Multi-Scale ITG/TEM/ETG Turbulence Simulations with … · Multi-Scale ITG/TEM/ETG Turbulence...
Transcript of Multi-Scale ITG/TEM/ETG Turbulence Simulations with … · Multi-Scale ITG/TEM/ETG Turbulence...
S. Maeyama, Y. Idomura, M. Nakata, M. Yagi, N. Miyato
Japan Atomic Energy Agency
Collaborators: T.-H. Watanabe (Nagoya Univ.), M. Nunami, A. Ishizawa (NIFS)
25th IAEA FEC, 15 Oct. 2014
This work is supported by HPCI Strategic Program Field No. 4 and MEXT KAKENHI Grant No. 26800283.
Multi-Scale ITG/TEM/ETG Turbulence Simulations with Real Mass Ratio and β Value
TH/1-1
Introduction
2
One of the critical issues in ITER is electron heat transport, which is inherently multi-scale physics. 2000 [Jenko00PoP]
A candidate is electron temperature gradient modes (ETG). 2007 [Candy07PPCF,Waltz08PoP,Görler08PRL]
ETGs give small transport if there are ion temperature gradient and trapped electron modes (ITG/TEM). However, these multi-scale simulations were limited:
• Reduced mass ratio (mi/me=400, 900) • Electrostatic approximation (β=0)
Radial direction
Polo
idal
dir
ection
“Streamers” in ETG turbulence
Motivation & Outline
Linear instabilities from electron to ion scales
Poloidal wave number kyρti
Lin
ear
gro
wth
rate
γR/v
ti
Scale separation with real mass ratio
10
1
0.1
0.1 1 10
Ion-scale stabilization with real β
β=0.04% β=2.0%
3
Following points are not yet clarified: (i) Are there multi-scale interactions even with the real mass ratio and β value?
(ii) If yes, how do the interactions occur?
Motivation & Outline Following points are not yet clarified: (i) Are there multi-scale interactions even with the real mass ratio and β value? Multi-scale simulation
demonstrates cross-scale interactions.
(ii) If yes, how do the interactions occur? Nonlinear interaction
analysis reveals their mechanisms.
Linear instabilities from electron to ion scales
Poloidal wave number kyρti
Lin
ear
gro
wth
rate
γR/v
ti
Scale separation with real mass ratio
10
1
0.1
0.1 1 10
Ion-scale stabilization with real β
β=0.04% β=2.0%
3
5
2.5
0
-2.5
-5
The GKV code [Watanabe06NF,Maeyama13CPC]
• Solve gyrokinetic ions and electrons with electromagnetic fluctuations in a flux-tube geometry.
• Validation with experiments. [Posters:Nakata,Ishizawa,Nunami]
• High scalability allows ITG/TEM/ETG simulations with ~100k CPU cores in ~100 hours. [Maeyama13SC]
ITG/TEM
ETG
Plasma parameters are Cyclone base case parameters [Dimits00PoP]
• R/LTi=R/LTe=6.82, R/Ln=2.2, Te=Ti, r/R=0.18, q=1.4, s=0.786
• Real mass ratio: mi/me=1836
• Real β value: β=2.0% (below NZT [Pueschel13PRL])
4
Multi-scale turbulence simulation(β=2.0%)
Time evolution of the electrostatic potential fluctuations (at mid-plane of the flux tube)
5
Fie
ld e
ne
rgy W
k R
2/(
n0T
iρti2)
Time t vti/R
102
101
1
10-1
10-2
10-3
0 20 40 60 80
Zonal (kyρti=0)
ITG/TEM (kyρti<1)
Med. (1<kyρti<4)
ETG/Streamers
(4<kyρti)
ITG
Spectra
6
Energy spectrum
(β=2.0%)
Poloidal wave number kyρti
Lin
ear
gro
wth
rate
R/v
ti
10
1
0.1
0.1 1 10
ITG/
TEM
ETG/
Strea
mers
Med.
Fie
ld e
ne
rgy W
k R
2/(
n0T
iρti2)
Time t vti/R
102
101
1
10-1
10-2
10-3
0 20 40 60 80
Zonal (kyρti=0)
ITG/TEM (kyρti<1)
Med. (1<kyρti<4)
ETG/Streamers
(4<kyρti)
ITG
Spectra
6
Energy spectrum
(β=2.0%)
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Poloidal wave number kyρti
Lin
ear
gro
wth
rate
R/v
ti
10
1
0.1
0.1 1 10
ITG/
TEM
ETG/
Strea
mers
Med.
Fie
ld e
ne
rgy W
k R
2/(
n0T
iρti2)
Time t vti/R
102
101
1
10-1
10-2
10-3
0 20 40 60 80
Zonal (kyρti=0)
ITG/TEM (kyρti<1)
Med. (1<kyρti<4)
ETG/Streamers
(4<kyρti)
ITG
Spectra
6
Energy spectrum
(β=2.0%)
ky
Wk
10
10-6
0.1 10
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Poloidal wave number kyρti
Lin
ear
gro
wth
rate
R/v
ti
10
1
0.1
0.1 1 10
ITG/
TEM
ETG/
Strea
mers
Med.
Fie
ld e
ne
rgy W
k R
2/(
n0T
iρti2)
Time t vti/R
102
101
1
10-1
10-2
10-3
0 20 40 60 80
Zonal (kyρti=0)
ITG/TEM (kyρti<1)
Med. (1<kyρti<4)
ETG/Streamers
(4<kyρti)
ITG
Spectra
6
Energy spectrum
(β=2.0%)
ky
Wk
10
10-6
0.1 10
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Poloidal wave number kyρti
Lin
ear
gro
wth
rate
R/v
ti
10
1
0.1
0.1 1 10
ITG/
TEM
ETG/
Strea
mers
Med.
Fie
ld e
ne
rgy W
k R
2/(
n0T
iρti2)
Time t vti/R
102
101
1
10-1
10-2
10-3
0 20 40 60 80
Zonal (kyρti=0)
ITG/TEM (kyρti<1)
Med. (1<kyρti<4)
ETG/Streamers
(4<kyρti)
ITG
Spectra
6
Energy spectrum
(β=2.0%)
ky
Wk
10
10-6
0.1 10
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Poloidal wave number kyρti
Lin
ear
gro
wth
rate
R/v
ti
10
1
0.1
0.1 1 10
ITG/
TEM
ETG/
Strea
mers
Med.
Fie
ld e
ne
rgy W
k R
2/(
n0T
iρti2)
Time t vti/R
102
101
1
10-1
10-2
10-3
0 20 40 60 80
Zonal (kyρti=0)
ITG/TEM (kyρti<1)
Med. (1<kyρti<4)
ETG/Streamers
(4<kyρti)
ITG
Spectra
6
Energy spectrum
(β=2.0%)
ky
Wk
10
10-6
0.1 10
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Wk
ky
10
10-6
0.1 10
Poloidal wave number kyρti
Lin
ear
gro
wth
rate
R/v
ti
10
1
0.1
0.1 1 10
ITG/
TEM
ETG/
Strea
mers
Med.
Electron energy diffusion spectrum in multi-scale turbulence is NOT a sum of single-scale ones.
7
In zero-β case, due to strong electron-scale suppression, ion-scale simulations give a good estimate.
In finite-β case, electron-scale suppression is weak. Ion-scale transport is enhanced in multi-scale analysis.
0.0001
0.01
1
100
0.1 1 10
(ce/c
gB
i)/(
Dk
yr
ti)
Poloidal wave number kyrti
Ion-scale sim. e=1.2gB
Electron-scale sim. e=5.4gB
Multi-scale sim. e=4.5gB
Poloidal wave number kyρti
0.1 1 10
Finite β case (β=2.0%)
102
1
10-2
10-4
Ele
ctr
on
th
erm
al d
iffu
sio
n
coeffic
ient
ek/
gB
* Ion energy diffusion is similar (see proceedings).
0.0001
0.01
1
100
0.1 1 10
(ce/c
gB
i)/(
Dk
yr
ti)
Poloidal wave number kyrti
Ion-scale sim. e=6.4gB
Electron-scale sim. e=7.2gB
Multi-scale sim. e=6.3gB
102
1
10-2
10-4
Ele
ctr
on
th
erm
al d
iffu
sio
n
co
effic
ien
t
ek/
gB
Zero-β case (β=0.04%)
Poloidal wave number kyρti
0.1 1 10
Analysis of nonlinear interactions Gyrokinetic triad transfer - Mode-to-mode nonlinear transfer of perturbed entropy
𝐼𝑠𝒌 = 𝐽𝑠𝒌𝒑,𝒒
𝒒𝒑
𝐽𝑠𝒌𝒑,𝒒= 𝛿𝒌+𝒑+𝒒,𝟎
𝒃 ⋅ 𝒑 × 𝒒
2𝐵
× Re 𝑑𝑣3 𝜒 𝑠𝒑𝑔𝑠𝒒 − 𝜒 𝑠𝒒𝑔𝑠𝒑𝑇𝑠𝑔𝑠𝒌𝐹𝑠𝑀
(Generalized potential 𝜒 𝑠𝒌 = 𝜙 𝒌 − 𝑣∥𝐴 ∥𝒌 、
Nonadiabatic distribution 𝑔𝑠𝒌 = 𝑓𝑠𝒌 +𝑒𝑠𝐹𝑠𝑀
𝑇𝑠𝜙 𝒌)
8
Radial wave number qxρti
Polo
idal w
ave n
um
ber
qyρ
ti
k
q
p
k+p+q=0
Electron-scale suppression mechanism: • Ion-scale ZF shearing? Or, Another structures? Ion-scale enhancement mechanism: • Inverse cascade to ion-scale turbulence? Or, Damping of ion-scale ZFs?
[Nakata12PoP]
Suppression of electron-scale streamers by high-kx ITG/TEM structures.
9
Radial wave number qxρti
Polo
idal w
ave n
um
be
r q
yρ
ti
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
[a.u.]
2×10-5
1×10-5
0
-1×10-5
-2×10-5
k (Streamer)
Triad transfer 𝐽𝑠𝒌𝒑,𝒒𝑠 for a streamer
(kxρti,kyρti)=(0,4.4) at t=20-30R/vti
Suppression of electron-scale streamers by high-kx ITG/TEM structures.
9
Radial wave number qxρti
Polo
idal w
ave n
um
be
r q
yρ
ti
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
[a.u.]
2×10-5
1×10-5
0
-1×10-5
-2×10-5
k (Streamer)
Triad transfer 𝐽𝑠𝒌𝒑,𝒒𝑠 for a streamer
(kxρti,kyρti)=(0,4.4) at t=20-30R/vti
p (~1.6ρti-1)
Kinetic electrons create fine radial structures (kxρti>1). [Dominski12JPCS,
Maeyama14PoP]
Suppression of electron-scale streamers by high-kx ITG/TEM structures.
9
Radial wave number qxρti
Polo
idal w
ave n
um
be
r q
yρ
ti
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
[a.u.]
2×10-5
1×10-5
0
-1×10-5
-2×10-5
k (Streamer)
Triad transfer 𝐽𝑠𝒌𝒑,𝒒𝑠 for a streamer
(kxρti,kyρti)=(0,4.4) at t=20-30R/vti
p (~1.6ρti-1)
At the reduction phase, these radial structures suppress streamers.
Kinetic electrons create fine radial structures (kxρti>1). [Dominski12JPCS,
Maeyama14PoP]
Suppression of electron-scale streamers by high-kx ITG/TEM structures.
9
Radial wave number qxρti
Polo
idal w
ave n
um
be
r q
yρ
ti
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
[a.u.]
2×10-5
1×10-5
0
-1×10-5
-2×10-5
k (Streamer)
q (Finer
mode)
Triad transfer 𝐽𝑠𝒌𝒑,𝒒𝑠 for a streamer
(kxρti,kyρti)=(0,4.4) at t=20-30R/vti
p (~1.6ρti-1)
At the reduction phase, these radial structures suppress streamers.
Kinetic electrons create fine radial structures (kxρti>1). [Dominski12JPCS,
Maeyama14PoP]
After suppression of ETG/streamers, normal cascade dominates electron scales.
10
At the steady state, normal cascade dominates via the direct coupling with ion-scale turbulent eddies.
Triad transfer 𝐽𝑠𝒌𝒑,𝒒𝑠 for a streamer
(kxρti,kyρti)=(0,4.4) at t=60-80R/vti
Radial wave number qxρti
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
[a.u]
2×10-6
1×10-6
0
-1×10-6
-2×10-6
Po
loid
al w
ave
nu
mb
er
qyρ
ti
k (Streamer)
After suppression of ETG/streamers, normal cascade dominates electron scales.
10
At the steady state, normal cascade dominates via the direct coupling with ion-scale turbulent eddies.
Triad transfer 𝐽𝑠𝒌𝒑,𝒒𝑠 for a streamer
(kxρti,kyρti)=(0,4.4) at t=60-80R/vti
Radial wave number qxρti
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
[a.u]
2×10-6
1×10-6
0
-1×10-6
-2×10-6
Po
loid
al w
ave
nu
mb
er
qyρ
ti
p (Ion
scales)
k (Streamer)
After suppression of ETG/streamers, normal cascade dominates electron scales.
10
At the steady state, normal cascade dominates via the direct coupling with ion-scale turbulent eddies.
Triad transfer 𝐽𝑠𝒌𝒑,𝒒𝑠 for a streamer
(kxρti,kyρti)=(0,4.4) at t=60-80R/vti
Radial wave number qxρti
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
[a.u]
2×10-6
1×10-6
0
-1×10-6
-2×10-6
Po
loid
al w
ave
nu
mb
er
qyρ
ti
p (Ion
scales)
k (Streamer)
q (Finer
mode)
Inefficient zonal mode generation in multi-scale turbulence.
11
Inverse cascade from electron to ion scales seems not to be responsible.
Comparing multi-scale simulation with single-scale one, Zonal part of field energy is relatively weak. Inefficient zonal mode generation is observed.
Nonlinear entropy
transfer for zonal modes
0 20 40 60 80
Time t vti/R
0.12
0.08
0.04
0
WZ
ona
l /Wn
on
-zona
l
0 20 40 60 80 Time t vti/R
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Ion-scale simulation
Multi-scale simulation
Ion-scale simulation
Multi-scale simulation
I kZ
ona
l /Drivin
g t
erm
Ratio of zonal to non-
zonal field energy
Enhancement of ion-scale turbulence is caused by damping of zonal modes.
12
Splitting ion- and electron-scale contributions clarifies Electron-scale turbulence has damping effects on
zonal modes around kxρti~1. → The reduction of ZF shearing enhances transport.
Entropy transfer spectrum
for zonal modes
Drive by ion scales
Damping by electron scales
Total Ion-scale simulation
Multi-scale simulation
Poloidal wave number kyρti
0.1 1 10
102
1
10-2
10-4
Ele
ctr
on
the
rmal diffu
sio
n
co
effic
ient
ek/
gB
Ion-scale sim. filtering ZFs (kxρti>0.8) Elec
tron-scale sim.
Test of reduced ZFs
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0.003
0.002
0.001
0
-0.001
JkΩ
p,Ω
q(k
y=
0)/
Drivin
g t
erm
Radial wave number kxρti
Summary and discussion
13
We have first analyzed multi-scale ITG/TEM/ETG turbulence with real mass ratio and β value. We have demonstrated the existence of multi-
scale interactions even with real mass ratio. - ETG/Streamers are suppressed by ITG/TEM turbulence.
ITG stabilization by finite-β effects makes
electron-scale contributions non-negligible. - We newly found that electron-scale turbulence can enhance ion-scale turbulent transport.
Summary and discussion
14
In terms of transport level estimation Multi-scale spectrum is NOT a sum of single scales. When ITGs are highly unstable, ion-scale simulations
give a good estimate of transport levels. In high-β regimes, electron scales can be important.
• Effective damping of ion-scale ZFs
ZF damping by Electron-scale turb.
ITG / TEM
ETG / Streamers
Zonal Flows
ETG reduction by ITG/TEM
Normal cascade via coupling with ITG/TEM turbulent eddies dominates electron scales.
Electron-scale turbulence acts as effective damping of ZFs.
In terms of turbulence physics