1AC 1NC

1AR 2NR

2AR 2NR 2AR

Judge Comments

1AC 1NC

Asian in the pursuit of the American Dream

yellow collar can never be white

stance against oppression

ignores the existence of asian oppression

chang

did not serve a single day in jail

panasian identityall asians are the same to whiteswar against an asian bodytopic is starting point

yomata

didn't know asians felt oppressed

debate space is often excluding asian bodymodel minority

chance for me to expose this racismjn is a means to say it exists

myth becomes a tool for oppression parametrisizing means he excludes other stuff

chang 2portrayal of asian as model minority

deny present day discrim

leads to other oppressionprimary

drewcow

jews link to the model minority; at worst our speech acts are on an equal level

chinese oppression/murer w/o going together; topics open to asians bc of this

never stand in solidarity if we assume a policy that helps some but harms others

hardpressed to explain why we can't emphasize with asians

rooting out silenced oppression aroun dour

this means we need to just deconstruct

protrayal as successful ; ignore or marginalize them as successful

we link into ableism in his analytic; certain/significiant number of regulations that exclude disabled bodies

tells a story about our society; poverty of latinos must be explained by the lack of work eithic by them

rob = structural oppression alliteration strategy 1. specificity outweigh

trying to solve for specific stuff

spanos

can still link more than a gamecocheck

db8 becomes beyond winning or losing

solution is deconstruction the myth

ojima 07 wont' solve, just a mindshift change

clarification of how we move in the world we need to do something further than that

world that is dynamically in the amking

work against other oppression

cause more bias

osijima 2

easier to see how broader forces shaped livesindividualism in america

mcdonald and german

narratives provide knowledgestats and facts become less apparent

internal link to fairnessstance against skew against asian

kwann debate is unfarresearch disparitieshostilities towards colour

debate is a site; operation of education that empowers us; school employes hegemonic discourse and reproduces order

under his role of the ballot my offense still functions

engage in an entire point of having a debate in the first place

instead of learning to operate we learn how to make the world----contienziation

turn/implicit racism against the asian population, he never solves

conversations and talk abot experience is important

narrative are good but topical narratives are better

alcove

brinkly 98 see policying makng args

separates debater from real world

im not linking in binaries; the ableism terms are fluid

dominant discourse precludes understanding how racism operates

roleplaying as policymakers upholds spectator mentality

debate round has no real impact on

1AR 2NR

asians seen as working so oppressed

nobody understands what it is

extend yomata--conceding it doesn't exist anyways

shouldn't disregard the fact oppression still happens in the system we have to talk about it

T f(x) as a disad and a turnturns on the aff is a reason we look to NC

extend this argument

you don't care about it; you don't care about it in the debate space; net harm to advocacy

role of the ballot means we have to have oppression as a whole; specificity allows us to consruct a coherent strategy; abstraction to get out of an issue; must debate policy; real world change means we need a specific group to actually liberate

why are jews par to fit? No warrant for this; jews can link to think ; net worse to this sovlency

if he wants me to go through articles after the round then jews can go through it; my performance is going to be equally as good as his; one fo the perspectives; only wy we can forward this movement

extend ojima --it's not a mindset shift its about how we can add perspetives through evidence and narratives in debate

we need real policy action; mindset change doesn't solve for everything

we are remaking the world; always better than your solvencybest solution in america because america refuses to look at it like this, it allows us to know the experience of other people; best way to solve

extend that there's implicit bias coming out of the system; he can never solve on the post-fiat layer

speech act are the same; who has the best post-fiat advocacy

anti-oppression strategies is key to solving problems of oppression

extensions of kwanna nd birnkley ?

2AR 2NR 2AR

extending narrative

yomoata, nobody understands asian oppressionsmy narrative is the only way we can introduce this perspectivejewish as model minority doesn't have a performance on this

you concede why his role of the ballot is about oppress as a whole; you excluding asian oppression is bad

solving for all bodies that's the drewcow evidence; why can't you be like these asian americans

narratives are key; instead of talking about facts and statistics, we are talking about what actually helps us, advantages of solvencywe don’t' talk about group activities, america only talks about individualismlook at this experience and see how it comes together with this experience; firs tplace we are going to solve them

Judge Comments

1NC 1AR

a link

defends cjs

ableism you vote off of my speech act as a whole

uscourts res is a starting point for my discussionindividual must not be disqualifiedexplicitly ableist vote for me for my performance, not jn

outweighs on abstraction

no attempt to include those

us2help smake sure that there's no affiliations

cedarsmedical purposes; ohters nee dhelponly way to be inclusivesocial inclusion is logically requisitediscussing people of different views

supercharged--taking a break and reviewing it

cedars 2higher education doesn't recognizeworld seems differentchange starts in the classroom

slippery slope

nannsocial stigmasdiscrimination hurts housing and jobs

alt - community oriented justice

fammused instead of prison or jailget rid of the CJs all together

debate is a speech acttied ot our bodiessupercharged by the fact that importanc is importancedoesn't solve for a liberation strategy

clearlyaustin texasneighbors and advise committee

rob = challenge ableism entire warrant is why oppression itself is badnot about abelism

beckett

I contextualize what affirming the res means in the first

systemic disability in pedagogy

should be part of a curiculumlegitimizing disabiling ideas otherwise

this is bad for debate because you aren't talking about it; he creates oppression olympics; you are just going backt ot he silence; you don't care about the silence

all warrants are way ableism is bad; if aa opp is bad you vote there

2NR

2AR 2NR 2AR

Judge Comments

1NC 1AR

1. no abuse--I disclosed an hour before the round

he just doesn't wanna engagehe was a bad method

kills lib potentialadvocacy is not topical; it’s a perforamnce

no where else to reveal the truth

2. no post-fiat null good cardstandards nowhere else we can have it

a. can't egnage in the aff

topical version of the aff could be cJs w/ model minority

could be a way he could've engaged in the topic

link fairness; can't engage

general consensus

topical version of the aff

k2 role of the judge

turns role of the ballot bc excludes me

disad to the methodim not reading fairness or educatiothis is a way I can't engage on the issueat the point in which his aff is non topical I can't engagethis is the only argument I could've else readexcludes stock ground

a. interp -- aff must be topical; must be predicated on facing perceived justice

b. using jury nullification being bad for him; not sufficient to be topical; its not part of the resolution

I have nowhere else to do this; debate is a space wher eyou have to answer to this shit

3. he says the implication is a disad to the aff so as long as aff wins solvency you vote aff

2NR

T outweighs because on high level

overview to the round--

could've engaged under the role of the ballot

kick the k it was conditional

the fact my interp says you must be topical and all offense must be on this solves it; he could've read a topical ac is a reaosn why his responses are predicated on the fairness or education; im only linking my standards into the rob; disad to the peformancehow laws could be unjustly applied to Asian Americans; so many laws/ there is a lot of lit on it; vote me up because im engaging in it

extend the violation--he reads one card but my advocacy says all offense must be predicated on it

debate space is good but you can do it through a topical ilnk; I only have an hour before the round; no wifi; would'n't have been enough to engage on the issue; should've read it for asian americans

not doing any work on line by line; engage in a topical version of the aff

extend that it impacts uner the rob so it’s a turn to the role of the ballot; if I can't engage or solve for it; there's a reason why his aff is going to be bad

destroys liegitimacy but a topical version is what should be read; undermines legitimacy of the movement; performances is terminal defense

t is a disad; risk of offense; advocacy is bad; read turns back to the role of the ballot means it solves

doing a lot of grandstanding but conceding internal warrant that only a topical version of this aff solves for abuse

2AR 2NR 2AR

not doing enough work on the prefiat layer

extend disclosure solve; he had lte; he also had his coach helping him; how jewish people were a part of the model minority

you are telling em to talk about; there's no topical advocacy; I looked for it' asian americans are not seen as oppressed, which is why people don’t' look at it; why lit exists for race

ht eproblem is implication fo T is disad but that's problematic because he's providing another solution on a prefiat layer

Judge Comments

1NC 1AR

2NR

2AR 2NR 2AR

Judge Comments

1NC 1AR

2NR

2AR 2NR 2AR

Judge Comments

1NC 1AR

2NR

2AR 2NR 2AR

Judge Comments

1AC 1NC

the only macros you need to know are:

ctrl + n = shift all cells down one

AFF ARGUMENT IS MADE HERE 1

2

3

when this opens, you may need to enable the macros

ctrl + j = make responses to an argument. To make additional responses, move down one cell. (demonstrated below)

click this cell and click "ctrl + J" so that a "1" appears in the column to the rightpush enter, and then push "ctrl + J" so that a "2" appearscontinuing pushing enter and then pushing "ctrl + J" for as many responses as are made

I guarantee that anyone with basic motor skills and reasoning skills can master this

1AR 2NR

2AR 2NR 2AR

Judge Comments

1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR

2NR 2AR Judge Comments

1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR

2NR 2AR Judge Comments

1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR

2NR 2AR Judge Comments

1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR

2NR 2AR Judge Comments

2NR 2AR Judge Comments