MODELING OF SEASONING OF REACTORS: EFFECTS OF ION … · 2006-11-18 · ANKUR_AVS06SS_02...
Transcript of MODELING OF SEASONING OF REACTORS: EFFECTS OF ION … · 2006-11-18 · ANKUR_AVS06SS_02...
MODELING OF SEASONING OF REACTORS: EFFECTS OF ION ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS TO
CHAMBER WALLS*
Ankur Agarwala) and Mark J. Kushnerb)
a)Department of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
[email protected])Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, [email protected]
http://uigelz.ece.iastate.edu
53rd AVS Symposium, November 2006
*Work supported by the SRC and NSF
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
AGENDA
• Seasoning of plasma reactors
• Approach and Methodology
• Hybrid Plasma Equipment Model
• Surface Chemistry Model
• Si etching in Ar/Cl2• Effect of seasoning reactor walls on etch rates
• Sputtering of quartz window
• Concluding Remarks
ANKUR_AVS06SS_Agenda
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
SEASONING OF PLASMA REACTORS
• Deposition on reactor walls during a process changes surface reactivity (e.g., seasoning)
• Seasoning changes reactive fluxes to substrate. To control wafer-to-wafer variability:
• Clean the seasoned chamber following each wafer.
• Season the chamber prior to process step.
ANKUR_AVS06SS_01
Ref: E.S. Aydil et al., JES 150, G418 (2003)
Ref: G. Cunge et al., PSST 14, S42 (2005)
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
SEASONING: CHALLENGES
ANKUR_AVS06SS_02
• Understanding the role that chamber condition plays in manufacturing variability is important.
• Modeling Challenges:
• Energetic Etch products; products not thermalized• Ion energy distributions are different on different
surfaces of reactor.• Reactivity of surface changes during a process as well
as run-to-run.
• In this talk, seasoning of reactor will be computationally investigated while accounting for variation of IEDs and reactivity on all surfaces.
• Electromagnetics Module: Antenna generated electric and magnetic fields
• Electron Energy Transport Module: Beam and bulk generated sources and transport coefficients.
• Fluid Kinetics Module: Electron and Heavy Particle Transport, Poisson’s equation
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
HYBRID PLASMA EQUIPMENT MODEL (HPEM)
ANKUR_AVS06SS_03
• Plasma Chemistry MC Module: IEADs to surfaces
• Surface Chemistry Module: Surface coverage and reactive sticking coefficients.
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
SURFACE CHEMISTRY MODULE (SCM)
ANKUR_AVS06SS_04
• Surface Chemistry Module (SCM) is an integrated module in HPEM to address surface reactions on substrate and walls of the reactor.
• The SCM:
• Uses the reactant fluxes from the plasma modules.• Applies a user defined reaction mechanism• Updates surface sticking and product reflection coefficients
for the plasma species.• Calculates surface coverages and etch rates.
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
SURFACE REACTION PROBABILITIES: IMPLEMENTATION
ANKUR_AVS06SS_05
• Surface reaction probabilities are a function ion energies.
• Processes with threshold energies are extremely sensitive to details of IEADs: εave < εth but rate could still be finite.
• Compute IEADs to all surfaces in reactor continuously during time evolution of process.
• Obtain surface probabilities vs position from convolution with p(x,ε)
∫∫=
εε
εεε
dxf
dpxfxp
ions
ions
),(
)(),()(
Si ETCHING IN Ar/Cl2: WAFER SURFACE MECHANISM
• Cl adsorbs on forming SiClx passivation layer.
Cl(g) + Si(s) → SiCl(s), p=0.99
Cl(g) + SiCln(s) → SiCln+1(s) p=0.2
• Ions etch passivation (for 200eV).
Cl+(g) + SiCl(s) → SiCl2(g), p=0.3
Cl+(g) + SiCl3(s) → SiCl4(g), p=0.6
M+(g) + SiClx(s) → SiClx(g) p=0.6
• Etch products further passivates, creating etch blocks.
SiCl2(g) + Si(s) → Si2Cl2(s) p=0.3
SiCl2(g) + SiCln(s) → Si2Cln+2 p=0.1-0.2
ANKUR_AVS06SS_06
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
Si ETCHING IN Ar/Cl2: WALL SURFACE MECHANISM
ANKUR_AVS06SS_07
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
• On chamber walls
SiCl2(g) + W(s) → SiCl2(s) p=0.2
SiCl2(g) + SiCl2(s) → (no reaction)
M+(g) + SiCl2(s) → SiCl(s) + Cl(g)p=0.6
M+(g) + SiCl2(s) → SiCl2(g) + W(s) p=0.6
• Passivated walls effect reactivityof Cl.
Cl(g) + W(s) → Cl(s) p=0.1
Cl(g) + Cl(a) → Cl2(g) + W(s) p=0.1
Cl(g) + SiCl2(s) → (no reaction)
Si ETCHING IN Ar/Cl2
• Seasoning investigated for Si etch products in Ar/Cl2.
• Base case conditions:
• Ar/Cl2 = 90/10, 100 sccm• 15 mTorr, 300 W• 50 V bias at 5 MHz
• Silicon etching by chlorine is the source SiClx.
• Transport of SiClx results in deposition (and further sputter/etch) on other surfaces.
ANKUR_AVS06SS_08
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
Si ETCHING IN Ar/Cl2:REACTANT FLUXES
ANKUR_AVS06SS_09
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
• Dominant ions are Ar+ and Cl+due to dissociation of Cl2.
• Dominant neutrals are Cl, SiCl2and SiCl4.
• SiCl2 is potentially reactive with surfaces; SiCl4 is not.
• Ar/Cl2=90/10, 100 sccm, 15 mTorr, 300 W, 50 V at 5 MHz.
Si ETCH: ION ENERGY ANGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS
• Ion energies on wafer are 50-75 eV, elevated above applied voltage due to dc bias.
• Ion energies on other reactor walls peak at time averaged floating plasma potential (40 V).
• Reactivity of wafer and walls differ due to differences in threshold energies and IEDs
• Ar/Cl2 = 90/10, 100 sccm, 15 mTorr, 300 W, 50 V at 5 MHz
ANKUR_AVS06SS_10
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
SURFACE COVERAGES: WAFER
• Surface site coverages depend on bias voltage.
• Surface coverage of SiCl2 and SiCl3decreases with increasing bias.
• More rapid removal of higher chlorinated sites.
• SiCl fraction increases as removal rate of higher chlorinated sites uncovers native Si.
• Ar/Cl2=90/10, 100 sccm, 15 mTorr, 300 W
ANKUR_AVS06SS_11
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
• Surface coverages after 1 min.
SURFACE COVERAGES: REACTOR WALLS
• Surface coverage of walls depend on wafer surface kinetics.
• Low biases: Etch products not significant in the bulk plasma. Sites dominated by Cl(s).
• High biases: Large production of etch products produce higher SiCland SiCl2 surface coverage.
• Etch products’ surface coverage ultimately saturate with time at about 0.25-0.30.
ANKUR_AVS06SS_12
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
• Ar/Cl2=90/10, 100 sccm, 15 mTorr, 300 W
• Surface coverages after 1 min.
SEASONING EFFECT: ETCH RATE
• Si etch for 1 min for each wafer.
• Etch rate in seasoned chamber decreases.
• Passivation of walls by SiCl2decreases further reactivity of SiCl2increasing density in plasma.
• SiCl2 passivates wafer SiClx sites forming Si2Cly etch blocks.
SiCl2(g) + SiCln(s) → Si2Cln+2(s)
• Ions removes Si2Cly with no net contribution to etch rate.
• Rate of change of etch rate decreases with number of wafers; chamber wall conditions stabilize.
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
• Ar/Cl2=90/10, 100 sccm, 10 mTorr, 300 W, 75 V at 5 MHz
Wafer
ANKUR_AVS06SS_13
SEASONED CHAMBER ETCH RATE: VOLTAGE• Si etch rates decrease in seasoned
chamber.
• With additional wafers, etch rates stabilize as chamber reaches final state.
• Etch rate stabilizes sooner at higher voltages.
• Higher etch rates and more etch products season chamber faster.
• Larger ion energies remove overlying Si2Cln more rapidly.
• In spite of lower reactivity of Cl on walls (and larger Cl in plasma), etch rates decrease due to site blockage.
ANKUR_AVS06SS_14
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
• Ar/Cl2=90/10, 100 sccm, 10 mTorr, 300 W
Si ETCH: QUARTZ SPUTTER
• Capacitive coupling of coils was included to facilitate sputtering of O atoms from the quartz window.
• Base case conditions:
• Ar/Cl2 = 90/10, 100 sccm• 15 mTorr, 300 W• 50 V substrate bias at 5 MHz
• The voltage at the “turns” was fixed at
• 300 V (turn 1)• 400 V (2)• 500 V (3)
to emulate inductive voltage drop across coil.
ANKUR_AVS06SS_15
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
QUARTZ SPUTTER: SURFACE MECHANISM
• Ion sputtering of top quartz window is the source of O in the plasma.
M+(g) + Quartz(s) → O(g)
p=1.0 at 200 eV (εth= 60 eV)
• O in bulk plasma may under go electron impact reactions (e.g., ionization).
• Surface reaction mechanism (any occurrence of SixCly)
ANKUR_AVS06SS_16
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
O(g) + SixCly(s) → SiOCl(s) p=1.0
M+(g) + SixOCly(s) → SixCly(s) + O(g) + M(g) p=1.0 at 200 eV (εth= 60 eV)
IEADs: CAPACITIVE COUPLING
• Ion induced sputtering of O from quartz through capacitive coupling of coils.
• Total IEADs peaks are near the sputter threshold of quartz.
• O species adsorb on the wafer, forming SixOCly etch blocks.
• Energetic ion bombardment on the wafer may remove the etch block.
• Ar/Cl2=90/10, 100 sccm, 15 mTorr, 300 W, 50 V bias at 5 MHz
ANKUR_AVS06SS_17
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
SiOCl PASSIVATION: WAFER and METAL WALL
ANKUR_AVS06SS_18
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
• For t < 0, ICP only with capacitive coupling produces O atoms from quartz and SiOCl etch blocks on wafer.
• At t=0, bias is applied, removing SiOCl etch blocks and increasing density of etch products.
• O atoms adsorb on etch product passivated sidewalls as SiOCl.
QUARTZ SPUTTER: IMPACT ON ETCH RATE
• Capacitive coupling (O atom sputtering) reduces etch rates at low voltages.
• O atoms adsorb on wafer forming SiOCl (an etch block) which is not removed.
• Large bias voltages increases ion energies and sputters the etch block restoring higher etch rates.
ANKUR_AVS06SS_19
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
• Ar/Cl2=90/10, 100 sccm, 15 mTorr, 300 W
• Pathway to decrease in etch rate
O(g) + SixCly(s) → SiOCl(s) p=1.0
M+(g) + SiOCl(s) → SiCl(s) + O(g) p=1.0 at 200 eV (εth= 60 eV)
CHANGE IN CAPACITIVE COUPLING
• The degree of capacitive coupling from the coils was reduced by moving coils above the dielectric window.
• Reduced capacitive coupling reduces ion energies onto the quartz (less sputtering).
ANKUR_AVS06SS_20
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
CAPACITIVE COUPLING: ETCH RATE
• Reduction in capacitive coupling
• Lower ion energies
• Sputter O atoms density lower.
• O atom adsorption on wafer forming SiOCl are less rate-limiting.
• At higher voltages, the etch rate increases due to less energy absorbing O in the plasma.
• Ion flux increases
ANKUR_AVS06SS_21
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
• Ar/Cl2=90/10, 100 sccm, 15 mTorr, 300 W
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
CONCLUDING REMARKS• Chamber seasoning was investigated in Si etch using Ar/Cl2
plasmas.
• IED integrated with Surface Chemistry Model to update wall recombination coefficients; change surface loss rates.
• Etch rates decreased in a seasoned chamber.
• Seasoned reactor increases SiCl2 flux back to wafer.• Feedback of etch products (SiCl2) from the plasma form
SixCly etch blocks.• Removal of SixCly does not contribute to etch rate.
• Sputtering of quartz window is a source of O atoms.
• O atoms adsorb on wafer forming etch block.• Reduction of etch rates at low biases• At large bias, SiOCl removed.
ANKUR_AVS06SS_22