MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

15
MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR

Transcript of MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

Page 1: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA

KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E

AUGUST 25, 2011

SEAUPG WEBINAR

Page 2: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

SUMMARY

1. Data

2. Reporting / Rounding

3. Trends

4. Conclusions

5. Excel Macro Function

6. TA Instruments

Page 3: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

DATA

ER% = ASTM D 6084, 77 oF, RTFO

Temp (C) PG Source ER % R100 R3200 R diff G*/sind RTFO Jnr0.1 Jnr3.2 Jnr diff MSCR Grade

64.0 76-28 A1 95 98 98 0 2.48 0.01 0.02 3.3 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 92.5 94 94 0 3.94 0.03 0.03 -3.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A3 92.5 92 92 0 3.64 0.03 0.03 -3.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 3.28 0.01 0.01 -7.2 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 2.62 0.01 0.01 0.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 95 95 95 0 4.29 0.02 0.02 1.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 2.35 0.02 0.02 8.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A4 95 89 89 1 3.58 0.06 0.05 -12.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 81 81 -1 4.05 0.13 0.12 -8.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A5 87.5 74 72 3 3.9 0.20 0.21 6.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A1 95 95 95 0 2.66 0.05 0.05 -0.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 79 80 -1 4.17 0.15 0.13 -9.6 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A5 90 71 66 8 3.52 0.28 0.34 21.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 71 68 5 4.88 0.20 0.23 18.0 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A1 95 96 95 1 2.55 0.05 0.05 5.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A10 84 84 0 3 0.17 0.17 1.2 PG 64-28 E

64.0 64-22 A2 1 0 82 2.4 4.04 4.22 4.4

Page 4: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

DATA

ER% = PG 70-28 Min. 65, PG 76-28 Min. 75

Temp (C) PG Source ER % R100 R3200 R diff G*/sind RTFO Jnr0.1 Jnr3.2 Jnr diff MSCR Grade

64.0 64-22 A4 8 2 80 2.10 2.39 13.6 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A1 -3 0 113 3.28 3.27 -0.3 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A2 -2 0 108 2.51 3.81 3.86 1.5 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A7 42 23 45 3.35 1.32 1.90 43.8 PG 64-22 H

64.0 64-22 A10 0 2 -366 4.58 2.14 2.23 4.3 PG 64-22 S

64.0 70-28 A3 90 64 50 21 2.47 0.54 0.78 45.0 PG 64-28 V

64.0 76-28 A3 95 86 88 -2 2.88 0.10 0.09 -12.0 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 96 97 -1 2.87 0.03 0.03 -22.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A4 97.5 85 86 -2 2.85 0.11 0.10 -10.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 95 95 95 0 3.98 0.04 0.03 -16.6 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 95 94 95 -1 2.53 0.05 0.04 -15.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 64-22 A8 -3 0 104 2.22 4.60 4.72 2.6

64.0 64-22 A9 1 1 -16 3.29 2.87 3.03 5.6 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A1 8 1 81 3.96 2.18 2.47 13.4 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A11 4 0 97 2.45 3.83 4.18 9.1

64.0 64-22 A7 45 27 40 5.36 0.83 1.18 41.8 PG 64-22 H

64.0 64-22 A2 5 0 100 2.45 3.82 4.18 9.4

Page 5: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

REPORTING / ROUNDING

1. Data in Excel File Reported, Not Rounded

2. Computations Used Full ValuesAASHTO TP 70-4, 8.1.3.

Percent Recovery Data in Red:

1.0

2.31.0 100

R

RRRdiff

100

1

10001

diffR

74.81

5969.0

100109.05969.0

diffR

Vs.

Page 6: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

REPORTING / ROUNDING

Percent Recovery Data in Red:

9.1.2. PG Grade to nearest 0.1 oC?

2

86

1008886

diffR

949.1

21.86

10089.8721.86

diffR

Shown as -1.945 by TA Instruments, -2 in spreadsheet

Page 7: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

REPORTING / ROUNDING

1.0

1.02.3 100

J

JJJ nrnrnrdiff

0.0

03.0

10003.003.0

nrdiffJ

9.22

0332.0

1000332.00256.0

nrdiffJ

Page 8: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

TRENDSTemp (C) PG Source ER % R100 R3200 R diff G*/sind RTFO Jnr0.1 Jnr3.2 Jnr diff MSCR Grade

64.0 76-28 A1 95 98 98 0 2.48 0.01 0.02 3.3 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 92.5 94 94 0 3.94 0.03 0.03 -3.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A3 92.5 92 92 0 3.64 0.03 0.03 -3.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 3.28 0.01 0.01 -7.2 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 2.62 0.01 0.01 0.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 95 95 95 0 4.29 0.02 0.02 1.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 2.35 0.02 0.02 8.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A4 95 89 89 1 3.58 0.06 0.05 -12.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A3 95 86 88 -2 2.88 0.10 0.09 -12.0 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 96 97 -1 2.87 0.03 0.03 -22.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A4 97.5 85 86 -2 2.85 0.11 0.10 -10.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 95 94 95 -1 2.53 0.05 0.04 -15.8 PG 64-28 E

PG 76-28 = PG 64-28 E

Page 9: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

TRENDS

PG 70-28 PG 64-28 E

Temp (C) PG Source ER % R100 R3200 R diff G*/sind RTFO Jnr0.1 Jnr3.2 Jnr diff MSCR Grade

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 81 81 -1 4.05 0.13 0.12 -8.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A5 87.5 74 72 3 3.9 0.20 0.21 6.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A1 95 95 95 0 2.66 0.05 0.05 -0.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 79 80 -1 4.17 0.15 0.13 -9.6 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A5 90 71 66 8 3.52 0.28 0.34 21.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 71 68 5 4.88 0.20 0.23 18.0 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A1 95 96 95 1 2.55 0.05 0.05 5.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A10 84 84 0 3 0.17 0.17 1.2 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A3 90 64 50 21 2.47 0.54 0.78 45.0 PG 64-28 V

64.0 70-28 A4 95 95 95 0 3.98 0.04 0.03 -16.6 PG 64-28 E

Page 10: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

TRENDS

PG 64-22 PG 64-22 S

Temp (C) PG Source ER % R100 R3200 R diff G*/sind RTFO Jnr0.1 Jnr3.2 Jnr diff MSCR Grade

64.0 64-22 A2 1 0 82 2.4 4.04 4.22 4.4

64.0 64-22 A4 8 2 80 2.10 2.39 13.6 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A1 -3 0 113 3.28 3.27 -0.3 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A2 -2 0 108 2.51 3.81 3.86 1.5 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A7 42 23 45 3.35 1.32 1.90 43.8 PG 64-22 H

64.0 64-22 A10 0 2 -366 4.58 2.14 2.23 4.3 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A8 -3 0 104 2.22 4.60 4.72 2.6

64.0 64-22 A9 1 1 -16 3.29 2.87 3.03 5.6 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A1 8 1 81 3.96 2.18 2.47 13.4 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A11 4 0 97 2.45 3.83 4.18 9.1

64.0 64-22 A7 45 27 40 5.36 0.83 1.18 41.8 PG 64-22 H

64.0 64-22 A2 5 0 100 2.45 3.82 4.18 9.4

Page 11: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

TRENDS

1. Most PG 70-28’s and All PG 76-28’s Grade as PG 64-28 E

2. Jnr3.2 > 4.0 kPa-1 (4 of 12 PG 64-22)

• Not PG 64-22 S

3. Jnr3.2 < 0.0 kPa-1 (8 of 12 PG 76-28)

Page 12: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

CONCLUSIONS

1. R3.2 Limit Needed for: PG 70-28 and PG 76-28 - (60 Min. and 80 Min.?)

2. Other PG Grade Data Needed for R3.2 Limits

3. Do Not Round Computations Except for Limit Comparisons

Page 13: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.

EXCEL MACRO FUNCTIONFunction MSCRGrade(PG As String, TestTemp As Double, Jnr32 As Double, JnrDiff As Double) As String Dim iTestTemp As Double, iJnr32 As Double, iJnrDiff As Double Dim sColdTemp As String, suffix As String Application.Volatile iTestTemp = Round(TestTemp) sColdTemp = Split(PG, "-")(1) iJnr32 = WorksheetFunction.Round(Jnr32, 2) iJnrDiff = WorksheetFunction.Round(JnrDiff, 1) Select Case (True) Case iJnr32 < 0.5 And iJnrDiff <= 75: suffix = "E" Case iJnr32 <= 1 And iJnrDiff <= 75: suffix = "V" Case iJnr32 <= 2 And iJnrDiff <= 75: suffix = "H" Case iJnr32 <= 4 And iJnrDiff <= 75: suffix = "S" Case Else suffix = "NA" End Select If suffix = "NA" Then MSCRGrade = "" Else MSCRGrade = "PG " & iTestTemp & "-" & sColdTemp & " " & suffix End IfEnd Function

Page 14: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.
Page 15: MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR.