Mit n 9 Action Items Update

download Mit n 9 Action Items Update

of 22

description

MIT 9

Transcript of Mit n 9 Action Items Update

  • AW139 Maintenance Improvement

    Team

    MEETING # 9 ACTION ITEMS UPDATE

    Philadelphia, 04th - 05th December 2014

  • 2

    Summary

    MIT meeting history

    9th MIT AW proposed action items status

    High priority action items status

  • 3

    Summary

    MIT meeting history

    9th MIT AW proposed action items status

    High priority action items status

  • 4

    MIT meeting history (1/4)

    Meeting

    number

    Date and

    Location

    New action

    item

    Total action

    item

    Action items status (number and %)

    Closed In progress Open

    1 25-27 May 2011

    AW Cascina C. 62 0

    2 17-18 Nov 2011

    AW Philadelphia 30 62 25 40% 12 20% 25 40%

    3 11 Feb 2012

    HAI Dallas 8 92 40 43,5% 11 12% 41 44,5%

    4 7-8 June 2012

    AW Cascina C. 13 100 58 -58% 15 15% 27 27%

    5 15-16 Jan 2013

    AW Philadelphia 27 113 67 -59,5% 32 28,5% 14 12%

    6 6-7 June 2013

    AW Cascina C. 12 140 92 65,7% 37 26,4% 11 7,9%

    7 5-6 Dec 2013

    AW Philadelphia 10 152 115 75,7% 29 19,1% 8 5,3%

    8 12-13 June 2014

    AW Cascina C. 14 162 125 77,2% 30 18,5% 7 4,3%

  • 5

    MIT meeting history (2/4)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Act

    ion

    Item

    s #

    MIT meeting event

    Total action items

    Closed #

    In progress #

    Open #

  • 6

    MIT meeting history (3/4)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Act

    ion

    Ite

    ms

    #

    MIT meeting event

    Total action items

    New action items

  • 7

    MIT meeting history (4/4)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Act

    ion

    Item

    s #

    MIT meeting event

    Closed #

    Delta closed

  • 8

    Summary

    MIT meeting history

    9th MIT AW proposed action items status

    High priority action items status

  • 9

    9th MIT AW action items status

    Meeting

    number

    Date and

    Location

    New action

    item

    Total action

    item

    Action items status (number and %)

    Closed In progress Open

    9 4-5 Dec 2014

    AW Philadelphia 176 139 79,0% 31 17,6% 6 3,4%

    79%

    17,6%

    3,4%

    AW Action Items Statistics

    CLOSED

    IN PROGRESS

    OPEN

  • 10

    Summary

    MIT meeting history

    8th MIT AW proposed action items status

    High priority action items status

  • 11

    Item M028 Time limits: tolerance extension

    Background

    Evaluate to increase AMPI Chapter 5 inspection tolerances from current 50 FH to 100 FH.

    Status

    The certification process has been formally launched according to our DOA privileges.

    All the tasks coming from SRS analyses can accept a tolerance extension. For the other inspections

    the analysis is in progress.

    The target for the completion of the activity is 3Q 2015.

    IN P

    RO

    GR

    ESS

  • 12

    Item M046 Liebherr LG task interval extension

    Background

    Evaluate to increase AMPI Chapter 5 Liebherr Landing Gear system inspection intervals from current

    300 FH or 300 FH / 1 Year to 600 FH at least.

    Analysis of AW in service reports and Liebherr technical data and repair shop records confirmed no

    critical technical issue related to the Landing Gear system to prevent inspection interval extension.

    Status

    AW and Liebherr agreed on the task interval extension from current 300 FH to 600 FH.

    Liebherr substantiation document officially signed received.

    Modification introduced with AMPI Chapter V Issue 6 Change 7.

    CLO

    SED

  • 13

    Item M060b MGB oil servicing extension

    Background

    Oil sample campaign to substantiate extension of the servicing interval from current 300 FH to 600 FH

    agreed and defined.

    Six MGBs from three different Customers (CHC, Weststar, Chevron) to be monitored at 300 FH and

    600 FH to compare oil characteristics.

    Oil collection campaign completed with CHC and Weststar; on-going with Chevron; target completion.

    Status

    Laboratory analysis confirmed oil characteristics at 300 FH and 600 FH within specification.

    Scuffing test completed on oil samples confirming no oil degradation at 600 FH compared to 300 FH

    and new oil.

    Micro pitting testing on going at external laboratory; test completion planned for end of December

    2014 with official report in January 2015; preliminary data confirming oil performances up to 600 FH.

    AMPI will be revised accordingly within 1Q 2015

    IN P

    RO

    GR

    ESS

  • 14

    Item M060c IGB/TGB servicing interval evaluation

    Background

    Based on the MGB oil campaign, AW decided to launch a sample campaign on IGB/TGB oil (without

    extension trial) to compare results from IGB/TGB samples with MGB ones; based on the results

    servicing interval extension will be evaluated (potential extension campaign will be necessary).

    Status

    Campaign to be launched according to the following requirement:

    IN P

    RO

    GR

    ESS

    IGB N

    TGB N

    Customer Oil type Environment

    Analysis type Sample qty

    2 2 Customer A Oil BP2380 A Physic-Chemical 0.5 l

    2 2 Customer B Oil BP2380 B Physic-Chemical 0.5 l

    2 2 Customer C Oil BP2380 C Physic-Chemical 0.5 l

    1 1 Customer A/D Aeroshell Turbine Oil 555 A Physic-Chemical 0.5 l

    1 1 Customer B/E Aeroshell Turbine Oil 555 B Physic-Chemical 0.5 l

  • 15

    Item M070 MR blade & damper bolts lubrication

    Background

    Some Operators, via special concession, tested different products.

    CHC confirmed that Parker Lube is effective; ERA confirmed that Marine Grease is effective; FBH

    confirmed that Loctite 8009 is effective.

    Status

    Application on MR blade and damper bolts of Loctite 8009 in addition to solid lubricant.

    Design modified with the application of Loctite 8009 in addition to solid lubricant in October 2014 and

    introduced into IETP Issue 25 (November 2014).

    Alternative materials to be tested.

    CLO

    SED

  • 16

    Item M088 AMPI Chapter IV intervals

    Background

    Evaluate the possibility to rely on numbers (non rounded to next scheduled 300/600 etc...) to gain

    tolerance/margins on AMPI Chapter IV intervals.

    Status

    Considering that a complete review of the AMPI Chapter IV intervals is not feasible, Operators

    requested to evaluate the margin on the following MI tasks: 53-07/08/09 (and eventually 53-01/05/06)

    New full scale cabin fatigue tests started at the University of Milan. The target is to demonstrate a life

    of 40,000 FH for the main cabin. Test is planned to run for all 2015. This test will be used to support

    extension of the inspection interval.

    Target inspection interval:

    Fuselage tasks (53-07/08/09 ):1200 FH;

    Tail tasks (53-01/05/06): considerable extension or removal

    EASA certification planned within 4Q 2015 based on

    EASA representative engagement.

    IN P

    RO

    GR

    ESS

  • 17

    Item R002a Lead acid batteries

    Background

    Operators requested AW feedback on the possibility to use Lead acid batteries on AW139.

    AW certified in March 2014 KIT BATT. START IN PARALLEL 27AH AND 44AH P/N 4G2430F00811 to

    further improve starting performances; this is the basic configuration to test Lead Acid batteries.

    AW confirmed availability to test lead acid batteries on a prototype helicopter in the parallel

    configuration and to share data with batteries manufacturer to support STC approval.

    Status

    Gill batteries (44 Ah + 27 Ah) received by supplier for test.

    Kit P/N 4G2430F00811 retrofitted on prototype helicopter to perform comparison between current

    NiCad batteries and Lead Acid.

    Baseline flights with NiCad configuration planned for mid December; soon after the same flights with

    Lead Acid batteries to compare configuration performances with PW&C versus the minimum starting

    torque curve requirement.

    As soon as test results will be available, they will be shared within MIT group and STC applicants.

    IN P

    RO

    GR

    ESS

  • 18

    Item R010b MRA & TRA pressure switch mod

    Background

    Customers requested BT139-105 Part III effectiveness on servo pressure switch modified installation

    (new boot and Goretex patch on switch ventilation hole).

    Goretex patch applied in production by AW on MRA but not on TRA.

    Status

    Goretex patch will be applied basic in production by Claverham on new pressure switch P/N 87137-

    81; this pressure switch is the current one with the application of the patch.

    The new pressure switch will be basic on the new MRA and TRA design to introduce the new VL-

    seals.

    According to available reports the introduction of the modified installation reduced the events of failure

    signals.

    CLO

    SED

  • 19

    Item R010c MRA & TRA pressure switch

    Background

    Customers requested a plan for the design of a new pressure switch.

    IN P

    RO

    GR

    ESS

    Status

    Claverham is qualifying a new hermetically sealed

    pressure switch P/N 87223-85 including a physical

    separation between the mechanical and the electrical

    portion of the switch.

    The Goretex patch will be applied also to the new

    switch.

    Qualification will be completed within December 2014

    with final certification within January 2015.

    New switch will become basic in production and for

    spares.

    New switch availability: April 2015

  • 20

    Item R010d MRA & TRA pressure switch

    Background

    Customers requested to evaluate an alternative supplier for the switch, proposing Benz as it is used

    on other platforms.

    Status

    Benz are not a recognised or approved supplier for UTAS and are not currently included in the UTAS

    Global Supply Chain Strategy.

    The qualification and approval process for any new supplier is extensive and far in excess of the

    activity currently being undertaken with the current supplier for the new pressure switch.

    Proposal is to monitor new sealed switch (refer to item R010c) and then evaluate with UTAS an

    alternative solution.

    CLO

    SED

  • 21

    Item R011a EPA

    Background

    Customers requested the possibility to perform automatic in flight EPA to save fuel currently necessary

    to comply with this requirement especially for Operators operating under Cat A.

    Status

    P&WC is working to certify an STC to provide EPA automatic capability (FAST).

    Hardware installation location defined.

    Launch Customer identified; installation in progress based on helicopter availability.

    PWC is looking for other Customers willing to install the STC.

    Program divided into two phases:

    Phase 1: FAA STC approval within February 2015 to install the system and start collecting as

    much data as data possible.

    Phase 2: based on the data gathered after Phase 1, software tailoring to allow EPAC in flight;

    target end of 2015

    IN P

    RO

    GR

    ESS

  • THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

    MIT # 9