Modified from Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne Principles of Computer Operating Systems Lecture 23...

Modified from Silberschatz, Galvin and GagnePrinciples of Computer Operating Systems

Lecture 23

Chapter 16/18: Distributed Systems

2Principles of Computer Operating Systems

Chapter 16: Distributed System Structures

Motivation

Types of Network-Based Operating Systems

Network Structure

Network Topology

Communication Structure

Communication Protocols

Robustness

Design Issues

An Example: Networking


Chapter Objectives

To provide a high-level overview of distributed systems and the networks that interconnect them

To discuss the general structure of distributed operating systems


Motivation

Distributed system is collection of loosely coupled processors interconnected by a communications network

Processors variously called nodes, computers, machines, hosts

Site is location of the processor

Reasons for distributed systems

Resource sharing

sharing and printing files at remote sites

processing information in a distributed database

using remote specialized hardware devices

Computation speedup – load sharing

Reliability – detect and recover from site failure, function transfer, reintegrate failed site

Communication – message passing


A Distributed System


Network-Operating Systems

Users are aware of multiplicity of machines.

Access to resources of various machines is done explicitly by:

Remote logging into the appropriate remote machine (telnet, ssh)

Remote Desktop (Microsoft Windows)

Transferring data from remote machines to local machines, via the File Transfer Protocol (FTP) mechanism


Distributed-Operating Systems

Users not aware of multiplicity of machines

Access to remote resources similar to access to local resources

Data Migration

transfer data by transferring entire file, or

transferring only those portions of the file necessary for the immediate task

Computation Migration

transfer the computation, rather than the data, across the system


Distributed-Operating Systems (Cont.)

Process Migration

execute an entire process, or parts of it, at different sites

Load balancing

– distribute processes across network to even the workload

Computation speedup

– subprocesses can run concurrently on different sites

Hardware preference

– process execution may require specialized processor

Software preference

– required software may be available at only a particular site

Data access

– run process remotely, rather than transfer all data locally


Network Structure

Local-Area Network (LAN) – designed to cover small geographical area.

Multiaccess bus, ring, or star network

Speed 10 – 100 megabits/second

Broadcast is fast and cheap

Nodes:

usually workstations and/or personal computers

a few mainframes


Network Types (Cont.)

Wide-Area Network (WAN) – links geographically separated sites

Point-to-point connections over long-haul lines

often leased from a phone company

Speed 1.544 – 45 megbits/second

Broadcast usually requires multiple messages

Nodes:

usually a high percentage of mainframes


Network Topology

Sites in the system can be physically connected in a variety of ways;

They are compared with respect to the following criteria:

Installation cost

– How expensive is it to link the various sites in the system?

Communication cost

– How long does it take to send a message from site A to site B?

Reliability

– If a link or a site in the system fails, can the remaining sites still communicate with each other?

The various topologies are depicted as graphs whose nodes correspond to sites

An edge from node A to node B corresponds to a direct connection between the two sites


Network Topology


Communication Structure

Naming and name resolution

How do two processes locate each other to communicate?

Routing strategies

How are messages sent through the network?

Connection strategies

How do two processes send a sequence of messages?

Contention

The network is a shared resource, so how do we resolve conflicting demands for its use?

The design of a communication network must address four basic issues:


Naming and Name Resolution

Name systems in the network

Address messages with the process-id

Identify processes on remote systems by

<host-name, identifier> pair

Domain name service (DNS)

specifies the naming structure of the hosts, as well as name to address resolution (Internet)


Routing Strategies

Fixed routing: A path from A to B is specified in advance

Path changes only if a hardware failure disables it

Since the shortest path is usually chosen, communication costs are minimized

Fixed routing cannot adapt to load changes

Ensures that messages will be delivered in the order in which they were sent

Virtual circuit: A path from A to B is fixed for the duration of one session

Different sessions involving messages from A to B may have different paths

Partial remedy to adapting to load changes

Ensures that messages will be delivered in the order in which they were sent


Routing Strategies (Cont.)

Dynamic routing: The path used to send a message form site A to site B is chosen only when a message is sent

Usually a site sends a message to another site on the link least used at that particular time

Adapts to load changes by avoiding routing messages on heavily used path

Messages may arrive out of order

This problem can be remedied by appending a sequence number to each message


Connection Strategies

Circuit switching: A permanent physical link is established for the duration of the communication

i.e., telephone system

Message switching: A temporary link is established for the duration of one message transfer

i.e., post-office mailing system

Packet switching: Messages of variable length are divided into fixed-length packets which are sent to the destination

Each packet may take a different path through the network

The packets must be reassembled into messages as they arrive

Circuit switching requires setup time, but incurs less overhead for shipping each message, and may waste network bandwidth

Message and packet switching require less setup time, but incur more overhead per message


Contention

CSMA/CD - Carrier sense with multiple access (CSMA) with collision detection (CD)

A site determines whether another message is currently being transmitted over that link.

If two or more sites begin transmitting at exactly the same time, then they will register a CD and will stop transmitting

When the system is very busy, many collisions may occur, and thus performance may be degraded

CSMA/CD is used successfully in the Ethernet system

the most common network system

Several sites may want to transmit information over a link simultaneously. Techniques to avoid repeated collisions include:


Contention (Cont.)

Token passing: A unique message type, known as a token, continuously circulates in the system (usually a ring structure)

A site that wants to transmit information must wait until the token arrives

When the site completes its round of message passing, it retransmits the token

A token-passing scheme is used by some IBM and HP/Apollo systems

Message slots: A number of fixed-length message slots continuously circulate in the system (usually a ring structure)

Since a slot can contain only fixed-sized messages, a single logical message may have to be broken down into a number of smaller packets, each of which is sent in a separate slot

This scheme has been adopted in the experimental Cambridge Digital Communication Ring


Communication Via ISO Network Model


Communication Protocol

Physical layer: handles the mechanical and electrical details of the physical transmission of a bit stream

Data-link layer: handles the frames, or fixed-length parts of packets, including any error detection and recovery that occurred in the physical layer

Network layer: provides connections and routes packets in the communication network, including handling the address of outgoing packets, decoding the address of incoming packets, and maintaining routing information for proper response to changing load levels

The communication network is partitioned into the following multiple layers:


Communication Protocol (Cont.)

Transport layer: responsible for low-level network access and for message transfer between clients, including partitioning messages into packets, maintaining packet order, controlling flow, and generating physical addresses

Session layer: implements sessions, or process-to-process communications protocols

Presentation layer: resolves the differences in formats among the various sites in the network, including character conversions, and half duplex/full duplex (echoing)

Application layer: interacts directly with the users’ deals with file transfer, remote-login protocols and electronic mail, as well as schemas for distributed databases


The ISO Protocol Layer


The TCP/IP Protocol Layers


Design Issues

Transparency

the distributed system should appear as a conventional, centralized system to the user

Fault tolerance

the distributed system should continue to function in the face of failure

Scalability

as demands increase, the system should easily accept the addition of new resources to accommodate the increased demand

Clusters

a collection of semi-autonomous machines that acts as a single system


Chapter 18 Distributed Coordination

Event Ordering

Mutual Exclusion

Atomicity

Concurrency Control

Deadlock Handling

Election Algorithms

Reaching Agreement


Chapter Objectives

To describe various methods for achieving mutual exclusion in a distributed system

To explain how atomic transactions can be implemented in a distributed system

To show how some of the concurrency-control schemes can be modified for use in a distributed environment

To present schemes for handling deadlock prevention, deadlock avoidance, and deadlock detection in a distributed system


Event Ordering

Happened-before relation (denoted by )

If A and B are events in the same process, and A was executed before B, then A B

If A is the event of sending a message by one process and B is the event of receiving that message by another process, then A B

If A B and B C then A C


Implementation of

Associate a timestamp with each system event

Require that for every pair of events A and B, if A B, then the timestamp of A is less than the timestamp of B

Within each process Pi a logical clock, LCi is associated

The logical clock can be implemented as a simple counter that is incremented between any two successive events executed within a process

Logical clock is monotonically increasing

A process advances its logical clock when it receives a message whose timestamp is greater than the current value of its logical clock

If the timestamps of two events A and B are the same, then the events are concurrent

We may use the process identity numbers to break ties and to create a total ordering


Distributed Mutual Exclusion (DME)

Assumptions

The system consists of n processes;

Each process Pi resides at a different processor

Each process has a critical section that requires mutual exclusion

Requirement

If Pi is executing in its critical section, then no other process Pj is executing in its critical section

We present two algorithms to ensure the mutual exclusion execution of processes in their critical sections


DME: Centralized Approach

One of the processes in the system is chosen to coordinate the entry to the critical section

A process that wants to enter its critical section sends a request message to the coordinator

The coordinator decides which process can enter the critical section next, and its sends that process a reply message

When the process receives a reply message from the coordinator,

it enters its critical section

After exiting its critical section,

the process sends a release message to the coordinator and proceeds with its execution

This scheme requires three messages per critical-section entry: request reply release


DME: Fully Distributed Approach

When process Pi wants to enter its critical section, it generates a new timestamp, TS, and sends the message request (Pi, TS) to all other processes in the system

When process Pj receives a request message, it may reply immediately or it may defer sending a reply back

When process Pi receives a reply message from all other processes in the system, it can enter its critical section

After exiting its critical section, the process sends reply messages to all its deferred requests


DME: Fully Distributed Approach (Cont)

The decision whether process Pj replies immediately to a request(Pi, TS) message or defers its reply is based on three factors:

If Pj is in its critical section, then it defers its reply to Pi

If Pj does not want to enter its critical section, then it sends a reply immediately to Pi

If Pj wants to enter its critical section but has not yet entered it, then it compares its own request timestamp with the timestamp TS

If its own request timestamp is greater than TS, then it sends a reply immediately to Pi (Pi asked first)

Otherwise, the reply is deferred


Desirable Behavior of Fully Distributed Approach

Freedom from Deadlock is ensured

Freedom from starvation is ensured, since entry to the critical section is scheduled according to the timestamp ordering

The timestamp ordering ensures that processes are served in a first-come, first served order

The number of messages per critical-section entry is

2 x (n – 1)

This is the minimum number of required messages per critical-section entry when processes act independently and concurrently


Three Undesirable Consequences

The processes need to know the identity of all other processes in the system, which makes the dynamic addition and removal of processes more complex

If one of the processes fails, then the entire scheme collapses

This can be dealt with by continuously monitoring the state of all the processes in the system

Processes that have not entered their critical section must pause frequently to assure other processes that they intend to enter the critical section

This protocol is therefore suited for small, stable sets of cooperating processes


Token-Passing Approach

Circulate a token among processes in system

Token is special type of message

Possession of token entitles holder to enter critical section

Processes logically organized in a ring structure

Unidirectional ring guarantees freedom from starvation

Two types of failures

Lost token – election must be called

Failed processes – new logical ring established


Atomicity

Either all the operations associated with a program unit are executed to completion, or none are performed

Ensuring atomicity in a distributed system requires a transaction coordinator, which is responsible for the following:

Starting the execution of the transaction

Breaking the transaction into a number of subtransactions, and distribution these subtransactions to the appropriate sites for execution

Coordinating the termination of the transaction, which may result in the transaction being committed at all sites or aborted at all sites


Election Algorithms

Determine where a new copy of the coordinator should be restarted

Assume that a unique priority number is associated with each active process in the system, and assume that the priority number of process Pi is i

Assume a one-to-one correspondence between processes and sites

The coordinator is always the process with the largest priority number. When a coordinator fails, the algorithm must elect that active

process with the largest priority number

Two algorithms, the bully algorithm and a ring algorithm, can be used to elect a new coordinator in case of failures


Bully Algorithm

Applicable to systems where every process can send a message to every other process in the system

If process Pi sends a request that is not answered by the coordinator within a time interval T, assume that the coordinator has failed;

Pi tries to elect itself as the new coordinator

Pi sends an election message to every process with a higher priority number, Pi then waits for any of these processes to answer within T

If no response within T, assume that all processes with numbers greater than i have failed; Pi elects itself the new coordinator

If answer is received, Pi begins time interval T´, waiting to receive a message that a process with a higher priority number has been elected If no message is sent within T´, assume the process with a higher

number has failed; Pi should restart the algorithm


Bully Algorithm (Cont)

If Pi is not the coordinator, then, at any time during execution, Pi may receive one of the following two messages from process Pj

Pj is the new coordinator (j > i). Pi, in turn, records this information

Pj started an election (j > i). Pi, sends a response to Pj and begins its own election algorithm, provided that Pi has not already initiated such an election

After a failed process recovers, it immediately begins execution of the same algorithm

If there are no active processes with higher numbers, the recovered process forces all processes with lower number to let it become the coordinator process, even if there is a currently active coordinator with a lower number


Ring Algorithm

Applicable to systems organized as a ring (logically or physically)

Assumes that the links are unidirectional, and that processes send their messages to their right neighbors

Each process maintains an active list, consisting of all the priority numbers of all active processes in the system when the algorithm ends

If process Pi detects a coordinator failure, it creates a new active list that is initially empty.

It then sends a message elect(i) to its right neighbor, and adds the number i to its active list


Ring Algorithm (Cont)

If Pi receives a message elect(j) from the process on the left, it must respond in one of three ways:

1. If this is the first elect message it has seen or sent, Pi creates a new active list with the numbers i and j

It then sends the message elect(i), followed by the message elect(j)

2. If i j, then the active list for Pi now contains the numbers of all the active processes in the system

Pi can now determine the largest number in the active list to identify the new coordinator process

3. If i = j, then Pi receives the message elect(i)

The active list for Pi contains all the active processes in the system

Pi can now determine the new coordinator process.


Reaching Agreement

There are applications where a set of processes wish to agree on a common “value”

Such agreement may not take place due to:

Faulty communication medium

Faulty processes

Processes may send garbled or incorrect messages to other processes

A subset of the processes may collaborate with each other in an attempt to defeat the scheme


Faulty Communications

Process Pi at site A, has sent a message to process Pj at site B;

to proceed, Pi needs to know if Pj has received the message

Detect failures using a time-out scheme

When Pi sends out a message, it also specifies a time interval during which it is willing to wait for an acknowledgment message form Pj

When Pj receives the message,

it immediately sends an acknowledgment to Pi

If Pi receives the acknowledgment message within the specified time interval,

it concludes that Pj has received its message

If a time-out occurs, Pj needs to retransmit its message and wait for an acknowledgment


Faulty Communications (Cont)

Continue until Pi either receives an acknowledgment, or is notified by the system that B is down

Suppose that Pj also needs to know that Pi has received its acknowledgment message, in order to decide on how to proceed

In the presence of failure,

it is not possible to accomplish this task

It is not possible in a distributed environment for processes Pi and Pj to agree completely on their respective states


Faulty Processes(Byzantine Generals Problem)

Communication medium is reliable, but processes can fail in unpredictable ways

Consider a system of n processes, of which no more than m are faulty

Suppose that each process Pi has some private value of Vi

Devise an algorithm that allows each non-faulty Pi to construct a vector Xi = (Ai,1, Ai,2, …, Ai,n) such that

If Pj is a nonfaulty process, then Aij = Vj.

If Pi and Pj are both non-faulty processes, then Xi = Xj.

Solutions share the following properties

A correct algorithm can be devised only if n 3 x m + 1

The worst-case delay for reaching agreement is proportionate to m + 1 message-passing delays


Faulty Processes (Cont)

An algorithm for the case where m = 1 and n = 4 requires two rounds of information exchange:

Each process sends its private value to the other 3 processes

Each process sends the information it has obtained in the first round to all other processes

If a faulty process refuses to send messages,

a non-faulty process can choose an arbitrary value and pretend that that value was sent by that process

After the two rounds are completed, a non-faulty process Pi can construct its vector Xi = (Ai,1, Ai,2, Ai,3, Ai,4) as follows:

Ai,j = Vi

For j i, if at least two of the three values reported for process Pj agree, then the majority value is used to set the value of Aij

Otherwise, a default value (nil) is used

Modified from Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne Principles of Computer Operating Systems Lecture 23...

Documents

Transcript of Modified from Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne Principles of Computer Operating Systems Lecture 23...