Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry
description
Transcript of Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry
![Page 1: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry
Zahra Shaterzadeh Yazdi
Institute for Quantum Information Science, University of Calgary
with Peter S. Turner and Dr. Barry C. Sanders IICQI 2007 Conference,
Kish University, Kish Island, Iran Sunday, 9th September 2007
![Page 2: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline:
Significance of squeezing for QIP
An efficient Method to characterize two-mode squeezing
Multi-mode squeezing and SU(1,1) symmetry
Open question
Conclusion
![Page 3: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Outline:
Significance of squeezing for QIP
An efficient Method to characterize multi-mode squeezing
Multi-mode squeezing and SU(1,1) symmetry
Open questions
Conclusion
![Page 4: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction: Squeezed light is the key source of entanglement for optical
quantum information processing tasks.
Such light can only be produced in a single mode and two modes by means of squeezers.
More general QIP tasks require the squeezed light to be distributed amongst multiple modes by passive optical elements such as beam splitters and phase shifters and squeezers.
http://www.pi4.uni-stuttgart.de/NeueSeite/index.html?research/homepage_ultrafast/ultrafast_propagation.htmlhttp://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/ostermeyer/web/contents/quantcrypto/nav_qc.html
![Page 5: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Application:Quantum teleportation2
SSbcbc
MMPPMMXX
BBabab
c
b
a
SSbcbc
MM
MM
BBabab
BBcdcd
a
d
c
b
SSbcbc
BBabab
BBcdcd
b
a
d
c
BBabab
SSbcbc
SSacac
c
b
a
Quantum state/secret sharing1
Entanglement swapping3 Testing Bell inequality4
![Page 6: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Finding the output state:
Employ covariance matrix5 if only Gaussian states used.
Wigner function2 has 2n degrees of freedom for n modes:
Apply transformation directly to canonical variables but
requires O(n2) parameters.
W q,p dnq
2 nq q '/ 2 q q '/ 2 eiq 'p
![Page 7: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Goals:
Employ Lie group theory to describe the mathematical transformation for active multi-mode interferometers with few squeezers.
This approach provides an elegant and efficient characterization of a large class of output states generated by such networks for any input states.
This simplification arises by identifying appropriate symmetries through making use of the available group representations.
![Page 8: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Outline:
Significance of squeezed states for QIP
An efficient Method to characterize two-mode squeezing
Multi-mode squeezing and SU(1,1) symmetry
Open questions
Conclusion
![Page 9: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Mathematical Foundation for Lie Group Theory:
Cartan and Casimir operators
Irreducible representations
Coherent states: Perelomov'sdefinition
Lie group
Lie algebra
![Page 10: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SU(2) Symmetry and SU(1,1) Symmetry
![Page 11: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Beam Splitter and Two-Mode Squeezer
SSababb
aaa
BBaabb
b
![Page 12: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Outline:
Significance of squeezing for QIP
An efficient Method to characterize multi-mode squeezing
Multi-mode squeezing and SU(1,1) symmetry
Open questions
Conclusion
![Page 13: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Motivation:Quantum teleportation2
SSbcbc
MMPPMMXX
BBabab
c
b
a
SSbcbc
MM
MM
BBabab
BBcdcd
a
d
c
b
SSbcbc
BBabab
BBcdcd
b
a
d
c
BBabab
SSbcbc
SSacac
c
b
a
Quantum state/secret sharing1
Entanglement swapping3 Testing Bell inequality4
![Page 14: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Multipartite Squeezing and SU(1,1) Symmetry:
ar
a4
a3
a2
a1
b1
bs
b2
b3
b4
ar
a4
a3
a2
a1
b1
bs
b2
b3
b4
SABSab
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
![Page 15: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Multipartite Squeezing… Cont’d...
Three mode: k, 1
2k 1-1 a k 1
a
a=0
k+ 1
a,k a 1, k
,
![Page 16: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
What is nice about our approach?!!!
It enables us to use a variety of mathematical properties that have already been established for this group, greatly facilitating calculations.
Examples:
The SU(1,1) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients are useful if we want to concatenate some of these typical networks ‘in parallel’.
The output states of such networks can be described by the coherent states of SU(1,1).
The significance of our result is that, in contrast to existing methods, it allows for arbitrary input states. This method
can therefore be used for a large class of output states.
S
S
![Page 17: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Outline:
Significance of squeezing for QIP
An efficient Method to characterize two-mode squeezing
Multi-mode squeezing and SU(1,1) symmetry
Open question
Conclusion
![Page 18: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Complicated Scenarios: Concatenation
SAB
SCD
SEF
SGH
SS
SS
SS
SS
BB
BB
BB
BB
BBBB
BB
![Page 19: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Complicated Scenarios: Bloch-Messiah Theorem
SCD
SAB
SEF
SCD
SGH
U V †
SAB
SCD
SEF
SGH
SS
SS
SS
SS
BBBB
BBBB
BBBB
BBBB
BBBBBBBB
BBBB
![Page 20: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Outline:
Significance of squeezing for QIP
An efficient Method to characterize multi-mode squeezing
Multi-mode squeezing and SU(1,1) symmetry
Open questions
Conclusion
![Page 21: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Conclusions:
Characterized typical multi-mode optical networks as SU(1,1) transformations: Multi-mode squeezed states generated in such networks are the SU(1,1) coherent states.
Simplifies calculations from O(n2) to constant number of parameters.
Identified the symmetries based on the group representations.
This approach is independent of input states (such as assuming covariance matrix or Wigner functions), because SU(1,1) weight states are equivalent to pseudo Fock states.
![Page 22: Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062217/56813cc2550346895da66eb5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
References:
1. T. Tyc and B. C. Sanders, PRA 65, 042310 (2002)
2. S. L. Braunstein and H. J. Kimble, PRL 80, 869 (1998).
3. O. Glock et al., PRA 68, 1 (2001)
4. S. D. Bartlett et al., PRA 63, 042310 (2001)
5. J. Eisert and M. B. Plenio, PRL 89, 097901 (2002)
6. S. L. Braunstein, PRA 71, 055801 (2005)