Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

11

Click here to load reader

description

We saved the best for last. In this unique panel, lawyers and e-discovery experts presented with a real-world fact pattern argue for and against cost-shifting before a top Santa Clara Court judge. The session will probe: • Appropriate use of case management strategies, • Proportionality, • The applicability of Daubert to predictive coding, and • Judicial consideration for allocating e-discovery costs. These 60 minutes are worth the price of admission.

Transcript of Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Page 1: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Friday, Oct. 11 | 11 – Noon

Page 2: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Lael Andara

IP Litigation Partner | Ropers Majeski Kohn Bentley

Page 3: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Robert Brownstone

E-Discovery Counsel & Co-Chair, Electronic Information Management

| Fenwick & West

Page 4: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Hon. Socrates Manoukian

Judge | Santa Clara County Superior Court

Page 5: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

J. William Speros

Evidence Consulting Attorney | Speros & Associates

Page 6: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Hypothetical• Defendant BrainBooster Corp. (Robert Brownstone): Sells NZT-13 advertised as containing “natural active ingredients” and to “enable people to learn more quickly and to exhibit better recall”• Class Action Plaintiffs Sean Senseless, et al. (Lael Andara): False advertising, products liability (potentially leading to loss of smell, taste, hearing and sight)

Page 7: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Hypothetical

• Motion for protective order (before Judge Socrates Manoukian) re e-mails:– Costs re restoring back-ups and reviewing e-mails– Whether/ how to employ Technology Assisted Review

• Judge’s neutral expert (Bill Speros)

Page 8: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Caveat

Ideas expressed here are intended to be informative, sometimes using hyperbole.

Consequently, these ideas do not necessarily reflect

our own opinions or experiences or those of our court, employers or clients.

Page 9: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Your Notes

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 10: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Your Notes

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 11: Mock Hearing: The Great E-Discovery Cost-Shifting Debate

Your Notes

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________