Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

22
Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation Rich Williams NASA Chief Health and Medical Officer

description

Rich Williams NASA Chief Health and Medical Officer. Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation. Societal Imperatives. National Security Imperative Public Safety Imperative Human Exploration Imperative. Risk Mitigation in an Occupational Environment. Crew selection standards - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Page 1: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Mission to Mars:Health Risk Mitigation

Rich WilliamsNASA Chief Health and Medical Officer

Page 2: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Societal Imperatives

• National Security Imperative

• Public Safety Imperative

• Human Exploration Imperative

Page 3: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Risk Mitigation in an Occupational Environment

• Crew selection standards– Waivers are routine

• Engineering controls

• Exposure limits standards– In general, no waivers granted

• Personal protection, countermeasures

• Medical/environmental monitoring

Page 4: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

49,000,000 km

22 minute 1-way communication

g

g

1 yr

1 yr

temperatureextremes

Isolation &confinement

vacuum

Isolation &confinement

temperatureextremes

vacuum

Water & food

availability

Fuel & oxygen

Reduced gravity

New geo-ecosystem

Radiation

circadian

Biorhythms?

Risks: The Space Environment

Page 5: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

1

7

13

19

25

31

37

43

49

55

61

67

73

79

85

91

97

103

109

Space Flight Experience (continuous)

Space Flight Experience (continuous)

Flights longer than 28 days (May 1973 - June 2012)Flights longer than 28 days (May 1973 - June 2012)

Flight Duration (months)

Nu

mb

er

of

Ex

po

su

res

Most long-duration flights Most long-duration flights are 4-7 months longare 4-7 months long

Mars missions may last Mars missions may last up to 30 monthsup to 30 months

30

Page 6: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Time Course of Physiological ChangesTime Course of Physiological Changesin Weightlessnessin Weightlessness

Page 7: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Mars Radiation ExposureComparing Solar Max and Solar Minimun

1 Sv = ~ 100 RemPerson at Sea level ~ 1.4 Rem/yr

ISS Crew member ~ 5.4 Rem/6 monthsMars Crew member ~20-85 Rem

Page 8: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

8

Visual Impairment/Elevated Intracranial Pressure

Background: 19 known “clinical cases” of 25 evaluated crew membersEach with different degrees of symptoms

MRI Orbital Image showing globe flattening

Normal Globe Flatten Globe

•Choroidal Folds - parallel grooves in the posterior pole

•Globe Flattening

•Optic Disc Edema (swelling)

•Altered Blood flow•“cotton wool” spots

•Hyperopic Shifts-Up to +1.75 diopters

•Increased Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter

8

Page 9: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Martian Surface Analysis: Curiosity

Page 10: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Martian Dust Analysis: Curiosity

Page 11: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Seeing Earth through a telescope from Mars

Earth and Jupiter from the Martian surface

Behavioral Health

Page 12: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

NASA Health and Medical Policies

• NASA ground workforce health and safety is regulated by OSHA– Executive Order 12196, February 26, 1980, Occupational Safety and

Health Programs for Federal Employees

• NASA environmental health issues are regulated by EPA

• NASA public use vehicle operations (research aircraft, spacecraft) are controlled by NASA policy directives, procedural requirements, standards and requirements

• NASA health and medical policies and standards “regulate” aircrew and space flight crew selection, qualification, and health related requirements in NASA research aircraft and spacecraft

Page 13: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

NASA Health Standards for Human Spaceflight

• NASA STD-3001 Vol. 1: NASA Space Flight Human System Standard - Volume 1: Crew Health– 4.2.3 Fitness-for-Duty Aerobic Capacity Standard – 4.2.4 Fitness-for-Duty Sensorimotor Standard– 4.2.5 Fitness-for-Duty Behavioral Health and Cognition Standard – 4.2.6 Fitness-for-Duty Hematology and Immunology Standard – 4.2.7 Permissible Outcome Limit for Nutrition Standard – 4.2.8 Permissible Outcome Limit for Muscle Strength Standard– 4.2.9 Permissible Outcome Limit for Microgravity-Induced Bone

Mineral Loss Performance Standard (Baseline with Measured Tscore)– 4.2.10 Space Permissible Exposure Limit for Space Flight Radiation

Exposure Standard

Page 14: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Ethical Considerations of Exploration Class Missions

• Exceeding exposure limits is justified only if the benefit to the population is greater than the risk to the individual

• Examples:– Radiation workers can exceed exposure limits to contain

nuclear power plant contingencies• Generally defined in the radiation exposure standards

– Military members can exceed radiation dosage limits if driven by necessity

Page 15: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Ethical Considerations of Exploration Class Missions

• How do we approach increased health risks for exploration class missions?– Liberalize exposure limits for exploration class missions

– Waive exposure standards for exploration class missions

– Administrative risk acceptance by higher authorities

• Informed consent?• How is health risk acceptance influenced by overall

mission risk?

Page 16: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

National Academies:Institute of Medicine

• Committee on Aerospace Medicine and the Medicine of Extreme Environments (CAMMEE)– Ethics, Principles and Guidelines for Health Standards

for Long Duration and Exploration Spaceflights

Page 17: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Institute of Medicine Study

• What factors should be considered in the implementation of current health standards in exploration class missions?

• What ethical considerations are involved when exposures/risks are uncertain and exposures may exceed current standards?

• How should informed consent be applied?

• What are appropriate modifiers for standards when risks/exposures are uncertain?

• Should all crewmembers be protected to the same extent or should potential individual differences be considered?

• Are there models or examples that could inform NASA strategy?

Page 18: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation
Page 19: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

Human Health & PerformanceHHP

Component30 months Stay total Comments

Physiological Countermeasures

• 0-g transit phases well within experience base (esp. outbound)

• 3/8-g surface phase outside experience base

• Outbound similar to 6 month ISS missions

• How much will the 3/8 surface phase add to human physiologic tolerance?

• Level of Deconditioning leaving Mars and ease of rehab on mission home

Human Factors & Habitability

• Access to Surface Habitat • Atmosphere – supplies, dependability, communications

• Replacement parts

Radiation • Prolonged exposure to poorly-understood surface mixed-field (neutrons and charged particles) environment

• Solar max travel - lower cosmic radiation

• Safe haven for solar flares• Radiation protection on Mars

Behavioral Health & Performance

• Increased risk due to longer overall duration

• Family events

Medical Capabilities

• Increased risk due to longer overall duration

• Anticipation of required health care

• Preparing for the trauma and other unexpected illness

Page 20: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

NASA Policy Formulation

• Federal Government Policy– Statutes, Regulations, Executive Orders/Presidential

Directives

• NASA Agency Policy– NASA Policy Directives

– NASA Procedural Requirements

– NASA Standards

• Plans, Requirements– Programmatic (Space Shuttle, International Space Station)

• Project (External Tank, Shuttle Main Engines, etc)

– Mission Support

Page 21: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

NASA Internal Regulation

• Established by the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 “To provide for research into problems of flight within and outside the earth's atmosphere, and for other purposes.”

• 51 USC 20113(a): In the performance of its functions the Administration is authorized-- – (1) to make, promulgate, issue, rescind, and amend rules and

regulations governing the manner of its operations and the exercise of the powers vested in it by law;

• The NASA Administrator is authorized to promulgate internal NASA policies governing operations within the Agency

• Health and medical policy formulation, promulgation, and oversight is delegated to the Chief Health and Medical Officer

Page 22: Mission to Mars: Health Risk Mitigation

NASA Health Standards for Human Spaceflight

• “In this document, the Office of the Chief Health and Medical Officer establishes NASA’s space flight crew health standards for the pre-flight, in-flight, and post-flight phases of human space flight.”

• “Although the standards are applicable to the in-flight phase of all space missions, it is anticipated that they will be most relevant during long-duration lunar outpost and Mars exploration missions, since the combined ill effects of exposure to the space environment will be of most concern in those mission scenarios.”