MOI UNIVERSITY AGSHARE PROJECT … · ward for i presentation ted. The m ended pra adoption o to...
-
Upload
doannguyet -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of MOI UNIVERSITY AGSHARE PROJECT … · ward for i presentation ted. The m ended pra adoption o to...
PROCEE
Wo
M
EDINGS O
orkshop par
MOI UNIV
OF STAKEH
rticipants.
VERSITY A
HOLDERSKENYA O
AGSHARE
1
S WORKSHON 28/02/20
PROJECT
HOP HELD011- 1/3/201
T
D AT ASIS 11
HOTEL E
ELDORET,
,
Executive AgShare Pstakeholderenhance exfindings ofin the twosubsectors.discussionsworkshop w
1.
2.
3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
8. 9.
Overall it resolution to industrie
M
Summary Project Stakrs in the ag
xchange of if the Agsharo sub-sector. The workss of issues were:
Farmers’ pmeasures sfacing farmservice. CollaboratiidentificatiRole of smFarmers neFarmers shBottleneckCollaboratiavoid dupliWhole valuResearch-Edemonstrat
was notedof agricultues and also e
MOI UNIV
keholders wgricultural sideas and shre Maize anrs and brainshop was intemerging f
practices dshould be pumers in mai
ion among son.
mall scale traeed to be enlhould be assis in maize aion and coorication and ue chain appExtension-Ftions.
d that multural problemenables rese
VERSITY A
workshop at sector who haring of expnd Dairy subnstorm on tteractive anfrom the pa
do not matut in place tize/dairy su
stakeholders
aders in maizlightened onisted to devand milk mardination is gaps in servproach shouarmer linka
ti-stakeholdems is the wayearchers to d
AGSHARE
2
Moi Univeincluded faperiences. Mbsector survthe way for
nd involved apers presen
ch recommto facilitate ubsector and
s is needed i
ze/dairy neen the best pr
velop proposarketing shoneeded amo
vice deliveryuld be adoptage should b
er approachy to go sincdraw their re
PROJECT
ersity was haculty, reseaMore specifiveys, isolatinrward for ipresentation
nted. The m
mended praadoption o
d to strengt
in research,
eds to be enractices in msals for acquould be tacklong organizy. ed in resear
be strengthen
h to develoce it enhanceesearch prob
T
held to faciarchers, studfically the wng challengimproving pns by resour
major issues
actices; it wf technologthen govern
capacity bu
hanced thromaize and dauisition of cled. zations deali
rch and extened through
opment of es relevanceblems from
ilitate interadents, etc. a
work aimed aes faced by performancerce persons
s that emerg
was recommgies, to tacklnment (GOK
uilding and
ough capacitairy. redit.
ing with far
ension. h on-farm tri
teaching me of teachinthe commu
action of keand thereforat sharing thstakeholder
e of the twbefore pan
ged from th
mended thle constrainK) extensio
problem
ty building.
rmers to
ials and
materials anng curriculumunities.
ey re he rs
wo el he
at nts on
nd m
1. Introd
AgShare P“EconomicCollaboratimarketing number of along the mmodule thalearn in thstakeholdermodule, bustakeholder
2. WORK To
To
To
3. WORK
DAY OTIME 8.00 a.m
9.00 a.m10.00 a
10.30-111.00-1
11.30 a
12.00 a
M
uction
Project at Moc role of priive Mastersand price a
f stakeholdemaize and dat exposes mheory to ther involvemut also to grs in the res
KSHOP OBshare the fin
isolate the m
brainstorm
KSHOP PR
ONE
m-9.00 a.m
m-10.00 a.ma.m-10.30 a.
11.00 a.m 11.30 a.m
a.m-12.00 a.
a.m.-1.00 p.m
MOI UNIV
oi Universitices and apps in Agricuanalysis. Thers who incdairy value masters stude occurrencent was megive back tspective com
BJECTIVEndings of th
main challen
on the way
ROGRAM
MAA
O
m. O.m. A
sTTov
.m ToW
m. P
VERSITY A
ty was initiaproaches to
ultural and Ahe developmcluded studechains. The
dents to theoces in the reant to not to the comm
mmodity val
ES he Agshare M
nges faced b
forward for
MONDAY ACTIVITYArrival and
OPENING
Opening ReAgShare masurvey reporTea Break Technical prof maize brevalue chainTechnical Pof maize libWho gains wPresentation
AGSHARE
3
ated with tho market anaApplied Ecment of thisents, farmere rationale ooretical conreal worldonly impro
munity in tlue chains.
Maize and D
by key stake
r improving
28TH FEBRY
registration
SESSION
emarks aize Stakehort
resentation eeding in th
resentation eralization iwho loses?n on the Rol
PROJECT
e purpose oalysis” whiconomics (Cs module wrs, faculty, of this approncepts, but a
via use of ove the appterms of ad
Dairy subse
eholders in
g performanc
RUARY 20
n
olders
on the role e maize
on impact in Kenya:
le of
T
of developinch is the fir
CMAAE) cowas done th
researchersoach was toalso enablesf case studipropriatenesddressing is
ctor surveys
the two sub
ce of the tw
11 FacilitatMr. FranMs. ChriChair : DNyangwProf. M. Ms. Chri
Dr. L. M
Dr. L. M
DAO Ua
ng a modulerst topic in ourse titled rough invol
s and other o not only es them to linies. Additioss and relevssues raised
s
b-sectors
wo subsector
tor ncis Oduor istine UlumDr. P.
weso Odhiambo
istine Ulum
Mose (KARI
Mose(KARI-
asin Gishu
e for the topithe RegionAgricultur
lvement of stakeholder
end up with nk what the
onally, multvance of th
d by the ke
rs.
ma
ma
-HQs)
-Hqs)
ic al al a
rs a
ey ti-he ey
1.00 p.m2.00 p.m
2.30 p.m
DAY T9.00 a.m
9.30 a.m
10.30-111.00-1
11.45 a
12.30 a
1.00 p.m2.00 p.m
3.30 p.m
4. Works
4.1 Officia
Chair: Dr.
Prof Mark overview oMelinda Gstaff, studeopen educareported thAgShare pand milk sinvolved in
M
m.-2.00pm m. -2.30 p.m
m.-4.00 p.m
TWO m-9.30 a.m.
m-10.30 a.m
11.00 a.m 11.45 a.m
a.m-12.30 a.
a.m.-1.00 p.m
m.-2.00pm m. -3.30 p.m
m.-4.00 p.m
shop presen
al opening r
. Philip Nya
Odhiambo,of the proje
Gates Foundents and farational resouhat Neil Butroject. He e
safety in Ugn developm
MOI UNIV
MvL
m. To
m. PpT
. To
m ToTAs
.m PMD
m. PDvL
m. Pf
m. O
ntations
remarks by
angweso
the Projectect progress
dation aimedrmers. He eurces for altcher heads explained thganda whic
ment of a m
VERSITY A
Ministry of value chainLUNCH BRTechnical prof CGA in tPlenary discpresentationTuesday, MTechnical prof EAGC inTechnical prof KMDP inTEA BREAAgShare Dasurvey reporPresentationMinistry of DevelopmenPresentationDairy Boardvalue chainLUNCH BRPlenary discforward Official clos
y Prof Mark
t team leades. He indicd at developexplained thl disciplinesOER-Afric
hat Makererch emphasizmodule for
AGSHARE
4
Agriculture
REAK resentation the maize vacussion on dns
MARCH 1, 2resentation
n the maize vresentation n the maize AK airy Stakehort n on the RolLivestock nt in milk van on the Rold(KDB) in t
REAK cussion on w
sing
k Odhiamb
er, welcomeated that A
pment and shat MSU ans. These resca and that re Universitzes safety, mfarmer org
PROJECT
e in maize
on the role alue chain day’s
2011 on the role value chainon the role value chain
olders
le of
alue chain le of Kenyathe milk
way
bo
d participanAgshare is asharing of l
nd OER-Afrsources inclufour Univerty’s mandatmarketing aanization a
T
MR. Nel
Mr. Den
Irene Tar
n Jane Tum
Mr. Fran
DLPO U
a KDB Ar
DR. P. N
Prof Odh
nts to the woan initiativeiterature in
rica are engude books, rsities in thete is a projeand value aaimed at tra
lson Sumba
is Otieno
rus
m
ncis Oduor
Uasin Gishu
rea Manager
Nyangweso
hiambo
orkshop ande of MSU agriculture
gaged in devpapers and e region are
ect in Dairyaddition. USansforming
r
d gave a brieand Bill an for teachinvelopment omanuals. H
e involved iy Value chaiSIU-Africa farmers int
ef nd ng of
He in in is to
commerciaMasters inmodule forcourse Agrstudents, fMelinda Gmainly rese 4.2 AgSha
A summary
M
al entreprenen Agriculturr the topic ricultural mfarmers andGates Foundearch in HI
are maize st
y of present
Produthe de
An effor incprodu
MOI UNIV
eurs. Haramral and App“Economic
marketing and other stakedation is invIV/AIDS , fo
takeholders
tations is giv
FINDINGS UNIVERSITY AG
STAKEHOLDEVALUPRES
ULUMA
Febru
INTRO
uction and marketevelopment proce
fficient marketing creased and sustucts as it stimulate
VERSITY A
maya and Mplied Econoc role of prnd price anaeholders whvolved in a food security
s survey rep
ven in slide
FROM THE MOIGSHARE SURVEERS IN THE MAIUE CHAIN.ENTED BY :
A CHRISTINE
uary 2011
ODUCTION: cont
ting are a continuess
system is a pre-reained developmees production
AGSHARE
5
Moi Universiomics (CMrices and apalysis. This ho providednumber of
y in Africa a
port by Ms
form.
I EY OF
ZE
td
um in
equisite nt of the
PROJECT
ity which arMAAE) prog
pproaches tis module
d case studif developmeand Agricul
s Christine
lack of rur
The majormaize sub low sounrelia pest in poor in marke low pr
T
re participatgram were to market aI for M. Scies. He furtent activitieltural develo
Uluma
INTRODUCT
ral finance and poorly
r constraints affectb-sector include:oil fertility, able rainfall,nfestation,nfrastructure,eting and policy botrofitability
ting in the Cmandated t
analysis” inc. Level whther noted t
es which incopment in A
TION: contd
developed markets
ting growth of the
ttlenecks and,
Collaborativto develop
n the masterhich involvethat Bill anclude health
Africa.
e
ve a
rs ed nd h-
M
Maize
Abouannu
The sorganof far
The s
U
m
Targethe m
Data w2010
Respoquest
Separactor fam t tO
MOI UNIV
IN
e is the main stap
ut 1.6 million hectaally.
sector is both technizationally complrming characterizelow productivity an
poor infrastructure
MEstudy was carried the maize surplus
Ugishu Counties) a
maize deficit areas
et population was maize value chain
S
was generated throu
ondents were intervitionnaire. rate questionnaires ws in the maize value armers,maize millers,raders, ransporters, and
Other key informants
VERSITY A
NTRODUCTION
ple food in Kenya
ares are under ma
hnologically and ex due to dynami
ed by:nd low use of farm
e,
ETHODOLOGYout in two regionareas (Trans-Nzoi
and
s (Machackos Coun
all the stakeholdein Kenya
Study design
ugh a survey in Nove
iewed using a structu
were prepared for thchain including:
AGSHARE
6
aize
c nature
inputs,
s:a and
nty)..
ers in
ember
ured
he key
PROJECT
To comprecommvalue chTo find o
farmers maize vaTo recom
problem
M
The sam36 m
10 t
3 tra
3 m
8 co
The samsystema
Data collecteconomic
Maize surplUasin‐Gishupurposively
T
OBJE
pare and contrast ended practices i
hain by the differenout the constraintsand other stakehoalue chain.mmend possible ss.
METHODOLOG
mple size comprisemaize farmers
traders
ansporters
millers
onsumers
mple was selectedatic random sampl
Study d
ted included biolog
us and deficit areasu, Trans‐Nzoia and m selected.
CTIVES
best and n the maize nt stakeholders.s faced by older in the
solutions to these
GY: contd
ed of:
d using ling
design
ical and socio‐
s which included; machakos were
M
Don
Groprof
Desmearela
c
L
Inadequ
CO
NST
RAIN
T
Thvalfun
Limcouma
Ma
MOI UNIV
Dane using (SPSS) and Micro
ss margin analysis was dofitability of an ideal and a
scriptive statistics such asasures of central tendencytionships between variab
FIND
0 10 20 30
capital,
rop diseases and pests,
marketing,
Lack of improved inputs
Poor infrastructure,
uate extension services,
land scarcity
labour scarcity
Drought
FARMER’S C
FINDhe performance oflue chain is highlynctioning of the tra
mited transportatiountry limits the effarkets.
any traders don’t s
VERSITY A
ata Analysis soft excels
one to compare level of verage maize farm
s bar charts percentages y were used to describe ebles.
DINGS: contd
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
PERCENTAGE
CONSTRAINTS
DINGS: contdf the millers in the y dependent on thaders and transpo
on capacity in theficiency of maize
store grain.
AGSHARE
7
and emerging
Surplus area%
Deficit area%
he orters.
PROJECT
Com
Def
Comparisoncategory
Farpra
Gross margin Ksh
Maize seed 7Kg
DAP 25K
CAN 10K
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Min
7
2.8
YIEL
D
The strucsignificanlevels.
small-scamarkets t
small-svillage
Decreasmarket o
T
FINDIN
mparison of farpractic
ficit areas(ha) S
rmersactice
recommended Fp
hs.415 Kshs.4,890 K
g 20Kg 1
Kg 80Kg 5
Kg 80Kg 5
FINDING
Max Average Best Pra
36
19
38
20
7.19
YIELD PER REGION
FINDINGcture of Kenya’s maizntly depending on na
ale farmers have a vathrough which to sel
scale assemblers oplevel
sing importance ofoption for farmers
NGS
rmers and best ces
Surplus areas(ha)
Farmers practice
recommended
Kshs.8,260 Kshs.11,170
11Kg 25Kg
50Kg 150Kg
50Kg 150Kg
GS contd
actise
20
N
YIELD PER REGION Maize surplus
YIELD PER REGION Maize deficit
GS: contdze market change
ational production
ariety of potential l maize.
perating at the
f NCPB as a
s
t
M
REASEC
SOLU
TIO
N
Maizfollowmaizseve› ca› cro› infr› ex› im› ma› dr
Short-– Stim
• T• E
Long-– Prod
• E• Im
Mosaffecagric
An imaizappthe c
MOI UNIV
FIND
0 10 20 30
GOVERNMENT
NGO/CBOS
FARMERS
CH INSTITUTIONS
FARMER'S
COe farmers in both rwing as the constrae productivity, listere:
apital, , op diseases and perastructure,xtension services,
mproved inputs, , laarketing,rought, soil erosion
Polic
-termmulating productionTargeted fertilizer/seed suppoExpansion of irrigation
termductivity enhancing inve
Expansion of irrigation; roadsmproving access to producti
– Working with private sector farmers
CONCLUS
st of the constraincting the same gocultural productio
nterdisciplinary aze value chain resropriate strategy tconstraints.
VERSITY A
DINGS: contd
40 50 60 70 80 90
PERCENTAGE
S SOLUTIONS
ONCLUSIONregions perceive thaints limiting increaed from the most to
ests,
nd scarcity, labour
and theft.
cy suggestion
ort for short rains season
estmentss & railway infrastructure; R&ivity enhancing inputsr to improve access to seeds an
SION contd…
ts are interrelatedoal of increasing n,
pproach in the cosearch will be an to follow in addres
AGSHARE
8
SURPLUS%
DEFICIT%
e ased least
scarcity,
ns
&D
nd fertilizers by
……..
d and
ntext of
ssing
PROJECT
The impgrain die
Market cacross in
Spatial and defic
Most rethe sourproblem
Many orequireimp
markreseinpu
signpeop
Peopleneed toconstraintsFarmerssystem ha
T
FINDINGS:
portance of maize et is shown to hav
channels for acquncome groups
price margins betcit regions are als
CONCLUSION
spondents view grce of solutions to
ms.of the constraintsgovernment actiorovements in inketing,earch and extensiouts, as prerequificant developmeple themselves.
CONCLUSION
ought to be edufind or initiat
s facing them by ts feel that theas improved.
contd
in urban staple ve declined
uiring maize vary
tween surplus so low.
N contd………..
government as o most of their
s identified wouldon such as:nfrastructure and
onfarmuisites for anynt initiated by the
contd………..
ucated about thete solutions tothemselvesmaize marketing
d
d
ye
eo
g
Reactio
Q- Mrsdriven e A-Mr. individuextensio Prof. Oservice, exclaim Mr. Chahead orather th
M
ons from au It wa It w
ecol Min
apprproj
It wreso
s. Asha, a extension ap
Mwambezual needs thon package f
Odhiambo: extension o
med that “the
hesereck, Aof Governmhan waiting
MOI UNIV
udience as noted tha
was also notlogical zonenistry of Agroach & pect(NALEP
was reportedorted to dem
farmer - qpproach? Wh
zi, a Minishat need to for each one
Noted thatofficers waie governmen
A Kenya Dment in prov
for farmers
VERSITY A
at about 30%ted that inpues. griculture isprojects sucP) which used that sinc
mand driven questioned hy not come
stry of Agbe express
e of them.
t while the it for the farnt may have
Dairy Boardvision of exs to solicit fo
AGSHARE
9
% of cerealsut applicatio
s still activech as natioe focal area ce resourcesextension apwhy the me and educa
griculture sed before e
farmer waitrmer to repoe changed th
d official: Extension to for interventi
PROJECT
lost in storaon rates for
ely involveonal agricuapproach s are limitepproach.
ministry of Aate us period
official- Exextension ag
ts for extenort a problemhe approach
Explained tfarmers by ions.
T
age. r various in
ed in extensulture and
ed the Min
Agriculture dically?
xplained thgents can f
nsion officerm that need
h, but who n
that the privtaking exte
nputs vary w
sion, but uslivestock
nistry of A
switched to
hat each faformulate ta
r to deliver resolving. Hotifies farm
vate sector ension to th
with agro-
ses Group extension
Agriculture
o demand
armer has ailor made
extension He further
mers.
has gone he farmers
3.3TechO. Mos
Slide 1
Slide 3
M
hnical presee
AG
M
MOI UNIV
entation on
Presen
GSHARE Project S
Moi University:
FOOD CROP
Role of Ma
in Maize V
JOSEPH A.
AGSHARE Project St
VERSITY A
n the role of
ntation at
Stakeholders W/S
February 28, 2
PS RESEARCH
ize Breeding
Value Chain
W. OCHIENG
takeholder WorkShop
AGSHARE
10
f maize bre
Shop
0111
p
2
S
S
PROJECT
eeding in th
Slide 2
Slide 4
T
he maize val
O
■ FO
■ NU
■ FIN
Value o
Food Crop
Maize
Beans
Cassava
lue chain B
Overarching Is
OOD SECURITY
UTRITIONAL SECU
NANCIAL SECURIT
of Food Crops (natio
Value (Billions of KShs
46.91
18.02
4.30
By Dr L.
ssues
URITY
TY
3
onally) in 2008
s)% Contributionto Total Value
44.15
16.96
4.05
4
n
Slide 5
Slide 7
Slide 9
M
SHOR
■ Ensure
■ Promot
■ Promot
■ Carry o
■ Do Bul
■ Revital
■ Kenya A
Revita
(Breed
Promo
Empow
• IncAgsusandExt
• Pu& Nall
MOI UNIV
INTERV
Political
Conducive
Technical
RT-TERM INITIATIVES TO MITI
e “Njaa Marufuku Kenya (NMK
te “Kilimo Bora” to ensure G
te Water Harvesting Techniqu
out Food Production through
k Fertilizer procurement;
lization of Agricultural Mecha
Agricultural Productivity and
alized Research: Genomics,
ding for HPR, VAD traits and a
otion of Valued-added Drylan
werment of Farmer (Common
Strategic In
creasing Budgetaryricultural Sector (hstain continuous ted transfer, in ordertension activities to
tting in place an alNutrition Policy to stakeholders in Fo
VERSITY A
VENTIONS
l Goodwill
GoK Policies
Strategizing
IGATE FOOD INSECURITY SI
K)” programme is successful
Good Agronomic Practices (G
ues for Crop Production.
h Irrigated Agriculture Project
anization Services.
Agribusiness Project (KAPA
Proteinomics, and Gene Targ
against undesirable intractab
d Maize Varieties for the ASA
n Interest Groups).
nterventions
y Allocation to the hence MoA & KARI)echnology developmr to improve Reseao the clients;
l‐inclusive Food Seensure full particip
ood Security activiti
oc
AGSHARE
11
5
6
ITUATION
l.
GAPs).
ts in ASALs
AP):-
geting:
ble traits);
ALs;
) to ment rch and
curity pation of ies;
7
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 6
Slide 8
Slide 10
T
Str
● Expansiohold more
● Investme
Rehabilita
1,000,000
Diver
●Making gcrop entesuch as Spotato, areduce th
● Pursuing Marketindiversity harvest s
Othe
● Embracing whereby prmarkets an
● Investing min rural aretransportatredistributiareas and tshortages.
rategic Interve
on of Strategic Graine Maize Grain stoc
nt in irrigation in A
ation of irrigation s
0 Hectares (Vision 2
rsification of F
reater efforts in diverprises (drought toSorghum, Millets, Cand NERICA (uplandhe pressure on mai
an open Regional ng Policy to tap on tin food types, suppseasons.
er Intervention
market oriented prroducts are targetend surplus food sold
more in infrastructuas (by GoK) in ordetion costs and enhaion of food from suthereby avoid geog
entions
n Reserve to ks;
ASALs:
chemes to
2030).
8
Foodstuffs
versification of olerant crops, Cassava, Sweet‐d Rice) in order to ize as a food crop;
Cross Border the Regional ply and varying
9
Strategies
roduction ed for niche d for incomes;
ural development er to reduce ance urplus to deficit graphical
10
Slide 11
Slide 13
Slide 15
M
1 SO
Land (T
Enviro
Water P
ASDS (
Food S
Promo
Promo
Implem
3
STRATEINTERV
RevitalizeService (A
Revitalize
Invigorate
Empower
5 INT
IN
NRM
Cons
Wate
BulkFerti
MOI UNIV
OME INTERVENTPL
STRATEGICINTERVENTION
Tenure) Policy
n. Conservatn.
Policy
(Policy doc)
Security and Nutritional Policy
ote Kilimo Plus
ote Kilimo Biashara
ment Irrigated Agriculture
INTERVENTION STR
EGICVENTION
e Agricultural Mechanization AMS)
ed Research under KARI
ed Agric, / Extension Service
r Farmers
TERVENTION STRATEG
STRATEGICNTERVENTION
M: Land & Water
servation Agric
er Harvesting
k Procurement of ilizers
VERSITY A
TION STRATEGILACE
TARGETINGPOLICY ISSUE
Ministry of Lands; All Kenyan
Ministry of Environment; All
Ministry of Water & Irrigation
ASCU (Ministry of Agricultur
ASCU (Ministry of Agricultur
NAAIAP: 121,000 farmers
NAAIAP: 100,000 farmers
ASAL Areas
RATEGIES (Summar
TARGETINGINSTITITIONAL ISSUE
23 AMS stations, 10 ATDCs:
(85 tractors, 10 bull-dozers)
Critical Research areas
NALEP: 1,200,000 farmers
KAPAP: Farmers in 20 districts
GIES (Summary) cont
TARGETINTECHNICAL ISS
Farmers in Fragile Environment
Farmers in Specific l
145 water pans
and 200 micro-dams
1,240 farmers under Fertilizer Grant Proje
AGSHARE
12
11
ES IN
GES
ns
Kenyans
n
re, etc.)
re, etc.)
ry)
12
ES
’d
13
NGSUES
ocation
2 KR ect
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 12
Slide 14
Slide 16
T
has co
MA
Goal of
Contributi
developing
associated
technolog
food and n
Objec
1. To develop
2. To develop options for
3. To develop
4. To develop
storage, pr
5. To contribut
varieties in
6. To foster te
and interna
In Kenya
FOOD Shorta
ome to be synony
AIZE Shortage ≡
f Maize Breedin
ion to KARI’s effo
g MAIZE varietie
d crop production
ies required to ad
nutritional securi
ctives of maize
p (breed) novel food
crop husbandry recr crop production;
crop protection me
p post‐harvest techn
rocessing and utiliza
te to the promotion
n order to catalyze
echnical linkages: n
ational for collabor
age
ymous with
HUNGER
14
ng Programme
ort in
s and the
n
ddress
ity
15
e breeding
d crop varieties;
commendation
ethods/options;
nologies:
ation;
n of new crop
adoption;
ational, regional
ative research.16
Slide 17
Slide 19
Slide 21
M
7 Plant B
► Screen
► Screen
► Seekinthoug
► Infusin
► Incorp
[ to en
►Availin
crop v
9 ►Dev
► Stab
►Devpest
►Dev
► Dev
►Dev
►Dev
quaand
1
Stat
Hig
Tota
Tota
From
Ave
On-
Gro
Pop
MOI UNIV
General Activit
Breeding (Variety D
ning new introduction
ning local landraces fo
ng maximum genetic pgh hybrid plant breedi
ng HPR into potential
porating pre‐harvest va
nhance probability of v
ng to farmers alternati
varieties for various ag
Specific Plant Br
velop high yielding f
bilize yields of food
velop resistance to tts (insects and non‐
velop tolerance to d
velop tolerance to a
velop select against
velop value added v
lities (high lysine, vbaking qualities (fo
NATIONAL M
tus
h per capita consumpti
al land area under maiz
al Production
m small-scale farmers
erage on-farm yields
-station yields
wth rate in production
pulation growth
VERSITY A
ties and Purpos
Development):
ns for adaptation;
or specialty traits;
potential of crop varieng (where applicable)
crop plants;
alue added traits: ……
variety adoption ] ;
ive choices of food
gro‐ecologies / uses.
reeding Activities
food crop varieties;
crop varieties;
the major diseases ‐arthropod);
drought and low N;
acid soils (Al toxicity
CNP (cassava);
varieties: nutritiona
vitamins, minerals), or wheat).
MAIZE STATISTI
Major staple
ion >125 kg
ze 1.5 Million he
2.3 Million to
70-80%
1.5 tons/ha
5-8 tons/ha
2.0%
>3.0%
AGSHARE
13
se
ties);
.
17
s:‐
and
y);
l
milling
18
ICS
e food
ectares
ons
19
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 18
Slide 20
Slide 22
T
K
N
Value C
Based o
KARI’s New Pe
MTP‐IV
(leading to
New Strategic
Chain Approach
on KARI’s New S
destal
o)
c Plan
20
to Research
21Strategic Plan
22
Slide 23
Slide 25
Slide 27
M
3 Cha
Altitude (me
Annual Rainf
Growing seas
Maize area (
Maize area (%
Potential Yie
Farmer Yield
Yield gap (T/
Adoption rat
5 C
.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Area (‘0
Prodn (
Res. Yie
Farmer
Yield G
7
Low So
Striga
MA
Nutrie
MOI UNIV
aracteristics of Maiz
Kenyan
Highlands Mid-Alt M
etres a.s.l.) >1800 1400-180
fall (mm) >1800 1000-180
son (days) 180 170
‘000 Ha) 307 461
%) 30 36
eld (T/Ha) 6.7 5.2
d (T/Ha) 2.0 0.7
/Ha) 4.7 4.5
tes (%) 80 50
Causes of Maize Yie
Coast M
Lo‐Int M
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
000 Ha) 22.2 217.7
(‘000 Tons) 53.0
eld (T/Ha) 3.3
r Yield (T/Ha) 1.0
Gap (T/Ha) 2.3
oil Fertility
Foliar D
a weed
AJOR CAUSES OF
Gray Leaf S
ent Deficit
VERSITY A
ze growing Zones in K
Moist Mid-alt
Mid-alt. Transition Dry
00 1400-1800 1200-1600 900-1800
00 800-1200 <800 400-
120 100 90
118 118 11
10 10 10
3.7 4.3 2.
1.1 1.2 0.
2.6 3.1 2.
45 35 26
eld Gap in various A
Mid‐Altitude Transitnl.
MA‐E MA‐Int Med‐Late
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
116.8 111.0 720.
238.0 232.0 1,234.0
2.7 3.7 5.2 6.7
0.5 1.1 0.7 2.0
2.2 2.6 4.5 4.7
Moist
Diseases Insect
MAIZE YIELD LO
Spot Disease
Dr
AGSHARE
14
Kenya
Coastal
Lowlands
- <900
-800 400-1400
0 120
8 33
0 4
.7 3.3
.5 1.0
.2 2.3
6 16
23
AEZs
Hi‐Alt
Late
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
0
910.0
7
0
7
24
25
ture stress
t Pests
OSSES
rought
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 24
Slide 26
Slide 28
T
With the fotake a strresearch
1. Basic Reseresearch
2. Strategicresearch
3. Applied Rneeds/de
4. Outreach
Food
B
ST
A
Technology D
‘push’
Research Pro
Seed System
Info. System( Feedback )
KARI’s Posit
orgoing scenario in rategic position in itagenda to delve m
earch for cutting‐ed(Universities and IA
Research to undermandate (local/oth
Research in order toemands (local partn
to answer to client
d Crops Program
BASIC RESEARCH (BI
TRATEGIC RES
ADAPTIVE RESEARC
Pivot to MPV
Delivery, Variety Pro
and Adoption
” heave-ho ”
▲
omotion/Adoption P
tion
mind, KARI has to ts scientific
more into:‐
dge scientific ARCs);
rpin its core her partners);
o meet client ners);
t demands.26
mme Set‐up
IOTECH)
EARCH
H (OFR)
27
VC ?
motion
28
‘pull’
Production Marketi
Processing
C o n s u m p t i o n
ng
n
Slide 29
Slide 31
Slide 33
M
9 Recent
Ma
KH600-14E
H614D (Co
Ha under G
KH500-43A
H513 (Com
Ha under M
GAF-4 (Str
H511 (Com
Ha for Strig
‘
1
Gu
3 M
MOI UNIV
tly Developed Maize Varieunde
aize Variety Yield (T/Ha)
E (GLS-resistant) 7.0
ommercial Check) 6.3
GLS maize
A (MSV-resistant) 5.5
mmercial Check) 4.3
MSV maize
riga-resistant) 3.4
mmercial Check) 2.4
ga maize -----
RESEARCH INSTRA
uided by Crop
In the Plan
Maize Density
VERSITY A
eties’ Performance againsr Stress
Disease / Pest Sco
GLS (0.5-5.0)
MSV(0.5-5.0)
1.97 -----
2.15 -----
20,000
----- 1.00
----- 3.50
120,000
----- -----
----- -----
----- -----
NTERVENTION ATEGIES
p Suitability M
ning Process
y Map of Kenya
AGSHARE
15
st Checks
ore
Striga (0.5-5.0)
-----
-----
-----
-----
2.50
4.50
20,00029
aps
30
31
a
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 30
Slide 32
Slide 34
T
Ma
Grain Basket(Acid Soils)
Western KenyaStriga weed& Poor Soils
1. Increasing g
2. Tapping that
2.1 Practicin
2.2 Protectin
2.3 Reducing
3. Promoting t
Crop Variety
4. Conducting (Milling, Bak
Qualities to e
aize Suitabilit
Kenya
R‐4‐D Aimsenetic potential of
t potential thru:‐
ng GAPs (Crop Man
ng the Field Crop fro
g Post‐harvest (Stor
he improved techn
y and Production op
Pre‐ and Post‐harveking, Nutritional, Ta
enhance marketabi
32
33
ty Map
Central Kenya
(MSV & GLS disease
Coastal Landraces
(Loose Sandy Soils)
s at:Crop Plants;
agement)
om Pests
rage) losses;
ologies:
ptions (GAPs);
est Value Additionste, ..)
ility.34
es)
s
)
n
Slide 35
Slide 37
Slide 39
M
5 Pro
1. Biotec
2. BreedD
3. GAPs►
►
4. Crop H
7 Maiz
9 Go
MOI UNIV
oductivity Enhance
ch: Functional GenomGene Targeting –
ding: Marker Assisted BDoubled Haploid Bree
Host‐Plant Resis(Crop Management) ►Conservation AgricultAdvising on Farming aHealth: IPM on Field C
Reduce StoraTackle Aflatox
The Epicentre of a Brthe Pollination / Sele
ze Breeding Progr
Hand Pollina
ood Agronomic
Practicing GAP is essent
Application of GAP requ
VERSITY A
ement & Value Add
mics, Proteinomics and– VAD & Intractable TrBreeding – reduce timding – reduce timestance (HPR) Breeding► e.g. Multiple Croppiture (Minimum Tillageas a BusinessCrops ‐ Diseases & Pesage Losses ‐ LGB, weevxin Problem (thru’ IPM
reeding Programme is ection (Maize) Nursery
ramme & Breeding
ation in Progress
c Practices (GA
tial to close the Yield gap;
ires Access to Capital.
AGSHARE
16
dition
d raitsme
g ing:e)
stsvilsM)
35
36
g Plans
37
APs)
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 36
Slide 38
Slide 40
T
HIGH M
From
For
On
PromResearchers co
Good A
Mrs. Walela -
MAIZE CROP PRO
the Grain Baske
National Food
n‐farm Demon
motion: ‘Seeing is onsult with Farmers at a fa
Agronomic Pra
- happy with performance
ODUCTIVITY
38et of Kenya
Security
nstration
39
Believing’arm in Western Kenya
actice (GAP)
40of her crop in Kimilili
Slide 41
Slide 42
Comme I
yb
A
M
1
► Br
► Us
► Di
for
2
ents on roleIt was notedyear while Kbreeding peA number o
Do you
Are you
Does KA
What do
What do
What is
MOI UNIV
Missin
roadening of Gen
sing Nano‐techno
iversification of P
Ecosystem, User
With these
KENYA CATIDE OF
If only theIMPLEM
e of maize bd that FAO eKenya consuer farmer retof questions
recommend
u comfortabl
ARI trade in
o you do to
oes KARI d
the position
VERSITY A
ng Links
netic Base
ology
Plant breeding ou
r System
e Strategies
AN STEM THE F HUNGER
ey were fullyMENTED
breeding inestimates thumption aveturns must awere raised
d phasing ou
le with tech
n products o
new varietie
do about qua
n of KARI o
AGSHARE
17
utputs
41
42
S
n the maize hat 108 kg oerage is 125also be consd on New se
ut of old see
hnology / inf
of research?
es legally?
ality of seed
on GMOs?
PROJECT
Slide 43
value chainof maize sho5kg. It was aidered.
eed varieties
ed variety?
formation fl
ds?
T
are Requ
n ould be consalso noted th
s adoption a
low from KA
PARTNERSH
uired in R-4-D
sumed per phat economi
as follows:
ARI to farm
HIPS
43
and Progres
person per ics of
mers?
ss
Respon H
mbpfcpr
4.3 Tech
lose
M
nses by Dr. MHe noted thmore depenbenefits of npromoted alfarm researcompanies products arregulates se
hnical Press? By Dr L
Imp
AG
Faan
Thse
MOI UNIV
Mose hat Sources nding on thnew varietielongside oldrch (R-E-F)(outreach a
re public geed quality in
sentation onL. O. Mose
pact of market land
Dr. Lawre
GSHARE WORKSHOP28th Feb-1s
Govt thru’ NCPB gu
armers stable prices andn organized outlet.
he pan-territorial, pan-easonal prices
VERSITY A
of maize che region. es. On varied ones. He s) and explaand partnergoods and n the countr
n impact of
iberalization: gad losers By
ence O. Mose
P, Moi University, Eldst March 2011
uaranteed
d
AGSHARE
18
consumptionHe reporte
etal adoptiostressed thatained that rship …….)
Kenya plary.
f maize libe
1
ainers
doret
5
PROJECT
n ratio figued that econn he suggest informatioKARI seed). He, in adant health
eralization i
T
ures vary bunomic figusted that newon gap can bd unit markddition, eminspectorate
in Kenya: W
Outline
Why maize ma Chronology of The study on “
Justification Objectives Methodolog Results & D
Beyond marke Challenges Opportuniti
Why M
Contribution to e Employment Food (consum Income Area under m
Maize-livestock in
Kenya: Net impo
Shortage of maiz
ut generallyures are avaw varieties be tackled thkets seed w
mphasized the service (
Who gains
e of Presentation
arket liberalizationf maize market liberaliza“impacts of maize markn
gyDiscussionet liberalization
ies
Maize?
economy
mption..98kg/person/year)
maize
nteractions
rter of maize.
ze = Famine in Kenya
y some eat ailable on should be hrough on with other hat KARI (KEPHIS)
who
2
ationket liberalization”
3
M
By lawere
The1988(CSR
The C Ru NC Pri
Until NCPB
Proan
Propri
Protim
Gomi
Lo
Goex
Lo
MOI UNIV
Chronology of maiz
ate 1980s the parastataa burden to the exche
process of liberalizingunder the Cereals
P)
CSRP falls into three areules governing maize tradingCPB cost reduction; cing policy.
Why marketing Boa
late 1980s agricultural B) were state controlled
otect maize producers from d provide reliable outlets for
otect consumers from unaccces
omote food security throughmes within the country.
Implications of Gov
overnment bail-outs of ismanagement (inefficie
ong delays in payments
overnment input subsidxchequer
ow farm productivity pe
VERSITY A
ze market liberalizat
als - ineffective, inefficequer
the market was initiaSector Reform Prog
eas:g and movement;
ards?
commodity markets (e mainly to:
unacceptably low or unstabr sale
ceptably high or unstable co
h assurance of maize availab
vernment guarantee
NCPB increased due to encies)
for deliveries made to
ies became a burden to
rsisted.
AGSHARE
19
8
tion
cient &
ated inramme
4
e.g.
ble prices,
onsumer
bility at all
6
es
gross
NCPB
o the
PROJECT
T
Need for (Obje
Increasedfarmers
Increased(as sellers
increasedmaize ma
Broad O
Broad Objec Assess t
traders &
Research qu maize m do priva do sma
incentive has m
commerin maize
Chron
Maize move1990s
In early 199 In 1996, the
Corporation commerciali
The prevailinpolicy excepstabilization as food reliegovernment
ectives) of maize ma
d specialization in m
d market participatiors of maize and buyed private participationarketing
Objective/Resear
ctivethe impact of liberalisa& farmers
uestionsmarket connected througate traders exploit farmell-scale farming housees?
market liberalisationrcialisation, crop diversie markets?
nology of mz mark
ment restrictions we
95 maize marketing we NCPB was exempteAct and its activitieszed. ng market trends dept when the board is
function or any othef distribution on beht.
7
arketing liberalizatio
maize production by
on by producers ers of inputs)on in input-output
rch Questions
ation policy measures o
gh price?ers?eholds respond to pric
affected householdfication and participatio
9
ket liberalization
ere lifted in early
was fully liberalizeded from the State s were
etermine NCPB pricins carrying out markeer social function suhalf of the
n
on
ce
ds’on
ng et uch
M
10 Yelinger We
Coshi
Follow(unkn
Prim
Prim
Sec
MOI UNIV
Statement of the P
ears after maize marketredere the objectives achieved?
ould there be express gainersift?
wing sections respond tnown impacts of market
Data Types & Sou
mary Data : Household MDB Household Survey of Follow-up Household Surv
mary Data : Traders’ S 169 maize & 122 fertilizer 119 seed traders Survey conducted -Dec 20
condary Data Monthly wholesale maize Fertilizer & maize World a
Study Area
VERSITY A
Problem
t liberalization questions
? If yes, to what extent? If N
s and losers to this market P
to some of these concet liberalization)
urces
ds’ Surveysf 161 households (1992)vey of 1992 households (200
Surveytraders
003 & June 2004
prices (1992-2004)nd domestic prices (1980-20
AGSHARE
20
10
s
No, why?
Policy
rns
03).
003)
12
PROJECT
T
SAMPL
Sampling pro
Randomly selectclimatic zonatisurvey1992)
Data collecti
Highlig
Maize wholesaby price but treareas.
Maize farmers
Both commercincreased with m
Analyti
Maize markets Cointegration
Do traders exp Structure-Co
Farmer respon Error correct
Impact on HHparticipation Double differ
LING PROCEDURE
ocedure: (Multistage)
cted HHs from stratified tions, population density
ion: Survey– 161 house
ghts of major findi
ale markets in major townd not known in marke
are responsive to price
cialization (as expected)market liberalization (un
ical approaches
s connected through pricon analysis
ploit farmers?onduct-Performance
nse to price incentivestion model
H commercialization, di
erencing & Descriptive statist
& DATA
d random sample based ty and farm size (MDB
eholds (1992 and 2004)
ings cont’d
wns are well connectedets located in remote
e incentives
) and crop diversificationexpected)
ce
iversification and marke
tics
on
)
n
et
M
Com N
Incrcons M
ra(t
Trad C N
Lose Go
Fa
Gain Pr Go
ins Fa
M Co
MOI UNIV
Highlights of majo
mmodity markets are paNCPB still actively involved in
reased number of tradestrained. Maize traders lack essentials ates for borrowed capital; latargeting and even what to
ders are competitive buCompared with farmers, tradNo evidence of traders explo
Preliminary effects
ersovernment Reduced share of mar
reduced tax from mz darmers No interlocked credit t No guaranteed price fo Farmers in remote are Farmers in remote are
deliveries to middleme High year to year price
difficult
Preliminary effects
nersrivate traders -- Increovernment-- No lostitutionsarmers
Increased input availabilityWider choice of seed varietIncreased product marketi
illers -- Cheaper maizeonsumers -- Cheaper m
VERSITY A
or findings
artially liberalizedn mz marketing
rs after market liberaliz
for trade (storage; face higack necessary market informstore)
t non-exploitativeders have better market infoiting farmers adduced from
: gainers & losers
rket revenue from NCPBdeliveries to NCPB
transactionsfor maize producedeas pay more for inputs eas receive less for maizence variabililty makes farm
: gainers & losers
eased commodity markeonger bailing out
y (shorter km to markets)etiesing outlets
e sourcesmaize
AGSHARE
21
zation but
h interest mation
rmationdata
20
B due to
s ize
m planning
19
et shareloss-making
PROJECT
T
Prelim
Increased partsector In input mark In output ma
Reduced Gove
Improved mar
Increased dive(consumers ladysfunctional
Effects
Increased inte
NCPB still Price Maize quali
and relaxed Long delays
inary effects of mark
ticipation of private
ketsrkets
ernment Revenues
rket integration
ersification acking confidence in food markets)
s: Two decades later
er-seasonal price variab
e Leaderity (stringent) standardsd during shortages.s persist for maize deliv
18
ket lib
Large trader
25
22
r cont’d
ility (bad for planning)
s maintained during glu
vered to NCPB
ut
ReactioProf. Oclear. Htraders indicateargued tahead topotentiawho delthe 1970Associasend kidof outpufarmers
Dr. Ochdifferenthe costthat devplayers.farmers
M
Poor amids
Nono
On-ofmark
Cob-w
W
Challe Big
cas
Hocasfor
Roto asy
Hocomma
ons on liberOdhiambo nHe requested
increased bed that eventhat could do note that al areas deselay payment0s compare
ation and cods to schoolut. It was aget higher o
huodho repntiation resut of productiveloped cou He furtherdepending
MOI UNIV
Effects: Two decad
output market integratst plenty in North Rift c
o clear incentives for private t panacea– Holistic approac
ff use of input subsidiesket lib)
web price behaviour (su
Way Forward: Challe
engesg Yield Gap? How do we impse in point)
ow do we improve maize mases of famine in parts of Kenr their produce?
ole of private sector still dismprivate sector often viewed ymmetries)?
ow do we encourage farmersmparative advantage in? Faarkets and each of them wa
ralization ofnoted that thd the presenbut compet
n though wedid be the ca
small scaleerve higher t and KARI
ed to the noould purchal on time sinalso noted toutput.
ported that ulting in incrion has gonuntries still r noted thaton conditio
VERSITY A
des later
ion (famine in Turkana case in point)
sector to invest in these arech needed)
s (contrary to expectati
urplus followed by short
enges & Opportuniti
prove land productivity (with
arket integration? – Avoid scnya with others without a cl
mal. How do we improve farmas exploiters (partly due to
s to engage in crops they harmers have no faith in dysfunts to grow their own food i
f grain subhe effects o
nter to explatition couldelfare was nase of cost be farmers arprices. He a
I /Seed comow. They usase new tracnce the costthat Trainin
liberalizatioreased effic
ne up mentiosubsidize
t liberalizatons put in pla
AGSHARE
22
21
and NEP-
eas (Mkt lib
ons of
tages)
23
ies
h maize as a
cenarios of ear market
mer attitudes information
ave unctional food i.e. maize
sector of maize libain the posid leave themnot capturedbeing highere poor butargued furth
mpanies. It wsed to acquictors. One ot of farmingng and Visi
on increaseiency and a
oning the catheir farmetion has alsace for liber
PROJECT
beralization ition of his m worse o
d, competitioer than returt efficient, bher that farm
was noted alsire cheaper of the farmeg is higher thit extension
ed more plaa decrease inase of chemiers and attriso affected ration of ma
T
Way Forcont’d
Opportunities
Vision 2030 Irrigation?
land to be Fertilizer P
efficiency? Value Add
etc etc)
High Domesti
Versatile priva
on traders study. He n
off without on among mrn from maibut wonderemers have toso that farmimports thrers reportedhan income
n approach
ayers in then consumer icals and feibuted it tothe efficien
aize.
rward: Challenges &
? Water harvesting and use e put under irrigationPrice Reduction thru’ (fertiliz?, fertilizer subsidies (Highedition (Diversification of ma
ic and Regional Demand for
ate sector emerged (comme
and millersnoted that sm
support. Hmillers is heize farming?ed if farmeo contend w
mers were berough Kenyd that farmes generated in those da
e market anprices. He rtilizers. He
o the capacncy of inpu
24
& Opportunities
of dams (vision 2030) –mor
zer plant?, fertilizer use r taxes!!!)ize products – oil, animal fe
r Maize
ercial banks, IT, transporters
s were not mall scale
He further ealthy. He ? He went rs in high
with NCPB etter off in a Farmers ers cannot from sale
ays helped
nd product noted that
e regretted ity of the
uts use by
re
eeds
s)
4.4 PresAgr
The minservices1. Mar2. War3. Qua4. Food5. Mec6. Fert7. Prom8. Post
He also allocatio
Reactio
One of tthat the applicat
Technic
M
sentation oriculture Ofnistry of Ags on the follorket informare house recality regulatid security ( chanization tilizer subsidmotion of agt harvest ma
noted that ton.
on to presen
the participagross marg
tion is faced
cal presenta
S
MOI UNIV
n the Role fficial, UAS
griculture ofowing: ation ceipt systemion of seed afood produ– calibratiodies gricultural canagement p
they face a n
ntation
ants questiogin calculatd by the prob
ation on th
Strengthening thHolder Farmers
VERSITY A
of MinistrySIN GISHUfficial report
m and other in
uction, SGR)n of planter
credit practices – c
number of c
oned the sustion was bablem of acid
e role of CG
he Capacity of Sms to Access Mark
Presentation made at AsEldoret “AGSHARE ProWorkshop” on 28th Febr2011
By: Nelson Sumba
AGSHARE
23
y of AgricuU ted that the m
nputs ) rs
cereal banks
challenges s
stainability osed on 25 bdic of soils.
GA in the m
mall kets
sis Hotel oject ruary
PROJECT
lture in ma
ministry’s r
s
uch as low
of subsidiesbags / acre.
maize value
T
aize market
roles include
staff numbe
s. The Minis It was also
e chain By N
5
Objec
EstabAssoc
Facilitcereal
Underimprovenviro
ting by Dist
e giving adv
ers and budg
stry official o noted that
Nelson Sum
ctives
lish and strengthen ciations (SHAs) in th
tate linkage to suppols enterprise develop
rtake advocacy activve enabling policy a
onment in the cereal
trict
visory
getary
explained t fertilizer
mba
Smallholder e project area;
ort services for pment; and,
vity in order and regulatory s sub-sector.
Slide 3
Slide 4
M
2
W
3
Ge
CGco
8
A
MOI UNIV
Who is CGA?
National member base
Incorporated in the yea
Membership is over 20large, medium & small-
CGA, however reachesindirectly, > 95% being
Associate membershipmachinery, Financial in
CGA intervenes in the
eographical Foc
1. Nakuru
2. Narok
3. Bomet
4. Kisii
5. Nandi
6. Uasin Gishu
GA operates in over 10 ounties in Kenya includi
Greater integration of Scereals value chain
Reduced post-harvest
Reduced transaction c
Increased smallholder facilities
Increased smallholder accurate market inform
Improved trade linkageprocessors and food a
Anticipated Imp
VERSITY A
d, cereal farmers’ organ
ar 2000
,000 farming household-scale farmers
s over 500,000 farmers small scale
p (48) i.e. seed, agro-chnstitutions & insurance f
entire grain value chain
us
7. Trans Nzoia
8. Bungoma
9. Kakamega
10. Mount Keny(Meru & La
major cereal producingng:
Smallholder farmers int
losses
costs
farmers access to cred
farmers access to timemation
e between SHA and traaid agencies e.g. WFP P
pact
AGSHARE
24
nization
ds – for
emical, firms
n
a
ya region ikipia)
g
to the
dit
ely and
ders, P4P
PROJECT
T
4
CGA’s A
6
Mobilize Associati
Conduct Assessm
Conduct
Facilitatemillers &
Dialogueinstitutionbodies th
Major A
7
Major e
At leasttotal of 9
NumberWFP P4
90,720 transact
96 SHAHandlin
Areas of Cove
Farmers into groups (Sions or SHAs)
Capacity building of SHment findings
post-harvest handling t
e linkage between buyeWFP’s – P4Pand input
e with government minisns, bureaus of standardhat impact on cereals tra
Activities
expected outp
t 36 New SHAs form96 SHAs over three
r of smallholder prod4P and other organiz
MT of cereals are coted jointly
As are trained on Posng
rage …Map
Smallholder
HAs based on Needs
training
rs and sellers, includingt suppliers
stries, regulatory ds, and other national ade
uts
med; working with a years
ducers linked to zed markets
onsolidated and
st Harvest
g
Reactio
One of Valley. Valley bworld fo
M
12
10
Tr
ons to the p
the participThe Cerea
being the good program
MOI UNIV
Quotes:
“Manna no lon
……………………A
Go
raining … samp
resentation
pants questial growers’ rain basket.
mme.
VERSITY A
nger falls from Heaearn it”
– Pulling together helps -
………………………Asante sana!
od bless you!
ple certificate
n
ioned why massociation
. He also n
AGSHARE
25
aven we
………
majority of n official exnoted that th
PROJECT
f the Cereal xplained thhis could be
T
9
Challen
Unwillingroup
In most FOs rem
Poor / inthe intepractice
Uncoorddifferen
11
Participatraining, A
Growers sihat this is ae connected
nges
ngness of farmers to
project areas, youthmain a challengenadequate road netwrior areas where far
eddinated services to tt stakeholders in the
nts at a post harveAsis Hotel Eldoret
ites are basattributed tod to operatio
o work freely in a
h involvement in
work particularly in rming is greatly
the farmers by e sector
est handling (Dec 2009)
sed in Rift o the Rift ons of the
Technic
Slide 1
Slide 2
M
cal presenta
OuTr
• Pro
• Pro
• Lob
• ProCo
• Butrai
MOI UNIV
ation on th
Mission
ur mission is to prrading in the grain
EASTERN ACOU
ABOU
1st MARB
Irene
EAGC Oomote regional grain
ovide market informa
bby for harmonized
omote structured trammodity Exchange
ild Capacity ofinings
VERSITY A
e role of EA
Statement
romote Structuredn industry.
AFRICA GRAIUNCIL
T EAGC
RCH 2011BYe Tarus
Objectivesn trade
ation
trade policies & stan
ading systems e.g.
grain stakeholders
AGSHARE
26
AGC in the
d
IN
ndards
WRS and
s through
S
S
PROJECT
e maize valu
Slide 3
Slide 4
T
ue chain By
• The Easis a – non pr
– memb
– registe
• EAGC iUSAID
• Eligible– All sta
• Prod
• Servcom
• Farm
• Current M
• Active M– Comp
the coproces
• Affiliate– Nation
sectorsproces
• Associa– This is
industrorganizand ou
y Irene Tar
EAGC
stern Africa Grain
rofit
ber-based organizati
ered in Kenya in Dec
s currently suppoprograms and FS
EAGC M
e Membershipakeholders along theducers, Processors, Tra
vice Providers (Warehompanies and input supp
mer and Trader associa
Members are from UG,
MembershipMemberspanies or representativeore sectors; grain produssors.
e Membersnal associations that reps at the national level (pssors associations).
ate Memberss a broad member baseries, service providers, zations and individuals
utside the Council area
rus
C
n Council (EAGC)
ion
c 2006
orted by SIDA, SD
Membership
e grain value chainaders
ouse Keepers, inspectiopliers, Banks, Insurance
ations
KE, TZ and Rwanda
p Categories
e organizations from ucers, traders and
present the core producers, traders and
e which includes allied international who operate within of operation.
on e)
M
• C
• PNK
• T
• C
o
oo
o
• Quic
• PromSyste
• PromExch
• CollaCOM
MOI UNIV
Market Inform(www.
Crops update (KE
Prices (maize, riceNairobi, Eldoret, KKampala, Dar es
Trade projections
Cross border trad
EAGC
o Provide timely andmarket information
o Linking buyers to so Provide training on
arbitration, Wareh(WRS)
o Liaise with governauthorities on grai
EAGC SERVck dispute settleme
mote and coordinaem
motion of the devehanges e.g. in Tan
aborate with regioMESA, EAC)
VERSITY A
mation Serviceratin.net)
E,UG,TZ,RW)
e, beans & pulsesKisumu, MombasaSalaam, Kigali,
e flow
C SERVICE
d accurate regional gnsellersn trade contracts, stouse Receipt Syste
ments and regulaton trade policies
VICES cont…ent through arbitra
ate Warehouse Re
elopment of Commnzania
nal trading blocks
AGSHARE
27
es
s): a,
S
grain
andards, m
ry
…ation
eceipt
modity
s(
PROJECT
T
• Harmonstandarregion.
• Harmonrationalregionapolicies(import/bans, dlevies)
Cros• EAGC c
data on:-Volume flo
across th- Prices at
points- Source a
of comme.g. UgaKenya
Struct
• Organiz• Aggrega
• Providin
• Develop
• Use and
• Establis
• PromoteKenya.
Policy
nized maize rds in the
nization and ization of l trade /export uties,
ss border moollects :owing he bordert border
and direction modity flow
nda to
tured Trading activities
zing farmers ating volumes
ng market informa
p standard contra
d honoring contra
sh arbitration mec
e Warehouse Re
onitoring
System
ation
cts and rules
acts
chanism
eceipt System in
M
•
•
•
MOI UNIV
www.e
CoEAGC s
Tel: +254-grains@
Tra
Awareness creationon use of trade contracts.
Use of Warehouse Receipts.
Training on Trade finance tools available e.g. Tradecontract which are different from forward contracts.
VERSITY A
eagc.org
ontact:secretariat-20-3745840
@eagc.org
aining
n
e
AGSHARE
28
PROJECT
T
Co• Cereal Gro
Associatio
• Kenya NatFederationProducers
• Cereal MilAssociatio
• Ministry of
ollaborating owers
on(CGA)
tional n of s(KENFAP)
llers on(CMA)
f Agriculture
• S
• U
• FD
• A
• U
Thank Yo
institutions
SIDA
USAID-COMPETE
Financial Sector Deepening(FSD)
ACDI-VOCA
USAID-CNFA
ou
E
4.5 Tech
M
hnical pres
K
Obje
Outp1. I2. R3. I
Activhap
• USimp
• Stahouand
• Wo• Go
20Su
• Camilpeavarmayam
• ACInteAss
• USfirmin 4
• Its oppin a
• Its sysand
MOI UNIV
sentation on
KMDP’s role inCh
ective 1: INCREASE
putsncreased production
Reduced cost of proncreased adoption o
vities: Demo plots (harvesting, quality stadoption of new techproduction and gross
What isSAID funded Kenya Maiplemented by ACDI/VOarted in 2002 to run for usehold incomes througd by applying the value ound up in March 2009ot a 15 months extensio12 and preparations forpport of Food Security A
assava, sweet potatoes,let, green grams, dolichas, pearl millet, beans, rieties (OPVs) of maize aturing. Others that can ms, arrow roots, irish po
What is AC
CDI/VOVA – Agriculturaernational/ Volunteers isistance
S based international nom started in 1962, curre45 countriesmission is to promote bportunities, growth and agricultural value chains4 core areas of interest
stems 2) enterprise devd 4) community develop
VERSITY A
n the role o
the Maize VahainED PRODUCTIVITY
n per unit areaductionof new technologies
(input use, agronomytandards) , field dayhnologies, cost of s margin analysis
s KMDP?ze Development Progra
OCA7 years mainly to boostgh taking farming as a b chain approach
on from January 2011 tor a 5-year program calleActivities (SFSA), cowpeas, sorghum, finhos lablab, pigeon peaskatumani or open pollin e.g. katumani that are be included are banan
otatoes.
CDI/VOCA?
l Cooperative Developmn Overseas Cooperativ
on-profit business consuently managing over 90
broad-based economic development for coopes around the worldt: 1) food and agricultur
velopment 3) financial spment
AGSHARE
29
of KMDP in
alue
Y
y, post ys,
am
t business
o June ed
nger s, chick nated early as,
ment ve
ulting projects
eratives
ral systems
PROJECT
n the maize
THE M
• The dethe late
• A baseconstrmaize sector
KMD
ObjectivePROD
Outputs1. Produce2. Produce
manage3. Apex or
Activities:developfacilitatestrategymobilizatool ( godevelopand exte
T
value chai
ROLE OF KMMAIZE VALUE
Presented by Jaat
Assis Hotel, 1st M
Why KM
eclining performane 90’s
eline survey condaints experiencedfarmers leading tto provide tailor-m
DP’s role in theChain Co
e 4: INCREASED EFFDUCER ORGANIZATIO
er organizations establisheder organizations have accesement skillsrganizations strengthened
Train producer organizationpment, link producer organize quarterly EXCEL (Experieny) peer information sharing fation schemes, develop an oovernance, operations and mpment, financial managemenernal relations)
n By Jane T
MDP IN THEE CHAIN
ane Tum
March 2011
DP?
nce of agriculture
ucted indicated d by smallholder to private/ public made solutions
e Maize Value ont’dFECTIVENESS OF ONS
d and strengthenedss to improved business and
ns on leadership and group zations with value chain actonce CEntred Leadership forums, develop savings organizational development management, human resournt, business services deliver
Tum
E
in
d
ors,
rce ry
M
K
Obje
Out1. I2. M
Actiss
K
Obje
Outp1. Im2. B3. A
Activdsfabfesc
• ERthesinrisi
• SR
• V2indqua
• NA
• NA
• MD
MOI UNIV
KMDP’s role inChain
ective 2: INCREA
putsmproved village bas
Market linkages deve
ivities: post harvesstandards, Identify sstorage/ bulking
KMDP’s role inChain
ective 3: INCREASE
utsmproved financial access byBDS providers strengthenedAccess to VBAAs increased
vities: Assist ATC with cdevelopment, engage Vsatisfaction from their inarmers/ agro-dealers, s
build their capacity on eertilizer use on selected
stockists on technical adcommodity/ crop value a
Need for enhRS: for wealth and empe country’s economy bace 2002 when GDP greng gradually to 6.1% in
RA: -2004
2030: -2006: aims to trdustrialized middle incomality life to all its citizens
AEP:- 2006…
ARS:-2006…
DGs:- GDP to 10% an
VERSITY A
the Maize Van Cont’dASED TRADE
sed storage facilitieseloped and strength
sting, grades and quites for cereal satell
the Maize Van Cont’dED ACCESS TO BD
y BDS providers
curricula and institutionVBAAs and report on farnput, facilitate credit accselect rural agro-dealersembedded advisory servd crops, train and certifydvice and support, faciladdition
hancing P-P-ployment creation whicack on path to rapid growew from a low of 0.6% an 2006.
ansfer Kenya into a newme country providing a s
nually
AGSHARE
30
alue
shened
uality ite
alue
DS
al rmers cess by s and vices on y itate
-Ph saw wth and
wly high
PROJECT
Outsta
• Training• Group, • Group g• Leverag
intellige• Staff an• Beyond
greenhoposho mploughs
Ou
• Farmingsignatu
• Annual (interfacommu
• Maize H• Promot
inputs itheir ac
• Trainingpost ha
Im
ACDI/VO
1. Cere
2. Farm
3. Keny(KAC
4. Easte
T
anding achiev
g curricula developmmobilization develo
grantsge in terms of gettinence information e.gnd VBAAs mentorshd maize – horticulturouses), dairy (animamillers developments etc
tstanding ach
g as a business – Aure
business fairs –Eldce between farmers
unity)Handbook (Edtn 1 ation of new technolon appropriate quant
ccess and usegs- FaaB, Safe use
arvest handling
mplementation
OCA in strategic p
eal growers Assoc
m Input Promotions
ya Agricultural CoCE)
ern Africa Grain C
vements Cont’d
ment with ATCpment
g timely market g. Kencallhip and developmentre (mushrooms, al feed formulation),t), saccos, chisel
hievements
ACDI/VOCA’s
oret and Nakuru s and business
nd 2)ogies and packagingtities thus enhancing
of agro-chemicals,
n of KMDP
partnership with:
ciation (CGA)
s Africa (FIPS)
mmodity Exchang
Council (EAGC)
d
t
of g
ge
Reactio Mr. Chprogramparticipaservicesinitiativ It was initiativ
1. L2. I3. E4. I
4.6 AgS
Slide 1
M
ons on the r
heserek, a mme had doants questios from the ve does not c
noted that ves for exam
Low producImmediate cExtra expenInadequate
Share Dairy
FINAG
M(ST
MOI UNIV
role of Keny
Kenya Daione good joned why faKenya Mai
cover also li
farmers hample storage
ction – whatcash flow nenses at NCBfunding to i
y Stakehold
NDINGS OF MGSHARE PILO
DAIRY VA
BMR. FRANCIS OSTUDENT, M.PH
RESOUR1/3/2
VERSITY A
ya Maize D
iry Board ob to enco
farmers wereize Developivestock.
ave a myriaof maize. S
t is there to eeds - Dela
BP invest
ders survey
MOI UNIVERSOT PROJECT
ALUE CHAIN
BYONYANGO ODUHIL.AGRIC ECORCE MGT)/2011
AGSHARE
31
Developmen
official noourage puble not movinpment initia
ad of reasoSuch reasons
store? ayed paymen
y report By
SITY T ON
UORON &
S
PROJECT
nt Program
oted that thlic private ng ahead toatives. Ano
ons why thes include:
nt from NC
Francis Od
Slide 2
T
mme
he Kenya sector partn
o take advanther stakeh
ey do not a
PB
duor
I• KenyaestimatcontribGDP
• In AfricAfrica,domest
• SudanCOMESsatisfy
Maize Devnerships. Ontage of theolder asked
adopt some
NTRODUCThas the largest dated 4 million milkibutes 14% of Agr G
ca, Kenya is the onlythat produces en
tic consumption and
is the largest prodSA, but it does notboth domestic and e
velopment One of the e advisory d why the
e of these
TIONiry herd in SSA, wng cows (KDB). DaDP and 3.5% of to
y country, after Sounough milk for bod export
ducer of milk in tt produce enoughexport markets
ithairyotal
uthoth
theto
Slide 3
Slide 4
Slide 5
M
LARGEST PRODUCE
LARGEST
LARGEST
FAO statistics
COU
SUDA
KENY
EGYP
SOU
MORFAO stat
• TOREPR
• IDPO
MOI UNIV
COUN
MILK ER
INDIA
EXPORTER NEW
IMPORTER MEXIC
s 2009
WORLD STA
AFRICUNTRY
AN
YA
PT
TH AFRICA
ROCCOtistics
OBJE
O COMPARE AND COECOMMENDED PRARACTICES
ENTIFY POSSIBLE COSSIBLE REMEDY
VERSITY A
NTRY VOLUME
A 108 MILLIO
ZEALAND 15 MILLION(95%)
CO 105,000 M
ATISTIC 2009
CA 2009VOLUME
5.32b Litres
4.07 b Litres
3.2 b Litres
3.09 b Litres
1.7b Litres
CTIVES
ONTRAST ACTICES AND CURRE
ONSTRAINTS AND
AGSHARE
32
ON TONS
N TONS
MT
ENT
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 6
Slide 7
Slide 8
T
D
• Data was gNovember
• The targetKenya.
• Systematic‐ 47 farme‐10 consum‐3 transpo‐2 process
‐3 key inform
‐12 trader
In MachakElgeyo/M
Nakuru an
• The methdescribe tcomparat
DATA
RESUFARMERS – SOC
PARAMETERS P
GENDER 8F
OCCUPATION 7FAFA
EDUCATION 5SP
DATA AND MET
generated through sur 2010. t population was all d
c random sampling wers, mers, orters, ors,
mants
rs
kos, Trans Nzoia, Uaarakwet, Baringo,
nd Bungoma
od employed was dthe data and gross ive purposes.
TA AND METHO
ULTS AND DISCIO‐ECONOMICS
PERCENTAGES R
5% MALE ; 15% EMALE
Moho
0% FARMERS; 30% ARMING AND OFF‐ARM
5% TERTIARY; 40% ECONDARY; 5% RIMARY
58n
THODS
urvey carried out in
dairy stakeholders in
was used to select;
asin Gishu, Nandi ,
descriptive to margin analysis for
ODS Cont
CUSSION
REMARKS
Male dominated, owners of assets and household heads. Focon male
55% of Tertiary and 87.5% of secondary hano formal employmen
n
us
adnt;
Slide 9
Slide 10
Slide 11
M
FARMERS
PARAMET
OTHERSOURCES INCOME
COOPERA
FAMILY SI
FARM SIZ
RE
0 RE
1 • AVER•AVERA
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
L/COW/D
AY
MOI UNIV
S – SOCIO‐ECONOMICS
TERS PERCENTAGES
OF 50% DEPENDED ONTRANSFERS FROM FRIENDS AND RELA10% PETTY TRADE NONE
ATIVE 65% NOT MEMBER35% MEMBERS
ZE MEAN OF 6 PERSO
E MEAN OF 5 ACRES
ESULTS AND D
ESULTS AND D
MILK PRORAGE NUMBER OF COWS AGE MILK YIELD /COW/D
PERFORMANCE OF
Minimum
VERSITY A
REMARKS
N
ATIVES, & 10
A sign that dairy fneeds supplemenof income. NEED FACILITIES INLINEDAIRY FARMING
RS; Recipe for informmarket and a cauprices being expe
ONS
DISCUSSION Co
DISCUSSION Co
ODUCTION= 4 (MIN 2 ; MAX 12 )
DAY = 13.75L (MIN 5; MAX
F DAIRY COW PER COUNTY
Maximum AVERAGE
AGSHARE
33
farming ntary sources FOR CREDIT E WITH
mal milk use of poor erienced
ont
ont
X 31)
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 12
Slide 13
Slide 14
T
MILK M
Market 80%
Formal 28%
VARIABL
GRO
MARKETING CTotal
production 13.75L
%
Domestic 8%Non‐formal
52%
LE COSTS/L/C
SS MARGIN/C
CHANNELS
Non‐Market 20%
Spoil 0.15%Calve 11.85%
OW/DAY
COW/DAY
Slide 15
Slide 16
Slide 17
M
5 V
6 CH
• Na
• Ina
• Hig
• Low
• Pes
• Poo
• Exp
• Lat
• Poo
• Ina
7
MOI UNIV
VARIABLE COST
ALLENGES FACI
tural calamities e.g
adequate credit faci
gh cost of feeds
w milk and milk pro
st and diseases
or infrastructure
ploitation by middle
te payment by buye
or breeds
adequate extension
VERSITY A
T COMPARISIO
NG DAIRY FARM
g. drought
ilities
oduct prices
emen
ers
n services
AGSHARE
34
ON
MERS
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 18
Slide 19
Slide 20
T
R
• Strategic
‐ to stabilizedry seaso
‐ Invest in p
• Absorb e
‐ Expand to
‐ Investme
• Implemenguide andpreservat
TR
• ECONO• RETURN TCONTAINEREVENUE PRICE
• CHALLE• ILLIGALITYBARRIER TINDUSTRY
ECOMMENDA
milk reserve
e milk production son
processing of long li
excess production
nontraditional ma
nt in infrastructure
nt national livestocd promote on farm tion
TRANSPORTE
RANSPORTER
OMICSTRIP HAS EMPTY ALERS HENCE NO ADD – BUY LOW PRICE
ENGESY OF INFORMAL MATO ENTRY INTO TRAY
ATIONS
shortfalls in the
ife dairy products
arkets
e
ck feed policy‐ to feed
ERS
S Cont
LUMINUM DITIONAL & SELL HIGH
ARKET IS A ANSPORT
Slide 21
Slide 22
Slide 23
M
1
REVEN
SALES OTOTAL R
COSTSTRANS
ADMIN
CESS ‐K
CHILLIN
PAYMETOTAL C
2
• CH• MQU
• UN
• HI
• RE• BA
3
• ARNE
• DI
• CH• UN
• MFA
• M
MOI UNIV
CHILLING / CHEPKORI
GROSS MARGIN A
Q
NUE
OF MILK (New KCC Ltd)REVENUE
SSPORT
NISTRATION
KDB
NG COST
ENT TO FARMERSCOST
CHILLING / B
HALLENGESILK DELIVERY AFTERUALITY
NTIMELY MILK COLL
GHER OPERATION C
EMEDYACKWARD OR FORW
PROC
RE MANY WITH THEEW KCC LTD, SPIN K
FFERENT QUALITY S
HALLENGESNDERCAPICITY UTIL
INIMUM STANDARDARMERS )
ILK PURCHASE IN V
VERSITY A
BULKINGO DAIRY LTD
ANALYSIS PER LITRE
QTY UNIT PRICE
1 32.5
1 2.5
1 2.8
1 0.2
1 1
BULKING Cont
R 2 HRS IMPACTING
LECTION BY PROCES
COSTS
WARD INTEGRATION
ESSORS
E MAJOR ONES BEINKNIT AND BROOKES
STANDARDS
LIZATION (56.25%)
D REQUIREMENT (8
VOLUMES NOT QUA
AGSHARE
35
TOTAL
32.532.5
2.5
8 2.8
0.2
1
2632.5
t
G ON
SSORS
N
NG IDE
80% OF
ALITY
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 24
Slide 25
Slide 26
T
• IRREGULAR
• TAXATION
• INFORMAL
• LESS FLEXI
• COPING• IMPORTATFRESH MIL
• REMEDY• INCREASED
• ENFORCEM
DIS
• ARE MAN
• BASED IN
• CHALLE• STORAGE
• INFORMA
RE
• ARE MAN
• HAWKERS
• COMPROM
• LOW CRED
• MOTIVATE
• RETAILERS
PROCESSORS R SUPPLY DUE TO W
L MARKET
BILITY IN PRICE
G MECHANISMION OF MILK POWDLK
YD PRODUCTIVITY
MENT OF LAW
STRIBUTORS/A
Y IN THE COUNTRY
URBAN CENTRES
ENGEFACILITIES
AL MARKET
ETAILERS /HAW
Y IN THE COUNTRY
S
MISE QUALITY
DIT ACCESS
ED BY CASH‐FLOW
S
ContWEATHER PATTERNS
DER TO MAKE
AGENTS
Y
WKERS
Y
S
Slide 27
Slide 28
Slide 29
M
7 RET
8 • 10
• W
• Im
• Ra
• Bequ
• IM
• redmi
9
• CH
• STA
• PR
• PO
• NO
MOI UNIV
RETAILERS /H
TAILERS
CONS00% CONSUMED FR
HY INFORMAL MAR
mmediate consumpt
aw milk perceived a
elieve that boiled muality requirements
MPACT
ducing the WTP a pilk
CONSUM
HALLENGES
TANDADIZATION (Un
RICE FLACTUATION
OOR HYGIENIC MILK
ON‐OBSERVANCE O
VERSITY A
HAWKERS Con
SUMERSRESH MILK
RKET?
tion in small quanti
as creamer and rich
milk is safe (70% awa)
premium for pasteu
MERS Cont
nit Measure)
K HANDLING COND
OF CLINICAL REGULA
AGSHARE
36
nt
ties
er
are of
urized
ITIONS
ATIONS
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 30
Slide 31
Slide 32
T
K
• Fine Ksh
• Ksh 0.20 (Only for
• Ksh 0.20
SIZE OF TRA
Mini‐dairies
Mini dairy (5
Large Proces
KENYA DA
KEYKENYA
Steps Activit1 Registratio
2 Assessmen
of the
processing
exercise
3 Collection
the sample
4 Recommen
tion &
certificatio
5 Issue of 1
year permi
KEY INSTITUTI
3,000
/ L levy is chargedr the 35% farmers)
/ L levy is charged
ADER
(less than 5,000L per
5,000 to 100,000L Per
ssor (100,000L per day
AIRY BOARD
Y INSTITUTIONBUREAU OF Sty Processor Fees on Small firms 5,800
Big firms 20,000
nt
g
of
e
nda
on
it
FARMER
TRA
PROCESS
DISTRIBUTOR
RETAILER / HAW
CONSUMER
VALUE CHA
ONS
to the farmers
to processors.
LICENSE COS
(Ksh)
r day) 3,100
r day) 6,000
y) 25,000
NS ContSTANDARDS(Ksh) Remarks
Ksh 7,500 is charged
for every product
ANSPORTER
CHILLING/BULKING
SOR
TRANSPORTER
RS
WKERS
AIN
ST
d
REACT
A numbdairy va
23
From fawhile cocosts Kexpressereported Dr. Moswas notthrough On the o16 wasproductiunder-e Addition
1. S2. W3. S
m
It emergexposin
Mr. Rutnumber feeding inferior farmers differen
M
TIONS TO
ber of questalue chain su
1. Is non-f2. How did3. Is explo
armers respoows require
Kshs. 50 / coed their pred to be comm
se asked wht illegal as
h adulteration
other hand M far belowion cost dustimated.
nal questionShould we bWas the preShould we milk?
ged that infng consumer
to, a Ministrof challengand labor. cows ownewere now
ntaite the cos
MOI UNIV
THE PRE
tions were urvey. Some
formal markd you compu
oitation by m
onses it was1 ½ bales o
ow / day, sference for mon. In add
hether it wahad been sn and reiter
Mr. Cheserw what is oue to leasin
ns raised by be aiming atesenter encohave cooler
formal markrs to unsafe
ry of Livestges which c
He recomed by farm
w worse offst of produc
VERSITY A
ESENTATIO
raised by se of the que
ket illegal? ute forage?
middlemen a
s noted thatof silage persale of heifthe informa
dition, the av
as possible ttated. The q
rated that the
ek, a dairy bobserved ing/renting o
stakeholdert 18L/cow/d
ouraging hawrs for small
ket was popuand adulter
tock Develocomprised smmended a mers. In add
f than befoction for hig
AGSHARE
37
ON
stakeholdersestions inclu
a challenge?
t some farmr day at Kshfers contribual market duverage cow
to train hawquality of me cost of pro
board officin the field.f land. Add
rs included:day? wking? Whilholder farm
ular with farated milk.
opment officmall non-vigene pool
dition, he noore. It was gh potential
PROJECT
s on the preuded:
?
mers incur a h 170 / bale.ute to farmue to high mproduces 20
wkers. It wamilk had beoduction do
ial, noted thHe attribu
ditionally, l
:
ich is bettermers? Mainl
armers and
cial, reporteiable farm sof high yieoted that Aalso recom
areas and lo
T
esentation o
cost of pro. It was rep
m profit. Mamargins. Pri0L of milk p
as noted thateen undermes not drop
hat the cost uted this tolabor cost c
r; hawking oly for Sund
consumers
d that the dsizes, high ielding breed
A.I. services mmended thow potential
of the findin
duction of Korted that w
ajority of thice variationper day.
t the informmined during
below Ksh
of productio underestimcould also h
or processinday milk an
despite the
dairy subsectinput costs ding stock t
were expehat the studl areas.
ngs of the
Ksh 23/ L while labor he farmers n was also
mal market g hawking 20.
on of Ksh mation of have been
g? nd evening
danger of
tor had a especially to replace
ensive and dy should
4.0 PresDist
The Disthat ther42 milliHe indicthat the
234
Reactio
When areportedinseminhas esca
4.1 Pres
Slide 1
M
sentation otrict Livesto
strict Livestore were abouion litres of cated that thdairy subse1. High co2. Pests an3. Inadequ4. Poor roa
ons to the p
asked about d that the nation servicalated as mi
sentation o
MOI UNIV
n the Role ock Produc
ock Productut 98,918 familk per ye
he Ministry ector was facost of feeds nd diseases uate capital fad network
resentation
the status osubsector
ces have beclk prices de
n the Role
KENYA DA
CORPORAKenya Dair
established by in 1958. The a
are governeIndustry Act Ca
of K
VERSITY A
of Ministryction Offici
tion Officialarmers in thear in the forwas reachincing a numb
for purchase
n
of the dairy swas not dcome expeneclined.
of the Keny
AIRY BOARD
ATE HISTORYry Board was act of parliamen
activities of KDBed by the dairy ap 336 of the lawKenya.
AGSHARE
38
y of Livestoial, Uasin G
l reported thhe district. Hrmal marketng out to farber of challe
e of quality
subsector indoing wellnsive, milk m
ya Dairy B
nt
ws
S
PROJECT
ock DevelopGishu
hat the staffHe further ret and 2 millirmers througenges namel
breeding sto
n Uasin Gishcompared
marketing is
oard in mil
Slide 2
T
pment in m
f: farmer ratieported that ion litres in gh field dayly;
ock
hu diastrict,to the 190
s constrained
lk marketin
• KDB is mapromote t
• VISION
• To be a wregulatory
milk market
io was 1: 13the district the informa
ys. He also r
, the livestoc070s since d and produ
ng-By Mr C
MANDATE
andated to regulatethe Dairy Industry i
orld class dairy devy authority
ting By
3795 and marketed al market. reported
ck official Artificial
uction cost
Cheserek
E
e, develop and in Kenya.
velopmental and
Slide 3
Slide 4
Slide 5
M
• Wequexpropro
B
• M
• Ththe
• It bepo
• Att
• Da
• Ov
• 30
• Estlitr
• Fa
MOI UNIV
THE M
e are committd to ouality professional spectations of out stompt service and aompt dairy informa
BACKGROUND
ilk production per y
he dairy sub sect coe fastest growing se
is the most reliableeing used by many poverty
tractive to poverty
NORTH R
airy cattle 1.2 millio
ver 100,000 dairy fa
0 strong farmer orga
timated milk produres/year
rmers Coolers – 15
VERSITY A
MISSION
offering the highestservice which meetstakeholders by givinavailing accurate anation as required.
D INFORMATIO
year = 4.1 billion lit
ntributes 8% of GDector‐4%.
e income earner thapartners to reduce
reduction program
IFT REGION
on population
armers
anizations
uction = 360 million
AGSHARE
39
t s the ng d
ON
res
DP. It is
at is
mmes
n
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 6
Slide 7
Slide 8
T
MILK
• Processor
• Mini Dairi
• Milk Bars
• Small trad
• Western &
• Farmers c
• Home con
I
• The liberacreated alot of conbeing sold
• Regulatio
• Promotio
• Developm
K MARKETING
rs – 4 ‐ KCC, BroLessos, M
ies ‐ 12
‐ 150
ders ‐ 1000
& Nyanza Markets‐
coolers ‐ 15
nsumption ‐ Evening
‐ Unsold
INFORMAL SE
alization of the milka large informal milcerns on the qualitd.
KDB ACTIVIT
n
n
ment
OUTLETS
ookside, Doinyo Molo Milk
‐Milk bars/hotels
g milk
d milk
CTOR
k market in 1992 k market causing a y of the milk
TIES
Slide 9
Slide 10
Slide 11
M
• Kethe
• Unor micoprodereqsu
0
• Daco
• Daco
• Daco
• Dace
• Da
1 CA
• App
• Pro
• Mil
• Min
• Min
• Ass
• Mo
• Dai
• Pro
• Cot
• Coo
• Coo
MOI UNIV
1.KENYA DAREGUL
enya Dairy Board is e dairy Industry act
nder this Act, Kenyatheir appointed agilk collection centrettage industries, mocessing plants andetermine their comquirements of this bsequent Issuance
MILK SUP
airy farmers – collecnsumer.
airy farmers‐ small mllection centre – pr
airy farmers –small nsumers.
airy farmers – smallntre – milk bars/ho
airy farmers – consu
ATEGORIES OF INDUSTRY A
plication fee
oducer Licence
lk bar licence
ni Dairy licence
ni Dairy Licence
surance
ovement Permit
iry Manager
ocessor
ttage Industry
oling Plant (below 5000 lit
oling plant (Over 5000 litr
VERSITY A
IRY INDUSTRYLATIONSmandated to regultivities.
a Dairy Board inspegents shall inspect fes, transporters, miini dairies, milk d milk retailers to mpliance to the regulation and of permits/licence
PPLY CHAIN
ction centre – proce
mobile traders –rocessor – consume
mobile traders –
traders – collectiootels/shops – consu
umers
LICENCES: (DAACT CAP 336
‐ 600/=
‐ 1200/=
‐ 2500/=
‐ 2500/=
‐ 6000/=
‐ 2000/=
‐ 1000/=
‐ 1500/=
‐ 25,000/=
‐ 4000/=
tres) ‐ 1000/=
res) ‐ 2000/=
AGSHARE
40
Y
late
ctors farms, lk bars
.
essor –
er.
n umers
AIRY
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 12
Slide 13
Slide 14
T
MILK
• KDB monimilk testsbutterfat,adulterati
• Train andstandards
ENFIND
• Enforced in accorda
• Contract arrangeme
• Registration of dairsystem, Global stan
• Global markets are , production systemmost dairy produceon annual.
2.P
• To promoproducts
– Increaseand milk
– Demons
– Sensitizemilk.
Target – 20
Urban perperson/y
K QUALITY STA
itors compliance th – Density, preserva SNF, Toxins, antibioions and deception
d sensitize stakeholds
FORCEMENT ODUSTRY ACT Cance with the Act cap 336 – penalties.
ents between processors and farmers
ry producers to strengthen traceabilityndards focus on traceability as a factor
increasingly demanding to know – whm used. KDB has list of most dairy proders in the country. Some framers have
PROMOTIONA
te consumption of
e consumption of milk k products, yoghurt, C
strate methods of add
e the public on the nu
00 lts/per person/yea
r capita consumption –year
ANDARDS
hrough qualitative atives, acidity, otics, s.
ders on the
OF DAIRY CAP 336
y of milk produced, production r in food assurance.
ho are producing the milk,production duction system used. KDB has list of e registered and certificates issued
L ROLES
milk and milk
of certified quality heese, ice cream etc.
ing value of milk
tritional value of
r
– 125 lts/per
Slide 15
Slide 16
Slide 17
M
5
• Trathrbar
• OrgthethematranMa
• Accto o
• Tecpro
6
• Pro
• En
• Pro
7
• Ac
• Incca
• Rebu
• Ac
MOI UNIV
3.DEVELOP
ining of stakeholders (farmough field days, workshoprazas.
ganizations of the milk mae Ministry of Co‐operativee sector to promote formarketing organizations for nsportation, milk collectioarketing Federations are b
creditation of service provoffer services to stakehold
chnology Promotion (Corrocessing)
To the Mi
ovide technical trai
nsure prompt paym
omote market for m
To the Milk
ccess to quality milk
creased milk volumpacity.
educed costs througulking milk, training
ccess to technology/
VERSITY A
MENT ROLES
mers,traders processors),ps, demonstrations, ASK s
arketing channels – workie, Livestock Development,ation of strong farmers mefficient production, on and service provision. being promoted now.
viders along the milk valuders.
rect equipments , packagi
lk Producer
ning
ent
milk
k Processsor
k
me, sustained supply
gh farmer organizatg to minimize losses
/equipments
AGSHARE
41
on GMP shows,
ng with , NGOs in ilk
e chain
ng
y and
tions s
S
S
S
PROJECT
Slide 18
Slide 19
Slide 20
T
• Good qua
• A wide ra
• Reliable s
• Managem
• Advice therelated to
• Most dair
• Inadequatsector is s
• Long valuand imple
• Unregulat
• Frequent
• Poor infra
To the Consu
ality and safe milk p
nge of milk product
upply
Other Role
ment of dairy data b
e Government on ao the dairy industry
CHALLENG
ry producers are sm
te training opportustill low.
ue chain complicateementation of quali
ted feeds sector
disease outbreaks
astructure – water, e
umer
products
ts
es
bank
all policy issues
ES
mall scale
unities – private
es further meeting ity standards.
electricity, roads
Slide 21
Slide 22
M
1
• La
• Rasys
2 • Fas
per
• ‐ Prcam
• ThetheMepro
• Theensext
MOI UNIV
co
rge informal sector
ain dependent feed/stem
CONCstest growing sector. The rsons
romoting dairy in non tradmel milk, goat milk.
e need for training all thoe increasing demands/conedical certificates by Zamboducers, total solids in mil
e Board will remain a centsures the proper regulatioernally and also to promo
VERSITY A
ont
r
/ fodder production
CLUSIONentry of many young/ ret
ditional areas. and Inclusi
se along the value chain tnditions by external markebians, registration of dairyk (Uganda)
tralized regulatory body ton of the industry locally aote and develop the secto
AGSHARE
42
n
tired
on of
to meet et Ref. y
that and or.
S
PROJECT
Slide 23
T
• Dairy sectpromote iprocessin
• I CALL UPPROMOTIMILK PRO
cont
tor is growing stroninvestments in ming
ON ALL OF US TO CING CONSUMPTIONODUCTS
nger. Let us all i or major
CONTINUE N OF MILK AND
ReactioThe parcamels ithat daapproximnutritionpromoti Dr. Mosissues oDairy Binspecti When aissued tothat the
234
He reitecans we
When apowder board obe kepteveningCooperadomesticoncluddairy su
M
on to the rorticipants wain terms of
airy goats mating 300nal value wing dairy go
se wanted tof traceabiliBoard officing farms, pr
sked whetho farmers anboard uses 1. They do2. They co3. They co4. They tra
erated that cere ok for tra
asked about from elsew
fficial report by smallhg milk and ative Compic supply ided by sayinubsector face
MOI UNIV
le of Kenyaanted to knothe value anare reared after they
while dairy goat productio
the Dairy Bity of milk al reported romoting us
er the boardnd also to clthe followin
o on-spot tesonduct afflatonduct antibain milkers
ertificates wansporting.
the workabwhere and wrted that ch
holder farm15 cooler
pany imporis insufficieng that Brooes many cha
VERSITY A
a Dairy Boaow more abnd nutrition
d mainly iwere imporgoats sell aon in the are
oard officiato prepare that the bo
se of cooler
d had laboralarify use ofng measuresst with mobtoxin tests aiotics tests i
were require
bility of the why Brooksharcoal coolers. He addrs in Eldorrts powdereent. He reokside proceallenges.
AGSHARE
43
ard out the non
n aspects of in Elgeyo/Mrted from M
at Ksh 9,000ea.
al to throw sfarmers to
oard is senss and encou
atories for quf aluminums to addressile car kits
at specializein the office
ed for all mi
charcoal coside does ners are not ded that larret region wed milk to eiterated thessed milk w
PROJECT
n-traditional their dairy
Marakwet Meru. He rep0. He furthe
some light oaccess wid
sitizing farmuraging publ
uality testinand stainles the aforem
d labs e
lk producer
ooler at farmnot process
in use becarge scale fawere in plbridge the
hat the boawhere its fac
T
dairy sectoproducts. MCounty wiported that er reported
on what theder and globmers on traclic private p
ng and if cerss steel cont
mentioned qu
rs and assure
m level, themilk in Eld
ause there wfarmers hadlace. He ex
gap in locard regulatectory is loca
or like dairy Mr. Cheserekith their pgoat milk hthat FAO/I
e board wasbalized marceability of partnership.
rtificates wetainers, he r
uestions.
ed that Alum
e need to imdoret town,
was no exced modern coxplained thcal productes milk imated and rep
goats and k reported population has a high IFAD was
s doing on rkets. The
f products,
ere being reported
minum
mport milk the dairy
ss milk to oolers for
hat Kenya tion when
mports. He ported that
4
D
M
4.2 Ple
During the p
1. Nr
iii
2. Cp
3. Rb
4. F5. F6. B7. C
f8. W9. R
t
MOI UNIV
enary dis
panel discus
Noting that recommendi. Effort
/recommii. Constraiii. GOK exCollaboratioproblem ideRole of smabuilding. Farmers neeFarmers shoBottlenecksCollaboratiofarmers to aWhole valueResearch-Extrials and de
VERSITY A
scussion
ssion on the
farmers’ pded that:
should mmendations bints facing f
xtension servon among stentification.all traders i
ed to be enliould be assis in maize anon and cooravoid duplice chain apprxtension-Faemonstration
AGSHARE
44
on way
e way forwa
practices do
made to faby farmersfarmers in mvice should takeholders
in maize/da
ightened on sted to devend milk marrdination is
cation and garoach shoul
armer linkagns.
PROJECT
forward
ard it was it
not match
acilitate ad
maize/dairy be strengthis needed in
airy needs to
the best praelop proposarketing shous needed amaps in servicld be adoptege should b
T
d
resolved tha
recommen
doption of
should be tahened to meen research,
o be enhan
actices in mals for acquiuld be tacklemong organce delivery.
ed in researcbe strengthe
at:
nded practic
f technolo
ackled et demand bcapacity bu
nced through
maize and daisition of cred. izations dea
ch and extenened through
ces, it was
gies and
by farmers uilding and
h capacity
airy. edit.
aling with
nsion. h on-farm
4
S
M
4.3 Atte
S/No. Na
1. Bar
2. Law
3. Nic
4. Iren
5. Den
6. Mo
7. Dr.
8. Jan
9. Nel
10. Dr.
11. Ash
12. Piu
13. Fre
14. Ben
15. Em
16. Lea
17. Geo
18. JOh
19. Joy
MOI UNIV
endance Lis
ame
ranabas R. O
wrence O. M
cholas M. M
ne Tarus
nis C. Otien
ose Jared Isa
. Philip M. N
ne Tum
lson Sumba
. J.M. Mond
ha S. Salim
us Cheserek
edrick Wanj
n Limo
mmanuel Too
ah Boit
offrey Amu
hson Murre
yce Serem
VERSITY A
st
Olbarit
Mose
Mwambezi
no
aboke
Nyangweso
a
dothi
ala
o
usala
y
AGSHARE
45
Desig
Farm
Resea
DistriOffic
East A
Resea
Resea
Resea
Progr
Cerea
Distri
JUMA
Mana
Distri
Farm
Farm
Distri
Mana
Farm
Minis
PROJECT
gnation
mer
archer(KAR
ict Agricultuer(DALEO)
African Gra
archer/AgSh
archer/AgSh
archer/ AgS
ramme Offic
al Growers A
ict Veterina
AKAKA (M
ager, Kenya
ict Agricultu
mer-Kapsoya
mer-Kapsoya
ict Livestoc
ager –Maize
mer-Moiben
stry of Agric
T
RI)/Resource
ure and Liv) Eldoret Ea
ain Council(
hare Team m
hare Team m
Share Projec
cer ACDI/V
Association
ary Officer(D
Maize Farme
a Dairy Boar
ural Officer
a)(Elgeyo Bo
a)(Elgeyo Bo
ck Productio
e Milling Co
culture
e Person
estock Exteast
(EAGC)
member
member
ct Manager
VOCA
n
DVO)-Keiy
ers Group) T
rd, Eldoret
r’s office- N
order)
order)
on Officer –E
ompany
ension
yo South
Treasurer
Nandi North
Eldoret West
M
20. Sam
21. Laz
22. Dr.
23. Lau
24. Jam
25. Ulu
26. Far
27. Ok
28. Joh
29. Pet
30. Jos
MOI UNIV
muel Barma
zarus K. Ru
. Julius O. O
ura Inyanje
mes Gitaka
um Christin
rncis Oduor
kiiry Frankli
hn Karane
ter Rugu
shua Cheloti
VERSITY A
ase
uto
Ochuodho
Rotich
ne
r
ne
i
AGSHARE
46
Farm
Distri
Dean
FaculResou
Fish F
M.Ph
M.Ph
Resea
Farm
Farm
Biblia
PROJECT
mer-Ainabko
ict Livestoc
n, School of
lty, Departmurce Manag
FM radio st
hil Student/A
hil Student/A
archer
mer
mer
a Husema S
T
i Division
ck productio
Agriculture
ment of Econgement, Moi
ation
AgShare stu
AgShare stu
Studio
on Officer- M
e and Biotec
nomics and i University
udent partici
udent partici
Marakwet
chnology
Agriculturay
ipant
ipant
al