Mozart, String Quintets in C Major & G Minor (1788)
description
Transcript of Mozart, String Quintets in C Major & G Minor (1788)
Mozart, String Quintets in C Major & G Minor (1788)
Recording: Franz Beyer
& the Melos Quartet (1987)
Hold Assignment II until the Break
DQ64: Who is Ordinary Reader?
Some Commentators: Ordinary Reader of Protected Category in Question
• How Show Fact-Finder?
DQ64: Who is Ordinary Reader?
Some Commentators: Ordinary Reader of Protected Category in Question
• How Show Fact-Finder? – Expert Testimony– Members of Group– Focus on Stereotypes/Cultural Symbols
DQ64: Who is Ordinary Reader?
Some Commentators: Ordinary Reader of Protected Category in Question
• Statutory & Policy Arguments (Pro and Con): ALPS
DQ64: Who is Ordinary Reader?
Some Commentators: Ordinary Reader of Protected Category in Question
• Note: Courts have split
DQ64: Who is Ordinary Reader?
Should definition vary with publication in which ad appears:
• Ordinary NY Times Reader?
• Ordinary NY Post Reader?
ANNOUNCEMENTS
• ASSIGNMENT II: SUBMIT AT BREAK
• ASSIGNMENT III– Pick up ad at break– Qs?
ANNOUNCEMENTS
• ASSIGNMENT II: SUBMIT AT BREAK• ASSIGNMENT III• UNIT IV ONLINE
– Not Doing Standing– Definitional Qs– Statutory Drafting
• In-Class Group Exercise on Thurs 10/12• Review Substantive Material for Midterm• Techniques for Assignment IV & Final Exam
ANNOUNCEMENTS
• ASSIGNMENT II: SUBMIT AT BREAK
• ASSIGNMENT III
• UNIT IV ONLINE
• INFO MEMO #3– Assmt I Comments & Models– Old Exam Qs Covering Unit IV Material– Groups for 10/12 Drafting Exercise
ANNOUNCEMENTS
• ASSIGNMENT II: SUBMIT AT BREAK
• ASSIGNMENT III
• UNIT IV ONLINE
• INFO MEMO #3
• FORM FOR SCHEDULING MAKE-UP CLASS
Mt. Aconagua, Argentina
DQ65: ANDES
Most/Least Problematic: a) “ Divorced white professional female
seeks roommate”
b) “ Spanish speaker preferred”
c) “ Perfect for Singles or Couple”
d) “ Walking distance to shopping”
e) “ Convenient to Knights of Columbus”
DQ66: Human Models
• Every court that has addressed issue has held use of human models can violate 3604(c).
• Not particularly controversial today
DQ66: Human Models
• Courts hold use of human models can violate 3604(c)
• Statutory Arguments in Support– No language to contrary– Models can “indicate a preference”– Non-Binding HUD Reg (24 CFR §109)
DQ66: Human Models
• Courts hold use of human models can violate 3604(c)
• Policy Arguments in Support– If discouraging applicants, should ban– Pictures can be stronger than words– Completely within control of advertiser.
DQ66: Human Models
• Courts hold use of human models can violate 3604(c)
• Policy Arguments in Support– If discouraging applicants, should ban– Pictures can be stronger than words– Completely within control of advertiser.
• Best Counterarguments?
DQ66: Human Models (Andes)
• Cases all involve race or familial status
• Possibility of human model claim based in “Handicap”?– What might you do with a multi-photo ad
campaign to avoid claim of dispreference based on “handicap”?
DQ66: Human Models (Andes)
• Cases all involve race or familial status
• Possibility of human model claim based in “Handicap”?– What might you do with a multi-photo ad
campaign to avoid claim of dispreference based on “handicap”?
– Should human models caselaw be extended to include “handicap”?
DQ67: Evidence in Saunders• 68-photo brochure; virtually no Afr-Am models
(face of ads + common sense)
• Expert testimony re effects of racial composition of ads
• Testimony re reaction by members of group
• Evid. of Ds intent: notes re draft of brochure – Note Q’ing where “best places for blacks” would be– Note re use of models in picture of swimming pool
• “shd we use blacks in this area?”• “Yes (not in water per J.H.”)
DQ67: Saunders (Andes)
Suppose D argues:
We should be allowed to manipulate race (etc.) to make most of our target audience comfortable, so long as we’re not sending exclusionary messages.
OK under statute?
DQ67: Saunders Remedy:Possible Arguments by Plaintiff
• Re Injunction:– fraud– only put in Afr-Am models right before trial– underlying violation– general reluctance to comply
DQ67: Saunders Remedy:Possible Arguments by Plaintiff
• Re Injunction:– fraud– only put in Afr-Am models right before trial– underlying violation– general reluctance to comply
• Re Proportional Representation: – Given history of resistence, fair remedy– Only way to guarantee won’t be manipulated
DQ67: Saunders Remedy
Note that even with fairly unsympathetic large repeat offender, court is reluctant to impose very strong remedy.
DISCUSSION GROUPSSPRING DQ 68-69-70Canepa, BernardCanepa, Bernard Frazer, Amanda Hager, LaurenKim, Michael Potu, SwethaZarin, GregoryLEFT FRONT
FALL: DQ 68-69-70James, Robert Lomax, ChrisMeisels, EstherMeisels, EstherMoskowitz, OrenOhayon, CoreyLEFT REAR
SUMMER: DQ 69-70-68Harrison, Stacy Mroczek, AshleyNuzum, RobertOppenheimer, Daniel Tankha, NeenaWolgin, MichaelWolgin, MichaelRIGHT FRONT
WINTER: DQ 70-68-69Drude, Rachel Drude, Rachel McGinn, ShannonMuller, ErikaSteinman, Rebecca Townsend, HenryRIGHT REAR
DQ68. Saunders holds discriminatory adverti-sing doesn’t violate §1982. Assume Ps appeal that decision.
Arguments for each side based on statutory language & what you know of Congress’s intent?
In fn1, court says this statutory question is essentially irrelevant to the result in Saunders anyway. Can you think of a situation where it might matter?
•DQ69. Developer advertising new houses (“Fungible Estates”) built on the edge of a major city, runs ads on billboards which say:
We At The New Fungible Estates Development (Located at 17000 175th Ave) Believe That The Fair Housing Act is a Violation of Your Consti-tutional Rights to Property and Association.
Does this violate the FHA?- Start w Ordinary Reader Test- Discuss Facts/Context That Might Matter
DQ70. How do the Wisconsin and Miami Beach provisions on
advertising differ from §3604(c)?
• Create a list of differences for each.
• Try to identify situations where the differences in language would yield different results?
DISCUSSION GROUPSSPRING DQ 68-69-70Canepa, BernardCanepa, Bernard Frazer, Amanda Hager, LaurenKim, Michael Potu, SwethaZarin, GregoryLEFT FRONT
FALL: DQ 68-69-70James, Robert Lomax, ChrisMeisels, EstherMeisels, EstherMoskowitz, OrenOhayon, CoreyLEFT REAR
SUMMER: DQ 69-70-68Harrison, Stacy Mroczek, AshleyNuzum, RobertOppenheimer, Daniel Tankha, NeenaWolgin, MichaelWolgin, MichaelRIGHT FRONT
WINTER: DQ 70-68-69Drude, Rachel Drude, Rachel McGinn, ShannonMuller, ErikaSteinman, Rebecca Townsend, HenryRIGHT REAR