Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks Ajay Mahimkar...
-
Upload
meredith-phelps -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks Ajay Mahimkar...
![Page 1: Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks Ajay Mahimkar mahimkar@ece.utexas.edu The University of Texas at Austin March 24, 2004.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfdf1a28abf838cb2dd8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks
Ajay [email protected]
The University of Texas at AustinMarch 24, 2004
![Page 2: Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks Ajay Mahimkar mahimkar@ece.utexas.edu The University of Texas at Austin March 24, 2004.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfdf1a28abf838cb2dd8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Sensor Networks – Goals & Challenges Distributed Sensing of physical phenomena
Establish paths between point(s) of interest & observer(s) Base Station / Aggregators
Sensor Networks are extremely resource-constrained
Energy – the most critical Lifetime & utility of sensor network – determined by energy
usage Computational and Communication Capabilities
Communication Pattern Data-centric
Applications Battlefield Surveillance, Nuclear Attack Detection, Real-
time Traffic Monitoring, Wireless Meter Reading
![Page 3: Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks Ajay Mahimkar mahimkar@ece.utexas.edu The University of Texas at Austin March 24, 2004.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfdf1a28abf838cb2dd8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Problem Statement
Energy consumption occurs due to Sensing Data processing and communication
Protocols that extend network lifetime are useful
Query Dissemination and Information Aggregation in an energy-efficient way
![Page 4: Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks Ajay Mahimkar mahimkar@ece.utexas.edu The University of Texas at Austin March 24, 2004.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfdf1a28abf838cb2dd8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Existing Approaches Directed Diffusion [C. Intanagonwiwat, 2003]
The base station / end user queries the network by broadcasting interest message
Sensors possessing the information respond via multi-hop communication
Information aggregated at each hop
![Page 5: Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks Ajay Mahimkar mahimkar@ece.utexas.edu The University of Texas at Austin March 24, 2004.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfdf1a28abf838cb2dd8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Existing Approaches (contd….) Power Efficient Algorithms
LEACH (Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy) [W. Heinzelman, 2000]
Clusters formed in a self-organized manner in each round of data collection
Cluster-Head responsible for data aggregation PEGASIS (Power-Efficient Gathering in Sensor
Information Systems) [S. Lindsey, 2002] Instead of multiple cluster-heads (as in LEACH), only one
designated node sends the aggregated data to base station
Key idea – form a chain among sensor nodes PEDAP (Power-Efficient Data gathering and
Aggregation Protocol) [H. O. Tan, 2003] MST based routing scheme using energy as the metric
![Page 6: Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks Ajay Mahimkar mahimkar@ece.utexas.edu The University of Texas at Austin March 24, 2004.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfdf1a28abf838cb2dd8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Evaluation PEGASIS outperforms LEACH by avoiding the overhead
of dynamic cluster-head formation PEDAP better than both LEACH & PEGASIS
Balances the energy consumption among the nodes
![Page 7: Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks Ajay Mahimkar mahimkar@ece.utexas.edu The University of Texas at Austin March 24, 2004.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083010/5697bfdf1a28abf838cb2dd8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Project Plan Model sensors
Radio Battery Model
Model communication paradigm Communication schedule Sleep/wake-up nodes Asynchronous triggering of sensors
Performance Model In-network Processing and Data Aggregation
Integrating with network simulators NS-2, TinyOS (TOSSIM), OPNET, Ptolemy-II