8/12/2019 MR Seralini Republication 25/06/14

1/2

Gene Ethics Media Release - June 25, 2014

Seralini Roundup & GM maize toxicity study re-published today

The 2 year Seralini experiments which found rats are harmed by Roundup and GMmaize have been vindicated. The Springer Groups Journal Environmental SciencesEuroperepublished the paper today.

"Republication of the Seralini study vindicates sound independent science, the scientific method andthe system of peer-reviewed publication," says Gene Ethics Director Bob Phelps.

"Seralini found that GM maize and residues of the Roundup herbicide sprayed on the crop were toxic

to laboratory rats and their findings are now validated by this republication in a very reputable journal.

It's now clear that some varieties of GM foods and toxic chemical residues harm experimental

animals and probably us too.

"It was first published inFood and Chemical Toxicologyjournal but the editor retracted the peer-

reviewed study under extreme duress from corporate interests and scientific bullies.

"But the grounds for retraction were nonsense as they did not conform with the agreed rules for

retractions and erased the validity of all scientific peer-review processes.

In trying to justify his retraction, the Editor of Food and Chemical Toxicology wrote:

"A careful and time-consuming analysis found that the data were inconclusive, and thereforethe conclusions described in the article were unreliable. Accordingly, the article was retracted."

"But the findings of all published and peer-reviewed papers are inconclusive as they must open toreview and refutation. If not, they would not be the products of scientific inquiry which is always a work

in progress," says Phelps.

"Seralini's team and their methods were found to be honest and sound. If not, the retraction would

have been justified and this peer-reviewed republication would be impossible.

"Seralinis results show up the flaws in corporate research and the need to put the onus of proof for

the safety and efficacy of GM crops and foods onto the GM industry.

"GM crop and food approvals rely mostly on corporate data which uses smaller sample sizes, short 90day duration of experiments and lacks of independence. This should be grounds for reviewing all GMproduct approvals.

"We call on our governments to remove GM foods and toxic chemical residues from the human foodsupply now," Mr Phelps concludes.

More comment: 0449 769 066

8/12/2019 MR Seralini Republication 25/06/14

2/2

Professor Seralini's Media Release Paris: 24/6/14

Republication of retracted study announced

The 2012 study on the chronic toxicity of Roundup herbicide and the geneticallymodified Roundup-tolerant maize NK603 by Professor Gilles-Eric Sralini andcolleagues has been republished by the Springer group, with open access to its rawdata. Now there will be a few embarrassing questions for the authorities.

After two years of controversy and pressure that led to the retraction of the study in November 2013,

which was first published in 2012 by theFood and Chemical Toxicology(Elsevier group) journal, theresearch team of Professor Sralini has announced that they have republished the study in theJournal Environmental Sciences Europe, published by the Springer Group.

By republishing their study with some new data which are available online, the team of Professor

Sralini confirms that the world's best-selling pesticide, Roundup, causes severe liver and kidneydeficiencies and hormonal disturbances, such as breast tumours, at low environmentally relevant

levels. Similar effects were observed from the chronic consumption of Roundup-tolerant GM maize.

This is due to residues of Roundup and to the specific genetic modification of this maize. The

formulations of Roundup, as well as Roundup-tolerant GMOs, should therefore be consideredendocrine (hormone) disruptors and should be re-evaluated for safety by the health authorities.

Winfried Schrder, editor of the journalEnvironmental Sciences Europeof the Springer Group, stated:''We want to enable a rational discussion about the study of Sralini et al. (Food Chem Toxicol 2012,

50:4221-4231) by republishing it. This methodological competition is the energy necessary for any

scientific progress. The sole purpose is to enable some scientific transparency and on this basis, adiscussion that does not try to hide, but focuses on these needed methodological controversies.

The research team of Prof Sralini made the choice of an open access publication in a peer-reviewedjournal, which arranged the third peer-reviewed assessment of the study. The researchers have

published online the raw data of the study with free access for the entire scientific community -something that the industry has always refused to do, claiming commercial confidentiality orintellectual property restrictions. But is there any real secret to keep? How could the results of a health

study violate an industrial secret? Is industry hiding the actual toxicity of compounds that accumulate

in our bodies and our environment?

Dr Jol Spiroux de Vendmois, medical doctor and President of CRIIGEN says, "Pesticides such as

Roundup and agricultural GMOs cannot be ignored in the explanation of the epidemic ofenvironmental pathologies. In addition, he emphasizes the deficiency of the regulatory assessmentof pesticides and GMOs, which endangers public health."

CRIIGEN is asking for free access to toxicological studies which have authorised the placing on themarket of different formulations of Roundup, the free access to raw data on the toxicological urine and

blood analyses for all products, and urges the legal authorities to undertake further public research,

with a commitment to placing its findings in the public domain, regarding the possible toxicological andendocrine disrupting effects of GMOs and Roundup, as other pesticides, using long-term exposureperiods to ensure the real protection of public health.

Contact:presse@criigen.infoTel. in France: 02 31 56 56 84