Monetary Theory and Policy - Cristian Maravi Meneses · 2009. 12. 14. · MIU Model is originally...

28
Monetary Theory and Policy Money In Utility Function Econ. Juan Manuel Cisneros Jp. Cristian Marav Meneses [email protected] [email protected] San Marcos University October 2009 Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 1 / 15

Transcript of Monetary Theory and Policy - Cristian Maravi Meneses · 2009. 12. 14. · MIU Model is originally...

  • Monetary Theory and PolicyMoney In Utility Function

    Econ. Juan Manuel Cisneros Jp. Cristian Maraví [email protected] [email protected]

    San Marcos University

    October 2009

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 1 / 15

  • Background

    Ramsey(1928) and Solow(1956) Models provides the basic frameworkfor much of modern macroeconomics.

    Solow model becomes the foundation for dynamic stochastic modelsof the business cycle.

    The neoclassical growth model is a model of a nonmonetary economy,there is no medium of exchange, in other words there arent money(cashless economies) because hold money is costly.

    MIU Model is originally due to sidrauski(1967) but Patinkin in 1965provided an earlier discission of an MIU Model, although he does notintegrate capital accumulation into his model.

    We have assemed an ad- hoc money demand, without anyjustication.

    Now well introduce the real balances as an argument into utilityfunction.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 2 / 15

  • Background

    Ramsey(1928) and Solow(1956) Models provides the basic frameworkfor much of modern macroeconomics.

    Solow model becomes the foundation for dynamic stochastic modelsof the business cycle.

    The neoclassical growth model is a model of a nonmonetary economy,there is no medium of exchange, in other words there arent money(cashless economies) because hold money is costly.

    MIU Model is originally due to sidrauski(1967) but Patinkin in 1965provided an earlier discission of an MIU Model, although he does notintegrate capital accumulation into his model.

    We have assemed an ad- hoc money demand, without anyjustication.

    Now well introduce the real balances as an argument into utilityfunction.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 2 / 15

  • Background

    Ramsey(1928) and Solow(1956) Models provides the basic frameworkfor much of modern macroeconomics.

    Solow model becomes the foundation for dynamic stochastic modelsof the business cycle.

    The neoclassical growth model is a model of a nonmonetary economy,there is no medium of exchange, in other words there arent money(cashless economies) because hold money is costly.

    MIU Model is originally due to sidrauski(1967) but Patinkin in 1965provided an earlier discission of an MIU Model, although he does notintegrate capital accumulation into his model.

    We have assemed an ad- hoc money demand, without anyjustication.

    Now well introduce the real balances as an argument into utilityfunction.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 2 / 15

  • Background

    Ramsey(1928) and Solow(1956) Models provides the basic frameworkfor much of modern macroeconomics.

    Solow model becomes the foundation for dynamic stochastic modelsof the business cycle.

    The neoclassical growth model is a model of a nonmonetary economy,there is no medium of exchange, in other words there arent money(cashless economies) because hold money is costly.

    MIU Model is originally due to sidrauski(1967) but Patinkin in 1965provided an earlier discission of an MIU Model, although he does notintegrate capital accumulation into his model.

    We have assemed an ad- hoc money demand, without anyjustication.

    Now well introduce the real balances as an argument into utilityfunction.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 2 / 15

  • Background

    Ramsey(1928) and Solow(1956) Models provides the basic frameworkfor much of modern macroeconomics.

    Solow model becomes the foundation for dynamic stochastic modelsof the business cycle.

    The neoclassical growth model is a model of a nonmonetary economy,there is no medium of exchange, in other words there arent money(cashless economies) because hold money is costly.

    MIU Model is originally due to sidrauski(1967) but Patinkin in 1965provided an earlier discission of an MIU Model, although he does notintegrate capital accumulation into his model.

    We have assemed an ad- hoc money demand, without anyjustication.

    Now well introduce the real balances as an argument into utilityfunction.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 2 / 15

  • Background

    Ramsey(1928) and Solow(1956) Models provides the basic frameworkfor much of modern macroeconomics.

    Solow model becomes the foundation for dynamic stochastic modelsof the business cycle.

    The neoclassical growth model is a model of a nonmonetary economy,there is no medium of exchange, in other words there arent money(cashless economies) because hold money is costly.

    MIU Model is originally due to sidrauski(1967) but Patinkin in 1965provided an earlier discission of an MIU Model, although he does notintegrate capital accumulation into his model.

    We have assemed an ad- hoc money demand, without anyjustication.

    Now well introduce the real balances as an argument into utilityfunction.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 2 / 15

  • Assuptions

    For MIU Model well assume the following assuptions..

    Perfect competition in goods and labor markets.

    Fully exible prices and wages.

    No capital accumulation

    No scal sector.

    Closed Economy.

    The Function Utility include real balances, conssuption and labor.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 3 / 15

  • Assuptions

    For MIU Model well assume the following assuptions..

    Perfect competition in goods and labor markets.

    Fully exible prices and wages.

    No capital accumulation

    No scal sector.

    Closed Economy.

    The Function Utility include real balances, conssuption and labor.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 3 / 15

  • Assuptions

    For MIU Model well assume the following assuptions..

    Perfect competition in goods and labor markets.

    Fully exible prices and wages.

    No capital accumulation

    No scal sector.

    Closed Economy.

    The Function Utility include real balances, conssuption and labor.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 3 / 15

  • Assuptions

    For MIU Model well assume the following assuptions..

    Perfect competition in goods and labor markets.

    Fully exible prices and wages.

    No capital accumulation

    No scal sector.

    Closed Economy.

    The Function Utility include real balances, conssuption and labor.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 3 / 15

  • Assuptions

    For MIU Model well assume the following assuptions..

    Perfect competition in goods and labor markets.

    Fully exible prices and wages.

    No capital accumulation

    No scal sector.

    Closed Economy.

    The Function Utility include real balances, conssuption and labor.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 3 / 15

  • Assuptions

    For MIU Model well assume the following assuptions..

    Perfect competition in goods and labor markets.

    Fully exible prices and wages.

    No capital accumulation

    No scal sector.

    Closed Economy.

    The Function Utility include real balances, conssuption and labor.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 3 / 15

  • Households problemPreferences

    PrefencesWell modify the households problem in two ways:.

    First modication.

    Prefrences now are given by:

    E0

    (∞

    ∑t=0

    βtU(Ct ,MtPt,Nt )

    )(1)

    Where Mt : Denotes holding of money in periot t.Well assume that period utility is increasing and concave in real balancesMtPt.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 4 / 15

  • Households problemBugdet constraint

    Households bugdet costraint.

    Second Modication.

    The ow budget constraint incorporates monetary holdings explicitly,taking the following form:

    PtCt +Mt + Bt = PtWt + (1+ it�1)Bt�1 +Mt�1 (2)

    Where it : is the ineterest rate, or opportunity cost of holding money.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 5 / 15

  • Optimality ConditionsLagrange equation

    The households problem consist in maximizing (1) subject to (2).

    Max V = E0

    (∞

    ∑t=0

    βtU(Ct ,MtPt,Nt )

    )Subject to:

    PtCt +Mt + Bt = PtWt + (1+ it�1)Bt�1 +Mt�1

    L = E0

    (∞

    ∑t=0

    βt�U(Ct , MtPt ,Nt ) + λ(PtWt + (1+ it�1)Bt�1 + ...

    +Mt�1 � PtCt �Mt � Bt )

    �)(3)

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 6 / 15

  • Optimality ConditionsFirst order condition

    The rst order conditions is given by operating the rst partial derivates:∂L

    ∂Ct; ∂L

    ∂MtPt; ∂L∂Nt ;

    ∂L∂Bt

    Eulers condition

    UCtβE fUCt+1g

    = (1+ it )Pt

    E fPt+1g(4)

    Labor Market�UNtUCt

    =WtPt

    (5)

    demand for real balances

    UMtPt

    UCt=

    �it

    1+ it

    �(6)

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 7 / 15

  • Optimality ConditionsLog- linear form

    As we can note two of the last three expretions which we have was foundin the clasical model or cashless economy where the demand for moneywas ad-hoc, in contrast now it is found from a optimal decition withmicrofundaments.The log- linear form of the demand of money is:

    UmtUct

    = it

    To utility function we can get two cases:

    Utility separable in real balances =) neutrality

    Utility non separable in real balances =) non- superneutrality

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 8 / 15

  • Optimality ConditionsLog- linear form

    As we can note two of the last three expretions which we have was foundin the clasical model or cashless economy where the demand for moneywas ad-hoc, in contrast now it is found from a optimal decition withmicrofundaments.The log- linear form of the demand of money is:

    UmtUct

    = it

    To utility function we can get two cases:

    Utility separable in real balances =) neutralityUtility non separable in real balances =) non- superneutrality

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 8 / 15

  • A separable utility functionUtility especication

    The households utility function have the following form:

    U�Ct ,

    MtPt,Nt

    �=C 1�σt1� σ +

    (Mt/Pt )1�υ

    1� υ �N1+ϕt1+ ϕ

    (7)

    As we can note the utility function is separable, in other words, themarginal utility depends only of the argumen(for example, thecomsumptions marginal utility depends only of comsumption).

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 9 / 15

  • Optimality ConditionsFirst order condition

    The rst order conditions is taken from (4), (5) and (6)Eulers condition

    C�σtβE�C�σt+1

    = (1+ it ) PtE fPt+1g (8)Labor Market

    Nϕt Cσt =

    WtPt

    (9)

    demand for real balances

    MtPt= C

    συ

    �1+

    1it

    � 1υ

    (10)

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 10 / 15

  • Optimality ConditionsLog- linear form

    Using the rst- order Taylor aproximation and the log- linearization theory,we can get:

    ct = E�ct+1 �

    1σit +

    πt+1

    �ϕnt + σct = wt � pt

    mt � pt =σ

    υct �

    1υit

    Where η = 1/υ, and the particular case where σ = υ and for generalequilibrium we have:

    mt � pt = yt � ηit (11)

    Now it is founded by optimal decition of rational consumer1.As the conclutions of this model is same to the clasical model, so wecan say that when the utility function is separable, the money isneutral and superneutral, because it doesnt a¤ect at the realvariables.

    1In contrast to ad- hoc preposition which was input in a clasical model.Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 11 / 15

  • Optimality ConditionsLog- linear form

    Using the rst- order Taylor aproximation and the log- linearization theory,we can get:

    ct = E�ct+1 �

    1σit +

    πt+1

    �ϕnt + σct = wt � pt

    mt � pt =σ

    υct �

    1υit

    Where η = 1/υ, and the particular case where σ = υ and for generalequilibrium we have:

    mt � pt = yt � ηit (11)Now it is founded by optimal decition of rational consumer1.

    As the conclutions of this model is same to the clasical model, so wecan say that when the utility function is separable, the money isneutral and superneutral, because it doesnt a¤ect at the realvariables.

    1In contrast to ad- hoc preposition which was input in a clasical model.Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 11 / 15

  • Optimality ConditionsLog- linear form

    Using the rst- order Taylor aproximation and the log- linearization theory,we can get:

    ct = E�ct+1 �

    1σit +

    πt+1

    �ϕnt + σct = wt � pt

    mt � pt =σ

    υct �

    1υit

    Where η = 1/υ, and the particular case where σ = υ and for generalequilibrium we have:

    mt � pt = yt � ηit (11)Now it is founded by optimal decition of rational consumer1.As the conclutions of this model is same to the clasical model, so wecan say that when the utility function is separable, the money isneutral and superneutral, because it doesnt a¤ect at the realvariables.

    1In contrast to ad- hoc preposition which was input in a clasical model.Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 11 / 15

  • A non separable utility functionUtility especication

    The households utility function have the following form:

    U�Ct ,

    MtPt,Nt

    �=C 1�σt1� σ +

    (Mt/Pt )1�υ

    1� υ �N1+ϕt1+ ϕ

    (12)

    As we can note the utility function is separable, in other words, themarginal utility depends only of the argumen(for example, thecomsumptions marginal utility depends only of comsumption).

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 12 / 15

  • References 1

    Sidrauski, M., Rational Choice and Patterns of Growth in aMonetary Economy,American Economic Review, 57(2), May 1967,534544.

    Patinkin, D., Money, Interest, and Prices: An Integration ofMonetary and Value Theory, 2nd ed., New York: Harper & Row, 1965.

    Galí, Jordie. Monetary policy, ination and the business cycle. CREIand UPF. 2004.

    Walsh, Carl. Monetary Theory and Policy. Second edition. MIT press.2003.

    Woodford, Michael: The Optimum Quantity of Money,inB.M.Friedman and F.H. Hahn, eds. Handbook of MonetaryEconomics, vol II, Elsevier-Science. 1990.

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 13 / 15

  • References 2

    Quispe, Zenon. Teoría Monetaria. Notas de Clase. PUCP, 2009

    Quintana, Derry. Aspectos intertemporales de la demanda pordinero. 2006.

    Castillo, Paul. Los fundamentos de la Demanda por dinero. Notas declase UNI. 2009

    Jimenes, Felix. Macroeconomía. Enfoques y modelos. PUCP. 2002.

    King, Robert G., and Mark Watson: Money, Prices, InterestRates,and the Business Cycle,Review of Economics and Statistics, vol 58,no 1, 35-53. 1995

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 14 / 15

  • Monetary Theory and PolicyUNMSM

    ¡Many Thanks!.

    Juan Manuel [email protected]

    .Cristian Maraví [email protected]

    [email protected]:cristianmaravi.blogspot

    Monetary Theory and Policy (UNMSM) MIU Model 10/09 15 / 15

    BackgroundBackground

    AssuptionsAssuptions

    HouseholdHousehold

    Optimality conditionsOptimality conditions

    A separable utility functionUtility especificationOptimality Conditions

    A non separable utility functionUtility especification

    ReferencesReferences

    ThanksThanks