MS Project 2002 - Post Implementation Analysis

29
MS Project 2002 - MS Project 2002 - Post Implementation Post Implementation Analysis Analysis John Sage Aegon AIT - PMO Project Manager

description

MS Project 2002 - Post Implementation Analysis. John Sage Aegon AIT - PMO Project Manager. Aegon - Background. “Biggest Company Nobody Has Heard Of” Based in The Hague, Netherlands Life Insurance, Annuities, Pension Management 23,000 employees worldwide - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of MS Project 2002 - Post Implementation Analysis

Page 1: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

MS Project 2002 - MS Project 2002 -

Post Implementation AnalysisPost Implementation Analysis

John Sage

Aegon

AIT - PMO

Project Manager

Page 2: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Aegon - BackgroundAegon - Background

“Biggest Company Nobody Has Heard Of”

Based in The Hague, Netherlands Life Insurance, Annuities, Pension Management 23,000 employees worldwide Growth through acquisition – Transamerica, Providian,

JC Penney (Insurance) Aegon, USA – 10,000 employees US Sites – Cedar Rapids/IA, Louisville/KY, St.

Petersburg/FL, Los Angeles / CA, Kansas City / MO, Atlanta / GA, Plano / TX, Charlotte / NC, Purchase / NY, Baltimore / MD

Information Technology Staff - 600 employees

Page 3: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

AIT – PMO Background AIT PMO approved in 2001 Critical first step was developing our project process

methodology based on PMI’s PMBOK and tailored to Aegon culture. (January - June 2002)

MS Project was the de-facto standard for a PM tool. (98 & 2000) Aegon, USA owned about 2,000 licenses Aegon, USA was moving from a more autonomous regional site

structure to a centralized IT functionality with distributed team members

A centralized project database was created to support some very basic portfolio functionality inclusive of reporting. This was developed with MS Access

As the PMO and the PM processes quickly matured to the next level the MS Access database no longer served the need

Page 4: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

MS Project 2002 - DecisionMS Project 2002 - Decision Factors driving decision on a Portfolio Management Tool

decision:– Existing de-facto standard was MS Project & meant possible easier

implementation

– Heavy investment in MS Project

– Microsoft upgrade incentive was a huge potential savings

– New features met key shopping list items:

• Easy access from multiple locations

• Adequate security by roles & responsibilities

• Repository for project related documents & issues

• Ease of use, especially by project team members

• Portfolio analysis tool was needed

• Reporting - “Ad Hoc” & “What If” support

Page 5: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

MS Project 2002Predefined Security Groups

ŸAdministratorŸŸExecutiveŸŸPortfolio ManagerŸŸProject ManagerŸŸResource ManagerŸŸTeam LeadŸŸTeam Members

Users publishing projects to the projectserver are auto-assigned to this group.

Resources with assignments are auto-assigned to this group.

Page 6: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

MS Project 2002Predefined Categories

My Organization - All projects with all views of the data available.

Administrators, Portfolio Managers, Executives

My Projects - All projects that a user manages or is assigned to with allviews of the data available.

Project Managers, Team Leads, Resource Managers

My Tasks - All projects that a user is assigned to with only a view of theassignments of those projects.

Team Members

My Resources - Data that covers the resources reporting to a user.

Page 7: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

USERS

GROUPS CATEGORIES

RIGHTSAND

VIEWS

Page 8: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

MS Project 2002Enterprise Mode Architecture

ProjectWeb

Access

ProjectProfessional

IIS SERVER SQL SERVER

PortfolioData

Service(Security Layer)

ProjectBusiness

Object

OLEDBProvider

Share PointTeam

Services

NotificationProcessEngine(SMTP)

SQL 2000Enterprise VersionAnalysis Services

OLAPCUBE

(Online analyticalprocessing)

EnterpriseTables

ProjectServerTables

ProjectData

Tables

ViewTables Resource

Project

Page 9: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Got PM Process?Got PM Process?

• Develop PM process first.

• Use tool to reinforce the process.

Page 10: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Show Me the DigitsShow Me the Digits

Total Project Server Accounts - 400 Administrators - 4 Executives - 38 Project Managers - 75 Project Team Members - 283

Page 11: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Current Project PortfolioCurrent Project Portfolio

Total Current Projects = 67

Page 12: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Top 10 Reasons To Use MS 2002Top 10 Reasons To Use MS 20021. Central Project Repository (Enterprise Collaboration)

2. Project Web Sites

3. Utilizes Existing Windows Authentication

4. Web Enabled

5. Enterprise Resource Pool

6. Scheduled Status Reports

7. Custom Enterprise Fields

8. Exchange Interface (Task assignments, overdue notification, status reports, changes, etc.)

9. Project Guide

10. Project Analyzer / Project Modeler

Page 13: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Central Project Repository - 1Central Project Repository - 1

Page 14: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Project Web Sites - 2Project Web Sites - 2

Page 15: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Utilizes Existing Windows Utilizes Existing Windows Authentication - 3Authentication - 3

Page 16: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Web Enabled - 4Web Enabled - 4 Project Web Site -

http://crdcintranet2/251/

Project Web Access (Home Page)

http://project.aegonusa.com/projectserver/home/homepage.asp?loading=1

Page 17: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Enterprise Resource Pool - 5Enterprise Resource Pool - 5

Page 18: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Status Report – 6-1Status Report – 6-1

Page 19: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Status Report – 6-2Status Report – 6-2

Page 20: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Status Report – 6-3Status Report – 6-3

Page 21: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Custom Enterprise Fields - 7Custom Enterprise Fields - 7

Page 22: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Exchange Interface - 8Exchange Interface - 8 Please update your status on the tasks listed below. Thank you.

Project: XP-LA Assign to: Sage John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Task Name: Contact and train project team on PWA Start: 4/1/03 Finish: 4/3/03 Work: 16h Rem Work: 0h -----------------------------------------------------------------------

To view and respond to the changes, please connect to your Microsoft Project Web Access timesheet at http://project.aegonusa.com/ProjectServer/Tasks/Taskspage.asp?AllTasks=1&FilterBy=9&GanttView=0.

To turn off these notifications, please connect to http://project.aegonusa.com/ProjectServer/notifications/self_notifications.asp and clear the check box for task notifications.

Microsoft Project Server

Page 23: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Project Guide - 9Project Guide - 9

Page 24: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Project Analyzer - 10Project Analyzer - 10

Page 25: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Project Modeler - 10Project Modeler - 10

Page 26: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Project Modeler - 10Project Modeler - 10

Page 27: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

IssuesIssues

WAN performance for MS Project 2002 Professional

requires Terminal Server or Citrix for adequate throughput

(Project Managers)

Keyword search of project documents not working

More document management features like version control

Page 28: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

Next StepsNext Steps

Customize Project Guide

Implementation in non IT areas

Analysis and testing of next release

Page 29: MS Project 2002 -  Post Implementation Analysis

QUESTIONS / COMMENTS ?