Mockito

35
copyright 2008 trainologic LTD Unit testing in a real-life environment using Mockito Stubbing and Mocking

Transcript of Mockito

Page 1: Mockito

copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

Unit testing in a real-life environment using Mockito

Stubbing and Mocking

Page 2: Mockito

copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

Stubbing and Mocking

• Mediator Objects and Testing

• Stubs

• Mocking Objects

• Mockito

• PowerMockito

Page 3: Mockito

3copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•The JUnit testing framework, makes the testing of an independent, non-void method, simple.

•But... how do we test an method with no return value?

•How do we test a method that interacts with other domain objects?

Testing Mediator Objects

3

Mediator Objects & Testing

Page 4: Mockito

4copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

Mediator Objects & Testing

•Dependencies – In order for a function to run it often requires Files, DB, JNDI or generally – other units

•Side effects – As a function runs we are often interested in data written to files, saved to db or generally – passed to other units

How can we test a single unit, without being affected by other units – their errors, set-up

complexities and performance issues?

In Real-Life Units are NOT Totally Self Contained

4

Page 5: Mockito

5copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

• Let’s say we want to test a method that gets an Account and a Financial Transaction, checks whether the Transaction is legitimate and only if it is, applies it to the Account.

•How would you implement this test?

Testing Mediator Objects

5

Mediator Objects & Testing

Page 6: Mockito

6copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•What if the method receives an Account and prints specific parts of it using a Logger?

Testing Mediator Objects

6

Mediator Objects & Testing

Page 7: Mockito

7copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•Many business objects that are really important to test are mediators, i.e., they contain methods which interact with other domain objects.

•Since in unit testing we want to test a unit without its dependencies, we will have to eliminate them somehow.

•We do this by passing dummy objects to “fill in” for the real dependencies.

Testing Mediator Objects

7

Mediator Objects & Testing

Page 8: Mockito

copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

Stubbing and Mocking

• Mediator Objects and Testing

• Stubs

• Mocking Objects

• Mockito

• PowerMockito

Page 9: Mockito

9copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•A Stub is a test-only object which:

• Implements the same interface as the production object

•Gives the set of services used by the tested unit – often using a naïve, hard-coded implementation

•More complex stubs may even contain test-supporting logic, e.g. assert that they are used correctly

What is a Stub?

9

Stubs

Page 10: Mockito

copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•BookInventory is a package for management of … book inventories.

• It does inventory management, connection to book catalogs (like library of congress), etc.

Exercise 1- BookInventory

Stubs

Page 11: Mockito

11 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•Main Classes

Exercise 1- BookInventory

11

Stubs

1111

BookInventory

Main entry point

BookCatalog

Get title data

Amazon

Get title data

LibraryOfCongress

Get title data

ChristianCatalog

Get title data

BookCopy

Main entry point*

Page 12: Mockito

12 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•Write a unit test for BookInventory.registerCopy

•A “good” copy can be registered

•Several copies can be registered for both same and different titles

•A copy can only be registered if the title details are known

•Same copy cannot be registered twice

•Same copy id for two different titles gives specific error message

Exercise 1- BookInventory

12

Stubs

Page 13: Mockito

13 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•Pros:

•We can write anything

•Cons:

•A lot of work

•Error prone

•Gets complicated as our demands increase:

• Was the catalog actually called?

• Was it called more than once?

• Was the isbn passed correctly to the catalog?

• What if two catalogs return different results?

Stubbing Pros and Cons

13

Stubs

Page 14: Mockito

copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

Stubbing and Mocking

• Mediator Objects and Testing

• Stubs

• Mocking Objects

• Mockito

• PowerMockito

Page 15: Mockito

15 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•A Mock object is an object that:

• Is created by the mock framework

• Implements the same interface as the original dependent object. Otherwise, the compiler won’t let us pass it to the tested object.

•Supplies the tested code with everything it expects from the dependent object.

•Allows us to check that the tested code is using the dependent object (the Mock) correctly.

Mock Objects

15

Mocks

Page 16: Mockito

16 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•To use a Mock object we should:

• Create instance of the Mock.

• Define bahavior during test.

• Invoke the tested code while passing the Mock as parameter.

• Verify the Mock has been used correctly.

• Let’s see an example...

Introduction to Mock Objects

16

Mocks

Page 17: Mockito

17 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD17

Mocks

Example: Testing book addition with Mock Title Catalog

Construct

Set behavior

Verify behavior

Page 18: Mockito

18 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•Setup mocks for all dependencies required by our units – Either as part of setUp (@Before) or at the beginning of the test method

•Set mocks to correctly handle interaction – Usually at the beginning of the test method

•Call business logic under testing

•Verify results & behavior (i.e. “side effects”)

The Typical Usage Pattern

18

Mocks

Page 19: Mockito

19 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•When we set expectations on unit behavior, we are also setting restrictions on how it is implemented

• It is very easy to create tests that are implementation specific, and will break even though the unit is OK

•Such tests are called “brittle” and they are nightmare to maintain

The danger of testing behavior through mocks

19

Mocks

Page 20: Mockito

20 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•Testing the SQL passed to the DB

•Verifying that the unit actually pulls data given by mocks

•Testing for a specific order of calls to mocks

•Etc.

Some Examples of Brittle tests

20

Mocks

Over-Specified behavior == Brittle tests

Page 21: Mockito

copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

Stubbing and Mocking

• Mediator Objects and Testing

• Stubs

• Mocking Objects

• Mockito

• PowerMockito

Page 22: Mockito

22 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

Mockito

22

•An open-source project providing an easy way to work with Mock objects.

•Can be freely downloaded from Google Code http://code.google.com/p/mockito.

•Released under the MIT License.

Mockito

Page 23: Mockito

23 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•No need to write Mock objects by hand.

•Simple “Set-Run-Verify” work model (as opposed to (expect/record-run-verify)

•Refactoring-safe, no need to refactor Mock in case the interface has changed.

•Supports return values and Exceptions.

• Flexible parameter handling in both set & verify

•Single jar, easy setup

•Easy to learn

Mockito - Benefits

23

Mockito

Page 24: Mockito

24 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

• Import Mockito – preferably static:

import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;

•Option 1: “mock” instead of “new” IAccount mockAct= mock(IAccount.class);// or even… Account mockAct= mock(Account.class); //on a concrete class

•Option 2: @mock a member @mock private Account mockAct; (But then you need to use MockitoAnnotations.initMocks or JUnitMockitoRunner)

Constructing Mocks

24

Mockito

Page 25: Mockito

25 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

• Examples:

when(mockedList.get(0)).thenReturn("first");

when(mockedList.get(or(eq(1), eq(2)))). thenReturn(“more");

when(mockedList.get(gt(2)).thenThrow(new RuntimeException());

• Other Matchers:

• anyInt, anyString,…

• Custom matchers using hamcrest

Setting up Mock Behavior

25

Mockito

Page 26: Mockito

26 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•Verify a function was called:

verify(mockedList).clear();

•Verify parameters passed:verify(mockedList).add("one");

verify(mockedList).add(anyString());

•Verify number of invocations:verify(mockedList,atLeastOnce()).add("one");

verify(mockedList,times(3)).add(anyString());

similarly: never, atLeast, atMost

•CAUTION: This is the heart of brittle testing!

Verifying Behavior

26

Mockito

Page 27: Mockito

27 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•Using Mockito:

•Rewrite the tests from Exercise 1

•Also test that:

•BookInventory.registerCopy:

•Works well with several TitleCatalog objects

•Stops searching for book details once it has them

•Extend BookInventory to support TitleCatalogs of banned books. Test it.

(A copy of a banned book cannot be registered)

Exercise 2

27

Mockito

Page 28: Mockito

28 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

• Spy allows us to wrap a real object, and perform partial mocking

• This is dangerous,but may be relevantwith some legacy code.

Partial Mocking: Spy Objects

28

Mockito

Page 29: Mockito

29 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•Mockito allows you to verify the order in which methods on mocks were called.

•This is yet another example of how you can create extremely brittle tests. Use with caution.

Verifying call order

29

Mockito

Page 30: Mockito

30 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

•You can make sure a mock was not used through

verifyZeroInteractions

•You can make sure a mock was not used following a specific verify through verifyNoMoreInteractions

•Both are often over specification…

Expecting Nothing is Expecting Something

30

Mockito

Page 31: Mockito

copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

Stubbing and Mocking

• Mediator Objects and Testing

• Stubs

• Mocking Objects

• Mockito

• PowerMockito

Page 32: Mockito

32 copyright 2009 Trainologic LTD

•PowerMock is a framework that extends Mockito/EasyMock. For Mockito it is called PowerMockito.

•PowerMock uses a custom classloader and bytecode manipulation to enable mocking of static methods, constructors, final classes and methods, private methods, and more.

•This is a mixed blessing:

•We can avoid re-factoring legacy code in order to test it

•We are less inclined to fix bad design

PowerMock

32

EasyMock

Page 33: Mockito

33 copyright 2009 Trainologic LTD

• Lets see an example:

•We have the following class:

PowerMockito Example

33

EasyMock

Page 34: Mockito

34 copyright 2009 Trainologic LTD

PowerMock Example

34

EasyMock

Page 35: Mockito

35 copyright 2008 trainologic LTD

EasyMock

• In order to unit-test isolated units we must use Mock objects.

•Writing Mocks by hand is cumbersome.

•Mockito is a simple and easy to use library that helps us create Mock implementations on the fly.

How do you know if a person really does unit testing?Ask him what mocking framework he is using!

Summary

35