MN30380 - Financial Marketspeople.bath.ac.uk/mnsrf/MN30380/Lecture 01.pdf · MN30380 - Financial...

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

MN30380 - Financial Markets

Andreas Krause

Lecture 1 - Utility Theory

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Password

JCH140LD9GBX

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Structure of this lecture

1 Utility axioms

2 Expected utility

3 Risk aversion

4 Classes of utility functionsCARA utility functionsCRRA utility functionHARA utility functions

5 Outlook

Readings: Handout, Chapter 1

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

1 Utility axioms

2 Expected utility

3 Risk aversion

5 Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Preferences

Preferences allow to order any possible choices, i.e. rankthem

In economics a set of axioms have been developed thatachieve this aim

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Preferences

Preferences allow to order any possible choices, i.e. rankthem

In economics a set of axioms have been developed thatachieve this aim

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Axiom 1 (Reflection)

Any choice is at least as good as itself

a � a

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Axiom 1 (Reflection)

Any choice is at least as good as itself

a � a

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Axiom 2 (Transitivity)

If a � b and b � c , then a � c

In experiments, transitivity of choices has been found tobe frequently violated

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Axiom 2 (Transitivity)

If a � b and b � c , then a � c

In experiments, transitivity of choices has been found tobe frequently violated

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Axiom 3 (Completeness)

All choices can be compared

∀a, b : a � b or b � a

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

∀a, b : a � b or b � a

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Utility function

A utility function U : S → R assigns a real number toeach choice such that

a � b ⇔ U(a) > U(b)

a ∼ b ⇔ U(a) = U(b)

The absolute value of these numbers is irrelevant, they canalso be negative

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Utility function

a � b ⇔ U(a) > U(b)a ∼ b ⇔ U(a) = U(b)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Utility function

a � b ⇔ U(a) > U(b)a ∼ b ⇔ U(a) = U(b)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Utility function

a � b ⇔ U(a) > U(b)a ∼ b ⇔ U(a) = U(b)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

1 Utility axioms

2 Expected utility

3 Risk aversion

5 Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

The problem

When outcomes are uncertain, the simple utility axioms donot hold any more

We can compare individual possible outcomes, but how toaggregate them?

A set of axioms has been developed to deal with thisproblem

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

The problem

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

The problem

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Notation

A choice ai has a set of potential outcomes{ci1, ci2, . . . , ciM}These outcomes corresponds to the different states ofassets

Each outcome (state) has a certain probability ofoccurring, pij

A choice we also write as ai = [pi1ci1, . . . , piMciM ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Notation

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Notation

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Notation

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

∀ai , aj : ai � aj or aj � ai

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

∀ai , aj : ai � aj or aj � ai

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Axiom 2 (Decomposition)

Let ai = [pi1bi1, . . . , piMbiM ] with bij = [qij1c1, . . . , qijLbL]

If we define p∗ik =∑M

l=1 pilqilk then ai ∼ [p∗i1c1, . . . , p∗iLcL]

If the possible outcomes of a choice are themselvesrandom, we can generate an equivalent choice based onlyon final payoffs

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Axiom 3 (Composition)

Let ai = [pi1bi1, . . . , piMbiM ] and bij ∼ [qij1c1, . . . , qijLbL]

Then ai ∼ [p∗i1c1, . . . , pij [qij1c1, . . . , qijLbL] , . . . , p∗iLcL]

We can generate more complex outcomes, but they do notaffect the preferences

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Axiom 4 (Monotonicity)

Let ai = [pi1c1, pi2c2] and bi = [qi1c1, qi2c2] with c1 � c2

If pi1 > qi1 then ai � bi

Given the same possible payoffs, the choice with thehigher probability on the better payoff is preferred

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Axiom 5 (Continuity)

If ai � bi and bi � ci then there exists a di = [p1ai , p2ci ]such that di ∼ bi

This axiom ensures that we always can generateintermediate outcomes from its extremes.

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Axiom 5 (Continuity)

If ai � bi and bi � ci then there exists a di = [p1ai , p2ci ]such that di ∼ bi

This axiom ensures that we always can generateintermediate outcomes from its extremes.

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

The proof

Let ai = [pi1ci1, . . . , piMciM ] with c1 � c2 � . . . � cM

Such an order exists by axiom 1

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

The proof

Let ai = [pi1ci1, . . . , piMciM ] with c1 � c2 � . . . � cM

Such an order exists by axiom 1

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Using the extreme outcomes

We can rewrite ci as ci ∼ [uic1, (1− ui )cM ] ≡ c∗iThis uses axiom 5

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Using the extreme outcomes

We can rewrite ci as ci ∼ [uic1, (1− ui )cM ] ≡ c∗iThis uses axiom 5

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Substitute in the choice

ai = [pi1c∗1 , . . . , piMc∗M ]

This uses axiom 3 and replaces the outcomes withstochastic outcomes

Each c∗i consists of the same two possible outcomes, c1

and cM , only with different probabilities

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

ai = [pi1c∗1 , . . . , piMc∗M ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

ai = [pi1c∗1 , . . . , piMc∗M ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Simplifying the outcomes

ai ∼ [pic1, (1− pi )cM ]

pi =∑M

j=1 uijpij

pi = E [ui ]

The choice has been reduced to two possible outcomes

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

ai ∼ [pic1, (1− pi )cM ]

pi =∑M

j=1 uijpij

pi = E [ui ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

ai ∼ [pic1, (1− pi )cM ]

pi =∑M

j=1 uijpij

pi = E [ui ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

ai ∼ [pic1, (1− pi )cM ]

pi =∑M

j=1 uijpij

pi = E [ui ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Comparing outcomes

For another choice we get equivalentlyaj ∼ [pjc1, (1− pj)cM ] with pi = E [ui ]

If pi > pj we find ai � aj using axiom 4

Or E [ui ] > E [uj ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Comparing outcomes

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Comparing outcomes

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Interpreting ui

From our definition we know from axiom 4 thatci � cj ⇔ ui > uj

The ordering of ui therefore reflects the order if thepreferences

This is exactly the same as the definition of the utilityfunction

ui can be interpreted as utility

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Interpreting ui

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Interpreting ui

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Interpreting ui

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Expected utility principle

Choices should be made according to the expected utilityof the choices

ai � aj ⇔ E [U(ai )] > E [U(aj)]

Determine the utility of each possible outcome and thencalculate the expected value

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

ai � aj ⇔ E [U(ai )] > E [U(aj)]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

ai � aj ⇔ E [U(ai )] > E [U(aj)]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

1 Utility axioms

2 Expected utility

3 Risk aversion

5 Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Definition

Individuals are risk averse if they always prefer to receive afixed payment to a random payment of equal expected value.

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Certainty equivalent

In order to be indifferent between a fixed and randompayment, the fixed payment must be lower by an amountof π

E [U(x)] = E [U (E [x ]− π)] = U(E [x ]− π)

E [x ]− π is called the cash equivalent or certaintyequivalent of x

π is called the risk premium of x

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

E [U(x)] = E [U (E [x ]− π)] = U(E [x ]− π)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

E [U(x)] = E [U (E [x ]− π)] = U(E [x ]− π)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

E [U(x)] = E [U (E [x ]− π)] = U(E [x ]− π)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Approximating the random payoff

Using a 2nd order Taylor series expansion around E [x ] weget

E [U(x)] = E [U(E [x ]) + U ′(E [x ])(x − E [x ])+1

2U ′′(E [x ])(x − E [x ])2]

= U(E [x ]) + 12U ′′(E [x ])Var [x ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

E [U(x)] = E [U(E [x ]) + U ′(E [x ])(x − E [x ])+1

2U ′′(E [x ])(x − E [x ])2]

= U(E [x ]) + 12U ′′(E [x ])Var [x ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

E [U(x)] = E [U(E [x ]) + U ′(E [x ])(x − E [x ])+1

2U ′′(E [x ])(x − E [x ])2]

= U(E [x ]) + 12U ′′(E [x ])Var [x ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

E [U(x)] = E [U(E [x ]) + U ′(E [x ])(x − E [x ])+1

2U ′′(E [x ])(x − E [x ])2]

= U(E [x ]) + 12U ′′(E [x ])Var [x ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Approximating the fixed payoff

Using a 1st order Taylor series expansion around E [x ] weget

U(E [x ]− π) = U(E [x ]) + U ′(E [x ])π

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Approximating the fixed payoff

Using a 1st order Taylor series expansion around E [x ] weget

U(E [x ]− π) = U(E [x ]) + U ′(E [x ])π

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Risk premium

Combining the two equations we get

π = 12

(−U′′(E [x])

U′(E [x])

)Var [x ]

z = −U′′(E [x])U′(E [x]) is known as the absolute risk aversion

The more concave the utility function is, the more riskaverse the individual

The relative risk aversion is defined as zV

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Risk premium

π = 12

(−U′′(E [x])

U′(E [x])

)Var [x ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Risk premium

π = 12

(−U′′(E [x])

U′(E [x])

)Var [x ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Risk premium

π = 12

(−U′′(E [x])

U′(E [x])

)Var [x ]

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Risk aversion and expected utility

��

x1 x2E [x]E [x]− π

π�-

U(E [x])

E [U(x)] =U(E [x]− π)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

1 Utility axioms

2 Expected utility

3 Risk aversion

5 Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

The idea

Relative utility level should depend only on the differenceof wealth associated with two choicesU(V )U(V ′) = f (V − V ′)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

The idea

Relative utility level should depend only on the differenceof wealth associated with two choicesU(V )U(V ′) = f (V − V ′)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Deriving the utility function

U′(V )U(V ′) = f ′(V − V ′)

U′(V ′)U(V ′) = f ′(0) ≡ −z

[ln U(V ′)]′ = −z

ln U(V ′) = −zV ′ + c

U(V ) = Ce−zV = −e−zV

Set C = −1 to ensure U ′(V ) ≥ 0

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

U′(V )U(V ′) = f ′(V − V ′)

U′(V ′)U(V ′) = f ′(0) ≡ −z

[ln U(V ′)]′ = −z

ln U(V ′) = −zV ′ + c

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

U′(V )U(V ′) = f ′(V − V ′)

U′(V ′)U(V ′) = f ′(0) ≡ −z

[ln U(V ′)]′ = −z

ln U(V ′) = −zV ′ + c

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

U′(V )U(V ′) = f ′(V − V ′)

U′(V ′)U(V ′) = f ′(0) ≡ −z

[ln U(V ′)]′ = −z

ln U(V ′) = −zV ′ + c

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

U′(V )U(V ′) = f ′(V − V ′)

U′(V ′)U(V ′) = f ′(0) ≡ −z

[ln U(V ′)]′ = −z

ln U(V ′) = −zV ′ + c

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

U′(V )U(V ′) = f ′(V − V ′)

U′(V ′)U(V ′) = f ′(0) ≡ −z

[ln U(V ′)]′ = −z

ln U(V ′) = −zV ′ + c

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Risk aversion

Using U(V ) = −e−zV we can show that −U′′(V )U′(V ) = z

Hence the utility function has Constant Absolute RiskAversion

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Risk aversion

Using U(V ) = −e−zV we can show that −U′′(V )U′(V ) = z

Hence the utility function has Constant Absolute RiskAversion

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

The idea

Relative utility levels of two choices depend on the relativechange in wealth the choices produceU(V )U(V ′) = f

(VV ′

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

The idea

Relative utility levels of two choices depend on the relativechange in wealth the choices produceU(V )U(V ′) = f

(VV ′

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

U(V )U(V ′) = U(exp(ln V ))

U(exp(ln V ′)) = U(ln V )

U(ln V ′)

VV ′

))= f (ln V − ln V ′)

Log-levels of wealth follow a CARA utility function

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

U(ln V ′)

VV ′

))= f (ln V − ln V ′)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

U(ln V ′)

VV ′

))= f (ln V − ln V ′)

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Deriving the utility function (ctd.)

U(ln V ) = U(V ) = Ce−z ln V = CV−z =V−z

z = U′′(V )U′(V ) = (z+1)

V or z = zV − 1

More commonly written with γ = z + 1 as U(V ) = V 1−γ

1−γ

Hence γ = zV which is the relative risk aversion

Utility function has Constant Relative Risk Aversion

for γ = 1 (z = 0) this becomes U(V ) = ln V

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

z = U′′(V )U′(V ) = (z+1)

V or z = zV − 1

1−γ

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

z = U′′(V )U′(V ) = (z+1)

V or z = zV − 1

1−γ

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

z = U′′(V )U′(V ) = (z+1)

V or z = zV − 1

1−γ

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

z = U′′(V )U′(V ) = (z+1)

V or z = zV − 1

1−γ

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

z = U′′(V )U′(V ) = (z+1)

V or z = zV − 1

1−γ

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Definition

CARA and CRRA utility functions are special cases of theHyperbolic Absolute Risk Aversion utility function

U(V ) = (V+V0)1−γ

1−γ

Relative risk aversion isγ = −U′′(V )

U′(V ) V = γ VV+V0

1 + V0V

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Definition

U(V ) = (V+V0)1−γ

1−γ

U′(V ) V = γ VV+V0

1 + V0V

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Definition

U(V ) = (V+V0)1−γ

1−γ

U′(V ) V = γ VV+V0

1 + V0V

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Properties

If V0 = 0 we have γ = γ and HARA collapses to CARA

If we set γ = +∞ and γ = z HARA becomes a CARAutility function

γ is called the local risk aversion at a risk free investmentof V

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Properties

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Properties

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

Different representation

Solving for V0 we get V0 = V(

γγ − 1

)U(V ) = V 1−γ

1−γ

)1−γ

γ > γ

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

γγ − 1

)U(V ) = V 1−γ

1−γ

)1−γ

γ > γ

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

γγ − 1

)U(V ) = V 1−γ

1−γ

)1−γ

γ > γ

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

1 Utility axioms

2 Expected utility

3 Risk aversion

5 Outlook

FinancialMarkets

Lecture 1

Utility axioms

Expectedutility

Risk aversion

Utilityfunctions

Outlook

We will use utility functions widely to determine the optimalportfolio as of the coming lecture.

MN30380 - Financial Marketspeople.bath.ac.uk/mnsrf/MN30380/Lecture 01.pdf · MN30380 - Financial...

Documents

Transcript of MN30380 - Financial Marketspeople.bath.ac.uk/mnsrf/MN30380/Lecture 01.pdf · MN30380 - Financial...