Milstein TikiTokiWorkshop

3
Milstein 1 Technology in the Classroom: Using Tiki-Toki to Make Interactive Timelines Many of us are starting to consider ways of integrating technology into our assignments, like asking students to digitally annotate a text or make interactive maps of a character’s journey. In this roundtable, we will consider how technology might further our pedagogical aims, and we will look at a few specific examples of assignments for Great Works classes that use technology effectively and simply. We’ll be joined by Dana Milstein (English) and Andrew Lucchesi (Schwartz Institute). Initial Roundtable: Nov 18, 10:30 - 12 (VC14-270). Follow-up Workshop: Nov 21, 12:45 - 2 (VC7-205). Contact: [email protected]. Tentative Program I. Rationale - digital literacy skills (learning goals), Common Core Alignment - professional aims for students (career building skills) - sister applications: Timeline JS < http://timeline.knightlab.com/>, TimeGlider < http://timeglider.com/widget/index.php> , TimelineSetter < http://propublica.github.io/timeline-setter/>, PeoplePlotr <http://www.peopleplotr.com/> - rubrics II. Idea Generating Model History chart a person’s life and works, movements Law, Material Culture trace the lifespan of a movement, idea, object, event Business, Science, Psychology mark the development stages of a product or business, or experiment Political Science, Philosophy show root cause analysis through cause-effect relationships Literature, Film trace a hero’s journey, chart time progression in a non-linear text (i.e., “A Rose for Emily,” Mrs. Dalloway) or series (i.e., Proust) III. Breakout Session 1. Identify something from your course that could be presented in a timeline 2. Use notecards to come up with possible stories/categories for the timeline 3. Label as many as possible with media: images, links, videos, sound files Readings Hicks, Troy. “Crafting Presentations.” Crafting Digital Writing. Heinemann: Portsmouth, 2013. McGrail, Anne. “Tiki Toki Timelines and Women Writers Class.” August 2013. <https://blogs.lanecc.edu/dhatthecc/2013/08/23/assignment-tiki-toki-timelines-and-women- writers-class/>. National Writing Project. “Digital Texts & Common Core Standards.” November 2011. <http://digitalis.nwp.org/sites/default/files/files/391/Why%20Digital%20Writing%20Matters%2 0%E2%80%93%20According%20to%20the%20Common%20Core%20ELA%20Standards.pdf>. Reymond, Rhonda. “Timeline Assignment: Do You Tiki Toki?” August 2013. <http://arthistoryteachingresources.org/2013/08/09/timeline-assignment-do-you-tiki-toki/>.

description

faculty development

Transcript of Milstein TikiTokiWorkshop

  • Milstein 1

    Technology in the Classroom: Using Tiki-Toki to Make Interactive Timelines

    Many of us are starting to consider ways of integrating technology into our assignments, like asking students to digitally annotate a text or make interactive maps of a characters journey. In this roundtable, we will consider how technology might further our pedagogical aims, and we will look at a few specific examples of assignments for Great Works classes that use technology effectively and simply. Well be joined by Dana Milstein (English) and Andrew Lucchesi (Schwartz Institute). Initial Roundtable: Nov 18, 10:30 - 12 (VC14-270). Follow-up Workshop: Nov 21, 12:45 - 2 (VC7-205). Contact: [email protected].

    Tentative Program I. Rationale - digital literacy skills (learning goals), Common Core Alignment - professional aims for students (career building skills) - sister applications: Timeline JS < http://timeline.knightlab.com/>, TimeGlider

    < http://timeglider.com/widget/index.php> , TimelineSetter < http://propublica.github.io/timeline-setter/>, PeoplePlotr

    - rubrics

    II. Idea Generating Model History chart a persons life and works, movements Law, Material Culture trace the lifespan of a movement, idea, object,

    event Business, Science, Psychology mark the development stages of a product or

    business, or experiment Political Science, Philosophy show root cause analysis through cause-effect

    relationships Literature, Film trace a heros journey, chart time progression

    in a non-linear text (i.e., A Rose for Emily, Mrs. Dalloway) or series (i.e., Proust)

    III. Breakout Session 1. Identify something from your course that could be presented in a timeline 2. Use notecards to come up with possible stories/categories for the timeline 3. Label as many as possible with media: images, links, videos, sound files

    Readings Hicks, Troy. Crafting Presentations. Crafting Digital Writing. Heinemann: Portsmouth, 2013. McGrail, Anne. Tiki Toki Timelines and Women Writers Class. August 2013.

    . National Writing Project. Digital Texts & Common Core Standards. November 2011.

    . Reymond, Rhonda. Timeline Assignment: Do You Tiki Toki? August 2013.

    .

  • Milstein 2

    Sample Timelines 1. Student Literary Autobiography http://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/142352/Ron-Salomons-Journey-In-Literacy/#vars!date=1974-08-17_22:30:00! 2. Holocaust History Project https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1OuYBu-q0NaxPKT3TiRhVHwlu6I1IAQiKdQLh0Ax8-qg/ embed?hl=en&size=l#slide=id.g247ba14a_0_77 3. Semester-long, class-wide timeline of 20th Century Poetry and Culture http://blogs.cofc.edu/modernism/173-2/ and http://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/7471/The-Worlds-of-Modern-Poetry-A-Story-and-Timeline/#vars!date=1896-03-14_17:27:30!

    Sample Rubrics Holocaust Biography Timeline

    CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

    Preparation The student had notes about all the events and dates s/he wished to include on the timeline before beginning to design the timeline.

    The student had notes about almost all the events and dates s/he wished to include on the timeline before beginning to design the timeline.

    The student had notes about most (~75%) of the events and dates s/he wished to include on the timeline before beginning to design the timeline.

    The student had not prepared adequate notes before beginning to design the timeline.

    Content/Facts Facts were accurate for all events reported on the timeline.

    Facts were accurate for almost all events reported on the timeline.

    Facts were accurate for most (~75%) of the events reported on the timeline.

    Facts were often inaccurate for events reported on the timeline.

    Dates An accurate, complete date has been included for each event.

    An accurate, complete date has been included for almost every event.

    An accurate date has been included for almost every event.

    Dates are inaccurate and/or missing for several events.

    Events The timeline contained at least 8-10 events related to the Holocaust figure.

    The timeline contained at least 6-7 events related to the Holocaust figure.

    The timeline contained at least 5 events related to the Holocaust figure.

    The timeline contained fewer than 5 events related to the Holocaust figure.

    Spelling and Capitalization

    Spelling and capitalization were checked by another student and are correct throughout.

    Spelling and capitalization were checked by another student and were mostly correct .

    Spelling and capitalization were mostly correct, but were not checked by another student.

    There were many spelling and capitalization errors.

    Readability The overall appearance of the timeline is pleasing and easy to read.

    The overall appearance of the timeline is somewhat pleasing and easy to read.

    The timeline is relatively readable.

    The timeline is difficult to read.

  • Milstein 3

    Digital Literacy General Rubric

    Exceeding Standards

    Meeting Standards

    Approaching Standards

    Preparation (5 pts) (3.5-5 pts) Clear Purpose

    Target Audience Identified Information gathering varied

    and substantial Collaboration demonstrates cohesive and shared effort

    (2-3.4 pts) Implied Purpose and

    Audience Information gathering

    adequate Collaboration, if any,

    generally performed as individuals completing tasks,

    roles, and contributions with a single leader assuming

    responsibility

    (0.5-2 pts) Purpose weak or missing

    Target Audience not identified Information gathering weak or

    missing Collaboration ,if any, weak or

    not evidence. Group difficulties with

    communicating and sharing responsibility

    Content Knowledge (15 pts) (10-15 pts) message clear, persuasive,

    and compelling Highly effective use of more or more media formats (i.e.,

    audio, visual, URLs, documents)

    Information and work are authentic and/or properly

    cited

    (5-9 pts) Message clear and

    convincing One or more visual formats used but not consistently

    Some issues with Fair Use, authenticity and/or citation

    (0-4 pts) Message confusing and not

    persuasive Mixed or limited usage of

    visual formats Excessive copyright

    infringement, failure to cite borrowed works and wording

    Format Structure (25 pts) (17-25 pts) Coherent and Organized

    ideas Categories power

    (9-16 pts) Ideas mostly coherent and

    organized Categories present

    (0-8 pts) Ideas lack coherence and

    flow Categories weak or missing

    Text Communication (15 pts) (10-15 pts) Text supports purpose

    powerful word choice and fluency

    few to no mechanical errors

    (5-9 pts) Text matches purpose

    adequately Word choice acceptable but

    may be routine moderate mechanical errors that do not overly interfere

    with the message

    (0-4 pts) Text not appropriate to

    purpose Word choice dull or

    inappropriate fluency issues

    mechanical errors detract from the message

    Image Communication (15 pts)

    (10-15 pts) images enrich meaning

    images are appropriate and accurate with clear labeling

    (5-9 pts) images support meaning

    appropriateness and engagement attempted but not consistent, labeling may

    not be accurate or clear

    (0-4 pts) images not relevant, used

    mostly for decoration detract from or are

    inappropriate to content are overused, confusing, or

    not labeled at all

    Overall Design (25 pts) (17-25 pts) creative, consistent theme

    layout intentional balance and unity in graphics,

    colors, media legible

    overall design consistent for purpose and audience

    (9-16) some pre-made templates design theme appropriate layout balance attempted

    generally legible transitions but some flow

    issues adequate appeal but some

    inconsistency for purpose and audience

    (0-8 pts) design inconsistent or

    inappropriate layout balance not achieved multiple design elements not

    working readability difficult

    distracting overall design unappealing or inappropriate for purpose and

    audience