Monthly and seasonal weather - umanitoba.ca · 2020. 3. 2. · Introduction • The Canadian...
Transcript of Monthly and seasonal weather - umanitoba.ca · 2020. 3. 2. · Introduction • The Canadian...
Richard Moffet(2) ,Normand Gagnon(1)and Juan Fontecilla(1) Canadian Meteorological Centre, development (1) and operations(2) divisions, Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada Dorval, Québec
Monthly and seasonal weather - Is it
predictable? (Ensemble forecasting at the
Canadian Meteorological Centre)
Weather forecasting and uncertainty
Ensemble prediction system
Seasonal (up to 120 days) MAIN TOPIC
Canadian EPS and NAEFS
Products
Summary: web links
Outline
Principles of Numerical Weather Prediction
OBSERVATIONS INITIALIZATION NUMERICAL
MODEL
Sampling of current state
of the atmosphere.
Processing data to
initialize models.
Projection forward
in time.
• Upper air soundings.
• Surface land stations.
• Ships / buoys.
• Aircraft observations.
• Satellite data.
• Quality control.
• Brings observed
atmospheric variables
onto model grid.
• Provides forecast
atmospheric variables on
model grid.
Trial field
Models are improving!
T. Robinson, CMC
~11 years ~11 years
48-h gain in
predictability in 22 years
But still one big problem: “chaos”
120-h integration – mean sea level pressure
Two integrations done with identical NWP models but on different computers
M. Lajoie, CMC
Bit Flip
• Test of model sensitivity via minor changes
• The last bit of dynamical fields (HU,ES,VT,TT,UU et VV) switched
from 1 to 0 and vice-versa. The flip is done on all levels and at all 10
points in latitude and longitude.
2 runs on NAOS
(RUN PAR) - ( RUN with BIT FLIP)
240h, GZ 500 mb Up to 24 mb at surface and et 28 dm GZ at 500mb
Principles of NWP – modeling Primitive equations
spp
xs
Vd Fx
pTR
xfv
x
uu
t
u
ln
ys
Vd Fy
pTR
yfu
y
vv
t
v
ln
0
VdTRHydrostatic
Momentum
Ts
p
VdV Fdt
pd
dt
d
C
TR
dt
dT
ln1
qs F
dt
dqV
dt
Pd ; 0
ln
RTp
Continuity
Thermodynamics
State 0 at T and 1
u
tu
u
x
Sources of error create uncertainties in
initial conditions and then in forecasts
OBSERVATIONS INITIALIZATION
NUMERICAL
MODEL
Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty
Sampling of current state
of the atmosphere
Processing data to
initialize models
Projection forward
in time
Trial field
Then comes… Ensemble forecasting
Initial states Final states
True initial state True final state
Climatology
Ensemble
mean
Analysis
Deterministic
forecast
Uncertainty on
initial state
R. Verret, N. Gagnon, CMC
Atmospheric Ensemble forecasting
basics
• An Ensemble Prediction System is a set
of integrations of one or several NWP
models that differ in their initial states
(and sometimes in their configurations
and boundary conditions).
• Ensemble prediction is an attempt to
estimate the non-linear time evolution of
the forecast error probability distribution
function.
• With Ensemble forecast, it is possible
to evaluate, express and forecast
uncertainty.
Context
• Common usages of Ensemble forecasts:
– Ensemble mean as a substitute for a single deterministic
forecast.
– Clustering to produce a small set of forecast states
characterized with the cluster mean.
– A priori prediction of forecast skill.
– Ensemble probability distribution function.
– Measure of uncertainty.
– Extension of forecast range.
Monthly and seasonal forecast system
Introduction
• The Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) is producing seasonal forecasts in operational mode since September 1995.
• Seasonal forecasts are purely objective and automated.
• Seasonal forecasts provide three-month (90-day) temperature and precipitation anomaly outlooks in a priori three equally probable categories “above normal”, “near normal” and “below normal”.
• Twelve three-month seasons:
• Dynamical models are used for season 1 with zero and one month lead time.
• A statistical model is used for seasons 2, 3 and 4 with 3, 6 and 9 months lead time respectively.
• The set-up for season 1 is also used for monthly temperature anomaly forecasts issued on the 1st and 15th days of each month.
DJF JFM FMA MAM AMJ MJJ
JJA JAS ASO SON OND NDJ
Current system:
• Dynamical models used for season 1.
– Forecasts are issued on the first day of each month (12
seasons).
– GEMCLIM: 1.875 50 levels ptop 5mb
– GCM2: T32 10 levels ptop 10 mb
– GCM3: T63 32 levels ptop 5 mb
– SEF: T95 27 levels ptop 10 mb
• Historical forecasts (HFP2):
– 41 years (1969-2010).
Current seasonal forecasting set-
up: overview
Four models
GEM + GCM2
+ GCM3 + SEF
ICE
GEM
SEF
GCM3
GCM2
CMC analysis relaxed to
climatology during first 15 days
(GCM2 is a step function)
SNOW
SEF
CMC analysis relaxed to
climatology during first 15
days
GEM
GCM2
GCM3
prognostic variable
SST
last 30-day anomaly
persisted throughout
J0-9 J0-8
J0-7 J0-6
J0-5 J0-4
J0-3 J0-2
J0-1 J0
J0-9 J0-8
J0-7 J0-6
J0-5 J0-4
J0-3 J0-2
J0-1 J0
J0-9 J0-8
J0-7 J0-6
J0-5 J0-4
J0-3 J0-2
J0-1 J0
GEM
GCM2
J0-9 J0-8
J0-7 J0-6
J0-5 J0-4
J0-3 J0-2
J0-1 J0
GCM3
SEF
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 2 runs per day (00 and 12 UTC)
Current seasonal forecasting set-
up: overview
• Four-month integrations:
– Zero lead time forecasts.
– One-month lead time forecasts.
10 lagged runs of
GEM + GCM2 + GCM3 + SEF 40 member
ensemble
Mth 0 Mth 3 Mth 1 Mth 2 Mth 4
Monthly forecast
Monthly forecast at mid-month
Seasonal forecast 0
month lead time
Seasonal forecast one month lead
time
Forecast periods
Anomalies classified into three equally probable categories using 0.43
for temperature anomaly and 0.43 for precipitation anomaly.
20001971
T
20001971
P
Current seasonal forecasting set-up:
deterministic forecasts
2000-1971
SEF ,
20001971
SEF
20001971
SEF
20001971
GCM3 ,
20001971
GCM3
runs 10
GCM3
2000-1971
GCM2 ,
20001971
GCM2
runs 10
GCM2
2000-1971
GEM ,
20001971
GEM
runs 10
GEM
forecastanomaly 4
1
TT
TT
TTTT
TTTT
T
2000-1971
SEF ,
20001971
SEF
20001971
SEF
20001971
GCM3 ,
20001971
GCM3
runs 10
GCM3
2000-1971
GCM2 ,
20001971
GCM2
runs 10
GCM2
2000-1971
GEM ,
20001971
GEM
runs 10
GEM
forecastanomaly 4
1
PP
PP
PPPP
PPPP
P
Class thresholds
normalabove0.43
normal0.430.43
normalbelow0.43
TT
TTT
TT
APCC (Asia Pacific Climate Center) outlook
Pcpn Thresholds
Current seasonal forecasting set-up:
probabilistic forecasts
• To generate probabilistic forecasts:
– Calculate forecast anomaly for each member of the ensemble
using each model’s own climatology
– Classify the forecast anomalies into three equally probable
categories using 0.43 as threshold (above, normal, below)
– Count the number of members in each category
– Divide by the total number of members (40) and multiply by 100
Probabilistic forecasts for:
Above
Normal
Below
Probabilic forecasts
Reliability
Historical Percent Correct
Reliability Diagram
Temperature
Historical Percent Correct
Reliability Diagram
Precipitation
For seasons 2-3-4: Canonical Correlation
Analysis (CCA)
• Purely statistical
• Based on sea surface temperature anomalies and ortho-
normal empirical functions.
• Under revision and improvement
Verification
• Deterministic scores
– Correlation
– Percent correct
• Probabilistic scores
– Reliability
– Sharpness
– ROC
A look back at summer 2010
Summer 2010
Since the summer of 1992, every summer season has seen above normal
Summer 2010
Explaining the present forecast
• La Nina winter…and spring…
500 hPa circulation: La Nina winters
La Nina years: winter,trend removed
La Nina: winter with trend
Strong La Nina: winter T anomalies
La Ninayaers: winter:pcpn
Spring La Nina : trend removed
Spring La Nina: with trend
Spring La Nina years: pcpn
What else?
CEPS/NAEFS
MSC Ensemble Prediction System ( planned to be
used for monthly forecast in the next year)
• Members:
– 20+1 members:
– GEM 0.9° (~100 km resolution) L28 (forecast), L58(analyses).
– 16-day integration.
– Twice a day (00 and 12 UTC).
• Simulation of initial condition uncertainties:
– ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation with perturbed observations.
• Simulation of model uncertainties:
– A multi-model approach, each member having its own physics
parameterization.
– Stochastic perturbations added to tendencies in the parameterized
physical processes.
– Stochastic kinetic energy back-scattering scheme to re-introduce
dissipated energy.
current – As of May 2010
Current parameterizations used in
global MSC EPS
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Back-
scattering
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
std
GWD
0.85
1.0
0.85
0.85
1.0
1.0
0.85
0.85
1.0
1.0
0.85
0.85
1.0
0.85
1.0
1.0
0.85
0.85
1.0
1.0
1.0
Vertical
mixing
parameter
No Bougeault ISBA Kain & Fritsch 0
Stochastic
Physics
Mixing length Land surface scheme Deep convection #
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Bougeault
Bougeault
Blackadar
Bougeault
Blackadar
ISBA
Force-restore
ISBA
ISBA
Force-restore
Relaxed Arakawa Schubert
Kuo Symmetric
Kain & Fritsch
Oldkuo
Relaxed Arakawa Schubert
16
17
18
19
20
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Blackadar
Bougeault
Blackadar
Bougeault
Blackadar
Force-restore
Force-restore
Force-restore
Force-restore
ISBA
Relaxed Arakawa Schubert
Kuo Symmetric
Oldkuo
Kain & Fritsch
Kuo Symmetric
11
12
13
14
15
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Blackadar
Bougeault
Blackadar
Blackadar
Bougeault
Force-restore
ISBA
ISBA
ISBA
ISBA
Kain & Fritsch
Kuo Symmetric
Relaxed Arakawa Schubert
Kain & Fritsch
Oldkuo
6
7
8
9
10
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Bougeault
Blackadar
Bougeault
Blackadar
Bougeault
ISBA
ISBA
Force-restore
Force-restore
Force-restore
Kain & Fritsch
Oldkuo
Relaxed Arakawa Schubert
Kuo Symmetric
Oldkuo
1
2
3
4
5
From P. Houtekamer, ARMA
NAEFS
• Global ensembles: – NOAA, MSC, NMS of Mexico: official agreement signed in
November 2004.
– FNMOC (US NAVY) may join NAEFS in 2010.
• Advantages: – Larger ensemble allowing better PDF definitions (super-ensemble).
– Improved probabilistic forecast performance.
– Seamless suite of forecast products across international boundaries and across different time ranges (1-14 days).
– Minimal additional costs – levering computational resources.
– Synergy with NCEP on R&D work.
• Problems: – Combination of multi-model ensembles into a super-ensemble.
– Real time exchange (operational considerations).
NAEFS
• Raw data exchange (00 and 12 UTC runs).
– ~ 50 selected variables.
– 6-hourly output frequency over 16 days.
– GRIB format.
• Basic products:
– Using same algorithms/codes.
– Bias correction algorithm.
– Forecast products in terms of climatological anomalies.
– Week 2 (days 8 to 14) forecasts based on the combined MSC/NCEP ensembles.
Produced with
EPS forecasts!
MSC official Forecasts for days 6 and 7
From Canadian EPS system only
More for my mother …
Forecast confidence
• The spread-skill relationship can be used to assess
forecast confidence.
• Forecast is incomplete without information on
expected flow dependent skill.
Probabilistic forecasts • Evaluation of possible scenarios.
• EPS outputs downscaling application models
• Construction of pdf from a finite ensemble.
• Can be used to extend forecast range beyond day 5.
For you, decision makers…
Risk management • Probabilities of event occurrences.
• Risk calculation.
Decision making • Decision making based on probabilities and
cost/loss ratio.
Mean and standard deviation maps
Meteograms
Probability maps
% of getting > 10 mm of rain over 6 days
Done by member counting
Access to digital data
• Currently available global data on grid :
http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/grib/Low-resolution_GRIB_e.html
• And on our datamart:
– Raw model outputs on a higher resolution grids in GRIB2 format,
– Values at points (cities) in XML format: meteograms (soon)
http://dd.meteo.ec.gc.ca/ensemble/
http://www.ec.gc.ca/meteo-weather/default.asp?lang=En&n=136568DB-1
http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/saisons/index_e.html
http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/ensemble/naefs/index_e.html
http://www.meteo.gc.ca/ensemble/index_e.html
http://www.ec.gc.ca/adsc-cmda/default.asp?lang=En&n=30EDCA67-1
http://www.ec.gc.ca/adsc-cmda/default.asp?lang=En&n=98231106-0
Thank you! Merci!