Monte Carlo Simulation and Personal Finance Jacob Foley.
-
Upload
osborne-webb -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Monte Carlo Simulation and Personal Finance Jacob Foley.
Monte Carlo Simulation Monte Carlo Simulation and Personal Financeand Personal Finance
Jacob FoleyJacob Foley
Background on myselfBackground on myself
I work at Stephens Financial Partners I work at Stephens Financial Partners as a Financial Advisoras a Financial Advisor
Monte Carlo simulations are the most Monte Carlo simulations are the most popular simulations used by advisorspopular simulations used by advisors
These simulations failed after the These simulations failed after the 2008 market collapse2008 market collapse
Where did it come from?Where did it come from?
John von Neumann and Stanislaw John von Neumann and Stanislaw Ulam Ulam
Los Alamos Scientific LaboratoryLos Alamos Scientific Laboratory
Studying radiation shieldingStudying radiation shielding
Why call it Monte Carlo?Why call it Monte Carlo?
Neuman and Ulam’s work had to be Neuman and Ulam’s work had to be kept a secret because it was part of kept a secret because it was part of the Manhattan Projectthe Manhattan Project
Von Neuman chose the name "Monte Von Neuman chose the name "Monte Carlo". Carlo".
What is it?What is it?
Class of computational algorithmsClass of computational algorithms Used to solve large systemsUsed to solve large systems Used when it is unfeasible or Used when it is unfeasible or
impossible to compute an exact impossible to compute an exact resultresult
Basic Principle of the Monte Carlo Basic Principle of the Monte Carlo Method.Method.
The Task: Calculate a number The Task: Calculate a number I I (one (one number only. Not an entire functional number only. Not an entire functional dependence)dependence)
Example: Calculate piExample: Calculate pi Numerically: look for an appropriate Numerically: look for an appropriate
convergent series and evaluate this convergent series and evaluate this approximatelyapproximately
Monte Carlo: look for a stochastic model: Monte Carlo: look for a stochastic model: probability space with random variableprobability space with random variable
What makes a method a Monte What makes a method a Monte Carlo Method?Carlo Method?
Define a domain of possible inputs. Define a domain of possible inputs. Generate inputs randomly from the Generate inputs randomly from the
domain using a certain specified domain using a certain specified probability distribution. probability distribution.
Perform a deterministic computation Perform a deterministic computation using the inputs. using the inputs.
Aggregate the results of the individual Aggregate the results of the individual computations into the final result computations into the final result
Random NumbersRandom Numbers
Uniform DistributionUniform Distribution The random variable X is uniformly The random variable X is uniformly
distributed on the interval [a, b]distributed on the interval [a, b]
Dull Monte CarloDull Monte Carlo
““hit or miss”hit or miss” Take a sample point Take a sample point The point has two outcomesThe point has two outcomes
True (“hit”)True (“hit”) False (“miss”)False (“miss”)
Total number of hits and divide it by the Total number of hits and divide it by the total trialstotal trials
Crude Monte CarloCrude Monte Carlo
Write the integral such that Write the integral such that I I becomes the mean value of a becomes the mean value of a random variable.random variable.
Purposes we generate Purposes we generate BB numbers numbers Uniformly distributed from (0,1)Uniformly distributed from (0,1) Then take their averageThen take their average
Take Numerical Analysis Take Numerical Analysis
Professor Robert LewisProfessor Robert Lewis
Math 413 and 414Math 413 and 414
Applications in the Real WorldApplications in the Real World
Physical sciencesPhysical sciences Design and visualsDesign and visuals TelecommunicationsTelecommunications GamesGames Finance and businessFinance and business
Monte Carlo in FinanceMonte Carlo in Finance
First Introduced in 1964First Introduced in 1964
““Risk Analysis in Capital Investment”Risk Analysis in Capital Investment” David B HertzDavid B Hertz Harvard Business Review Article Harvard Business Review Article
So how does Monte Carlo apply to So how does Monte Carlo apply to Finance?Finance?
Used to value and analyzeUsed to value and analyze InstrumentsInstruments OptionsOptions PortfoliosPortfolios InvestmentsInvestments
How does it predict values?How does it predict values?
For each SimulationFor each Simulation The behavior of the factors impacting the The behavior of the factors impacting the
component instrument is simulated over component instrument is simulated over timetime
The values of the instrument are calculatedThe values of the instrument are calculated The value is then observedThe value is then observed The various values are then combined in a The various values are then combined in a
histogram (i.e. the probability distribution)histogram (i.e. the probability distribution) The statistical characteristics are then The statistical characteristics are then
observedobserved
How is it used in financial planning?How is it used in financial planning?
Simulates the overall marketSimulates the overall market
Predicts the probability of reaching a Predicts the probability of reaching a target numbertarget number
Changes are made to reach the Changes are made to reach the target numbertarget number
What works with Monte Carlo?What works with Monte Carlo?
Forecasting EarningsForecasting Earnings
Modeling portfolio lossesModeling portfolio losses
Provides flexibilityProvides flexibility
What is wrong with Monte Carlo?What is wrong with Monte Carlo?
Assumes normal return distributionsAssumes normal return distributions We know from history that extreme We know from history that extreme
returns occur more frequently than returns occur more frequently than expectedexpected
Can’t predict every outcomeCan’t predict every outcome Most clients see the simulation run Most clients see the simulation run
through thousands of iterations and through thousands of iterations and believe that they have seen all possible believe that they have seen all possible outcomesoutcomes
What is wrong with Monte Carlo?What is wrong with Monte Carlo?
Does not measure bear markets wellDoes not measure bear markets well
Does not include the human factorDoes not include the human factor
What is wrong with Monte Carlo?What is wrong with Monte Carlo?
Does not recognize that portfolio Does not recognize that portfolio performance depends at least as performance depends at least as much on the sequence of the rate of much on the sequence of the rate of return that it does on the average of return that it does on the average of those returnsthose returns
What can we do better?What can we do better?
Let’s look at an exampleLet’s look at an example AssumptionsAssumptions
20 year period20 year period Individual that has just retired in 1988Individual that has just retired in 1988 Has $1,000,000 invested in DJIAHas $1,000,000 invested in DJIA Withdraws $50,000 each year that Withdraws $50,000 each year that
increases by 3% to compensate for increases by 3% to compensate for inflationinflation
1988 11.80% $1,118,000.00 $1,068,000.00 $50,000.00
1989 27.00% $1,356,360.00 $1,304,860.00 $51,500.00
1990 -4.30% $1,248,751.02 $1,195,706.02 $53,045.00
1991 20.30% $1,438,434.34 $1,383,797.99 $54,636.35
1992 4.20% $1,441,917.51 $1,385,642.07 $56,275.44
1993 13.70% $1,575,475.03 $1,517,511.33 $57,963.70
1994 2.10% $1,549,379.06 $1,489,676.45 $59,702.61
1995 33.50% $1,988,718.06 $1,927,224.37 $61,493.69
1996 26.00% $2,428,302.70 $2,364,964.20 $63,338.50
1997 22.60% $2,899,446.11 $2,834,207.45 $65,238.66
1998 16.10% $3,290,514.85 $3,223,319.03 $67,195.82
1999 25.20% $4,035,595.42 $3,966,383.73 $69,211.69
2000 -6.20% $3,720,467.94 $3,649,179.89 $71,288.04
2001 -7.10% $3,390,088.12 $3,316,661.44 $73,426.69
2002 -16.80% $2,759,462.31 $2,683,832.83 $75,629.49
2003 25.30% $3,362,842.53 $3,284,944.16 $77,898.37
2004 3.10% $3,386,777.43 $3,306,542.11 $80,235.32
2005 -0.60% $3,286,702.86 $3,204,060.48 $82,642.38
2006 16.30% $3,726,322.33 $3,641,200.68 $85,121.65
2007 6.80% $3,888,802.33 $3,801,127.02 $87,675.30
2008 -49.80% $1,908,165.77 $1,817,860.20 $90,305.56
1988 -49.80% $502,000.00 $452,000.00 $50,000.00
1989 6.80% $482,736.00 $431,236.00 $51,500.00
1990 16.30% $501,527.47 $448,482.47 $53,045.00
1991 -0.60% $445,791.57 $391,155.22 $54,636.35
1992 3.10% $403,281.04 $347,005.59 $56,275.44
1993 25.30% $434,798.01 $376,834.31 $57,963.70
1994 -16.80% $313,526.14 $253,823.53 $59,702.61
1995 -7.10% $235,802.06 $174,308.36 $61,493.69
1996 -6.20% $163,501.25 $100,162.74 $63,338.50
1997 25.20% $125,403.75 $60,165.09 $65,238.66
1998 16.10% $69,851.67 $2,655.85 $67,195.82
1999 22.60% $3,256.08 $65,955.62 $69,211.69
2000 26.00% $83,104.08 $154,392.12 $71,288.04
2001 33.50% $206,113.48 $279,540.17 $73,426.69
2002 2.10% $285,410.51 $361,040.00 $75,629.49
2003 13.70% $410,502.48 $488,400.85 $77,898.37
2004 4.20% $508,913.68 $589,149.00 $80,235.32
2005 20.30% $708,746.25 $791,388.63 $82,642.38
2006 -4.30% $757,358.92 $842,480.58 $85,121.65
2007 27.00% $1,069,950.33 $1,157,625.63 $87,675.30
2008 11.80% $1,294,225.46 $1,384,531.02 $90,305.56
1988 11.80% $1,118,000.00 $1,068,000.00 $50,000.00
1989 27.00% $1,356,360.00 $1,304,860.00 $51,500.00
1990 -4.30% $1,248,751.02 $1,195,706.02 $53,045.00
1991 20.30% $1,438,434.34 $1,438,434.34 $0.00
1992 4.20% $1,498,848.58 $1,423,219.09 $75,629.49
1993 13.70% $1,618,200.11 $1,540,301.74 $77,898.37
1994 2.10% $1,572,648.07 $1,492,412.75 $80,235.33
1995 33.50% $1,992,371.02 $1,909,728.63 $82,642.39
1996 26.00% $2,406,258.07 $2,321,136.42 $85,121.66
1997 22.60% $2,845,713.25 $2,758,037.94 $87,675.31
1998 16.10% $3,202,082.05 $3,111,776.48 $90,305.57
1999 25.20% $3,895,944.16 $3,802,929.42 $93,014.73
2000 -6.20% $3,567,147.80 $3,471,342.62 $95,805.18
2001 -7.10% $3,224,877.30 $3,224,877.30 $0.00
2002 -16.80% $2,683,097.91 $2,683,097.91 $0.00
2003 25.30% $3,361,921.68 $3,361,921.68 $0.00
2004 3.10% $3,466,141.25 $3,358,311.65 $107,829.60
2005 -0.60% $3,338,161.78 $3,227,097.30 $111,064.49
2006 16.30% $3,753,114.16 $3,753,114.16 $0.00
2007 6.80% $4,008,325.92 $3,890,497.62 $117,828.30
2008 -49.80% $1,953,029.80 $1,831,666.66 $121,363.15
1988 -49.80% $502,000.00 $452,000.00 $50,000.00
1989 6.80% $482,736.00 $482,736.00 $0.00
1990 16.30% $561,421.97 $508,376.97 $53,045.00
1991 -0.60% $505,326.71 $450,690.36 $54,636.35
1992 3.10% $464,661.76 $464,661.76 $0.00
1993 25.30% $582,221.18 $524,257.48 $57,963.70
1994 -16.80% $436,182.22 $376,479.61 $59,702.61
1995 -7.10% $349,749.56 $349,749.56 $0.00
1996 -6.20% $328,065.08 $328,065.08 $0.00
1997 25.20% $410,737.48 $410,737.48 $0.00
1998 16.10% $476,866.22 $386,851.49 $90,014.73
1999 22.60% $474,279.93 $381,564.75 $92,715.17
2000 26.00% $480,771.59 $385,274.96 $95,496.63
2001 33.50% $514,342.08 $415,980.55 $98,361.53
2002 2.10% $424,716.14 $349,086.65 $75,629.49
2003 13.70% $396,911.52 $319,013.15 $77,898.37
2004 4.20% $332,411.70 $252,176.37 $80,235.33
2005 20.30% $303,368.18 $220,725.79 $82,642.39
2006 -4.30% $211,234.58 $126,112.93 $85,121.66
2007 27.00% $160,163.42 $160,163.42 $0.00
2008 11.80% $179,062.70 $57,699.55 $121,363.15
Have multiple buckets of moneyHave multiple buckets of money
Don’t just have your money in the Don’t just have your money in the stock marketstock market
Have money growing outside of the Have money growing outside of the stock marketstock market