Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

14
Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity Dr Grant Hamilton Be/er sampling strategies for post harvest grain in Australia

description

Sound sampling strategies are an essential foundation for effective integrated pest management. In this project we have successfully combined data collected from bulk grain storages with ecological and statistical theory to develop robust, flexible sampling strategies for stored grains. These novel sampling methods can be adapted along the stored grains supply chain based on the differing needs of stakeholders, and can incorporate a variety of important factors, such as climate and grain moisture content, that will impact on insect infestation dynamics.

Transcript of Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

Page 1: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity

Dr  Grant  Hamilton  

Be/er  sampling  strategies  for  post  harvest  grain  in  Australia  

Page 2: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

Project  Aims  

•  To  review  current  sampling  methodologies    •  develop  a  flexible,  staBsBcally  robust  sampling  system  for  the  detecBon  of  post-­‐harvest  grain  storage  pests  in  the  Australian  grains  industry.  

Page 3: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

1:  review  of  sampling    

•  Current  sampling  gives  a  number  of  opportuniBes  to  detect  infestaBons  

•  In  the  1950’s  Australia  began  to  develop  a  reputaBon  for  infested  grain  

•  Response  -­‐  Export  grain  regulaBons  (1963)  •  NO  live  insects  •  Grain  needed  to  be  sampled  –  but  how  much?  

– Will  determine  how  effecBve  a  sampling  programme  is  at  detecBng  what  is  there  

   

Page 4: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

1:  review  of  sampling    •  2.25L  /33  Tonnes  –  based  on  pragmaBc  consideraBons  –  Belt  loading  speeds  –  Smoko  breaks  –  Size  of  storages  and  transport  infrastructure  –  Samplers  capacity  to  sieve  sample  

•  sampling  model  reviewed  by  Hunter  and  Griffiths  (1978)  

•  reasonable  IF  insects  spread  homogeneously    

Page 5: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

Hunter  and  Griffiths  

Page 6: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

•  But  they’re  not  – Grain  type  – Behaviour  – Micro-­‐climaBc  condiBons  – Storage  type  

Grant  Hamilton  and  David  Elmouee  (2011).  Insect  distribuBons  and  sampling  protocols  for  stored  commodiBes.  Stewart  Postharvest  Review  

Page 7: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

2:  New  sampling  model  

•  To  be  more  accurate  sampling  model  needs  to  account  for  heterogeneous  distribuBon  

Page 8: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

2:  new  sampling  model  

•  New  sampling  model  -­‐  number  of  samples  that  need  to  be  taken  to  detect  (rejecBon  sampling  approach)  

– ProporBon  of  grain  infested  p  – Density  of  infestaBon  λ  – Size  of  sample  unit  

                 

Elmouee,  Kiermeier  and  Hamilton.  (2010).  Pest  management  Science  

Page 9: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

Advantages  

•  Closer  representaBon  of  biological  system-­‐  greater  capacity  to  detect  infestaBons  

•  Parameters  intuiBve    •  Inform  parameters  from  range  of  informaBon  sources  (expert  opinion,  samples  taken  for  other  reasons)  

Page 10: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

3:  Assess  the  accuracy    

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

1

LL HH VH HL

Perc

enta

ge m

odel

suc

cess

Type of Infestation

CM

H&G

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

1

LL MM HM ML

Perc

enta

ge m

odel

suc

cess

Type of Infestation

CM

H&G

Rhyzopertha  dominica  

Cryptolestes  ferrugineus  

(Density  of  infestaBon,  ProporBon  infested)  

oversampling  undersampling  

2  bins  –Parameter  esBmates  1,  permute  and  ‘sample’  other  2    10,000  simulaBons    

Page 11: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

4:  Sampling  for  Integrated  Pest  Management  

•  Sampling  integral  to  IPM  programmes  •  Can  inform  decisions  (to  treat,  treatment  type,  movement  of  product)  

•  Currently  modelling  rejecBon  (decision  to  treat/fumigate)  based  on  detecBon  of  single  insect  

•  Use  model  for  scenario  tesBng–  treat  at  some  higher  acBon  threshold      

Page 12: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

Other  outcomes    

•  Masters  project  – 3D  analysis  spaBal  locaBon  Rd  –  IntegraBng  with  sampling  model  

Steel,  Elmouee,  Hamilton.  JSPR,  2012  

30°C, 14 days

Horiz. dist from PoI

Hor

iz. d

ist f

rom

PoI

10cm5cm0cm5cm

10cm

10cm 5cm

0cm

5cm

10cm

25°C, 1 gen.

Horiz. dist from PoI

Hor

iz. d

ist f

rom

PoI

10cm5cm0cm5cm

10cm

10cm 5cm

0cm

5cm

10cm

30°C, 1 gen.

Horiz. dist from PoI

Hor

iz. d

ist f

rom

PoI

10cm5cm0cm5cm

10cm

10cm 5cm

0cm

5cm

10cm

35°C, 1 gen.

Horiz. dist from PoI

Hor

iz. d

ist f

rom

PoI

10cm5cm0cm5cm

10cm

10cm 5cm

0cm

5cm

10cm

Horiz. dist from PoI

Vert.

dis

t fro

m P

oI

37.5cm32.5cm27.5cm22.5cm17.5cm12.5cm

7.5cm2.5cm

10cm 5cm

0cm

5cm

10cm

Horiz. dist from PoI

Vert.

dis

t fro

m P

oI

37.5cm32.5cm27.5cm22.5cm17.5cm12.5cm

7.5cm2.5cm

10cm 5cm

0cm

5cm

10cm

Horiz. dist from PoI

Vert.

dis

t fro

m P

oI

37.5cm32.5cm27.5cm22.5cm17.5cm12.5cm

7.5cm2.5cm

10cm 5cm

0cm

5cm

10cm

Horiz. dist from PoI

Vert.

dis

t fro

m P

oI

37.5cm32.5cm27.5cm22.5cm17.5cm12.5cm

7.5cm2.5cm

10cm 5cm

0cm

5cm

10cm

Low

High

Page 13: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

Outcomes  for  industry  •  Review  •  TheoreBcal  framework  for  further  work      •  Model  can  be  used  to  establish  level  of  confidence  from  number  of  samples  

•  Model  structured  so  that  different  forms  of  informaBon  can  be  used  

•  Sampling  could  base  on  fixed  number  of  samples  rather  than  by  size  of  consignment  

•  StaBsBcal  foundaBon  for  alternaBve  acBon  thresholds        

Page 14: Moving towards IPM with robust sampling strategies

Thanks  •  Dr.  David  Elmouee  •  Peterson  family  (Killarney)  •  Philip  Burrill,  GRDC  •  Pat  Collins,  Greg  Daglish,  Manoj  Nayak  •  Jim  Eldridge  and  Roderic  Steel  (QUT)  •  CBH,  Graincorp,  Viterra,    •  Dr.  Andreas  Kiermeier  –  SARDI    •  Dr.  Paul  Flinn  –  USDA  •  Prof.  Bhadriraju  Subramanyam  &  Prof.  David  Hagstrum  –  

KSU