Modern State of Cosmology V.N. Lukash Astro Space Centre of Lebedev Physics Institute Cherenkov...
-
Upload
evelyn-wade -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of Modern State of Cosmology V.N. Lukash Astro Space Centre of Lebedev Physics Institute Cherenkov...
Modern State of CosmologyModern State of Cosmology
VV..NN.. Lukash LukashAstro Space Centre of Astro Space Centre of
Lebedev Physics InstituteLebedev Physics Institute
Cherenkov Conference-2004
• Observational status• Structure formations• Initial conditions• Cosmological parameters• Degeneracies
h cb, nS
, 8
• Minimal model and its extensions• Problems
7.03.0
h3/1
m
bSn
7.0e8
Cosmic Hubble parameter
Tegmark et al., 2003
Observational status
0.02
Coincidence between two
scales:
LSS (DM) and CMB (DB)
LSS and CMB scales
z < zeq: 2~
1
1
za
3
1100
3200
z
z
rec
eq
2
eq
rec
eqeq
1k
recrecSrec
3
c
1k
Keq-1DM
Krec-1
B
x
,
LSS :
CMB :
13k
k
eq
rec
rec
eq
Message from the early Universe:
Baryon asymmetry is related to dark matter
Independent determination of initial and boundary conditions
Theory of gravitational instability
• Zero order(Hubble diagram)
• First order(density perturbations spectrum)
Cosmological model – in two functions
(t)a
)z,k(P
fc , fb , f FU (late) m X
Model IU (early) AS nS S AT nT
LSS spectrum
CMB spectrum k
dk)k(W)k(PС
)z,k(T)k(P)z,k(P 2IU FU
IU FU
+ ( T )
Data mapping in k-space
k
dk)k(Pd ii
data point :
k
dk)k(P)k(WС
window spectrum probability distribution in k space
CMB :
P(k)
104 k
Tegmark, Zaldarriaga, 2002
Tegmark, Zaldarriaga, 2002
Cosmological initial conditions
Generation of density perturbations in the very early Universe
• Seeds – quantum vacuum fluctuations of density (phonons)
• Parametric amplification of density perturbations in the expanding Universe – spontaneous creation of phonons,
k ~ kH ~ 1 mm-1
• Stretching inhomogeneities on cosmological scales by inflation,
k >> kH ~ 1100 Мpc-1
dxdxhdtdx,C2dtD21ds 222 aa
,BAh2
1 ,v;D1u i
aa HvAHvq
qdtH
aa
,G4 C2
a H
q
p 2
CC
p
2
3
H
H2
p2 2
2
Lagrangian theory of
q field (V.N.L., 1980):
In conformal coordinates:
,,
222 qqqL
a
0qq2H3q 2
2a
k
0qUq 2
qq a
aa
)(
)(UU
Observational constraints on inflationary models
V(): classification of potentials
)exp(~)(V
~)(V
:0V
Large field inflation
Small field inflation
(hybrid)-inflation
C
0 1V)(V
:0V
4c;4
1V)(V
:0)0(V,0V
2С
С0
Models and observational quantities (T/S - nS)
-inflation (=4)
Е.V.Mikheeva, V.N.Lukash, 2004
0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,20,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
c=80
c=22
c=12
c=9
c=7
T/S
nS
M.Tegmark et al., 2003
V()~1-(/*)2
0.9
0.6
0.3
WMAP + SDSS r = -8nT T/S = 0.6 r
• Chaotic inflation:
m2 - solid grounds
4 - severe trouble
• If nS>1 - -inflation
nS<1 - «chaotic» or «new» or …
• Inflationary model will be recognized in
the nearest future
Minimal modelnS=1 0=1
T/S=0
f=0
degeneracies: geometry tensor neutrino
4 parameters of MM:(error bars <10%)
84.0
023.0
123.0
7.0
17.0
8
b
c
A large number of observational points (~ 2000) can be fitted by only four parameters of MM
Reionization puzzle
QSO end of reionization: z~10
Evolution of star formation: flat out to z~6
Most distant galaxy: z~10 QSO: z=6.41
Two reionization epochs ?z~20 (massive stars)
z~10 (normal stars, QSO)
Arguments for >0
• Hubble diagram: SN Ia (correction for metallicity?)
• Dynamics: ISW (galaxies at z~0.5)
• Structure: P(k)
z11
a
3.014.0
)2.0( 2
m
2
m
hm 2mm h
LSS CMB
Reiss et al., 2002
Riess et al., 2004
N.Kardashev, ApJ 150, L135 (1967)
Dynamical impact of vacuumcross-correlation between maps of galaxies and CMB
~~G4 m aa2 ,const
,-1а
m
m
4aa
4
3
2m2 Th
~H
Keq=aH~mh2=mh (h/Mpc)
,h~h
~H:eq22
m
2m22
a
a 2mh~
1
a
Structure argument(solid!)
CMB
LSS
... and counter-arguments
• Weak lensing (m~1)• Problems of CDM:
– absence of cusps in galaxy centres (stability of galaxy bars)
– absence of substructure in galaxy halos (stability of spiral pattern in galaxy disks)
– small number of low-massive galaxies– flat luminosity and correlation functions
of galaxies
Myers et al., 2003
Angular cross-correlation between distant QSOs
and nearby clusters of galaxies (APM/SDSS)
Substructure in galaxy halo(simulations)
Diemand et al., 2004
~r -
(1, 3/2)
Among best-fit models(WMAP & 2dF)
m=1, =0=0.2, c=0.7
H0= 45 km s-1 Mpc-1
↓contradiction:
• local H0 (6070 km s-1 Mpc-1)(SZ, gravitational lenses: 50 20)
• SN Ia• cluster evolution• Ly
Degeneracies in cosmological parameter space
(reason – bad data,
region – 10 % of ММ):
geometrical (mh2 ~ const, 0 )
tensor (nS ~ fb )
neutrino (m ~ f)
Geometrical degeneracy(0=1.010.02)
h05 = 0.7
T0 = 13.5 05/2 Gyrs
Hubble constant and the age of the Universe vs tot
Tegmark et al., 2003
Tegmark et al., 2003
If m<0.7 eV, then
• z<zrec (3T m: z 103 [m/0.7 eV])
h2 = m/93 eV < 0.02 bh2
• f / m < 0.2 (for mh2 > 0.1)
CMB ⇒ cbh2
m= cb+ , m(1- f)=const cb (fixed by CMB)
+ af = b
(m+ = 1, a = cb , b = 1 - cb)
+ 0.5 f = 0.65 0.1
Arhipova et al., 2002
73.0n m
66.0f7.0
Novosyadlyj et al., 2000
Cosmological parameters CMB LSS
no GW,
+GW, no +GW,,BBN
mh2 0.14 0.12 0.16
mh 0.2 0.17 0.25
bh2 0.021 0.025 0.020
fb 0.15 0.22 0.10
f - - 0.05
nS 1.0 1.1 1.1
T/S - 0.2 0.3
0 0 0
0.7 0.8 0.6
ConclusionsConclusions
• Breaking degeneracy between initial and boundary conditions in cosmology
• Stable prediction:
nS 1, 0, 0.60.7
• Best-fit model: f ~ fb ~ 10%, m ~ 0.4, h ~ 0.65
(MM: fb ~ 15%, m ~ 0.3, h~ 0.7)
• If m 0.3 , then 0, h 0.7
m > 0.3 , 0.1, h < 0.7
• ???
m 0.04 0.4 eV
(f<0.1: m <0.4 eV)
early ionization (z~20)
T/S 0.2
small C2, C3
distortions ~30, 200
high 2
the running parameter
Unsolved fundamental problems:
• Dark matter (multicomponent):
b , c~m~
• Cosmological constant: ~M4 = (10-3eV)4=
standard model: M ~1 TeV
GUT: M ~1013 GeV
quantum gravity: M ~1019 GeV
• Coincidence of СМВ and LSS scales
(relation between baryon asymmetry and dark matter)
• T/S → energy scale of inflation
2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey
O.Lahav et al., 2002
Beyond concordance model: opt ~ 0.17
• Low C2,3, deviations (>3) at l~30, 200
• Rolling of spectral index• Poor 2 of concordance model (others in 1)• Spectral excess at l~2500 (CBI, ACBAR)
QSO: end of reionization at z~6
Evolution of star formation: flat out to z~6
Most distant galaxy: z=6.56
QSO: z=6.41
New: two reionization epochs
At z~20 (massive stars, QSO)
At z~6 (normal stars, QSO)
T.Shanks, astro-ph/0401409
Cross-correlation between WMAP (94 GHz) and galaxy clusters (АСО, R2)
T.Shanks, astro-ph/0401409