consumption such as a tablet, pill, capsule and blotter. (3) Coca Paste: This is produced from coca leaves which have been dissolved with kerosene and sulfuric acid (so as to extract the alkaloid of the cocaine) and sodium carbonate (to extract any impurities which the process may have produced). This is generally known as coca paste. (4) Cocaine Base: This is the equivalent of washed coca paste and is the drug produced from the coca paste which has been put through the process of oxidation through potassium permanganate, as well as sulfuric acid, so as to dissolve substances and impurities. (5) Cocaine Hydrochloride: This is the drug produced from the washed coca paste, which has been put through a dissolving and crystallizing process through the use of acetone and hydrochloric acid.

Page 89: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

30 Illicit laboratories of synthetic drugs destroyed and potential production by year

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Reduction of Illicit Drug Production

A. 1. Please indicate if illicit laboratories (1) for synthetic drugs have been found in your

country.

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate how many illicit synthetic drug laboratories were destroyed in your country during the past three years by estimated potential annual production capacity(2)?

Number of illicit laboratories destroyed

2002 2003 2004

Illicit Drugs

S M L NK S M L NK S M L NK

a. LSD

b. MDMA (Ecstasy and its derivatives)

c. Amphetamines

d. GHB

e. Others (specify) f. Total

S = small M = medium L = large NK = not known

3. Not Applicable

Page 90: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. What were the most frequently seized precursors and synthetic drugs in the period 2002-2004?

Type of substance

2002 2003 2004

C. 1. Has the origin of the seized substances been determined?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate the origin of the seized substances.

D. 1. Have the most frequent trafficking routes been determined?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate which routes were used most frequently.

E. Observations:

Page 91: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Laboratories refer to facilities or locations where drugs are produced, manufactured or otherwise prepared (including processing pits). These drugs include synthetic drugs such as amphetamine-like stimulants, methamphetamine and “designer drugs”. (2) Potential annual production capacity refers to the quantities of illicit drugs that the laboratory could have produced during the course of a year if it had not been seized and destroyed. A relative measure of “small” (S), “medium” (M) and “large” (L) is proposed for defining potential capacity. Where data is not available regarding the relative size of a laboratory that is destroyed then figures may be presented as “not known” (NK). The thresholds for each of the foregoing designations are as follows:

Drugs Units of measure Small Medium Large

Synthetic drugs Dosage units per year < 100K 100K – 500K > 500K

Dosage unit refers to the form in which the drug might be contained for consumption such as a tablet, pill, capsule and blotter.

Page 92: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

31

Operational scope of activities of national entity or entities responsible for controlling pharmaceutical products and preventing their diversion

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent Diversion of Pharmaceutical Products

A. Which national organizations have the principal responsibility for controlling exportation,

importation, production and distribution of pharmaceutical products (1) listed in the United Nations Conventions and preventing their diversion?

B. In addition to those listed in the international conventions, which other pharmaceutical products

are controlled in your country?

C. Which pharmaceutical products listed in the international conventions are not controlled in your

country?

Page 93: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Which of the following are included in the scope of responsibilities of those entities identified in

A? 1. Commercial Sector (e.g. import, export, manufacture, distribution and transport)

Y N

a. Import/export control

b. License control (manufacture, distribution)

c. Monitoring distribution

d. Inspection (2)

e. Investigation (3)

f. Regulatory control (4)

g. Administrative sanctions (5)

h. Registry of Licensees (6)

i. Transport control (7)

j.

Other (specify)

Page 94: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2. Health Care sector (e.g. Health professionals, hospitals, private clinics, pharmacies)

Y N

a. License control (distribution)

b.

Monitoring distribution (e.g. purchase and prescribing by health care professionals, purchases by pharmacies and hospitals)

c. Monitoring of prescribing

d. Inspection (2)

e. Investigation (3)

f. Regulatory control (4)

g. Administrative sanctions (5)

h. Registry of Licensees (6) including pharmacies

i.

Other

(specify)

E. 1. Is there a formal, qualitative mechanism (8) in place to evaluate the effectiveness of

these entities?

Y N

a. Commercial Sector

b. Health Care Sector

2. If the answer is “yes”, what qualitative mechanisms or criteria are used to assess the

effectiveness of these entities?

Page 95: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

3. If the answer is “no,” what qualitative evaluation mechanisms or criteria are proposed or being developed to assess the effectiveness of these entities?

F. 1. What major problems or impediments have these national entities encountered in

effectively fulfilling their responsibilities (such as limited resources, poor regulation, insufficient authority)?

2. What measures have been implemented or proposed in order to address these

impediments?

G. Observations:

H. Agency providing information:

I. Official providing information:

Page 96: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Pharmaceutical products are those substances defined in the U.N. Conventions 1961, as amended in 1972, 1971 and 1988 that are legally distributed for medical and scientific use. (2) Inspections include activities such as site visits and audits that are part of a monitoring activity intended to produce compliance with relevant regulations and other administrative controls. (3) Investigations are activities initiated regarding potential diversion or other irregularities identified or suspected. (4) Regulatory Control is a system or set of procedures used to ensure compliance with regulations established to control the use or distribution of pharmaceutical products. (5) Administrative Sanctions are penalties applied to cases of regulatory noncompliance related to the use or distribution of pharmaceutical products. May include restriction on or removal of privileges to buy, sell, use or otherwise transact business with pharmaceutical products. (6) Registry of Licensees includes registries of entities such as pharmacies, hospitals, manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers and others that are licensed or otherwise legally entitled to buy, sell, use, manufacture, distribute, transport or otherwise handle pharmaceutical products. These entities are usually responsible for the implementation of the national system for the control of pharmaceutical products. This system normally includes a registry of companies, import/export licenses, and transport control.

(7) Transport Control is a system or set of procedures used to minimize the diversion of pharmaceutical products being transported by air, road or other means (e.g. from the manufacturer to a distributor or pharmacy). May include special authorizations or permits to ship or otherwise move quantities of pharmaceutical products. (8) Qualitative mechanism refers to processes or measures that serve to assess the effectiveness of an activity by looking at the resultant impacts rather than quantitative measures which consider the level of activity or output (e.g. number of inspections conducted).

Page 97: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

32

Operational scope of activities of national entity or entities responsible for regulating controlled chemical substances and preventing their diversion

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent Diversion of Controlled Chemical Substances used for the Illicit Manufacture of Drugs

A. Which national organizations have the principal responsibility for controlling the exportation,

importation, production and distribution of controlled chemical substances (1) listed in the United Nations Conventions and preventing their diversion?

B. Which controlled chemical substances listed in the United Nations International Conventions

and the CICAD Model Regulations are not controlled in your country?

C. Which controlled chemical substances are regulated in your country?

Page 98: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Which of the following are included in the scope of responsibilities of the foregoing?

Y N

1. Import/export control

2. License control (manufacture, distribution)

3. Monitoring distribution

4. Inspection (2)

5. Investigation (3)

6. Regulatory control (4)

7. Administrative sanctions (5)

8. Registry of Licensees (6)

9. Transport control (7)

10.

Pre-export notifications (8)

11.

Other (specify)

E. 1. Is there a formal, qualitative mechanism (9) in place to evaluate the effectiveness of

these entities?

Y N

Page 99: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2. If the answer is “yes”, which qualitative mechanisms or criteria are used to assess the effectiveness of these entities?

3. If the answer is “no,” which qualitative evaluation mechanisms or criteria are proposed

or are being developed to assess the effectiveness of these entities?

F. 1. What major problems or impediments have these national entities encountered in

effectively fulfilling their responsibilities (such as limited resources, poor regulation, insufficient authority)?

2. What has been implemented or proposed to address these impediments?

G. Observations:

H. Agency providing information:

I. Official providing information:

Page 100: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Controlled Chemical Substances include chemical substances listed in CICAD’s Model Regulations as well as other chemical substances not included in CICAD’s MR but controlled by the reporting country. (2) Inspections include activities such as site visits and audits that are part of a monitoring activity intended to produce compliance with relevant regulations and other administrative controls. (3) Investigations are activities initiated regarding potential diversion or other irregularities identified or suspected. (4) Regulatory Control is a system or set of procedures used to ensure compliance with regulations established to control the use or distribution of controlled chemical substances.

(5) Administrative Sanctions are penalties applied to cases of regulatory noncompliance related to the use or distribution of controlled chemical substances. May include restriction on or removal of privileges to buy, sell, use or otherwise transact business with controlled chemical substances.

(6) Registry of Licensees are registries of business entities such as manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers and others that are licensed or otherwise legally entitled to buy, sell, use, manufacture, distribute, transport or otherwise handle controlled chemical substances. These entities coordinate implementation of the national chemical control system, which may include a registry of companies, import/export licenses, and transport control. (7) Transport Control is a system or set of procedures used to minimize the diversion of controlled chemical substances being transported by air, road or other means (e.g. from the manufacturer to a distributor). May include special authorizations or permits to ship or otherwise move quantities of controlled chemical substances. (8) Pre-export notifications refers to the exchange that takes place between a country proposing to export or re-export controlled chemical substances to another country which is the end recipient of the chemical or through which the chemicals will be transshipped. These notifications are used as a means to confirm the identity of end users of the consignment. They also provide an opportunity to exchange information between agencies responsible for the control of chemicals, to identify potential problem shipments and to provide advance notice of shipments for administrative, investigational and operational purposes. (9) Qualitative mechanisms refer to processes or measures that serve to assess the effectiveness of an activity, looking at the resultant impacts rather than a quantitative measure that considers the level of activity or output (e.g. number of inspections conducted).

Page 101: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

33 Regulation of the use and distribution of pharmaceutical products by health professionals

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent Diversion of Pharmaceutical Products

A. 1. Does your country have in place a mechanism to monitor and regulate the use and

distribution of pharmaceutical products (1) by those health professionals (2) authorized to do so?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, which of the following elements are included in this mechanism?

Y N

a.

Prescription requirement

b.

Special licenses or permits to prescribe certain drugs

c.

Distribution through pharmacies or other authorized outlets

d.

Monitoring distribution or purchases

e.

Monitoring of prescribing

f.

Inspection (3)/investigation(4)

g.

Administrative sanctions (5)

h.

Registry of Licensees(6)

i.

Other (specify)

Page 102: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. 1. Is there a formal mechanism in place to evaluate the effectiveness of this mechanism?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, which of the following criteria are used for this evaluation?

Y N

a.

Number of licenses to practice issued

b.

Number of complaints received regarding unauthorized use, prescribing or distribution of pharmaceutical products

c.

Number of investigations initiated

d.

Number of administrative sanctions applied

e.

Number of inspections initiated

f.

Percentage of inspections resulting in investigations

g.

Percentage of health professionals in regulatory compliance

h.

Other (specify)

Page 103: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

3. Criteria by year:

Criteria 2002 2003 2004 a. Number of licenses to practice issued

b. Number of complaints received regarding professional practice

c. Number of investigations initiated d. Number of administrative sanctions applied e. Number of inspections initiated

f. Percentage of inspections resulting in investigations

g. Percentage of all health professionals in regulatory compliance

1. physicians 2. dentists 3. pharmacists 4. veterinarians 5. nurses

h. Other (specify)

C. What major problems or impediments have these national entities encountered in effectively fulfilling their responsibilities (such as limited resources, poor regulation, insufficient authority)?

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Pharmaceutical products are those substances defined in the U.N. Conventions 1961, as amended in 1972, 1971 and 1988 that are legally distributed for medical and scientific purposes. (2) Health Professionals generally include pharmacists, physicians, dentists, nurses and veterinarians.

Page 104: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

(3) Inspections include activities such as site visits and audits that are part of a monitoring activity intended to ensure compliance with relevant regulations and other administrative controls. (4) Investigations are activities initiated regarding potential diversion, regulatory violations or other irregularities identified or suspected. (5) Administrative Sanctions are penalties applied to cases of regulatory noncompliance related to the use or distribution of pharmaceutical products. May include restriction on or removal of privileges to buy, sell, use or otherwise transact business with pharmaceutical products. (6) Registry of Licensees includes registries of dentists, physicians, veterinarians, pharmacists, and nurses that are licensed or otherwise legally entitled to buy, sell, use, distribute, transport or otherwise handle pharmaceutical products.

Page 105: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

34

National laws and/or regulations for penal, civil and administrative sanctions against the diversion of controlled chemical substances

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent Diversion of Controlled Chemical Substances used for the Illicit Manufacture of Drugs

A. Does your country make provision in national laws and/or regulations for penal, civil and

administrative sanctions against the diversion of controlled chemical substances (1) in accordance with International Conventions?

Penal sanctions

Civil sanctions

Administrative sanctions (2)

Yes No Yes No Yes No

Controlled chemical substances

B. Please indicate the number of times that sanctions were applied during the last three years

under your national laws and/or regulations by type (penal, civil, administrative).

Number of sanctions Controlled chemical substances

2002 2003 2004

1. Penal 2. Civil 3. Administrative

C. What are the possible sanctions (minimum and maximum) that can be applied by type (penal,

civil, administrative)? Please specify the sanctions in terms of jail time or fines in your national currency as appropriate.

Penal

sanctions Civil

sanctions Administrative

sanctions Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum

Controlled chemical

substances

D. Observations:

Page 106: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Controlled chemical substances include chemical substances listed in CICAD’s Model Regulations (MR) as well as other chemical substances not included in CICAD’s MR but controlled by the reporting country. (2) Administrative sanctions refer to penalties applied when violations have been identified by regulatory agencies against individuals, companies or others entitled to conduct business using controlled chemicals. These sanctions may include but not be restricted to, suspension of licenses, restrictions on licenses, limitations on the scope or nature of operations, reprimands, and changes to or restrictions on the activities of company officials as they relate to transactions or activities involving controlled chemicals.

Page 107: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

35

National laws and/or regulations for penal, civil and administrative sanctions against the diversion of pharmaceutical products

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent Diversion of Pharmaceutical Products

A. Does your country make provision in national laws and/or regulations for penal, civil and

administrative sanctions against the diversion of pharmaceutical products (1) ?

Penal sanctions

Civil sanctions

Administrative sanctions (2)

Yes No Yes No Yes No

Pharmaceutical products

B. Please indicate the number of times that sanctions were applied during the last three years

under your national laws and/or regulations by type (penal, civil, administrative).

Number of sanctions

Pharmaceutical products

2002 2003 2004

1. Penal 2. Civil 3. Administrative

C. What are the possible sanctions (minimum and maximum) that can be applied by type (penal,

civil, administrative)? Please specify the sanctions in terms of jail time or fines in national currency as appropriate.

Penal

sanctions Civil

sanctions Administrative

sanctions Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum

Pharmaceutical products

D. Observations:

Page 108: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Pharmaceutical products are those substances defined in the U.N. Conventions 1961, as amended in 1972, 1971 and 1988 that are legally distributed for medical and scientific purposes. (2) Administrative sanctions refer to penalties applied when violations have been identified by regulatory agencies against individuals; companies or others entitled to conduct business using controlled chemicals. These sanctions may include but not be restricted to, suspension of licenses, restrictions on licenses, limitations on the scope or nature of operations, reprimands, and changes to or restrictions on the activities of company officials as they relate to transactions or activities involving pharmaceutical products.

Page 109: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

36

Number of pre-export (re-exportation) notifications for controlled chemical substances, by year, sent by the Competent Authority of the exporting or transit country

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent Diversion of Controlled Chemical Substances used for the Illicit Manufacture of Drugs

A. How many pre-export notifications (1) for controlled chemical substances (2) did your country

issue during the past three years to countries importing or transshipping these chemicals?

Number of Pre-export Notifications Issued Importing / In-

transit Countries 2002 2003 2004

Total

B. What number of the pre-export notifications sent by your country in the last three years were

rejected by importing or transit countries?

Number of Pre-export Notifications Rejected by Importing or Transit Countries 2002 2003 2004

C. What benefits have you experienced through your use of pre-export notifications?

Page 110: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Indicate the number of problems that you may have encountered when sending a pre-export notification to a transit or importing country.

Number of Times Problem Occurred

Problems Encountered

2002 2003 2004

Y N

1. No response

2. Late response

3.

Request for additional information

4. Rejection/ refusal

5.

Other

(specify)

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Page 111: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Pre-export notifications refers to the exchange that takes place between a country proposing to export or re-export controlled chemical substances to another country which is the end recipient of the chemical or through which the chemicals will be transshipped. These notifications are used as a means to confirm the identity of end users of the consignment. They also provide an opportunity to exchange information between agencies responsible for the control of chemicals, to identify potential problem shipments and to provide advance notice of shipments for administrative, investigational and operational purposes. (2) Controlled chemical substances includes chemical substances listed in CICAD’s Model Regulations as well as other chemical substances not included in CICAD’s MR but controlled by the reporting country.

Page 112: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

37

Pre-export notifications for controlled chemical substances replied to on time by your country relative to the number of pre-export notifications received, by year

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent Diversion of Controlled Chemical Substances used for the Illicit Manufacture of Drugs

A. How many pre-export notifications (1) for controlled chemical substances (2) did your country

receive in the last three years and what number did you respond to in a timely manner?

2002 2003 2004

1. Number of pre-export notifications received by your country

2. Number of timely replies sent by your country (maximum of 15 days)

3. Number of timely replies received in relation to the total number of notifications received

B. What number of responses to pre-export notifications received by your country from exporting

countries in the last three years did you reject or resulted in an investigation in your country?

2002 2003 2004

1. Number of pre-export notifications rejected by your country

2. Number of investigations initiated by your country

C. What benefits have you experienced through your use of pre-export notifications?

Page 113: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Indicate the problems that you may have encountered when attempting to respond to pre-

export notifications received by your country from exporting countries:

Number of Times Problem Occurred

Problems Encountered

2002 2003 2004

Y N

1.

Insufficient time to respond before scheduled shipping

2. Insufficient information

3. Incorrect information

4.

Other (specify)

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Pre-export notifications refers to the exchange that takes place between a country proposing to export or re-export controlled chemical substances to another country which is the end recipient of the chemical or through which the chemicals will be transshipped. These notifications are used as a means to confirm the identity of end users of the consignment. They also provide an opportunity to exchange information between agencies responsible for the control of chemicals, to identify potential problem shipments and to provide advance notice of shipments for administrative, investigational and operational purposes.

Page 114: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

(2) Controlled Chemical Substances include chemical substances listed in CICAD’s Model Regulations as well as other chemical substances not included in CICAD’s MR but controlled by the reporting country.

Page 115: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

38

Pharmaceutical products seized, by number and quantities, and disposed of by substance, quantity and by year

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent Diversion of Pharmaceutical Products

A. How many seizures(1) involving pharmaceutical products(2) were made during the past three

years and what volumes/quantities did this involve?

Number of seizures

Quantities seized

Pharmaceutical Products

(name) 2002 2003 2004

Unit of

measure 2002 2003 2004

1. Oxycodone 2. Hydrocodone 3. Hydromorphone 4. Pentazocine 5. Codeine 6. Propoxyphene 7. Meperidine 8. Methylphenidate 9. Dextroamphetamine

10. Diazepam 11. Oxazepam 12. Flurazepam 13. Alprazolam 14. Estazolam

15. Others (specify)

Total

Page 116: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. Which seized pharmaceutical products were disposed of (3) during the past three years and what volumes/quantities did this involve?

Quantities disposed of

Pharmaceutical products (name)

Unit of measure

2002 2003 2004

1. Oxycodone 2. Hydrocodone 3. Hydromorphone 4. Pentazocine 5. Codeine 6. Propoxyphene 7. Meperidine 8. Methylphenidate 9. Dextroaphetamine

10. Diazepam 11. Oxazepam 12. Flurazepam 13. Alprazolam 14. Estazolam

15. Others (specify)

Total

C. Which of the following methods are routinely used to dispose of seized pharmaceutical products?

Y N

1. Dilution

2. Dissolving

3. Neutralization(4)

4. Incineration

5. Sale

6.

Other

(specify)

Page 117: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. What do you plan to do with seized pharmaceutical products that did not receive final

disposition?

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Seizure means temporarily prohibiting the transfer, conversion, disposition or movement of property or temporarily assuming custody or control of property. (2) Pharmaceutical products are those substances defined in the U.N. Conventions 1961, as amended in 1972, 1971 and 1988 that are legally distributed for medical and scientific purposes. (3) Disposed of includes sale (where permitted) and destruction or otherwise rendering unusable (eg. dilution, neutralization, incineration). The authority to dispose of these pharmaceutical substances and the circumstances under which this can be done are usually defined by legislation or regulations. In most cases, this requires a formal act of a competent legal authority. (4) Neutralization refers to a process that changes the chemical composition or nature of a pharmaceutical substance, rendering it useless for diversion and abuse.

Page 118: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

39

Controlled chemical substances seized, by number and quantities, and disposed of by substance, by quantity and by year

DRUG SUPPLY AND CONTROL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS/ CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent Diversion of Controlled Chemical Substances used for the Illicit Manufacture of Drugs

A. How many seizures (1) involving controlled chemical substances (2) were made during the past

three years and what volumes/quantities did this involve?

Number of seizures

Quantities seized

Controlled chemical substances

(name) 2002 2003 2004

Unit of

measure 2002 2003 2004

Total

B. Which seized controlled chemical substances were disposed(3) of during the past three years

and what volumes/quantities did this involve?

Quantities disposed of

Controlled chemical substances

(name)

Unit of measure

2002 2003 2004

Total

Page 119: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. Which of the following methods are routinely used to dispose of seized controlled chemical substances?

Y N

1. Dilution

2. Dissolving

3. Neutralization (4)

4. Incineration

5. Sale

6.

Other

(specify)

D. What do you plan to do with seized controlled chemical substances that did not receive final

disposition?

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Page 120: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Seizure means temporarily prohibiting the transfer, conversion, disposition or movement of property or temporarily assuming custody or control of property. (2) Controlled Chemical Substances include chemical substances listed in CICAD’s Model Regulations as well as other chemical substances not included in CICAD’s MR but controlled by the reporting country. (3) Disposed of includes sale (where permitted) and destruction or otherwise rendering unusable (eg. dilution, neutralization, incineration). The authority to dispose of these controlled chemical substances and the circumstances under which this can be done are usually defined by legislation or regulations. In most cases, this requires a formal act of a competent legal authority. (4) Neutralization refers to a process that changes the chemical composition or nature of a controlled chemical substance rendering it useless for diversion and use in the production of illicit drugs.

Page 121: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

40

Number of drug seizures by law enforcement agencies and quantities of drugs seized by substance, by measure and by year

ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Stem and/or Eliminate Illicit Drug Trafficking

A. Please cite number of drug seizures (1) by law enforcement agencies over the past three years.

Number of drug seizures

Type of drugs

2002 2003 2004

1. Opium

2. Poppy Plants

3. Poppy Seeds

4. Morphine

5. Heroin

6. Coca Leaf

7. Coca Paste

8. Cocaine Base

9. Cocaine Hydrochloride

10. Crack Cocaine

11. Basuco (residues or impurities)

12. Cannabis plants

13. Leaf Cannabis (grass)

14. Cannabis Resin (hashish)

15. Hashish Oil (liquid cannabis)

16. Cannabis Seed

17. LSD

18. Amphetamine/methamphetamine

19. Other amphetamine-like stimulants (2)

20. MDMA (Ecstasy) and derivatives

21. GHB

22. Methadone

23. Others (specify)

Page 122: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. Please cite quantities of drugs seized by law enforcement agencies over the past three years.

Quantities of drugs seized

Type of drugs

Unit of Measurement 2002 2003 2004

1. Opium

2. Poppy Plants

3. Poppy Seeds

4. Morphine

5. Heroin

6. Coca Leaf

7. Coca Paste

8. Cocaine Base

9. Cocaine Hydrochloride

10. Crack Cocaine

11. Basuco (residues or impurities)

12. Cannabis plants

13. Leaf Cannabis (grass)

14. Cannabis Resin (hashish)

15. Hashish Oil (liquid cannabis)

16. Cannabis Seed

17. LSD

18. Amphetamine/methamphetamine

19. Other amphetamine-like stimulants (2)

20. MDMA (Ecstasy) and derivatives

21. GHB

22. Methadone

23. Others (specify)

Page 123: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. Which of the following methods are routinely used to dispose of (3) seized illicit drugs?

Y N

1. Dilution

2. Dissolving

3. Incineration

4.

Other

(specify)

D. What is done with seized illicit drugs that are not disposed of?

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Page 124: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Seizure means temporarily prohibiting the transfer, conversion, disposition or movement of property or temporarily assuming custody or control of property. (2) Other amphetamine-like stimulants include synthetic drugs subject to abuse with stimulant properties such as enhanced alertness, attention and energy; elevated blood pressure; increased heart rate; increased respiration; suppressed appetite; sleep deprivation. (3) Disposed of includes sale (where permitted) and destruction or otherwise rendering unusable (eg. dilution, neutralization, incineration). The authority to dispose of illicit drugs and the circumstances under which this can be done are usually defined by legislation or regulations. In most cases this requires a formal act of a competent legal authority.

Page 125: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

41 Number of persons arrested, tried and convicted for illicit drug trafficking

ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Stem and/or Eliminate Illicit Drug Trafficking

Only CIVIL LAW countries need reply to this Indicator COMMON LAW countries proceed to Indicator 42 A. During the period 2002- 2004, how many people were arrested in your country for illicit drug

trafficking (1) ?

Number of persons arrested 2002 2003 2004

B. During the period 2002 – 2004, how many people were tried in your country for illicit drug

trafficking ?

Number of persons tried 2002 2003 2004

C. During the period 2002 - 2004, how many people were convicted in your country for illicit drug

trafficking?

Number of persons convicted 2002 2003 2004

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

Page 126: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Illicit drug trafficking is as referred to in Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the 1988 U.N. Convention. Generally speaking this means possession for the purpose of trafficking, cultivation, production (including manufacturing and processing), import/export, distribution and sale. In this indicator the terms “common law” and “civil law” respectively are employed to describe in general terms, the legal systems of the English-speaking countries of the Americas on the one hand and those of the Spanish, Portuguese, French and Dutch-speaking countries of the hemisphere on the other. Generally the legal tradition of the English-speaking countries flows from the laws of England based originally on the common customs of the country, while the legal traditions of the other countries of the hemisphere derive from Roman law overlaid by Napoleonic and German legal influences.

Page 127: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

42 Number of persons charged and convicted for illicit drug trafficking

ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Stem and/or Eliminate Illicit Drug Trafficking

Only COMMON LAW countries need reply to this Indicator CIVIL LAW countries proceed to Indicator 43 A. During the period 2002 - 2004, how many persons were charged for illicit drug trafficking (1) ?

Number of persons charged

2002 2003 2004

B. During the past period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were convicted for illicit drug trafficking ?

Number of persons convicted 2002 2003 2004

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

E. Official providing information:

Page 128: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Illicit drug trafficking is as referred to in Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the 1988 U.N. Convention. Generally speaking this means possession for the purpose of trafficking, cultivation, production (including manufacturing and processing), import/export, distribution and sale.

In this indicator the terms “common law” and “civil law” respectively, are employed to describe in general terms, the legal systems of the English-speaking countries of the Americas on the one hand and those of the Spanish, Portuguese, French and Dutch-speaking countries of the hemisphere on the other. Generally the legal tradition of the English-speaking countries flows from the laws of England based originally on the common customs of the country, while the legal traditions of the other countries of the hemisphere derive from Roman law overlaid by Napoleonic and German legal influences.

Page 129: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

43 Number of persons arrested, tried and convicted for illicit possession of drugs

ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Stem and/or Eliminate Illicit Drug Trafficking

Only CIVIL LAW Countries need reply to this Indicator COMMON LAW countries proceed to Indicator 44 A. During the period 2002 - 2004, how many persons were arrested for illicit drug possession(1) ?

Number of persons arrested 2002 2003 2004

B. During the period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were tried for illicit drug possession?

Number of persons tried 2002 2003 2004

C. During the period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were convicted for illicit drug possession?

Number of persons convicted 2002 2003 2004

D. Does you country have laws or regulations that allow (legally) the possession of drugs for

personal consumption?

Y N

Page 130: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. If the answer is “yes”, indicate which drugs and amounts are allowed.

Drug Category Laws that allow possession for

personal consumption Amount limit

F. Does your country have laws at the provincial, state or local level that establish drug

possession for personal consumption as legal?

Y N

G. If the answer is “yes”, complete the following table:

Drug Category Laws that allow possession for

personal consumption Amount limit

H. What criteria or limits are used to distinguish possession for personal consumption (2) from

possession for the purpose of trafficking?

I. Does your country have national laws or regulations that establish exceptions for the

criminalization of drug possession for personal consumption?

Y N

J. If the answer is “yes”, indicate for which drugs and in what amount is drug possession for

personal consumption not considered a crime, and the measures that are adopted in these cases.

Drug Category Amount limit Measures adopted

Page 131: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

K. Has your country pronounced judicial sentences that allowed drug possession for personal

consumption? (3)

Y N

L. If the answer to K is “yes”, indicate what drugs, amounts, and the number of persons that have

benefited from these judicial sentences.

Drug Category Amount limit Numbers of persons benefited

M. When a person is charged, prosecuted or found guilty of illicit drug possession for personal

consumption, in the place of criminal penalties are there any alternative measures(4) available in your country?

Y N

N. If the answer is “yes”, what types of alternative measures are available?

O. Please indicate the types of alternative measures that have been applied.

Type of measure Number of persons to which the measure was applied

P. In cases where alternative measures have been applied, have the results been evaluated?

Y N

Page 132: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Q. If the answer is “yes”, indicate what methods were used to evaluate the results of the

application of these measures.

R. During period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were arrested for illicit drug possession for

personal use?

Illicit drug possession for personal use Number of persons arrested

2002 2003 2004

S. During period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were tried for illicit drug possession for

personal use?

Illicit drug possession for personal use Number of persons tried

2002 2003 2004

T. During period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were convicted for illicit drug possession for

personal use?

Illicit drug possession for personal use Number of persons convicted

2002 2003 2004

U. Observations:

V. Agency providing information:

Page 133: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

W. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Illicit drug possession refers to possession not related to trafficking. The specific offences are defined by domestic legislation and can include but are not restricted to personal use or consumption. (2) Criteria for possession for personal use includes, for example, the quantity of drugs found on a person. (3) This refers to cases involving possession of illicit drugs, where any of the judgments of the courts have taken into account that the possession is for personal consumption and in consequence have not applied the penalties otherwise required under the law. (4) Alternative Measures are measures applied in place of criminal penalties such as community restitution, drug treatment courts, rehabilitation programs, etc. In this indicator the terms “common law” and “civil law” respectively, are employed to describe in general terms, the legal systems of the English-speaking countries of the Americas on the one hand and those of the Spanish, Portuguese, French and Dutch-speaking countries of the hemisphere on the other. Generally the legal tradition of the English-speaking countries flows from the laws of England based originally on the common customs of the country, while the legal traditions of the other countries of the hemisphere derive from Roman law overlaid by Napoleonic and German legal influences. Illicit drugs refer to those substances contained in paragraphs (n) and (r) of Article 1 of the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988.

Page 134: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

44 Number of persons charged and convicted for illicit possession of drugs

ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Stem and/or Eliminate Illicit Drug Trafficking

Only COMMON LAW countries need reply to this Indicator A. During the period 2002 - 2004, how many persons were charged for illicit drug possession (1)?

Number of persons charged 2002 2003 2004

B. During the period 2002 - 2004, how many persons were convicted for illicit drug possession?

Number of persons convicted 2002 2003 2004

C. Does you country have laws or regulations that allow (legally) the possession of drugs for

personal consumption?

Y N

D. If the answer is “yes”, indicate which drugs and amounts are allowed.

Drug Category Laws that allow possession for

personal consumption Amount limit

E. Does your country have laws at the provincial, state or local level that establish drug

possession for personal consumption as legal?

Y N

Page 135: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. If the answer is “yes”, complete the following table:

Drug Category Laws that allow possession for

personal consumption Amount limit

G. What criteria or limits are used to distinguish possession for personal consumption (2) from

possession for the purpose of trafficking?

H. Does your country have national laws or regulations that establish exceptions for the

criminalization of drug possession for personal consumption?

Y N

I. If the answer is “yes”, indicate for which drugs and in what amount is drug possession for

personal consumption not considered a crime, and the measures that are adopted in these cases.

Drug Category Amount limit Measures adopted

J. Has your country pronounced judicial sentences that allowed drug possession for personal

consumption (3)?

Y N

K. If the answer to J is “yes”, indicate what drugs, amounts, and the number of persons that have

benefited from these judicial sentences.

Drug Category Amount limit Numbers of persons benefited

Page 136: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

L. When a person is charged, prosecuted or found guilty of illicit drug possession for personal consumption, in the place of criminal penalties are there any alternative measures (4) available in your country?

Y N

M. If the answer is “yes”, what types of alternative measures are available?

N. Please indicate the types of alternative measures that have been applied.

Type of measure Number of persons to which the measure was applied

O. In cases where alternative measures have been applied, have the results been evaluated?

Y N

P. If the answer is “yes”, indicate what methods were used to evaluate the results of the

application of these measures.

Q. During the period 2002 - 2004, how many persons were charged for illicit drug possession for

personal use?

Number of persons charged 2002 2003 2004

Page 137: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

R. During the period 2002 - 2004, how many persons were convicted for illicit drug possession for personal use?

Number of persons convicted 2002 2003 2004

S. Observations:

T. Agency providing information:

U. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Illicit drug possession refers to possession not related to trafficking. The specific offences are defined by domestic legislation and can include but are not restricted to personal use or consumption. (2) Criteria for possession for personal use includes, for example, the quantity of drugs found on a person. (3) This refers to cases involving possession of illicit drugs, where any of the judgments of the courts have taken into account that the possession is for personal consumption and in consequence have not applied the penalties otherwise required under the law. (4) Alternative Measures are measures applied in place of criminal penalties such as community restitution, drug treatment courts, rehabilitation programs, etc. In this indicator the terms “common law” and “civil law” respectively, are employed to describe in general terms, the legal systems of the English-speaking countries of the Americas on the one hand and those of the Spanish, Portuguese, French and Dutch-speaking countries of the hemisphere on the other. Generally the legal tradition of the English-speaking countries flows from the laws of England based originally on the common customs of the country, while the legal traditions of the other countries of the hemisphere derive from Roman law overlaid by Napoleonic and German legal influences. Illicit drugs refer to those substances contained in paragraphs (n) and (r) of Article 1 of the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988.

Page 138: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

45

Operational information exchange and collaboration among national authorities with responsibilities for controlling illicit drug trafficking

ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent and Repress Illicit Drug Trafficking

A. By what means do you promote or facilitate operational information exchange and

collaboration among national authorities responsible for controlling illicit drug trafficking?

Y N

1. Interagency committee

2. Joint forces/operations

3. Joint training

4. Interagency information systems/networks (1)

5. Interagency communications systems/networks (2)

6.

Other (specify)

B. Is there a formal mechanism in place to evaluate the effectiveness of these means?

Y N

C. If the answer is “yes”, what mechanisms or criteria are used to assess the effectiveness of these means?

Page 139: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. What major impediments have been encountered in ensuring effective information exchange

and collaboration?

E. What are the principal achievements of the application of this mechanism?

F. What type of information is exchanged, on an international level, by each of the entities

participating in the above-mentioned mechanisms?

G. Observations:

H. Agency providing information:

I. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Interagency information systems/networks refers to computerized or manual information databases to which the agencies have common access. (2) Interagency communications systems/networks refers to a system that links the various agencies and facilitates communication and information exchange among the officials.

Page 140: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

46 Judicial cooperation to investigate and convict drug traffickers

ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent and Repress Illicit Drug Trafficking

A. Indicate the number of judicial cooperation requests regarding illicit drug trafficking made by

your country to other states based on international agreements (1) and the number of replies granting the request.

Number of requests Number of replies granting the

request Country to which the requests were made(2)

2002 (3) 2003 (3) 2004 (3) 2002 2003 2004

B. Indicate the number of judicial cooperation requests regarding illicit drug trafficking received by

your country based on international agreements (1) and the number of replies made granting the request.

Number of requests Number of replies granting the

request Country requesting

judicial cooperation (2)

2002 (3) 2003 (3) 2004 (3) 2002 2003 2004

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

Page 141: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) International agreements include Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), mutual legal assistance treaties, and other bilateral or multilateral cooperation agreements.

(2) Countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, given the concern for confidentiality. (3) Under the years indicated in the table, the number of requests does not necessarily have to match the number of replies. There may be more replies in a given year than requests if they have accumulated from previous years.

Page 142: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

47

Number of extradition requests for illicit drug trafficking made by your country to other States and the number of replies received, in accordance with international agreements

ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent, Control, and Repress Illicit Drug Trafficking

A. Indicate the number of requests for extradition in illicit drug trafficking cases, made by your

country to other states, in accordance with international agreements(1) and the number of replies granting the request.

Number of requests Number of replies granting the

request Country to which the

extradition

requests were made(2) 2002 (3) 2003 (3) 2004 (3) 2002 2003 2004

B. In cases where the request for extradition was granted, on average, from the time the request was made, how long does it take before the person requested is extradited(4) to your country?

Page 143: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. In cases where the request was not granted, please indicate reasons given by the requested

country.

Reasons for not granting (5)

Year

Country to which the extradition

request was made

Error in procedure of the request

Insufficient legal basis

Other (specify)

2002

2003

2004

TOTAL

D. Please identify the central authority responsible for making requests for extradition to other

countries.

E. 1. Have extradition treaties facilitated requests to other countries for extradition in illicit

drug trafficking cases?

Y N

2. Indicate the countries with whom you have extradition treaties:

Countries

Page 144: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. What major impediments have been encountered in requests for extradition in illicit drug trafficking cases to other countries?

G. Observations:

H. Agency providing information:

I. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) International agreements include Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), mutual legal assistance treaties, and other bilateral or multilateral cooperation agreements. (2) Countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, given the concern for confidentiality.

(3) Under the years indicated in the table, the number of requests does not necessarily have to match the number of replies; because of processing delays there may be more replies in a given year than requests if they have accumulated from previous years. (4) Extradition is effective once the person, whose extradition has been requested, has completed the proceedings and is ready to be sent to the petitioning state.

(5) Please provide the number of times for each category.

Page 145: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

48 Number of extradition requests received for illicit drug trafficking, in accordance with international agreements

ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Prevent, Control, and Repress Illicit Drug Trafficking

A. Indicate the number of requests for extradition in illicit drug trafficking cases received by your

country from other states, in accordance with international agreements (1) and the number of replies granting the request.

Number of requests Number of replies granting the

request Country requesting

extradition(2) 2002 (3) 2003 (3) 2004 (3) 2002 2003 2004

B. In cases where the request for extradition was granted, on average, from the time the request was made, how long did it take before the person requested was extradited(4) to the requesting country?

C. In cases where the request was not granted, please indicate the reason.

Reasons for not granting (5) Year

Country requesting

extradition(2) Error in procedure

of the request Insufficient legal basis

Other (specify)

2002

2003

2004

TOTAL

Page 146: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. In cases where the request was not granted, indicate the situation of the person subject to the

extradition request. (6)

Year On trial for the offense specified in extradition

request

Serving sentence in accordance with the offense

specified in extradition request

Serving sentence in accordance with

national legislation

Other (specify)

2002

2003

2004

E. 1. Is extradition of your nationals permitted under national law?

Y N

2. If the answer is “no”, are exceptions permitted for illicit drug trafficking cases or other

transnational crimes?

Y N

F. Do you have a central authority to receive requests for extradition from other states?

Y N

G. Please identify the central authority or other agencies responsible for receiving extradition

requests.

Page 147: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

H. Have extradition treaties facilitated requests received for extradition in illicit drug trafficking cases?

Y N

I. What major impediments have been encountered in receiving requests for extradition in illicit

drug trafficking cases from other countries?

J. Observations(7):

K. Agency providing information:

L. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) International agreements include Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), mutual legal assistance treaties, and other bilateral or multilateral cooperation agreements. (2) Countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, given the concern for confidentiality. (3) Under the years indicated in the table, the number of requests does not necessarily have to match the number of replies; because of processing delays there may be more replies in a given year than requests if they have accumulated from previous years.

(4) Extradition is effective once the person, whose extradition has been requested, has completed the proceedings and is ready to be sent to the petitioning state. (5) Provide the number of instances for each category. (6) Specify case by case, per year

(7) Under observations, other forms of informal cooperation among countries may be noted which lead to extradition.

Page 148: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

49 Criminalization of acts of corruption

CORRUPTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Establish Effective Legal Provisions to Punish Acts of Corruption

A. During the period 2003 – 2004, has your country enacted or amended laws that criminalize, or

define as a minor administrative misdemeanor, acts of corruption in accordance with the Inter-American Convention against Corruption?

Y N Acts of Corruption Criminalized in the

Convention

Title, date and articles of the

national law and/or regulations

Sanction

1.

The solicitation or acceptance of a bribe by a government official (Art. VI a)

2.

The offering or granting of a bribe to a government official (Art. VI b)

3.

Act or omission by a government official for the purpose of illicitly obtaining benefits for himself or for a third party (Art. VI c)

4.

Fraudulent use or concealment of property derived or obtained through corruption (Art. VI d)

5.

Transnational bribery to a government official (Art VIII)

6.

Illicit enrichment of a government official (Art. IX)

7.

Improper use by a government official of confidential information (Art. XI 1a)

8.

Embezzlement by a government official (Art. XI 1b)

Page 149: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

9.

Any act or omission by any person who seeks to illicitly obtain a decision from a public authority, any benefit or gain (Art. XI 1c)

10.

Diversion of assets managed by a government official for his own benefit (Art. XI 1d)

11.

Other (specify)

CIVIL LAW countries answer B, C and D. COMMON LAW countries proceed to questions E and F. B. Please indicate the number of public officials arrested for corruption offenses (1) related to illicit

drug trafficking (2):

Year Number of public officials arrested

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

C. Please indicate the number of public officials tried for corruption offenses related to illicit drug

trafficking:

Year Number of public officials tried

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

D. Please indicate the number of public officials convicted for corruption offenses related to illicit

drug trafficking:

Year Number of public officials convicted

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

Page 150: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

COMMON LAW countries answer questions E and F: E. Please indicate the number of public officials charged for corruption offenses related to illicit

drug trafficking:

Year Number of public officials charged

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

F. Please indicate the number of public officials convicted for corruption offenses related to illicit

drug trafficking:

Year Number of public officials convicted

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

G. Observations:

H. Agency providing information:

I. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Corruption offenses are those identified in Articles VI, VIII, IX, and XI of the Inter-American Convention against Corruption. (2) This indicator refers to public officials who commit a corruption crime related to illicit drug trafficking, for example, judges or law enforcement agents receiving bribes from drug traffickers so as not to arrest or sentence those criminals.

Page 151: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

50 Number of public officials arrested /charged/ tried and convicted for offenses related to illicit drug trafficking

CORRUPTION

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Incidence of Illicit Drug Trafficking Offenses Committed by Public Officials

CIVIL LAW countries answer A, B and C. COMMON LAW countries proceed to questions D and E. A. Please indicate the number of public officials arrested for offenses related to illicit drug

trafficking (1).

Year Number of public officials arrested

1. 2002 2. 2003 3 2004

B. Please indicate the number of public officials tried for offenses related to illicit drug trafficking.

Year Number of public officials tried

1. 2002 2. 2003 3 2004

C. Please indicate the number of public officials convicted for offenses related to illicit drug

trafficking.

Year Number of public officials convicted

1. 2002 2. 2003 3 2004

COMMON LAW countries answer questions D and E: D. Please indicate the number of public officials charged for offenses related to illicit drug

trafficking.

Year Number of public officials charged

1. 2002 2. 2003 3 2004

Page 152: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Please indicate the number of public officials convicted for offenses related to illicit drug

trafficking.

Year Number of public officials convicted

1. 2002 2. 2003 3 2004

F. Observations:

G. Agency providing information:

H. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) This indicator refers to public officials who commit an offense directly related to illicit drug trafficking as defined by national law, for example, those who belong to a drug cartel or drug trafficking organization.

Page 153: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

51

Operational scope of activities of national entities responsible for controlling movement of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials and preventing their diversion

FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

A. Identify the national entity/entities responsible for the following control activities in relation to

firearms(1), ammunition(2), explosives(3) and other related materials(4):

Firearms and Ammunition

Responsibility National Entity

1. Record-keeping

2. Issuance of import (5) and in-transit licenses and authorizations (6)

3. Issuance of export licenses (7)

4. Cancellation of licenses and authorizations

5. Confiscation or forfeiture of illicitly trafficked firearms or ammunition

6. Information exchange within the country among relevant national entities

7. Information exchange with relevant national entities in other countries

8. Training and technical assistance

Explosives

Responsibility National Entity

9. Record-keeping

10. Issuance of import (5) and in-transit licenses and authorizations (6)

11. Issuance of export licenses (7)

12. Cancellation of licenses and authorizations

13. Confiscation or forfeiture of illicitly trafficked explosives

14. Information exchange within the country among relevant national entities

15. Information exchange with relevant national entities in other countries

16. Training and technical assistance

Page 154: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. Which of the following means or mechanisms are used to promote or facilitate information exchange and collaboration among responsible entities (8)?

Y N MEANS/ MECHANISMS OF COOPERATION

1. Interagency committee

2. Joint forces/operations

3. Joint training

4. Interagency information system/networks (9)

5. Interagency communication systems/networks (10)

6.

Other (specify)

C. 1. Is there a formal mechanism that evaluates the effectiveness of national entities in

controlling the movement of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials and in preventing their diversion?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, what mechanisms or criteria are used to assess the effectiveness

of these entities?

D. What major impediments have been encountered in ensuring effective information exchange

and collaboration among responsible national entities?

Page 155: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. What are the principal achievements of the application of this mechanism?

F. What type of information is exchanged by each of the responsible national entities participating

in the above-mentioned mechanisms?

G. Observations:

H. Agency providing information:

I. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (2) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(3) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

(4) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm.

Page 156: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

(5) Import is defined as such in Article 1.3 of the OAS/CICAD Model Regulations for the Control of the International Movement of Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition. (6) In-transit movement occurs whenever a shipment passes through a customs jurisdiction that is neither the country of importation or exportation. (7) Export is defined as such in Article 1.3 of the OAS/CICAD Model Regulations for the Control of the International Movement of Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition. (8) In most instances a mix of ministries, departments or agencies in a country is involved in different aspects of the control of firearms and ammunition. (9) Interagency information systems/networks refers to computerized or manual information databases to which the agencies have common access. (10) Interagency communications systems/networks refers to a system that links the various agencies and facilitates communication and information exchange among officials.

Page 157: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

52

Scope of national laws and/or regulations that criminalize the illicit possession, trafficking and manufacture of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials

FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

A. Provide the titles, dates and relevant articles of current national laws and/or regulations that

criminalize the illicit possession, trafficking(1) and manufacture of firearms(2), ammunition(3) , explosives(4) and other related materials(5) and the sanctions for non-compliance.

Titles, dates and relevant articles of current laws and/or regulations that criminalize the illicit

possession, trafficking and manufacture of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials

Sanction (6)

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

D. Official providing information:

Page 158: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Illicit trafficking of firearms and ammunition includes (a) the introduction into the country of firearms and/or ammunition in violation of the laws that regulate their importation, exportation or in-transit and (b) illegal commercial transactions within the country. In accordance with the legal framework of each country, this can be a special offense or included in other offenses such as smuggling. Illicit trafficking also takes its meaning from Article 1 of the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials. (2) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (3) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(4) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

(5) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm.

(6) Sanction refers to the length of sentence for the offenses of the illicit trafficking of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials. Please indicate whether or not there are provisions for additional sanctions, such as a fine.

Page 159: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

53

Number of persons arrested/charged/ tried and convicted for illicit possession and trafficking of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials

FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

CIVIL LAW countries answer questions A, B and C. COMMON LAW countries proceed to questions D and E: A. During the period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were arrested in your country for illicit

possession and trafficking(1) of firearms(2), ammunition(3), explosives(4) and other related materials(5)?

Illicit Possession and Trafficking of Firearms and Ammunition

Number of persons arrested 2002 2003 2004

Illicit Possession and Trafficking of Explosives Number of persons arrested

2002 2003 2004

B. During the period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were tried for illicit possession and

trafficking of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials?

Illicit Possession and Trafficking of Firearms and Ammunition Number of persons tried

2002 2003 2004

Illicit Possession and Trafficking of Explosives Number of persons tried

2002 2003 2004

Page 160: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. During the period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were convicted of illicit possession and

trafficking of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials?

Illicit Possession and Trafficking of Firearms and Ammunition Number of persons convicted

2002 2003 2004

Illicit Possession and Trafficking of Explosives Number of persons convicted

2002 2003 2004

COMMON LAW countries answer questions D and E: D. During the period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were charged in your country for illicit

possession and trafficking of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials?

Illicit Possession and Trafficking of Firearms and Ammunition Number of persons charged

2002 2003 2004

Illicit Possession and Trafficking of Explosives Number of persons charged

2002 2003 2004

E. During the period 2002 – 2004, how many persons were convicted of illicit possession and

trafficking of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials?

Illicit Possession and Trafficking of Firearms and Ammunition Number of persons convicted

2002 2003 2004

Illicit Possession and Trafficking of Explosives Number of persons convicted

2002 2003 2004

Page 161: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. Observations:

G. Agency providing information:

H. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Illicit trafficking of firearms and ammunition includes (a) the introduction into the country of firearms and/or ammunition in violation of the laws that regulate their importation, exportation or in-transit and (b) illegal commercial transactions within the country. In accordance with the legal framework of each country, this can be a special offense or included in other offenses such as smuggling. Illicit trafficking also takes its meaning from Article 1 of the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials. (2) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (3) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(4) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

(5) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm.

In this indicator the terms "common law" and "civil law" respectively, are employed to describe in general terms, the legal systems of the English-speaking countries of the Americas on the one hand and those of the Spanish, Portuguese, French and Dutch-speaking countries of the hemisphere on the other. Generally the legal tradition of the English-speaking countries flows from the laws of England based originally on the common customs of the country, while the legal traditions of the other countries of the hemisphere derive from Roman law overlaid by Napoleonic and German legal influences.

Page 162: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Page 163: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

54

Scope of laws and/or regulations that establish administrative controls to prevent the diversion of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials

FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

A. Provide the titles, dates and relevant articles of current laws and/or regulations that establish

administrative controls over the importation, exportation and in-transit movement of firearms(1), ammunition(2), explosives(3) and other related materials(4); and the number and type of sanctions (5) in cases of non-compliance. Please annex the text of the relevant articles.

Firearms and Ammunition

Operation under administrative control

Title, dates and articles of current

laws and/or regulations

Type of sanction for non-

compliance

Number of sanctions for the

period 2002 – 2004

Y N

1.

Importation (6)

2.

Exportation

3.

In-Transit (7)

Explosives

Operation under administrative control

Title, dates and articles of current

laws and/or regulations

Type of sanction for non-

compliance

Number of sanctions for the

period 2002 – 2004

Y N

4.

Importation

5.

Exportation

6.

In-Transit

Page 164: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

D. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (2) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(3) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

(4) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm.

(5) Type of sanction refers to a fine, suspension of license, etc. (6) The terms export and import take their meaning from Article 1.3 of the OAS/CICAD Model Regulations for the Control of the International Movement of Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition. (7) An in-transit movement occurs whenever a shipment passes through a customs jurisdiction that is neither the exporting nor the importing country.

Page 165: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

55

For the country of import or in-transit, operation of national laws and/or regulations that require, before authorizing the entry of shipments of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials into your country, that the necessary import or in-transit licenses or authorizations have first been issued

FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

A. Please provide the titles, dates and relevant articles of current national laws and/or regulations

that require that your country issue the corresponding import (1) or in-transit (2) licenses or authorizations before permitting the entry of a shipment of firearms(3), ammunition(4), explosives(5) and other related materials(6). Please annex the text of the relevant articles.

Titles, dates and relevant articles

B. Please provide the number of times a shipment of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other

related materials was not authorized for entry because the necessary import licenses or authorizations were not issued, in the period 2002 – 2004.

Year

Firearms shipment

Ammunition shipment

Explosives shipment

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

C. Please provide the total quantities of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related

materials that were not authorized for entry due to the lack of a necessary import or in-transit license or authorization in the period 2002 – 2004.

Year Quantities of firearms Quantities of ammunition Quantities of explosives

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

Page 166: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) The term importation takes its meaning from Article 1.3 of the OAS/CICAD Model Regulations for the Control of Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition. (2) An in-transit movement occurs whenever a shipment passes through a customs jurisdiction that is neither the exporting nor importing country. (3) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (4) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(5) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials. (6) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm.

Page 167: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

56

For the country of export, operation of national laws and/or regulations that require, before issuing the export license or authorization, that the importing country has first issued the necessary licenses or authorizations

FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

A. Please provide the titles, dates and relevant articles of current national laws and/or regulations

that require that before your country issues an export (1) license or authorization for shipments of firearms(2), ammunition(3), explosives(4) and other related materials(5) the importing country has first issued the necessary licenses or authorizations. Please annex the text of the relevant articles.

Titles, dates and relevant articles

B. Please provide the number of times an export license or authorization was not issued by your

country because the necessary licenses or authorizations were not first issued by the importing country during the period 2002 – 2004.

Year Firearms Ammunition Explosives

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

Page 168: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) The terms export and import takes their meaning from Article 1.3 of the OAS/CICAD Model Regulations for the Control of Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition. (2) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (3) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(4) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

(5) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm.

Page 169: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

57

For the country of export, operation of national laws and/or regulations that require, before authorizing the export of shipments of firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials, that the in-transit countries have issued the necessary licenses or authorizations(1).

FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

A. Please provide the titles, dates and relevant articles of current national laws and/or regulations

that require that, before your country authorizes embarkation of shipments of firearms(2), ammunition(3), explosives(4) and other related materials(5) the in-transit (6) country has first issued the necessary licenses or authorizations. Please annex the text of the relevant articles.

Titles, dates and relevant articles

B. Please provide the number of times a shipment of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other

related materials was not authorized to be exported(7) by your country because the necessary licenses or authorizations were not first issued by the in-transit country, during the period 2002 – 2004.

Year Firearms Ammunition Explosives

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

C. Please indicate the total quantities of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related

materials not permitted to be exported by your country due to the lack of necessary licenses or authorizations from an in-transit country during the period 2002 – 2004.

Year

Quantities of firearms

Quantities of ammunition

Quantities of explosives

Responsible institution

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

Page 170: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Countries which have ratified any regional or international instrument that creates the obligation identified in this indicator or that have a similar obligation under national law, should be in a position to fully respond to this indicator. Other countries are encouraged to respond to the fullest extent possible or make an appropriate observation in the comments section. (2) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (3) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(4) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

(5) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm. (6) An in-transit movement occurs whenever a shipment passes through a customs jurisdiction that is neither the exporting nor importing country. (7) The term export takes its meaning from Article 1.3 of the OAS/CICAD Model Regulations for the Control of Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition.

Page 171: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

58 Quantity of illicitly trafficked firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials confiscated

FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

A. Quantities of illicitly trafficked (1) firearms(2), ammunition(3), explosives(4) and other related

materials(5) confiscated (6) during the period 2002 – 2004.

Quantity of firearms confiscated 2002 2003 2004 Total

Quantity of ammunition confiscated 2002 2003 2004 Total

Quantity of explosives confiscated 2002 2003 2004 Total

B. Does your national law require, in accordance with the Inter-American Convention Against the

Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials, (7) that firearms be marked?

Y N

1. At the time of manufacture

2. For their importation

3. When officially used after confiscation or forfeiture

Page 172: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. 1. Please indicate number of firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials

confiscated in relation to arrests for illicit drug trafficking offenses (8).

Year

Number of arrests

Quantity of confiscated

firearms

Quantity of confiscated ammunition

Quantity of confiscated explosives

Number of operations

a. 2002 b. 2003 c. 2004

2. If there are no registers kept, please indicate if in investigations of confiscated firearms,

ammunition, explosives and other related materials, it is possible to estimate, in percentage terms, how many of them were destined for illicit drug trafficking organizations?

Y N

3. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate in the following table:

Destined for illicit drug trafficking organizations

Year Percentage of

firearms Percentage of ammunition

Percentage of explosives

a. 2002 b. 2003 c. 2004

D. Please indicate the measures or mechanisms in place to prevent the return of confiscated

firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials to the illicit trade.

Y N

1. Destruction

2. Donation to a governmental agency

3. Sale to a governmental agency

4.

Others

(specify)

Page 173: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Illicit trafficking of firearms includes (a) the introduction into the country firearms and/or ammunition in violation of the laws that regulate their importation, exportation or in-transit and (b) illegal commercial transactions within the country. In accordance with the legal framework of each country, this can be a special offense or included in other offenses such as smuggling. Illicit trafficking also takes its meaning from Article 1 of the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials. (2) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (3) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(4) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

(5) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm. (6) Following the language from the Vienna Conventions: “Confiscation”, which includes forfeiture where applicable, means the permanent deprivation of property by order of a court or other competent authority. (7) Article 6(1) of the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

Page 174: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

(8) Illicit drug trafficking means the offenses identified in Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988.

Page 175: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

59

Organization of a national database or record keeping system that maintains a record by dates, description and serial or lot numbers of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials imported, exported or moving in-transit

FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

A. Is there a national database or record keeping system that maintains a record (by date,

description and serial or lot number) of the importation, exportation (1) and in-transit (2) of firearms(3), ammunition (4), explosives (5) and other related materials(6)?

Firearms Ammunition Explosives

Transaction Yes No Yes No Yes No

1. Importation 2. Exportation 3. In-Transit

B. Provide the number of years the records are kept.

Transaction Firearms Ammunition Explosives

1. Importation 2. Exportation 3. In-Transit

C. Are these records computerized?

Firearms Ammunition Explosives

Transaction Yes No Yes No Yes No

1. Importation 2. Exportation 3. In-Transit

D. Observations:

Page 176: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Importation and exportation take their meaning from Article 1.3 of the OAS/CICAD Model Regulations for the Control of Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition. (2) In-Transit movements occur whenever a shipment passes through a customs jurisdiction that is neither the exporting nor importing country. (3) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (4) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(5) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

(6) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm.

Page 177: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

60

Operational scope of activities of entities responsible for information exchange and collaboration between countries, in relation to the control of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials.

FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

A. Identify the national entity or entities responsible for the exchange of information and

collaboration with agencies in other countries regarding the control of firearms(1), ammunition(2), explosives(3) and other related materials(4) and the type of information shared.

National Entity or Entities Type of information shared

B. If there is more than one national entity responsible for controlling the exchange of information

and collaboration with similar agencies in other countries, which of the following means or mechanisms are used to promote or facilitate information exchange and collaboration among the national entities (5)?

Y N Means/Mechanisms of Cooperation

1. Interagency committee

2. Joint forces/operations

3. Joint training

4. Interagency information systems/networks (6)

5. Interagency communication systems/networks(7)

6.

Other (specify)

Page 178: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. Identify by name the aforementioned means or mechanisms of cooperation to promote or

facilitate information exchange and collaboration with similar agencies in other countries and indicate under whose authority they operate.

Name Authority

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (2) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(3) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

Page 179: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

(4) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm.

(5) In many instances a mix of ministries, departments or agencies in a country are involved in different aspects of the control of firearms and ammunition. (6) Interagency information systems/networks refers to computerized or manual information databases to which the agencies have common access. (7) Interagency communications systems/networks refers to a system that links the various agencies and facilitates communication and information exchange among the officials.

Page 180: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

61

Number of requests made to other states to obtain information in relation to shipments of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials and replies received, taking into account international agreements

FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other related materials

A. Please indicate the number of requests for information concerning shipments of firearms(1),

ammunition(2), explosives(3) and other related materials(4) made by your country to other states, in accordance with international agreements(5) and the number of replies providing the information requested.

1.

Firearms

Number of requests Number of replies providing the

information requested Country from which

information was requested (6) 2002 (7) 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004

2.

Ammunition

Number of requests Number of replies providing the

information requested Country from which

information was requested (6) 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004

3.

Explosives

Number of requests Number of replies providing the

information requested Country from which

information was requested (6) 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004

Page 181: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. In cases where the request was not granted, please indicate the reason.

Reasons for not responding(8)

Year Country to which

request was made(6)

Error in procedure

of the request

Insufficient legal basis

Lack of records in requested

country

Other (specify)

2002 2003 2004

TOTAL

C. When information was received, please indicate if it was possible to identify the route (9) and

the source (10) of the firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials. 1.

Firearms

Year Shipment identified

Yes No

Source identified

Yes No

Quantity of firearms seized

Shipping routes identified

2002 2003 2004

TOTAL

2.

Ammunition

Shipment identified

Source identified Year

Yes No Yes No

Quantity of ammunition

seized Shipping routes identified

2002

2003 2004

TOTAL

3.

Explosives

Shipment identified

Source identified Year

Yes No Yes No

Quantity of explosives

seized Shipping routes identified

2002

2003 2004

TOTAL

Page 182: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. What major impediments have been encountered in ensuring effective information exchange and collaboration?

E. What have been the principal achievements?

F. Observations:

G. Agency providing information:

H. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (2) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(3) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

Page 183: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

(4) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm.

(5) International agreements include, among others, Memoranda of Understanding, Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties, and others including cooperation agreements, whether bilateral or multilateral. (6) The countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, given the concern for confidentiality. (7) For the years referred to in the table, numbers of replies and requests made may not necessarily coincide owing to backlogs in the processing of requests. This could yield figures indicating more replies during a year than requests made because the replies in question could include those made to requests made in prior years. (8) Please provide the number of instances for each category. (9) Route refers to the movement of the firearms, ammunition, explosives or other related materials from the point of export, import and in-transit, when applicable. Indicate the name of the corresponding port of export, import and in transit (for example, Hamburg / London / Vigo). (10) Source refers to the locale of production or assembly of firearms and not the port of export.

Page 184: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

62

Number of requests received to obtain information in relation to shipments of firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials taking into account international agreements

FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR Prevention of Diversion of Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and other Related Materials

A. Indicate the number of requests for information concerning shipments of firearms(1),

ammunition(2), explosives(3), and other related materials(4) received by your country from other states in accordance with international agreements (5) and number of replies providing the information requested. 1.

Firearms

Number of requests received Number of replies providing the

information requested Country requesting

information (6) 2002 (7) 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004

2.

Ammunition

Number of requests received Number of replies providing the

information requested Country requesting

information(6) 2002(7) 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004

3.

Explosives

Number of requests received Number of replies providing the

information requested Country requesting

information(6) 2002(7) 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004

Page 185: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. In cases where the request was not granted, please indicate the reason.

Reasons for not granting (8)

Year Country

requesting (6) information

Error in procedure

of the request

Insufficient legal basis

Lack of records in requested

country

Other (specify)

2002

2003

2004

TOTAL

C. What major impediments have been encountered in ensuring effective information exchange

and collaboration?

D. What have been the principal achievements?

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Page 186: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Firearms: a)- any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the

action of an explosive, except antique firearms manufactured before the 20th Century or their replicas; or b)- any other weapon or destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket

launcher, missile, missile system, or mine. (2) Ammunition: the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.

(3) Explosives: any substance or article that is made, manufactured, or used to produce an explosion, detonation, or propulsive or pyrotechnic effect, except: a)- substances and articles that are not in and of themselves explosive; or b)- substances and articles listed in the Annex to the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials.

(4) Other related materials: any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm, or an accessory which can be attached to a firearm.

(5) International agreements include, among others, Memoranda of Understanding, Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties, and others including cooperation agreements, whether bilateral or multilateral. (6) The countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, given the concern for confidentiality.

(7) Under the years indicated in the table, the number of replies and requests does not necessarily have to match the number of replies. There may be more replies in a given year than requests, if they have accumulated from previous years. (8) Please provide the number of instances for each category.

Page 187: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

63 Scope of national laws that criminalize money laundering

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Establish Effective Penal Regulations to Repress Money Laundering

A. Provide the titles, dates and relevant articles of current national laws that criminalize money laundering (1) and the sanctions for non-compliance.

Titles, dates and relevant articles of current national laws that criminalize money laundering

Penalty(2)

Page 188: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. Please provide information in the table below:

Y N Predicate offense (3)

1. Illicit drug trafficking

2. Traffic of firearms

3. Traffic of human beings

4. Organ trafficking

5. Prostitution

6. Pornography

7. Kidnapping

8. Extortion

9. Corruption

10.

Terrorism and its financing

11.

Fraud

12.

Other (specify)

C. If a person has been convicted for a predicate offense, is it possible to initiate a trial for money laundering ?

Y N

Page 189: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Does your law require that a person be convicted for a predicate offence in order to obtain evidence that certain goods are proceeds of such a crime and subsequently convict a person for money laundering those proceeds?

Y N

E. Observations:

F. Agency providing information:

G. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Money laundering refers to the offense described in Article 2 of the CICAD/OAS Model Regulations Concerning Laundering Offenses Connected to Illicit Drug Trafficking and other serious Offenses, amended in 1999. (2) Penalty refers to the number of years imposed for money laundering offenses. Please indicate whether or not there are provisions for additional sanctions, such as a fine equivalent to the amount laundered or the permanent deprivation of the property. (3) Predicate offenses are those crimes which produce the assets involved in money laundering offenses.

Page 190: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

64 Scope of national laws that authorize special investigations on money laundering

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Establish Laws on Special Investigations to Repress Money Laundering

A. Please indicate the existence of national laws that authorize the following actions in order to

combat money laundering:

Y N Action

1. Undercover investigations (1)

2. Electronic Surveillance (2)

3. Use of informants (3)

4. Controlled deliveries (4)

5. Sentence reduction for cooperating witnesses (5)

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

D. Official providing information:

Page 191: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Undercover investigations are those that authorize law enforcement agents assuming fictitious identities to infiltrate criminal organizations in order to obtain evidence or other information relating to violations of one or more criminal laws. They may include employment of a ruse or deception - the provision of useful data to commit an offence - but shall not encourage suspects to commit crimes that they are not predisposed to commit.

(2) Electronic surveillance is the interception or monitoring of wire, oral or electronic communications. The interception is the acquisition of the content of any communication; the monitoring is carried out by using a recording device.

(3) Use of informants is the authorization given to a person in order to furnish reliable information related to money laundering. The informant may be a person subject to arrest and prosecution or a defendant in a pending case that, under the specific direction of a law enforcement agent, furnishes information regarding money laundering. In such a case the informant is a “defendant-informant”.

(4) Controlled delivery is the technique of allowing illicit or suspect consignments to pass through, into or out of, the territory of one or more countries with the knowledge and under the supervision of their competent authorities with the objective of investigating and identifying persons involved in money laundering cases.

(5) Sentence reduction for cooperating witnesses is when a person convicted, in order to obtain a reduction on his/her sentence, cooperates with the government by providing precise information or data that sheds light on the commission of a crime.

Page 192: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

65 Scope of national laws that establish administrative controls to prevent money laundering

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Establish Effective Control Regulations to Repress Money Laundering

A. Please indicate which activities have administrative controls (1) to prevent money laundering:

Y N Regulated Sector Title and articles of the law

1. Banks (2)

2. Offshore banks (3)

3. Currency exchanges

4. Stock exchange

5. Insurance

6. Casinos

7. Real estate

8. Lawyers

9. Notaries

10.

Accountants

11.

Cross border movements of currency & negotiable bearer instruments

12.

Other (specify)

Page 193: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. Please indicate the sanctions(4) applicable under question A.

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

E. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Administrative controls refer to laws, decrees, or other administrative measures issued by a regulatory agency, regulating each of the sectors indicated. (2) Banks are financial intermediation institutions including, in this case, savings and loans associations and other such institutions. (3) Offshore banks are exempt from many controls imposed on “local” or “national” banks, since they are legal persons of other countries, under the special system of the country in which they are located. (4) Sanctions refer to fines, suspension of licenses, etc.

Page 194: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

66 Number of persons arrested/charged/ tried and convicted for money laundering

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Assess the Effectiveness of the Police and Judicial System for cases of Money Laundering

CIVIL LAW countries answer questions A, B and C. COMMON LAW countries proceed to question D: A. During the past three years, how many persons were arrested in your country for money

laundering (1)?

Number of persons arrested 2002 2003 2004

B. During the past three years, how many persons were tried for money laundering?

Number of persons tried 2002 2003 2004

C. During the past three years, how many persons were convicted of money laundering?

Number of persons convicted 2002 2003 2004

COMMON LAW countries answer questions D and E: D. During the past three years, how many persons were charged in your country for money

laundering?

Number of persons charged 2002 2003 2004

Page 195: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. During the past three years, how many persons were convicted of money laundering?

Number of persons convicted 2002 2003 2004

F. Observations:

G. Agency providing information:

H. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Money laundering refers to the offense described in Article 2 of the CICAD/OAS Model Regulations Concerning Laundering Offenses Connected to Illicit Drug Trafficking and other serious Offenses, as amended in 1999. In this indicator the terms "common law" and "civil law" respectively, are employed to describe in general terms, the legal systems of the English-speaking countries of the Americas on the one hand and those of the Spanish, Portuguese, French and Dutch-speaking countries of the hemisphere on the other. Generally the legal tradition of the English-speaking countries flows from the laws of England based originally on the common customs of the country, while the legal traditions of the other countries of the hemisphere derive from Roman law overlaid by Napoleonic and German legal influences.

Page 196: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

67

Scope of national laws and regulations requiring financial institutions and others responsible to report suspicious or unusual transactions to the competent authorities and to comply with other control measures

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Establish Effective Administrative Controls to Repress Money Laundering

A. In your country, is it mandatory for financial institutions and others responsible to report

suspicious (1) or unusual transactions to the competent authorities?

Y N

B. In your country, is there a law that exempts financial institutions and others responsible from

liability for reporting suspicious transactions in accordance with the obligating law?

Y N

Page 197: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. In your country, is it mandatory for financial institutions and others responsible to comply with or have in place the following control measures (2)?

Y N Control measures

1. Reporting large transactions(3)

2. Client registry

3. Verification of client identity

4. Transaction registry

5. Preservation of records

6. Existence of an enforcement official

7. Existence of independent audits

8. Know-your-client policies

9. Know-your-employee policies

10.

Prohibition of anonymous accounts

11.

Other (specify)

D. Observations:

Page 198: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Suspicious transactions are transactions, whether completed or not, that are complex, unusual, of high value or that do not follow a regular pattern or small, but periodic transactions that have no apparent economic or lawful purpose.

(2) Control measures are measures to prevent money laundering in the financial system emanating from several international instruments. The proposed examples are from the CICAD Model Regulations and the 40 recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (3) Large transactions as defined by domestic law.

Page 199: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

68 Number of suspicious transactions reports and their outcome

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of the Reporting System for Suspicious Transactions for Cases of Money Laundering

A. How many suspicious transactions (1) were reported to the competent

authorities?

Year Number of suspicious transactions reported

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

B. Based on the number of reports indicated above in question A,

how many investigations(2) were conducted?

Year Number of investigations conducted

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

C. Based on the investigations conducted, how many criminal charges were brought?

Year Number of criminal charges brought

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

D. Of the criminal charges referred to in question C, how many resulted in convictions?

Year Number of convictions

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

Page 200: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Of the criminal charges referred to in question C, what was the

value of assets forfeited (3)?

Year Value (4) of assets forfeited

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

F. If the aforementioned questions could not be answered due to the nature of the office which

receives the data, 1. Is there a system that tracks suspicious transaction (5) reports and their outcome?

Y N

2. Is there a method to evaluate the effectiveness of the system on suspicious transactions reporting?

Y N

3. If the answer is “yes”, how do you evaluate the effectiveness?

G. Observations:

H. Agency providing information:

I. Official providing information:

Page 201: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Suspicious transactions are transactions, whether completed or not, that are complex, unusual, of high value or that do not follow a regular pattern or small, but periodic transactions that have no apparent economic or lawful purpose. (2) Investigations are inquiries made by an investigation unit either on its own initiative or under the authority/request of the judiciary bodies, with the aim to determine the penal character of the suspicious transactions detected. (3) Forfeiture – following the language from the 1988 Vienna Convention: “Confiscation”, which includes forfeiture where applicable, means the permanent deprivation of property by order of a court or other competent authority. (4) Please indicate the value in national currency. (5) Tracks suspicious transactions means a follow up system to determine the positive results of suspicious transaction reports at each link of the chain of actors involved in the fight against money laundering (Financial Intelligence Units, Police, Prosecutors and Judges).

Page 202: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

69

Number of sanctions imposed on financial institutions and others responsible for failure to report suspicious transactions or to comply with other money laundering control measures

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine Effectiveness of the Administrative and Judicial System for Cases of Money Laundering

A. How many sanctions were imposed on financial institutions and others responsible (1) for failure

to report suspicious transactions(2)?

Administrative(3) Judicial (4)

Year Number of

sanctions applied Minimum sanction applied

Maximum sanction applied

Minimum sanction applied

Maximum sanction applied

1. 2002

2. 2003

3. 2004

B. How many sanctions were imposed on financial institutions and others responsible for failure

to comply with money laundering control measures (other than for failure to report suspicious transactions)?

Administrative Judicial

Year

Number of

sanctions applied Minimum sanction applied

Maximum sanction applied

Minimum sanction applied

Maximum sanction applied

1. 2002

2. 2003

3. 2004

C. Observations:

Page 203: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Agency providing information:

E. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Others responsible are companies or enterprises subject to money laundering prevention controls. According to the CICAD Model Regulations, this includes offshore banks, currency exchanges, stock exchanges, insurance companies, casinos, real estate companies, notaries, accountants, etc. (2) Suspicious transactions are transactions, whether completed or not, that are complex,

unusual, of high value or that do not follow a regular pattern or small, but periodic transactions that have no apparent

economic or lawful purpose. (3) Administrative sanctions are those imposed by regulatory agencies in the financial system and sectors in which money laundering is controlled, including the Superintendency of banks, securities and insurance; the central bank; the Financial Analysis Unit; etc., in accordance with domestic law. (4) Judicial sanctions are those imposed by a court.

Page 204: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

70 Option of lifting bank secrecy (1)

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To facilitate the control and sanctioning of money laundering offenses

A. 1. In your country, can bank documents and/or financial records be provided in money

laundering cases?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, can these documents be requested in accordance with the

existing law?

Y

a.

For Financial Intelligence

b.

For Indictment

3. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate the number of money laundering cases in which bank documents and/or financial records were provided:

Year Number of money laundering cases

Number of requests for bank or other financial institution documents

Number of cases in which bank documents and financial records

were provided

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

B. On average, how long did it take to lift the bank secrecy and obtain documents and financial

records from the time the request was made until the lifting took place?

Page 205: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. In cases in which bank documents and financial records were not provided, please indicate why (2).

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Bank Secrecy is, in accordance with national law, the confidentiality imposed to financial institutions on their client’s data. (2) Justification could include existing legal barriers, lack of sufficient evidence, etc.

Page 206: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

71 Value of property forfeited in cases related to money laundering

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of the Confiscation System for Cases of Money Laundering

A. What is the total value (1) of property forfeited (2) in money laundering cases?

Year Value of property forfeited

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

B. What was the ultimate disposition (3) of this property or the proceeds from its sale?

Year Disposition of property forfeited

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

C. 1. Does your law authorize sharing forfeited goods in cases involving more than one

country?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please indicate in the following table the value of the forfeited

goods.

Year Value of forfeited goods

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

D. Observations:

Page 207: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Please indicate the value in national currency. (2) Forfeiture – following the language from the Vienna Convention 1988 - “confiscation”, which includes forfeiture where applicable, means the permanent deprivation of property by order of a court or other competent authority. (3) Disposition of property refers to the institutions that benefited from its use or from the proceeds of its sale. Such institutions are charities, Financial Intelligence Units (FIU’s) or similar, demand reduction programs, judicial authorities, and general accounts.

Page 208: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

72

Operation of an entity for the management and/or disposition of assets seized and forfeited from illicit drug trafficking and money laundering

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of the Confiscation System for Cases of Money Laundering

A. 1. In your country, is there an entity for the management and/or disposition of assets (1)

seized (2) and forfeited (3) for illicit drug trafficking and money laundering offenses?

Y N

a. One entity for illicit drug trafficking

b. One entity for money laundering offenses

c. One entity for both

2. If the answer is “yes”, please specify:

Y N Name

Does it have its own budget?

3. Please indicate if the entity has manuals for the management of assets seized.

Y N

4. If it is under the authority of another state agency (4) , please indicate which one.

Page 209: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

5. Please indicate the value (5) of the property managed in the period 2002-2004:

Year Value of property managed

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

D. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Assets refer to proceeds of illicit drug trafficking and money laundering and can include movable property, real estate, cash, securities, etc. (2) Seizure means temporarily prohibiting the transfer, conversion, disposition or movement of property or temporarily assuming custody or control of property . (3) Forfeiture - following the language from the Vienna Convention 1988 - “confiscation”, which includes forfeiture where applicable, is the permanent deprivation of property by order of a court or other competent authority. (4) Other state agency can be a ministry, the office of the attorney general, the judiciary, the Superintendency of banks, etc. (5) Please indicate the value in national currency.

Page 210: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

73

Existence and operation of a Financial Intelligence/Analysis/Investigation Unit that receives, requests, analyzes and reports to the competent authorities information on transactions that may constitute money laundering

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of the System on Prevention and Control of Money laundering

A. 1. In your country, is there a Financial Intelligence/Analysis/Investigation Unit (FIU) (1) that

receives, requests, analyzes and reports to the competent authorities information on transactions that may constitute money laundering?

Y N

If the answer is “no”, please go to indicator 76.

2. If the answer is “yes”, please specify:

Y N Name Number of officials

Budget amount

Does it have its own budget?

3. Is the Unit autonomous (2)?

Y N

4. If it is under the authority of another state agency (3), please indicate which one.

Page 211: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

5. Please indicate the functions of the Unit.

Y N

a.

Conducts analysis and reports findings

b.

Investigates

c.

Regulates

d.

Sanctions

e.

Receives and Communicates

f.

Other (specify)

6. Please indicate if the analysis agency has direct access to bank information:

Y

a.

Can directly consult bank accounts

b.

Should go through the Board of Directors of the bank

c.

Should go through a prosecutor or judge

d.

Should request information from a centralized financial agency. If this is the case, please specify which one?

_______________________________

7. What information or documents related to financial matters may the Unit request?

Page 212: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

8. Please indicate the agencies with which it shares information.

Y N

a. Other state agencies

b. Its foreign counterparts

B. Observations:

C. Agency providing information:

D. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) A Financial Intelligence/Analysis/Investigation Unit (FIU/FAU) may assume one of the following models, as determined by the Egmont Group, depending on where the agency is situated in the governmental structure of a country: (a) a police model; (b) a judicial model; (c) a mixed police/judicial model; or (d) an administrative model. (2) Autonomy means that FIUs decisions are primarily of a technical nature. (3) Other state agency can be a ministry, the Office of the Attorney General, the judiciary, the Superintendency of Banks, etc.

Page 213: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

74

Implementation and operating level of the Financial Intelligence/Analysis/Investigation Unit that receives, requests, analyzes and reports to the competent authorities information on transactions that may constitute money laundering

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of the System on Prevention and Control of Money Laundering

A. Please indicate the number of financial disclosures/reports/cases analyzed/investigated by the

Unit.

Year Number of financial disclosures/reports/cases analyzed/investigated

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

B. For Financial Intelligence Units that conduct analysis and investigations: 1. Based on the analysis/investigations conducted, how many criminal charges were

brought?

Year Number of charges brought

a. 2002 b. 2003 c. 2004

2. In the abovementioned penal cases, how many persons were convicted?

Year Number of persons convicted

a. 2002 b. 2003 c. 2004

3. In the penal cases mentioned in question B.1, please indicate the value of any assets forfeited (1)?

Year Value (2) of assets forfeited

a. 2002 b. 2003 c. 2004

Page 214: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

C. For Financial Intelligence Units that solely analyze and report findings: 1. Is there a system that tracks the results of these reports?

Y N

2. Is there a method to evaluate the effectiveness of analysis on financial

disclosures/reports/cases?

Y N

3. If the answer is “yes”, how do you evaluate the effectiveness?

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Forfeiture - following the language from the Vienna Convention 1988 - “confiscation”, which includes forfeiture where applicable, means the permanent deprivation of property by order of a court or other competent authority. (2) Please indicate the value in national currency.

Page 215: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

75

Implementation and operating level of the Financial Intelligence/Analysis/Investigation Unit at the international level

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of the Prevention and Control System of Money Laundering

A. Please indicate if the Financial Intelligence Unit (1) is a member of the Egmont Group.

Y N

B. Please list the countries with which your Financial Intelligence Unit has signed Memoranda of

Understanding (MOUs) allowing for the exchange of information with its counterparts in other countries:

Name of country

C. Does your law authorize your Financial Intelligence Unit to share information with a counterpart

in other countries without the need of signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)?

Y N

D. Observations:

E. Agency providing information:

Page 216: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

F. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) A Financial Intelligence/Analysis/Investigation Unit (FIU/FAU) may assume one of the following models depending on where the agency is situated in the governmental structure of a country: (a) a police model; (b) a judicial model; (c) a mixed police/judicial model; or (d) an administrative model.

Page 217: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

76

Number of extradition requests for money laundering made by your country to other states and the number of replies received, in accordance with international agreements

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of International Cooperation to Prevent Money Laundering

A. Please indicate the number of requests for extradition in money laundering cases made by

your country to other states, in accordance with international agreements (1) and the number of replies granting the request.

Number of requests Number of replies granting the

request Country to which the

extradition requests were made (2) 2002 (3) 2003 (3) 2004 (3) 2002 2003 2004

B. In cases where the request for extradition is granted, on average, from the time the request

was made, how long does it take before the person subject of the request is extradited (4) to your country?

C. In cases where the request was not granted, please indicate reasons given by the requested

country.

Reasons for not granting (5)

Year

Country to which the extradition

request was made

Error in the procedure of the

request

Insufficient legal basis

Other (Specify)

2002

2003

2004

TOTAL

Page 218: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Please indicate if money laundering, in all cases, is an extraditable offense in your country?

E. Is there a central authority responsible for making requests for extradition to other countries?

Y N

F. Please identify the Central Authority or other agencies responsible for making requests for

extradition to other countries.

G. Do the provisions in extradition treaties facilitate requests to other countries for extradition in

money laundering cases?

Y N

H. What major impediments have been encountered in requests for extradition in money

laundering cases to other countries?

I. Observations:

J. Agency providing information:

Page 219: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

K. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) International agreements include memoranda of understanding (MOUs), mutual legal assistance treaties, and other bilateral or multilateral cooperation agreements.

(2) The countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, due to confidentiality. (3) Under the years indicated in the table, the number of requests does not necessarily have to match the number of replies. There may be more replies in a given year than requested, if they have accumulated from previous years.

(4) Extradition is effective once the person, whose extradition has been requested, has completed the proceedings and is ready to be sent to the petitioning State. (5) Please provide the number of instances for each category

Page 220: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

77

Number of extradition requests received by your country for money laundering, in accordance with international agreements

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of International Cooperation to Prevent Money Laundering

A. Please indicate the number of requests for extradition in money laundering cases received by

your country from other states, in accordance with international agreements (1) and the number of replies granting the request.

Number of requests Number of replies granting the

request Country requesting

extradition(2)

2002 (3) 2003 (3) 2004 (3) 2002 2003 2004

B. In cases where the request for extradition was granted, on average, from the time the request was made, how long did it take before the person requested was extradited(4) to the requesting country?

C. In cases where the request was not granted, please indicate the reason.

Reasons for not granting (5)

Year Country

requesting extradition (2)

Error in procedure of the request

Insufficient legal basis

Other (specify)

2002

2003

2004

TOTAL

Page 221: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. In cases where the request was not granted, indicate the situation of the person subject to the extradition request (6).

Year On trial for the offense specified in extradition

request

Serving sentence in accordance with the offense

specified in extradition request

Serving sentence in accordance with

national legislation

Other (specify)

2002

2003

2004

E. 1. Is extradition of your nationals permitted under national law?

Y N

2. If the answer is “no”, are exceptions permitted for money laundering cases or other

transnational crimes?

Y N

F. Do you have a central authority to receive requests for extradition from other states?

Y N

G. Please identify the central authority or other agencies responsible for receiving extradition

requests.

Page 222: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

H. Have extradition treaties facilitated requests received for extradition in money laundering

cases?

Y N

I. What major impediments have been encountered in receiving requests for extradition in money

laundering cases from other countries?

J. Observations(7):

K. Agency providing information:

L. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) International agreements include Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), mutual legal assistance treaties, and other bilateral or multilateral cooperation agreements. (2) Countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, given the concern for confidentiality. (3) Under the years indicated in the table, the number of requests does not necessarily have to match the number of replies. There may be more replies in a given year than requests, if they have accumulated from previous years. (4) Extradition is effective once the person, whose extradition has been requested, has completed the proceedings and is ready to be sent to the petitioning State.

(5) Please provide the number of instances for each category. (6) Specify case by case, per year

(7) Under observations, other forms of informal cooperation among countries may be noted that lead to extradition.

Page 223: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

78

Number of requests made to other states to freeze assets in money laundering cases and the number of replies received, in accordance with international agreements

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of International Cooperation to Prevent Money Laundering

A. Please indicate the number of requests to freeze (1) assets in money laundering cases made by

your country to other states, in accordance with international agreements(2) and the number replies granting the request.

Number of requests Number of replies granting the

request Country asked to freeze

assets (3)

2002 (4) 2003 (4) 2004 (4) 2002 2003 2004

B. In cases where the request was granted, from the time the request was made, on average how

long did it take before the assets were frozen?

C. In cases where the request was not granted, please indicate reasons given by the requested

country:

Reasons for not granting (5)

Year

Country to which the

request was made

Error in procedure of the request

Insufficient legal basis

Other (specify)

2002

2003

2004

TOTAL

Page 224: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. 1. Is there a central authority responsible for making International cooperation requests to

other countries?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please identify the central authority or other agencies responsible for

making international cooperation requests to other countries:

E. Do the provisions in international cooperation treaties facilitate requests to other countries for

freezing assets in money laundering cases?

Y N

F. What major impediments have been encountered in requests to other countries to freeze

assets in money laundering cases?

G. Observations:

H. Agency providing information:

I. Official providing information:

Page 225: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Freezing means temporarily prohibiting the transfer, conversion, disposition or movement of property or temporarily assuming custody or control of property on the basis of an order issued by a court or other competent authority. This concept includes the freezing of bank accounts. (2) International agreements include Memoranda of Understanding (MOU’s), mutual legal assistance treaties and other bilateral or multilateral cooperation agreements.

(3) The countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, due to concern for confidentiality. (4) Under the years indicated in the table, the number of requests does not necessarily have to match the number of replies. There may be more replies in a given year than requests if they have accumulated from previous years. (5) Please provide the number of instances for each category.

Page 226: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

79

Number of requests received to freeze assets in money laundering cases, in accordance with international agreements

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of International Cooperation to Prevent Money Laundering

A. Indicate the number of requests to freeze(1) assets in money laundering cases received by

your country from other states, in accordance with international agreements (2) and the number of replies granting the request.

Number of requests Number of replies granting the

request Country that requested the freezing of assets(3)

2002 (4) 2003 (4) 2004(4) 2002 2003 2004

B. In cases where the request was granted, on average, from the time the request was made,

how long did it take before the assets were frozen (5)?

C. In cases where the request was not granted, please indicate the reason(s).

Reasons for not granting(6) Year

Requesting country (3) Error in procedure

of the request Insufficient legal basis

Other (specify)

2002

2003

2004

TOTAL

Page 227: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. 1. Is there a central authority responsible for receiving international cooperation requests from other countries?

Y N

2. If the answer is “yes”, please identify the central authority or other agencies responsible for

receiving international cooperation requests from other countries.

E. Do the provisions in international cooperation treaties facilitate requests from other countries

for freezing assets in money laundering cases?

Y N

F. What major impediments have been encountered in requests from other countries for

extradition in money laundering cases?

G. Observations:

H. Agency providing information:

I. Official providing information:

Page 228: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Freezing means temporarily prohibiting the transfer, conversion, disposition or movement of property or temporarily assuming custody or control of property on the basis of an order issued by a court or other competent authority. This concept includes the freezing of bank accounts. (2) International agreements include Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), mutual legal assistance treaties and other bilateral or multilateral cooperation agreements. (3) The countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, due to concern for confidentiality. (4) Under the years indicated in the table, the number of requests does not necessarily have to match the number of replies. There may be more replies in a given year than requests, if they have accumulated from previous years. (5) In the case of frozen assets this is considered effective at the moment that the order is issued by the judicial branch, or the competent authority. (6) Please provide the number of instances for each category.

Page 229: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

80

Number of requests made to other States to lift bank secrecy (1) in money laundering cases and the number of replies received, in accordance with international agreements

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of International Cooperation to Prevent Money Laundering

A. Indicate the number of requests for bank documents and/or financial records for use in money

laundering cases made by your country to other states, in accordance with international agreements (2) and the number of replies providing the information requested.

Number of requests Number of replies providing the

information requested Country from which documentation was

requested (3) 2002 (4) 2003 (4) 2004 (4) 2002 2003 2004

B. In cases where the request was granted, on average from the time the request was made, how

long did it take before the bank secrecy was lifted and the documents and financial records obtained?

C. In cases where the request was not granted, please indicate reasons given by the requested

country:

Reasons for not granting (5)

Year

Country to which the

request was made

Error in procedure of the request

Insufficient legal basis

Other

2002

2003

2004

TOTAL

Page 230: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Do the provisions in international cooperation treaties facilitate requests to other countries for lifting the bank secrecy in money laundering cases?

Y N

E. What major impediments have been encountered in requests to other countries for lifting the

bank secrecy in money laundering cases?

F. Observations:

G. Agency providing information:

H. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Bank Secrecy is, in accordance with national law, confidentiality imposed on the financial institutions regarding their client’s data.

(2) International agreements include memoranda of understanding (MOUs), mutual legal assistance treaties, and other bilateral or multilateral cooperation agreements. (3) The countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, due to confidentiality. (4) Under the years indicated in the table, the number of requests does not necessarily have to match the number of replies. There may be more replies in a given year than request, if they have accumulated from previous years. (5) Please provide the number of instances for each category

Page 231: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

81

Number of requests received to lift bank secrecy(1) in money laundering cases, in accordance with international agreements

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Effectiveness of International Cooperation to Prevent Money Laundering

A. Please indicate the number of requests to obtain bank documents and financial records to be

used in money laundering cases, received by your country from other countries, in accordance with international agreements (2) and the number of replies granting the request.

Number of requests Number of replies granting the

request Country requesting that

bank documents be provided (3) 2002 (4) 2003 (4) 2004 (4) 2002 2003 2004

B. In cases where the request was granted, on average from the time the request was made, how

long did it take before the bank secrecy was lifted and the documents and financial records obtained (5)?

C. In cases where the requests were not granted, please indicate the reason (s).

Reasons for not granting (6) Year

Requesting country (3) Error in procedure

of the request Insufficient legal basis

Other (specify)

2002

2003

2004

TOTAL

Page 232: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

D. Do the provisions in international cooperation treaties facilitate requests from other countries for lifting the bank secrecy in money laundering cases?

Y N

E. What major impediments have been encountered in requests from other countries for lifting the

bank secrecy in money laundering cases?

F. Observations:

G. Agency providing information:

H. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Bank Secrecy is, in accordance with national law, confidentiality imposed on financial institutions regarding their client’s data. (2) International agreements include Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), mutual legal assistance treaties and other bilateral or multilateral cooperation agreements. (3) Countries will be listed if permitted by the treaties under which the country responding to the questionnaire is a party or if permitted by its domestic law, due to concern for confidentiality. (4) Under the years indicated in the table, the number of requests does not necessarily have to match the number of replies. There may be more replies in a given year than requests, if they have accumulated from previous years.

Page 233: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

(5) Defines the time when the pertinent judicial authorization has been given by the competent authority in order to present the documents and financial registries to the requesting countries, once there are no pending procedures. (6) Please provide number of instances for each category.

Page 234: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

82 Number of judges and prosecutors trained to enforce criminal laws to repress money laundering

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Quality of Training for Judges and Prosecutors to Administer Money Laundering Cases

A. Please indicate the number of judges and prosecutors who received specialized training (1)

during the period indicated to administer money laundering cases.

Year Judges Prosecutors

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

B. Of those, how many continue to perform the same functions?

Year

Quantity of trained judges and prosecutors that continue to perform the same functions

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

E. Official providing information:

Page 235: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Training refers to courses, seminars, workshops and university degrees that specifically focus on the offense and particular features of money laundering.

Page 236: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

83 Number of administrative officials trained to enforce laws and regulations to control and repress money laundering

MONEY LAUNDERING

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine the Quality of Training for Administrative Officials to Control Money Laundering

A. Please indicate the number of officials from Financial Intelligence Units and other

administrative regulator agencies trained (1) in money laundering during the period indicated.

Year Number of administrative officials (2) trained

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

B. Of the above, how many continue to perform the same functions?

Year

Number of administrative officials trained who continue to perform the same functions

1. 2002 2. 2003 3. 2004

C. Observations:

D. Agency providing information:

E. Official providing information:

Page 237: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Training refers to courses, seminars, workshops and university degrees that focus specifically on the offense and particular features of money laundering. (2) Administrative officials are those persons responsible for the supervision of administrative measures to control money laundering in the financial, securities, real estate, business sectors, etc. Based on the legal system of each country, they may work for the Superintendency of Banks, Securities, and Insurance or Financial Intelligence/Analysis/Investigation Units.

Page 238: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

84 Displacement (1)

DISPLACEMENT

PURPOSE OF

INDICATOR To Determine New Trends in the global phenomenon of the mobility of different manifestations of the drug problem

A. Have you seen and/or identified new trends in the evaluation period 2003 – 2004?

Y N

1. Trafficking/routes

2. Drug abuse

3. Illicit crop cultivation

4. Illicit laboratories

5. Pharmaceutical products

6. Controlled chemical substances

7. Illicit drugs

8. Firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials

9.

Money laundering

10. Other (specify)

Page 239: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

B. Have existing causes and/or factors been identified that facilitate these new tendencies?

Y N

1. Trafficking/routes

2. Drug abuse

3. Illicit crop cultivation

4. Illicit laboratories

5. Seized pharmaceutical products

6. Seized chemical substances

7. Seized illicit drugs

8. Seized firearms, ammunition, explosives and other related materials

9.

Money laundering

C. Have you identified other new trends?

Y N

D. What is the impact of new trends identified by your country?

Page 240: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. What measures have been adopted to counter these trends?

F. Observations:

G. Agency providing information:

H. Official providing information:

Definitions and Explanations

(1) Displacement: “the mobility of different manifestations of the drug problem”, definition agreed upon in the First Meeting of the CICAD Group of Coordinators on Displacement, held in Miami, Florida, on February 14-16, 2001.

Page 241: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM – QUESTIONNAIRE – SECOND EVALUATION ROUND

Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission - CICAD

85 Prevention, control and repression of Transnational

Organized Crime(1) in relation to illicit drug trafficking and related crimes

PURPOSE OF INDICATOR: ESTABLISH THE SCOPE OF EXISTING PREVENTIVE, CONTROL AND REPRESSIVE MEASURES TO CONFRONT TRANSNATIONAL ORGANIZED CRIME IN RELATION TO ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING AND RELATED CRIMES

A. What Legal Mechanisms does your country have in place to combat Transnational Organized Crime?:

Y N

1. National laws

a. If the answer is no, are laws being drafted and what is the status for their eventual adoption?

b. If the answer is yes, please provide the title of the principal law/laws and include examples of

how this legislation has recently been effectively applied.

B. Crimes and cooperative measures that are covered by the National Law(s): 1. Crimes covered by National Law(s):

Y N

a. Participation in an organized criminal group (2)

b. Money laundering c. Corruption d. Obstruction of justice e. Trafficking in persons (3)

Page 242: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

f. Illicit trafficking of migrants g. Illicit manufacture and trafficking of firearms, their parts, components and

ammunition on an international level h. Others if applicable (please describe):

2. Cooperation measures covered by National Law(s):

Y N

a. Extradition

b. Mutual joint legal assistance: cautionary and enforcement measures c. Seizure and confiscation(4) d. Interdiction operations e. Victim protection and assistance f. Other forms of cooperation: If applicable, please explain and describe

what they involve:

C. Special investigation techniques included in the national law:

Y N 1. Undercover operations (5) 2. Telephone line tapping(6) 3. Controlled deliveries (7)

4. Others (if applicable, please describe):

D. Observations:

(Please provide narrative data with any necessary explanatory notes to facilitate a more complete report on the situation in your country which will contribute to the analysis and provide insight on the strengths, areas for development and ways that additional cooperative techniques in the Hemisphere may contribute to the common objectives in combating transnational organized crime.)

Page 243: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

E. Agency (s) coordinating the presentation of information:

F. Principal Official(s) coordinating the input of information for this indicator. Please provide a telephone

number and e-mail address of the person responsible for responding to this indicator.

____________________________________________ DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS: (1) Transnational Organized Crime is carried out by: (2) a structured group of three or more persons, existing for a period of time and acting in concert with the aim of committing one or more serious crimes or offences established in accordance with the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit. (Article 2(a) United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime). The offence is transnational in nature if: a) It is committed in more than one State; b) It is committed in one State but a substantial part of its preparation, planning, direction or control takes

place in another State; c) It is committed in one State, but involves an organized criminal group that engages in more than one

State; or d) It is committed in one State but has substantial effects in another State. (Article 3(2), United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime) (3) "Trafficking in persons" shall mean the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception., of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal pf organs. (Article 3(a) of the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children). (4) Confiscation, which includes forfeiture where applicable, shall mean the permanent deprivation of property by order of a court or other competent authority. (Article 2(g) United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime) (5) Undercover operations are those that authorize law enforcement agents assuming fictitious identities to infiltrate criminal organizations in order to obtain evidence or other information relating to violations of one or more criminal laws. They may include employment of a ruse or deception - the provision of useful data to commit an offence - but shall not encourage suspects to commit crimes that they are not predisposed to commit. (6) Telephone line tapping is gaining access to cable, oral or electronic communications. (7) Controlled delivery shall mean the technique of allowing illicit or suspect consignments to pass out of, through or into the territory of one or more States, with the knowledge and under the supervision of their competent authorities, with a view to the investigation of an offence and the identification of persons involved in the commission of the offence. (Article 2(i) United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime)

Page 244: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM – QUESTIONNAIRE – SECOND EVALUATION ROUND Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission - CICAD

[date]

86 Enforcement of laws against Transnational Organized Crime in relation to illicit drug trafficking and related

crimes

PURPOSE OF INDICATOR: TO ESTABLISH THE EFFECTIVENESS OF HEMISPHERIC LAWS TO PREVENT, CONTROL AND REPRESS TRANSNATIONAL ORGANIZED CRIME IN RELATION TO ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING AND RELATED CRIMES.

A. Name the principal institutions responsible for enforcing laws against transnational organized crime and

their primary functions (e.g., intelligence (1), data banks, investigative and arrest authority, liaison (2) functions with similar agencies in other countries etc.)

1. Agency: 1a. Principal Function: 2. Agency: 2a. Principal Function:

3. Agency: 3a. Principal Function:

(Continue until main agencies are covered) B. Are training programs available for officials responsible for enforcing laws against transnational

organized crime?

Y N

1. If the answer is yes, please describe the main programs, their institutional affiliation and how often

training is offered.

Page 245: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2. If training programs exist, please indicate how many officials and what type of officials received this

training during the period 2002-2004

Number of persons trained 2002 2003 2004

3. If there are no training programs, please describe the most urgent areas needed for training, e.g., basic

police techniques, investigative techniques, instruction in basic law etc. Explain why these training areas represent a priority.

C. Do mechanisms exist to evaluate the efficiency of the main institutions responsible for the prevention,

control and repression of transnational organized crime?

Y N

1. If the answer is yes, please briefly describe the main systems in place for the evaluation of institutional efficiency. Describe the nature of sanctions against institutions or persons, if any, and, if possible, how they have been applied.

D. Are systems in place in the main institutions associated with the prevention, control and repression of

transnational organized crime to ensure that employees are properly screened before hiring and then periodically reviewed to ensure that they are trustworthy and not subject to bribery or extortion (measures to minimize corruption)?

Y N

1. If the answer is yes, please briefly describe the main systems in place to ensure top to bottom employee honesty and to curb bribery and corruption. Describe the nature of sanctions against institutions or persons, if any, and, if possible, how they have been applied.

Page 246: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

2. If the answer is no, please describe any mechanisms being considered in your country to

achieve such goals.

E. If transnational organized crime is criminalized in your country, how many persons were arrested, tried

and convicted for crimes related to transnational organized crime during the period 2002-2004:

Number of persons arrested

2002 2003 2004

2.

Number of persons tried 2002 2003 2004

3.

Number of persons convicted 2002 2003 2003

4.

Observations: Countries whose legislation includes plea bargaining, please indicate this in your response as this would not reflect statistically in the arrest-trial data.

F. When reviewing these statistics, do officials familiar with the problem believe that these statistics

accurately reflect the magnitude of the problem of transnational organized crime in your country? Please explain with analysis that represents the views of experts in the field in your country. This narrative may be included in the section for observations.

G. Please provide information on requests for assistance made and received in relation to transnational organized crime in the period 2002-2004.

Page 247: MULTILATERAL EVALUATION M MECHANISM E M Round... · Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission D. 1. Please

Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism - Questionnaire - Third Evaluation Round Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission

Number of reports received and granted

2002 2003 2004

Received Granted Received Granted Received Granted

2.

Number of reports requested and granted 2002 2003 2004

Requested Granted Requested Granted Requested Granted

H. Observations:

(Please provide narrative data with any necessary explanatory notes to facilitate a more complete report on the situation in your country which will contribute to the analysis and provide insight on the strengths, areas for development and ways that additional cooperative techniques in the Hemisphere may contribute to the common objectives in combating transnational organized crime.)

I. Agency (s) coordinating the presentation of information:

J. Principal Official(s) coordinating the input of information for this indicator. Please provide a telephone

number and e-mail address of the person responsible for responding to this indicator.

_____________________________________ DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS: (1) Intelligence agencies: These are entities whose functions are to look for, collect and evaluate information in a reserved manner, out of the criminal procedure.

(2) Liaison agents: These are persons who carry out communication activities between similar agencies on subjects under their responsibility (for example, exchange of information and intelligence data). Note: The preceding definitions have been added after the CICAD XXXIV meeting in Montreal.