Molecular Dynamics simulations Bert de Groot Max Planck institute for biophysical chemistry...
-
Upload
oswin-benson -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Molecular Dynamics simulations Bert de Groot Max Planck institute for biophysical chemistry...
Molecular Dynamics simulationsMolecular Dynamics simulations
Bert de Groot
Max Planck institute for biophysical chemistry
Göttingen, Germany
Molecular Dynamics SimulationsMolecular Dynamics Simulations
Schrödinger equation
Born-Oppenheimer approximation
Nucleic motion described classically
Empirical force field
Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Interatomic interactions
Molecular dynamics-(MD) simulations of Biopolymers
• Motions of nuclei are described classically, .N,...,),,...,(Edt
dm)( Nela 112
2
RRR
• Potential function Eel describes the electronic influence on motions of the nuclei and is approximated empirically „classical MD“:
...,)EEE(EEEE vdW,
.rep,
.Coul,
kwinkelDihedral
dihek
iBindungen
jwinkelBindungs
anglej
bondiel
approximated
exact
Eibond
|R|0
KBT {
Covalent bonds Non-bonded interactions
==R
„Force-Field“
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Molecule: (classical) N-particle system
Newtonian equations of motion: )r(Frdt
dm iii
2
2
)()( rVrF ii
)r,...,r(r N
1with
Integrate numerically via the „leapfrog“ scheme:
(equivalent to the Verlet algorithm)
with
Δt 1fs!
BPTI: Molecular Dynamics (300K)
Computational task:
Solve the Newtonian equations of motion:
Non-bonded interactionsNon-bonded interactions
Lennard-Jones potential Coulomb potential
Use of constraints toUse of constraints toincrease the integration stepincrease the integration step
The „SHAKE“ algorithm
Δt = 1fs --> 2 fs
Molecular dynamics is very expensive ... Example: F1-ATPase in water (183 674 atoms), 1 nanosecond:
106 integration steps
8.4 * 1011 flop per step [n(n-1)/2 interactions]
total: 8.4 * 1017 flop
on a 100 Mflop/s workstation: ca 250 years
...but performance has been improved by use of:
multiple time stepping ca. 25 years
+ structure adapted multipole methods ca. 6 years
+ FAMUSAMM ca. 2 years
+ parallel computers ca. 55 days
Limits of MD-Simulations
• classical description: chemical reactions not described poor description of H-atoms (proton-transfer) poor description of low-T (quantum) effects simplified electrostatic model simplified force field
• only small systems accessible (104 ... 106 atoms)
• only short time spans accessible (ps ... μs)
MD-Experiments with Argon Gas
Role of environment - solventRole of environment - solvent
explicit
or
implicit?
box
or
droplet?
periodic boundary conditions and the minimum image convention
Surface (tension) effects?
Proteins jump between many, hierarchically ordered „conformational substates“
H. Frauenfelder et al., Science 229 (1985) 337
Reversible Folding Dynamics of a β-Peptide
X. Daura, B. Jaun, D. Seebach, W.F. van Gunsteren, A.E. Mark, J. Mol. Biol. 280 (1998) 925
MD Simulations
• external coupling: temperature (potential truncation, integration errors) pressure (density equilibration) system translation/rotation
• analysis
energies (individual terms, pressure, temperature) coordinates (numerical analysis, visual inspection!) mechanisms