Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the...

133
Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented on the Pike’s Peak Highway Fourth Year Submitted by: James M. Nankervis Blue Mountain Consultants 2500 Front Range Ave Berthoud, CO 80513 Submitted to: METI Inc 8600 Boeing Drive El Paso, Texas 79925 February 20, 2006

Transcript of Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the...

Page 1: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Report on 2006 Field Season

Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented on the Pike’s Peak Highway

Fourth Year

Submitted by:

James M. Nankervis Blue Mountain Consultants

2500 Front Range Ave Berthoud, CO 80513

Submitted to:

METI Inc 8600 Boeing Drive

El Paso, Texas 79925

February 20, 2006

Page 2: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented
Page 3: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Executive Summary

Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented on the Pike’s Peak Highway

James M. Nankervis

This report describes the fourth year’s monitoring effort to determine effectiveness and validate response to road related mitigation practices implemented on the Pike’s Peak highway as part of the Settlement Agreement between the Sierra Club and the United States Department of Agriculture – Forest Service in Sierra Club v. Venneman, Civil Action No. 98-M-662 (D. Colo.). The effectiveness-monitoring plan has been designed to determine how well the mitigation practices implemented contribute to meeting their objectives and focuses on the 14 mile-long, 300 foot-wide highway corridor (150 feet each side of highway centerline) starting at mile marker 7 and continuing to the summit. Validation monitoring documents how the properly implemented intervention practices affect the riparian, wetland and aquatic system of catchments within the influence of the Pike’s Peak highway.

The objectives for the fourth year of monitoring were to re-measure the various features surveyed the first three years and to continue to locate, identify, and establish baseline surveys for sites not previously surveyed. Highway improvements continued in 2006 with less than one mile of highway being paved starting just below the switchbacks and ending above them near our site 115CC. This year, very little roadbase was added to the unimproved highway sections while most of the mitigation work focused on the paving through the switchbacks. There was an attempt to install rock weirs in this new section but these structures washed away and no new waypoints were added to the monitoring study.

Precipitation measurements at all gauges continued in 2006 and was the second full year for the Glen Cove snotel site. Seasonal precipitation totals for the period May through September were: 075RG = 9.61 inches, 076RG = 18.78 inches, 077RG = 15.54 inches with 21.6 inches recorded at the Glen snotel site. There appeared to be some tampering with 075RG early in the season which could explain the relatively low recorded total for the 2006 season.

Thirteen cut slope and 30 fill slopes sites were monitored in 2006. Each week, the silt fences were visited to determine if they needed cleaning, repair, or replacement. Sixty four times cut and fill slope silt fences required cleaning in 2006.

Re-surveys of the eleven road cross section sites were made in 2006. The survey of 156RX was made after that area was prepped for paving. Since it is now paved, this will be the last survey made at 156RX.

Re-surveys of nineteen drainage ditches were made in 2006. Site 092DD was paved in 2005 and was not re-surveyed this year. The survey of 107DD was made after that area

swinkler
Cross-Out
Page 4: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

was prepped for paving. Since it is now shot-creted, this will be the last survey made at 107DD.

There are 115 conveyance channels that have been identified and surveyed during the first 3 years of this monitoring effort. This year 29 of those conveyance channels have been resurveyed. These include conveyance channels below all rock weirs, seven channels that have been treated, and 6 channels that won’t be treated until the last phases of the road construction. The idea behind surveying these treated and untreated channels this year is to continuously monitor a sub-sample of conveyance channels rather than trying to continuously survey all 115.

Twenty one rock weirs were monitored in the 2006 to determine their effectiveness in trapping sediment both from winter and summer runoff. Early heavy snowfall prevented the September survey of 5 weirs, 181RW, 233RW, 234RW, 236RW, and 237RW. In the future, fall surveys of these features should start at the higher elevation structures and work downward. The large sediment ponds in Basin 2 and 3 (199RW and 237RW, respectively) were re-surveyed in the spring and fall to determine winter/summer contributions.

This year we selected to re-survey North Catamount Creek, North Fork Crystal Creek, and Severy Creek. While it’s probably not necessary to survey every stream every year, it is reasonable to survey at least one control and one impacted stream each year. We also chose to survey North Fork Crystal Creek because of the work the Rocky Mountain Field Institute was doing in the conveyance channels above both stream reaches.

Changes have been made in the reporting requirements for this document. Beyond reducing the data to a “usable” form, this report merely summarizes what was done in 2006 and makes no attempt to analyze or compare the data. Any individual utilizing these data bears the sole responsibility for its accuracy and conclusions drawn.

Included with this report are two data DVD’s containing all survey data (field and post processing) plus digital photographs (recommended viewing) for all sites.

4

Page 5: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Acknowledgements Many thanks go out to all the people and agencies that cooperated in this effort, and there were quite a few. Special thanks go out to the US Forest Service’s Pike’s Peak Ranger District, Rocky Mountain Research Station and Manitou Experimental Forest personnel for all the logistical, technical, laboratory and financial assistance. Also, to the City of Colorado Springs and the Pike’s Peak Highway crew who shared their invaluable knowledge of the highway and their time. My personal thanks go to METI Inc., the US Forest Service Inventory and Monitoring Institute, Black Creek Hydrology, LLC, Levi Howell and Brenda Waddell for a successful fourth year.

Page 6: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented
Page 7: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Introduction This report describes the fourth year’s monitoring effort to determine effectiveness of road restoration practices and to validate response to road related mitigation practices implemented on the Pike’s Peak highway as part of the Settlement Agreement between the Sierra Club and the United States Department of Agriculture – Forest Service in Sierra Club v. Venneman, Civil Action No. 98-M-662 (D. Colo.). The five major objectives of the road mitigation work are to:

• Stabilize road surface materials, cut slopes and fill slopes • Reduce runoff velocities and dissipate erosive energy • Collect runoff in armored ditches and conveyance channels • Reduce erosion and sediment deposition in drainage channels • Retain sediment in traps and ponds to reduce downstream sedimentation.

The effectiveness-monitoring plan was designed to determine how well the implemented mitigation practices contribute to meeting these objectives and focuses on the 14 mile-long, 300 foot-wide highway corridor (150 feet each side of the highway centerline) starting at mile marker seven and continuing to the summit. Validation monitoring documents how the properly implemented intervention practices affect the riparian, wetland and aquatic system of catchments within the influence of the Pike’s Peak highway. The objectives in the fourth year of monitoring were to re-measure sites established in prior years. The monitoring plan calls for replicating “like” conditions for each feature measured, whether they’re treated or untreated, control or impacted. Comparisons made, over time, of the relative change observed within a particular treatment type or control, against the relative change observed between treatment types will allow for separation of natural (expected) change from change observed as a result of some disturbance or treatment. What follows in this report is simply a description of the monitoring effort in 2006 and a presentation of the data collected without any comparative analysis. Site Location and Identification A proposed 15 year monitoring study not only requires the initial identification of suitable sites, but the ability to relocate them, as well. Location of each cut and fill slope, road cross section, conveyance channel and drainage ditch, rock weir and sediment trap, precipitation gauge, and stream site were identified as a waypoint using a handheld Garmin ETrex Vista Global Positioning unit (GPS) which recorded latitude, longitude, and altitude. Each waypoint was given a unique code to distinguish it in the field as well as provide an easy identifier for post processing convenience. The naming convention used for the effectiveness monitoring was a 5 character alpha-numeric code starting with three digits followed by two letters (e.g. 001RW, 007FS, etc.) where the numbers are sequential and the letters signify feature type (CS = Cut Slope, RX = Road Cross Section, etc.). The validation monitoring sites use a similar five character naming convention

Page 8: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

except the first four letters identify the stream and the last digit signifies the reach (e.g. OILC1 = Oil Creek, Reach 1; SVRY2 = Severy Creek, Reach 2; etc.). Appendix A has a complete listing of all the sites including Site ID, Latitude, Longitude, Altitude, and Feature Description. It should be noted that while GPS technology is very good, accuracy is still dependent upon the available satellite constellation at the specific time of need and these coordinates should get one reasonably close to the desired feature but not necessarily to within one foot of a control point. Every site has at least three Temporary Bench Marks (TBM’s) or control points for use as relative reference points in order to repeatedly complete spatially similar three dimensional surveys. The TBM’s consist of three foot lengths of 0.5 inch rebar pounded into the ground and topped with plastic yellow caps. Aluminum nursery tags wired to the rebar identify the individual TBM’s. Sites close in proximity may share TBM’s so that every site may not have three unique control points, but every site has at least three points with which to register the survey. We began to establish a highway control point map that spatially ties all of the effectiveness monitoring sites into the Knight-Piesold highway survey. As of September 2005, we had completed the traverse of the highway in the subalpine zone. Coordinates for all sites are self contained within each survey job however, some of the sites have been adjusted to the Knight-Piesold survey coordinates while others still contain arbitrary coordinates. This does not affect the accuracy of any survey. Data Data loggers and digital cameras make it easy to collect large quantities of data in a relatively short amount of time. It is not the intent of this report to produce hardcopy reproductions of every piece of data or image collected to date. Instead, pertinent and/or interesting examples will be presented in the body of this report while all relevant figures, tables, and charts will be contained in an appendix. All the data is available on 2 DVD’s so that interested parties might have access to it. Data on the DVD’s is organized in hierarchical directories by monitoring type (effective or validation), by site or feature type, and by photo or survey type. File types encountered in the survey data include MS Excel 2002, Trimble Geomatics Office (TGO) 1.63, AutoDesks AutoCad 2004, and text files. Precipitation data was collected with a HOBO data logger and converted to MS Excel 2002 files. The TGO software is based on MS Access 2000 with surveying applications built in so if you have MS Access (or MS Excel) you do not need TGO to be able to read the raw survey data files. All photos are formatted as .jpg files and can be read by most operating systems. Photograph location is defined by the directory it is located in (e.g. 102CS_06292005 contains photos of cut slope ID number 102CS taken on June 29, 2005.). Please note that cross section photos in the validation monitoring section have a photo board in them identifying cross section and bank (e.g. AL on the photo board denotes Cross Section A, Left Bank; BR denotes Cross Section B, Right Bank; etc.).

8

Page 9: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Effectiveness Monitoring The objective of effectiveness monitoring is to assess the effectiveness of the intervention techniques in meeting their intended purpose. By installing silt fences on cut and fill slopes, permanent cross sections on drainage ditches, conveyance channels, and road surfaces and establishing baseline surveys of sediment traps, we hope to document , over time, the direct effects of the various mitigation practices implemented to stabilize those features. Precipitation Gauges Three Onset tipping bucket rain gauges with HOBO event data loggers were installed at approximate elevations of 10,000, 11,500, and 13,000 feet a.s.l. to index precipitation over the elevational range of the highway. Each gauge was mounted on top of a pressure treated six foot 4”x 4” post buried two feet into the ground. Hose clamps and silicone caulk were used to secure the gauges to the post, plumb and level. Rain gauge 075RG was located just uphill from the Halfway Picnic point near mile marker ten which is at the upper end of Priority Basin 2, in the subalpine zone. Rain gauge 076RG was located near the Severy Creek trailhead at the transition between the subalpine and the alpine zones. Rain gauge 077RG was located near the Devil’s Playground well into the alpine. Table 1 contains the specific coordinates and precipitation totals for each gauge plus the totals for the NRCS Snotel site at Glenn Cove (data for Glen Cove site can be obtained from:

http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/snotel/snotel.pl?sitenum=1057&state=co). The Snotel site is spatially located between rain gauges 075RG and 076RG. Table 1. Location, precipitation accumulation, and dates of operation for 3 rain gauges.

Gauge ID

Latitude (hddd°mm.mmm)

Longitude (hddd°mm.mmm)

Altitude (ft)

Total (in)

Dates of Operation - 2005

075RG N38 53.797 W105 03.890 10,109 9.61 5/01 – 9/27 05L11s N38.87583 W105.073667 11,460 21.60 5/01 – 9/30 076RG N38 52.582 W105 03.970 11,810 18.78 5/01 – 9/27 077RG N38 51.783 W105 03.999 13,069 15.54 5/01 – 9/27 The data loggers record a date-time stamp for each tip of the rain gauge bucket (1 tip = 0.01 inches) from which volume, duration, and intensity (or rate) of each storm event can be determined. These data can be found on the accompanying data DVD’s and have been converted to MS Excel format for ease of access. Cut and Fill Slopes Stability on cut and fill slopes, and erosion reduction, may be achieved by reestablishing natural vegetation or through the use of geo-synthetic erosion control netting to “armor” the slopes, or by installing various types of structures to keep storm drainage off the slopes entirely. The best monitoring approach is to determine the effectiveness of these practices in reducing cut and fill slope erosion and subsequent sediment transport. Silt

9

Page 10: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

fencing installed at the base of the cut or fill slope captures the sediment eroded from the slope. Comparing the rate of eroded material being trapped, over time, at the base of treated and untreated cut and fill slopes is the best measure of the effectiveness of the mitigation practice in reducing erosion. In 2006, thirteen cut slope and 29 fill slope sites were monitored for stability using silt fences to capture eroding material as described by Nankervis (2004). In 2005, we began using graduated buckets to measure volume of material captured by the silt fences. This reduces field surveying time and eliminates the need for data reduction in the office as material is measured directly as it is excavated (Figure 1). An added benefit of this technique is that it can potentially increase sampling frequency as small amounts of material can be measured more efficiently with the bucket than with the survey method. Once again, for the most part, all the silt fences remained intact and functional and only required minimal maintenance or repair. Photographs of all sites are on the data DVD’s.

Figure 1. Graduated buckets used to measure excavated material from silt fence sites. Cut Slopes A summary of the 2006 cut slope monitoring site survey dates and sediment accumulation is presented in Appendix B. No cut slope sites are located in the section of highway treated in 2006. Initial visits of the cut slope sites occurred from May through June where fences were excavated and repaired or replaced as needed. For the remainder

10

Page 11: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

of the field season, cut slope sites were visited on a weekly basis and excavated when sediment accumulated. Fill Slopes A summary of the 2006 fill slope monitoring site survey dates and sediment accumulation is presented in Appendix C. One fill slope site, 101FS, is located in the section of highway treated in 2006 and now has road pavement and a shot-crete ditch above it. Initial visits of the fill slope sites occurred from May through June where fences were excavated and repaired or replaced as needed. For the remainder of the field season, fill slope sites were visited on a weekly basis and excavated when sediment accumulated. Highway Surface Stabilization Initially, this phase of the monitoring plan was going to look at the effectiveness of several different kinds of treatments with respect to stabilizing the road surface. Since road stabilization has been narrowed down to one option (paving with asphalt) there was little need to implement a study design matrix containing one treatment. However, we did measure several sites in unpaved reaches of the road and stratified these reaches by slope; less than 10% and greater than 10% road slope. Table 2 lists the sites, Priority Basins and survey dates of all road cross section measured in 2006. Note that 154RX was surveyed after being prepared for paving, and was eventually paved in 2006, so this will be the last survey of this site. The amount of road base applied to the highway in 2006 has not been reported yet but Jack Glavan (Capital Improvements Manager Pikes Peak Highway for the City of Colorado Springs, personal communication) indicated that very little road base was applied to the highway sections not paved in 2006. Table 2. Summary of road cross section monitoring sites measured in 2006.

Site ID Basin Slope Category Slope Survey Date 044RX 7 Class 1 0.0751 June 15 047RX 7 Class 2 0.1007 June 15 050RX 7 Class 2 0.1038 June 22 056RX 7 Class 2 0.1049 June 22 060RX* 7 Class 2 0.1006 June 14 062RX 7 Class 1 0.0971 June 14 072RX 7 Class 1 0.0966 June 28

154RX** 3 Class 2 0.1032 June 28 156RX 6 Class 2 0.1022 June 21 158RX 6 Class 1 0.0483 June 21 160RX 6 Class 1 0.0268 June 28

*Only road reach without a corresponding drainage ditch survey **Surveyed post-paving preparation. This cross section was paved in 2006. Five cross sections (labeled A-E) were resurveyed for each road reach. Like all other sites in this study, we used a resection to locate the survey instrument relative to the previously established permanent monuments to insure measuring the same cross section as in the prior survey. The same protocol is used to measure all cross sections, regardless of monitoring site, in this study. A tape stretched between end points guides the surveyor as

11

Page 12: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

they measure cross section topography moving left to right (facing down slope). Each road cross section was measured from the edge of the drainage ditch to the edge of the fill slope. All cross sections surveyed with a total station in this monitoring study have a correction applied to the coordinates to align all points in the cross section to the left pin-right pin vector (i.e. cross section end points). Even though we use a tag line between the end points to guide the cross section survey, directly positioning the prism over the tape for each and every shot is impossible and so by correcting the northing and easting coordinates of each internal cross section shot to match the vector between the left and right end pins, we get a true measure of distance. This correction typically is very small but is necessary when comparing measurements over time. With the arbitrary end point elevations and vector corrections, graphs of all road cross sections were made. Appendix D contains graphs for each reach of the surveys done this year. Photographs and survey data for all sites are on the data DVD’s. Armoring Drainage Channels The effectiveness monitoring for this phase focuses on measuring cross sections in roadside drainage ditches and conveyance channels to determine if the implemented mitigation practices reduce erosion and deposition in these features. The current mitigation treatments differ from what was initially planned. For example, instead of armoring drainage ditches, all reaches except those meeting the criteria stated in the latest Forest Service Design Review (Burke 2002) will be lined with shot-crete, which in Basins 2 and 3 is virtually the entire length of the road. We would expect little deposition and no erosion in ditches lined with shot-crete, so post-construction monitoring will be limited to ditches lined with erosion control fabric or ditches left untreated. Instead of relying solely on energy dissipating devices for erosion control in conveyance channels, where possible, completely removing the energy from the conveyance channels, as in Basin 2, is preferred. Drainage Ditches A summary of the 19 drainage ditch monitoring sites surveyed in 2006 are listed in Table 3. Sixteen of the sites were established in 2003 and 4 more sites in Basin 2 were established in 2004. Ten of the sites are associated with some treatment; the six ditches in Basins 1 and 2 are lined with erosion control blankets and are the only drainage ditches in these basins not lined with shot-crete. Three ditches in Basin 7 are adjacent to road surfaces paved with recycled asphalt but have no other treatment applied to the ditch. A fourth ditch, 092DD, was shot-creted as part of the 1.8 miles of highway improvement in 2005. For 107DD, the 2006 survey was done after the ditch was graded and prepped for shot-crete. This will be the last survey for 107DD. The ditches in Basin 7 will provide the longest measure of erosion as Basin 7 is currently the last basin scheduled for construction (USDA Forest Service 2000).

12

Page 13: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Similar to the road cross section surveys, there are five cross sections (labeled A-E) per drainage ditch monitoring site. The cross section end points are monumented on the cut slope side with rebar and on the road side with either a temporary or permanent marker. Table 3. Summary of drainage ditch monitoring sites surveyed in 2006.

Site ID Basin # Year Treated Treatment Type Survey Date 005DD* 1 2001 Erosion Control Fabric May 2 010DD* 1 2001 Erosion Control Fabric June 13 042DD 7 N/A N/A June 15 046DD 7 N/A N/A June 15 051DD 7 N/A N/A June 22 057DD 7 N/A N/A June 22 061DD 7 N/A N/A June 14 071DD 7 N/A N/A June 28 080DD* 7 ? Recycled Asphalt June 22 082DD* 7 ? Recycled Asphalt June 21 085DD* 7 ? Recycled Asphalt June 22 092DD 3 2005 Shot-crete N/A 107DD** 3 2006 Shot-crete June 28 155DD 6 N/A N/A June 21 157DD 6 N/A N/A June 21 159DD 6 N/A N/A June 28 182DD 2 2003 Erosion Control Fabric June 13 188DD 2 2003 Erosion Control Fabric June 15 195DD 2 2003 Erosion Control Fabric June 13 205DD 2 2003 Erosion Control Fabric June 15 *Drainage ditch sites not associated with road cross section surveys **Surveyed after graded and prepped for shot-crete The procedure for surveying and relocating these cross sections is the same as for the road cross section sites. Using a tape stretched across the cross section as a guide, we survey as many verticals as needed to define the shape of the ditch. The procedure for post processing drainage ditch cross section data is identical to the road cross section procedure. Appendix E contains graphs of each cross section. Photographs and survey data for all drainage ditch sites are on the data DVD’s. Conveyance Channels There are 115 conveyance channels that have been identified and surveyed during the first 3 years of this monitoring effort. This year 30 of those conveyance channels have been resurveyed. These include conveyance channels below all rock weirs, seven channels that have been treated, and 6 channels that won’t be treated until the last phases of the road construction. The idea behind surveying these treated and untreated channels this year is to continuously monitor a subsample of conveyance channels rather than trying to continuously survey all 115, which would be prohibitive. Table 4 has a summary of the conveyance channels surveyed in 2006 and identifies sites to be subsampled annually. Each channel had a series of three cross sections (labeled A-C) located within the 150 foot boundary of the highway corridor. Left and right cross section end points were monumented with rebar, providing a minimum of 6 fixed points by

13

Page 14: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

which to relocate future surveys. A tape stretched between the left and right end points was used as a tag line to guide the cross section survey and enough verticals were taken to describe the features of the channel. Post processing was similar to that of the drainage ditches where all points in the cross section were corrected to the left-right end point vector. Photographs and survey data for all conveyance channels surveyed in 2006 are on the data DVD’s. Appendix F contains tabulations of all channel geometry calculations and graphs of each cross section. Table 4. Summary of conveyance channel monitoring sites visited in 2006.

Site ID Basin # Year Treated Sub-Sample Treatment Type Survey Date 016CC 2 2003 Treated Culvert Plugged August 9 021CC 2 2003 Treated Shot Crete Ditch August 9 030CC 2 2003 Treated Fabric July 13 031CC 2 2003 Fabric July 13 035CC 2 N/A N/A August 10 037CC 3 N/A Untreated N/A August 16 040CC 1 2001 Treated Curb August 9 058CC 7 N/A Untreated N/A August 16 063CC 7 N/A Untreated N/A August 16 070CC 7 N/A Untreated N/A August 17 089CC 7 2005 Rock Weir July 19 094CC 7 2005 Treated Culvert Plugged August 10 104CC 6 N/A Untreated N/A August 24 127CC 6 N/A Untreated N/A August 24 175CC 1 2003 Treated Curb August 10 184CC 2 2003 Rock Weir May 31 211CC 2 2003 Treated Shot Crete Ditch August 9 216CC 1 2001 Curb, Rock Weir July 19 217CC 1 2001 Curb, Rock Weir July 19 220CC 1 2001 Rock Weir July 6 221CC 1 2001 Rock Weir June 28 222CC 1 2001 Rock Weir June 28 223CC 1 2001 Rock Weir July 6 224CC 2 2003 Treated Rock Weir, Asphalt Ditch July 12 225CC 2 2003 Rock Weir, Fabric July 12 226CC 2 2003 Rock Weir, Curb July 19 228CC 2 2003 Rock Weir July 20 229CC 2 2003 Rock Weir July 13 230CC 2 2003 Rock Weir July 13 235CC 5 2005 Rock Weir July 26

Individual conveyance channels contribute varying quantities of sediment down slope to the streams and reservoir below. Some of these channels likely have been in existence since the road was created and some have developed more recently. Some conveyance channel sites below rock weirs surveyed in 2006 are not “channels” yet but potentially could become channels in the future. Another site that is not a conveyance channel yet is 232CC, below the snotel site at Glen Cove. This potential channel parallels Glen Cove Creek and may be the result of a spring that has emerged, possibly from the diverted flow from Ski Creek. This site encompasses Glen Cove Creek and contains five cross sections

14

Page 15: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

instead of three and was not surveyed in 2006. It may be a worthwhile addition to the annual subsample group. Sediment Ponds and Traps In May and September of 2006, rock weirs in Basins 1, 2, and 3 were surveyed to determine their effectiveness in trapping sediment derived from winter snowmelt and summer rain events. The highway mitigation crew attempted to install two or three rock weirs in 2006 through the switchbacks (post paving) but the weirs washed away. No waypoints were created. A summary of survey location, dates and sediment volume accumulated in the associated silt fences is presented in Table 5. No weirs were cleaned out in 2006. Volume of sediment captured by each structure can be determined by comparing two grid surveys of each basin and calculating fill volume differences from the DTM’s. Winter accumulation is determined by comparing the May survey volume to the September volume and the summer contribution is determined by comparing the September and May surveys. To determine weir effectiveness in trapping sediment, we installed silt fences below the rock weirs to capture any material that might pass over, under, or through the structure. These fences were surveyed in the same manner as the cut and fill slope silt fences and the results are reported in Table 5 with silt fence survey dates in Appendix G. Table 5. Summary of sediment trap monitoring sites and associated silt fences in 2006. Site ID Basin

# Year Built

Survey Date 2006

Silt Fence Sediment Volume

(ft3)/Date

Silt Fence Sediment Volume

(ft3)/Date

002RW 1 2001 May 26 , Sep 14 003RW 1 2001 May 10 , Sep 01 006RW 1 2001 May 02 , Sep 11 008RW 1 2001 May 06 , Sep 05 009RA 1 2001 May 06 , Sep 03 152RW 2 2003 May 10 , Sep 13 2.1/May 08 0.4/Jun 19 153RW 2 2003 May 30 , Sep 14 161RW 2 2003 May 24 , Sep 13 162RW 2 2003 May 10 , Sep 06 0.3/May 18 0.5/Sep 20 176RW 2 2003 May 24 , Sep 05 0.9/May 08 178RW 2 2003 May 24 , Sep 19 0.7/May 08 179RW 2 2003 May 24 , Sep 11 180RW 2 2003 May 11 , Sep 06 181RW* 2 2003 May 11 0.4/May 16 200RW 2 2003 May 04 , Sep 03 0.1/May 19 201RW 2 2003 May 23 , Sep 13 202RW 2 2003 May 24 , Sep 11 0.5/May 08 233RW* 3 2005 May 26 234RW* 3 2005 May 31 236RW* 3 2005 May 31 237RW* 3 2005 May 31 *No September survey due to snow cover.

15

Page 16: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

This was the third year the large sediment pond in Basin 2 (199RW) was in operation and the second year for a smaller sediment pond established in Basin 3 just below the Ski Creek diversion wall (237RW). Unlike the rock weirs which drain relatively small sections of road, these ponds collect storm drainage from extended lengths of highway using a network of shot-crete drainage ditches and culverts. The large pond diverts storm runoff from Crystal Creek (North Fork) into the Ski Creek basin. Water entering199RW, is filtered through a gravel-encased perforated standpipe, and discharged through a culvert downstream. The monitoring effort for the pond includes 5 cross sections to estimate volumetric changes in sediment accumulation, suspended sediment samples taken above the pond where the shot-crete conveyance channel ends and at the outlet (pipe) during storm runoff to measure effectiveness in capturing sediment, and 3 cross sections in the channel below the pond outlet (184CC) to measure changes in channel dimension. Road runoff enters and exits the smaller pond (237RW) via shot-creted drainage ditches that drain from Severy and Ski Creek drainages into Glen Cove Creek. The pond actually is part of Ski Creek just below the diversion wall built in 2004 and water can also be introduced into the pond if it overtops the diversion. A stand pipe at the base of the pond can spill excess water under the highway and into Ski Creek (Figure 2). The monitoring effort for the pond includes 3 cross sections to estimate volumetric changes in sediment accumulation. Graphs of sediment ponds are in Appendix G.

Figure 2. Sediment pond 237RW below Ski Creek diversion wall.

16

Page 17: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

To measure the sediment capturing effectiveness of 199RW, we took 1 suspended sediment grab sample on July 20, 2006. Laboratory results are pending and will be provided in the next report. Photographs and survey data of all sites are contained on the data DVD’s. Validation Monitoring The objective of validation monitoring is to document the effect road mitigation practices have on the aquatic, wetland, and riparian communities that are within the influence of the Pike’s Peak Highway. By monitoring features in both reference (non-highway influenced) and impaired streams, relative (converging or diverging) changes observed in these features over time between the 2 groups would be attributed to the road mitigation practices. The nine streams identified as either impacted or non-impacted by the presence and maintenance of the Pikes Peak Highway by ERO Resources Corporation (1999) are: North Catamount, South Catamount, Oil, and Boehmer Creeks as reference or non-impacted streams; and Ski, Severy, East Fork of Beaver, North Fork of Crystal, and West Fork of Beaver Creek as stream systems impacted by the highway. In 2005, two new sites were established in response to the diversion wall built on Ski Creek to divert all alpine runoff into Glen Cove Creek. Glen Cove Creek is a tributary to South Catamount Creek, and enters upstream from the two “reference” reaches on South Catamount Creek. The diversion on Ski Creek will increase the water yield and likely the peaks of both Glen Cove and South Catamount creeks so we established monitoring sites just above the confluence on each of the streams and named them GLEN1 and SCAT3, respectively. Stream Channel Surveys Time and budgetary constraints require that we be circumspect with our field season to make the most of our limited time. While it’s probably not necessary to survey every stream every year, it is reasonable to survey at least one control and one impacted stream each year. This year we selected Severy Creek as our highway impacted stream and North Catamount Creek as our control. We also chose to survey North Fork Crystal Creek because of the work the Rocky Mountain Field Institute was doing in the conveyance channels above both stream reaches. The same equipment and methodology described by Nankervis (2004) was employed for 2006 surveys. Cross Sections Five cross sections per reach were established to document changes in active channel geometry. Cross section end points were monumented with rebar capped with yellow plastic to provide ten permanent reference locations per reach to maintain continuity in monitoring over the course of the study. A tape was stretched between the two cross section endpoints to act as a tagline to align the survey. Post processing stream cross section data is identical to the procedures used for all other types of cross sections surveyed in this study. Graphs of each cross section are presented in Appendix H. Consistently monitoring channel dimensions at the same location provides an excellent measure of both lateral and vertical channel adjustment within each reach. Photographs

17

Page 18: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

of left and right bank and upstream and downstream views at each cross section, with photograph ID board, are contained on the data DVD as is all the survey data. Particle Size Distribution Pebble Counts Pebble counts (300 particles) in each reach were done to characterize the bed material of the active channel using the Bevenger and King Pebble Count Procedure (Bevenger and King, 1995). A tabulation of the 15th, 35th, 50th, 84th, and 95th percentile and graphs of the distributions are presented in Appendix I. Comparing the particle size distributions from successive pebble count surveys, to document trends in the percent fines between control and impacted sites, will be useful in defining one aspect of the in-channel impact of the reduction in sediment supply or discharge. Grab Samples Grab samples were taken from bars at NCRY1, NCRY2, and SVRY2. No bar sample was taken at SVRY1 because there are no depositional features, and none were taken at North Catamount Creek because stream flow was high from snowmelt. Laboratory analysis is still pending on the three samples taken so the results will be presented in the next report. Vegetation Vegetation photo points were established at the top of the left and right banks at each cross section to document changes in species composition and percent cover over time. Vegetation was grouped into general categories of moss, grass, sedge, forb, or shrub to document presence, and percent cover estimated for the top of bank area 1.5 feet on either side of the cross section. A tape stretched between the cross section end pins was used to determine the distance from the left bank pin for the top of bank as well as the camera position. A pocket rod was used to indicate the three foot transect of interest at the top of bank (12-inch metal ruler used as reference on Severy Creek photos) and an ID board was used to indicate cross section and bank ID (AL = Cross Section A, Left Bank; DR = Cross Section D, Right Bank) for the photograph. All photographs were taken with an Olympus Stylus 400 digital camera and our field procedures generally follow those outlined in the Photo Point Monitoring Handbook (Hall 2002). A tabulation of the data recorded and photographs taken at each site is presented in Appendix J. Photographs taken of the same site, from the same location, should provide good documentation of trends in specie composition and percent cover over time. Please note that stream surveys are typically performed in mid to late summer and the riparian vegetation composition reflects that. In 2006, North Fork Crystal Creek was surveyed at the beginning of May so much of the herbaceous vegetation that could be present in the summer may not have been up at the time of this survey.

18

Page 19: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

References Bevenger, Gregory S. and Rudy M. King. 1995 A Pebble Count Procedure for Assessing

Watershed Cumulative Effects. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper RM-RP-319. Fort Collins, CO 17pp.

Hall, F.C. 2002. Photo point monitoring handbook: Part A-Field procedures. USDA

Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PNW-GTR-526. Portland, OR 48pp.

Nankervis, J.M. 2004. Monitoring effectiveness and validating response to the road

related mitigation practices implemented on the Pike’s Peak Highway. Blue Mountain Consultants, Berthoud, CO. Unpublished Report 22 pp plus Appendices.

Nankervis, J.M. 2005. Monitoring effectiveness and validating response to the road

related mitigation practices implemented on the Pike’s Peak Highway. Blue Mountain Consultants, Berthoud, CO. Unpublished Report 29 pp plus Appendices.

Nankervis, J.M. 2006. Monitoring effectiveness and validating response to the road

related mitigation practices implemented on the Pike’s Peak Highway. Blue Mountain Consultants, Berthoud, CO. Unpublished Report 21 pp plus Appendices.

USDA Forest Service. 2000. Decision notice and finding of no significant impact – Pikes

Peak Highway drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan. Pike and San Isabel National Forests and Cimarron Comanche National Grassland. Pueblo, Colorado. 16 pp.

19

Page 20: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented
Page 21: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Appendix A

Site Locations for Effectiveness and Validation Monitoring

2006

21

Page 22: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Site Locations for Effectiveness and Validation Monitoring 2006 Latitude Longitude Altitude Site ID (hddd°mm.mmm) (hddd°mm.mmm) (ft) Feature Description

001FS N38 55.211 W105 02.238 9410 Fill Slope 002RW N38 55.224 W105 02.264 9410 Rock Weir/Apron 003RW N38 55.200 W105 02.258 9416 Rock Weir/Apron 004CC N38 55.132 W105 02.278 9431 Conveyance Channel 005DD N38 55.087 W105 02.415 9447 Drainage Ditch 006RW N38 55.109 W105 02.482 9415 Rock Weir/Apron 007FS N38 55.094 W105 02.520 9414 Fill Slope 008RW N38 55.075 W105 02.554 9417 Rock Weir/Apron 009RA N38 55.046 W105 02.655 9443 Rock Weir/Apron 010DD N38 54.907 W105 02.734 9457 Drainage Ditch 011CS N38 54.909 W105 02.730 9459 Cut Slope 012CC N38 54.748 W105 03.060 9528 Conveyance Channel 013CC N38 54.730 W105 03.068 9525 Conveyance Channel 014CC N38 54.691 W105 03.089 9519 Conveyance Channel 015CC N38 54.603 W105 03.174 9547 Conveyance Channel 016CC N38 54.602 W105 03.111 9525 Conveyance Channel 017CC N38 54.510 W105 03.246 9565 Conveyance Channel 018CC N38 54.472 W105 03.298 9576 Conveyance Channel 019CC N38 54.457 W105 03.384 9599 Conveyance Channel 020CC N38 54.345 W105 03.383 9637 Conveyance Channel 021CC N38 54.299 W105 03.461 9668 Conveyance Channel 022CC N38 54.288 W105 03.552 9692 Conveyance Channel 023CC N38 54.272 W105 03.583 9701 Conveyance Channel 024CC N38 54.289 W105 03.638 9715 Conveyance Channel 025CC N38 54.258 W105 03.697 9744 Conveyance Channel 026CC N38 54.232 W105 03.643 9752 Conveyance Channel 027CC N38 54.183 W105 03.652 9771 Conveyance Channel 028CC N38 54.149 W105 03.714 9818 Conveyance Channel 029CC N38 54.145 W105 03.816 9856 Conveyance Channel 030CC N38 54.134 W105 03.828 9855 Conveyance Channel 031CC N38 54.130 W105 03.829 9861 Conveyance Channel 032CC N38 54.159 W105 03.836 9858 Conveyance Channel 033CC N38 54.106 W105 03.854 9886 Conveyance Channel 034CC N38 54.037 W105 03.896 9940 Conveyance Channel 035CC N38 53.909 W105 04.000 10060 Conveyance Channel 036CC N38 53.866 W105 03.875 10126 Conveyance Channel 037CC N38 53.821 W105 03.855 10217 Conveyance Channel 038CC N38 53.759 W105 03.787 10254 Conveyance Channel 039FS N38 54.910 W105 02.812 9455 Fill Slope 040CC N38 54.914 W105 02.789 9464 Conveyance Channel 041CP N38 53.807 W105 03.893 10072 Road Survey Control Point 042DD N38 53.719 W105 03.746 10161 Drainage Ditch 043FS N38 53.726 W105 03.764 10180 Fill Slope 044RX N38 53.726 W105 03.763 10183 Road Cross Section 045CS N38 53.657 W105 03.868 10266 Cut Slope 046DD N38 53.658 W105 03.868 10268 Drainage Ditch 047RX N38 53.658 W105 03.868 10268 Road Cross Section

22

Page 23: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Site Locations for Effectiveness and Validation Monitoring 2006 Latitude Longitude Altitude Site ID (hddd°mm.mmm) (hddd°mm.mmm) (ft) Feature Description

048FS N38 53.651 W105 03.880 10275 Fill Slope049CS N38 53.592 W105 04.020 10406 Cut Slope050RX N38 53.593 W105 04.020 10404 Road Cross Section 051DD N38 53.593 W105 04.021 10397 Drainage Ditch 052FS N38 53.593 W105 04.021 10401 Fill Slope 053CC N38 53.560 W105 04.127 10478 Conveyance Channel 054CC N38 53.579 W105 04.148 10448 Conveyance Channel 055FS N38 53.612 W105 04.095 10445 Fill Slope 056RX N38 53.614 W105 04.096 10442 Road Cross Section 057DD N38 53.613 W105 04.095 10445 Drainage Ditch 058CC N38 53.513 W105 04.057 10512 Conveyance Channel 059CS N38 53.353 W105 04.222 10697 Cut Slope 060RX N38 53.354 W105 04.219 10691 Road Cross Section 061DD N38 53.221 W105 04.381 10808 Drainage Ditch 062RX N38 53.216 W105 04.381 10805 Road Cross Section 063CC N38 53.223 W105 04.394 10803 Conveyance Channel 064CC N38 53.448 W105 04.155 10634 Conveyance Channel 065CC N38 53.382 W105 04.192 10679 Conveyance Channel 066CC N38 53.336 W105 04.243 10701 Conveyance Channel 067CC N38 53.297 W105 04.299 10736 Conveyance Channel 068CC N38 53.251 W105 04.305 10841 Conveyance Channel 069CC N38 53.019 W105 04.287 10989 Conveyance Channel 070CC N38 52.956 W105 04.276 11028 Conveyance Channel 071DD N38 52.972 W105 04.285 11017 Drainage Ditch 072RX N38 52.972 W105 04.285 11015 Road Cross Section 073ST N38 52.879 W105 04.311 11062 Sediment Trap 074FS N38 52.927 W105 04.272 11053 Fill Slope 075RG N38 53.797 W105 03.890 10109 Precipitation Gauge 076RG N38 52.582 W105 03.970 11810 Precipitation Gauge 077RG N38 51.783 W105 03.999 13069 Precipitation Gauge 078CS N38 53.331 W105 04.275 10478 Cut Slope 079FS N38 52.882 W105 04.382 11254 Fill Slope 080DD N38 52.865 W105 04.391 11256 Drainage Ditch 081CC N38 52.943 W105 04.415 11194 Conveyance Channel 082DD N38 52.787 W105 04.376 11284 Drainage Ditch 083FS N38 52.777 W105 04.362 11288 Fill Slope 084CC N38 52.796 W105 04.471 11360 Conveyance Channel 085DD N38 52.786 W105 04.410 11313 Drainage Ditch 086FS N38 52.602 W105 04.390 11447 Fill Slope 087CS N38 52.435 W105 04.432 11542 Cut Slope 088FS N38 52.388 W105 04.549 11590 Fill Slope 089CC N38 52.391 W105 04.555 11580 Conveyance Channel 090CS N38 52.366 W105 04.540 11604 Cut Slope 091CC N38 52.402 W105 04.414 11643 Conveyance Channel 092DD N38 52.432 W105 04.204 11781 Drainage Ditch 093FS N38 52.399 W105 04.401 11642 Fill Slope

23

Page 24: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Site Locations for Effectiveness and Validation Monitoring 2006 Site ID Latitude

(hddd°mm.mmm) Longitude

(hddd°mm.mmm) Altitude

(ft) Feature Description

094CC N38 52.540 W105 04.069 11873 Conveyance Channel 095CC N38 52.452 W105 04.205 11787 Conveyance Channel 096CC N38 52.379 W105 04.217 11746 Conveyance Channel 097CC N38 52.381 W105 04.310 11678 Conveyance Channel 098FS N38 52.265 W105 03.995 12242 Fill Slope 099CC N38 52.131 W105 04.046 12319 Conveyance Channel100CC N38 52.133 W105 03.936 12353 Conveyance Channel 101FS N38 52.097 W105 03.875 12390 Fill Slope 102CS N38 51.641 W105 04.063 12963 Cut Slope 103FS N38 51.491 W105 04.021 12950 Fill Slope 104CC N38 51.444 W105 03.894 12923 Conveyance Channel 105FS N38 51.062 W105 03.694 13083 Fill Slope 106CC N38 52.082 W105 03.858 12251 Conveyance Channel 107DD N38 52.044 W105 03.824 12312 Drainage Ditch 108CC N38 51.994 W105 03.769 12362 Conveyance Channel 109CC N38 52.027 W105 03.825 12393 Conveyance Channel 110CC N38 52.062 W105 03.914 12448 Conveyance Channel 111CC N38 52.051 W105 03.992 12511 Conveyance Channel 112CC N38 52.049 W105 03.933 12531 Conveyance Channel 113CC N38 52.002 W105 03.873 12577 Conveyance Channel 114CC N38 51.956 W105 03.840 12601 Conveyance Channel 115CC N38 51.977 W105 03.995 12692 Conveyance Channel 116CC N38 51.940 W105 04.080 12736 Conveyance Channel 117CC N38 51.925 W105 04.141 12777 Conveyance Channel 118CC N38 51.912 W105 04.177 12797 Conveyance Channel 119CC N38 51.914 W105 04.032 12850 Conveyance Channel 120CC N38 51.823 W105 04.090 12876 Conveyance Channel 121CC N38 51.439 W105 03.804 12877 Conveyance Channel 122CC N38 51.347 W105 03.789 12920 Conveyance Channel 123CS N38 51.361 W105 03.782 12920 Cut Slope 124FS N38 51.362 W105 03.788 12931 Fill Slope 125CC N38 51.238 W105 03.806 12986 Conveyance Channel 126CC N38 51.158 W105 03.789 13031 Conveyance Channel 127CC N38 51.032 W105 03.697 13064 Conveyance Channel 128FS N38 50.930 W105 03.732 13072 Fill Slope 129CC N38 50.897 W105 03.662 13068 Conveyance Channel 130CC N38 50.900 W105 03.177 13183 Conveyance Channel 131CC N38 50.940 W105 03.382 13088 Conveyance Channel 132CC N38 50.840 W105 03.274 13217 Conveyance Channel 133CC N38 50.768 W105 03.213 13282 Conveyance Channel 134CC N38 50.671 W105 03.035 13401 Conveyance Channel 135CC N38 50.285 W105 02.872 13677 Conveyance Channel 136CC N38 50.299 W105 02.931 13624 Conveyance Channel 137CC N38 50.260 W105 02.755 13733 Conveyance Channel 138CC N38 50.221 W105 02.605 13805 Conveyance Channel 139CC N38 50.774 W105 03.110 13370 Conveyance Channel

24

Page 25: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Site Locations for Effectiveness and Validation Monitoring 2006 Latitude Longitude Altitude Site ID (hddd°mm.mmm) (hddd°mm.mmm) (ft) Feature Description

140CC N38 50.730 W105 03.195 13327 Conveyance Channel 141CS N38 51.043 W105 03.690 13103 Cut Slope 152RW N38 54.912 W105 02.837 9444 Rock Weir/Apron 153RW N38 54.741 W105 03.066 9457 Rock Weir/Apron 154RX N38 52.040 W105 03.817 12112 Road Cross Section 155DD N38 51.245 W105 03.803 12917 Drainage Ditch 156RX N38 51.244 W105 03.799 12922 Road Cross Section 157DD N38 51.074 W105 03.684 13100 Drainage Ditch 158RX N38 51.074 W105 03.683 13099 Road Cross Section 159DD N38 51.610 W105 04.072 13091 Drainage Ditch160RX N38 51.611 W105 04.072 13066 Road Cross Section 161RW N38 54.720 W105 03.055 9516 Rock Weir/Apron 162RW N38 54.887 W105 02.854 9518 Rock Weir/Apron 163RA N38 54.665 W105 03.115 9528 Rock Weir/Apron 175CC N38 55.104 W105 02.532 9437 Conveyance Channel 176RW N38 54.146 W105 03.795 9838 Rock Weir 177FS N38 55.302 W105 02.224 9323 Fill Slope 178RW N38 54.142 W105 03.821 9839 Rock Weir 179RW N38 54.127 W105 03.852 9851 Rock Weir 180RW N38 54.055 W105 03.903 9906 Rock Weir 181RW N38 54.025 W105 03.918 9919 Rock Weir 182DD N38 54.895 W105 02.860 9430 Drainage Ditch 183FS N38 54.675 W105 03.109 9453 Fill Slope 184CC N38 54.708 W105 03.363 9308 Conveyance Channel 185CS N38 54.536 W105 03.246 9532 Cut Slope 186FS N38 54.524 W105 03.242 9538 Fill Slope 187FS N38 54.281 W105 03.658 9711 Fill Slope 188DD N38 54.075 W105 03.892 9894 Drainage Ditch 189CC N38 54.073 W105 03.886 9887 Conveyance Channel 190CC N38 54.095 W105 03.869 9871 Conveyance Channel 191CC N38 54.117 W105 03.854 9855 Conveyance Channel 192CS N38 54.183 W105 03.677 9786 Cut Slope 193FS N38 54.821 W105 02.983 9507 Fill Slope 194FS N38 54.811 W105 03.004 9506 Fill Slope 195DD N38 54.827 W105 02.983 9505 Drainage Ditch 196FS N38 54.872 W105 02.900 9497 Fill Slope 197CS N38 54.364 W105 03.383 9640 Cut Slope 198FS N38 54.497 W105 03.254 9560 Fill Slope 199RW N38 54.688 W105 03.389 9326 Sediment Pond 200RW N38 55.261 W105 02.246 9418 Rock Weir 201RW N38 54.805 W105 03.021 9522 Rock Weir 202RW N38 54.619 W105 03.132 9450 Rock Weir 203FS N38 54.603 W105 03.139 9517 Fill Slope 204FS N38 54.273 W105 03.572 9707 Fill Slope 205DD N38 54.022 W105 03.927 9983 Drainage Ditch 206CC N38 54.689 W105 03.097 9506 Conveyance Channel

25

Page 26: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Site Locations for Effectiveness and Validation Monitoring 2006 Latitude Longitude Altitude Site ID (hddd°mm.mmm) (hddd°mm.mmm) (ft) Feature Description

207CC N38 51.664 W105 04.062 12962 Conveyance Channel 208CC N38 52.754 W105 04.445 11172 Conveyance Channel 209CC N38 52.647 W105 04.411 11365 Conveyance Channel 210CC N38 54.059 W105 03.916 9849 Conveyance Channel 211CC N38 54.130 W105 03.844 9853 Conveyance Channel 212CC N38 53.149 W105 04.311 10893 Conveyance Channel 213CC N38 50.964 W105 03.391 13046 Conveyance Channel 214CC N38 50.234 W105 02.661 13198 Conveyance Channel 215CC N38 50.356 W105 02.792 13375 Conveyance Channel 216CC N38 55.263 W105 02.236 9289 Conveyance Channel 217CC N38 55.255 W105 02.232 9284 Conveyance Channel 218CC N38 55.226 W105 02.268 9359 Conveyance Channel 219CC N38 55.202 W105 02.262 9371 Conveyance Channel 220CC N38 55.108 W105 02.482 9411 Conveyance Channel221CC N38 55.107 W105 02.482 9305 Conveyance Channel 222CC N38 55.070 W105 02.554 9319 Conveyance Channel 223CC N38 55.048 W105 02.657 9394 Conveyance Channel 224CC N38 54.878 W105 02.852 9493 Conveyance Channel 225CC N38 54.917 W105 02.840 9441 Conveyance Channel 226CC N38 54.796 W105 03.010 9431 Conveyance Channel 227CC N38 54.706 W105 03.053 9480 Conveyance Channel 228CC N38 54.746 W105 03.078 9431 Conveyance Channel 229CC N38 54.140 W105 03.788 9774 Conveyance Channel 230CC N38 54.028 W105 03.912 9902 Conveyance Channel 231CC N38 54.050 W105 03.908 9910 Conveyance Channel 232CC N38 52.583 W105 04.557 11399 Conveyance Channel 233RW N38 52.383 W105 04.560 11074 Rock Weir 234RW N38 52.502 W105 03.924 11915 Rock Weir 235CC N38 52.504 W105 03.920 11928 Conveyance Channel 236RW N38 52.185 W105 04.066 12177 Rock Weir 237RW N38 52.398 W105 04.393 11219 Rock Weir BHMR1 N38 48.951 W105 03.040 11885 Boehmer Creek 1 BHMR2 N38 49.061 W105 03.027 11995 Boehmer Creek 2 EBVR1 N38 49.832 W105 03.612 12156 East Fork Beaver Creek 1 EBVR2 N38 49.907 W105 03.598 12190 East Fork Beaver Creek 2 GLEN1 N38 54.457 W105 04.690 9519 Glen Cove Creek 1 NCAT1 N38 54.746 W105 05.994 9415 North Catamount Creek 1 NCAT2 N38 54.402 W105 06.106 9519 North Catamount Creek 2 NCRY1* N38 54.418 W105 03.199 9453 North Fork Crystal Creek 1 & 2 OILC1 N38 48.449 W105 06.511 10505 Oil Creek 1 SCAT1 N38 55.035 W105 04.112 9368 South Catamount Creek 1 SCAT2 N38 54.974 W105 04.181 9345 South Catamount Creek 2 SCAT3 N38 54.316 W105 04.899 9412 South Catamount Creek 3 SKIC1 N38 54.975 W105 04.078 9418 Ski Creek 1 SKIC2 N38 53.767 W105 03.987 10035 Ski Creek 2 SVRY1 N38 52.467 W105 03.039 10732 Severy Creek 1

26

Page 27: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Site Locations for Effectiveness and Validation Monitoring 2006 Latitude Longitude Altitude Site ID (hddd°mm.mmm) (hddd°mm.mmm) (ft) Feature Description

SVRY2 N38 52.472 W105 03.339 10926 Severy Creek 2 WBVR1 N38 48.181 W105 05.710 10726 West Fork Beaver Creek 1 WBVR2 N38 48.349 W105 05.591 10698 West Fork Beaver Creek 2 * North Fork Crystal Creek 2 (NCRY2) is located 200 ft upstream from NCRY1

27

Page 28: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented
Page 29: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Appendix B

Cut Slope Survey Dates and Sediment Accumulation

2006

29

Page 30: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Survey Dates of Cut Slope Silt Fences 2006

Site ID Cut Slope Site Visit Dates 2006 011CS 5/8/2006 5/18/2006 5/23/2006 6/19/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/20/2006 045CS 6/1/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006 049CS 6/6/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006 059CS 6/7/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 078CS 6/7/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 087CS 6/7/2006 7/6/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 090CS 6/1/2006 7/6/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/15/2006 102CS 6/8/2006 8/2/2006 123CS 6/8/2006 8/2/2006 8/23/2006 141CS 6/10/2006 6/21/2006 8/2/2006 8/23/2006 185CS 5/16/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006192CS 5/30/2006 6/26/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 8/2/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006 197CS 5/8/2006 5/21/2006 6/26/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006

30

Page 31: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Sediment Accumulation in Cut Slope Silt Fences 2006

Site ID Location Date Volume (ft3)

Grab Sample

011CS Lower Fence 050806 0.9 No 045CS Lower Fence 060106 1.1 No 045CS Upper Fence 060106 0.1 No 049CS Lower Fence 060606 0.1 No 049CS Lower Fence 072606 0.5 No 059CS Lower Fence 060706 1.3 No 078CS Lower Fence 060706 0.7 No 087CS Lower Fence 060706 1.2 No 123CS Lower Fence 060806 2.2 No 141CS Lower Fence 061006 1.1 No 141CS Lower Fence 082306 0.9 No 141CS Upper Fence 061006 0.3 No 185CS Upper Fence 051606 1.5 No 192CS Lower Fence 092006 0.9 No 192CS Lower Fence 072707 1.1 No 192CS Lower Fence 053006 1.1 No 197CS Lower Fence 050806 0.5 No 197CS Lower Fence 092006 0.8 No 197CS Upper Fence 050806 0.2 No

31

Page 32: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented
Page 33: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Appendix C

Fill Slope Survey Dates and Sediment Accumulations

2006

33

Page 34: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Survey Dates of Fill Slope Silt Fences 2006 Site ID Fill Slope Site Visit Dates 2006 001FS 5/19/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/20/2006 007FS 5/2/2006 5/21/2006 6/19/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/20/2006039FS 5/18/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/20/2006 043FS 6/1/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006 048FS 6/6/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006052FS 6/6/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006055FS 6/6/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006074FS 6/7/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/24/2006079FS 6/7/2006 7/6/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 083FS 6/7/2006 7/6/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 086FS 6/7/2006 7/6/2006 7/17/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 088FS 6/1/2006 7/6/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/15/2006093FS 6/7/2006 7/6/2006 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/15/2006098FS 6/7/2006 7/6/2006 8/2/2006 8/15/2006 101FS 7/26/2006 8/2/2006 8/15/2006 103FS 8/2/2006 105FS 6/10/2006 8/2/2006 124FS 6/8/2006 6/10/2006 8/2/2006 128FS 8/2/2006 177FS 5/14/2006 5/19/2006 6/19/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/20/2006183FS 5/30/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/20/2006186FS 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006187FS 6/26/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 9/20/2006193FS 6/26/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/20/2006194FS 5/8/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/20/2006196FS 5/23/2006 6/19/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/20/2006198FS 6/26/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006203FS 5/24/2006 7/5/2006 7/12/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/20/2006204FS 6/26/2006 7/5/2006 7/17/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/27/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006

34

Page 35: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

35

Sediment Accumulation in Fill Slope Silt Fences 2006

Site ID Location Date Volume (ft3)

Grab Sample

001FS Upper Fence 051906 1.3 No 001FS Upper Fence 070506 1.5 No 001FS Upper Fence 082706 1.4 No 001FS Upper Fence 092006 0.6 No 007FS Upper Fence 1 050206 0.8 No 007FS Upper Fence 2 050206 0.5 No 039FS Lower Fence 1 051806 0.5 No 039FS Lower Fence 2 051806 0.8 No 039FS Upper Fence 1 051806 1.4 No 043FS Upper Fence 060106 3.2 No 043FS Upper Fence 072606 3.2 No 048FS Upper Fence 060606 6.5 No 048FS Upper Fence 072606 4.0 No 048FS Upper Fence 082706 0.8 No 052FS Upper Fence 060606 2.2 No 052FS Upper Fence 070506 1.1 No 052FS Upper Fence 072606 1.5 No 052FS Upper Fence 081706 0.8 No 055FS Upper Fence 060606 5.9 No 055FS Upper Fence 072606 6.7 No 055FS Upper Fence 081706 1.1 No 074FS Upper Fence 060706 2.0 No 074FS Upper Fence 082406 3.8 No 079FS Upper Fence 060706 1.3 No 079FS Upper Fence 072606 1.9 No 083FS Upper Fence 060706 1.1 No 083FS Upper Fence 072606 2.7 No 086FS Upper Fence 060706 2.2 No 086FS Upper Fence 072606 1.1 No 088FS Upper Fence 070606 2.2 No 088FS Upper Fence 072606 2.8 No 088FS Upper Fence 081506 11.8 No 089FS Upper Fence 060106 3.0 No 093FS Upper Fence 060706 1.0 No 093FS Upper Fence 070606 1.1 No 093FS Upper Fence 081506 8.6 No 098FS Upper Fence 060706 6.3 No 105FS Upper Fence 061006 3.2 No 177FS Upper Fence 051406 0.7 No 186FS Upper Fence 070506 1.4 No 193FS Upper Fence 052306 1.8 No 194FS Upper Fence 050806 0.1 No 196FS Upper Fence 052306 0.8 No 198FS Upper Fence 070506 0.7 No 203FS Upper Fence 052406 0.8 No

Page 36: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented
Page 37: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

37

Appendix D

Road Cross Section Graphs

2006

Page 38: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10500

10502

10504

10506

10508

10510

10512

10514

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

XSA

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 042DD044RX - 06152006

10500

10502

10504

10506

10508

10510

10512

10514

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

XSB

10494

10496

10498

10500

10502

10504

10506

10508

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

10492

10494

10496

10498

10500

10502

10504

10506

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9

XSD

0

10484

10486

10488

10490

10492

10494

10496

10498

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

38

Page 39: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10511

10512

10513

10514

10515

10516

10517

10518

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSA

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 046DD047RX - 06152006

10505

10506

10507

10508

10509

10510

10511

10512

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSB

10500

10501

10502

10503

10504

10505

10506

10507

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

10494

10495

10496

10497

10498

10499

10500

10501

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSD

10489

10490

10491

10492

10493

10494

10495

10496

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

39

Page 40: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10009

10010

10011

10012

10013

10014

10015

10016

10017

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XS

0

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 051DD050RX - 06222006

10001

10002

10003

10004

10005

10006

10007

10008

10009

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XSB

0

9994

9995

9996

9997

9998

9999

10000

10001

10002

0 10 20 30 40 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

60

9986

9987

9988

9989

9990

9991

9992

9993

9994

0 10 20 30 40 50

XSD

60

9980

9981

9982

9983

9984

9985

9986

9987

9988

0 10 20 30 40 50 6Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

40

Page 41: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10502

10504

10506

10508

10510

10512

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XS

70

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 057DD056RX - 06222006

10497

10499

10501

10503

10505

10507

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XSB

70

10490

10492

10494

10496

10498

10500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

10489

10491

10493

10495

10497

10499

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSD

0

10483

10485

10487

10489

10491

10493

0 10 20 30 40 50 60Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

70

41

Page 42: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10509

10511

10513

10515

10517

10519

10521

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

XSA

Road Cross Section 060RX - 06142006

10506

10508

10510

10512

10514

10516

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

XSB

10500

10502

10504

10506

10508

10510

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

10496

10498

10500

10502

10504

10506

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

XSD

10490

10492

10494

10496

10498

10500

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

42

Page 43: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10816

10818

10820

10822

10824

10826

10828

10830

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XS

70

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 061DD062RX - 06142006

10810

10812

10814

10816

10818

10820

10822

10824

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XSB

70

10804

10806

10808

10810

10812

10814

10816

10818

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

10795

10797

10799

10801

10803

10805

10807

10809

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSD

0

10792

10794

10796

10798

10800

10802

10804

10806

0 10 20 30 40 50 60Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

70

43

Page 44: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

11010

11012

11014

11016

11018

11020

11022

11024

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XS

0

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 071DD072RX - 06282006

11002

11004

11006

11008

11010

11012

11014

11016

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XSB

0

10995

10997

10999

11001

11003

11005

11007

11009

0 10 20 30 40 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

60

10992

10994

10996

10998

11000

11002

11004

11006

0 10 20 30 40 50

XSD

60

10989

10991

10993

10995

10997

10999

11001

11003

0 10 20 30 40 50 6Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

44

Page 45: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

12500

12505

12510

12515

12520

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XS

0

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 107DD154RX - 06282006

12500

12505

12510

12515

12520

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XSB

0

12495

12500

12505

12510

12515

0 10 20 30 40 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

60

12488

12493

12498

12503

12508

0 10 20 30 40 50

XSD

60

12483

12488

12493

12498

12503

0 10 20 30 40 50 6Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

45

Page 46: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

13200

13202

13204

13206

13208

13210

13212

13214

13216

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XS

0

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 155DD156RX - 06212006

13194

13196

13198

13200

13202

13204

13206

13208

13210

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XSB

0

13193

13195

13197

13199

13201

13203

13205

13207

13209

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

13190

13192

13194

13196

13198

13200

13202

13204

13206

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XSD

0

13180

13182

13184

13186

13188

13190

13192

13194

13196

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

46

Page 47: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

13302

13304

13306

13308

13310

13312

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XS

0

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 157DD158RX - 06212006

13299

13301

13303

13305

13307

13309

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XSB

0

13295

13297

13299

13301

13303

13305

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

13293

13295

13297

13299

13301

13303

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XSD

0

13290

13292

13294

13296

13298

13300

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

47

Page 48: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

12996

12998

13000

13002

13004

13006

13008

13010

13012

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XS

70

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 159DD160RX - 06282006

12996

12998

13000

13002

13004

13006

13008

13010

13012

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XSB

70

12996

12998

13000

13002

13004

13006

13008

13010

13012

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

12993

12995

12997

12999

13001

13003

13005

13007

13009

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSD

0

12992

12994

12996

12998

13000

13002

13004

13006

13008

0 10 20 30 40 50 60Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

70

48

Page 49: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

49

Appendix E

Drainage Ditch Graphs

2006

Page 50: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9998

10000

10002

10004

10006

10008

0 5 10 15 20 25

XSA

Drainage Ditch Cross Section 010DD - 06132006

9996

9998

10000

10002

10004

10006

0 5 10 15 20 25

XSB

9993

9995

9997

9999

10001

10003

0 5 10 15 20 25

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

9989

9991

9993

9995

9997

9999

0 5 10 15 20 25

XSD

9987

9989

9991

9993

9995

9997

0 5 10 15 20 25Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

50

Page 51: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10500

10502

10504

10506

10508

10510

10512

10514

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

XSA

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 042DD044RX - 06152006

10500

10502

10504

10506

10508

10510

10512

10514

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

XSB

10494

10496

10498

10500

10502

10504

10506

10508

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

10492

10494

10496

10498

10500

10502

10504

10506

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9

XSD

0

10484

10486

10488

10490

10492

10494

10496

10498

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

51

Page 52: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10511

10512

10513

10514

10515

10516

10517

10518

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSA

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 046DD047RX - 06152006

10505

10506

10507

10508

10509

10510

10511

10512

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSB

10500

10501

10502

10503

10504

10505

10506

10507

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

10494

10495

10496

10497

10498

10499

10500

10501

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSD

10489

10490

10491

10492

10493

10494

10495

10496

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

52

Page 53: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10009

10010

10011

10012

10013

10014

10015

10016

10017

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XS

0

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 051DD050RX - 06222006

10001

10002

10003

10004

10005

10006

10007

10008

10009

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XSB

0

9994

9995

9996

9997

9998

9999

10000

10001

10002

0 10 20 30 40 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

60

9986

9987

9988

9989

9990

9991

9992

9993

9994

0 10 20 30 40 50

XSD

60

9980

9981

9982

9983

9984

9985

9986

9987

9988

0 10 20 30 40 50 6Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

53

Page 54: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10502

10504

10506

10508

10510

10512

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XS

70

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 057DD056RX - 06222006

10497

10499

10501

10503

10505

10507

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XSB

70

10490

10492

10494

10496

10498

10500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

10489

10491

10493

10495

10497

10499

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSD

0

10483

10485

10487

10489

10491

10493

0 10 20 30 40 50 60Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

70

54

Page 55: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10816

10818

10820

10822

10824

10826

10828

10830

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XS

70

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 061DD062RX - 06142006

10810

10812

10814

10816

10818

10820

10822

10824

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XSB

70

10804

10806

10808

10810

10812

10814

10816

10818

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

10795

10797

10799

10801

10803

10805

10807

10809

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSD

0

10792

10794

10796

10798

10800

10802

10804

10806

0 10 20 30 40 50 60Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

70

55

Page 56: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

11010

11012

11014

11016

11018

11020

11022

11024

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XS

0

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 071DD072RX - 06282006

11002

11004

11006

11008

11010

11012

11014

11016

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XSB

0

10995

10997

10999

11001

11003

11005

11007

11009

0 10 20 30 40 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

60

10992

10994

10996

10998

11000

11002

11004

11006

0 10 20 30 40 50

XSD

60

10989

10991

10993

10995

10997

10999

11001

11003

0 10 20 30 40 50 6Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

56

Page 57: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

11403

11404

11405

11406

11407

11408

11409

11410

11411

0 5 10 15 20 25

XSA

Drainage Ditch Cross Section 080DD - 06222006

11399

11400

11401

11402

11403

11404

11405

11406

11407

0 5 10 15 20 25

XSB

11393

11394

11395

11396

11397

11398

11399

11400

11401

0 5 10 15 20 25

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

11389

11390

11391

11392

11393

11394

11395

11396

11397

0 5 10 15 20 25

XSD

11381

11382

11383

11384

11385

11386

11387

11388

11389

0 5 10 15 20 25Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

57

Page 58: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

11254

11255

11256

11257

11258

11259

11260

11261

0 5 10 15 20

XSA

Drainage Ditch Cross Section 082DD - 06212006

11248

11249

11250

11251

11252

11253

11254

11255

0 5 10 15 20

XSB

11244

11245

11246

11247

11248

11249

11250

11251

0 5 10 15 20

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

11239

11240

11241

11242

11243

11244

11245

11246

0 5 10 15 20

XSD

11232

11233

11234

11235

11236

11237

11238

11239

0 5 10 15 20Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

58

Page 59: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

11304

11305

11306

11307

11308

11309

11310

0 5 10 15 20 25

XSA

Drainage Ditch Cross Section 085DD - 06222006

11300

11301

11302

11303

11304

11305

11306

0 5 10 15 20 25

XSB

11296

11297

11298

11299

11300

11301

11302

0 5 10 15 20 25

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

11291

11292

11293

11294

11295

11296

11297

0 5 10 15 20 25

XSD

11284

11285

11286

11287

11288

11289

11290

0 5 10 15 20 25Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

59

Page 60: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

12500

12505

12510

12515

12520

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XS

0

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 107DD154RX - 06282006

12500

12505

12510

12515

12520

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XSB

0

12495

12500

12505

12510

12515

0 10 20 30 40 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

60

12488

12493

12498

12503

12508

0 10 20 30 40 50

XSD

60

12483

12488

12493

12498

12503

0 10 20 30 40 50 6Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

60

Page 61: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

13200

13202

13204

13206

13208

13210

13212

13214

13216

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XS

0

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 155DD156RX - 06212006

13194

13196

13198

13200

13202

13204

13206

13208

13210

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XSB

0

13193

13195

13197

13199

13201

13203

13205

13207

13209

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

13190

13192

13194

13196

13198

13200

13202

13204

13206

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XSD

0

13180

13182

13184

13186

13188

13190

13192

13194

13196

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

61

Page 62: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

13302

13304

13306

13308

13310

13312

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XS

0

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 157DD158RX - 06212006

13299

13301

13303

13305

13307

13309

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XSB

0

13295

13297

13299

13301

13303

13305

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

13293

13295

13297

13299

13301

13303

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XSD

0

13290

13292

13294

13296

13298

13300

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

62

Page 63: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

12996

12998

13000

13002

13004

13006

13008

13010

13012

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XS

70

A

Drainage Ditch/Road Cross Section 159DD160RX - 06282006

12996

12998

13000

13002

13004

13006

13008

13010

13012

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

XSB

70

12996

12998

13000

13002

13004

13006

13008

13010

13012

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

12993

12995

12997

12999

13001

13003

13005

13007

13009

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSD

0

12992

12994

12996

12998

13000

13002

13004

13006

13008

0 10 20 30 40 50 60Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

70

63

Page 64: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9502

9504

9506

9508

9510

9512

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

XSA

Drainage Ditch Cross Section 182DD - 06132006

9500

9502

9504

9506

9508

9510

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

XSB

9498

9500

9502

9504

9506

9508

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

9495

9497

9499

9501

9503

9505

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

XSD

9493

9495

9497

9499

9501

9503

0 5 10 15 20 25 30Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

64

Page 65: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10579

10580

10581

10582

10583

10584

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

XSA

Drainage Ditch Cross Section 188DD AtoE - 06152006

10558

10559

10560

10561

10562

10563

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

XSB

10543

10544

10545

10546

10547

10548

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

10526

10527

10528

10529

10530

10531

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

XSD

10511

10512

10513

10514

10515

10516

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

65

Page 66: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10500

10501

10502

10503

10504

10505

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

XSF

Drainage Ditch Cross Section 188DD FtoH - 06152006

10485

10486

10487

10488

10489

10490

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSG

10476

10477

10478

10479

10480

10481

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSH

66

Page 67: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9598

9599

9600

9601

9602

9603

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

XSA

Drainage Ditch Cross Section 195DD - 06132006

9598

9599

9600

9601

9602

9603

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

XSB

9598

9599

9600

9601

9602

9603

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

9598

9599

9600

9601

9602

9603

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

XSD

9598

9599

9600

9601

9602

9603

0 5 10 15 20 25 30Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

67

Page 68: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9598

9599

9600

9601

9602

9603

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

XSA

Drainage Ditch Cross Section 195DD - 06132006

9598

9599

9600

9601

9602

9603

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

XSB

9598

9599

9600

9601

9602

9603

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

9598

9599

9600

9601

9602

9603

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

XSD

9598

9599

9600

9601

9602

9603

0 5 10 15 20 25 30Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

68

Page 69: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10524

10525

10526

10527

10528

10529

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

XSA

Drainage Ditch Cross Section 205DD - 06152006

10517

10518

10519

10520

10521

10522

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

XSB

10510

10511

10512

10513

10514

10515

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

10496

10497

10498

10499

10500

10501

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

XSD

10484

10485

10486

10487

10488

10489

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

69

Page 70: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented
Page 71: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

71

Appendix F

Conveyance Channel Graphs

2006

Page 72: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9796

9797

9798

9799

9800

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

XSA

Conveyance Channel 016CC - 08092006

9791

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

9785

9786

9787

9788

9789

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

72

Page 73: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9696

9697

9698

9699

9700

9701

9702

9703

9704

9705

9706

9707

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

XSA

Conveyance Channel 021CC - 08092006

9690

9691

9692

9693

9694

9695

9696

9697

9698

9699

9700

9701

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

9680

9681

9682

9683

9684

9685

9686

9687

9688

9689

9690

9691

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

73

Page 74: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9842

9843

9844

9845

9846

9847

9848

9849

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSA

Conveyance Channel 030CC - 07132006

0

9837

9838

9839

9840

9841

9842

9843

9844

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

70

9831

9832

9833

9834

9835

9836

9837

9838

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

0

74

Page 75: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9856

9857

9858

9859

9860

9861

9862

9863

9864

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSA

Conveyance Channel 031CC - 07132006

9851

9852

9853

9854

9855

9856

9857

9858

9859

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

9845

9846

9847

9848

9849

9850

9851

9852

9853

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

75

Page 76: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9902

9904

9906

9908

9910

9912

9914

9916

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

XSA

Conveyance Channel 035CC - 08102006

0

9900

9902

9904

9906

9908

9910

9912

9914

9916

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

0

9876

9878

9880

9882

9884

9886

9888

9890

9892

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

0

76

Page 77: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9898

9900

9902

9904

9906

9908

9910

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSA

Conveyance Channel 037CC - 08162006

0

9891

9893

9895

9897

9899

9901

9903

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

70

9888

9890

9892

9894

9896

9898

9900

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

0

77

Page 78: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9898

9900

9902

9904

9906

9908

9910

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSA

Conveyance Channel 037CC - 08162006

0

9891

9893

9895

9897

9899

9901

9903

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

70

9888

9890

9892

9894

9896

9898

9900

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

0

78

Page 79: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9790

9791

9792

9793

9794

9795

9796

9797

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

XSA

Conveyance Channel 040CC - 08092006

9783

9784

9785

9786

9787

9788

9789

9790

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

9776

9777

9778

9779

9780

9781

9782

9783

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

79

Page 80: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10509 Conveyance Channel 058CC - 08132006

10508

10507

10506 XSA

10505 0 5 25 10 15 20 30

10498

10497 Elevation (ft)

10496

10495 XSB

10494 0 5 25 10 15 20 30

10489

10488

10487

10486 XSC

10485 0 5 25 10 15 20 30

Distance from LPIN (ft)

80

Page 81: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10810

10811

10812

10813

10814

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

XSA

Conveyance Channel 063CC - 08162006

10803

10804

10805

10806

10807

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

10793

10794

10795

10796

10797

0 5 10 15 20 25 30Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

81

Page 82: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9999

10000

10001

10002

10003

10004

0 5 10 15

XSA

Conveyance Channel 070CC - 08172006

20

9992

9993

9994

9995

9996

9997

0 5 10 15 20

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

9989

9990

9991

9992

9993

9994

0 5 10 15 20Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

82

Page 83: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

11878 Conveyance Channel 089CC - 07192006

11877

11876

11875

XSA11874

11873 0 5 10 15 40 45 20 25 30 35 50

11870

11869

11868 Elevation (ft)

11867

XSB11866

11865 0 5 10 15 40 45 20 25 30 35 50

11865

11864

11863

11862

XSC11861

11860 0 5 10 15 40 45 20 25 30 35 50

Distance from LPIN (ft)

83

Page 84: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

11912 Conveyance Channel 094CC - 08102006

11910

11908

11906

XSA11904

11902 0 5 10 15 40 45 20 25 30 35 50

11896

11894

11892 Elevation (ft)

11890

XSB11888

11886 0 5 10 15 40 45 20 25 30 35 50

11886

11884

11882

11880

XSC11878

11876 0 5 10 15 40 45 20 25 30 35 50

Distance from LPIN (ft)

84

Page 85: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

13088 Conveyance Channel 104CC - 08242006

13087

13086

13085

13084 XSA

13083

13082 0 10 50 20 30 40 60

13082

13081

13080 Elevation (ft)

13079

13078 XSB

13077

13076 0 50 10 20 30 40 60

13075

13074

13073

13072

13071 XSC

13070

13069 0 10 50 20 30 40 60

Distance from LPIN (ft)

85

Page 86: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

13109 Conveyance Channel 127CC - 08242006

13108

13107

13106

13105

13104 XSA

13103

13102 0 5 10 35 15 20 25 30 40

13099

13098

13097Elevation (ft)

13096

13095

13094 XSB

13093

13092 0 5 10 35 15 20 25 30 40

13090

13089

13088

13087

13086

13085 XSC

13084

13083 0 5 10 35 15 20 25 30 40

Distance from LPIN (ft)

86

Page 87: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9505

9506

9507

9508

9509

9510

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSA

Conveyance Channel 175CC - 08102006

0

9501

9502

9503

9504

9505

9506

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

70

9496

9497

9498

9499

9500

9501

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

0

87

Page 88: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9470

9475

9480

9485

9490

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9

XSA

Conveyance Channel 184CC - 05312006

0

9470

9475

9480

9485

9490

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

0

9474

9479

9484

9489

9494

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

88

Page 89: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

89

10407 Conveyance Channel 211CC - 08092006

10406

10405

10404

XSA10403

10402 0 5 10 35 15 20 25 30 40

10404

10403

10402 Elevation (ft)

10401

XSB10400

10399 0 5 10 35 15 20 25 30 40

10395

10394

10393

10392

XSC10391

10390 0 5 10 35 15 20 25 30 40

Distance from LPIN (ft)

Page 90: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

8784

8785

8786

8787

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

XSA

Conveyance Channel 216CC - 07192006

8777

8778

8779

8780

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

8769

8770

8771

8772

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

90

Page 91: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

8785

8786

8787

8788

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

XSA

Conveyance Channel 217CC - 07192006

8779

8780

8781

8782

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

8776

8777

8778

8779

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

91

Page 92: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

8990

8991

8992

8993

8994

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

XSA

Conveyance Channel 220CC - 07062006

80

8982

8983

8984

8985

8986

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

0

8977

8978

8979

8980

8981

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

0

92

Page 93: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9011

9012

9013

9014

9015

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

XSA

Conveyance Channel 221CC - 06282006

9002

9003

9004

9005

9006

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

8995

8996

8997

8998

8999

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

93

Page 94: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9005

9006

9007

9008

9009

9010

9011

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSA

Conveyance Channel 222CC - 06282006

8994

8995

8996

8997

8998

8999

9000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

8987

8988

8989

8990

8991

8992

8993

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

94

Page 95: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9691

9692

9693

9694

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

XSA

Conveyance Channel 223CC - 07062006

80

9687

9688

9689

9690

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

0

9679

9680

9681

9682

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

0

95

Page 96: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9506

9507

9508

9509

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSA

Conveyance Channel 224CC - 07122006

9503

9504

9505

9506

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

9499

9500

9501

9502

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

96

Page 97: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9782

9783

9784

9785

9786

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSA

Conveyance Channel 225CC - 07122006

9778

9779

9780

9781

9782

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

9772

9773

9774

9775

9776

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

97

Page 98: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9530

9531

9532

9533

9534

9535

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSA

Conveyance Channel 226CC - 07192006

0

9527

9528

9529

9530

9531

9532

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

70

9518

9519

9520

9521

9522

9523

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

0

98

Page 99: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9442

9443

9444

9445

9446

9447

9448

9449

9450

9451

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

XSA

Conveyance Channel 228CC - 07202006

9439

9440

9441

9442

9443

9444

9445

9446

9447

9448

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

9435

9436

9437

9438

9439

9440

9441

9442

9443

9444

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

99

Page 100: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9852

9853

9854

9855

9856

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSA

Conveyance Channel 229CC - 07132006

9850

9851

9852

9853

9854

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

9845

9846

9847

9848

9849

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

100

Page 101: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10247

10248

10249

10250

10251

0 10 20 30 40 50

XSA

Conveyance Channel 230CC - 07132006

60

10244

10245

10246

10247

10248

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

0

10241

10242

10243

10244

10245

0 10 20 30 40 50Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

60

101

Page 102: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

12084

12085

12086

12087

12088

12089

12090

12091

12092

12093

12094

12095

12096

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

XSA

Conveyance Channel 235CC - 07262006

12077

12078

12079

12080

12081

12082

12083

12084

12085

12086

12087

12088

12089

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

12067

12068

12069

12070

12071

12072

12073

12074

12075

12076

12077

12078

12079

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

102

Page 103: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

103

Appendix G

Sediment Ponds and Traps Silt Fence Site Visit Dates

and

Sediment Pond Cross Section

Graphs

2006

Page 104: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Survey Dates of Sediment Ponds and Traps Silt Fences 2006

Site ID Sediment Ponds and Traps Site Visit Dates 2006 002RW 5/8/2006 5/19/2006 5/26/2006 6/19/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 9/14/2006 9/20/2006 003RW 5/8/2006 5/10/2006 6/19/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 9/1/2006 9/20/2006 006RW 5/2/2006 5/8/2006 6/19/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 9/11/2006 9/20/2006 008RW 5/6/2006 5/23/2006 6/19/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 9/5/2006 9/20/2006009RA 5/6/2006 5/8/2006 6/19/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 8/30/2006 9/3/2006 9/20/2006 152RW 5/8/2006 5/10/2006 6/19/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 9/13/2006 9/20/2006 153RW 5/30/2006 7/27/2006 9/14/2006 161RW 5/23/2006 5/24/2006 8/17/2006 9/13/2006162RW 5/10/2006 5/18/2006 6/19/2006 6/26/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 9/6/2006 9/20/2006163RA 5/8/2006 5/21/2006 6/26/2006 176RW 5/8/2006 5/24/2006 6/26/2006 7/27/2006 8/17/2006 9/5/2006 9/7/2006178RW 5/8/2006 5/21/2006 5/24/2006 6/26/2006 7/27/2006 8/17/2006 9/7/2006 9/19/2006179RW 5/21/2006 5/24/2006 6/26/2006 7/27/2006 8/17/2006 9/7/2006 9/11/2006 180RW 5/11/2006 5/16/2006 5/23/2006 6/26/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 9/6/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006181RW 5/11/2006 5/16/2006 5/23/2006 6/26/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 9/7/2006 9/20/2006 200RW 5/4/2006 5/19/2006 6/19/2006 7/27/2006 8/17/2006 9/3/2006 201RW 5/8/2006 5/23/2006 6/19/2006 9/13/2006 202RW 5/8/2006 5/21/2006 5/24/2006 6/26/2006 7/27/2006 8/2/2006 8/17/2006 9/11/2006 9/20/2006 233RW 5/26/2006 234RW 5/31/2006 236RW 5/31/2006 237RW 5/31/2006

104

Page 105: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9495

9500

9505

9510

9515

9520

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

XSA

Sediment Pond Cross Section 199RW - 05312006

9490

9495

9500

9505

9510

9515

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

XSB

9485

9490

9495

9500

9505

9510

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

9480

9485

9490

9495

9500

9505

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

XSD

9480

9485

9490

9495

9500

9505

0 20 40 60 80 100 120Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

105

Page 106: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9495

9500

9505

9510

9515

9520

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

XSA

Sediment Pond Cross Section 199RW - 09272006

9490

9495

9500

9505

9510

9515

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

XSB

9485

9490

9495

9500

9505

9510

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

9480

9485

9490

9495

9500

9505

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

XSD

9480

9485

9490

9495

9500

9505

0 20 40 60 80 100 120Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

106

Page 107: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

12004

12007

12010

12013

12016

12019

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9

XSA

Sediment Pond Cross Section 237RW - 05312006

0

11997

12000

12003

12006

12009

12012

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSB

11996

11999

12002

12005

12008

12011

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSC

107

Page 108: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented
Page 109: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Appendix H

Stream Cross Section Graphs

2006

109

Page 110: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9394

9395

9396

9397

9398

9399

9400

9401

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSA

North Catamount Creek Reach 1 - 09272006

0

9394

9395

9396

9397

9398

9399

9400

9401

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSB

0

9394

9395

9396

9397

9398

9399

9400

9401

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

9393

9394

9395

9396

9397

9398

9399

9400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7

XSD

0

9393

9394

9395

9396

9397

9398

9399

9400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

110

Page 111: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9487

9488

9489

9490

9491

9492

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

XSA

North Catamount Creek Reach 2 - 09272006

9487

9488

9489

9490

9491

9492

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

XSB

9486

9487

9488

9489

9490

9491

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

9486

9487

9488

9489

9490

9491

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

XSD

9486

9487

9488

9489

9490

9491

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

111

Page 112: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9451

9452

9453

9454

9455

9456

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XSA

North Fork Crystal Creek Reach 1 - 05022006

0

9450

9451

9452

9453

9454

9455

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XSB

0

9449

9450

9451

9452

9453

9454

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

0

9448

9449

9450

9451

9452

9453

0 10 20 30 40 50 6

XSD

0

9446

9447

9448

9449

9450

9451

0 10 20 30 40 50 6Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

0

112

Page 113: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

9473

9474

9475

9476

9477

9478

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

XSA

North Fork Crystal Creek Reach 2 - 05022006

9471

9472

9473

9474

9475

9476

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

XSB

9471

9472

9473

9474

9475

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

9469

9470

9471

9472

9473

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

XSD

9468

9469

9470

9471

9472

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

113

Page 114: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10691

10692

10693

10694

10695

0 5 10 15 20

XSA

Severy Creek Reach 1 - 09022006

10690

10691

10692

10693

10694

0 5 10 15 20

XSB

10690

10691

10692

10693

10694

0 5 10 15 20

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

10690

10691

10692

10693

10694

0 5 10 15 20

XSD

10689

10690

10691

10692

10693

0 5 10 15 20Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

114

Page 115: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

10828

10829

10830

10831

10832

10833

10834

10835

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220

XSA

Severy Creek Reach 2 - 09022006

10819

10820

10821

10822

10823

10824

10825

10826

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220

XSB

10811

10812

10813

10814

10815

10816

10817

10818

10819

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

XSC

10803

10804

10805

10806

10807

10808

10809

10810

10811

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220

XSD

10795

10796

10797

10798

10799

10800

10801

10802

10803

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220Distance from LPIN (ft)

XSE

115

Page 116: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented
Page 117: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Appendix I

Stream Pebble Counts, Particle Size Distributions and Graphs

2006

117

Page 118: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Pebble Count Worksheet COMMENTS: ERO Reach

Particle Size (mm)

% finer than

Total Count STREAM NAME: North Catamount Ck

ID NUMBER: NCAT1<0.062 7% 22 DATE: 9/27/2006

0.062 - 0.125 11% 11 CREW: L. Howell, B. Waddell0.125 - 0.25 17% 19 Particle Size Distribution (mm)0.25 - 0.5 31% 40 D15 D35 D50 D84 D95 Lpart Year Graph0.5 - 1.0 43% 36 0.19 0.64 1.61 4.5 7.1 16.0 2006 Dashed

1 - 2 53% 32 0.10 0.78 2.81 8.5 12.6 20.0 2003 Solid2 - 4 81% 834 - 6 92% 326 - 8 97% 178 - 12 100% 712 - 16 100% 116 - 24 24 - 32 32 - 48 48 - 64 64 - 96 96 - 128 128 - 192 192 - 256 256 - 384 384 - 512 512 - 1024 1024 - 2048 2048 - 4096

BoulderSand CobbleSilt/Clay Gravel

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

Particle Size (mm)

Cum

ulat

ive

% F

iner

Tha

n

Percent of Total

118

Page 119: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Pebble Count Worksheet COMMENTS: Second reach 500 ft upstream of ERO reach

Particle Size (mm)

% finer than

Total Count STREAM NAME: North Catamount Ck

ID NUMBER: NCAT2<0.062 13% 40 DATE: 9/27/2006

0.062 - 0.125 19% 16 CREW: L. Howell, B. Waddell0.125 - 0.25 25% 18 Particle Size Distribution (mm)0.25 - 0.5 33% 24 D15 D35 D50 D84 D95 Lpart Year Graph0.5 - 1.0 42% 29 0.08 0.59 2.16 5.5 7.8 20.0 2006 Dashed

1 - 2 47% 14 0.11 2.00 3.56 9.7 15.1 28.0 2003 Solid2 - 4 74% 814 - 6 87% 386 - 8 96% 278 - 12 98% 612 - 16 100% 616 - 24 100% 124 - 32 32 - 48 48 - 64 64 - 96 96 - 128 128 - 192 192 - 256 256 - 384 384 - 512 512 - 1024 1024 - 2048 2048 - 4096

BoulderSand CobbleSilt/Clay Gravel

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

Particle Size (mm)

Cum

ulat

ive

% F

iner

Tha

n

Percent of Total

119

Page 120: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Pebble Count Worksheet COMMENTS: ERO Study Site

Particle Size (mm)

% finer than

Total Count STREAM NAME: North Fork Crystal Ck

ID NUMBER: NCRY1<0.062 6% 17 DATE: 5/3/2006

0.062 - 0.125 10% 12 CREW: J.Nankervis, S. Belz, B. Waddell, L. Howell0.125 - 0.25 13% 11 Particle Size Distribution (mm)0.25 - 0.5 18% 13 D15 D35 D50 D84 D95 Lpart Year Graph0.5 - 1.0 27% 27 0.33 2.17 3.72 12.2 20.5 36.0 2006 Dashed

1 - 2 33% 18 0.13 0.35 0.69 5.5 12.0 37.0 2003 Solid2 - 4 52% 584 - 6 63% 336 - 8 72% 268 - 12 84% 3612 - 16 91% 2316 - 24 97% 1824 - 32 99% 632 - 48 100% 248 - 64 64 - 96 96 - 128 128 - 192 192 - 256 256 - 384 384 - 512 512 - 1024 1024 - 2048 2048 - 4096

BoulderSand CobbleSilt/Clay Gravel

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

Particle Size (mm)

Cum

ulat

ive

% F

iner

Tha

n

Percent of Total

120

Page 121: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Pebble Count Worksheet COMMENTS: Second reach 500 ft upstream from ERO study site

Particle Size (mm)

% finer than

Total Count STREAM NAME: North Fork Crystal Ck

ID NUMBER: NCRY2<0.062 3% 10 DATE: 5/3/2006

0.062 - 0.125 5% 4 CREW: J.Nankervis, S. Belz, B. Waddell, L. Howell0.125 - 0.25 10% 15 Particle Size Distribution (mm)0.25 - 0.5 17% 22 D15 D35 D50 D84 D95 Lpart Year Graph0.5 - 1.0 30% 39 0.41 1.32 2.62 9.6 15.4 26.0 2006 Dashed

1 - 2 42% 37 0.13 0.45 1.05 5.9 13.6 55.0 2003 Solid2 - 4 62% 594 - 6 73% 336 - 8 79% 178 - 12 90% 3512 - 16 96% 1616 - 24 98% 824 - 32 100% 532 - 48 48 - 64 64 - 96 96 - 128 128 - 192 192 - 256 256 - 384 384 - 512 512 - 1024 1024 - 2048 2048 - 4096

BoulderSand CobbleSilt/Clay Gravel

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

Particle Size (mm)

Cum

ulat

ive

% F

iner

Tha

n

Percent of Total

121

Page 122: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Pebble Count Worksheet COMMENTS: ERO Reach

Particle Size (mm)

% finer than

Total Count STREAM NAME: Severy Ck

ID NUMBER: SVRY1<0.062 34% 101 DATE: 9/20/2006

0.062 - 0.125 44% 30 CREW: L. Howell, K. Howell, S. Winkler0.125 - 0.25 48% 12 Particle Size Distribution (mm)0.25 - 0.5 60% 36 D15 D35 D50 D84 D95 Lpart Year Graph0.5 - 1.0 71% 33 0.07 0.29 3.2 156.8 580.0 2006 Dashed

1 - 2 77% 19 0.06 0.21 2.9 664.0 4097.0 2003 Solid2 - 4 88% 324 - 6 92% 126 - 8 93% 38 - 12 93% 012 - 16 94% 316 - 24 94% 024 - 32 94% 032 - 48 94% 048 - 64 94% 064 - 96 94% 196 - 128 94% 1128 - 192 96% 4192 - 256 97% 5256 - 384 98% 3384 - 512 99% 3512 - 1024 100% 21024 - 2048 2048 - 4096

BoulderSand CobbleSilt/Clay Gravel

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

Particle Size (mm)

Cum

ulat

ive

% F

iner

Tha

n

Percent of Total

122

Page 123: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Pebble Count Worksheet COMMENTS: Second reach 1000 ft upstream of ERO reach

Particle Size (mm)

% finer than

Total Count STREAM NAME: Severy Ck

ID NUMBER: SVRY2<0.062 0% 0 DATE: 9/20/2006

0.062 - 0.125 12% 36 CREW: L. Howell, K. Howell, S. Winkler0.125 - 0.25 14% 5 Particle Size Distribution (mm)0.25 - 0.5 25% 35 D15 D35 D50 D84 D95 Lpart Year Graph0.5 - 1.0 30% 13 0.3 1.85 3.21 16.0 78.4 240.0 2006 Dashed

1 - 2 36% 18 0.4 1.42 6.63 70.3 296.7 400.0 2003 Solid2 - 4 57% 634 - 6 69% 366 - 8 74% 168 - 12 82% 2312 - 16 84% 716 - 24 86% 724 - 32 89% 832 - 48 93% 1148 - 64 93% 264 - 96 97% 1096 - 128 98% 4128 - 192 99% 3192 - 256 100% 3256 - 384 384 - 512 512 - 1024 1024 - 2048 2048 - 4096

BoulderSand CobbleSilt/Clay Gravel

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

Particle Size (mm)

Cum

ulat

ive

% F

iner

Tha

n

Percent of Total

123

Page 124: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented
Page 125: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Appendix J

Riparian Vegetation Description and Bank Photographs

2006

125

Page 126: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

126

Summary of Riparian Vegetation Description and Photo Points 2006

Photo Points

Site Date Camera Cross

Section Bank

Bank - Distance

from LPIN (ft)

Camera - Distance from

LPIN (ft) Percent Cover Comments

NCAT1 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 A Left 12.5 17.0 30 grass, forb, shrub NCAT1 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 A Right 16.5 12.0 100 grass, forb NCAT1 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 B Left 46.0 50.0 100 grass, sedge NCAT1 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 B Right 48.8 45.0 100 grass, sedge NCAT1 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 C Left 16.7 21.5 90 grass, sedge NCAT1 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 C Right 30.3 26.0 20 dirt, gravel NCAT1 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 D Left 26.0 30.0 90 sedge, shrub NCAT1 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 D Right 32.5 29.3 100 grass, sedge NCAT1 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 E Left 42.8 47.0 70 sedge NCAT1 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 E Right 45.1 41.0 90 sedge NCAT2 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 A Left 12.0 16.5 100 grass, sedge, shrub NCAT2 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 A Right 16.2 12.0 100 grass, sedge NCAT2 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 B Left 8.8 13.0 100 grass, sedge NCAT2 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 B Right 11.8 8.0 100 grass, sedge NCAT2 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 C Left 12.4 17.0 100 grass, sedge NCAT2 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 C Right 16.0 11.5 100 grass, sedge NCAT2 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 D Left 6.4 10.5 100 grass, sedge NCAT2 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 D Right 9.7 5.0 100 grass, sedge, forb NCAT2 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 E Left 10.5 14.0 100 grass, sedge, shrub NCAT2 092706 Olympus Stylus 400 E Right 13.1 9.5 100 grass, sedge, forb NCRY1 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 A Left 31.7 35.0 2 grass NCRY1 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 A Right 38.8 36.0 1 grass NCRY1 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 B Left 36.8 39.5 1 grass NCRY1 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 B Right 42.5 39.0 1 shrub NCRY1 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 C Left 26.7 29.0 0 gravel NCRY1 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 C Right 28.7 25.0 0 gravel NCRY1 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 D Left 30.0 32.8 0 gravel NCRY1 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 D Right 31.5 29.5 0 gravel NCRY1 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 E Left 30.5 33.7 0 gravel NCRY1 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 E Right 34.3 31.0 0 gravel

Red values denote distance change from 2004 Summary of Riparian Vegetation Description and Photo Points 2006

Page 127: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

Photo Points

Site Date Camera Cross

Section Bank

Bank - Distance

from LPIN (ft)

Camera - Distance from

LPIN (ft) Percent Cover Comments

NCRY2 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 A Left 11.0 15.5 0 sand, gravel NCRY2 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 A Right 20.6 15.0 5 grass, forb NCRY2 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 B Left 21.4 25.0 25 grass, forb NCRY2 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 B Right 30.0 26.0 5 moss, forb, shrub NCRY2 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 C Left 19.3 24.0 10 grass NCRY2 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 C Right 27.4 23.0 0 sand, gravel NCRY2 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 D Left 14.5 18.3 0 sand, gravel NCRY2 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 D Right 22.9 19.3 0 sand, gravel NCRY2 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 E Left 5.3 7.1 0 sand, gravel NCRY2 050306 Olympus Stylus 400 E Right 18.4 15.6 5 moss SVRY1 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 A Left 3.0 2.0 70 sedge, shrub SVRY1 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 A Right 7.8 4.0 50 sedge, shrub SVRY1 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 B Left 5.0 3.5 80 sedge, shrub SVRY1 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 B Right 8.9 10.0 90 sedge, shrub SVRY1 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 C Left 4.9 4.0 80 sedge, shrub SVRY1 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 C Right 7.8 5.0 70 sedge, f orb, shrub SVRY1 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 D Left 4.6 3.0 70 sedge, forb, shrub SVRY1 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 D Right 8.6 5.2 40 forb, shrub SVRY1 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 E Left 2.7 7.0 40 sedge, forb, shrub SVRY1 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 E Right 6.6 4.0 30 sedge, forb, shrub SVRY2 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 A Left 20.8 19.8 0 gravel, sand SVRY2 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 A Right 41.3 44.5 0 gravel, sand SVRY2 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 B Left 19.1 17.5 0 gravel, sand SVRY2 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 B Right 46.3 48.7 0 gravel, sand SVRY2 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 C Left 51.2 49.5 0 gravel, sand SVRY2 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 C Right 78.4 80.3 0 gravel, sand SVRY2 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 D Left 74.8 71.7 0 gravel, sand SVRY2 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 D Right 90.1 92.5 0 gravel, sand SVRY2 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 E Left 68.1 67.3 0 gravel, sand SVRY2 091004 Olympus Stylus 400 E Right 91.3 93.2 0 gravel, sand

Red values denote distance change from 2004

127

Page 128: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

128

Page 129: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

129

Page 130: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

130

Page 131: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

131

Page 132: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

132

Page 133: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating …...Report on 2006 Field Season Monitoring the Effectiveness and Validating Response to the Road Related Mitigation Practices Implemented

133