Multi-Year Improvement Final Recommendations Plan for All ...

42
Multi-Year Improvement Plan for All Schools Final Recommendations July 13, 2021 1

Transcript of Multi-Year Improvement Final Recommendations Plan for All ...

Multi-Year Improvement Plan for All Schools

Final RecommendationsJuly 13, 2021

1

Where we left off…

Report

Mar 2020Notice to Proceed

Sept 2020Phase 1

High Schools CIP Recommendations

July 2021 Final

Recommendations

Mar‐20 Apr‐20 May‐20 Jun‐20 Jul‐20 Aug‐20 Sep‐20 Oct‐20 Nov‐20 Dec‐20 Jan‐21 Feb‐21 Mar‐21 Apr‐21 May‐21 Jun‐21 Jul‐21 Aug‐21 Sep‐21

May 2021Facility Options

Mar 2021Phase 2

Assessment Findings

Phase 2: Other FacilitiesPhase 1: High Schools

Fall 2021MYIPAS

Execution Plan & Final

Report

2

Four Special Education and Alternative Education stakeholder workshops. Draft Options shared at 5/27 Community Forum. Countywide Survey with 4800+ responses, all BCPS communities represented. Cost estimates developed. Final Focus Group Summit to inform final recommendations.

Since our last conversation…

Report

Mar 2020Notice to Proceed

Sept 2020Phase 1

High Schools CIP Recommendations

July 2021 Final

Recommendations

Mar‐20 Apr‐20 May‐20 Jun‐20 Jul‐20 Aug‐20 Sep‐20 Oct‐20 Nov‐20 Dec‐20 Jan‐21 Feb‐21 Mar‐21 Apr‐21 May‐21 Jun‐21 Jul‐21 Aug‐21 Sep‐21

May 2021Facility Options

Mar 2021Phase 2

Assessment Findings

Phase 2: Other FacilitiesPhase 1: High Schools

Fall 2021MYIPAS

Execution Plan & Final

Report

3

Purpose

People & Process

Results

Recommendations

Next Steps

4

Purpose

5

Predictable, data-driven roadmap for CIP

Multi-Year Improvement Plan for All Schools

6

Predictable, data-driven roadmap for CIP Maximized State funding

Multi-Year Improvement Plan for All Schools

7

Predictable, data-driven roadmap for CIP Maximized State fundingComprehensive, student-

focused decisions

Multi-Year Improvement Plan for All Schools

8

Predictable, data-driven roadmap for CIP Maximized State fundingComprehensive, student-

focused decisions Inclusive stakeholder and

community engagement

Multi-Year Improvement Plan for All Schools

9

Predictable, data-driven roadmap for CIP Maximized State fundingComprehensive, student-

focused decisions Inclusive stakeholder and

community engagementEquitable allocation of

limited resources

Multi-Year Improvement Plan for All Schools

10

People & Process

11

100+ planning committee members

22planning workshops

70planning options developed

$4+ billion of needs analyzed

170campuses assessed

10,000assessment deficiencies identified

25,000+ stakeholders engaged

3community surveys

12hours of community forums

12

Results

13

Take-away #1: equitable distribution of resources

BCPS MYIPAS Survey, March 2021:

Funding for facilities should be allocated to benefit as many students as possible.

14

Take-away #2: reasonable implementation timeline

BCPS MYIPAS Survey, March 2021:

What is the longest that students should go without a major building renovationin anticipation of a replacement school?

82% prefer 15 years or less

15

Take-away #3: focus on Educational Equity & Capacity

BCPS MYIPAS Survey, March 2021:

Rank these factors for achieving equitable access and opportunity to maximize academic success and social/emotional well-being.

Access to academic opportunities and programs (Educational Adequacy & Equity)

Every student should have a seat inside the building (Capacity)

Safe and supportive environment (Educational Adequacy & Equity)

All aspects of facility in top condition (Facility Condition)

Resources and supports for at-risk student populations (Educational Adequacy & Equity)

Timely repairs to essential building systems (Facility Condition)

Teachers and school staff should have a space inside the building (Capacity)

16

Cost estimates based on facility assessments and industry standard best practices.

All figures stated in 2021 $US for simplicity.o Uniform annual cost escalation factors applied

for balancing long-range CIP budget (10% baseline + 4% annual).

o Average CIP budget increases assumed at equivalent 4% per year.

Square feet per student figures accurately model BCPS’ preferred ed spec design standards (above Maryland funding basis).

Cost estimating

17

Needs outweigh current CIP budgets

Annual CIP$140M ($100M County + $40M State) 

for 15 years + 

Built to Learn Act $40M 

for 10 years

Total of highest cost MYIPAS Draft Options for all planning clusters

18

A hierarchy of priorities

Legacy Projects

Managed Growth

Educational Strategy

Special & Alternative Education

Renovations & Enhancements

Pre-K Early Education

Premium Projects

Incremental costs for higher cost Premium and Educational Strategy Projects

• Schools for Our Future, Lansdowne HS

• Addition/renovation/redistricting

• New programs, grade reconfiguration, consolidation

• New construction & renovations for stand-alone centers

• Prioritized repairs and educational equity improvements

• Blueprint for Maryland’s Future

• Demolition/replacement, redistricting avoidance

19

Closing the budget gap

Extend Time

24-30+ years

More/New Funding

$80M+ / yearmore

private partnerships & alternative funding

Reduce Scope

redistricting vs additions

addition/renovation vs replacement

prioritized renovations

20

Recommendations

21

Multi-Year Improvement Plan for All Schools

MYIPAS Recommendation In budget. ALL schools improved within 15 years. ALL Legacy Projects included. Additions and redistricting to bring capacity

utilization down to 100% by 2026. Select Educational Strategy projects. Special Education & Alternative Education. Prioritized Renovation & Enhancements. Expanded Pre-K contingency plan adds 1-2

years to program timeline. Premium Projects not included.

22

3-5 New Schools (2 Legacy, 1 HS, 1 MS, 1 Special Ed)

5 Replacement Schools (Legacy) 28 Addition/Renovations 132 Renovations 0-3 Repurposed Campuses

(2 grade reconfiguration, 1 swing space school)

Multi-Year Improvement Plan for All Schools

23

Recommended Projects by Area and Assessment Score

Project sequence will be determined by numerous factors, such as: funding cashflow, assessment priority order, educational program impact, sequence logic, project delivery strategy, swing space, etc.

24

Trade-offs

25

4800+ community survey responses confirm broad support for recommended facility options that enable more equitable distribution of capital investments.

Alignment with community preferences

26

Large community survey turnout from Dulaney and Towson 69% of which expressed preference for replacement over renovation.

Alignment with community preferences

27

Stakeholders are closely split on whether to create a new high school or expand existing schools in the northeast.

Alignment with community preferences

28

What’s included…

Legacy Projects

Managed Growth

Educational Strategy

Special & Alternative Education

Renovations & Enhancements

Pre-K Early Education

• Schools for Our Future, Lansdowne HS

• Addition/renovation/redistricting

• New programs, grade reconfiguration, consolidation

• New construction & renovations for stand-alone centers

• Prioritized repairs and educational equity improvements

• Blueprint for Maryland’s Future

29

Legacy Projects ($227M)

Projects for which the County has fully-funded design and/or construction, e.g. Schools for Our Future:

o NE Area ES at Ridge Road New Schoolo Red House Run ES Replacemento Bedford ES Replacemento Summit Park ES Replacemento New NE Area MS New Schoolo Pine Grove MS Addition and Renovationo Deer Park ES Replacemento Scotts Branch ES Addition and Renovationo Lansdowne HS Replacement

30

28 Addition/Renovation Projects

o Pinewood ES, Riderwood ES, & Rodgers Forge ESo Cromwell ES, Lutherville ES & Timonium ESo Fifth District ES, Prettyboy ES, & Seventh District ESo Carroll Manor ESo Dulaney HS, Loch Raven HS, & Towson HSo Gunpowder ESo Owings Mills other NW ES’so Deep Creek ESo Grange ES, Logan ES, & Norwood ESo Dundalk HS & Patapsco HSo Woodbridge ES & Featherbed ES

Managed Growth ($237M)

31

Educational Strategy ($328M)

New NE HS vs Additions o Recommendation: near term land procurement

due-diligence, focused stakeholder outreach, and program and curriculum design

Sparrows Point MS and HS Separationo Recommendation: land procurement due diligence for

new Middle School, focused stakeholder outreach

Program Improvementso Grade reconfiguration, Norwood/Holabird o Magnet expansion, e.g., Cromwell Magneto Career Tech Ed Master Plan and improvements

Consolidation/Repurpose/PPPo Recommendation: study P3 potential for cost-neutral

delivery of replacement/consolidation optionso Arbutus/Halethorpe, Pot Spring/Timonium/Warren,

Golden Ring

32

Special Education & Alternative Education ($71M)

Special Educationo Expressed desire to: • Improve the stand-alone facilities• Distribute programs more broadly

o New White Oak specialized service center • State-of-the-art, purpose-designed facility• White Oak facility renovated for swing space, capacity relief, other

functions

o Recommend:• Prioritized renovations to stand-alone facilities: Maiden Choice, Battle

Monument, Ridge Ruxton• Prioritized renovations/additions/relocations to other schools

Alternative Education o Expressed desire to:• Improve the stand-alone facilities• Improve transition back to home school

o Prioritized renovations/additions/relocations to stand-alone centers: Crossroads Center, Rosedale, Meadowood, Catonsville Center

33

Pre-K Early Education

Blueprint for Maryland’s Future: Required full-day Pre-Kindergarten for children from

disadvantaged households

Additions, space conversions, and/or new stand-alone facilitiesmay be needed

Unknown factors:• Number of qualifying 3- and 4-year-olds• Parental preferences• Private vendor availability • Additional State funding

Preliminary study: Capital cost could equal 1-2 years of typical annual CIP allocation

Recommendation:• Monitor geographical demand, availability of private vendors• Monitor legislative requirements • Advocate for additional State funding • If action is required and no new funding is available, extend

renovations program by 1 or 2 years

34

Renovations & Enhancements ($1.6B)

Physical & Emotional Health

Equity Supports for Vulnerable Students

Career Tech Education (CTE) & STEM

Renovate Open-Plan Classrooms

21st Century flexible learning spaces

ADA Accessibility

Special Education

Educational Program

Relationships & Collaboration

Wellness

Safety & Security

Technology & Furniture

Operational Utility

35

Renovations & Enhancements (Equity Supports)

36

ALL schools, ALL studentsReasonable implementation timeline

Focus on Educational Equity & Capacity

37

Next Steps

38

FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 *

MYIPAS Implementation Timeline

Legacy Projects Managed Growth Educational Strategy

Special & Alternative Education Renovations & Enhancements Pre‐K Expansion

Next steps…

Report

Mar 2020Notice to Proceed

Sept 2020Phase 1

High Schools CIP Recommendations

July 2021 Final

Recommendations

Fall 2021MYIPAS

Execution Plan & Final

Report

Mar‐20 Apr‐20 May‐20 Jun‐20 Jul‐20 Aug‐20 Sep‐20 Oct‐20 Nov‐20 Dec‐20 Jan‐21 Feb‐21 Mar‐21 Apr‐21 May‐21 Jun‐21 Jul‐21 Aug‐21 Sep‐21

May 2021Facility Options

Mar 2021Phase 2

Assessment Findings

Phase 2: Other FacilitiesPhase 1: High Schools

Execution Plan Factors Cashflow Priority sequence from assessments Project delivery strategy and logic Educational initiatives Due-diligence, feasibility studies, project scoping studies

39

Questions

40

Thank you

41

42