Chapter 22 GC & LC. 22-1 Gas Chromatography 1.Schematic diagram.
Moving a Method From GC/NPD to LC/MS - Trace Organic · Moving a Method From GC/NPD to LC/MS Drugs...
Transcript of Moving a Method From GC/NPD to LC/MS - Trace Organic · Moving a Method From GC/NPD to LC/MS Drugs...
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOW 11Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB
Moving a Method From Moving a Method From GC/NPD to LC/MSGC/NPD to LC/MS
Drugs in UrineDrugs in UrineCentre for ToxicologyCentre for ToxicologyUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Calgary
November 2007November 2007Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB
Company CarCompany Car
November 2007November 2007Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB
Vogon CorporateVogon Corporate
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 44
HistoryHistory• 6 compounds in method
– Methylphenidate (Ritalin)– Meperidine (Demerol)– Normeperidine– Propoxyphene (Darvon)– Norpropoxyphene– Pentazocine (Talwin)
• Non-reactive to immunoassay screening– GC/NPD Screen– GC/MSD confirmation
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 55
Initial ThoughtsInitial Thoughts• Why not just skip NPD analysis?
– Same sample workup as MSD– NPD seems redundant
• Instrument availability– NPD available– MSD used for many methods– Only presumptive positives need to be
confirmed– Addition of Ritalinic acid
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 66
IssuesIssues• Screening and confirmation using 3 methods• Want 3 additional compounds• Time consuming
– Sample workup• LLE + centrifuge + 2 transfers + N-evap with solvent
exchange• 7 samples prep time = 45 - 60 minutes
• GC/MSD Confirmation– Poor peak shapes and reproducibility– Recoveries 38 - 132% RSD = 6.6 – 9.5% (n=6)– Confidence in results is low – Injection cycle time: 30 min
April 2008 WCTOW Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Services, Calgary, AB
7
StructuresMethylphenidate (Ritalin)
Pentazocine
Buprenorphine
April 2008 WCTOW Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Services, Calgary, AB
8
Propoxyphene Structure
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 99
GC/NPD OutlineGC/NPD Outline
• Make urine basic with KOH• Liquid-liquid extraction to diethyl ether• Concentrate with N-evap• Solvent exchange to toluene• GC/NPD with ISTD (diphenylamine)
– Presumptive positives (> 200 ng/mL) -> GC/MS
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 1010
GC/MS ConfirmationGC/MS Confirmation
• Presumptive positives injected in scan mode– Library match > 80% goes to confirmation
• New sample aliquot– Same sample workup– Labeled drugs as ISTD’s – GC/MSD
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 1111
Additional CompoundsAdditional Compounds• Buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine
– Current method• Hydrolyzed• SPE cleanup• Derivatization• GC/MSD
• Ritalinic acid– Ritalin metabolite– Not analyzed
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 1212
Alternative Method 1Alternative Method 1
• LC/MS/MS (Agilent QQQ with ES+ MRM)– 6 current compounds + 3 additional compounds– Recoveries 81-109% SD = 0.4 - 5.2% (n=4)– Quantitation and confirmation in one method– Confidence in results (2 transitions each = 4 EU points)– Very fast
• Sample workup– 1:10 dilution + filtration (sample needs acidification!)– 7 samples prep time = 17 minutes
• Injection cycle time: 9 min
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 1313
Alternative Method 2Alternative Method 2• LC/MSD (Agilent 1100 with ES+ SIM)
– Recoveries 51 -109% (n=4); pentazocine interference (~ 1,800 ng/mL)– Screening method
• Very low fragmentation to qualifier ions– 6 compounds 2-10% of target– 2 compounds 15-25%– 1 compound at 100%
• Common ions in SIM require chromatographic separation– Confidence in results (1 target ion + 1 qualifier ion = 2 EU points)– Needs confirmation method (GC/MS or LC/MS/MS)– Very fast
• Sample workup– 1:10 dilution + filtration– 7 samples prep time = 17 minutes
• Injection cycle time: 17 min
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 1414
Acetonitrile Acetonitrile vsvs. Methanol. Methanol
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 1515
Compound RecoveriesCompound RecoveriesCompound GC/NP/MSD LC/MS/MS LC/MSD
Ritalinic acid 81.4 ± 2.8 51.0 ± 0.7
Methylphenidate 38 / 66 94.0 ± 0.4 90.5 ± 1.6
Meperidine 91 / 110 93.9 ± 1.4 95.4 ± 1.5
Normeperidine 132 / 69 87.6 ± 1.9 77.7 ± 0.8
Pentazocine 114 / 118 93.5 ± 0.9 Interference
Propoxyphene 48 / 100 ± 1.3 105 ± 2.0
Norpropoxyphene 109 ± 1.1 109 ± 1.0
Buprenorphine 99.5 ± 2.2 109 ± 1.6
Norbuprenorphine 95.6 ± 5.2 74.9 ± 1.2
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 1616
Metabolite AnalysisMetabolite AnalysisRitalinic Ritalinic acidacid
Sample MPH(CFT)
MPH(VLS)
RIT-a(CFT)
RIT-a(VLS)
A 1,280 1,360 - 19,100
B N.D. 3 - 62
C 458 125 - 111,000
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 1717
Method SummaryMethod Summary
• There are difficulties in all methods– GC/NPD/MSD
• Highly variable• Compounds disappear• Solvent exchange is tedious
– LC/MSD• Low fragmentation gives low qualifier response
– None for ritalinic acid in urine, due to interferences• Will require confirmation method (GC/MSD or LC/MS/MS)• Pentazocine interference
– Can be overcome using 2 qualifiers
– LC/MS/MS• Instrument availability
April 2008 WCTOW Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Services, Calgary, AB
18
Glucuronic Acid
April 2008 WCTOW Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Services, Calgary, AB
19
StructuresMethylphenidate (Ritalin)
Pentazocine
Buprenorphine
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 2020
GlucuronidesGlucuronides
• Not all standards available• Add ion for conjugate (+ 176 amu)• Need to hydrolyze
– Quantitate on non-conjugated compounds
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 2121
Method ComparisonMethod ComparisonCharacteristic GC/NP/MSD LC/MS/MS LC/MSD
Prep time (n = 7) 45 – 60 min 17 min 17 min
Instrument time 30 min 9 min 17 min
Recoveries 38 – 132% 81 – 109% 51 – 109%
CV’s 7 – 9% 0.4 – 5% 0.7 - 2%
Confirmation Points 2-3 4 1-2
Acceptable chromatography
No(peak shapes)
Yes No(pentazocine interference; blanks up to 1,800 ng/mL )
Compound stability No(variable responses)
Yes Yes
LOQ (ng/mL) 100 1 – 10 100
Instrument available Yes No Yes
April 2008 WCTOW Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Services, Calgary, AB
22
Method FlowchartProtein Precipitation
and Dilution
LC/MS SIM
Above cut-off?
New Aliquot
New Aliquot Hydrolyze
Confirmation Method
BUP, norBUP, PEN,
or Gluc’s?
Report “Positive”
Above Cutoff?
Report “Negative”
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 2323
ValidationValidation• Linearity to 2,500 ng/mL: R2 0.994 - 0.999• LOD’s lower than GC: 10 - 100 ng/mL• Carryover ~ 20 ng/mL after high standard• Precision at cutoff (300 ng/mL):
– Method < 12% (n = 11)– Instrument < 2% (n = 7)
• Recoveries: 73 - 129%• GC - LC comparison: general agreement
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 2424
Thank You!Thank You!
• WCTOW is a sure sign of spring• April showers bring May flowers…
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 2525
May 24, 2007May 24, 2007
April 2008 WCTOWApril 2008 WCTOWRalph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory Ralph Hindle, Vogon Laboratory
Services, Calgary, ABServices, Calgary, AB 2626
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
• Centre for Toxicology (U. Calgary)– Dr. David Kinniburgh– Lorinda Butlin– Kathy Hunt