Is there a correlation between wind speed and ozone concentration in NC? Erin Cooper.
Monitoring of ozone ground concentration at temperature ... · Monitoring of ozone ground...
Transcript of Monitoring of ozone ground concentration at temperature ... · Monitoring of ozone ground...
Monitoring of ozone ground concentration at temperature inversions in the atmosphere Egor Iasenko1, Vladimir Chelibanov1, Alexander Marugin2
1 National Research University ITMO Saint-Petersburg
Russian Federation
1 JSC OPTEC Saint-Petersburg
Russian Federation
11th Annual International Symposium on Environment 23-26 May 2016, Athens, Greece
Temperature inversion, a reversal of the normal behavior of temperature in the troposphere (the region of the atmosphere nearest the Earth’s surface), in which a layer of cool air at the surface is overlain by a layer of warmer air. (Under normal conditions air temperature usually decreases with height.)
Introduction 1
Temperature Inversion
Pollutants (NO2, SO2, CnHx, CO and O3) become concentrated as more are added by everyday activities
1) Laboratory comparison studies of tree Analyzers: Thermo Electron Model TE49i (FEM based on UV-photometry), Bendix Model 8002 (FRM, based on homogeneous chemiluminescence) and Optec Model 3-02P-A, based on solid-state heterogeneous chemiluminescence.
2) Comparison field studies Monitoring of ozone ground concentration at temperature inversions in the atmosphere UV- photometry and solid-state heterogeneous chemiluminescence methods in Saint-Petersburg
2 Mission and Goals of work
Mission of our investigation: Provide correct monitoring of ozone ground concentration at temperature inversions in the atmosphere
3 O3 measurements methods
Homogeneous chemiluminescent (FRM)
Schematic illustration of the Bendix Model 8002
Method based on the chemiluminescence reaction of ethylene in gas phase (gas-phase titration) with O3:
accuracy, selectivity, sensitivity, danger, bulky, no portable
4 O3 measurements methods
Homogeneous chemiluminescent (FRM, Bendix Model 8002)
5 O3 measurements methods
UV-photometry (FEM)
Schematic illustration of the Thermo Electron Model TE49i
6 O3 measurements methods
UV-photometry (FEM, Thermo Electron Model TE49i)
The method uses the intensive band of O3 absorption in UV emission which maximum coincides with well-marked emission line of Hg vapors under low pressure at 253,7 nm:
quick, sensitivity, range, expensive
7 O3 measurements methods
Solid-State Chemiluminescent
Schematic illustration of the Model 3.02P-A O3 analyzer.
1. Valve 2. Chemiluminescent reactor 3. Calibrator 4. Photomultiplier tube 5. Analog-to-digital transformer 6. Processor 7. Digital indicator 8. Pump 9. Calibrator power supply 10.Control buttons (control keyboard) 11.Rotameter 12.Zero-gas filter
8 O3 measurements methods
Solid-State Chemiluminescent (Optec mod. 302P-A)
Method based on the solid-state chemiluminescence:
Accuracy Selectivity Sensitivity Portable Reasonable price
9 Experimental section
Comparability Model Optec 3.02 P-A with FEM and FRM
10 Experimental section
Comparability Model Optec 3.02 P-A with FEM and FRM
11
Mixing ChamberOptec Model
3.02P-A
PC
Scrubber
Exhaust
Model TE49i or Model 8002
Ozone GeneratorGS-024
Ambient Air80%
20%
Experimental section
Comparability Model Optec 3.02 P-A with FEM and FRM
Impurities of The ambient air: H2S, H2O, CO2
This comparability test was performed according to the procedures described in 40 Code Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 53.32
12
-0,10
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0:0
0
3:0
0
6:0
0
9:0
0
12
:00
15
:00
18
:00
21
:00
0:0
0
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n, p
pm
Time
OPTEC Model 3.02
Thermo Electron Model TE49i
Difference (ppm)
Experimental section
Comparability Model Optec 3.02 P-A with Thermo Electron Model TE49i (FEM)
-0,10
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0:0
0
3:0
0
6:0
0
9:00
12:0
0
15:0
0
18:0
0
21:0
0
0:0
0
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n, p
pm
Time
OPTEC Model 3.02Thermo Electron Model TE49iDifference (ppm)
-0,10
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0:00
3:00
6:00
9:00
12:0
0
15:0
0
18:0
0
21:0
0
0:00C
on
cen
trat
ion
, pp
m
Time
OPTEC Model 3.02Thermo Electron Model TE49iDifference (ppm)
13
Concentration
Range, ppm № Date Time
Concentration,
ppm
Pass/
Fail
JSC
OPTEC
Model
3.02P-A
Thermo
Electron
Inc. Model
TE49i
Low
0.06-0.10
1 7/12/10 11:30-12:30 0.09 0.10 Pass
2 7/12/10 16:02-17:01 0.08 0.09 Pass
3 7/13/10 10:00-10:59 0.09 0.08 Pass
4 7/13/10 15:04-16-03 0.09 0.08 Pass
5 7/14/10 10:44-11:42 0.09 0.09 Pass
Med.
0.15 – 0.25
1 7/12/10 14:07-15:06 0.20 0.20 Pass
2 7/12/10 17:05-17:59 0.20 0.21 Pass
3 7/13/10 11:00-11:59 0.20 0.18 Pass
4 7/13/10 13:03-14:02 0.19 0.18 Pass
5 7/14/10 9:40-10:39 0.19 0.20 Pass
High
0.35 – 0.45
1 7/12/10 13:07-14:05 0.39 0.38 Pass
2 7/12/10 15:08-16:00 0.38 0.38 Pass
3 7/13/10 12:03-13:01 0.38 0.36 Pass
4 7/13/10 14:03-15:02 0.37 0.36 Pass
Experimental section
Comparability Model Optec 3.02 P-A with Thermo Electron Model TE49i (FEM)
14
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n, p
pm
Time
Bendix Model 8002 FRM
Optec Model 3.02 P-A
Experimental section
Comparability Model Optec 3.02 P-A with Bendix Model 8002 (FRM)
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n, p
pm
Time
Bendix Model 8002 FRM
Optec Model 3.02 P-A
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n, p
pm
Time
Bendix Model…Optec Model…
15
Concentration
Range, ppm № Date Time
Concentration,
ppm
Pass/
Fail
JSC
OPTEC
Model
3.02P-A
Bendix
Model
8002
Low
0.06-0.10
1 12/29/10 12:06-13:05 0.079 0.080 Pass
2 12/29/10 16:25-17:24 0.081 0.083 Pass
3 12/30/10 10:47-11:45 0.091 0.093 Pass
4 12/31/10 09:50-10:49 0.087 0.089 Pass
5 12/31/10 12:11-13:10 0.092 0.094 Pass
Med.
0.15 – 0.25
1 12/29/10 14:15-15:14 0.205 0.207 Pass
2 12/29/10 09:42-10:41 0.195 0.197 Pass
3 12/30/10 11:49-12:48 0.190 0.193 Pass
4 12/31/10 14:00-14:59 0.195 0.195 Pass
5 12/31/10 11:00-11:59 0.197 0.198 Pass
High
0.35 – 0.45
1 12/29/10 13:11-14:10 0.404 0.406 Pass
2 12/29/10 15:20-16:19 0.406 0.409 Pass
3 12/30/10 12:56-13:53 0.395 0.398 Pass
4 12/31/10 08:45-09:43 0.403 0.403 Pass
Experimental section
Comparability Model Optec 3.02 P-A with Bendix Model 8002 (FRM)
16 Experimental section
Comparability Model 3.02 P-A with FEM under condition of temperature inversion
17 Experimental section
Comparability Model 3.02 P-A with FEM under condition of temperature inversion
Temperature inversion that was observed in lower troposphere on March 28-29, 2016 (http://www.flymeteo.org).
18
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
0,1
-0,001
0,004
0,009
0,014
0,019
18:28 20:52 23:16 1:40
O3 ,
pp
m
Time, min
NO
2 ,
pp
m
Optec Model 3.02 P-AThermo Electron Model TE49iNO2
Experimental section
Comparability Model 3.02 P-A with FEM under condition of temperature inversion
19
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
-0,001
0,004
0,009
0,014
0,019
18:28 20:52 23:16 1:40
O3
, p
pm
Time, min
Du
st (
PM
1),
mg/
m3
Optec Model 3.02 P-A
Thermo Electron Model TE49i
Dust (PM1)
Experimental section
Comparability Model 3.02 P-A with FEM under condition of temperature inversion
20
• The laboratory comparison of solid-state heterogeneous chemiluminescence analyzer OPTEC Model 3-02P-A with UV-photometry analyzer Thermo Electron mod.49i (FEM) and homogeneous chemiluminescence analyzer Bendix Model 8002 (FRM) was done successfully.
• The comparison of Model 3.02 P-A with Model 49i in real urban air in Saint-Petersburg under conditions of temperature inversion also was done. The obtained experimental data demonstrate the significant influence of atmospheric air components (NO2 and dust PM1.0) on the measurement of ozone concentration by UV-photometry method.
Due to all the above it can be concluded that ozone ground concentration at temperature inversion in the atmosphere
could be correctly identified by using the method of chemiluminescence only.
Conclusion
Our thanks to Gordyushkin Vitaly (engineer researcher) for carrying out environmental measurements.
21 Acknowledgments