Minimal Surfaces and H-Surfaces in Nonpositively Curved Space Forms

7
Minimal Surfaces and H-Surfaces in Nonpositively Curved Space Forms Author(s): Bennett Palmer Source: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 119, No. 1 (Sep., 1993), pp. 245-250 Published by: American Mathematical Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2159848 . Accessed: 19/12/2014 17:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . American Mathematical Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:24:01 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Transcript of Minimal Surfaces and H-Surfaces in Nonpositively Curved Space Forms

Minimal Surfaces and H-Surfaces in Nonpositively Curved Space FormsAuthor(s): Bennett PalmerSource: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 119, No. 1 (Sep., 1993), pp.245-250Published by: American Mathematical SocietyStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2159848 .

Accessed: 19/12/2014 17:24

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

American Mathematical Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access toProceedings of the American Mathematical Society.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:24:01 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 119, Number 1, September 1993

MINIMAL SURFACES AND H-SURFACES IN NONPOSITIVELY CURVED SPACE FORMS

BENNETT PALMER

(Communicated by Peter Li)

ABSTRACT. We show that if the Gauss curvature of a surface of constant mean curvature in a nonpositively curved space form is sufficiently pinched, the sur- face is stable. In this case, we also give an upper bound for the inradius. We then show that the inradius of a stable minimal surface in Euclidean space, which is contained in a solid cylinder, is bounded above by a constant depending only on the radius of the cylinder.

Let M3(c) denote a 3-dimensional oriented space form of constant sectional curvature c < 0. Let X: M -_ M3(c) be a smooth immersion of a smoothly bounded surface M with curvature K and mean curvature h. Set

K = max K, K = min K. M M

We show

Theorem I. For h, c E R with -A2 := h2+c < 0O there exist universal constants w(c, h) > e2 with the following property:

If M c M3(c) is a smooth orientable surface with constant mean curvature h and

(-A2 _ K)/(-A2 - K) < w(c, h)

then M is stable. In addition, 7.4 ... = e2 < ?((0, 0) < 10.75 ... holds.

Theorem II. If -o0 < K, K < -A2, and M contains a geodesic ball Br(xo) of radius r then

r2 < ______K)__1ge[(-A - K)/(-A2 K)].

In the second part of this paper we consider surfaces in EN which are ex- trinsically bounded in some way. Let CR = {X = (X1, X2, X3) E E3 I x2 + x2 <

R2}. We show

Theorem III. There exists a constant cl > 0 with the following property: If M c E3 is an orientable stable minimal surface with Br(p) c M and M C CRI \CR2 for some R1 > R2 > 0 then r2 < cl (R2 - R2).

Received by the editors September 11, 1991. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 53A 10.

? 1993 American Mathematical Society 0002-9939/93 $1.00 + $.25 per page

245

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:24:01 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

246 BENNETT PALMER

Before beginning the proofs, we review some basic facts about surfaces in Ml (c).

Let M -, M3 (c) be an orientable surface. Let ds2 denote the induced metric. (M, ds2) may be considered a Riemann surface in a natural way by introducing isothermal coordinates (x, y) and using z = x + iy as a com- plex coordinate. Doing so, ds2 may be expressed as ds2 = ePldzI2 and the curvature is

(1) K = -2e-Ppz2.

The second fundamental form of M has an expression

El = Re{qddz2 + hePdz dz}

where Odz2 is an invariant quadratic differential and h is the mean curvature. The fundamental equations of the immersion are those of Gauss

(2) 1bI2 = e2p(h2+ c - K)

and Codazzi

(3) = ePhz.

When h = const, (3) implies that b is holomorphic in z. It then follows that either 0 0 and M is totally umbilic or the zeros of X are isolated.

Lemma 1. Let M c M3(c), c < 0, have constant mean curvature h such that h2 + c < 0. Assume M has no umbilics. Then the conformal metric

(4) dS2 (h2 + c - K)ds2

has curvature K satisfying

(5) k> 1. Proof. Using (1)-(3) one has

(6) 0 = Alogkbl =Alog(-A2- K)1/2 +Ap

= Alog(-A2 - K)1/2 - 2K

where A = 4e-Pazaz. Therefore, using (1) to compute K one has

K = -(-A2 - K)-'{Alog(-A2 - K)1/2 - K} = (_A2 - K) K).

Since K < 0 on M, (5) follows.

Proposition 1. Again assume h = const, h2 + c =-A2 < 0 and

(7) 0 < -A2 -K < -A2 -K < -A 2- K < oo.

Then the first (nontrivial) eigenvalue AI of the problem

A+2A(-A 2 -K)V=O onM,

( 2 A=K on aM

satisfies

(8) [I log((-A2 - K)/(-A2 - K))]-j < l

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:24:01 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

MINIMAL SURFACES AND H-SURFACES 247

Proof. Let ,V > 0 be the eigenfunction corresponding to 2A . Let g(x, y) denote the positive Green's function of M. Then

/(X) = Al (-2A2 - 2K(y)) V(y)g(x, y) * 1 (y)

< 2Aj -2K(y)yi(y)g(x, y) * 1(y).

Therefore,

I V(Y)I ? <i 11 V/100 J-2K(y)g(x, y) * 1(y) -i AlIVllv(x),

where v solves

(9) Av = 2K in M, v = O on AM.

Choosing x where v achieves its maximum we arrive at

(10) 1 ? l1I~II.

By (6) and (9) A(v - log(-A2 - K)1/2) - 0 in M

and on dM v - log(-A2 - K)1/2 < - log(-A2 K)1/2.

It follows from the maximum principle and (8) that on M

( 1 ) v < log(-A2 - K) 1/2 - log(-A2 - K)1/2

< log(-A2 - K) 1/2 - log(-A2 - K)1/2.

Using this and (10), (8) follows.

Proof of Theorem I. The surface M is stationary for the functional

J = area + 2H(enclosed 3-volume).

The second variation of J for variations of the form V - N where N is the unit normal to M and q e CO (M) is given by 52J = f-VL. Here L is the selfadjoint elliptic operator LyI = AV + 2(-2A2 - K) V. Assuming the hypothesis of the theorem, we have by Proposition 1, Al >? 1. Using integration by parts we obtain

52J = J-VLV = J(IVyVI2 - 2(-2A2 - K) V2)

? J(JVVI2 - 2(-A2 - K)yV2) > 0

and M is stable.

The upper bound for wj(0, 0) follows from Example I.

Remark. We have shown that under the hypothesis of Theorem I, the second variation of J is nonnegative for all compactly supported variations. When h 54 0 this is stronger than the condition that 52J be nonnegative for all volume-preserving variations (cf. [B-DC]).

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:24:01 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

248 BENNETT PALMER

Example I. Let C C 1R3 C x R be the catenoid parameterized by X(u, v) = (ely cosh(u), u), (u, v) E IR x [0, 27r). One easily computes that the curvature is given by K = -(cosh u)-4 and that the support function is given by s = -1 + u tanh(u) .

Denote by Qt the symmetric "waist" domain of the catenoid given by ulu < t. Then Qt will be stable as long as s is negative, that is, for t < ul 1.2... For Ut

e2 > K/K = (cosh t)4

holds for t < t1 1.0850.... It follows that Theorem I has correctly predicted stability in this case. Furthermore, for Qu1 , K/K 10.75... furnishes the upper bound in the corollary. Finally the total curvature of Qt is

rti

27r cosh-2 udu 27r(1.590 ... ) > 27r. -tj

Consequently the criteria of Theorem I is independent of the Barbosa-DoCarmo result [B-DC 1].

To prove Theorem II we state without proof a special case of an eigenvalue estimate due to Gage [G].

Theorem (Gage). Let Br be a geodesic ball of radius P contained in a surface of curvature K > -fl2 = const. Then the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of the Laplacian A on Br satisfies

(12) il< 7r2/l2 + 32/4.

Proof of Theorem II. For a region Q c M let 24 (Q) denote the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of A for U. Here A is the Laplacian for the metric d9 of Lemma 1. Let AI (Q) be the first eigenvalue of the problem

(13) y/A + 2A(-A2 - K)y = 0 in Q,

V = O on aQ.

Since A = (-A2 - K)-lA, it is clear that AlI(Q) = 2A1 (Q). Let y be a mini- mizing geodesic of length P for the metric dg. Then

P J(-A2 - K)1/2 ds > (-A2 _ K)1/2 ds.

It follows that Br( A2 K)/2 C Br. By a well-known monotonicity property of eigenvalues

A I(Br(-A2-K)I1/2) > A I(Br) = 2A1 (Br)

So by Lemma 1 and Gage's Theorem with /3 = 0, we have

r2(-A2 - K) - 2Ai(Br).

Combining this with the lower bound of Proposition 1 yields the result.

We now consider surfaces in EN which are extrinsically bounded.

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:24:01 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

MINIMAL SURFACES AND H-SURFACES 249

Lemma 2. Let M C E3 be a minimal surface. Let Q c M be a smoothly bounded subdomain, and let /LI be the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of the Laplacian in Q. Assume

(14) MCCRI\CR2 R1 >R2>O.

Then

(15) 2i > 2 Il1?RR2'

1 2

Proof. Define X = (X2 +X2) . Let N = (Ni, N2, N3) be a unit normal defined on a neighborhood in M. Then

AT = 2 E (2xiAxi + 2IIVxi|j2) = jjVx1j2 + j1Vx2112 2i=1 ,2

- -N + 1 - N= 1+N? 1.

By (14) we have

(16) 2 < < 21_ Let O > 0 be a solution of AV +,ug=O with Vg O on aQ. Then

Vg(X) = p1i j Ig(y)g(x, y) * 1(y)

and consequently

qI(x)j <pil~l KIojg(xy)* 1(y).

Taking x values where V/ achieves its maximum yields

(17) <-I mAtxe Jg(x, y) * 1(y) - #I max S(x)

where S solves AS=-l inKQ,

S-O on a&. Therefore,

A(S+ T)>O in Q and S + T = T < R2/2 on aQ.

By the maximum principle

S < _ T < 1 2 in Q. - 2 - 2 2 Combining this with (17) proves (15).

Proof of Theorem III. Since M is stable, it follows by a result of Schoen [Sc, Corollary 4] that there is an estimate K(x) > -2a/r2, for all x E Br12, where a is a universal constant. Using this lower bound for K in Gage's upper bound for juI gives

a R2 4C1 U1 <4r2+ r2 = 2 2

Combining this with the lower bound for 4u1 in Lemma 2 gives the result.

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:24:01 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

250 BENNETT PALMER

Corollary. Let M C E3 be a complete minimal surface. If there exists p E M such that

(18) lim sup (-K) = 0 r--oot r B(P)

then M is not contained in a cylinder. Proof. Assume to the contrary that M c CR for some R, 0 < R < oc. Let ro be a constant with r0 > cl R2 with cl as in Theorem III. Then any disc Bro c M is unstable. By a result of Barbosa and DoCarmo [B-DC1] fB (-K) > 27r.

Taking the sequence r, = nro, one finds that since Brn(p) contains at least n disjoint geodesic balls of radius ro,

1 [~~K~ 27rn 27i (-K) >-~~= _ >> 0~ rn JB(P) nro rO

giving a contradiction.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We would like to thank Professor Robert Osserman for his helpful comments.

REFERENCES

[B-DC] J. L. Barbosa and M. DoCarmo, Stability of hypersurfaces with constant mean curvatures, Math. Z. 185 (1984), 339-353.

[B-DC 1] , On the size of a stable minimal surface in R3, Amer. J. Math. 98 (1976), 5 15-528.

[F-C-S] D. Fischer-Colbrie and R. Schoen, The structure of complete stable, minimal surfaces in 3-manifolds of non-negative scalar curvature, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 33 (1980), 199-211.

[G] M. Gage, Upper bounds for the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of the Laplace-Beltrami operators, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 29 (1980), 897-912.

[0] R. Osserman, Global properties of minimal surfaces in E3 and En , Ann. of Math. (2) 80 (1964), 340-364.

[S] M. Spivak, A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry, Vol. IV, Publish or Perish, Boston, MA, 1975.

[Sc] R. Schoen, Estimates for stable minimal surfaces in three dimensional manifolds, Seminar on Minimal Submanifolds, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983.

TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAT BERLIN, STR. DES 17 JUNI 135, 1000 BERLIN 12, GERMANY Current address: Science Laboritories, University of Durham, Durham, DH 1 -3LE, United King-

dom E-mail address: [email protected]

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:24:01 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions