Modeling the Competitive Dynamics Between Native and ...
Transcript of Modeling the Competitive Dynamics Between Native and ...
Modeling the Competitive Dynamics Between
Native and Invasive Grasses Under Varying
Light Conditions
Presenters: Kristen Schultz and Ann Adams
Co-authors: Dr. Kelly Lyons and Dr. Eddy Kwessi
Trinity University, San Antonio
Integrated Research in Biomathematics (NSF)
What causes these patterns?
Coexistence can only occur when there is niche partitioning and
reduction in fitness difference between two species
What mechanisms allow invasive species to outcompete
native species?
Does light exposure affect the competition dynamics
between native and invasive grass species?
Overall Questions
Sensitivity Value
Sensitivity of a species to
interspecific competition
Growth rate of a species
in monoculture
Growth rate of a species in
interspecific competition
Growth rate of a species
in monoculture
₌₋
Competitive Dynamics: Niche Difference
Niche difference =Average effect of competition
on two competing species
AM1
Slide 10
AM1 not sure what to do in regards for putting words in the place of the equation symbolsAnn Marie, 10/7/2014
Competitive Dynamics: Relative Fitness
Difference
Relative Fitness
Difference
Variability in the effect
of competition on two
competing species=
Experimental Design
Focal native species: Sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula) and little
bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium)
Focal invasive species: King Ranch bluestem (Bothriochloa ischaemum)
Conclusions
• KR competes less efficiently in low-light conditions
• SOG and LBS are more competitive in low-light
conditions
• Early facilitation may help SOG compete with KR
Why should we care?
• Focus native grass restoration efforts in
shaded areas
• SOG as staple species in restoration efforts
Acknowledgements
• Dr. James Shinkle and Dr. Jonathon King
• Austin Phillippe, Elizabeth Van Horn, Aaron
Skinner, Chris Robinson and Anh-Viet Dinh
• NSF and Integrated Research in
Biomathematics (IRBM)