MOROCCAN SARDINE FIP - Seafish · MOROCCAN SARDINE FIP PREPARED FOR SEAFISH COMMON LANGUAGE GROUP...
Transcript of MOROCCAN SARDINE FIP - Seafish · MOROCCAN SARDINE FIP PREPARED FOR SEAFISH COMMON LANGUAGE GROUP...
LEADING AMBIENT FOOD SPECIALIST
MOROCCAN SARDINE FIP
PREPARED FOR SEAFISH COMMON LANGUAGE GROUP BY CAITLIN SCHINDLER, YOUSSEF JARIDI, JO GASCOIGNE 29/10/15
AGENDA
• Identifying a Need for Improvement
• Setting Up a Fishery Improvement Plan • Progress & Successes
₋ MSC Benchmarking Tool
• Next Steps
2
IDENTIFYING A NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT
• Increased demand for sustainably caught fish
• Little information on practices in the Moroccan fishery
• Limited options: MSC or non-MSC sardines
• Committed to improving the Moroccan fishery
Review the situation
Identification of sustainability risk
Commitment to improvement
Met with suppliers
Consulted with SFP
Attended a roundtable
Found Partners
Convened Meeting in Morocco
THE BEGINNING
FIP Organisation
FIP Workplan
Began March 2014
FIP Workplan
FIP Website
FIP website: http://fisheryimprovementprojects.org/fip/Moroccan-sardine-2/
Fishery Improvement Stages and Indicators
We are here
• Scientific observers on Moroccan RSW trawlers to evaluate
discards and interactions with ETP species
• Conversation started with government about need for a
more robust harvest control rule
• Exponential improvement in communication and trust
between industry and government
PROGRESS THUS FAR
• Preliminary data on discards and ETP species suggest that
the fishery is clean (sampling is ongoing)
• The need to improve the management plans for each zone is
understood; this is complex because it is a mixed fishery
• The government is much more willing to communicate its
activities and problems to the industry (and the outside
world – new INRH website)
SUCCESSES
• Improvements clearly visible from first pre-assessment (2010) to updated pre-assessment (this project; 2014) to FIP implementation (June 2015)
• Key outstanding issues:
• management of mixed small pelagic fishery (particularly sardinella – depleted) and harvest control rule
• more observer data for ETP species
• impacts of fishery on ecosystem (maintaining all stocks at target levels)
• transparent decision-making
MSC BENCHMARKING TOOL
MSC BENCHMARKING TOOL Principle Component PI Performance Indicator
Pre-assessment
2009 Updated
2014
Calc
Expected end 2015
Expected end 2016
Expected end 2017
Calc
Actual May 2015
Status
1.1.1 Stock status ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target1.1.2 Reference points ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target1.1.3 Stock rebuilding --- --- --- --- --- ---1.2.1 Harvest Strategy 60-79 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target1.2.2 Harvest control rules and tools 60-79 60-79 60-79 ≥80 ≥80 60-79 On Target1.2.3 Information and monitoring ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target1.2.4 Assessment of stock status ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target2.1.1 Outcome <60 <60 <60 60-79 60-79 <60 On Target2.1.2 Management ≥80 <60 <60 60-79 ≥80 <60 On Target2.1.3 Information <60 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target2.2.1 Outcome <60 <60 <60 <60 60-79 ≥80 Ahead2.2.2 Management <60 <60 <60 60-79 ≥80 ≥80 Ahead2.2.3 Information <60 <60 60-79 60-79 ≥80 ≥80 Ahead2.3.1 Outcome 60-79 <60 <60 <60 60-79 60-79 Ahead2.3.2 Management <60 60-79 60-79 60-79 ≥80 60-79 On Target2.3.3 Information <60 <60 60-79 60-79 ≥80 60-79 Ahead2.4.1 Outcome 60-79 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target2.4.2 Management ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target2.4.3 Information <60 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target2.5.1 Outcome ≥80 60-79 60-79 60-79 60-79 60-79 On Target2.5.2 Management 60-79 60-79 60-79 60-79 ≥80 60-79 On Target2.5.3 Information 60-79 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target3.1.1 Legal and customary framework 60-79 60-79 60-79 ≥80 ≥80 60-79 On Target3.1.2 Consultation, roles and responsibilities ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target3.1.3 Long term objectives ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target3.1.4 Incentives for sustainable fishing ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target3.2.1 Fishery specific objectives 60-79 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target3.2.2 Decision making processes 60-79 60-79 60-79 ≥80 ≥80 60-79 On Target3.2.3 Compliance and enforcement <60 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target3.2.4 Research plan ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target3.2.5 Management performance evaluation <60 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 ≥80 On Target
10 7 5 2 0 29 6 8 8 4 8
11 17 17 20 26 200.52 0.67 0.70 0.80 0.93 0.80
Total number of PIs equal to or greater than 80Overall BMT Index
Ecosystem
3
Governance and Policy
Fishery specific management
system
Total number of PIs less than 60Total number of PIs 60-79
2
Managed species
Unmanaged species
ETP species
Habitats
1
Outcome
Management
NEXT STEPS
• Continue to sample discards and ETP interactions
• Continue to lobby for improved harvest control rule (for all species) and explain MSC requirements
₋ Presentation from French MSC-certified sardine fishery planned for January who dealt with same issue
• Continue to build connections and facilitate communication
• Working to bring more vessel owners into the FIP